The Use of Mycorrhizae in Mined Land Reclamation

Similar documents
Treat the Cause not the symptom

Working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture

POTENTIAL FOR USING MYCORRHIZAL PLANTS TO REVE.GETATE TEXAS HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAYS

Comparison of two main mycorrhizal types

Chapter 37: Plant Nutrition - A Nutritional Network

Plant Nutrition and Transport. Chapter 29

Why Should You Consider Using Mycorrhizae? Northeast Greenhouse Conference 2018 Mycorrhizal Applications LLC 1

Effect of host plant, cultivation media and inoculants sources on propagation of mycorrhizal fungus Glomus Mossae

for GREENHOUSES GREENHOUSE Why are Mycorrhizae Important? Benefit to Plants

ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION

Unit D: Controlling Pests and Diseases in the Orchard. Lesson 5: Identify and Control Diseases in the Orchard

Mycorrhizae. in the Alaska Landscape. What are Mycorrhizae? Mycorrhizae in the Annual Garden HGA-00026

How Mycorrhizae Can Improve Plant Quality

Inoculation and Colonization of Four Saltmarsh Species with Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (Mississippi)

NURSERY GREENHOUSE FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION

Mycorrhiza Fungus + Plant Host (Root)

If you are searched for a book by Gisela Cuenca;Alicia Caceres;Giovanny Oirdobro;Zamira Hasmy;Carlos Urdaneta Arbuscular mycorrhizae as an

Fundamentals of Small- Scale Mushroom Production

Fundamentals of Small- Scale Mushroom Production

Mycorrhizae. in the Alaska Landscape

GERMINATION OF BASIDIOSPORES OF MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN THE RHIZOSPHERE OF PINUS RADIATA D. DON

Symbiotic Fungal Endophytes that Confer Tolerance for Plant Growth in Saline and Dry Soils Zakia Boubakir, Elizabeth Cronin, Susan Kaminskyj

Absorption of Mineral Salts by Higher Plant

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF. Brenda Joan Biermann for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy INOCULATION OF CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS WITH VESICULAR-

Gnzman-Plazola. R.A.. R. Ferrera-Cerrato and JJX Etchevers. Centro de Edafologia, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico.

Phenanthrene and pyrene uptake by arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi ( ) Buy online at

Assessment Schedule 2016 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of biological ideas relating to micro-organisms (90927)

Plant Function. KEB no office hour on Monday 23 March. Chs 38, 39 (parts), March 2009 ECOL 182R UofA K. E. Bonine

Soil and Plant Nutrition

Mycorrhiza Fungus + Plant Host (Root)

Study of Mycorrhizal Alliance with Plants under Stressful Condition of Overburden... 7 Opencast Mines, Jharia. This mine spoil was freshly dumped beca

COMPONENTS OF VA MYCORRHIZAL INOCULUM AND THEIR EFFECTS ON GROWTH OF ONION

Nature and Science, 2009;7(6), ISSN ,

QUANTIFYING VESICULAR-ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAE: A PROPOSED METHOD TOWARDS STANDARDIZATION*

ROLE OF MYCORRHIZAE IN FORESTATION OF SURFACE MINES' Donald H. Marx 2

EFFECT OF INOCULATION WITH VAM-FUNGI AND BRADYRHIZOBIUM ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN IN SINDH

Factors Affecting the Infection of Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Transformed Root Culture

The Role of Mycorrhizal Fungi in Regenerating Healthy Soils and Agricultural Productivity: Walter Jehne and Phil Lee

Unit G: Pest Management. Lesson 2: Managing Crop Diseases

Importance of Mycorrhizae for Agricultural Crops 1

Influence of Ectomycorrhiza on Nutrient Absorption of Pinus massoniana Seedlings Under Water Stress

Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal associations of sesamum

Interactions Between Microorganisms and Higher Plants from Competition to Symbiosis p. 184

Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plaat Sci.), Vol. 95, No. 1, August 1985, pp Printed in India. K PARVATHI, K VENKATESWARLU and A S RAO

Mycorrhizas And Tropical Soil Fertility [An Article From: Agriculture, Ecosystems And Environment] [HTML] [Digital] By I.M. Cardoso;T.W.

