Berry phase, Chern number

Similar documents
Adiabatic particle pumping and anomalous velocity

Quantum Physics 2: Homework #6

Berry s Phase. Erik Lötstedt November 16, 2004

ADIABATIC PHASES IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Wannier functions, Modern theory of polarization 1 / 51

Symmetry, Topology and Phases of Matter

Topological Insulators and Superconductors

Organizing Principles for Understanding Matter

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Topological Properties of Quantum States of Condensed Matter: some recent surprises.

Berry-phase Approach to Electric Polarization and Charge Fractionalization. Dennis P. Clougherty Department of Physics University of Vermont

Floquet Topological Insulator:

Topological Phases of Matter Out of Equilibrium

Two Dimensional Chern Insulators, the Qi-Wu-Zhang and Haldane Models

Electrons in a periodic potential

Time-Reversal Symmetric Two-Dimensional Topological Insulators: The Bernevig-Hughes-Zhang Model

Berry s phase in Hall Effects and Topological Insulators

Topological Physics in Band Insulators IV

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Physics 221B Spring 1997 Notes 31 Adiabatic Invariance, the Geometric Phase, and the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

Measuring many-body topological invariants using polarons

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

PHYS Quantum Mechanics I - Fall 2011 Problem Set 7 Solutions

physics Documentation

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.other] 20 Apr 2010

Phys460.nb Back to our example. on the same quantum state. i.e., if we have initial condition (5.241) ψ(t = 0) = χ n (t = 0)

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Braiding the localized mid-gap states is achieved by time-evolving them along N discrete time steps t = T/N according to.

3.15. Some symmetry properties of the Berry curvature and the Chern number.

CHEM6085: Density Functional Theory

-state problems and an application to the free particle

Les états de bord d un. isolant de Hall atomique

Topological insulators. Pavel Buividovich (Regensburg)

POEM: Physics of Emergent Materials

A New Class of Adiabatic Cyclic States and Geometric Phases for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Simple one-dimensional potentials

Introduction to topological insulators. Jennifer Cano

Introduction to topological insulators

Lecture notes on topological insulators

Topology of electronic bands and Topological Order

Adiabatic Approximation

1 Recall what is Spin

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

Creating novel quantum phases by artificial magnetic fields

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 26 Sep 2013

Adiabatic Control of Atomic Dressed States for Transport and Sensing

Collection of formulae Quantum mechanics. Basic Formulas Division of Material Science Hans Weber. Operators

Braid Group, Gauge Invariance and Topological Order

Mapping the Berry Curvature of Optical Lattices

Lecture 4: Basic elements of band theory

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

1.6. Quantum mechanical description of the hydrogen atom

Lecture 4: Equations of motion and canonical quantization Read Sakurai Chapter 1.6 and 1.7

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 38 Adiabatic Invariance, the Geometric Phase, and the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

v. Tε n k =ε n k T r T = r, T v T = r, I v I = I r I = v. Iε n k =ε n k Berry curvature: Symmetry Consideration n k = n k

Experimental Reconstruction of the Berry Curvature in a Floquet Bloch Band

Universal phase transitions in Topological lattice models

Quantum Quenches in Chern Insulators

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect

Lecture 7. More dimensions

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions

Topological insulators and the quantum anomalous Hall state. David Vanderbilt Rutgers University

Berry s Phase and the Quantum Geometry of the Fermi Surface

MAGNETIC BLOCH FUNCTIONS AND VECTOR BUNDLES. TYPICAL DISPERSION LAWS AND THEIR QUANTUM NUMBERS

Lecture: Scattering theory

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 6 May 2010

Non-Cyclic Geometric Phase

Berry Phase Effects on Charge and Spin Transport

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Bulk-edge duality for topological insulators

GEOMETRIC PHASES IN QUANTUM THEORY

Ψ(r 1, r 2 ) = ±Ψ(r 2, r 1 ).

