MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design

Similar documents
MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Orbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Course Overview/Orbital Mechanics

Robotic Mobility Above the Surface

Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers

Orbit Characteristics

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

Robotic Mobility Above the Surface

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Extending the Patched-Conic Approximation to the Restricted Four-Body Problem

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Patch Conics. Basic Approach

Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications

Interplanetary Mission Opportunities

The Astrodynamics and Mechanics of Orbital Spaceflight

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Previous Lecture. Approximate solutions for the motion about an oblate planet: The Brouwer model. The Cid- Lahulla model 2 / 39

Celestial Mechanics Lecture 10

Previous Lecture. Orbital maneuvers: general framework. Single-impulse maneuver: compatibility conditions

Lesson 11: Orbital Transfers II. 10/6/2016 Robin Wordsworth ES 160: Space Science and Engineering: Theory and ApplicaCons

Orbital Mechanics! Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University! Robert Stengel

Astromechanics. 6. Changing Orbits

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great Pearson Education, Inc.

Optimal Gravity Assisted Orbit Insertion for Europa Orbiter Mission

Seminar 3! Precursors to Space Flight! Orbital Motion!

Lecture 22: Gravitational Orbits

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

Effect of Coordinate Switching on Translunar Trajectory Simulation Accuracy

SUN INFLUENCE ON TWO-IMPULSIVE EARTH-TO-MOON TRANSFERS. Sandro da Silva Fernandes. Cleverson Maranhão Porto Marinho

Celestial Mechanics and Satellite Orbits

Satellite Communications

Rate of area swept by the radial vector from the centre of the orbit. Rate of area swept by the radial vector from the centre of the earth

Optimal Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Lagrange Multipliers

ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Prox Ops, Lambert

Study of LEO to GEO transfers via the L1 Sun-Earth or Earth-Moon libration points

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control

ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary

Astromechanics. 10. The Kepler Problem

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

arxiv:physics/ v2 [physics.gen-ph] 2 Dec 2003

Chapter 8. Precise Lunar Gravity Assist Trajectories. to Geo-stationary Orbits

CHANGING INCLINATION OF EARTH SATELLITES USING THE GRAVITY OF THE MOON

Introduction to Astronomy

5.12 The Aerodynamic Assist Trajectories of Vehicles Propelled by Solar Radiation Pressure References...

AST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements

The B-Plane Interplanetary Mission Design

Session 6: Analytical Approximations for Low Thrust Maneuvers

2. The line joining the planet to the Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times.

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

ORBITS WRITTEN Q.E. (June 2012) Each of the five problems is valued at 20 points. (Total for exam: 100 points)

Lecture 15 - Orbit Problems

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

Newton s Gravitational Law

Powered Space Flight

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

10 Orbit and Constellation Design Selecting the Right Orbit

On The Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Energy Concepts Part I

Resonance Hopping Transfers Between Moon Science Orbits

A Study of the Close Approach Between a Planet and a Cloud of Particles

Chapter 13. Gravitation

Supplemental Questions 12U

AP Physics QUIZ Gravitation

Chapter 2: Orbits and Launching Methods

Astronomy 111 Review Problems Solutions

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

Gravitational Potential Energy and Total Energy *

ASEN 6008: Interplanetary Mission Design Lab Spring, 2015

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

Swing-By Maneuvers for a Cloud of Particles with Planets of the Solar System

Chapter 6 Gravitation and Newton s Synthesis

GRAVITATION. F = GmM R 2

Celestial Mechanics II. Orbital energy and angular momentum Elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic orbits Position in the orbit versus time

A SIMULATION OF THE MOTION OF AN EARTH BOUND SATELLITE

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

PSI AP Physics 1 Gravitation

History. Geocentric model (Ptolemy) Heliocentric model (Aristarchus of Samos)

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Introduction to Satellite Orbits

ANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS

A study of trajectories to the Neptune system using gravity assists

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

Orbital Transfer Trajectory Optimization. James K Whiting

MINIMUM IMPULSE TRANSFERS TO ROTATE THE LINE OF APSIDES

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS DUE TO THE THREE DIMENSIONAL SWING-BY IN THE SUN-JUPITER SYSTEM

Chapter 13. Universal Gravitation

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

PATHFINDING AND V-INFININTY LEVERAGING FOR PLANETARY MOON TOUR MISSIONS

Newton s Laws and the Nature of Matter

Observational Astronomy - Lecture 4 Orbits, Motions, Kepler s and Newton s Laws

Transcription:

Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time and flight path angle as a function of orbital position Relative orbital motion ( proximity operations ) 2003 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl. umd.edu

Energy in Orbit Kinetic Energy Potential Energy Total Energy <--Vis-Viva Equation

