Overview of Reacting Flow

Similar documents
Overview of Turbulent Reacting Flows

Reacting Flow Modeling in STAR-CCM+ Rajesh Rawat

Reacting flow modeling and applications in STAR-CCM+ Yongzhe Zhang, CD-adapco

DARS overview, IISc Bangalore 18/03/2014

Exploring STAR-CCM+ Capabilities, Enhancements and Practices for Aerospace Combustion. Niveditha Krishnamoorthy CD-adapco

DARS Digital Analysis of Reactive Systems

Current progress in DARS model development for CFD

Simulation of Selective Catalytic Reduction using DARS 1D Tool

MULTIPHASE FLOW MODELLING

Simulation of Engine Exhaust Aftertreatment with CFD using Detailed Chemistry

Best Practice Guidelines for Combustion Modeling. Raphael David A. Bacchi, ESSS

The Combination of Detailed Kinetics and CFD in Automotive Applications

Efficient Engine CFD with Detailed Chemistry

CFD Simulation of high pressure real gas flows

Computer Fluid Dynamics E181107

Large-eddy simulation of an industrial furnace with a cross-flow-jet combustion system

Mixing and Combustion in Dense Mixtures by William A. Sirignano and Derek Dunn-Rankin

Transported PDF Calculations of Combustion in Compression- Ignition Engines

Simulating the combustion of gaseous fuels 6th OpenFoam Workshop Training Session. Dominik Christ

Advanced Turbulence Models for Emission Modeling in Gas Combustion

Thermal NO Predictions in Glass Furnaces: A Subgrid Scale Validation Study

Topics in Other Lectures Droplet Groups and Array Instability of Injected Liquid Liquid Fuel-Films

HOW TO USE CHEMKIN 경원테크

A NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF COMBUSTION PROCESS IN AN AXISYMMETRIC COMBUSTION CHAMBER

ANSYS Advanced Solutions for Gas Turbine Combustion. Gilles Eggenspieler 2011 ANSYS, Inc.

INTRODUCTION TO CATALYTIC COMBUSTION

Process Chemistry Toolbox - Mixing

CALCULATION OF THE COMPRESSIBILITY FACTOR AND FUGACITY IN OIL-GAS SYSTEMS USING CUBIC EQUATIONS OF STATE

Numerical Modeling of Laminar, Reactive Flows with Detailed Kinetic Mechanisms

Combustion and Emission Modeling in CONVERGE with LOGE models

CFD Modeling Ensures Safe and Environmentally Friendly Performance in Shell Claus Off-Gas Treating (SCOT) Unit

Coupling of ChemApp and OpenFOAM

Simulation of soot formation and analysis of the "Advanced soot model" parameters in an internal combustion engine

CFD and Kinetic Analysis of Bluff Body Stabilized Flame

ADVANCED DES SIMULATIONS OF OXY-GAS BURNER LOCATED INTO MODEL OF REAL MELTING CHAMBER

Combustion. Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

Preface Acknowledgments Nomenclature

Soot formation in turbulent non premixed flames

HIGH-FIDELITY MODELS FOR COAL COMBUSTION: TOWARD HIGH-TEMPERATURE OXY-COAL FOR DIRECT POWER EXTRACTION

Section 14.1: Description of the Equilibrium Mixture Fraction/PDF Model. Section 14.2: Modeling Approaches for Non-Premixed Equilibrium Chemistry

DNS and LES of Turbulent Combustion

Lecture 9 Laminar Diffusion Flame Configurations

Exercises in Combustion Technology

Reactive Flows using TransAT. June 2013 Jan van Rickenbach, Daniel Rakotonirina ASCOMP

CoalGen 2009 Dynamic Control of SCR Minimum Operating Temperature

Department of Mechanical Engineering BM 7103 FUELS AND COMBUSTION QUESTION BANK UNIT-1-FUELS


Flame / wall interaction and maximum wall heat fluxes in diffusion burners

Which CHEMKIN is Right for You? Reaction Design

Thermochemistry X.S. Bai Thermochemistry

Injection and Combustion Principles at Rocket Conditions Malissa Lightfoot, Stephen Danczyk and Venke Sankaran