Exploring topological states with cold atoms and photons

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 12 Jul 2009

1 Measurement and expectation values

1 Time-Dependent Two-State Systems: Rabi Oscillations

Solutions to chapter 4 problems

Fiber Bundles, The Hopf Map and Magnetic Monopoles

Topology and quantum mechanics

Quantum Mechanics. Problem 1

On The Power Of Coherently Controlled Quantum Adiabatic Evolutions

Chapter 6: SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

1 Mathematical preliminaries

SSH Model. Alessandro David. November 3, 2016

Coordinate and Momentum Representation. Commuting Observables and Simultaneous Measurements. January 30, 2012

26 Group Theory Basics

Kitaev honeycomb lattice model: from A to B and beyond

woptic: Transport Properties with Wannier Functions and Adaptive k-integration

Critical entanglement and geometric phase of a two-qubit model with Dzyaloshinski Moriya anisotropic interaction

Fermi liquid theory. Abstract

Non-Abelian Berry phase and topological spin-currents

Dirac and Weyl fermions in condensed matter systems: an introduction

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/23/05

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Topological Phases in Floquet Systems

Vector Potential for the Magnetic Field

The Hydrogen Atom Chapter 20

2 Acknowledgments 45 A. Adiabatic Evolution 45 References 46 I. INTRODUCTION A. Topical overview In 1984, Michael Berry wrote a paper that has generat

Three Most Important Topics (MIT) Today

Transcription:

Berry phase, Chern number November 17, 2015 November 17, 2015 1 / 22

Literature: 1 J. K. Asbóth, L. Oroszlány, and A. Pályi, arxiv:1509.02295 2 D. Xiao, M-Ch Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959. November 17, 2015 2 / 22

Basic definitions: Berry connection, gauge invariance Consider a quantum state Ψ(R) where R denotes some set of parameters, e.g., v and w from the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. November 17, 2015 3 / 22

Basic definitions: Berry connection, gauge invariance Consider a quantum state Ψ(R) where R denotes some set of parameters, e.g., v and w from the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. The relative phase between two states that are close in the parameter space: e i γ = Ψ(R) Ψ(R+dR) Ψ(R) Ψ(R + dr) γ = i Ψ(R) R Ψ(R) dr November 17, 2015 3 / 22

Basic definitions: Berry connection, gauge invariance Consider a quantum state Ψ(R) where R denotes some set of parameters, e.g., v and w from the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. The relative phase between two states that are close in the parameter space: e i γ = Ψ(R) Ψ(R+dR) Ψ(R) Ψ(R + dr) This equation defines the Berry connection: γ = i Ψ(R) R Ψ(R) dr A = i Ψ(R) R Ψ(R) = Im[ Ψ(R) R Ψ(R) ] (here we used R Ψ(R) Ψ(R) = 0). November 17, 2015 3 / 22

Basic definitions: Berry connection, gauge invariance Consider a quantum state Ψ(R) where R denotes some set of parameters, e.g., v and w from the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. The relative phase between two states that are close in the parameter space: e i γ = Ψ(R) Ψ(R+dR) Ψ(R) Ψ(R + dr) This equation defines the Berry connection: γ = i Ψ(R) R Ψ(R) dr A = i Ψ(R) R Ψ(R) = Im[ Ψ(R) R Ψ(R) ] (here we used R Ψ(R) Ψ(R) = 0). Note, that the Berry connection is not gauge invariant: Ψ(R) e iα(r) Ψ(R) : A(R) A(R)+ R α(r). November 17, 2015 3 / 22

Berry phase Consider a closed directed curve C in parameter space R. The Berry phase along C is defined in the following way: [ ( )] γ i γ(c) = Arg exp i A(R)dR C i November 17, 2015 4 / 22

Berry phase Consider a closed directed curve C in parameter space R. The Berry phase along C is defined in the following way: [ ( )] γ i γ(c) = Arg exp i A(R)dR C i Important: The Berry phase is gauge invariant: the integral of R α(r) depends only on the start and end points of C, hence for a closed curve it is zero. November 17, 2015 4 / 22

Berry curvature Consider the map R Ψ(R) Ψ(R)! We asume that this map is smooth. However, this does not imply that R Ψ(R) is smooth! November 17, 2015 5 / 22

Berry curvature Consider the map R Ψ(R) Ψ(R)! We asume that this map is smooth. However, this does not imply that R Ψ(R) is smooth! Nevertheless, even if the gauge R Ψ(R) is not smooth in the vicinity of a point R 0 in the parameter space, one can always find and alternative gauge Ψ (R) which is : i) locally smooth ii) which generates the same map, i.e., Ψ (R) Ψ (R) = Ψ(R) Ψ(R) November 17, 2015 5 / 22

