Belarus activity in ADS field

Similar documents
The investigations in the field of advanced nuclear power systems for energy production and transmutation of RAW in NAS of Belarus

Reactivity Monitoring with Imposed Beam Trips and Pulsed Mode Detectors in the Subcritical Experiment YALINA-Booster

YALINA-Booster Conversion Project

Reactivity monitoring of a subcritical assembly using beam-trips and current-mode fission chambers: The Yalina-Booster program

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies May Transmutation Systems

Division of Nuclear Fission, CIEMAT, Avenida Complutense 40, Madrid, Spain

The Lead-Based VENUS-F Facility: Status of the FREYA Project

Benchmark Experiments of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) in Kyoto University Critical Assembly (KUCA)

Neutronic Issues and Ways to Resolve Them. P.A. Fomichenko National Research Center Kurchatov Institute Yu.P. Sukharev JSC Afrikantov OKBM,

Reactivity Assessment in Subcritical Systems CARL-MAGNUS PERSSON

Institute of Atomic Energy POLATOM OTWOCK-SWIERK POLAND. Irradiations of HEU targets in MARIA RR for Mo-99 production. G.

USA HTR NEUTRONIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SAFARI-1 MATERIAL TESTING REACTOR

Fuel Element Burnup Determination in HEU - LEU Mixed TRIGA Research Reactor Core

Reactor Physics Calculations for a Sub critical Core of the IPEN-MB-01 driven by an external neutron source

MUSE-4 BENCHMARK CALCULATIONS USING MCNP-4C AND DIFFERENT NUCLEAR DATA LIBRARIES

Error Estimation for ADS Nuclear Properties by using Nuclear Data Covariances

1. INTRODUCTION 2. EAEA EXISTING CAPABILITIES AND FACILITIES

CRITICAL LOADING CONFIGURATIONS OF THE IPEN/MB-01 REACTOR WITH UO 2 GD 2 O 3 BURNABLE POISON RODS

Neutronic Calculations of Ghana Research Reactor-1 LEU Core

Operational Reactor Safety

D. Cano Ott Nuclear Innovation Nuclear Fission Division Dept. of Energy. CIEMAT-IFIC-UPC collaboration

Study on SiC Components to Improve the Neutron Economy in HTGR

Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics

Power Installations based on Activated Nuclear Reactions of Fission and Synthesis

Nuclear waste management

STEK experiment Opportunity for Validation of Fission Products Nuclear Data

VERIFICATION OFENDF/B-VII.0, ENDF/B-VII.1 AND JENDL-4.0 NUCLEAR DATA LIBRARIES FOR CRITICALITY CALCULATIONS USING NEA/NSC BENCHMARKS

Quiz, Physics & Chemistry

Experiments using transmutation set-ups. Speaker : Wolfram Westmeier for

Adaptation of Pb-Bi Cooled, Metal Fuel Subcritical Reactor for Use with a Tokamak Fusion Neutron Source

Hybrid Low-Power Research Reactor with Separable Core Concept

Reactivity monitoring using the Area method for the subcritical VENUS-F core within the framework of the FREYA project

Status of J-PARC Transmutation Experimental Facility

Analysis of the TRIGA Reactor Benchmarks with TRIPOLI 4.4

The MYRRHA ADS project

A TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT ENDF/B-VI.8 ACE LIBRARY FOR UO2, THO2, ZIRC4, SS AISI-348, H2O, B4C AND AG-IN-CD

Prompt Alpha Calculation With Monte Carlo Code JMCT

Fuel cycle studies on minor actinide transmutation in Generation IV fast reactors

Delayed Neutrons Energy Spectrum Flux Profile of Nuclear Materials in Ghana s Miniature Neutron Source Reactor Core

GUINEVERE: construction of a zero-power Pb fast ADS at Mol

NORArAN INTERNATIONAL PROJECT IN REACTOR PHYSICS

Evaluation of Radiation Characteristics of Spent RBMK-1500 Nuclear Fuel Storage Casks during Very Long Term Storage

