USMC Enlisted Endstrength Model

Similar documents
Report Documentation Page

Use of Wijsman's Theorem for the Ratio of Maximal Invariant Densities in Signal Detection Applications

Diagonal Representation of Certain Matrices

REGENERATION OF SPENT ADSORBENTS USING ADVANCED OXIDATION (PREPRINT)

Quantitation and Ratio Determination of Uranium Isotopes in Water and Soil Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

CRS Report for Congress

System Reliability Simulation and Optimization by Component Reliability Allocation

P. Kestener and A. Arneodo. Laboratoire de Physique Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon 46, allée d Italie Lyon cedex 07, FRANCE

Analysis Comparison between CFD and FEA of an Idealized Concept V- Hull Floor Configuration in Two Dimensions. Dr. Bijan Khatib-Shahidi & Rob E.

Attribution Concepts for Sub-meter Resolution Ground Physics Models

Crowd Behavior Modeling in COMBAT XXI

Closed-form and Numerical Reverberation and Propagation: Inclusion of Convergence Effects

Thermo-Kinetic Model of Burning for Polymeric Materials

RANGE SUSTAINABILITY GIS APPLICATIONS AND ENTERPRISE IMPLEMENTATIONS

Report Documentation Page

Report Documentation Page

Broadband matched-field source localization in the East China Sea*

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Predictive Model for Archaeological Resources. Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia John Haynes Jesse Bellavance

A report (dated September 20, 2011) on. scientific research carried out under Grant: FA

PIPS 3.0. Pamela G. Posey NRL Code 7322 Stennis Space Center, MS Phone: Fax:

Real-Time Environmental Information Network and Analysis System (REINAS)

Mixture Distributions for Modeling Lead Time Demand in Coordinated Supply Chains. Barry Cobb. Alan Johnson

Estimation of Vertical Distributions of Water Vapor and Aerosols from Spaceborne Observations of Scattered Sunlight

Development and Application of Acoustic Metamaterials with Locally Resonant Microstructures

Ocean Acoustics Turbulence Study

SW06 Shallow Water Acoustics Experiment Data Analysis

DIRECTIONAL WAVE SPECTRA USING NORMAL SPREADING FUNCTION

Optimizing Robotic Team Performance with Probabilistic Model Checking

Volume 6 Water Surface Profiles

High Resolution Surface Characterization from Marine Radar Measurements

Scattering of Internal Gravity Waves at Finite Topography

Predicting Tropical Cyclone Formation and Structure Change

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER

Determining the Stratification of Exchange Flows in Sea Straits

uniform distribution theory

Metrology Experiment for Engineering Students: Platinum Resistance Temperature Detector

Understanding Near-Surface and In-cloud Turbulent Fluxes in the Coastal Stratocumulus-topped Boundary Layers

Coastal Engineering Technical Note

Sensitivity of West Florida Shelf Simulations to Initial and Boundary Conditions Provided by HYCOM Data-Assimilative Ocean Hindcasts

INFRARED SPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS OF SHUTTLE ENGINE FIRINGS

THE EULER FUNCTION OF FIBONACCI AND LUCAS NUMBERS AND FACTORIALS

Mine Burial Studies with a Large Oscillating Water-Sediment Tunnel (LOWST)

FRACTAL CONCEPTS AND THE ANALYSIS OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES

HYCOM Caspian Sea Modeling. Part I: An Overview of the Model and Coastal Upwelling. Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, USA

Models of Marginal Seas Partially Enclosed by Islands

Design for Lifecycle Cost using Time-Dependent Reliability

On Applying Point-Interval Logic to Criminal Forensics

Wavelets and Affine Distributions A Time-Frequency Perspective

High-Fidelity Computational Simulation of Nonlinear Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems

Grant Number: N IP To compare obtained theoretical results with NPAL experimental data.

NAVGEM Platform Support

Marginal Sea - Open Ocean Exchange

Extension of the BLT Equation to Incorporate Electromagnetic Field Propagation

Parameterizing the Effects of Upper-Ocean Large Eddies on Air-Sea Interaction

Super-Parameterization of Boundary Layer Roll Vortices in Tropical Cyclone Models

Modeling the Impact of Extreme Events on Margin Sedimentation

USER S GUIDE. ESTCP Project ER

Computer Simulation of Sand Ripple Growth and Migration.