Berry curvature Consider the map R Ψ(R) Ψ(R)! We asume that this map is smooth. However, this does not imply that R Ψ(R) is smooth! Nevertheless, even if the gauge R Ψ(R) is not smooth in the vicinity of a point R 0 in the parameter space, one can always find and alternative gauge Ψ (R) which is : i) locally smooth ii) which generates the same map, i.e., Ψ (R) Ψ (R) = Ψ(R) Ψ(R) We want to express the gauge invariant Berry phase in terms of a surface integral of a gauge invariant quantity Berry curvature. November 17, 2015 5 / 22

Berry curvature Consider the map R Ψ(R) Ψ(R)! We asume that this map is smooth. However, this does not imply that R Ψ(R) is smooth! Nevertheless, even if the gauge R Ψ(R) is not smooth in the vicinity of a point R 0 in the parameter space, one can always find and alternative gauge Ψ (R) which is : i) locally smooth ii) which generates the same map, i.e., Ψ (R) Ψ (R) = Ψ(R) Ψ(R) We want to express the gauge invariant Berry phase in terms of a surface integral of a gauge invariant quantity Berry curvature. Consider a simply connected region F in a two-dimensional parameter space, with the oriented boundary curve of this surface denoted by F, and calculate the continuum Berry phase corresponding to the F. November 17, 2015 5 / 22

Berry curvature In two dimensions: let R = (x,y). We are looking for a function B(x,y) such that ( ) ( ) exp i A(R)dR = exp i B(x,y)dxdy F F Here B(x,y) is the Berry curvature. November 17, 2015 6 / 22

Berry curvature In two dimensions: let R = (x,y). We are looking for a function B(x,y) such that ( ) ( ) exp i A(R)dR = exp i B(x,y)dxdy F F Here B(x,y) is the Berry curvature. In case Ψ(R) is smooth in the neighbourhood of F then we can use the Stokes theorem: A(R)dR = ( x A y y A x )dxdy = B(x,y)dxdy F F F November 17, 2015 6 / 22

Berry curvature In two dimensions: let R = (x,y). We are looking for a function B(x,y) such that ( ) ( ) exp i A(R)dR = exp i B(x,y)dxdy F F Here B(x,y) is the Berry curvature. In case Ψ(R) is smooth in the neighbourhood of F then we can use the Stokes theorem: A(R)dR = ( x A y y A x )dxdy = B(x,y)dxdy F In 3 dimensional parameter space: F F B(R) = R A(R) Generalization to higher dimensions is also possible. November 17, 2015 6 / 22

Useful formulas for the Berry curvature We want to calculate the Berry phase corresponding to an eigenstate n(r) of some Hamiltonian. B (n) j = Im[ε jkl k n l n ] = Im[ε jkl k n l n ] summation over repeated indeces, and l = Rl. November 17, 2015 7 / 22

Useful formulas for the Berry curvature We want to calculate the Berry phase corresponding to an eigenstate n(r) of some Hamiltonian. B (n) j = Im[ε jkl k n l n ] = Im[ε jkl k n l n ] summation over repeated indeces, and l = Rl. Secondly, inserting 1 = n n n one can write B (n) = Im R n n n n n R n November 17, 2015 7 / 22

Useful formulas for the Berry curvature We want to calculate the Berry phase corresponding to an eigenstate n(r) of some Hamiltonian. B (n) j = Im[ε jkl k n l n ] = Im[ε jkl k n l n ] summation over repeated indeces, and l = Rl. Secondly, inserting 1 = n n n one can write B (n) = Im R n n n n n R n To calculate n R n, one can do the following steps: (both the Hamiltonian Ĥ and the eigenstates n depend on R! ) Ĥ n = E n n R Ĥ n +Ĥ R n = ( R E n ) n +E n R n n R Ĥ n + n Ĥ R n = E n n R n November 17, 2015 7 / 22

Useful formulas for the Berry curvature Since n Ĥ = E n n n R Ĥ n +E n n R n = E n n R n n R Ĥ n = (E n E n ) n R n November 17, 2015 8 / 22

Useful formulas for the Berry curvature Since n Ĥ = E n n n R Ĥ n +E n n R n = E n n R n n R Ĥ n = (E n E n ) n R n Using this result to calculate B (n) = Im R n n n n n R n we find that B (n) = Im n n n R H n n R H n (E n E n ) 2 November 17, 2015 8 / 22