Combustion Theory and Applications in CFD

CFD study of gas mixing efficiency and comparisons with experimental data

Numerical Simulation of Hydrogen Gas Turbines using Flamelet Generated Manifolds technique on Open FOAM

Towards regime identification and appropriate chemistry tabulation for computation of autoigniting turbulent reacting flows

Aspen Dr. Ziad Abuelrub

Principles of Convective Heat Transfer

Adam G. Hawley Darin L. George. Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, TX 78238

LOW TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR PREMIXED METHANE FLAME COMBUSTION

Computational Combustion for the PetroChemical Process Industry

Introduction to laser-based combustion diagnostics

AAE COMBUSTION AND THERMOCHEMISTRY

SCR Catalyst Deactivation for PRB-Firing Coal Utility Boilers

Tutorial: Premixed Flow in a Conical Chamber using the Finite-Rate Chemistry Model

Modelling Detailed-Chemistry Effects on Turbulent Diffusion Flames using a Parallel Solution-Adaptive Scheme

Prediction of CO Burnout using a CHEMKIN based Network Tool

Emissions Catalyst Design using GT-SUITE. Dr. Chaitanya Sampara Viridis Chemicals Private Limited

A comparison between two different Flamelet reduced order manifolds for non-premixed turbulent flames

Unsteady Flamelet Modeling of Soot Formation in Turbulent Diffusion Flames

Numerical Modeling of Anode Baking Process with COMSOL Multiphysics

The Effect of Flame Structure on Soot Formation and Transport in Turbulent Nonpremixed Flames Using Direct Numerical Simulation

Development and Validation of a Partially Coupled Soot Model for Turbulent Kerosene Combustion in Industrial Applications

PVTpetro: A COMPUTATIONAL TOOL FOR ISOTHERM TWO- PHASE PT-FLASH CALCULATION IN OIL-GAS SYSTEMS

CFD modeling of combustion of a natural gas Light-Duty Engine

Numerical Combustion Modeling for Complex Reaction Systems

Diffusion and Reaction in Fe-Based Catalyst for Fischer- Tropsch Synthesis Using Micro Kinetic Rate Expressions

Ammonia Synthesis with Aspen Plus V8.0

NUMERICAL SOLUTION FOR THE COMBUSTION OF METHANE IN POROUS MEDIA

Experimental investigation of Methane Partial Oxidation for Hydrogen Production

Simulation of Particulate Solids Processing Using Discrete Element Method Oleh Baran

Heat Transfer Modeling using ANSYS FLUENT

Coupled field analyses for extremely high loaded thermal sensor

Survey of Turbulent Combustion Models for Large Eddy Simulations of Propulsive Flowfields

Thermoacoustic Instabilities Research

AUTOMOTIVE EXHAUST AFTERTREATMENT

Contents. Preface... xvii

Numerical Simulation and Experimental Analysis of an Oxygen-Enriched Combustion Fiberglass Furnace

Combustion Generated Pollutants

NO x Emissions Prediction from a Turbulent Diffusion Flame

Combustion: Flame Theory and Heat Produced. Arthur Anconetani Oscar Castillo Everett Henderson

Equations of State. Equations of State (EoS)

Rigorous calculation of LNG flow reliefs using the GERG-2004 equation of state

2011 DOE Crosscut Workshop on Lean Emissions Reduction Simulation April 2011 Dearborn, MI

Chemical and Engineering Thermodynamics

USE OF EQUATIONS OF STATE (EOS) SOFTWARE. Donald P. Mayeaux. President A+ Corporation, LLC Black Bayou Rd. Gonzales, LA USA

Simplified kinetic schemes for oxy-fuel combustion

Detailed Chemical Kinetics in Multidimensional CFD Using Storage/Retrieval Algorithms

Chapter 13. Modeling Species Transport and Finite-Rate Chemistry

Chapter 1 Introduction and Basic Concepts

CONTENTS Real chemistry e ects Scramjet operating envelope Problems

Transcription:

Overview of Reacting Flow

Outline Various Applications Overview of available reacting flow models Latest additions Example Cases Summary

Reacting Flows Applications in STAR-CCM+ Chemical Process Industry (liquid-liquid reactions) Finite-rate chemistry model with a flexibility to modify EOS EMP inter/intra-phase reactions Moment methods Surface Chemistry Rocket Engines (Solid, Liquid, and Hybrid) Particle Reactions in Lagrangian Real Gas model with all Combustion Models Coupled Solver High-speed jet engines (Ramjet, Scramjet) Coupled solver with combustion models Oil and Gas Multiple-Phase reactions (intraphase and interphase)