VLBA IMAGING OF SOURCES AT 24 AND 43 GHZ

Regional Stratification and Shear of the Various Streams Feeding the Philippine Straits ESR Component

Flocculation, Optics and Turbulence in the Community Sediment Transport Model System: Application of OASIS Results

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE. Theoretical Study on Nano-Catalyst Burn Rate. Yoshiyuki Kawazoe (Tohoku Univ) N/A AOARD UNIT APO AP

Molecular Characterization and Proposed Taxonomic Placement of the Biosimulant 'BG'

SMA Bending. Cellular Shape Memory Structures: Experiments & Modeling N. Triantafyllidis (UM), J. Shaw (UM), D. Grummon (MSU)

Award # N LONG TERM GOALS

Report Documentation Page

Curating and Maintenance of the Sediment Library and Dredge Collection

The Extratropical Transition of Tropical Cyclones

Assimilation of Synthetic-Aperture Radar Data into Navy Wave Prediction Models

Catalytic Oxidation of CW Agents Using H O in 2 2 Ionic Liquids

Internal Waves and Mixing in the Aegean Sea

Comparative Analysis of Flood Routing Methods

Improvement of Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction For Coastal Regions of Complex Terrain FY2003

Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Ice-Albedo Feedback Processes in the Arctic Basin

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Super-Parameterization of Boundary Layer Roll Vortices in Tropical Cyclone Models

Abyssal Current Steering of Upper Ocean Current Pathways in an Ocean Model with High Vertical Resolution

Satellite Observations of Surface Fronts, Currents and Winds in the Northeast South China Sea

Analysis of Mixing and Dynamics Associated with the Dissolution of Hurricane-Induced Cold Wakes

Estimation of Vertical Distributions of Water Vapor from Spaceborne Observations of Scattered Sunlight

Wavelet Spectral Finite Elements for Wave Propagation in Composite Plates

LAGRANGIAN MEASUREMENTS OF EDDY CHARACTERISTICS IN THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT

The Sediment Budget Calculator: A Webtool to Develop a Family of Viable Inlet and Adjacent Beach Sediment Budget Solutions

Using Dye to Study Lateral Mixing in the Ocean: 100 m to 1 km

Mass Transport by Second Mode Internal Solitary Waves

Dynamics of Droplet-Droplet and Droplet-Film Collision. C. K. Law Princeton University

Contract No. N C0123

Vortex Rossby Waves and Hurricane Evolution in the Presence of Convection and Potential Vorticity and Hurricane Motion

Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Modeling of the Coastal Zone

An Examination of 3D Environmental Variability on Broadband Acoustic Propagation Near the Mid-Atlantic Bight

STUDY OF DETECTION LIMITS AND QUANTITATION ACCURACY USING 300 MHZ NMR

Internal Tide Generation in the Indonesian Seas

Grant Number: N IP

MODELING SOLAR UV/EUV IRRADIANCE AND IONOSPHERE VARIATIONS WITH MT. WILSON MAGNETIC INDICIES

Babylonian resistor networks

An Observational and Modeling Study of Air-Sea Fluxes at Very High Wind Speeds

A GENERAL PROCEDURE TO SET UP THE DYADIC GREEN S FUNCTION OF MULTILAYER CONFORMAL STRUCTURES AND ITS APPLICATION TO MICROSTRIP ANTENNAS

Characterization of Caribbean Meso-Scale Eddies

Improved Parameterizations Of Nonlinear Four Wave Interactions For Application In Operational Wave Prediction Models

Transcription:

USMC Enlisted Endstrength Model MORS Workshop Personnel and National Security: A Quantitative Approach Working Group #2: Models for Managing Retention Molly F. McIntosh January 27, 2009

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JAN 2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE USMC Enlisted Endstrength Model 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) CNA,4825 Mark Center Drive,Alexandria,VA,22311 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Personnel and National Security: A Quantitative Approach (Unclass), 25-28 January 2010, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland. U.S. Government or Federal Rights License 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 22 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Background This model is an adaptation of an earlier CNA model developed to simulate endstrength changes during the 1990s force drawdown The model was updated for use in a project examining various aspects and future sustainability of a USMC force of 202K Predict future enlisted endstrength fixing accessions, or future accessions fixing enlisted endstrength Scenario simulations (ex: change in continuation rates) In today s session, I will demonstrate the model s functionality and present some results from scenario simulations 2

Endstrength Model overview: Projecting endstrength Beginning inventory, FY09 Continuation rates, FY08-FY09 Planned accessions FY09 FY10 FY11 Promotion distribution, FY08 FY12 FY13 Endstrength Model Future endstrength by paygrade and years of service FY09 FY10 FY11 Average years of service by paygrade FY09 FY10 FY11 Average years of service to promotion FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY12 FY13 FY12 FY13 3

