A Report F.I.E.R.O. Total Heat Loss and Evaporative Resistance Measurements of Eight Firefighter Composites. Report #HP

Similar documents
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MOISTURE TRANSFER THROUGH FIREFIGHTERS' PROTECTIVE FABRICS IN RADIANT HEAT EXPOSURES

DEVELOPMENT OF THE MEASURING SYSTEM FOR ANALYSING THE THERMAL PROPERTIES OF CLOTHING

Investigation of the Thermal Insulation Properties of Multilayer Textiles

Full Ensemble and Bench Scale Testing of Fire Fighter Protective Clothing

Out life 30 days at 70 F (21 C) Shelf life 6 months at 40 F (4 C) 12 months at 0 F (-18 C)

Thermal behavior and Energetic Dispersals of the Human Body under Various Indoor Air Temperatures at 50% Relative Humidity

THE EVALUATION OF MOISTURE PERMEABILITY FOR WATERPROOF BREATHABLE OVERCOAT ON WEARING CONDITON

F ( C) Cure Epoxy Resin System. Out life 30 days at 70 F (21 C)

MATERIAL TEST REPORT STATIC DECAY AND SURFACE RESISTIVITY TESTING OF SOCK AND SPUNBOND SAMPLES NEW PIG CORPORATION FEBRUARY 28, 2008

Non-destructive determination of comfort parameters during marketing of functional garments and clothing

Prediction of thermo-physiological properties of plated knits by different neural network architectures

Background Commonly Used Fabric Tests Thermal Physical Test Methods Objective Limitations Conclusions 9/16/2016

CIGRE SC A2 & D1 JOINT COLLOQUIUM 2011, KYOTO JAPAN. Water Saturation Limits and Moisture Equilibrium Curves of Alternative Insulation Systems

GLOBAL HEAT AND MASS TRANSPORT IN SYSTEM: NEWBORN BABY SKIN TEXTILE COMPOSITE SURROUNDING

Comfort characteristics of textiles - Objective evaluation and prediction by soft computing techniques

New Developments In The Assessment of Protective Fabrics Using Computational Models

Test Method of Specified Requirements of FTTS-FA-010. Far Infrared Textiles

F ( C) Cure Epoxy Resin System. Out life 30 days at 70 F (21 C)

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

3900 PREPREG SYSTEM. Mechanically Stable Mechanical working life of product is over 40 days, allowing for lay-up of large parts.

M98-P2 (formerly C98-P1) Non-Newtonian Fluid Flow through Fabrics Matthew W. Dunn Philadelphia University

ESD: Another kind of lethal contaminant?

I.~~ \1xDZAIJON UIN GUARDE'D H01' 111 HF..AT TRAN"FER ANt) WATER. V.-A, lo R PERMEABILITY TESTING AT TORFLE LA \BORATORIES

Short Communications

Section 3.5 Thermal Comfort and Heat Stress

SolderSleeve Devices Specification For Commercial Wire Splices. Table of Contents

ANSI/AHRI Standard (Formerly ARI Standard ) 2006 Standard for Performance Rating of Desuperheater/Water Heaters

SONG, GUOWEN. Modeling Thermal Protection Outfits for Fire Exposures. (Under the

Influence of water on the total heat transfer in evacuated insulations

SPORTSCIENCE sportsci.org News & Comment: Exercise Physiology A Spreadsheet for Partitional Calorimetry

A PREDICTIVE MODEL OF THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS

3900 PREPREG SYSTEM. Mechanically Stable Mechanical working life of product is over 40 days, allowing for lay-up of large parts.

