Introduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting Electrical Circuits

Similar documents
Quantum computation with superconducting qubits

Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Lecture 9 Superconducting qubits Ref: Clarke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).

Superconducting Qubits. Nathan Kurz PHYS January 2007

Strong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit

Superconducting quantum bits. Péter Makk

Supercondcting Qubits

Quantum dynamics in Josephson junction circuits Wiebke Guichard Université Joseph Fourier/ Néel Institute Nano Department Equipe Cohérence quantique

Quantum Spectrometers of Electrical Noise

Quantum computation and quantum information

Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173

Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout

Topologicaly protected abelian Josephson qubits: theory and experiment.

Dissipation in Transmon

INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD

Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing

Coherent oscillations in a charge qubit

M.C. Escher. Angels and devils (detail), 1941

Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits

Lecture 10 Superconducting qubits: advanced designs, operation 1 Generic decoherence problem: Λ 0 : intended

From SQUID to Qubit Flux 1/f Noise: The Saga Continues

Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)

Quantum Information Processing, Vol. 3, No. 1, February 2004 ( 2004) Implementing Qubits with Superconducting Integrated Circuits

Superposition of two mesoscopically distinct quantum states: Coupling a Cooper-pair box to a large superconducting island

Quantum Confinement in Graphene

Rabi oscillations, Ramsey fringes and spin echoes in an electrical circuit

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014

Quantize electrical circuits

2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi

The Physics of Nanoelectronics

Introduction to Circuit QED

6.4 Physics of superconducting quantum circuits

INTRODUCTION TO NMR and NMR QIP

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4

Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator

Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator

Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED

Theoretical Analysis of A Protected Superconducting Qubit

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 16 Feb 2004

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

Quantum computation and quantum optics with circuit QED

Superconducting Qubits

Superconducting Qubits Coupling Superconducting Qubits Via a Cavity Bus

Mesoscopic Nano-Electro-Mechanics of Shuttle Systems

Topological Quantum Computation with Majorana Zero Modes. Roman Lutchyn. Microsoft Station

Lecture 2, March 1, 2018

Preface. Preface to the Third Edition. Preface to the Second Edition. Preface to the First Edition. 1 Introduction 1

Mesoscopic quantum measurements

Parity-Protected Josephson Qubits

Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits

Superconducting phase qubits

Hybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble

Quantum phase slip junctions

Quantum physics in quantum dots

Superconductors: Quantum circuits

Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering

Lecture 13: Barrier Penetration and Tunneling

Flux Noise due to Spins in SQUIDs. Stephanie LaForest B.Sc., Queen s University, 2011

There is light at the end of the tunnel. -- proverb. The light at the end of the tunnel is just the light of an oncoming train. --R.

single-electron electron tunneling (SET)

Chapter 5 Nanomanipulation. Chapter 5 Nanomanipulation. 5.1: With a nanotube. Cutting a nanotube. Moving a nanotube

Physics of Semiconductors (Problems for report)

Quantum Reservoir Engineering

Superconducting persistent-current qubit Orlando, T.P.; Mooij, J.E.; Tian, Lin; Wal, Caspar H. van der; Levitov, L.S.; Lloyd, Seth; Mazo, J.J.

Strong-coupling Circuit QED

Decoherence in Josephson and Spin Qubits. Lecture 3: 1/f noise, two-level systems

Sketch of the MRI Device

Introduction to Superconductivity. Superconductivity was discovered in 1911 by Kamerlingh Onnes. Zero electrical resistance

Solid-State Spin Quantum Computers

Superconducting Circuits and Quantum Information

Modeling Schottky barrier SINIS junctions

Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits

Materials Origins of Decoherence in Superconducting Qubits Robert McDermott

Introduction to Molecular Electronics. Lecture 1: Basic concepts

Lecture 6 Photons, electrons and other quanta. EECS Winter 2006 Nanophotonics and Nano-scale Fabrication P.C.Ku

INTRODUCTION À LA PHYSIQUE MÉSOSCOPIQUE: ÉLECTRONS ET PHOTONS INTRODUCTION TO MESOSCOPIC PHYSICS: ELECTRONS AND PHOTONS

Tuning a short coherence length Josephson junction through a metal-insulator transition

Quantum Computing with neutral atoms and artificial ions

SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM BITS

Lecture 6. Josephson junction circuits. Simple current-biased junction Assume for the moment that the only source of current is the bulk leads, and

INTRODUCTION À LA PHYSIQUE MÉSOSCOPIQUE: ÉLECTRONS ET PHOTONS INTRODUCTION TO MESOSCOPIC PHYSICS: ELECTRONS AND PHOTONS

Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits

Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots. slides courtesy of Lieven Vandersypen, TU Delft

Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 8 Physical Implementations

From Majorana Fermions to Topological Order

Lecture 8, April 12, 2017

Metastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator

Principles and Applications of Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs)

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C3: CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS

Majorana bound states in spatially inhomogeneous nanowires

Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime

Electron spin qubits in P donors in Silicon

CIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM

Lecture contents. A few concepts from Quantum Mechanics. Tight-binding model Solid state physics review

Decoherence in a superconducting quantum bit circuit

Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots

Transcription:

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting lectrical Circuits What is superconductivity? What is a osephson junction? What is a Cooper Pair Box Qubit? Quantum Modes of Superconducting Transmission Lines See R.-S. Huang PhD thesis on Boulder 004 web page

What is superconductivity? See: Boulder Lectures 000 Cooper pairs are like bosons in a BC -- except -- size of Cooper pair spacing between electrons Complex order parameter like BC ψ ( r) c c k k kfξ >> 1 k ψ ( r) ψ e i ϕ ( r) k

xcitation Gap for Fermions broken pair In a semiconductor the gap is tied to the spatial lattice (only occurs at one special density commensurate with lattice) In a superconductor, gap is tied to fermi level. Compressible. k

WHY SUPRCONDUCTIVITY? few electrons N ~ 10 9 forest of states total number of electrons N even ~ 1 ev ~ 1meV superconducting gap ATOM SUPRCONDUCTING NANOLCTROD

nergy vs. Particle Number on Grain. N-1 N N+1 N+ N+3 N+4... osephson tunneling between two grains N1, N N1 N 1, + 1 N1, N +

osephson Tunneling I Coherent tunneling of Cooper pairs Restrict Hilbert space to quantum ground states of the form N n, N + n, n =... 3,, 1,0, + 1, +, + 3... 1. 4-3 - -1 0 +1 + +3 +4.. n

osephson Tunneling II Restrict Hilbert space to quantum ground states of the form N n, N + n n, n =... 3,, 1,0, + 1, +, + 3... 1. 4-3 - -1 0 +1 + +3 +4.. n=+ T = n+ 1 n + n n+ 1 n= = G t 8 / e h normal state conductance sc gap Tight binding model: single particle hopping on a 1D lattice N.B. not 1/

osephson Tunneling III. 4-3 - -1 0 +1 + +3 +4.. Tight binding model n=+ T = n+ 1 n + n n+ 1 n= position n wave vector ϕ (compact!) plane wave eigenstate n' =+ n' = ϕ n=+ = e iϕ n n = " e ikx " n= n=+ iϕ n T ϕ = n' + 1 n' + n' n' + 1 e n n=

osephson Tunneling IV. 4-3 - -1 0 +1 + +3 +4.. n' =+ iϕ n T ϕ = n' + 1 n' + n' n' + 1 e n n' = n=+ n= n=+ iϕ n T ϕ = e n+ 1 + n 1 n= T ϕ = cos( ϕ) ϕ ϕ

Supercurrent through a. 4-3 - -1 0 +1 + +3 +4.. position n momentum ϕ T ϕ = cos( ) ϕ ϕ Wave packet group velocity ϕ dn 1 dt = = dt dϕ current: sinϕ dn e I = ( e) = sinϕ dt e I = Icsin ϕ Ic

Charging nergy N n, N + n n, n=... 3,, 1,0, + 1, +, + 3... 1 e c C U = n = 4 n ( e) C c U n

Second Quantization ϕ n=+ = e iϕ n n = " e ikx " n= Number Operator: ˆn i H = nˆ ϕ 4 c cos( ) H = 4c cos( ϕ) ϕ HΨ ( ϕ) = ( ϕ) Ψ ( ϕ) j j j ϕ ϕ Now viewed as coordinate Ψ j ( ϕ) Describes quantum amplitude for (quantum) phase

Weak Charging Limit: osephson Plasma Oscillations c Simple harmonic oscillator H = nˆ ϕ 4 c cos( ) H = 4c cos( ϕ) ϕ ϕ H 4c + 1+ ϕ spring constant K = mass M = 1 8 c ω = 8 c

Weak Charging Limit: osephson Plasma Oscillations c (heavy mass, small quantum fluctuations) spring constant K = mass M = 1 8 c ϕ Weak anharmonicity can be used to form qubit and readout levels ω = 8 c

Strong Charging Limit: Cooper Pair Box 4 c ϕ Fluctuates too wildly; better to use number (position) representation C 500aF C K U -1 0 +1 + n Random offset charge due to built in asymmetry

TH BAR OSPHSON UNCTION: SIMPLST SOLID STAT ATOM osephson junction with no wires to rest of world: superconductor tunnel oxide layer superconductor Hamiltonian: ( ˆ ) H = 4 n Q / e cos ϕ +... C r 3 parameters: Q r = G t 8 e / h residual offset charge osephson energy negligible terms at small T C = e C Coulomb energy

IMPRFCTIONS OF UNCTION PARAMTRS CHARGD IMPURITY TUNNL CHANNL LCTRIC DIPOLS _ + - 1nm CAN IN PRINCIPL MAK UNCTION PRFCT, BUT MANWHIL...