Berry curvature B (n) = Im n n n R H n n R H n (E n E n ) 2 This form manifestly show that the Berry curvature is gauge invariant! November 17, 2015 9 / 22

Berry curvature B (n) = Im n n n R H n n R H n (E n E n ) 2 This form manifestly show that the Berry curvature is gauge invariant! Remarks i) The sum of the Berry curvatures of all eigenstates of a Hamiltonian is zero ii) if the eigenstates are degenerate, then the dynamics must be projected onto the degenerate subspace. In this case the non-abelian Berry curvature naturally arises iii) Berry curvature is often the larges at near-degeneracies November 17, 2015 9 / 22

Example: two level system Consider the following Hamiltonian: H d = d x σ x +d y σ y +d z σ z = d σ where d = (d x,d y,d z ) = R 3 \{0}, to avoid degeneracy Eigenvalues, eigenstates: H(d) ± = ± d ± November 17, 2015 10 / 22

Example: two level system Consider the following Hamiltonian: H d = d x σ x +d y σ y +d z σ z = d σ where d = (d x,d y,d z ) = R 3 \{0}, to avoid degeneracy Eigenvalues, eigenstates: H(d) ± = ± d ± The + eigenstate can be represented in the following form: + = e iα(θ,φ) ( e iφ/2 cos(θ/2) e iφ/2 sin(θ/2) ) where cosθ = d z d, eiφ = d x +id y dx 2 +dy 2 November 17, 2015 10 / 22

Example: two level system Figure : The reprentation of the parameter space on a Bloch sphere November 17, 2015 11 / 22

Example: two level system The choice of phase α(θ,φ) corresponds to fixing a gauge. Several choices are possible: November 17, 2015 12 / 22

Example: two level system The choice of phase α(θ,φ) corresponds to fixing a gauge. Several choices are possible: 1) α(θ,φ) = 0 for all θ, φ. + 0 = ( e iφ/2 cos(θ/2) e iφ/2 sin(θ/2) We except that φ = 0 and φ = 2π should correspond to the same state in the Hilbert space state. However, +(θ,φ = 0) = +(θ,φ = 2π). ) November 17, 2015 12 / 22

Example: two level system The choice of phase α(θ,φ) corresponds to fixing a gauge. Several choices are possible: 1) α(θ,φ) = 0 for all θ, φ. + 0 = ( e iφ/2 cos(θ/2) e iφ/2 sin(θ/2) We except that φ = 0 and φ = 2π should correspond to the same state in the Hilbert space state. However, +(θ,φ = 0) = +(θ,φ = 2π). 2) α(θ,φ) = φ/2. Then we have + S = ( cos(θ/2) e iφ sin(θ/2) There are two interesting points: the north (θ = 0) and the south (θ = π) points. For θ = 0 + S = (1,0) but for θ = π + S = (0,e iφ ), i.e., the value of the wave function depends on the direction one approaches the south pole. ) ) November 17, 2015 12 / 22

Example: two level system A couple of other choices are possible, one can try to find a gauge where the wavefunction is well behaved everywhere on the Bloch sphere. It turns out that there is no such gauge. Calculating the Berry phase for a two level system Let us take a closed curve C in the parameter space R 3 \{0} and calculate the Berry phase for the state. γ = A(d)dd, A (d) = i d C The calculation is easier if one uses the Berry curvature. November 17, 2015 13 / 22

Calculating the Berry phase for a two level system B ± ± dĥ dĥ ± (d) = Im 4 d 2, d Ĥ = σ This can be evaluated in any of the gauges. B ± (d) = ± d 1 d 2 d 2 This is the field of a pointlike monopole source in the origin. November 17, 2015 14 / 22

Calculating the Berry phase for a two level system The Berry phase of the closed loop C in parameter space is the flux of the monopole field through a surface F whose boundary is C. November 17, 2015 15 / 22