Endstrength Model overview: Projecting accessions Beginning inventory, FY09 Continuation rates, FY08-FY09 Planned endstrength FY09 FY10 FY11 Promotion distribution, FY08 FY12 FY13 Endstrength Model Accessions required to meet planned endstrength FY09 FY10 FY11 Average years of service by paygrade FY09 FY10 FY11 Average years of service to promotion FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY12 FY13 FY12 FY13 4

Cost factors applied to the model s projections & cost factors: Basic pay Retirement e e accrual Housing allowance FICA Subsistence allowance Medical care PCS Does not include costs associated with advertising, enlistment bonuses, SRBs, and other reenlistment or separation incentives 5

Beginning FY 2009 Modify Beginning Inventory 47.5 5.6 % Accession survivors that are E2s % Accession survivors that are E3s Modify Pay Table Modify BAH Costs Modify Retirement Costs Modify Other Costs Modify Inflation Factors Modify Continuation Rates.0 % Accession survivors that are E4s 20.2 % YOS1 survivors that are E2s 72.4 % YOS1 survivors that are E3s 4.6 % YOS1 survivors that are E4s 3.9 % YOS2 survivors that are E2s 55.2 % YOS2 survivors that are E3s Modify Initial Promotion Distribution 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Modify Loss\Gain Adjustments for FY Modify Planned ES for Selected FY 42.88.95 % Accession For First Half of FY Survival Rate For First Half of FY Survival Rate For Second Half of FY 31400 2009 Accessions 28000 2010 Accessions 31500 2011 Accessions 34000 2012 Accessions 33000 2013 Accessions Endstrength Plan Mode (Leave unchecked for Accession Plan Mode) Output All Sheets View Average Longevity SHOW COSTS SHOW HELP HIDE HELP Output Result QUIT 6

Scenario 1: Force sustainment with high continuation rates FY08-FY09 continuation rates are 3.1% higher on average than FY00-FY01 100% 90% all YOS Continua ation rate across 80% 70% 60% FY00-FY01 FY08-FY09 50% E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 Paygrade Assume continuation rates stay high through FY 13 7

Scenario 1: End of FY09, model ES meets planned ES 200,000 182K 183K End-of-FY enlisted ends strength 150,000 100,000 50,000 86K 87K Predicted ES 38K 37K 29K 29K Planned ES 0 16K 16K 9K 9K 4K 4K 3K 2K E1-E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 Total Paygrade 8

Scenario 1: FY11-FY13, model ES exceeds planned ES 190,000000 Planned 181K enlisted ES for 202K total ES 182K 182K 183K 185K 185K End-of-FY enlisted end dstrength 180,000 170,000 160,000 150,000000 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 9

Scenario 1: FY09-FY13, seniority and time to promotion 30 25 20 Average YOS Average YOS to promotion FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Years of serv vice 15 10 5 0 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 Paygrade 10

Scenario 1: FY10-FY13 planned accessions are too high 40,000000 Planned accessions 35,000 30,000 29,576 31,922 30,992 26,517 ed accession ns 25,000 20,000 Enlist 15,000 10,000000 5,000 0 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 11

Scenario 1: Cost of the force will grow through FY13 Cost would increase by 15% over the next five years, from $15.7 billion in FY09 to $18.0 in FY13 (in constant FY09 dollars) Excludes advertising, enlistment bonus, SRB, and other reenlistment/separation incentive costs Most of the increase can be attributed to increases in basic pay outlays, which would rise by 19%, or from $5.5 billion to $5.7 billion 92% of this is due to rising seniority among the ranks Even if the force size stayed constant, increasing seniority alone would cause basic pay outlays to increase by 17% 12

Scenario 2: Force sustainment, normal continuation rates This scenario assumes that continuation rates remain at the FY08- FY09 level through FY11 and then drop to the FY00-FY01 level in FY12 and FY13 This drop in continuation rates could come about due to SRB budget reductions High take-up of the post-9/11 GI Bill Higher NEAS attrition rates Stricter enforcement of ECFC policies Separations caused by promotion stagnation to the middle and upper paygrades due to deviations from standard career progression precipitated by rapid 202K growth 13

Scenario 2: FY12-FY13, model ES meets planned ES 190,000 185K Planned 181K enlisted ES for 202K total ES 185K 180K 180K End-of-FY enlisted en ndstrength 180,000 170,000 160,000 150,000 FY12 FY13 Projected ES, low continuation rates Projected ES, high continuation rates 14

