Representations of su(2)

Similar documents
Representations of Matrix Lie Algebras

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.

CLASSICAL GROUPS DAVID VOGAN

Exercises Lie groups

Topics in Representation Theory: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Symmetric Spaces Toolkit

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 3 6 April 2010

Representations of Lorentz Group

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Representation Theory

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1

Plan for the rest of the semester. ψ a

Unitary rotations. October 28, 2014

Notes 2 for MAT4270 Connected components and universal covers π 0 and π 1.

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2)

MIRANDA SEITZ-MCLEESE

Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations

The Spinor Representation

Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.

The groups SO(3) and SU(2) and their representations

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Econ 204 Supplement to Section 3.6 Diagonalization and Quadratic Forms. 1 Diagonalization and Change of Basis

Chapter 7. Canonical Forms. 7.1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Topics in linear algebra

Introduction to Group Theory

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Special Lecture - The Octionions

Real representations

9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence

Spectral Theorem for Self-adjoint Linear Operators

Problem set 2. Math 212b February 8, 2001 due Feb. 27

ALGEBRA 8: Linear algebra: characteristic polynomial

Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.

Definition (T -invariant subspace) Example. Example

LIE GROUPS, LIE ALGEBRAS, AND APPLICATIONS IN PHYSICS

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

1 Last time: least-squares problems

NONCOMMUTATIVE POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS. Edward S. Letzter. Introduction

Final Exam. Linear Algebra Summer 2011 Math S2010X (3) Corrin Clarkson. August 10th, Solutions

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Algebra I Fall 2007

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)

The Gelfand-Tsetlin Basis (Too Many Direct Sums, and Also a Graph)

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Linear algebra 2. Yoav Zemel. March 1, 2012

The Solovay-Kitaev theorem

Introduction to Lie Groups

Matrix Lie groups. and their Lie algebras. Mahmood Alaghmandan. A project in fulfillment of the requirement for the Lie algebra course

IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS. Contents

Physics 129B, Winter 2010 Problem Set 4 Solution

Group Theory - QMII 2017

Quadratic Forms. Marco Schlichting Notes by Florian Bouyer. January 16, 2012

18.S34 linear algebra problems (2007)

8. COMPACT LIE GROUPS AND REPRESENTATIONS

About Lie Groups. timothy e. goldberg. October 6, Lie Groups Beginning Details The Exponential Map and Useful Curves...

Definition 1.1 A linear group is a closed subgroup of GL(n, R).

Some notes on linear algebra

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Throughout these notes we assume V, W are finite dimensional inner product spaces over C.

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 1.

MATRIX LIE GROUPS. Claudiu C Remsing. Dept of Mathematics (Pure and Applied) Rhodes University Grahamstown September Maths Seminar 2007

Solutions to Example Sheet 1

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n)

Linear Algebra. Workbook

THE EIGENVALUE PROBLEM

Lecture 10: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues (Numerical Recipes, Chapter 11)

DIAGONALIZATION. In order to see the implications of this definition, let us consider the following example Example 1. Consider the matrix

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Numerical Linear Algebra Homework Assignment - Week 2

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

Review of Linear Algebra Definitions, Change of Basis, Trace, Spectral Theorem

Matrices of Dirac Characters within an irrep

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 4: THE SPECTRAL THEOREM

Symmetry and degeneracy

QM and Angular Momentum

Representation Theory

Transcription:

Representations of su2 The purpose of these notes is to construct the representations of su2 using the method of weightvectors, based on the discussion of the representations of sl2, R in the notes for course Ma2 Group Representations by Dr Timothy Murphy. This is interesting because it corresponds to the quantum mechanical description of angular momentum, which we very briefly discuss at the end. 1 Lie and linear groups Chris Blair, May 2009 We begin with some background material. Recall that a Lie group is a differential manifold with a group structure, such that the group operations of multiplication and inversion are differentiable, and that the Lie algebra of a Lie group is the tangent space to the group at the identity. The most commonly used Lie groups are matrix groups, and we will focus on these, disregarding the manifold structure. We denote the set of all n n matrices over the field k by Matn, k, where k = R, C, H. The space of invertible matrices over k is denoted by GLn, k. Such matrices form a group under matrix multiplication. A linear group is a closed subgroup of GLn, R. For X Matn, k we define the exponential map exp : Mn, k GLn, k by exp X = Convergence follows using the matrix norm, by comparison with the scalar case. Note that if X has eigenvalues λ i then exp X has eigenvalues e λi. From this we have the useful property that the determinant of exp X is the exponential of the trace of X, as the determinant of a matrix is the product of the eigenvalues while the trace is the sum, so det exp X = e λ1... e λn = e λ1+ +λn. The commutator of two matrices is defined by n=0 X n n! [X, Y ] = XY Y X If [X, Y ] = 0 then exp X exp Y = exp Y exp X = expx + Y. From this it follows that exp X is always invertible with inverse exp X. The Lie algebra of a linear group linear group G is the space LG defined by LG = {X Matn, R : exptx G t R} It is a vector space, and the commutator gives a bilinear skew-symmetric form on LG satisfying Jacobi s identity: [X, [Y, Z]] + cyclic permuations = 0. In this context, the commutator is called the Lie product on LG. This definition of the Lie algebra of a linear group agrees with the general definition of a Lie algebra as a vector space over k equipped with a bilinear skew-symmetric form satisfying Jacobi s identity. A homomorphism of Lie algebras f : L M is a linear map which preserves the Lie product, f[x, Y ] = [fx, fy ]. Given a homomorphism F : G H of linear groups then there exists a unique homomorphism f = LF : LG LH of the corresponding Lie algebras, such that exp fx = F exp X for all X LG. As a representation of a group G is simply a homorphism from the group to the space of invertible linear maps over some vector space V, this has implications for the representations of Lie algebras. First let us give an exact definition: a representation of a Lie algebra over k in a vector space V over k is defined by a bilinear map L V V, denoted by X, v Xv, satisfying [X, Y ]v = XY v Y Xv. Note that we always view LG as a real vector space yet are primarily interested in representations over C. We thus introduce the complexification of a Lie algebra CL as the complex Lie algebra derived from L by allowing multiplication by complex scalars. Then we have that every real representation α of the 1

linear group G in V gives rise to a representation Lα of the corresponding Lie algebra LG in U, while every complex representation α of G in V gives rise to a representation Lα of the complexified Lie algebra CLG in V, with each representation characterised by explαx = αexp X for all X LG. A particular consequence of this definition is that the representations over C of Lie algebras with isomorphic complexifications are in one-to-one correspondence. The usual properties and operations for representations then hold for representations of Lie algebras. We also have that α is semisimple if and only if Lα is semisimple. If G is simply connected then every representation α of LG can be lifted to a unique representation α of G such that α = Lα. 2 SU2 The group SU2 is the group of all two-by-two unitary matrices with determinant equal to one: Say X su2, that is exp tx SU2 t R, so and also SU2 = {X Mat2, C : X X = XX = I, det X = 1} exp tx exp tx = exp tx + X = I X = X det exp tx = exp tr tx = exp ttr X = 1 tr X = 0 t R hence the Lie algebra su2 of SU2 consists of all traceless two-by-two skew-hermitian matrices: su2 = {X Mat2, C : X = X, tr X = 0} A basis for this space is U = 1 2 0 1 1 0 V = 1 2 0 i i 0 W = 1 2 i 0 0 i note that this is the usual basis for su2 rescaled by a factor of one-half. The Lie algebra structure is given by the commutators of the basis elements: [U, V ] = 1 0 1 0 i 1 0 i 0 1 = 1 2i 0 = W 1 0 i 0 i 0 1 0 0 2i [V, W ] = 1 0 i i 0 i 0 0 i = 1 0 2 = U i 0 0 i 0 i i 0 2 0 [W, U] = 1 i 0 0 1 0 1 i 0 = 1 0 2i = V 0 i 1 0 1 0 0 i 2i 0 hence su2 = U, V, W : [U, V ] = W, [W, U] = V, [V, W ] = U We will use an algebraic method to determine the representations of this Lie algebra. First, let H = 2iW E = U iv F = U iv 2

then [H, E] = 2i [W, U] i[w, V ] = 2iV + iu = 2E [H, E] = 2i [W, U] i[w, V ] = 2i V + iu = 2F [E, F ] = i[u, V ] i[v, U] = 2iW = H Now let α be a simple representation of su2 in a finite dimensional vector space V, and let us consider the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of H: Hv = λv. We shall call λ a weight of H and v a weight-vector, with Sλ = {v V : Hv = λv} being the corresponding weight-space. Now, and HEv = HE EH + EHv = E + EHv = λ + 2v Ev Sλ + 2 HF v = HF F H + F Hv = F + F Hv = λ 2v F v Sλ 2 so we see that E is a raising operator while F is a lowering operator: applying E moves us up a weight-space, while applying F moves us down a weight-space. Applying first one then the other leaves us in the same space that we started in, EF v, F Ev Sλ. Now as our vector space V is finite-dimensional there can only be a finite number of weight-vectors, so if we start with some weight-vector v and apply E repeatedly we will eventually get zero, i.e. E r v 0 but E r+1 v = 0 and similarly for F. Let us take a weight-vector v µ with weight µ such that Ee = 0, so that µ is the maximal weight. Acting on e with F we obtain weight-vectors v µ 2 = F v µ, v µ = F 2 v µ,... with weights µ 2, µ,... and for some integer r we will have F r v µ 0, F r+1 v µ = 0. So in general we have Hv w = wv w F v w = v w 2 We now claim that EF v w = awv w F Ev w = bwv w i.e. acting on v w with first F then E or vice-versa gives us a scalar multiple of v w. Note that we have Hv w = [E, F ]v w = aw bw aw bw = w We show the claim by induction on w. Starting at the maximal weight, we have F Ev µ = 0 hence the result holds with bµ = 0 and aµ = µ. Now suppose it is true for v µ, v µ 2,..., v w+2. Then so the result holds with bw = aw + 2, or F Ev w = F EF v w+2 = F aw + 2v w+2 = aw + 2v w aw = aw + 2 + w This gives us a recursive formula for aw. Note that we have aµ = µ, aµ 2 = aµ + µ 2, and for w = µ 2k, aµ 2k = µ + µ 2 + + µ 2k so aµ 2k = µk + 1 2 k i=0 aµ 2k = k + 1 µ k i = µk + 1 + 2 1 kk + 1 2 3

