On embedding all n-manifolds into a single (n + 1)-manifold

Similar documents
30 Surfaces and nondegenerate symmetric bilinear forms

Algebraic Topology exam

Cup product and intersection

Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12

MONDAY - TALK 4 ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE ON COHOMOLOGY

4-MANIFOLDS: CLASSIFICATION AND EXAMPLES. 1. Outline

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick

Math 6510 Homework 10

ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP. Contents 1. Introduction 1

ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY IV. Definition 1.1. Let A, B be abelian groups. The set of homomorphisms ϕ: A B is denoted by

APPENDIX 1: REVIEW OF SINGULAR COHOMOLOGY

DEFINITE MANIFOLDS BOUNDED BY RATIONAL HOMOLOGY THREE SPHERES

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality

The Classification of (n 1)-connected 2n-manifolds

Introduction to surgery theory

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday 10 February 2004 (Day 1)

Algebraic Topology Final

Algebraic geometry versus Kähler geometry

Lecture 11: Hirzebruch s signature theorem

1 Moduli spaces of polarized Hodge structures.

Special cubic fourfolds

An Outline of Homology Theory

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997

Spheres John Milnor Institute for Mathematical Sciences Stony Brook University (

Classification of (n 1)-connected 2n-dimensional manifolds and the discovery of exotic spheres

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 28 Sep 2016

32 Proof of the orientation theorem

Exercises on characteristic classes

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

SETS OF DEGREES OF MAPS BETWEEN SU(2)-BUNDLES OVER THE 5-SPHERE

Characteristic Classes, Chern Classes and Applications to Intersection Theory

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

COBORDISM OF DISK KNOTS

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

ALGEBRAIC MODELS, DUALITY, AND RESONANCE. Alex Suciu. Topology Seminar. MIT March 5, Northeastern University

Cohomological rigidity of 6-dimensional quasitoric manifolds

SOME EXERCISES IN CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Part II. Algebraic Topology. Year

NON FORMAL COMPACT MANIFOLDS WITH SMALL BETTI NUMBERS

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

1 Structures 2. 2 Framework of Riemann surfaces Basic configuration Holomorphic functions... 3

LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

GEOMETRY FINAL CLAY SHONKWILER

On the homotopy invariance of string topology

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 13 Mar 2019

CLASSIFICATION OF TORIC MANIFOLDS OVER AN n-cube WITH ONE VERTEX CUT

The Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4)

Holomorphic line bundles

Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-lipschitz invariant

An introduction to cobordism

CLOSED (J-I)-CONNECTED (2J+1)-MANIFOLDS, s = 3, 7.

Exotic spheres. Overview and lecture-by-lecture summary. Martin Palmer / 22 July 2017

H. Schubert, Kalkül der abzählenden Geometrie, 1879.

Cohomology jump loci of local systems

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

7.3 Singular Homology Groups

An introduction to calculus of functors

Oxford 13 March Surgery on manifolds: the early days, Or: What excited me in the 1960s. C.T.C.Wall

LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS

Bordism and the Pontryagin-Thom Theorem

EMBEDDINGS OF TOPOLOGICAL MANIFOLDS

An Introduction to Spectral Sequences

EACAT7 at IISER, Mohali Homology of 4D universe for every 3-manifold

K3 Surfaces and Lattice Theory

L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

THE p-smooth LOCUS OF SCHUBERT VARIETIES. Let k be a ring and X be an n-dimensional variety over C equipped with the classical topology.

NONCOMMUTATIVE LOCALIZATION IN ALGEBRA AND TOPOLOGY Andrew Ranicki (Edinburgh) aar. Heidelberg, 17th December, 2008

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Lecture on Equivariant Cohomology

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

Pin (2)-monopole theory I

INERTIA GROUPS AND SMOOTH STRUCTURES OF (n - 1)- CONNECTED 2n-MANIFOLDS. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 53(2) P.309-P.319

Math 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen

DIMENSION 4: GETTING SOMETHING FROM NOTHING

MAXIMAL NILPOTENT QUOTIENTS OF 3-MANIFOLD GROUPS. Peter Teichner

Free Loop Cohomology of Complete Flag Manifolds

Hodge Theory of Maps

Lecture 8: More characteristic classes and the Thom isomorphism

Nonabelian Poincare Duality (Lecture 8)

Smooth Complete Intersections with Positive-Definite Intersection Form

ON r-neighbourly SUBMANIFOLDS IN R N. Victor A. Vassiliev. 1. Introduction. Let M be a k-dimensional manifold, and r a natural number.

