Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
4kU. Measurement of Storage Ring Motion at the Advanced Light Source. QSTt ERNESTORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEYNATIONAL LABORATORY

To be published in the Proceedings of ICEC-22, Seoul Korea, July 2008 MICE Note 232 1

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Survey, Alignment and Beam Stability at the Advanced Light Source

The PEP-I1 B-Factory Septum Quadrupole Magnet

Design of Current Leads for the MICE Coupling Magnet

N. Tsoupas, E. Rodger, J. Claus, H.W. Foelsche, and P. Wanderer Brookhaven National Laboratory Associated Universities, Inc. Upton, New York 11973

Bulk Modulus Capacitor Load Cells

Start-up Noise in 3-D Self-AmpMed

Bandgap Photons to GaInP2

Undulator Interruption in

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

Development of a High Intensity EBIT for Basic and Applied Science

Multicusp Sources for Ion Beam Lithography Applications

Magnet and Cryostat Configurations For a Multi-port Quadrupole Array*

Colliding Crystalline Beams

Accelerators. Table Quadrupole magnet

in Partially Ordered GaInPdGaAs

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

On the HalfiLife of LABORATORY ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEYNATIONAL. and Particle Astrophysics Nuclear Science and Physics Divisions

A Distributed Radiator, Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Target with Realistic, Multibeam Illumination Geometry

Optimization of NSLS-II Blade X-ray Beam Position Monitors: from Photoemission type to Diamond Detector. P. Ilinski

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Magnetic Measurements of the Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Prototype

IMPACT OF EDGE CURRENT DENSITY AND PRESSURE GRADIENT ON THE STABILITY OF DIII-D HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCHARGES

Clifford K. Ho and Michael L. Wilson Sandia National Laboratories. P.O. Box Albuquerque, NM

Magnetic and Cryogenic Design of the MICE Coupling Solenoid Magnet System

Applications of Pulse Shape Analysis to HPGe Gamma-Ray Detectors

+.V) eo(o) -2 so - sx. hngc)90w3-- Beam-beam collisions and crossing angles in RHIC*

GA A22677 THERMAL ANALYSIS AND TESTING FOR DIII D OHMIC HEATING COIL

GA A22722 CENTRAL THOMSON SCATTERING UPGRADE ON DIII D

DML and Foil Measurements of ETA Beam Radius

Hydra Fault Current Limiting HTS Cable to be Installed in the Consolidated Edison Grid

Beam Dynamics Activities at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab)

Quantum Suppression of Beamstrahlung for Future Linear Colliders

GA A22689 SLOW LINER FUSION

GA A23736 EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION SHAPE ON L MODE AND H MODE ENERGY TRANSPORT

AC dipole based optics measurement and correction at RHIC

FUSION WITH Z-PINCHES. Don Cook. Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

GA A26686 FAST ION EFFECTS DURING TEST BLANKET MODULE SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS IN DIII-D

RESEARCH IN ACCELERATOR PHYSICS (THEORY)

CQNl_" RESPONSE TO 100% INTERNAL QUANTUM EFFICIENCY SILICON PHOTODIODES TO LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS AND IONS

The photoneutron yield predictions by PICA and comparison with the measurements

Status and Progress of a Fault Current Limiting HTS Cable To Be Installed In The Consolidated Edison Grid

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NEUTRAL BEAMLINE IRON TO PLASMA NON-AXISYMMETRIC FIELDS

BWXT Y-12 Y-12. A BWXT/Bechtel Enterprise SMALL, PORTABLE, LIGHTWEIGHT DT NEUTRON GENERATOR FOR USE WITH NMIS

Fission-Fusion Neutron Source

The NLC Positron Source*

GA A25853 FAST ION REDISTRIBUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HYBRID REGIME

Excitations of the transversely polarized spin density. waves in chromium. E3-r 1s

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (06/16/1998-9/15/1998):

Understanding the Nonlinear Beam Dynamics of the Advanced Light Source

OF A HELIUM-COOLED MODULE

GA A26057 DEMONSTRATION OF ITER OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS ON DIII-D

