Magnetic symmetries:

Similar documents
Wannier functions, Bloch bundles and topological degree theory

Geometric derivation of

Inequivalent bundle representations for the Noncommutative Torus

Geometric Aspects of Quantum Condensed Matter

Topological nature of the Fu-Kane-Mele invariants. Giuseppe De Nittis

MAGNETIC BLOCH FUNCTIONS AND VECTOR BUNDLES. TYPICAL DISPERSION LAWS AND THEIR QUANTUM NUMBERS

ON EFFECTIVE HAMILTONIANS FOR ADIABATIC PERTURBATIONS. Mouez Dimassi Jean-Claude Guillot James Ralston

The Localization Dichotomy for Periodic Schro dinger Operators

Maximally localized Wannier functions for periodic Schrödinger operators: the MV functional and the geometry of the Bloch bundle

The semiclassical. model for adiabatic slow-fast systems and the Hofstadter butterfly

Bloch Theory for 1D-FLC Aperiodic Media

Topological Physics in Band Insulators IV

Waves in Honeycomb Structures

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 2

Periodic Approximant. Aperiodic Hamiltonians

Numerical construction of Wannier functions

Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2

Top Math-Φ. - Abstract Book - Plenary Lectures. J. Alfaro (PUC, Chile) Mysteries of the Cosmos

Floquet Topological Insulators and Majorana Modes

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

physics Documentation

Mathematical Analysis of a Generalized Chiral Quark Soliton Model

1 Definition and Basic Properties of Compa Operator

3.15. Some symmetry properties of the Berry curvature and the Chern number.

Reconstruction theorems in noncommutative Riemannian geometry

First-Principles Calculation of Topological Invariants (Wannier Functions Approach) Alexey A. Soluyanov

Periodic Schrödinger operators with δ -potentials

Automorphic Equivalence Within Gapped Phases

Paradigms of Probabilistic Modelling

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.other] 20 Apr 2010

The Unitary Group In Its Strong Topology

On a class of self-adjoint operators in Krein space with empty resolvent set

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem

Compact symetric bilinear forms

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C :

Trails in Quantum Mechanics and Surroundings. January 29 30, 2018, Trieste (Italy) SISSA. Programme & Abstracts

Lecture 4: Equations of motion and canonical quantization Read Sakurai Chapter 1.6 and 1.7

Chapter 5. Density matrix formalism

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1

Two Dimensional Chern Insulators, the Qi-Wu-Zhang and Haldane Models

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 16 Bloch s Theorem and Band Structure in One Dimension

3 Symmetry Protected Topological Phase

Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems

arxiv: v4 [math-ph] 24 Dec 2016

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

MATH 263: PROBLEM SET 1: BUNDLES, SHEAVES AND HODGE THEORY

POEM: Physics of Emergent Materials

Supercell method for the computation of energies of crystals

Topological insulators. Pavel Buividovich (Regensburg)

Structure and Topology of Band Structures in the 1651 Magnetic Space Groups

Geometry of gerbes and topological insulators

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

A users guide to K-theory

Perturbation Theory for Self-Adjoint Operators in Krein spaces

Bulk-edge duality for topological insulators

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

WANNIER TRANSFORM APERIODIC SOLIDS. for. Jean BELLISSARD. Collaboration:

Floquet theory of photo-induced topological phase transitions: Application to graphene

Unbounded KK-theory and KK-bordisms

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Thouless conductance, Landauer-Büttiker currents and spectrum

Think Globally, Act Locally

Fractal Weyl Laws and Wave Decay for General Trapping

The Quantum Hall Conductance: A rigorous proof of quantization

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

Topics in Representation Theory: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

Abelian and non-abelian Hopfions in all odd dimensions

Hopf Fibrations. Consider a classical magnetization field in R 3 which is longitidinally stiff and transversally soft.

3.14. The model of Haldane on a honeycomb lattice

ON THE CHERN CHARACTER OF A THETA-SUMMABLE FREDHOLM MODULE.