Calculating the Berry phase for a two level system The Berry phase of the closed loop C in parameter space is the flux of the monopole field through a surface F whose boundary is C. This is half of the solid angle subtended by the curve: γ = 1 2 Ω C, γ + = γ November 17, 2015 15 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The Berry phase can be interpreted as a phase acquired by the wavefunction as the parameters appearing in the Hamiltonian are changing slowly in time. Ĥ(R) n(r) = E n (R) n(r) where we have fixed the gauge of n(r). Assume that the parameters of the Hamiltonian at t = 0 are R = R 0 and there are no degeneracies in the spectrum. The system is in an eigenstate n(r 0 ) for t = 0. R(t = 0) = R 0, Ψ(t = 0) = n(r 0 ) November 17, 2015 16 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The Berry phase can be interpreted as a phase acquired by the wavefunction as the parameters appearing in the Hamiltonian are changing slowly in time. Ĥ(R) n(r) = E n (R) n(r) where we have fixed the gauge of n(r). Assume that the parameters of the Hamiltonian at t = 0 are R = R 0 and there are no degeneracies in the spectrum. The system is in an eigenstate n(r 0 ) for t = 0. R(t = 0) = R 0, Ψ(t = 0) = n(r 0 ) Now consider the situation when R is slowly changed in time and the values of R(t) define a continuous curve C. Also, assume that n(r) is smooth along C. November 17, 2015 16 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The wavefunction evolves according to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: i Ψ(t) = Ĥ(R(t)) Ψ(t) t November 17, 2015 17 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The wavefunction evolves according to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: i Ψ(t) = Ĥ(R(t)) Ψ(t) t Further important assumption: starting from the initial state n(r 0 ) for all times the state n(r(t)) remains non-degenerate. November 17, 2015 17 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The wavefunction evolves according to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: i Ψ(t) = Ĥ(R(t)) Ψ(t) t Further important assumption: starting from the initial state n(r 0 ) for all times the state n(r(t)) remains non-degenerate. In this case one can choose the rate of change R(t) along C slow enough such that the system remains in an eigenstate n(r(t)) (adiabatic approximation). However, n(r(t)) picks up a phase factor during the time evolution. November 17, 2015 17 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The wavefunction evolves according to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: i Ψ(t) = Ĥ(R(t)) Ψ(t) t Further important assumption: starting from the initial state n(r 0 ) for all times the state n(r(t)) remains non-degenerate. In this case one can choose the rate of change R(t) along C slow enough such that the system remains in an eigenstate n(r(t)) (adiabatic approximation). However, n(r(t)) picks up a phase factor during the time evolution. Ansatz: Ψ(t) = e iγ(t) e i/ t 0 En(R(t ))dt n(r(t)) November 17, 2015 17 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The parameter vector R(t) traces out a curve C in the parameter space. Substituting the above Ansatz into the Schrödinger equation, one can show that γ n (C) = i n(r) R n(r) dr C November 17, 2015 18 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The parameter vector R(t) traces out a curve C in the parameter space. Substituting the above Ansatz into the Schrödinger equation, one can show that γ n (C) = i n(r) R n(r) dr C Consider now an adiabatic and cyclic change of the Hamiltonian, such that R(t = 0) = R(t = T). In this case the adiabatic phase reads γ n (C) = i n(r) R n(r) dr C The phase that a state acquires during a cyclic and adiabatic change of the Hamiltonian is equivalent to the Berry phase corresponding to the closed curve representing the Hamiltonian s path in the parameter space. November 17, 2015 18 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation The parameter vector R(t) traces out a curve C in the parameter space. Substituting the above Ansatz into the Schrödinger equation, one can show that γ n (C) = i n(r) R n(r) dr C Consider now an adiabatic and cyclic change of the Hamiltonian, such that R(t = 0) = R(t = T). In this case the adiabatic phase reads γ n (C) = i n(r) R n(r) dr C The phase that a state acquires during a cyclic and adiabatic change of the Hamiltonian is equivalent to the Berry phase corresponding to the closed curve representing the Hamiltonian s path in the parameter space. November 17, 2015 18 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation Considering the Berry curvature instead of the Berry connection, one can reformulate the above findings in the following way. November 17, 2015 19 / 22

Berry phase: physical interpretation Considering the Berry curvature instead of the Berry connection, one can reformulate the above findings in the following way. Although the system remains in the same state n(r) during the adiabatic evolution, other states of the system n (R), n n are nevertheless influencing the state n(r). This influence is manifested in the Berry curvature, which, in turn, determines the Berry phase picked up by n(r). November 17, 2015 19 / 22