HD32.2 WBGT Index HD 32.2 INSTRUMENT FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE WBGT INDEX

A Numerical Analysis of Indoor Thermal Environment and Human Thermophysiological Responses under Natural Ventilation S. Iizuka 1,*, T. Sakoi 2, T. Sai

THE ADVANTAGE OF UNDER ARMOUR FOR WINTER SPORTS PERFORMANCE

ED 701 General Industry Pressure Transmitter

Solenoid valves Type EVUL

Fibre Friction WHAT IS FIBRE

TECHNICKÁ UNIVERZITA V LIBERCI

THERMAL AND SORPTION STUDY OF FLAME RESISTANT FIBERS

SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF APPARENT THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY AND DISTORTION OF COMPOSITES AT HIGH TEMPERATURE

A Heat Transfer Model for Fire Fighter s Protective Clothing

3960 PREPREG SYSTEM. Flexible Processing Prepreg can be suitably processed in either AFP or hand lay-up methodologies.

Hygrothermal Properties and Performance of Sea Grass Insulation

Calibration and Experimental Validation of LS-DYNA Composite Material Models by Multi Objective Optimization Techniques

Electrostatic Properties and Characterization of Textile Materials Affected by Ion Flux

Energy harvesting textiles for a rainy day: woven piezoelectrics. based on melt-spun PVDF microfibres with a conducting core

Biological Process Engineering An Analogical Approach to Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer, and Mass Transfer Applied to Biological Systems

Standard Test Method for Thermal Conductivity of Refractories 1

Modeling Exposures of a Nylon-Cotton Fabric to High Radiant Heat Flux

Field IT 50T Series Transmitters

1 /square Intermittent temperature range -250 C to 150 C (-420 F to 300 F) Continuous temperature range -250 C to 120 C (-420 F to 250 F)

IN-PLANE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF FLAT PLATES UTILIZING THE FOURIER HEAT CONDUCTION LAW

HexPly F655 Resin Systems for Advanced Composites

Making Decisions with Insulation

Comparison tests of cellular glass insulation for the development of cryogenic insulation standards

Name: Ahmad Alowais Class: ME476C Individual Analysis Team 20: Wonder Factory A Instructor: Dr. David Trevas

Enhanced Thermal Performance of Garments Embedded with Encapsulated Phase Change Material

Investigation of Performance Properties of Graphene Coated Fabrics

EFFECT OF RETROFITTING ON FLEXURAL RIGIDITY OF RECTANGULAR FRP PLATES

Ideal Gas Law. To demonstrate the dependence of pressure on temperature for a fixed volume of real gas.

Operating Instructions For the Series Weavexx Tensometer Instrument

Influence of Air Space on Multi-layered Material Water Vapor Permeability Measurement

Predicting Air Permeability of Nylon Parachute Fabrics

MEASUREMENT OF THE AIRFLOW AND TEMPERATURE FIELDS AROUND LIVE SUBJECTS AND THE EVALUATION OF HUMAN HEAT LOSS

Level 7 Post Graduate Diploma in Engineering Heat and mass transfer

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 24 Apr 2013

Peltier Application Note

Thermodynamics Introduction and Basic Concepts

Device for Measuring Sliding Friction on Highloft Nonwovens

Production excellence of Lewabrane elements. Cologne 2015

ea980r Digital Anemometer User Manual

Chemistry 212 MOLAR MASS OF A VOLATILE LIQUID USING THE IDEAL GAS LAW

PowerPoint Presentation by: Associated Technical Authors. Publisher The Goodheart-Willcox Company, Inc. Tinley Park, Illinois

Standard Test Methods for Glass-Bonded Mica Used as Electrical Insulation 1

Relative Humidity and Dew Point Lab

Experimental Results for Thermal Conductivity of Paraffin Waxes

Experimental Analysis of Wire Sandwiched Micro Heat Pipes

(Refer Slide Time: 01:09)

2510 PREPREG SYSTEM. Industry Database FAA approved design allowable values (AGATE methodology), results in a low cost one-batch equivalency.

Introduction: review of ISO 7933

Surface Mount UV LED. NUVA33 Series PART NUMBERING SYSTEM. WAVELENGTH CODES Code Nominal Wavelength

By Marek Tuliszka D.Sc. Department of Biophysics Poznań University of Medical Sciences

HD32.2 WBGT Index HD32.3 WBGT-PMV. [ GB ] - WBGT index. - PMV index and PPD

INFLUENCE KINDS OF MATERIALS ON THE POISSON S RATIO OF WOVEN FABRICS

5484BN/R7DC-AHJB/XR/MS(ELA)

Comparing 2-D Conduction Experiments with Simulation

Psychrometer construction for performance testing in. temperature and humidity chambers, and the precision

SEM-2017(03HI MECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Paper II. Please read each of the following instructions carefully before attempting questions.