Kai Sun. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Collaborators: Krishna Kumar and Eduardo Fradkin (UIUC)

Topological Phases in Floquet Systems

Dynamics of electrons in crystalline solids: Wannier functions,

Title: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on

Compressed representation of Kohn-Sham orbitals via selected columns of the density matrix

to 1D Periodic Approximants Aperiodic Hamiltonians Sponsoring Jean BELLISSARD CRC 701, Bielefeld, Germany

Exact embedding of local defects in crystals

Geometry and the Kato square root problem

Diffusion of wave packets in a Markov random potential

On the K-theory classification of topological states of matter

Topological Properties of Quantum States of Condensed Matter: some recent surprises.

Electrons in a periodic potential

The following definition is fundamental.

Mean-Field Limits for Large Particle Systems Lecture 2: From Schrödinger to Hartree

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Quantum Physics 2: Homework #6

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018

Chapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity

conventions and notation

MULTIPLIERS ON SPACES OF FUNCTIONS ON A LOCALLY COMPACT ABELIAN GROUP WITH VALUES IN A HILBERT SPACE. Violeta Petkova

Chern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action,

NOTES ON NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM XU WANG

Algebra C Numerical Linear Algebra Sample Exam Problems

E 0 0 F [E] + [F ] = 3. Chern-Weil Theory How can you tell if idempotents over X are similar?

Transcription:

Magnetic symmetries: applications and prospects Giuseppe De Nittis (AGM, Université de Cergy-Pontoise) Friedrich Schiller Universität, Mathematisches Institut, Jena. April 18, 2012 Joint work with: M. Lein (Universität Tübingen) Reference article: J. Math. Phys. 52, 112103 (2011) Grant N.: ANR-08-BLAN-0261-01

From symmetries to Bloch-bundle H = separable Hilbert space, U : Z N U (H ) = unit. rep. (wandering syst. + algebraically. comp.), H L (H ), H = H (not necessarily bounded), DEFINITION H has a Z N -symmetry iff [f (H);U(n)] = 0, n Z N, f L (R).

From symmetries to Bloch-bundle H = separable Hilbert space, U : Z N U (H ) = unit. rep. (wandering syst. + algebraically. comp.), H L (H ), H = H (not necessarily bounded), DEFINITION H has a Z N -symmetry iff [f (H);U(n)] = 0, n Z N, f L (R). THEOREM (G. D. & G. Panati, 2012) Assume that H has a Z N -symmetry, then: (i) a Bloch-Floquet (type) unitary decomposition exists: H T N dt H (t), f (H) T N dt f (H) t ; (ii) if p C ( σ(h) ) such that p(h) = p(h) 2 (gap condition) then: π : E (p) T N, E (p) = [p(h) t H (t)] t T N is a Hermitian vector (Hilbert) bundle which is uniquely determined.

Topology of the Bloch-bundle Topology of the total space: U (t,ψ) (O,ε) := { (t,ψ ) : t O, ψ H p (t ), ψ ψ < ε } with O t any neighborhood and H p (t ) := p(h) t H (t ).

Topology of the Bloch-bundle Bloch functions and continuous sections: ψ : t H p (t) is norm-continuous and T N -periodic iff ψ Γ [ E (p) ] (continuous sections).

Topology of the Bloch-bundle Continuous Bloch-frame: {ψ 1,...,ψ m } Γ [ E (p) ] (orth.) basis of H p(t), t T N, m := rk [ E (p) ] There exists iff E (p) is trivial.

Topology of the Bloch-bundle Oka s principle: continuous Bloch-frame analytic Bloch-frame The base space T N is a Stein manifold.

Periodic Schrödinger operators H = L 2 (R d ), U(n)ψ(x) = ψ(x n), n Z d, ψ L 2 (R d ), H = H(x, i x ) translation invariant (Z d -symmetry). The rank of the Bloch-bundle π : E (p) T d agrees with the number of the energy bands selected by the gap.

Periodic Schrödinger operators H = L 2 (R d ), U(n)ψ(x) = ψ(x n), n Z d, ψ L 2 (R d ), H = H(x, i x ) translation invariant (Z d -symmetry). The rank of the Bloch-bundle π : E (p) T d agrees with the number of the energy bands selected by the gap.

Periodic Schrödinger operators H = L 2 (R d ), U(n)ψ(x) = ψ(x n), n Z d, ψ L 2 (R d ), H = H(x, i x ) translation invariant (Z d -symmetry). The rank of the Bloch-bundle π : E (p) T d agrees with the number of the energy bands selected by the gap.