Implications of Vis-Viva Circular orbit (r=a) Parabolic escape orbit (a tends to infinity) Relationship between circular and parabolic orbits

Some Useful Constants Gravitation constant µ = GM Earth: 398,604 km 3 /sec 2 Moon: 4667.9 km 3 /sec 2 Mars: 42,970 km 3 /sec 2 Sun: 1.327x10 11 km 3 /sec 2 Planetary radii r Earth = 6378 km r Moon = 1738 km r Mars = 3393 km

Classical Parameters of Elliptical Orbits

Basic Orbital Parameters Semi-latus rectum (or parameter) Radial distance as function of orbital position Periapse and apoapse distances Angular momentum

The Classical Orbital Elements Ref: J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Oxford University Press, 1993

The Hohmann Transfer v 2 v apogee v 1 v perigee

First Maneuver Velocities Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V

Second Maneuver Velocities Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V

Limitations on Launch Inclinations

Differences in Inclination

Choosing the Wrong Line of Apsides

Simple Plane Change Δv 2 v perigee v 1 v apogee v 2

Optimal Plane Change v perigee v 1 v apogee Dv 1 Dv 2 v 2

First Maneuver with Plane Change Δi 1 Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V

Second Maneuver with Plane Change Δi 2 Initial vehicle velocity Needed final velocity Delta-V

Sample Plane Change Maneuver Optimum initial plane change = 2.20

Bielliptic Transfer

Coplanar Transfer Velocity Requirements Ref: J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Oxford University Press, 1993

Noncoplanar Bielliptic Transfers

Calculating Time in Orbit

Time in Orbit Period of an orbit Mean motion (average angular velocity) Time since pericenter passage å M=mean anomaly

Dealing with the Eccentric Anomaly Relationship to orbit Relationship to true anomaly Calculating M from time interval: iterate until it converges

Example: Time in Orbit Hohmann transfer from LEO to GEO h 1 =300 km --> r 1 =6378+300=6678 km r 2 =42240 km Time of transit (1/2 orbital period)

Example: Time-based Position Find the spacecraft position 3 hours after perigee E=0; 1.783; 2.494; 2.222; 2.361; 2.294; 2.328; 2.311; 2.320; 2.316; 2.318; 2.317; 2.317; 2.317

Example: Time-based Position (continued) Have to be sure to get the position in the proper quadrant - since the time is less than 1/2 the period, the spacecraft has yet to reach apogee --> 0 <q<180

Velocity Components in Orbit

Velocity Components in Orbit (continued)

Patched Conics Simple approximation to multi-body motion (e.g., traveling from Earth orbit through solar orbit into Martian orbit) Treats multibody problem as hand-offs between gravitating bodies --> reduces analysis to sequential two-body problems Caveat Emptor: There are a number of formal methods to perform patched conic analysis. The approach presented here is a very simple, convenient, and not altogether accurate method for performing this calculation. Results will be accurate to a few percent, which is adequate at this level of design analysis.

Example: Lunar Orbit Insertion v 2 is velocity of moon around Earth Moon overtakes spacecraft with velocity of (v 2 -v apogee ) This is the velocity of the spacecraft relative to the moon while it is effectively infinitely far away (before lunar gravity accelerates it) = hyperbolic excess velocity v 2 v apogee

Planetary Approach Analysis Spacecraft has v h hyperbolic excess velocity, which fixes total energy of approach orbit Vis-viva provides velocity of approach Choose transfer orbit such that approach is tangent to desired final orbit at periapse

ΔV Requirements for Lunar Missions UMd Exploration Initiative Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland

Hill s Equations (Proximity Operations) Ref: J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Oxford University Press, 1993

Clohessy-Wiltshire ( CW ) Equations

V-Bar Approach Ref: Collins, Meissinger, and Bell, Small Orbit Transfer Vehicle (OTV) for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing and Resupply, 15th USU Small Satellite Conference, 2001

R-Bar Approach Approach from along the radius vector ( Rbar ) Gravity gradients decelerate spacecraft approach velocity - low contamination approach Used for Mir, ISS docking approaches Ref: Collins, Meissinger, and Bell, Small Orbit Transfer Vehicle (OTV) for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing and Resupply, 15th USU Small Satellite Conference, 2001

References for Lecture 3 Wernher von Braun, The Mars Project University of Illinois Press, 1962 William Tyrrell Thomson, Introduction to Space Dynamics Dover Publications, 1986 Francis J. Hale, Introduction to Space Flight Prentice-Hall, 1994 William E. Wiesel, Spaceflight Dynamics MacGraw-Hill, 1997 J. E. Prussing and B. A. Conway, Orbital Mechanics Oxford University Press, 1993