ABSTRACT. LEE, DUCK WEON. Temperature and Humidity Control in Multi-layered Garments. (Under the direction of Dr. Trevor J. Little.

Test Results: Results of the test period on 06/19/16 using the Equivalent CTS Method: Thermal transmittance at test conditions (U s ):

SFI TECHNICAL BULLETIN 3.2 EFFECTIVE: FEBRUARY 26, 2014 *

Heat Transfer in Single-side Napped Fabrics During Compression

General Chemistry I CHEM-1030 Laboratory Experiment No. 2 Physical Separation Techniques

2510 PREPREG SYSTEM. Industry Database FAA approved design allowable values (AGATE methodology), results in a low cost one-batch equivalency.

TITLE STATUS SPEC. NO. DATE PAGE NO. 3.5Φ EARPHONE JACK 4 POLEs / 2 SWITCH GENERAL SMT TYPE BS S-01

Radiant heat transfer network in the simulated protective clothing system under high heat flux

DOCUMENTATION OF CALCULATION OF THERMAL INSULATION RESISTANCE IN THE SLOT OF ELECTRIC MACHINES

STATIC GAS MONITOR Type SGM/DEW Revision A of 20 aprile 2016

International Standard

Transcription:

A Report to F.I.E.R.O on Total Heat Loss and Evaporative Resistance Measurements of Eight Firefighter Composites Report #HP170626 from Textile Protection and Comfort Center (T-PACC) College of Textiles North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8301 June 2017

Total Heat Loss and Evaporative Resistance Measurements of Eight Firefighter Composites Eight composites samples were submitted, by F.I.E.R.O, to the Textile Protection and Comfort Center (TPACC) in the College of Textiles at North Carolina State University, for characterization of the heat and moisture transport properties that contribute to thermal strain. These eight samples represent composites used in the construction of test garments that were subjected to a physiological manikin study that is the subject of Report #PSM170626 Phase II Testing: Predicted Physiological Responses from Eight Firefighting Suits Tested in Three Environmental Conditions, which was also sponsored by F.I.E.R.O. The purpose of this report is to describe the test method used to characterize these materials and to present the results of the laboratory test. Test Material Rolls of fabrics were sent by the customer. These fabrics were cut and assembled into eight sets of composites (three reps each) based on information provided by the customer. Each composite was identified by one of the following labels G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6, G7, or G8. A generic listing of the layers within each composite is detailed in Appendix A. It should be noted that G1, G2, G3, G4, G5 and G6 are made of materials that are compliant with NFPA 1971. Samples G7 and G8 would not be compliant as they contain an impermeable membrane (G7) or no membrane at all (G8). Test Method The heat and moisture transfer properties determined in this testing were calculated from measurements of thermal transport made with the Thermetrics sweating guarded hot plate. Samples were tested in accordance with the procedures of ISO 11092 Measurement of thermal and water vapour resistance under steady-state conditions (sweating guarded-hotplate test) and the ASTM F 1868, Standard Test Method for Thermal and Evaporative Resistance of Clothing Materials Using a Sweating Hot Plate, Part C. ISO 11092 was used to measure the evaporative resistance and ASTM F1868 Part C was used to measure the total heat loss. A description of the measured heat transfer parameters is given below; other details pertaining to instrumentation, methods and calculations are given in Appendix B. Dry and Sweating Hot Plate Tests The measurement of heat transfer is a measure of heat flow from the calibrated test plate (heated to a surface temperature of 35 C) through the composite into the test environment. For evaporative resistance measurements the test environment is set to 35 C, 40%RH. This condition removes the ability for heat to flow through conduction and focuses on how the fabric allows moisture to evaporate from the surface of the test plate. For the total heat loss measurement the environmental conditions are set to 25 C, 65%RH, and measurements are taken with both dry and wet plate conditions. Measurements from these