Triviality of the Bloch-bundle DEFINITION Let H = H(x, i x ) be a Z d -translationary invariant Schrödinger operator acting on L 2 (R d ) and p(h) be a spectral projector in a gap which selects m (crossing) bands. The associated Bloch-bundle π : E (p) T d is trivial iff E (p) T d C m.

Triviality of the Bloch-bundle DEFINITION Let H = H(x, i x ) be a Z d -translationary invariant Schrödinger operator acting on L 2 (R d ) and p(h) be a spectral projector in a gap which selects m (crossing) bands. The associated Bloch-bundle π : E (p) T d is trivial iff E (p) T d C m. THEOREM (F. B. Peterson, 1959) Let π : E T d be a rank m Hermitian vector bundle which satisfies d 2m, (stable rank condition). Then E is trivial iff all the Chern classes c j [E ] H 2j (T d,z), with j = 1,..., d/2, are trivial. Moreover d = 1 triviality.

Triviality of the Bloch-bundle DEFINITION Let H = H(x, i x ) be a Z d -translationary invariant Schrödinger operator acting on L 2 (R d ) and p(h) be a spectral projector in a gap which selects m (crossing) bands. The associated Bloch-bundle π : E (p) T d is trivial iff E (p) T d C m. Consequences of the triviality: Existence of an exponentially localized system of Wannier functions for the subspace H p = p(h) L 2 (R d ); Let H ε be an adiabatic perturbation such that H = H ε=0, then one can construct an effective operator h ε eff (H ε,p) = p(h) U ε H ε U 1 ε p(h) + O(ε ).

Exponentially localized Wannier system H periodic, Σ σ(h) gapped energy band, p Σ spec. projection.

Exponentially localized Wannier system H periodic, Σ σ(h) gapped energy band, p Σ spec. projection. Bloch-Floquet (or Wannier) decomposition: L 2 (R d ) W dk L 2 W...W 1 (V ), p Σ T d T d dk p Σ (k).

Exponentially localized Wannier system H periodic, Σ σ(h) gapped energy band, p Σ spec. projection. Bloch-Floquet (or Wannier) decomposition: L 2 (R d ) W Generalized Bloch frame: dk L 2 W...W 1 (V ), p Σ T d ψ j : T d L 2 (V ), s.t. p Σ (k) = with m = Tr L 2 (V )[ pσ (k) ]. m j=1 T d dk p Σ (k). ψ j (k) ψ j (k)

Exponentially localized Wannier system H periodic, Σ σ(h) gapped energy band, p Σ spec. projection. Bloch-Floquet (or Wannier) decomposition: L 2 (R d ) W Generalized Bloch frame: dk L 2 W...W 1 (V ), p Σ T d ψ j : T d L 2 (V ), s.t. p Σ (k) = with m = Tr L 2 (V )[ pσ (k) ]. Wannier system for Σ: Let w (j) r m j=1 T d dk p Σ (k). ψ j (k) ψ j (k) {w (1),...,w (m) } L 2 (R d ) w (j) := W 1 [ψ j ]. := U(r)w (j), then w (i) s ;w (j) r L 2 (R d ) = δ ij δ sr

Exponentially localized Wannier system Completeness: p Σ H p Σ = = m i,j=1 m i,j=1 p Σ = m h (i,j) s r w (i) s s,r Z d ( s Z d h (i,j) w (j) n j=1 n Z d w (j) r 0 w (i) s w (j) w (j) n s + s r =1 where h (i,j) s r := U(s r) w (i) ;H w (j) L 2 (R d ). h (i,j) 1 w (i) s w (j) r +... )

Exponentially localized Wannier system Completeness: p Σ H p Σ = = m i,j=1 m i,j=1 p Σ = m h (i,j) s r w (i) s s,r Z d ( s Z d h (i,j) w (j) n j=1 n Z d w (j) r 0 w (i) s w (j) w (j) n s + s r =1 where h (i,j) s r := U(s r) w (i) ;H w (j) L 2 (R d ). Exponentially localized Wannier functions: sup r Z d χ K r w (j) L 2 (R d ) eb r < + for some b > 0 and for some compact K R d. h (i,j) 1 w (i) s w (j) r +... )