UNCTION PARAMTR FLUCTUATIONS stat r = r + r Q Q Q t stat = + stat C = C + C ( ) t () t () param. dispers. Q r stat random! stat 10% stat C 10% noise sd@1hz Q r /e ~10-3 Hz -1/ / 10-5 -10-6 Hz -1/ C / C <10-6 Hz -1/? O th order problem: get rid of randomness of static offset charge! solutions: - control offset charge with a gate Cooper pair box (charge qubit) or - make / very large RF-SQUID C (flux qubit) Cur. Biased. (phase qubit)

SNSITIVITY TO NOIS OF VARIOUS QUBITS junction noise port noise qubits Q r C technical quantum backaction charge flux phase charge qubit flux qubit phase qubit

COOPR BOX STRATGY U charge deg. point U U n n compensate static offset charge with gate ( ˆ ) H = 4 n N cos ϕ +... gate charge can be controlled N g =C g U/e C n=+ T = cosϕ = n+ 1 n + n n+ 1 n= g

Mapping to two level system U 0 1 n z 1 σ nˆ = n= ( ˆ ) H = 4 n N cos ϕ +... n=+ T = cosϕ = n+ 1 n + n n+ 1 C g x σ

Mapping to two level system U 0 1 n nˆ = z 1 σ ˆ = ˆ [ n n] ( ) z x H = C 1 Ng σ σ + constant... x z Rotate: z z + x x ( ) x z H = C 1 Ng σ + σ + constant...

Mapping to two level system ( ) x z H = C 1 Ng σ + σ + constant... B H = Biσ ε ± =± B + B x z 0 ( Ng 1) U U n n

SPLIT COOPR PAIR BOX U gate N g I is actually a SQUID Q φ I coil φ cos π φ max = 0

Split Cooper Pair Box ( ) x z H = C 1 Ng σ + σ + constant... is actually a SQUID V g φ max = cos π φ 0 (Buttiker 87; Bouchiat et al., 98)

Superconducting Tunnel unction as a Covalently Bonded Diatomic Molecule (simplified view at charge deg. point) 8 N 10 N +1 pairs N pairs aluminum island tunnel barrier aluminum island N pairs N +1 pairs 1µ m Cooper Pair osephson Tunneling Splits the Bonding and Anti-bonding Molecular Orbitals anti-bonding bonding

Bonding Anti-bonding Splitting 1 ψ = ± ± ( ) 8 10 + 1 10 8 10 8 8 10 + 1 = 7 GHz 0.3 K anti-bonding bonding = = bonding anti-bonding osephson coupling H = σ z

Dipole Moment of the Cooper-Pair Box (determines polarizability) V g L = 10 µm 1 nm - - - - - - + + + + = V g / L C 1 C V g + + C 3 0 = = bonding anti-bonding H = z σ d Vg L x σ 1/ C d = ( e ) L 1/ C 1+ 1/ C + 1/ C 3 d ~e -µ m

nergy nergy, Charge, and Capacitance of the CPB H z = σ d V L g x σ Charge no charge signal Q = d dv charge Capacitance C = dq dv polarizability is state dependent 0 1 CV g g / e deg. pt. = coherence sweet spot

RSPONSS OF BOX IN ACH LVL sweet spot nergy ( k B K) hν 01 1 0 loop current box inductance L φ/φ 0 =δ/π I k k φ k = φ k = island charge 1 box capacitance N g =C g U/e Q C k k k = U = U k

Dephasing, decoherence, decay 15 0.658 10 ev-s 15 1 nv acting on charge e for 1 µ s = 10 ev-s Spins very coherent but hard to couple and very hard to measure.

Avoiding Dephasing box 1 0 0 1 1/ C V g e g ν 'sweet spot' for T ϕ() t = i dt ν( t ) t ν V 0 ψ() t = cos θ / 1+ e ϕ sin θ / 0 ( ) i () t ( ) g Vion et al. Science 00 = Q Q = 0

Atomic spectral line 38 switching probability (%) 36 34 3 N g = 0.5 φ = 0 τ = 4 µs Lorentzian fit: ν 01 = 16463.64 MHz Q ~0 000 30 16460 1646 16464 16466 16468 ν (MHz) Courtesy M. Devoret

RLAXATION TIM AT OPTIMAL POINT 50 t w switching probability (%) 45 40 35 xponential fit: T 1 = 1.84 µs Q 1 ~ 90 000 30 0 1 4 5 6 7 time t w (µs)

PRINCIPL OF RAMSY XPRIMNT 90º pulse free evolution 90º pulse preparation measurement time 90º pulse free evolution 90º pulse preparation measurement

switching probability (%) 45 40 35 30 Courtesy M. Devoret RAMSY FRINGS ν RF = 16409.50 MHz Q ϕ ~ 5000 (8000 fringes) 0.0 0.1 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time between pulses t (µs) t