PULSED NEUTRON SOURCE MEASUREMENTS OF KINETIC PARAMETERS IN THE SOURCE-DRIVEN FAST SUBCRITICAL CORE MASURCA

REACTOR PHYSICS ASPECTS OF PLUTONIUM RECYCLING IN PWRs

MONTE CALRLO MODELLING OF VOID COEFFICIENT OF REACTIVITY EXPERIMENT

Ciclo combustibile, scorie, accelerator driven system

Troitsk ADS project S.Sidorkin, E.Koptelov, L.Kravchuk, A.Rogov

Estimation of Control Rods Worth for WWR-S Research Reactor Using WIMS-D4 and CITATION Codes

Working Party on Pu-MOX fuel physics and innovative fuel cycles (WPPR)

PRELIMINARY CONCEPT OF A ZERO POWER NUCLEAR REACTOR CORE

OECD/NEA Transient Benchmark Analysis with PARCS - THERMIX

Research Article Analysis of NEA-NSC PWR Uncontrolled Control Rod Withdrawal at Zero Power Benchmark Cases with NODAL3 Code

Study of Control rod worth in the TMSR

Profile SFR-64 BFS-2. RUSSIA

THREE-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRAL NEUTRON TRANSPORT CELL CALCULATIONS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MEAN CELL CROSS SECTIONS

Investigation of Nuclear Data Accuracy for the Accelerator- Driven System with Minor Actinide Fuel

Utilization of the Irradiation Holes in HANARO

(CE~RN, G!E21ZZMA?ZOEWSPRC)

THORIUM SELF-SUFFICIENT FUEL CYCLE OF CANDU POWER REACTOR

TRANSMUTATION OF AMERICIUM AND CURIUM: REVIEW OF SOLUTIONS AND IMPACTS. Abstract

Effect of Fuel Particles Size Variations on Multiplication Factor in Pebble-Bed Nuclear Reactor

Technical Meeting on Priorities in Modeling and Simulation for Fast Neutron Systems 1

Invariability of neutron flux in internal and external irradiation sites in MNSRs for both HEU and LEU cores

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 71 (2015 )

turbine (a) (i) Which part of the power station provides thermal (heat) energy from a chain reaction?

Cold Critical Pre-Experiment Simulations of KRUSTy

A Dummy Core for V&V and Education & Training Purposes at TechnicAtome: In and Ex-Core Calculations

Simulating the Behaviour of the Fast Reactor JOYO

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 1. Title: Neutron Life Cycle

Neutron Dose near Spent Nuclear Fuel and HAW after the 2007 ICRP Recommendations

Lecture 14, 8/9/2017. Nuclear Reactions and the Transmutation of Elements Nuclear Fission; Nuclear Reactors Nuclear Fusion

Benchmark Experiment for Fast Neutron Spectrum Potassium Worth Validation in Space Power Reactor Design

Subcritical Multiplication and Reactor Startup

DESIGN OF B 4 C BURNABLE PARTICLES MIXED IN LEU FUEL FOR HTRS

VI. Chain Reaction. Two basic requirements must be filled in order to produce power in a reactor:

The 2018 Edition of the ICSBEP Handbook

Scope and Objectives. Codes and Relevance. Topics. Which is better? Project Supervisor(s)

NEUTRONIC ANALYSIS STUDIES OF THE SPALLATION TARGET WINDOW FOR A GAS COOLED ADS CONCEPT.