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

PREDICTIVE MODELING OF PLASMA HALO EVOLUTION IN POST-THERMAL QUENCH DISRUPTING PLASMAS

PLASMA MASS DENSITY, SPECIES MIX AND FLUCTUATION DIAGNOSTICS USING FAST ALFVEN WAVE

A Dramatically Reduced Size in the Ganty Design for the Proton-Carbon Therapy. June Collider-Accelerator Department

Modeling Laser and e-beam Generated Plasma-Plume Experiments Using LASNEX

12/16/95-3/15/96 PERIOD MULTI-PARAMETER ON-LINE COAL BULK ANALYSIS. 2, 1. Thermal Neutron Flux in Coal: New Coal Container Geometry

GA A26474 SYNERGY IN TWO-FREQUENCY FAST WAVE CYCLOTRON HARMONIC ABSORPTION IN DIII-D

Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung mbh (GSI), Planckstrasse 1, D Darmstadt, Germany

Flipping Bits in the James Webb Space Telescope s Cameras

Analysis of Coupled Electromagnetic-Thermal Effects in Superconducting Accelerator Magnets

GA A23168 TOKAMAK REACTOR DESIGNS AS A FUNCTION OF ASPECT RATIO

The Design and Fabrication of a 6 Tesla EBIT Solenoid

STUDY OF CYCLOTRON RESONANCE AND MAGNETO-PHOTOLUMINESCENCE OF N-TYPE MODULATION DOPED InGaAs QUANTUM WELL LAYERS AND THEIR CHARACTERIZATIONS

Walter P. Lysenko John D. Gilpatrick Martin E. Schulze LINAC '98 XIX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 23-28,1998

Quench Propagation Velocity for Highly Stabilized Conductors

DE '! N0V ?

GA A23713 RECENT ECCD EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON DIII D

REFRIGERA TION OPTIONS FOR THE ADVANCED LIGHT SOURCE SUPERB END DIPOLE MAGNETS

Analysis of Shane Telescope Aberration and After Collimation

Scaling of divertor heat flux profile widths in DIII-D

M. Lee, Y Cai, J. Corbett, H. Shoaee, D. Whitturn, G. White, Y. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California Y.

Three-Dimensional Silicon Photonic Crystals

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY O F CALIFORNIA

Capabilities for Testing the Electronic Configuration in Pu

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

Experimental Facilities Division, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratoty, Argonne, Illinois 60439

Controlling Backstreaming Ions from X-ray Converter Targets with Time Varying Final Focusing Solenoidal Lens and Beam Energy Variation

Tell uric prof i 1 es across the Darrough Known Geothermal Resource Area, Nevada. Harold Kaufniann. Open-file Report No.

GA A25658 PRECISION X-RAY OPTICAL DEPTH MEASUREMENTS IN ICF SHELLS

GA A24016 PHYSICS OF OFF-AXIS ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE

1 GeV CW nonscaling FFAG for ADS, and magnet parameters

PROCEEDINGS THIRD WORKSHOP GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ENGINEERING. December 14-15,1977

INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND HIGH RESOLUTION MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY OF WEAKLY BOUND COMPLEXES. Final Progress Report

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

RESONANCE INTERFERENCE AND ABSOLUTE CROSS SECTIONS IN NEAR-THRESHOLD ELECTRON-IMPACT EXCITATION OF MULTICHARGED IONS

BASAL CAMBRIAN BASELINE GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION COMPLETED

in the pinch. This paper describes the computer modeling behind the shielding design of a

Constant of Motion for a One- Dimensional and nth-order Autonomous System and Its Relation to the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian

3 rd ILSF Advanced School on Synchrotron Radiation and Its Applications

N = 2 String Amplitudes *

GA A27235 EULERIAN SIMULATIONS OF NEOCLASSICAL FLOWS AND TRANSPORT IN THE TOKAMAK PLASMA EDGE AND OUTER CORE

by KAPL, Inc. a Lockheed Martin company KAPL-P EFFECTS OF STATOR AND ROTOR CORE OVALITY ON INDUCTION MACHINE BEHAVIOR September 1996 NOTICE

A Comparison of Least Squares Linear Regression and Measurement Error Modeling of WadCold Multipole Correlation in SSC Prototype Dipole Magnets

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Transcription:

e LBL-3732 UC-414 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Presented at the InternationalMagnet Technology Conference 14 Tampere, Finland, June 11-16, 1995, and to be published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Design Parameters for a 7.2 Tesla Bending Magnet for a 1.5 GeV Compact Light Source M.A. Green and D. Madura June 1995 d Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract Number DE-ACO3-76SFOOO98 D!STRI%UTJQN OF T-$5 C W M E i d T E UI\IL~TI#TED

DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied. or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness. or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is an equal opportunity employer.