Exponentially localized Wannier system Localization vs. triviality: Exp. loc. Wannier system {w (1),...,w (m) } Analytic Bloch frame {ψ 1,...,ψ m } Triviality of Bloch bundle E T d. (Paley-Wiener theorem) (Oka s principle)

Exponentially localized Wannier system Localization vs. triviality: Exp. loc. Wannier system {w (1),...,w (m) } Analytic Bloch frame {ψ 1,...,ψ m } Triviality of Bloch bundle E T d. (Paley-Wiener theorem) (Oka s principle) Effective tight-binding model: If the Wannier system is Exp. loc., then h (i,j) l 1 if l 1 p Σ H p Σ m i,j=1 h (i,j) 0 ( s Z d h (i,j) 0 w (i) s w (j) s ) + small errors

The rôle of the time-reversal symmetry Let H per be the Z d -periodic Schrödinger operator on L 2 (R d ) H per = 1 2 x + V, [V ;U(n)] = 0, n Z d with V real and sufficiently regular. Let (Cψ)(x) = ψ(x) the time-reversal (anti-unitary) operator.

The rôle of the time-reversal symmetry Let H per be the Z d -periodic Schrödinger operator on L 2 (R d ) H per = 1 2 x + V, [V ;U(n)] = 0, n Z d with V real and sufficiently regular. Let (Cψ)(x) = ψ(x) the time-reversal (anti-unitary) operator. Then [C;H per ] = 0, (time-reversal symmetry). THEOREM (B. Simon, 1983; G. Panati, 2007) Let p(h per ) be a spectral projector in a gap which selects m bands and π : E (p) T d the related Bloch-bundle. Then c 1 [ E (p)] = 0.

The rôle of the time-reversal symmetry Let H per be the Z d -periodic Schrödinger operator on L 2 (R d ) H per = 1 2 x + V, [V ;U(n)] = 0, n Z d with V real and sufficiently regular. Let (Cψ)(x) = ψ(x) the time-reversal (anti-unitary) operator. Consequences of the Peterson s Thorem: d=1: E (p) is trivial for any rank m (W. Kohn, 1959). Very special case: i) C plays no rôle; ii) no magnetic field; m=1: E (p) is trivial for any spatial dimension d (G. Nenciu, 1983; B. Helffer & J. Sjöstrand, 1989): Lin(T d c ) 1 H 1 (T d,z); d=2,3: E (p) is trivial for any rank m > 1 (G. Panati, 2007). Stable rank condition verified and d/2 = 1; d=4: stable rank condition verified if m > 1 but c 2 [ E (p)] =?; d>5: if d > 2m the analysis of Chern classes does not suffice.

Magnetic symmetries Let Hper A be the Z d -periodic magnetic Schrödinger operator Hper A = 1 ( i x + A ) 2 + V, [Aj ;U(n)] = 0, n Z d 2 with V = A 0,A = (A 1,...,A d ) real and sufficiently regular.

Magnetic symmetries Let Hper A be the Z d -periodic magnetic Schrödinger operator Hper A = 1 ( i x + A ) 2 + V, [Aj ;U(n)] = 0, n Z d 2 with V = A 0,A = (A 1,...,A d ) real and sufficiently regular. Since the presence of A [C;Hper] A 0, (breaking of the time-reversal symmetry). Main question: Is it possible to recover a new (anti-unitary) symmetry C A such that [C A ;H A per] = 0? If yes, the full analysis valid for A = 0 should be still valid!

Magnetic symmetries Let H A per be the Z d -periodic magnetic Schrödinger operator Hper A = 1 ( i x + A ) 2 + V, [Aj ;U(n)] = 0, n Z d 2 with V = A 0,A = (A 1,...,A d ) real and sufficiently regular. THEOREM (G. D. & M. Lein, 2011) Let R O(R d ) and U R unitary (resp. anti-unitary) on L 2 (R d ) such that: a) if V is an operator of multiplication then the same holds for U R V U 1 R ; b) U R x U 1 R = R x. Consider the unitary (resp. anti-unitary) operator UR A = Φ A U R where ( ΦA ψ ) (x) = e i [0,x] f R;A(y) dy ψ(x) with f R;A = R 1 (U R A U 1 ) R A. Then (i) UR A ( i x + A ) UR A 1 ( = R i x + A ) ; (ii) [U R ;V ] = 0 [UR A;HA per] = 0.

