FHWA Peer Exchange Meeting on Transportation Systems Management during Inclement Weather

Similar documents
3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Mobile Source Emissions due to the Interactions between Land-use and Regional Transportation Systems

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transportation Technical Report. Appendix E. Travel Demand Forecasting Model Validation Memorandum

MPOs SB 375 LAFCOs SCAG Practices/Experiences And Future Collaborations with LAFCOs

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

2015 Grand Forks East Grand Forks TDM

Regional Performance Measures

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

2014 Certification Review Regional Data & Modeling

Regional Performance Measures

Land Use Advisory Committee. Updating the Transit Market Areas

2040 MTP and CTP Socioeconomic Data

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

Using GIS to Determine Goodness of Fit for Functional Classification. Eric Foster NWMSU MoDOT

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

The I-81 Challenge: Study update and overview of travel demand model CNY Engineering Expo November 12, 2012

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

Figure 8.2a Variation of suburban character, transit access and pedestrian accessibility by TAZ label in the study area

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

APPENDIX C-6 - TRAFFIC MODELING REPORT, SRF CONSULTING GROUP

Integrating Origin and Destination (OD) Study into GIS in Support of LIRR Services and Network Improvements

Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools

Overview of Improved Data and Tools for Integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning in California Caltrans Planning Horizons program November 7, 2012

SBCAG Travel Model Upgrade Project 3rd Model TAC Meeting. Jim Lam, Stewart Berry, Srini Sundaram, Caliper Corporation December.

Traffic Demand Forecast

APPENDIX G Halton Region Transportation Model

Travel Demand Model Report City of Peterborough Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Supporting Document

Cipra D. Revised Submittal 1

Uses of Travel Demand Models Beyond the MTP. Janie Temple Transportation Planning and Programming Division

An Integrated Approach to Statewide Travel Modeling Applications in Delaware

Land Use Modeling at ABAG. Mike Reilly October 3, 2011

Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director

APPENDIX C-3 Equitable Target Areas (ETA) Technical Analysis Methodology

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

Transit Market Index. Validating Local Potential for Transit Ridership

Douglas County/Carson City Travel Demand Model

Simplified Trips-on-Project Software (STOPS): Strategies for Successful Application

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

2011 South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process. Executive Summary

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

Thompson-Graves, S., DuRoss, M., Subhani, R., Sundquist, E., Holloway, B. 1. Corresponding Author: Scott Thompson-Graves, PE

North Jersey Regional Transportation Model- Enhanced Transportation Modeling Overview May 19, 2008

Analyzing the Market Share of Commuter Rail Stations using LEHD Data

Economic and Social Urban Indicators: A Spatial Decision Support System for Chicago Area Transportation Planning

How GIS based Visualizations Support Land Use and Transportation Modeling

Alternatives Analysis

ADDRESSING TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

Palmerston North Area Traffic Model

Developing and Validating Regional Travel Forecasting Models with CTPP Data: MAG Experience

Network Equilibrium Models: Varied and Ambitious

The 2030 Travel Forecast for Santa Barbara County

COMBINATION OF MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC TRANSPORT SIMULATION MODELS: USE CASE IN CYPRUS

Taming the Modeling Monster

Environmental Justice Areas with 2040 Roads

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: July 3, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: 7

final report A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida Florida Department of Transportation Systems Planning Office

Public Open House Meeting Thursday, February 22, Broken Arrow to Tulsa Mass Transit Feasibility Study

Data Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

Data for transport planning and management Why integration and management? Issues in transport data integration

FHWA Planning Data Resources: Census Data Planning Products (CTPP) HEPGIS Interactive Mapping Portal

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

Typical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.

Com munity Advisor y C ommitte e Meeting

TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL. Chapter 6

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

GIS ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report

Status Report: Ongoing review of O-D cellular data for the TPB modeled area

Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM) Version 6.0

Employment Decentralization and Commuting in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Symposium on the Work of Leon Moses

Speakers: Jeff Price, Federal Transit Administration Linda Young, Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Center for Neighborhood Technology

Service Area Analysis of Portland's METRO Bus System. Andy Smith-Petersen, University of Southern Maine -

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors]

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006

Appendix C Traffic Study

A Joint Tour-Based Model of Vehicle Type Choice and Tour Length

Big Data Analysis to Measure Delays of Canadian Domestic and Cross-Border Truck Trips