LBL-3732 SC-MAG 528 UC-414 Design Parameters for a 7.2 Tesla Bending Magnet for a 1.5 GeV Compact Light Source M.A. Green* and D. Madura** *Accelerator and Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 9472 **ADO Lockheed Martin, Rancho Bernardo, California 92125 June 1995 This work was supported by the Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-FGO3-94ER8 1826 and Contract No. DE-AC3-76SF98.

Design Parameters for a 7.2 Tesla Bending Magnet for a 1.5 GeV Compact Light Source* h4. A. Greena and D.Wmb a Lamnce Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA 9472,USA b ADO Lockheed Martin, Rancho Bernard CA 92125, USA Abstract-This report describes the design for a 7.2 tesla superconducting dipole magnet for a compact synchrotron light source. The proposed magnet is a Vobly type modified picture frame dipole that has the flux returned through Unsaturated iron. In this magnet, The iron in the pole pieces is highly saturated. Separately powered coils around the poie pieces are used to direct the flux lines until the flux can be returned through the unsaturated iron. The proposed dipole will develop a uniform field over a region that is 8 mm high by 13 mm wide over a range of central induction from.4 T to almost 8 T. Each dipole for the compact light source will have a magnetic length of about 3 8 meters. 7 Dipole Cryostat Vacuum L BACKGROUNDONTHEmRAGERING I Themagnetthatisdescribedinthereportisdesignedfor use in a compact electron storage ring that is to produce intense x rays with energies up to 35 kev[1,2]. Storagering energies up to 15GeV are proposed. In order to produce synchrotron radiation x ray beams with a critical energy greater than 1keV, the central induction of the dipoles used to produce the synchrotronradiarion must be greater than 6.8 tesla 131. The machine is designed primarily as a light source. for industrial, biological and medical applications. As a result, the ring must be compact and the ring must be relatively inexpensive to build. The ring has a hybrid magnet structure, consisting of superconductingdipoles and mom temperature quadrupoles and sextupdes. The shape of the ring is racetrack. The two am are identical and each arc is symmetric about its centex. The two straight sections joining the arcs have the same length but each has different structure. Each of the two arcs has three bending stations where the electron beam is bent 6 degrees. Each bending station contains two straight cold iron dipoles that bend the beam and produce the synchrotron radiation x rays. The x rays that are delivered to the user come from the downstream cold iron dipole. The bending induction required for a 1.5 GeV ring that produces x rays with a critical energy of 1.4 kev is 6.894 T. In addition to providing the bending needed in the ring, the straight dipoles also provide defocusing (through edge focusing) to the lattice. Two bending stations and the arc focusing between the stations are shown in Fig. 1. The pair of straight cold iron dipoles are shown within the cryostatvacuumvesselboundary. 1 meters 1 1 II I 2 Fig. 1A section of a 15GeV Light source Synchrotron ShowingTwo Bending Stations ILTHEDIPOLEDESIGNREQV The key to making a compact electron storage ring is the fabrication of short high field dipoles that have the end field characteristicsof mom tempemure, low field copper and iron dipoles. Within the magnet, the field quality has to be verygood. Beamdynamicsstudiessuggestthattheinte~M field has to be good to one part in loo over a region that is &2 mm wide around the electron beam. Picture frame magnets can have a very good field over the entire width of the magnet pole. Fig. 2 shows the gap region for the dipoles shown in Fig. 1. The magnet horizontal aperture @ole width) is governed by beam sagitta, the x ray fan allowance, the 15sigma beam width, the width of thexray absorber and the insulation thickness between the warm bore tube and the 4.4 K region. The magnet vextical aperture (the cold gap) is governed by the 15 sigma beam height and the insulation thickness between the warm bore tube and the pole. The x ray absorber in the downstream dipole vacuum chamber absorbsthe synchrotronradiation m r g y generated in the upstream dipole (See Fig. 1). The vacuum chamber for the diple pair can be cooled to 18 K Using a conventional refrigerator provided the beam cufient in the storage ring is not too high (less than 3 ma). A 18 K vacuum chamber Received 12 June 1995 *This work was performed with the helps maintain the good vacuum required for the beam. If a support of the Office of High Energy Physics, US Depamnent of high beam curzent light source is desired, the machine W c e Energy under antract number DE-FG3-94ER81826 has to be changed to split the dipoles in the pairgi. -1-