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Multiplicative properties of Atiyah duality

Exercises for Algebraic Topology

Cohomology jump loci of quasi-projective varieties

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Cobordant differentiable manifolds

The tangent space to an enumerative problem

Lecture 2. Smooth functions and maps

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY APPENDIX A: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY

PERVERSE SHEAVES ON A TRIANGULATED SPACE

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 2 Oct 2002

Transcription:

On embedding all n-manifolds into a single (n + 1)-manifold Jiangang Yao, UC Berkeley The Forth East Asian School of Knots and Related Topics Joint work with Fan Ding & Shicheng Wang 2008-01-23

Problem high-dim 4-dim

Introduction Problem high-dim 4-dim Question Find the smallest nonnegative integer e n, such that any n-dimensional connected, closed manifold can be embedded into a single connected, closed manifold of dimension n + e n. Note All embeddings are considered to be topologically flat. 0 e n n, by Whitney embedding theorem, e 0 = e 1 = 0, e 2 = 1, e 3 = 2.

Why e 2 = 1? Problem high-dim 4-dim Classification of connected, closed 2-manifolds Lemma If M n 1 Orientable surface: #nt 2, non-orientable surface: #nt 2 #RP 2 or #nt 2 #RP 2 #RP 2. Wn+1 1 and M2 n Wn+1 2, then M 1 #M 2 W 1 #W 2. As #nt 2 S 3, RP 2 RP 3, every surface embeds in S 3 #RP 3 #RP 3 RP 3 #RP 3.

Why e 3 = 2? Problem high-dim 4-dim Every oriented, closed 3-manifolds embeds into S 5. [Hirsch, 1961] Every non-orientable, closed 3-manifolds embeds into S 5. [Rohlin, 1965; Wall, 1965] There does not exist a single oriented, closed 4-manifold such that any connected, closed 3-manifold can be embedded into it. [Kawauchi, 1988] The condition oriented can be eliminated from the above statement. [Shiomi, 1991]

Does e n > 1? Problem high-dim 4-dim Question Let n be a positive integer, whether there exists a connected, closed (n + 1)-manifold W, such that any connected, closed n-manifold M can be embedded into W. Up To Date Results YES for n = 1, 2, NO for n = 3 and n = 4m 1, [Kawauchi]. Partially YES for n = 4, No for n is a composite number and is not a power of 2. We expect the answer to be NO for any n 4.

Negative result Theorem If n is a composite number and is not a power of 2, then there does not exist a connected, closed (n + 1)-manifold W, such that any smooth, simply-connected, closed n-manifold M can be embedded into W. If such a W exists and is non-orientable, then its orientation double cover W will also satisfies the condition, but W is oriented. Note All manifolds are considered to be oriented, connected and closed.

Homological obstruction (in a simple case) Suppose M n W n+1, then W\M could be connected have two components W 1 and W 2. In the latter case, by using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence for (W 1, W 2 ), we get Proposition For any integer factorization n = pq, where p, q > 0, there exists a subspace V H p (M; R) such that (ii) dim V 1 2 (β p(m) β p+1 (W)), and (iii) for any x 1,..., x q V, x 1... x q = 0.

Homological obstruction (full version) Proposition Suppose M n W n+1, then for any integer factorization n = pq, where p, q > 0, there exists a subspace V of H p (M; R) and a linear transformation ϕ : V H p (M; R) such that (i) ϕ has no fixed non-zero vectors, (ii) dim V 1 2 (β p(m) β p+1 (W)), and (iii) for any x 1,..., x q V, x 1... x q = ϕ(x 1 )... ϕ(x q ). There are 3 items in this statement. a subspace a linear transformation a cup product relation

Sketch of the proof for the theorem Let n = pq, where p 2, q 3 and is odd. Given W n+1, then β p+1 (W) is fixed. We will find M n whose cohomology ring does not satisfy the obstruction, thus M n W n+1. The construction of M has three steps. A good(bad?) multilinear function F on V, (with V = H p (M), F = in mind), A commutative graded algebra A = i=0 A i, (with A = H (M) in mind), A smooth manifold M.

Step 1: Special multilinear function Recall that the cup product induces a symmetric/skew-symmetric multilinear function on H p (M). Note ( q R m ) denotes the space of all the q-th skew-symmetric multilinear functions on R m. ( q R m ) denotes the space of all the q-th symmetric multilinear functions on R m. Definition Let F be an element of ( q R m ) (resp. ( q R m ) ). We say that F is special if there exist a subspace U of R m with dim U m 3 and a linear map ϕ : U R m with no fixed non-zero vectors such that for all x 1,..., x q U, F(x 1,..., x q ) = F(ϕ(x 1 ),..., ϕ(x q )). m 3 is related to 1 2 (β p(m) β p+1 (W)).

Step 1: Special multilinear function (Cont.) Definition F is called special if there exist a subspace U of R m with dim U m 3 and a linear map ϕ : U R m with no fixed non-zero vectors such that for all x 1,..., x q U, F(x 1,..., x q ) = F(ϕ(x 1 ),..., ϕ(x q )). Proposition Suppose q 3 is an odd integer. If m is sufficiently large, then there exists a proper closed subset X m of ( q R m ) (resp. ( q R m ) ) such that all the special functions are in X m. The condition q is odd is crucial. If q is even, then each F is special. We may simply take U = R m and ϕ : R m R m to be the map sending x to x for all x R m. The conditions q 3 is necessary in the estimation.