conditions are used to measure the thermal resistance, apparent evaporative resistance and the total heat loss from a fabric. Measurements reported for these experiments are defined below a. Apparatus Evaporative Resistance (R et0 ), [( Pa)(m 2 )/W], the resistance to evaporative heat transfer provided by the liquid barrier and surface air layer as measured on the bare plate (with liquid barrier attached). b. Evaporative Resistance of the Textile (R et ), [( Pa)(m 2 )/W], the resistance to evaporative heat transfer provided by the textile system alone. d. Total Thermal Resistance (R ct ), [( C)(m 2 )/W], the total resistance to dry heat transfer (insulation) for a fabric system including the surface air layer. e. Intrinsic Thermal Resistance (R cf ), [( C)(m 2 )/W], the resistance to dry heat transfer provided by the fabric system alone. f. Bare Plate Thermal Resistance (R cbp ), [( C)(m 2 )/W], the resistance to dry heat provided by the surface air layer as measured on the bare plate. g. Apparent Total Evaporative Resistance (R et A ), [( kpa)(m 2 )/W], the total resistance to evaporative heat transfer for a fabric system including the surface air layer and liquid barrier (the descriptor term apparent is added to account for the fact that heat transfer may have an added condensation component in nonisothermal conditions). h. Apparent Intrinsic Evaporative Resistance (R ef A ), [( kpa)(m 2 )/W], the resistance to evaporative heat transfer provided by the fabric system alone. i. Bare Plate Evaporative Resistance (R ebp ), [( kpa)(m 2 )/W], the resistance to evaporative heat transfer provided by the liquid barrier and surface air layer as measured on the bare plate (with liquid barrier attached). j. Total Heat Loss (Q t ), [W/m 2 ], an indicator of the heat transferred through the test material by the combined dry and evaporative heat loss, from a fully sweating test plate surface into the test environment. Total heat loss, measured at a 100% wet skin condition, indicates the highest predicted metabolic activity level that a wearer may sustain and still maintain body thermal comfort while in a highly stressed state in the test environment. Note, however, that the sweating hot plate does not consider effects such as insulating air layers, garment design, and fit. Thus, the Total Heat Loss value obtained represents the highest theoretically possible amount of heat that can be transferred through a material system in a 25 C, 65%RH condition without active cooling or ventilation.

Weight and Thickness Weight is measured according to ASTM D 3776 small swatch option. Three specimens (20 x 20 inch) were weighed on an analytical balance and the weight was calculated in mass per unit area (oz/yd 2 ). Thickness is measured according to ASTM D 1777 test option 1. Three specimens (20 x 20 inch) were measured with a thickness gauge (mm) at an applied pressure of 0.6 psi at various locations of the fabric.

Test Results The average values for the Evaporative Resistance of the textile (Ret), and The Total Heat Loss (Qt) of the sample tested are contained in Table 1. Weights and thicknesses are given in Table 2. Individual results and detailed data of each test sample are displayed in Appendix C. Table 1: Sample Results from Sweating Hot Plate Sample Ret Qt G1 31.4 273.0 G2 26.9 254.6 G3 23.4 307.8 G4 21.8 256.8 G5 27.8 241.5 G6 27.6 246.5 G7 396* 101.9 G8 13.7 272.8 *The values reported for G7 were obtained while testing at an ambient temperature of 33 C which was deemed impermeable due to near zero power being required in order to maintain the plate temperature of 35 C at an ambient temperature of 35 C. This temperature reduction was necessary in order to obtain an actual value. Table 2: Average Weights and Thicknesses Sample Weight (oz/yd 2 ) Thickness (mm) G1 19.89 2.59 G2 20.07 3.20 G3 20.35 2.23 G4 21.45 2.28 G5 19.68 2.15 G6 20.22 2.12 G7 25.70 2.92 G8 18.30 2.68

Caveat These data, obtained under controlled laboratory conditions, characterize the thermal resistance values of test sample responses to specific environmental conditions. These results should not be used to appraise the safety benefits or risks of the materials, products, or assemblies in extreme use conditions. The relationships between laboratory tests and field performance are not simple, and many things must be considered when making practical translations. Clothing comfort and heat stress performance are determined by many factors including material properties, garment design and fit, activity level, and the environmental conditions of use. These results do not address the full range of these issues. It is not our intention to recommend, exclude, or predict the suitability of any commercial product for a particular end use.