Chern number Let us now consider Berry phase effects in crystalline solids. November 17, 2015 20 / 22

Chern number Let us now consider Berry phase effects in crystalline solids. In the independent electron approximation, the Hamiltonian reads Ĥ = ˆp2 2m e +V(r) where V(r) = V(r+R n ) is periodic, R n is a lattice vector. November 17, 2015 20 / 22

Chern number Let us now consider Berry phase effects in crystalline solids. In the independent electron approximation, the Hamiltonian reads Ĥ = ˆp2 2m e +V(r) where V(r) = V(r+R n ) is periodic, R n is a lattice vector. Generally, the solutions of the Schrödinger equations are Bloch wavefunctions. They satisfy the following boundary condition (Bloch s theorem): Ψ mk (r+r n ) = e ikrn Ψ mk (r) Here Ψ mk is the eigenstate corresponding to the mth band and k is the wave number which is defined in the Brillouin zone. November 17, 2015 20 / 22

Chern number Let us now consider Berry phase effects in crystalline solids. In the independent electron approximation, the Hamiltonian reads Ĥ = ˆp2 2m e +V(r) where V(r) = V(r+R n ) is periodic, R n is a lattice vector. Generally, the solutions of the Schrödinger equations are Bloch wavefunctions. They satisfy the following boundary condition (Bloch s theorem): Ψ mk (r+r n ) = e ikrn Ψ mk (r) Here Ψ mk is the eigenstate corresponding to the mth band and k is the wave number which is defined in the Brillouin zone. Note, that the Brillouin zone has a topology of a torus: wave numbers k which differ by a reciprocal wave vector G describe the same state. November 17, 2015 20 / 22

Chern number The Bloch wavefunctions can be written in the following form: Ψ mk = e ikr u mk (r) where u mk (r) is lattice periodic: u mk (r) = u mk (r+r n ). November 17, 2015 21 / 22

Chern number The Bloch wavefunctions can be written in the following form: Ψ mk = e ikr u mk (r) where u mk (r) is lattice periodic: u mk (r) = u mk (r+r n ). The functions u mk (r) satisfy the following Schrödinger equation: [ ] (ˆp + k) 2 +V(r) u mk (r) = E mk u mk (r) 2m e November 17, 2015 21 / 22

Chern number The Bloch wavefunctions can be written in the following form: Ψ mk = e ikr u mk (r) where u mk (r) is lattice periodic: u mk (r) = u mk (r+r n ). The functions u mk (r) satisfy the following Schrödinger equation: [ ] (ˆp + k) 2 +V(r) u mk (r) = E mk u mk (r) 2m e This can be written as Ĥ(k) u m (k) = E m (k) u m (k) = the Brillouin zone can be considered as the parameter space for the Hamiltonian Ĥ(k) and u m(k) are the basis functions. November 17, 2015 21 / 22

Chern number The Bloch wavefunctions can be written in the following form: Ψ mk = e ikr u mk (r) where u mk (r) is lattice periodic: u mk (r) = u mk (r+r n ). The functions u mk (r) satisfy the following Schrödinger equation: [ ] (ˆp + k) 2 +V(r) u mk (r) = E mk u mk (r) 2m e This can be written as Ĥ(k) u m (k) = E m (k) u m (k) = the Brillouin zone can be considered as the parameter space for the Hamiltonian Ĥ(k) and u m(k) are the basis functions. Various Berry phase effects can be expected, if k is varied in the wavenumber space. November 17, 2015 21 / 22

Chern number For simplicity, let us consider a two-dimensional crystalline system. Then the Berry connection of the mth band : A (m) (k) = i u m (k) k u m (k) k = (k x,k y ). and the Berry curvature as Ω (m) (k) = k i u m (k) k u m (k) November 17, 2015 22 / 22

Chern number For simplicity, let us consider a two-dimensional crystalline system. Then the Berry connection of the mth band : A (m) (k) = i u m (k) k u m (k) k = (k x,k y ). and the Berry curvature as Ω (m) (k) = k i u m (k) k u m (k) Finally, the Chern number of the mth band is defined as Q (m) = 1 Ω (m) (k)dk 2π integration is taken over the Brillouin zone (BZ). The Chern number is an intrinsic property of the band structure and has various effects on the transport properties of the system. BZ November 17, 2015 22 / 22