with unwtllrated iron poles. Away from the gap, the gap and crossover coil currents cancel each other. 3) The function of the shield coil is to keep flux from leaking out of the pole as it becomes saturated. When the current in the shield coil is correctly selected, the flux lines from gap stay perpendicular to the pole face even within the pole iron. The shield coil current will be nearly zero when the induction in the gap is less than 2 T. As the gap induction increases above 2 T, the current in the shield coil increases -linearly with 'the gap induction minus the saturationinduction of the iron (-2T). The dipole shown in Fig. 3 will generate a d o r m field over a range of induction from.4 to 7.8 T, provided that the current density in the shield coil is c o m t l y chosen with respect to the current density in the gap and crossover coils. The shield coil current can be set so that sextuple, decapole and 14 pole field components are nearly zero. The excitation function for the shield coil can be modified by changing the height and slope angle of the shield coil [a. The induction in the pole iron and the gap will be the same L18K Wall L4.4 K Wall while the rest of the iron will be unsabmted.. The iron crosssection in Fig. 3 can be optimized (for example, cutting off Fig. 2 The Gap Region of the Compact Ring Dipole the comers) to reduce the dipolecold mass. Shown in the Storage Ring Section in Fig. 1 Fig. 4 is a three dimensional view of the dipole coil system. The arrows in Fig. 4 show the direction of current III THE72TEsLASUPERcoNDucIzNGDIpoLE flow. Fig. 5 is a cross-section of the 7 2 tesla magnet in the The design for the dipole is based on an idea proposed plane of the electron beam. The direction of current flow in by Pave1 Vobly at INP Novosibi[4,5] Fig. 3 shows a the three types of coils is also shown in Fig. 5. The location cross-section through the center of a 72 tesla Vobly dipole. of the two magnets in the pair with respect to each other is The dipole shown in Fig. 3 consists of three different coils: also shown. From Figs. 3, 4 and 5, one can see that the 1) The gap coils generate the magnetic flux within the gap. windings in the dipole can be quite simple. The gap and crossover coils can be wound as flat pancakes with no bends The current in the gap coil is approximately linear with the out of the plane of the pancake. The coil corner radii should magnetic induction within the gap. 2) The crossover coils in be kept as small as possible. The suppoa of the coils against effect carry the current from one side of the gap to the other magnetic forces is very important at high fields. si& of the gap. This coil is in seaies with the gap coil; it acts as the end crossover coils act in a conventional H magnet Lfqukl Cooled X Ray Absorber &---Pole Width = 13 mm-m -

Upper Crossover W i Left Gap Coil High Field Region Lower Shield Coil The m o w s indicate the direction of currentfrow in the six coils. \ I - Lower Crossover Coil '! Fig. 4 A Three Dimensional Artists Conception of the 7.2 Tesla Dipole Coil System Saiuratcd Pole Iron \ -, Fig. 5 A Cross-section through the Center of the 7.2 T Dipole Perpendicular to the Y Axis in the Plane of the Electron Beam (It should be noted that the beam vacuum chamber is not shown in this figure in order to show the current paths.) The flux plot in Fig. 6 illustrates how the shield coil contains the magnetic flux in the iron pole pieces when the central induction is 7. tesla. Fig. 6 show that the flux density in the pole is the came as the flux density within the gap. The current density in the shield coil is 166.6 MA per square meter while the current density in the gap and crossover coils is 27. MA per square meter. (See Fig. 7) The high field point in the two dimensional coil cross-section is nearly the same as the central induction of the dipole. The high field point is found outside the iron at the juncture of the gap and cxssove-rcoils. Table I presents the basic magnet parameten for the 7.2 tesla dipole shown in Figs. 3,4, and 5. While the design central induction for the magnet is 7.2 tesla, its nominal operating central induction in the 1.5 GeV ring configuration shown in Fig. 1 is closer 6.9 tesk The required integrated dipole for the ring is about 2.62 tesla meters per 3 degree bend segment If one bases the coil design shown in Fig. 3 on a cable made from SSC inner conductor (with a copper to S/Cratio of 1.4), the dipole will operate at about 91% of its critical current along the load line (based on a metal packing fraction of.7 and an operating temperature of 4.4 K) when the central induction is 7.2 T. It appears that the SSC inner superconductor can be cabled into conductor of almost any desired currentfor this application. -3-