Appendix A: Composite Layer Information G1 Outer shell 7.5 oz/yd 2 plain weave ( 93% Nomex /5% Kevlar /2% anti-static blend spun yarn) Moisture Barrier 4.6 oz/yd 2 (bicomponent eptfe laminated to a Nomex spunlace) Thermal liner 7.1 oz/yd 2 (2 layers of Basofil - /Aramid blend spunlaced quilted to Nomex spun yarn, calendared plain weave fabric) Outer shell Moisture Barrier Thermal liner G2 7.5 oz/yd 2 plain weave ( 93% Nomex /5% Kevlar /2% anti-static blend spun yarn) 5.2 oz/yd 2 (bicomponent eptfe laminated to Nomex spunlace) 7.2 oz/yd 2 (single layer of aramid fiber needle punched fabric quilted to 100% Nomex spun fiber, plain weave fabric) G3 Outer shell 7.5 oz/yd 2 plain weave ( 93% Nomex /5% Kevlar /2% anti-static blend spun yarn) Moisture Barrier 5.2 oz/yd 2 (bicomponent eptfe laminated to 80% Nomex IIIA / 20% PBI woven pajama-check) Thermal liner 7.2 oz/yd 2 (two layers of Nomex spunlaced fabrics [1.5 and 2.3 oz/yd 2 ] quilted to 100% Nomex spun fiber, plain weave fabric) Outer shell Moisture barrier & Thermal liner system Outer shell Moisture Barrier Thermal liner G4 7.0 oz/yd 2 twill weave (70% PBI/Kevlar spun yarns and 30% Kevlar filament yarns) 98% NOMEX /2% anti-static spun yarn woven fabric, plain weave, laminated to an eptfe film Kevlar /Nomex blend patterned nonwoven spunlace with scrim, laminated to an eptfe film 60% Kevlar filament yarn / 40% Nomex / Lenzing FR blend spun yarn, twill weave, coupled with an eptfe film G5 7.0 oz/yd 2 twill weave (70% PBI/Kevlar spun yarns and 30% Kevlar filament yarns) 4.7 oz/yd 2 (bicomponent eptfe laminated to 100% Nomex woven pajamacheck) 6.8 oz/yd 2 (two layers of 80% Aramid 20% PBI apertured spunlaced fabrics [1.4 and 1.8 oz/yd 2 ] quilted to 60% Kevlar, 26% Nomex, 14% Lenzing FR, twill weave fabric)

Outer shell Moisture Barrier Thermal liner Outer shell Moisture Barrier Thermal liner Outer shell Moisture Barrier Thermal liner G6 7.0 oz/yd 2 twill weave (70% PBI/Kevlar spun yarns and 30% Kevlar filament yarns) 5.2 oz/yd 2 (bicomponent eptfe laminated to 80% Nomex IIIA / 20% PBI woven pajama-check) 6.8 oz/yd 2 (two layers of 80% Aramid 20% PBI apertured spunlaced fabrics [1.4 and 1.8 oz/yd 2 ] quilted to 60% Kevlar, 26% Nomex, 14% Lenzing FR, twill weave fabric) G7 7.75 oz/yd 2 Twill with rip stop (Blend of Kevlar and Basofil fibers) 9 oz/yd 2 (Neoprene laminated to a poly cotton cloth) 9.25 oz/yd 2 (single layer of recycled Nomex quilt, quilted to Nomex spun fiber, plain weave fabric) G8 5.3 oz/yd 2 ripstop ( Blend of Technora and PBO spun yarns) 4.5oz/yd 2 100% Nomex pajama-check 7.6oz/yd 2( single layer of 50% Nomex 50% Kevlar needle-punched quilted to a 68% Kevlar, 26% FR Viscose, 11% Polyamide ring spun fabric)