Scenario 2: Seniority, time to promotion, and cost Similar impact on average YOS and average YOS to promotion as in scenario 1, but smaller magnitudes Relative to high continuation rates, normal continuation rates cause seniority and time to promotion to increase by less Cost of the force remains flat at $15.7 billion through FY13 Near-zero growth in basic pay outlays Marginally smaller force in FY12 and FY13 v. Slightly more senior force in FY12 and FY13 than in earlier e years 15

Contact information: Molly F. McIntosh Research Analyst, CNA 4825 Mark Center Drive Alexandria,VA 22311 Office: 703.824.2965 Email: mcintoshm@cna.org 16

Back up slides 17

FY 2009 Beginning Inventory Years of service Paygrade E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 0 15,278 16,907 1,841 4 5 9 0 0 0 1 771 5,857 20,963 1,338 12 6 0 0 0 2 326 992 13,885 9,708 253 10 0 0 0 3 215 506 5,566 15,665 2,406 17 0 1 1 4 61 77 760 6,449 6,057 24 0 0 0 5 33 26 172 2,055 6,179 123 7 0 0 6 17 15 89 607 5,006 545 7 1 0 7 17 8 42 304 3,959 1,126 5 0 0 8 11 2 13 93 2,162 1,832 16 0 1 9 6 0 6 45 1,068 2,266266 53 0 0 10 6 1 1 27 667 2,348 165 2 0 11 1 1 11 439 2,144 537 2 0 12 4 1 3 11 224 1,466 925 4 0 13 4 0 0 2 35 926 1,058 28 1 14 0 0 0 1 17 622 1,141 70 1 15 2 0 0 0 9 545 1,161 164 4 16 3 2 0 0 2 388 969 293 4 17 2 1 0 1 5 325 736 447 7 18 2 0 0 0 3 258 607 565 14 19 2 0 1 1 2 195 521 626 26 20 1 0 0 0 0 25 202 505 49 21 1 0 0 0 1 4 93 410 86 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 327 108 23 1 0 0 0 0 1 7 220 156 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 168 216 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 203 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 34 195 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 192 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 154 29 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 30 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 43 SAVE BACK 18

FY 2008-2009 Continuation Rates Years of service Paygrade E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 0 0.91 0.95 0.97 0.43 0.03 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.69 0.94 0.97 0.98 0.84 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.50 0.86 0.96 0.98 0.94 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0.20 0.30 0.47 0.58 0.62 0.76 1.00 0.00 0.00 4 022 0.22 037 0.37 043 0.43 070 0.70 078 0.78 095 0.95 100 1.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 5 0.38 0.64 0.76 0.92 0.95 0.91 1.00 0.00 0.00 6 0.32 0.86 0.81 0.88 0.96 0.97 0.80 0.00 0.00 7 0.20 0.25 0.29 0.45 0.77 0.85 0.79 0.00 0.00 8 0.38 0.00 0.30 0.49 0.85 0.88 0.96 0.00 0.00 9 0.36 0.00 0.50 0.70 0.92 0.94 0.94 1.00 0.00 10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.60 0.91 0.94 0.92 1.00 0.00 11 0.40 0.00 1.00 0.47 0.76 0.93 0.91 1.00 0.00 12 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.40 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.50 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.96 0.97 1.00 1.00 14 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.00 15 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.97 0.97 0.98 1.00 16 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 17 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 18 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.12 0.48 0.83 0.96 20 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 012 0.12 048 0.48 078 0.78 090 0.90 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.79 0.90 22 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.31 0.79 0.93 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.77 0.89 24 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.91 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.58 0.88 26 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.89 27 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.88 28 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.88 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 30 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 SAVE BACK 19

FY 2008 Promotion Distribution Years of service Paygrade E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 0 0.96 0.73 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.03 0.24 0.45 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.01 0.03 0.42 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 000 0.00 000 0.00 001 0.01 022 0.22 002 0.02 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.00 0.00 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.00 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.00 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.26 0.00 0.00 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.22 0.02 0.00 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.04 0.00 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.10 0.01 15 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 004 0.04 017 0.17 000 0.00 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.22 0.01 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.03 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.07 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.15 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.14 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 26 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAVE BACK 20

FY 2009 Loss/Gain Adjustments Years of service Paygrade E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAVE BACK 21

FY 2009 Planned Endstrength Planned Paygrade endstrength E1 11,478 E2 23,614 E3 51,776 E4 37,026 E5 29,003 E6 15,832 E7 8,572 E8 3,837 E9 1,578 Total 182,716 SAVE BACK 22