November 16, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

Appendix B. Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation

Understanding Land Use and Walk Behavior in Utah

Sketch Transit Modeling Based on 2000 Census Data. Norm Marshall and Brian Grady. Norm Marshall

GIS and Remote Sensing Support for Evacuation Analysis

The effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion in Florida

SANDAG. Transportation Modeling Forum

Local Economic Activity Around Rapid Transit Stations

Project Objectives/Outcomes

December 2017 MCTRA 249 TOLLWAY COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC & REVENUE STUDY. Submitted by:

Regional Growth Strategy Work Session Growth Management Policy Board

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Advancing Urban Models in the 21 st Century. Jeff Tayman Lecturer, Dept. of Economics University of California, San Diego

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/1. Final Report. Jon D. Fricker Maria Martchouk

Dimantha I De Silva (corresponding), HBA Specto Incorporated

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report OKALOOSA-WALTON OUTLOOK 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Transcription:

Travel Demand Modeling & Simulation at GBNRTC Matt Grabau Kimberly Smith Mike Davis Why Model? Travel modeling is a tool for transportation planners and policy makers, to observe impacts of a transportation project before it is built. Impacts: Changes in existing / future traffic volume Observing shifts in traffic patterns Impacts on the environment We can model base-year and future-year conditions We can use what we learn from our model to better shape our plans to improve transportation within the region. Presentation 01 1 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

Models Used at GBNRTC 4-Step Regional TDM Model Meso/Micro Simulation Model Activity-Based Model GBNRTC s Regional Travel Demand Model Perform regional and corridor-level analysis for various transportation projects. Obtain regional traffic forecasts (for short-term term and long-term) Measure impacts to base year conditions How will traffic look in 5 years, 10 years, 30 years? Long Range Plan (LRP) 20-year blueprint that addresses transportation needs for the region Transportation Improvement Program Implements the first 5 years of the LRP using capital funds Means of prioritizing LRP projects with the funds available Air Quality Emissions Analysis Satisfy EPA guidelines, monitor NOx and VOC Presentation 01 2 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

GBNRTC s jurisdiction is divided into 554 TAZs The shape and size of a TAZ is determined by several factors Census block boundaries Municipal boundaries Follow geometry of major / minor arterials Follow geometry of natural boundaries Population density (Population should be distributed evenly among TAZs. Areas of greater density will have smaller TAZs) U.S. Census block data is aggregated into TAZ boundaries, including: Population Number of households Median household income Employment by industry School enrollment Other special uses Shopping malls, Universities, Airports TDM Road Network Our model network includes all federal-aid aid roads within the GBNRTC jurisdiction and includes crossings into Canada. Presentation 01 3 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

Public Transit Network Public transit network represents NFTA s current route structure. Other Required Input Household Travel Survey GBNRTC s last survey was completed in 2002 TDM needs to understand d where trips need to go based on actual travel patterns develops household-level level cross-classification classification model to estimate trips between zones. Traffic Counts Transit ridership data Boarding and alighting per stop / station Presentation 01 4 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

Useful outputs from TDM Traffic volumes Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Peak Hour / Peak Period Volumes Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) Changes in travel patterns between scenarios Select Link Analysis Shortest Path Analysis Useful Outputs from TDM Modeled Link Volumes Presentation 01 5 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

Useful Outputs from TDM Useful Outputs from TDM Presentation 01 6 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

Cleveland Drive Ramp Study Alternative 2 Both Ramps Closed Cleveland Drive Ramp Study Alternative 4 SB On Ramp Closed Presentation 01 7 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

UB 2020 UB 2020 Impact on network due to UB s investment t in region Depicting increase in ADT Presentation 01 8 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

UB 2020 Impact to ADT due to UB s investment in region Area ideal for Meso Network, further network refinements and microsimulation TRANSIMS Presentation 01 9 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

South Grand Island Toll Plaza No Delay Condition (During typical PM time period) Changes in Daily Flows Lewiston/Queenston Bridge WB + 151 Trips (2%) Porter Rd -360 Trips (2%) Niagara Falls Blvd -227 Trips (1%) River Rd -530 Trips (3%) South Grand Island Tolls NB +1100 Trips (3%) Peace Bridge WB -219 Trips (1%) Presentation 01 10 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

Accelerated Growth in Truck Traffic Change in Truck Flow Presentation 01 11 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012

Change in Auto Flow Presentation 01 12 Buffalo, NY March 15, 2012