Appendix B: Instrument, Methods, and the Calculation of Total Heat Loss Parameters Heat Transfer With/Without Moisture (Sweating Skin Condition) Heat transfer makes it possible to predict the body heat that will flow from the skin surface through the material into the surrounding atmosphere. Heat and moisture transfer properties are key properties affecting clothing comfort. These thermal properties are analyzed using a guarded sweating hotplate system from Measurement Technology Northwest Inc. housed in an environmental test chamber set to achieve the required ambient conditions. Tests were run in accordance with requirements of ISO 11092 Measurement of thermal and water vapour resistance under steady-state conditions (sweating guarded-hotplate test) and ASTM F 1868 Standard Test Method for Thermal and Evaporative Resistance of clothing Materials Using a Sweating Hot Plate; Part C. The specifics and allowable refinements are as follows: For a given replicate the temperatures, humidity, voltage and current are logged at 2 minute intervals with an acceptable steady-state deviation of no more than 1.5% for at least 30 minutes. Wind speed is set to 1 m/s with a turbulence value of ~0.07. Using system constants, Ret, Rcf, Ref A, and Qt are calculated for each replicate. The replicate values are averaged to provide overall sample averages as reported in this document. Calculation of Evaporative Resistance Ret = evaporative resistance of the textile specimen where: Ret = {(P s - P a ) A/(H - Hc)} Ret0 P s = water vapor pressure at the plate surface (Pa), P a = water vapor pressure in the local environment (Pa), A = area of the test plate (0.01 m 2 ), H = power input (W), Hc = Power correction factor (Set to 0 for modern plates. Correction is need for older plates with poor guard sections) Ret0 = resistance to evaporative heat transfer provided by the liquid barrier and surface air layer of the plate Calculation of Total Heat Loss Parameters Calculation of the Total Heat Loss, Qt [W/m 2 ], requires measurements from both dry and sweating conditions on a hotplate. Each total heat loss calculation was derived from the average of three test replications. Total heat loss, Qt, was calculated using the following formula:

Qt = 10 C + 3.57 kpa Rcf +.04 Ret A +.0035 where: Q t = Total Heat Loss (THL), Rcf = the average intrinsic thermal resistance of the sample alone and is determined by subtracting the average dry bare plate resistance (Rcbp) from the average of the total thermal resistance (Rct) of the specimens tested, Ref A = Average apparent intrinsic evaporative resistance of the sample alone as determined by the apparent total evaporative resistance (Ret A ) minus the average bare plate evaporative resistance (Rebp), Rct = total thermal resistance of the specimen and surface air layer defined as where: Rct = (Ts - Ta) A H T s = Temperature of the plate surface (35 C), T a = Temperature in the local environment (25 C), A = area of the test plate (0.01 m 2 ), and H = power input (W), Ret A = apparent total evaporative resistance of the specimen and surface air layer defined as where: Ret A = (Ps - Pa) A/H - (Ts - Ta) A Rct P s = water vapor pressure at the surface plate (kpa), P a = water vapor pressure in the local environment (kpa), A = area of the test plate (0.01 m 2 ), H = power input (W), T s = temperature at the plate surface (35 C), T a = temperature at the local environment (25 C), and Rct = total thermal resistance of the specimen and surface air layer [(Δ C)(m 2 )/W].