Department of Agriculture, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran. Corresponding author: Hamidreza Mobasser

Keywords: Agroforestry, mycorrhiza, resin, Shorea javanica, Sumatra

Influence of Soils and Fertility on Activity and Survival of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal. Fungi

Plant Function Chs 38, 39 (parts), 40

MYCORRHIZAL COLONIZATION AS IMPACTED BY CORN HYBRID

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Mycorrhizal inoculation of grapevine rootstocks suitable for mediterranean soils: evaluation of their growth response

MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AS BIOFERTILIZER FOR FRUIT TREE PRODUCTION IN THAILAND. Supaporn Thamsurakul 1 and Sompetch Charoensook 2

EFFECTS OF NUTRIENT LEVELS ON THE COLONIZATION OF POA SECUNDA BY ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AND DARK SEPTATE ENDOPHYTES

EFFECTS OF DROUGHT STRESS ON GROWTH RESPONSE IN CORN, SUDAN GRASS, AND BIG BLUESTEM TO GLOMUS ETUNICA TUM*

Pepper cultivation on a substrate consisting of soil, natural zeolite and olive mill waste sludge-changes in soil properties

Workshop on Role of Mycorrhiza in Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry

Effect Of Inoculation Of Vam Fungi On Enhancement Of Biomass And Yield In Okra. Maruti S. Darade

Altitude: m GPS: N W Area under coffee: 0.5 ha/farmer

Lab 6A: Microscopic Assessment of Mycorrhiza - Part 1

Influence of Mycorrhizal Source and Seeding Methods on Native Grass Species Grown in Soils from a Disturbed Site

Succession. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview. 4.3 Succession

Describe how ecosystems recover from a disturbance. Compare succession after a natural disturbance with succession after a human-caused disturbance.


When do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi protect plant roots from pathogens?

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. FUNGI

LIFE HISTORY STRATEGIES

Associations between an invasive plant (Taeniatherum caputmedusae, Medusahead) and soil microbial communities

AGR1006. Assessment of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculants for Pulse Crop Production Systems

The Diversity of Living Things

Soil ecology. KEN KILLHAM Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Aberdeen CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. with electron micrographs by

Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants

Training Workshop on Advanced Techniques in Mycorrhizal Research February TERI Gram, Gual Pahiri, Gurgaon, Haryana.

INTERACTION BETWEEN A VESICULAR-ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA AND RHIZOBIUM AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SOYBEAN IN THE FIELD

EFFECT OF ENDOGONE MYCORRHIZA ON PLANT GROWTH

Development of the VAM fungus, Glomus mosseae in groundnut in static solution culture

Plant Growth & Development. Growth Processes Photosynthesis. Plant Growth & Development

Wantira Ranabuht Department of Botany, Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University

Growth responses of Acacia angustissima to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal. inoculation. Abstract

Mycorrhizal Fungi. Symbiotic relationship with plants -- form sheath around fine roots and extend hyphae into soil and sometimes into root cells

Nutritional Adaptations of Plants *

EFFECT OF GLOMUS MOSSEAE ON GROWTH AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF CAJANUS CAJAN (VAR. ICPL-87)

Improved aeroponic culture technique for production of inocula of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Soil Microbiology. Ambarish Bhuyan Assistant Professor Botany Department MDKG College, Dibrugarh

Lidia Sas Paszt The Rhizosphere Laboratory, Research Institute of Horticulture, Skierniewice, Poland,

Plant disease. Plant Diseases: Learning objectives: Plant Disease: Any physiological or structural abnormality that is harmful to the plant

Regeneration of Cold Desert Pine of N.W. Himalayas (India) A Preliminary Study

Cryotherapy: A New Method to Eliminate Pathogens from Sweetpotato Propagation Materials

Fungi are absorptive heterotrophs that secrete digestive enzymes and are major decomposers of dead organic material

Influence of Aphelenchus avenae on Vesicular-arbuscular Endomycorrhizal Growth Response in Cotton

FINAL REPORT for 2008 Project Status: Results:

Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology Weathering and Soil

Soil Biology. Chapter 10

BIOLOGY. Plant Nutrition CAMPBELL. Reece Urry Cain Wasserman Minorsky Jackson 37. Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick

Chapter 4 AND 5 Practice

KR bluestem: Restoration to native grasses and forbs. David L. Davidson

Secretion of organic acids from root

Chapter 10: Soil Organisms

YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY (WUE) OF CENCHRUS CILIARIS AS INFLUENCED BY VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAE (VAM)

Ecological Succession

Transcription:

The Use of Mycorrhizae in Mined Land Reclamation Susan Sturges Mined land sites are generally known to be nutrient poor and contain soils that are in dire need of stabilization to prevent erosion. Marked by the beginning works of J. R. Schramm, mine reclamation practices have included the use of mycorrhizal inocula to establish successful plant communities on mined sites (Danielson 1985). Mycorrhizae benefit the vegetation by increasing a plant s ability to survive in a nutrient poor and water deficient environment (Norland 1993). In undisturbed ecosystems, mycorrhizal relationships occur naturally. Mined sites, however, are chemically, physically, and biologically altered and often lack the necessary quantity of mycorrhizal fungi to sustain a tolerant plant community (Norland 1993). Several types of mycorrhizal inocula are currently in use and will be examined according to their practicality and economy to site specificity. Benefits of mycorrhizae on mined land sites Five types of mycorrhizae are recognized ectomycorrhizae (ECM), vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM), and three others that are species restricted (Ericoid, Orchid, and ectendomycorrhizae) (Norland 1993). ECM are common to woody plants and characterized by a sheath of hyphae that surround the plant root. VAM penetrates the cell walls of the plant and forms arbuscules (used for nutrient transfer) and vesicles (recognized as sites of lipid storage) within the roots. VAM is host obligate, while ectomycorrhizae can exist without a plant host, but needs one to complete its life cycle. Both ECM and VAM can be found on mined sites, but VAM species have been found to colonize mine wastes more than ECM (Danielson 1985). Dissemination can occur in several ways. Spores can remain ungerminated for an extensive period of time during unfavorable conditions. They can be transferred via water drainage, wind, and redeposited by animals after consumption. The spores of mycorrhizal fungi have been shown to survive the digestive processes of small animals and insects and still germinate (Ponder 1980). Also, infection does seem to occur more rapidly through the spread of an infected root to an uninfected root than by spore germination (Rives 1980). Mined lands are usually deficient in natural plant cover and lack the necessary mycorrhizae to establish a root system to stabilize the soil, maintain moisture, and obtain nutrients (Helm and Carling 1990). The top soil is usually removed during mining which eliminates natural inoculation on the site(rives et al. 1980). Mining also affects many soil factors, such as ph, fertility, toxicity, bulk density, and soil moisture, which, in turn, reduce the VAM propagules in the soil that would be necessary for mycorrhizal dependent plants to thrive (Fuge 1986). Mycorrhizal fungi act as providers and protectors for plants. For example, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are deficient in mine soils and tailings and can be increased in plant intake by mycorrhizae (Norland 1993). Other essential nutrients such as calcium, magnesium, sulfur, iron, zinc, aluminum, and sodium have shown increases in plant intake with mycorrhizal fungi (Daft and Hacskaylo 1976). Higher concentrations of metals which can be harmful to plants (such as 1