or using k = 1 2 µ w and as bw = aw + 2, aw = 1 µ w + 2µ + w = 1 bw = 1 µµ + 2 ww + 2 µµ + 2 ww 2 Now applying F to v µ 2r gives zero, hence aµ 2r = 0 meaning r + 1 µ r = 0 µ = r so we conclude that the weights run from r down to r and take only integral values. We also have now found that the space v r, v r 2,..., v r is stable under su2 and so is the whole of V and carries a representation of degree r + 1. It follows that there is one simple representation of su2 of each dimension. The actions of F and E are found as follows: Ev w = EF v w+2 = aw + 2v w+2 = 1 rr + 2 ww + 2 v w+2 F v w = F Ev w 2 = aw 2v w 2 = 1 rr + 2 ww 2 v w 2 from which we recover and Uv w = 1 2 E F v w = 1 8 V v w = i 2 E + F v w = i 8 [ ] rr + 2 ww + 2 v w+2 rr + 2 ww 2 v w 2 [ ] rr + 2 ww + 2 v w+2 + rr + 2 ww 2 v w 2 W v w = i 2 wv w Finally we can express the above formulae in terms of the weights m = w 2 of W and in terms of j = r 2 : Ev m = 1 F v m = 1 2j2j + 2 2m2m + 2 v m+1 = jj + 1 mm + 1 v m+1 2j2j + 2 2m2m 2 v m 1 = jj + 1 mm 1 v m 1 W v m = imv m where we now index the vectors using m note v m v 2m = v w, so that the representation is in the space and is of degree 2j + 1. V = v j, v j 1,..., v j

2.1 Alternative methods Note that SU2 is isomorphic to the three-sphere S 3 which is simply connected, and hence the representations of SU2 and su2 are in fact in one-to-one correspondence. The representations of SU2 are the representations in the space V j of homogeneous polynomials in z, w C of degree 2j induced by the natural action of SU2 on z w t C 2. This result can be established by restricting to the subgroup of diagonal matrices in SU2 which is isomorphic to U1, and showing that V j splits as a sum of simple U1 modules but not as a sum of simple SU2 modules. As a second alternative, we have that the Lie algebras of SU2 and SL2, R have the same complexification and so the same representations. The group SL2, R is the group of two-by-two real matrices with unit determinant and its Lie algebra consists of traceless two-by-two matrices. As a basis we have H = 1 0 0 1 E = 0 1 0 0 F = 0 0 1 0 and these satisfy [H, E] = 2E, [H, F ] = 2F, [E, F ] = H and so can be used to construct the representations of sl2, R and hence su2 exactly as we did using su2. To see that su2 and sl2, R have the same complexification we note that the complexification of each is the set of all traceless complex two-by-two matrices. 3 In quantum mechanics In quantum mechanics we are concerned with the generators of infinitesimal rotations, J x, J y, J z, which satisfy [J l, J m ] = iε lmn J n with = 1. An important difference between these generators and the basis for su2 used above is that the J i are hermitian rather than skew-hermitian, hence so that we have the raising and lowering operators J x iv J y iu J z iw J + = J x + ij y = E J = J x ij y = F while also J z = H 2 The total angular momentum operator J 2 = J 2 x + J 2 y + J 2 z has eigenvalues jj + 1 while J z has eigenvalues m. A procedure somewhat similar to the one above using the raising and lowering operators tells us that m runs from j to j and can be integral or half-integral, and so the space of a given angular momentum j is 2j + 1-dimensional. Our basis elements are written using Dirac notation as jm v m, and are normalised so that J + jm = jj + 1 mm + 1 j, m + 1 J jm = jj + 1 mm 1 j, m 1 5