Appendix C: NCSU Sweating Thermal Hot Plate Results Sample G1 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 33.07 0.2005 0.01855 0.125 0.01287 278.87 2 31.10 0.1957 0.01877 0.120 0.01308 277.89 3 30.05 0.1906 0.02024 0.115 0.01456 262.36 AVG 31.41 0.196 0.01919 0.120 0.01350 273.04 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 19.95 2 19.91 3 19.79 Average 19.89 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 2.54 2 2.60 3 2.62 4 2.60 5 2.56 6 2.58 7 2.60 8 2.62 9 2.60 Average 2.59

Sample G2 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 26.60 0.2118 0.02155 0.136 0.01587 241.23 2 27.05 0.2095 0.01954 0.134 0.01386 263.29 3 26.92 0.203 0.02008 0.127 0.01440 259.37 AVG 26.86 0.208 0.02039 0.132 0.01471 254.63 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 20.14 2 20.01 3 20.06 Average 20.07 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 3.26 2 3.20 3 3.24 4 3.28 5 3.24 6 3.18 7 3.22 8 3.04 9 3.12 Average 3.20

Sample G3 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 22.89 0.1562 0.01788 0.080 0.01220 310.66 2 23.57 0.1587 0.01793 0.083 0.01225 308.17 3 23.60 0.1586 0.01819 0.083 0.01250 304.65 AVG 23.35 0.158 0.01800 0.082 0.01232 307.82 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 20.34 2 20.31 3 20.40 Average 20.35 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 2.24 2 2.26 3 2.24 4 2.18 5 2.24 6 2.22 7 2.28 8 2.20 9 2.18 Average 2.23

Sample G4 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 22.59 0.1511 0.02275 0.075 0.01707 260.43 2 20.16 0.1595 0.02281 0.084 0.01712 254.09 3 22.71 0.1525 0.02317 0.077 0.01748 255.97 AVG 21.82 0.154 0.02291 0.078 0.01723 256.83 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 21.38 2 21.52 3 21.45 Average 21.45 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 2.28 2 2.32 3 2.30 4 2.22 5 2.22 6 2.24 7 2.28 8 2.30 9 2.32 Average 2.28

Sample G5 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 28.38 0.1807 0.02292 0.105 0.01724 241.28 2 27.25 0.1752 0.02300 0.099 0.01732 243.32 3 27.64 0.1751 0.02343 0.099 0.01775 239.90 AVG 27.76 0.177 0.02312 0.101 0.01743 241.50 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 19.79 2 19.54 3 19.70 Average 19.68 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 2.12 2 2.14 3 2.16 4 2.18 5 2.16 6 2.10 7 2.18 8 2.16 9 2.18 Average 2.15

Sample G6 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 26.74 0.1849 0.02348 0.109 0.01779 234.83 2 28.27 0.1714 0.02210 0.095 0.01642 253.11 3 27.71 0.1731 0.02217 0.097 0.01649 251.56 AVG 27.57 0.176 0.02258 0.100 0.01690 246.50 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 20.24 2 20.14 3 20.28 Average 20.22 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 2.04 2 2.12 3 2.16 4 2.08 5 2.10 6 2.12 7 2.16 8 2.16 9 2.14 Average 2.12

Sample G7 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 394.68 0.2079 0.07759 0.132 0.07190 105.52 2 396.70 0.2207 0.08254 0.145 0.07685 98.57 3 396.56 0.2179 0.07848 0.142 0.07279 101.77 AVG 395.98 0.216 0.07953 0.140 0.07385 101.95 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 25.63 2 25.71 3 25.75 Average 25.70 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 2.94 2 2.90 3 2.84 4 2.98 5 3.00 6 2.92 7 2.82 8 2.98 9 2.92 Average 2.92

Sample G8 Rep Ret Rct Ret A Rcf Ref A Qt 1 13.99 0.1856 0.01929 0.110 0.01360 275.58 2 14.04 0.1904 0.02053 0.114 0.01484 259.40 3 13.15 0.1778 0.01895 0.102 0.01327 283.44 AVG 13.72 0.185 0.01959 0.109 0.01390 272.81 Weight Rep Weight (oz/yd 2 ) 1 18.66 2 18.09 3 18.16 Average 18.30 Thickness Rep Thickness (mm) 1 2.76 2 2.58 3 2.56 4 2.76 5 2.80 6 2.60 7 2.76 8 2.78 9 2.56 Average 2.68