Analysis of design, verification and optimization of High intensity positron source (HIPOS) at HFR Petten

Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Methodologies for Fast Reactor Physics and Design at JAEA

X. Neutron and Power Distribution

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com 1

Challenges in Prismatic HTR Reactor Physics

Analysis of High Enriched Uranyl Nitrate Solution Containing Cadmium

Advanced Heavy Water Reactor. Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA

The analysis of particles of nuclear material finding the proverbial needle in a hay stack

Chem 481 Lecture Material 4/22/09

Progress in Conceptual Research on Fusion Fission Hybrid Reactor for Energy (FFHR-E)

sustainable nuclear energy

Reactor-physical calculations using an MCAM based MCNP model of the Training Reactor of Budapest University of Technology and Economics

Optimization studies of photo-neutron production in high-z metallic targets using high energy electron beam for ADS and transmutation

PHYSICS A2 UNIT 2 SECTION 1: RADIOACTIVITY & NUCLEAR ENERGY

Chain Reactions. Table of Contents. List of Figures

A new method to acquire nuclear fission data using heavy ion reactions a way to understand the fission phenomenon

Study of the End Flux Peaking for the CANDU Fuel Bundle Types by Transport Methods

NUCLEAR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COURSES AS A COMMERCIAL PRODUCT OF A LOW POWER RESEARCH REACTOR

Report of Workshop on EXFOR Compilation 2014

Progress in Conceptual Research on Fusion Fission Hybrid Reactor for Energy

ASSESSMENT OF THE EQUILIBRIUM STATE IN REACTOR-BASED PLUTONIUM OR TRANSURANICS MULTI-RECYCLING

Neutron Multiplicity Measurements for the AFCI Program

Transcription:

Joint Institute for Power&Nuclear Research-Sosny National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Belarus activity in ADS field H. Kiyavitskaya, Yu. Fokov, Ch. Routkovskaya, V. Bournos, S. Sadovich, S. Mazanik, I. Edchik, A. Kulikovskaya (YALINA team) 45 th IAEA Meting TWG-FR, ANL, USA, 20-23 June 2012

Content Introduction International cooperation YALINA facility YALINA Booster assembly Obtained experience Conclusion

Introduction IAEA Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on Analytical and Experimental Benchmark Analysis of Accelerator Driven Systems Contract N0. 1389/R The YALINA-Thermal and YALINA-Booster benchmarks IAEA CRP Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Utilization in Accelerator Driven Sub- Critical Assembly Systems

Introduction (cont.) State program scientific investigations Nuclear Power, Nuclear and Radiation Technologies State program Scientific support of the development of nuclear power in the Republic of Belarus

International cooperation ISTC Projects B070 (EC), B1341 (USA), B1732P (USA) IP EUROTRANS EU Framework Programs The objectives of the ISTC Project #B1732P in collaboration with USA are: To use LEU fuel instead of HEU for the YALINA-Booster assembly; To evaluate the consequences of converting to LEU fuel (by enrichment <20%); To examine possible ways to maintain the original performance with HEU.

The YALINA facility: To develop the experimental techniques and adapt the existing ones for monitoring the sub-criticality level, neutron spectra measurements, etc; To study the spatial kinetics of sub-critical systems driven by external neutron sources; To study the maintenance and operating performance of ADS; To measure the transmutation reaction rates of minor-actinides and long-lived fission products.

YALINA facility

YALINA-Booster sub-critical assembly (to the left), neutron generator (to the right)

The ISTC Projects #B1341 and B1732P the experimental and theoretical studies were carried out to define the sub-critical YALINA-Booster performance in original configuration with 90% Umet+36% UO2 in fast zone and 10% UO2 in thermal zone the experimental and theoretical studies at configuration of YALINA-Booster with 36% UO2 in fast zone and 10% UO2 in thermal zone the experimental and theoretical studies at configuration of YALINA-Booster with 21% UO2 in fast zone and 10% UO2 in thermal zone (JIPNR-configuration) the experimental and theoretical studies at configuration of YALINA-Booster with 21% UO2 in fast zone and 10% UO2 in thermal zone (ANL configuration)