Reacting Flows Applications in STAR-CCM+ Ever-Expanding application coverage Gas turbine, process heaters, burners, and furnaces Partially-premixed combustion models LES Soot and Nox models Chemical Vapor Deposition Detailed/Global Surface chemistry multi-component diffusion Aftertreatment (Automotive) Detailed/Global Surface chemistry Coupled with liquid film and porous media Energy Industry (Coal and Biomass combustion) Multiple Coal Types and cofiring with gas-fuel

Reacting Flow Models in STAR-CCM+ Non-Premixed Combustion EBU Standard, Hybrid, Finite-Rate User Defined PPDF (Multi-stream) Equilibrium Flamelet PVM (Chemistry Table) Premixed Combustion CFM (Choice for Laminar flame speed) PEBU TFC Partially-Premixed Combustion PCFM Equilibrium Flamelet EBU PVM PTFC Finite-Rate Chemistry Calculation using DARS-CFD EDC ISAT Dynamic Load Balancing Surface Reactions Soot and Nox Emission Models

Latest Additions (v 8/9) Micromixing Models Surface Chemistry Global mechanisms Combustion Models with Real Gases SRK and Peng-Robinson EOS Soot Model MBH Model Soot absorption properties Eulerian Multi-phase Reaction Model Flexibility to add user defined reactions Complex Chemistry Model (DARS-CFD) ISAT Analytical Jacobian PaSR Performance

New Micromixing Model for Liquid Reactions in 9.02 Eddy Contact Micromixing Model (based on Froney and Nafia, Chem Eng Sc, 2000) for Liquid-Liquid Reactions. Users will have choice of three mixing scales - Kolmogorov (corresponds to Engulfment type of mixing) - Classical Scalar Mixing (considers high Sc number) - User Defined (ability to do user defined ff) - Kinetics Only (No Micromixing) The above four choices are available for each reaction

Micromixing Model Eddy Contact Micromixing

Eddy Contact Micromixing

Validation Case Low Re flow in Coaxial Jet The results compared to the numerical of Forney and Nafia (2000) and experimental data of Li and Toor (1986) at low high Reynolds number. Reactants A and B react in aqueous solution

Mass Fractions of A, B, R (Desired) and S

% Yield of R Results (% Yield of R) Comparison with Experimental Data 100 Experiment (Li & Toor, 1986) 90 Hybrid EBU Eddy Contact Micromxing (Kolmogorov) Eddy Contact Micromxing (Classical Scalar Mixing) Froney & Nafia Paper, 2000 80 70 60 50 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Reynolds Number Micromixing Models predictions are much better than EBU Classical Scalar Mixing time scale appears to give best match

Surface Reactions No DARS-CFD licenses are required Users can add their own reactions Same interface for adding reactions as gas-phase reactions

Applications Tools Porous chemistry Global Surface chemistry Detailed Surface Chemistry CVD Reactors After-treatment devices: - Three-Way Catalytic Converters (TWC) - Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) - Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) - Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)

Results NOx Reduction Comparison Two-Step Model Detailed Surface Chemistry

Real Fluid Modeling in STAR-CCM+ - Real Fluid Physics in STAR-CCM+ - Van der Waals - Redlich-Kwong (RK) - Peng-Robinson (PR) - Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK, available in 8.02) - Modified Soave-Redlich-Kwong (MSRK, available in 8.02) - All above Equation of Sates are Cubic

Real Fluid Thermodynamic Departures Enthalpy : Specific Heat : Entropy : Speed of Sound :

Results (Density Comparison) PR SRK Ideal Gas

Soot modeling Two-Equation Soot Model Transport equations are solved for two soot variables Soot number density (N) and Soot Mass density (M) Key physical processes are : Nucleation Coagulation Soot growth Soot oxidation

Nucleation PAH inception Acetylene inception C 2 H 2, C 6 H 6, C 6 H 5, H 2 C 2 H 2 Compute from: 1. Species list 2. Empirical (nonpremixed)