Magnetic parity and magnetic time-reversal symmetry Magnetic parity: Let (Πψ)(x) = ψ( x) be the parity operator: (Π A ψ)(x) = e +i [ ] [0,x] A(y)+A( y) dy ψ( x). Magnetic time-reversal symmetry: Let (Cψ)(x) = ψ(x): (C A ψ)(x) = e i2 [0,x] A(y) dy ψ(x).

Magnetic parity and magnetic time-reversal symmetry Magnetic parity: Let (Πψ)(x) = ψ( x) be the parity operator: (Π A ψ)(x) = e +i [ ] [0,x] A(y)+A( y) dy ψ( x). Magnetic time-reversal symmetry: Let (Cψ)(x) = ψ(x): (C A ψ)(x) = e i2 [0,x] A(y) dy ψ(x). Since V is real [C A ;H A per] = 0; If V (x) = V ( x) (center of inversion) [Π A ;H A per] = 0; If A is Z d -periodic [C A ;U(n)] = 0 = [Π A ;U(n)] for all n Z d (hence they factorize through the Bloch-Floquet transform).

Magnetic parity and magnetic time-reversal symmetry Magnetic parity: Let (Πψ)(x) = ψ( x) be the parity operator: (Π A ψ)(x) = e +i [ ] [0,x] A(y)+A( y) dy ψ( x). Magnetic time-reversal symmetry: Let (Cψ)(x) = ψ(x): (C A ψ)(x) = e i2 [0,x] A(y) dy ψ(x). THEOREM (G. D. & M. Lein, 2011) Let A,V be Z d -periodic, p(h A per) a projector for m bands and E (p) the associated rank m Bloch-bundle. Then: (i) E (p) f E (p), where f (z) = z for all z T d ; (ii) E (p) E (p) if in addition V (x) = V ( x). Moreover, both (i) or (ii) suffice to prove that: c 2j 1 [ E (p) ] = 0, j = 1,..., d/2.

Open problems and prospects d = 4 is the last case saturating the stable rank condition. The triviality of the Bloch-bundle for m (crossing) bands (with projection p) is implied by c 2 = 0 or equivalently 1 lim L 4 Tr( ) χ L W p χ L = 0 L where χ L is the indicator function of [ L/2,L/2] 4, and W p = δ 12 (p)δ 34 (p) δ 13 (p)δ 24 (p) + δ 14 (p)δ 23 (p) with δ ij (p) = (2π) 2[ [x i ;p];[x j ;p] ].

Open problems and prospects d = 4 is the last case saturating the stable rank condition. The triviality of the Bloch-bundle for m (crossing) bands (with projection p) is implied by c 2 = 0 or equivalently 1 lim L 4 Tr( ) χ L W p χ L = 0 L where χ L is the indicator function of [ L/2,L/2] 4, and W p = δ 12 (p)δ 34 (p) δ 13 (p)δ 24 (p) + δ 14 (p)δ 23 (p) with δ ij (p) = (2π) 2[ [x i ;p];[x j ;p] ]. The discrete case seems to escape the previous analysis. Haldane showed a discrete model with zero-flux magnetic field and non-zero Chern charges (F. D. M. Haldane, 1988).

Open problems and prospects d = 4 is the last case saturating the stable rank condition. The triviality of the Bloch-bundle for m (crossing) bands (with projection p) is implied by c 2 = 0 or equivalently 1 lim L 4 Tr( ) χ L W p χ L = 0 L where χ L is the indicator function of [ L/2,L/2] 4, and W p = δ 12 (p)δ 34 (p) δ 13 (p)δ 24 (p) + δ 14 (p)δ 23 (p) with δ ij (p) = (2π) 2[ [x i ;p];[x j ;p] ]. The discrete case seems to escape the previous analysis. Haldane showed a discrete model with zero-flux magnetic field and non-zero Chern charges (F. D. M. Haldane, 1988). It is expected that the magnetic rotations could play for the QHE on S 2 (Dirac monopol) the same rôle that the magnetic translations play for the QHE on R 2. Link with the non-commutative spheres.

! Thank you for your attention!