aluminum, arsenic, barium, boron, cadmium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, and zinc), can exist on mined sites and, at the same time, be filtered to tolerable amounts by the fungi for the plant (Norland 1993). Increasing plant hormones and acting as a barrier to plant pathogens are other benefits to the plant provided by mycorrhizae (Fuge 1986). Mycorrhizae can also alleviate the stress of higher surface temperatures and acidity that mined sites may have (Danielson 1985). Not only can mycorrhizae improve plant growth, but provide some resistance to drought and salinity as well (Duvert et al. 1990). Mycorrhizal inoculation techniques Several factors should be considered before applying any type of inoculum. First, effectiveness of inoculation form is usually dependent on fungi species, climate, and ecosystem (Abbott and Robson 1981). Second, a particular fungus may not necessarily do as well with a host in different environmental conditions or with the same host under varied environmental conditions (Abbott and Robson 1981). Also, inocula, in general, will be most successful when applied in the root zone of actively growing plants without heavy fertilization (Norland 1993). Inoculum sources should be given strong considerations. Inocula from old mine spoils with established vegetation and from neighboring undisturbed sites are valuable sources (Danielson 1985, Helm and Carling 1990). Finally, with all types of inoculum, there are practical difficulties of storage, reactivation and applications on a large scale (Mosse et al. 1981). Mycorrhizal inoculum comes in four forms for application infested soil, infected plant roots, pure cultures of fungi, and spores (Mosse et al. 1981). The earliest attempts to introduce mycorrhizal fungi was with infested soil (Mosse et al. 1981). Soil inoculum is the most widely used natural inoculum (Marx and Kenny 1982). Peat, sludge, stockpiled soil, and soil from neighboring sites are all sources for soil inoculum (Norland 1993). An advantage of using soil inoculum is that it could contain nitrogen fixing bacteria. Also, soil inoculum consists of spores, roots and hyphae that all may be able to inoculate seedlings (Helm and Carling 1990). Application and collection of soil inoculum is easier than other types (Helm and Carling 1990). Disadvantages are that the species within the soil cannot be controlled, there is no guarantee the desired fungi are contained in the soil, and the actual transportation of large loads of soil is difficult and costly (Marx and Kenny 1982). The first successful use of root pieces to inoculate seedlings was in 1958 by Peuss, Winter and Meloh (Biermann 1983). Root pieces tend to be lighter than blended pot culture material, colonize more rapidly than spores, and contain intraradical vesicles that have been found to be viable after two years of cold storage in pot cultures (Biermann 1983). Disadvantages of root pieces include an increased potential of introduced pathogens and varied infectivity (Biermann 1983). Pathogens can be reduced if proper sanitation is practiced and a surface sterilant is applied to destroy some of the organisms. Care should be taken in the application of the sterilant since large amounts may kill the fungus (Biermann 1983). Spores as inoculum date back to the eighteenth century (Marx and Kenny 1982). Spores do not require an extended growth phase and are lightweight (Norland 1993). Also, spores can be collected and stored for years(marx and Kenny 1982). Although spores can be viable for an extended amount of time, there is no standard laboratory test to determine spore viability 2

(Norland 1993). It may also take 3 to 4 weeks longer than vegetative inoculum to germinate and infect a root. Other disadvantages include a possible insufficient availability of sporophores every year and lack of genetic definition of the spores(norland 1993). The most biologically sound inoculum is vegetative (Marx and Kenny 1982). The fungus should be able to grow in pure culture and withstand manipulation (Norland 1993). A commercial formulation of mycelial inoculum has been produced called MycoRhiz (Pisolithus tinctorius) (Marx and Kenny 1982). The most successful results of MycoRhiz showed when an abundance of hyphae, a ph between 4.5 and 6.0, low levels of bacterial and fungal contaminants, and low amounts of residual glucose (Marx and Kenny 1982). ECM are, unfortunately, difficult to grow in the laboratory and large amounts of inoculum for large scale application are scarce (Marx and Kenny 1982). Several techniques are available to apply inocula. Two common techniques are broadcasting inoculation at the soil surface and banding inoculum at the root zone (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Broadcasting has been used for soil, spore, and vegetative inoculum (Norland 1993). Broadcasting consists of spreading a known amount of inoculum over an area of soil surface and then mixing the inoculum into the soil to a depth of 10 to 20 cm. before seeding (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Large amounts of inoculum are also needed for broadcasting to ensure complete coverage of seedbeds (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Banding inoculation, on the other hand, requires only a third of the amount of inoculum as broadcasting since the inoculum is placed in a band in a concentrated area near developing roots (Norland 1993). Side-dressing of the inoculum is also effective with seedlings or seeds (Norland 1993). When using container seedlings, banding inoculum is more effective than the broadcasting technique (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Banding inoculation has been shown more effective than seed pelleting (Menge and Timmer 1982). Most types of inoculum can be applied with banding inoculation. Banding is time and labor saving compare to other techniques, but does require the use of a machine applicator (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Slurries and seed pelleting are additional techniques that are successful with the use of spore inoculum (Marx and Kenny 1982). Slurries are a mixture of water, a carrier and the inoculum which roots are dipped into prior to planting (Norland 1993). Seed pelleting consists of coating seeds with spores or soil inoculum (Norland 1993). Nonseed granules are also available for VAM and are advantageous since they can be stored for several months, and can be used in conjunction with machine drilling (Norland 1993). Inoculum viability, however, is affected by granulation (Norland 1993). Two other techniques are basidiospore inoculation and mycorrhizal seedlings (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Basidiospore inoculation and VAM spore inoculation can be accomplished by mixing spores in water and leaching them into soil or mixing dry spores into the soil (Norland 1993). More information is needed on application methods, concentrations of spores, and transport and storage of spores, but the techniques have been found to be advantageous (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Mycorrhizal seedlings have been used to infect other plant roots. The mycelia from these transplanted seedlings spread to desired plant roots (Riffle and Maronek 1982). Roots with abundant mycorrhizae should be selected and incorporated while fresh (Norland 1993). 3