Fast zone of the YALINA-Booster assembly (rectangular and rounded geometry) D E F G H I D E F G H I 4 4 5 EC1B 5 EC1B 6 EC2B 6 EC2B 7 7 8 EC4B 8 EC4B EC3B EC3B 9 9 Ionguide Problem fuel channels (18) Absorber zone, 108 rods with Umet. (nat.) Absorber zone, 116 rods with B4C Fuel rods with UO 2, 21% enrichment by U-235 (601) Empty fuel channels (76) EC1B-EC3B - experimental channels in fast zone EC4B - experimental channel in fast zone Ionguide Absorber zone, 108 rods with Umet. (nat.) Absorber zone, 116 rods with B4C Fuel rods with UO 2, 21% enrichment by U-235 (595) Empty and problem fuel channels (100) sealed by hermetical SS tubes EC1B-EC3B - experimental channels in fast zone EC4B - experimental channel in fast zone

The obtained experience: The replacement of the 90% enriched metallic uranium fuel in the inner region of the fast zone by 36 % (first) and 21% (second) enriched uranium dioxide reduces the contribution of fast zone to the total reactivity of the assembly, softens slightly the neutron spectrum in the fast zone. The neutron spectrum in the thermal zone remains unchanged.

Conclusions The YALINA facility is a unique installation which was designed as a zero power model of real ADS. It is intended to study neutronics and kinetics of the sub-critical reactors driven by external neutron sources. The successful operation of this facility is a scientific contribution from the Republic of Belarus, as well as the international team from EC and USA. The experimental data are used to benchmark and validate methods and computer codes for designing and licensing ADS.

The facility generated valuable data in the following areas: investigation of spatial kinetics of the sub-critical systems with external neutron sources; validation of the experimental techniques for, e.g., sub-criticality monitoring, etc; estimation of probability of minor actinides and fission products transmutation; nuclear and radiation safety analyses of sub-critical systems driven by external neutron sources; neutron activation analysis; utilization of low enriched uranium fuel for studying accelerator driven sub-critical systems.

The YALINA-Booster experiments performed during and after the conversion of fast zone HEU fuel to use the fuel with reduced uranium enrichment reached the following conclusions: The assembly has a strong heterogeneity affecting the spatial kinetics; The interface (absorber) zone between the fast and thermal zone has clear impact on the assembly performance; the kinetic parameters (neutron generation time, effective fraction of delayed neutrons, etc.) are defined by the thermal zone; the experimental results obtained with application of PNS area method improves as the effective multiplication factor exceeds 0.8. The delayed neutron fraction value is used based on the MCNP simulation and it needs experimental verification;

The YALINA-Booster experiments performed during and after the conversion of fast zone HEU fuel to use the fuel with reduced uranium enrichment reached the following conclusions: The discrepancy between the experimental (PNS method) and calculated effective multiplication factor is less than 1 % without eliminating the spatial effects. After the replacement of the 90% enriched metallic uranium by 36% UO2 in the inner region of the fast zone, some additional amount of nuclear fuel was added into thermal zone to maintain keff at the proper level. The main YALINA-Booster neutronics was not affected remarkably, only the neutron spectrum softened slightly in the inner region of the fast zone.

The YALINA-Booster experiments performed during and after the conversion of fast zone HEU fuel to use the fuel with reduced uranium enrichment reached the following conclusions: As it was expected the second step of the conversion to LEU fuel (to 21% UO2 in fast zone) resulted in significant reduction of the effective multiplication factor. The value of keff estimated by MCNP was about 0.963, the experimental one 0.959. Despite the lack of additional fuel, there was a chance to maintain the assembly s performance consisted in changing the geometry of fast and absorber zone. The ANL proposed to realize the rounded configurations of these zones in the framework of the ISTC Project B1732P. The changes were introduced, the assembly was put into operation and the planned experiments were performed. The results are being processed just now. It should be noted that new configuration of fast zone has a great potential to keep the performance of the assembly s old configuration with HEU fuel.

New proposal is under discussion with ANL, USA Subcritical assembly fast neutron spectrum low enriched uranium fuel (< 20% X 5 ) Neutron generator as an external neutron source In cooperation and support ANL and IAEA

Thank you very much