Two-equation model without radiation All the scaling factors for source terms are 1.0 Two-equation model with radiation Moments model with radiation

Inter-Phase Reactions with EMP Following Options are Provided First-order combined rate Half-order combined rate Second-order combined rate User reaction rate 23

Gas phase reaction setup in STAR-CCM+ When using the built-in reaction rate expression, input the temperature exponent activation energy pre-exponent, and the diffusion coefficient. 24

General Overview of Furnace Flow Fe 2 O 3 Ore / Coke Layer - Falls down very slowly. Fe 3 O 4 FeO Fe Cohesive Zone - Ore layer temperature increases - Blocked gas passage due to melted ore - Cohesive zone of large volume Gas - Hot gas injection - Flow upward through ore / coke layers - Lost of heat into ore / coke layers - Chemical reactions with ore / coke

Eulerian porous media approach Gas Phase Three components: CO/CO2/N2 Porous media Three components: Fe/Ore/Coke Boundary conditions: Outlet boundary: Pressure outlet Inlet boundary: Mass fraction of the gas phase: CO/N2=0.8/0.2. Velocity = 15 m/s, Temperature = 2000K 26

Chemical reactions Two reactions C + CO2 -> 2CO Fe2O3 + 3CO -> 2Fe + 3CO2 Time step: 1 sec The model is stable and fast: 32 processors, one hour, simulated around 3000 seconds in the physical time. 27

Coke and Ore particle area 28

Conversion of Ore into Fe 29

Eulerian multiphase: 2-phase model Full size furnace: 25m height 7.2m hearth diameter 2D axisymmetric model Multi-component Eulerian phases: Gas phase: CO, CO2, N2 Solid phase: Ore, Coke, Fe, Fe2O3, C Two reactions: Fe2O3 + 3CO -> 2Fe + 3CO2 C + CO2 -> 2CO 30

Volume Fractions 31

Temperatures 32

Complex Chemistry Can read Chemkin format and no limit on number of species Online tabulation using ISAT is available Factor of 2-5 speedup is commonly observed Dynamic load balancing is available to achieve scalability for chemistry calculation with large number of processors. DARS-Basic provides tool to reduce the chemistry that can be imported in STAR-CCM+ for further speedup for complex chemistry calculations.

Partially-Stirred Reactor (PaSR) in STAR-CCM+ 9.02 PaSR representative of real turbulent combustion simulations Chemistry represented by a finite number of particles Particle composition evolves by pair-wise mixing and chemical reaction Can be used to test different combustion models for representing detailed chemistry Computationally inexpensive compared to real simulations ideal for initial testing and setup

Analytical Jacobian for Dars-CFD Dars-CFD ODE integrator used for computing reaction solution ODE integration involves the use of Jacobian Computing Jacobian numerically using divided-difference is expensive and inaccurate Additional benefits when used with ISAT due to increased accuracy of sensitivity matrix and reduced CPU time per add Collaborating with Prof. Lu, University of Connecticut, to integrate use of analytical Jacobian in Dars-CFD ODE integrator

Performance Test Case Baseline v8.02 Case 1 v8.06 Case 2 v9.01 dev Description - 49 Species - Cp and Mw use Mixture Methods - 49 Species - Cp and Mw use Table Methods - 49 Species - Cp and Mw use Table Methods - Uniform mixture fraction spacing - Efficient retrieval of Table entries

Performance/Speed Comparison Test Case Baseline v8.02 Solver CPU Time (Serial Run) sec 19078 s Case 1 v8.06 13040 s - 31.6% faster than Baseline Case 2 v9.01 dev 8940 s - 53% faster than Baseline - 31% faster than Case 2

Solver CPU time (sec) Performance/Speed Comparison Speed Comparision (Flamelet Model) 25000 20000 8.02 15000 8.06 10000 9.02 5000 0 STAR-CCM+ Version

Conclusions Expanding Application Coverage Eulerian Multi-Phase with Reactions LES effective but expensive High fidelity calculations Finite-rate kinetics Library-based Direct chemistry coupling (no additional license requirement) Speedup (Detailed Chemistry) Load balancing Analytical Jacobian ISAT Performance Improvement

More Examples Note that close burner spacing in the center of the furnace leads to oxygen-starved areas up into the convection section 02/01/12 adapco Report 531-0015-001 Page 40