Discussion The use of mycorrhizal propagules have been proposed as a cost efficient long term technique to establish vegetation on mined land (Fuge 1986). Past revegetation efforts have used seed, typically grass and legumes, or transplants of woody species plus fertilization and irrigation (Helm and Carling 1990). Repeated application of fertilizer is expensive and may not reestablish plant communities that are self-sustaining (Helm and Carling 1990). Sludge is an inexpensive source of nitrogen and phosphorus used in mine reclamation, but has been shown to often add heavy concentrations of metals that reduces plant growth and affects VAM productivity (Fuge 1986). Use of local topsoil as a mycorrhizal inoculum improved the growth of balsam poplar and alder on an abandoned coal mine site in Palmer, Alaska (Helm and Carling 1990). Mycorrhizal inoculum used in conjunction with other techniques could improve reclamation success. Duel infections of bacteruim and a mycorrhizal fungus resulted in increased vegetative success in coal wastes sites in Pennsylvania (Daft and Hacskaylo 1976). Mycorrhizae are an essential piece to reclamation success on mined lands. Resources, site and host specificity, environmental conditions and time commitment need to be evaluated to determine which inoculum and technique would be best suited for possible applications. Literature cited Abbot, L. and A. Robson. 1981. Infectivity and effectiveness of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: effect of inoculum type. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 32: 631 639. Biermann, B. and R. Linderman. 1983. Use of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal roots, intraradical vesicles and extraradical vesicles as inoculum. New Phytologist. 95: 97 105. Daft, M. and E. Hacskaylo. 1976. Arbuscular mycorrhizas in the anthracite and bituminous coal wastes of Pennsylvania. Journal of Applied Ecology. 13: 523 531. Danielson, R. 1985. Mycorrhizae and reclamation of stressed terrestrial environments. Ch. In soil reclamation processes. Ed. by Tate, R. III. and A. Klein. Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 173 201. Duvert, P., R. Perrin, and C. Plenchette. 1990. Soil receptiveness to VA mycorrhizal association: concept and method. Plant and soil. 124: 1 6. Fuge, E. 1986. An assessment of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on lead/zinc mine tailings. Thesis. University of Minnesota. Helm, D. and D. Carling. 1990. Use of on-site mycorrhizal inoculum for plant establishment on abandoned mined lands. Bureau of Mines contract report. Palmer, Alaska. Marx, D. and D. Kenny. 1982. Production of ectomycorrhizal fungus inoculum. Ch. in methods and principles of mycorrhizal research. The American phytopathological society. pp. 131--146. 4

Menge, J. and L. Timmer. 1982. Procedures for inoculation of plants with vesicular- arbuscular mycorrhizae in the laboratory, greenhouse and field. Ch. in methods and principles of mycorrhizal research. The American phytopathological society. pp. 59 68. Mosse, B. et al. 1981. Ecology of mycorrhizae and mycorrhizal fungi. Advances in microbial ecology. 5: 137 210. Norland, M. 1993. Soil factors affecting mycorrhizal use in surface mine reclamation. Bureau of mines information circular. United States Department of the Interior. Ponder, F. Jr. 1980. Rabbits and grasshoppers: vectors of endomycorrhizal fungi on new coal mine spoil. Research note NC-250. North central forest experiment station. U.S.D.A. Riffle, J. and D. Maronek. 1982. Ectomycorrhizal inoculation procedures for greenhouse and nursery studies. Ch. in methods and principles of mycorrhizal research. The American phytopathological society. pp. 147 156. Rives, C., M. Bajwa, and A. Liberta. 1980. Effects of topsoil storage during surface mining on the viability of VA mycorrhiza. Soil science. 129: 253 257. 5