Step 2: From multilinear function to cohomology ring By using symmetric/skew-symmetric tensor product and dual space, we can prove Proposition Suppose that p is a positive integer, q 3 is an odd integer. Let F ( q V) if p is odd and F ( q V) if p even, where V is a finite dimensional vector space over Q. There exists a commutative graded algebra A = pq i=0 A i satisfying Poincaré duality such that (i) A p = V, A pq = Q, and A i 0 only if i is a multiple of p, (ii) for all v 1,..., v q A p = V, F(v 1,..., v q ) = v 1... v q. Note Commutativity means for all a A r, b A s, a b = ( 1) rs (b a). Poincaré duality means A n = Q and ϕ i : A i Hom(A n i, A n ) given by ϕ i (u)(v) = u v, u A i, v A n i is an isomorphism for all i.

Step 3: From cohomology ring to manifold Theorem (Sullivan 1977) For any commutative graded algebra A = n i=0 A i over Q, If A satisfies Poincaré duality, A 1 = 0 and A n 2 = 0, then there exists a simply-connected, closed, smooth n-manifold M such that H (M; Q) is isomorphic to A. Recall that n = pq, where p 2, q 3 and is odd. For m 3β p+1 (W), we can find a rational non-special multilinear function F. F can be extended to a C.G.A. A = q i=0 A pi over Q. p 2 = A 1 = 0, q is odd = A n 2 = 0. So we can finally get the desired manifold M.

Positive result in dimension 4 Note All manifolds are considered to be topological. Theorem (a) All simply-connected, indefinite, closed 4-manifolds can be embedded into an oriented closed 5-manifold. Theorem (b) All simply-connected, compact 4-manifolds with non-empty boundary can be embedded into S 2 S 3, the non-trivial S 3 -bundle over S 2.

Intersection forms on 4-manifolds For any compact, connected, oriented 4-manifold M, the cup product : H 2 (M, M) H 2 (M, M) H 4 (M, M) gives a symmetric bilinear form Q M : H 2 (M) H 2 (M) Z through duality theorem. Clearly, Q M (a, b) = 0 if a or b is a torsion element. So Q M descends to an integral symmetric bilinear form on H 2 (M)/Torsion Z r. By choosing a basis of Z r, Q M can be represented by a symmetric matrix Q. Poincaré theorem implies det Q = ±1 when M is closed and we say Q M is called unimodular.

Integral symmetric bilinear form Given an integral symmetric bilinear form Q on Z r. r is called the rank of Q, denoted by rk(q). Extend and diagonalize Q over Q r, the number of positive entries and the number of negative entries are denoted by b + 2 and b 2 respectively, the difference b+ 2 b 2 is called the signature of Q, denoted by σ(q). Q is called indefinite if both b + 2 and b 2 are positive, and definite otherwise. Q is called even if Q(a, a) is even for any a, and odd otherwise.

Classification results Given an integral unimodular symmetric bilinear form Q, If Q is odd, then If Q is even, then Q b + 2 [+1] b 2 [ 1]. Q c 1 E 8 c 2 H, where c 1, c 2 Z, c 2 0, E 8 is an even form with rk(e 8 ) = σ(e 8 ) = 8, and H = Theorem (Freedman) [ ] 0 1. 1 0 Up to homeomorphism, there exists exactly one (Q is even) or two (Q is odd) simply-connected, closed, topological 4-manifold M such that its intersection form is Q.

Standard form of indefinite 4-manifolds Based on the following facts, we have Every indefinite form is build from [+1], [ 1], E 8, E 8 and H by. Q M Q M is the intersection form of M#M. Proposition There exist oriented closed connected 4-manifolds M i, 1 i 7, such that any simply-connected indefinite closed 4-manifold M is homeomorphic to #k 1 M 1 #k 2 M 2... #k 7 M 7 for some non-negative integers k i. M 1 = CP 2,..., M 3 = CP 2,..., M 7 = S 2 S 2.

Sketch of the proof of theorem (a) With direct construction, we have Lemma For any oriented closed connected 4-manifold M, there exists an oriented closed connected 5-manifold W such that for any positive integer r, #rm can be embedded into W. For the each M i in the above proposition, find corresponding W i by this lemma, then choose W = W 1 #W 2 #... #W 7.

Proof of the lemma See figures.

Key points in the proof of theorem (b) Remark The double of M, DM = M#( M), is a simply-connected, indefinite, closed 4-manifold with σ = 0. DM is homeomorphic to either #kcp 2 #kcp 2 or #ks 2 S 2 DM is homeomorphic to either #ks 2 S 2 or #(k 1)S 2 S 2 #S 2 S 2. #ks 2 S 2 S 5, S 2 S 2 S 2 S 3. Definite integral bilinear forms are far more complicated than indefinite ones. Signature is not an obstruction for this embedding problem.