IV.coNcursrON Table I COMPACT LIGHT SOURCE DIPOLE PARAhGTERS DipoleBendAngk(degnxs) X Ray Fan Angle (degrees) DesigninductionatCenm(T) MagneticLength (mm) Magnet Cold Gap (mm) Magnet Jrcm Pole Width (mm) Shield Cod Height (mm) CodThickness (mm) Stored Energy at Design Induction Peaklnduction in Winding hhngth(mm) Inrnwidth (mm) Iron Height (mm) Estimated Cold Mass per Dipole (IC& 3. 2. 72-38 8. 13. 148. 25. -23-73 376. 644. 54. -11. A compact synchrotron with 7 2 tesla superconducting bending magnets appears to be feasible. The key to making the compact synchrotron is having a short high field bending magnet that has end field characteristics that are similar to conventional low field copper iron magnets. This means that the magnetic flux must be constrained in the poles while the frame magnet magnet is running at high field. The picdesign proposed by Pave1Vobly of INPNovosibirsk has this desirable characteristic even for short dipoles. The primary disadvantage of the Vobly magnet design is that it requires two separate power supplies in order for the magnet to produce good field quality over a range of inductions. The cost of the dipole is primarily a function of the width of the pole, not the gap. Since most of the iron in the magnet is unsamted, the iron height and width is a function of the pole width and the saturation induction of the h n. The dipole design presented in this report is not very efficient in its use of superconductor. Unlike many superconducting dipoles, the cost of the superconductor is not a large part of the capital cost of this magnet. However, it would be difficult to justify the use of the Vobly design for the long dipoles that are typically used for high energy physics ITlaChines. The author acknowledgethe efforts of A. A. Garren and J. J. Kolonko and L. C. Schachinger in providing the basic parameters of the superconductingdipole studied in this reporr This work was performed with the support of the Officeof High Energy and Nuclear Physics, United States Department of Energy under contract number DE-FG3-94ER81826 and contract nuniber DE-ACO3-76SFO98. Fig. 6 A Two Dimensional Flux Plot for the Dipole at a Central Induction of 7 tesla REFERENCES [l] D. B. Cline A. A. Gmen. M. A. Green, et al, "A Compact Hard X Ray Source for Medical Imaging and Biomolecular Studies." to be published in NIM (1995). UcLAcAA112 [2] A. A. Gmen, et al. "A 1 5 GeV Compact Light Source with Superconducting Bending Magnets," to be published in the Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference, Dallas TX. USA, 1-5 May 1995 [3] M. A Green and A. A. Garren, "Optimization of Superconducting Bending Magnets for a 1. to 1 5 GeV Compact Light Source," to be published in the Proceedings of the 14th Magnet Technology Conference. Tampere, Finland, 11-16 June 1995 [4] G. N. Kulipanov, N. A. M m t s e v, L. G. Morgonov, et al, "Developmentof a Superconducting Compact Storage Rings for Technical Purposes in the USSR." Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63 (1). p 731 (1992) [SI P. D. Vobly, private communication concerning compact synchrotron dipole magnet designs [6] M. A. Green, "Superconducting Dipole Magnets for Compact Light Source Storage Rings." Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Internal Report BID-25.9 Feb. 1994. 2 4 Central Induction of tho Dipde (T) 8 Fig. 7 CurrentDensity in the Gap and Crossover Coils and the Shield Coils as a Function of Central Induction