LECTURE 380 TWO-STAGE OPEN-LOOP COMPARATORS - II (READING: AH ) Trip Point of an Inverter

Similar documents
Lecture 310 Open-Loop Comparators (3/28/10) Page 310-1

V in (min) and V in (min) = (V OH -V OL ) dv out (0) dt = A p 1 V in = = 10 6 = 1V/µs

ECE 6412, Spring Final Exam Page 1

ECE 438: Digital Integrated Circuits Assignment #4 Solution The Inverter

Errata of CMOS Analog Circuit Design 2 nd Edition By Phillip E. Allen and Douglas R. Holberg

ECE 6412, Spring Final Exam Page 1 FINAL EXAMINATION NAME SCORE /120

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. Lecture 35 CMOS Delay Model

Lecture 37: Frequency response. Context

Errata of CMOS Analog Circuit Design 2 nd Edition By Phillip E. Allen and Douglas R. Holberg

3. Basic building blocks. Analog Design for CMOS VLSI Systems Franco Maloberti

ECE 342 Solid State Devices & Circuits 4. CMOS

Lecture 050 Followers (1/11/04) Page ECE Analog Integrated Circuits and Systems II P.E. Allen

DC and Transient Responses (i.e. delay) (some comments on power too!)

EEE 421 VLSI Circuits

Lecture 140 Simple Op Amps (2/11/02) Page 140-1

Lecture 150 Simple BJT Op Amps (1/28/04) Page 150-1

EE 434 Lecture 33. Logic Design

Systematic Design of Operational Amplifiers

Lecture 13 MOSFET as an amplifier with an introduction to MOSFET small-signal model and small-signal schematics. Lena Peterson

CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits. Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view)

Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response

ECE 415/515 ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN

Lecture 12 Digital Circuits (II) MOS INVERTER CIRCUITS

MOS Transistor Theory

Lecture 320 Improved Open-Loop Comparators and Latches (3/28/10) Page 320-1

P. R. Nelson 1 ECE418 - VLSI. Midterm Exam. Solutions

Step 1. Finding V M. Goal: Þnd V M = input voltage for the output = V M both transistors are saturated at V IN = V M since

ECE 546 Lecture 10 MOS Transistors

High-to-Low Propagation Delay t PHL

MOSFET and CMOS Gate. Copy Right by Wentai Liu

Today s lecture. EE141- Spring 2003 Lecture 4. Design Rules CMOS Inverter MOS Transistor Model

EE5780 Advanced VLSI CAD

CMOS Inverter (static view)

ECE321 Electronics I

Biasing the CE Amplifier

EE105 Fall 2014 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. NMOS Transistor Capacitances: Saturation Region

EECS 105: FALL 06 FINAL

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. 3. MOS Transistors

University of Toronto. Final Exam

ECE-343 Test 2: Mar 21, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

EECS 141: FALL 05 MIDTERM 1

Properties of CMOS Gates Snapshot

THE INVERTER. Inverter

ENGR890 Digital VLSI Design Fall Lecture 4: CMOS Inverter (static view)

PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR CMOS ANALOG CIRCUIT DESIGN, 2 ND EDITION

Lecture 6: DC & Transient Response

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. Lecture 6 MOS Transistors

EE 330 Lecture 37. Digital Circuits. Other Logic Families. Propagation Delay basic characterization Device Sizing (Inverter and multiple-input gates)

CMOS INVERTER. Last Lecture. Metrics for qualifying digital circuits. »Cost» Reliability» Speed (delay)»performance

Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response

The CMOS Inverter: A First Glance

6.2 INTRODUCTION TO OP AMPS

EEC 118 Lecture #5: CMOS Inverter AC Characteristics. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation

Lecture 11 VTCs and Delay. No lab today, Mon., Tues. Labs restart next week. Midterm #1 Tues. Oct. 7 th, 6:30-8:00pm in 105 Northgate

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

CHAPTER 6 CMOS OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIERS

DC and Transient. Courtesy of Dr. Daehyun Dr. Dr. Shmuel and Dr.

Homework Assignment 08

OptiMOS 2 Power-Transistor

2007 Fall: Electronic Circuits 2 CHAPTER 10. Deog-Kyoon Jeong School of Electrical Engineering

Lecture 4: DC & Transient Response

OptiMOS Small-Signal-Transistor

OptiMOS -P Small-Signal-Transistor

Final Exam. 55:041 Electronic Circuits. The University of Iowa. Fall 2013.

Practice 3: Semiconductors

Digital Integrated Circuits

EE115C Winter 2017 Digital Electronic Circuits. Lecture 3: MOS RC Model, CMOS Manufacturing

ECE-343 Test 1: Feb 10, :00-8:00pm, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

ECE-342 Test 3: Nov 30, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : Solution

OptiMOS TM 3 Power-Transistor

EEC 116 Lecture #3: CMOS Inverters MOS Scaling. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation

P-Channel Enhancement Mode Field Effect Transistor PARAMETERS/TEST CONDITIONS SYMBOL LIMITS UNITS

SIPMOS Small-Signal-Transistor

Homework Assignment 09

500V N-Channel MOSFET

DC & Transient Responses

OptiMOS 2 Power-Transistor

NTE4501 Integrated Circuit CMOS, Dual 4 Input NAND Gate, 2 Input NOR/OR Gate, 8 Input AND/NAND Gate

OptiMOS 2 Small-Signal-Transistor

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

N- & P-Channel Enhancement Mode Field Effect Transistor

OptiMOS P2 Small-Signal-Transistor

OptiMOS Power-Transistor

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

OptiMOS 2 Small-Signal-Transistor

EE115C Digital Electronic Circuits Homework #4

OptiMOS 3 Power-Transistor

MOS Transistor Theory

5.0 CMOS Inverter. W.Kucewicz VLSICirciuit Design 1

OptiMOS 3 Power-MOSFET

OptiMOS Power-Transistor

The Physical Structure (NMOS)

OptiMOS 2 Power-Transistor

CHAPTER 15 CMOS DIGITAL LOGIC CIRCUITS

Lecture 5 Review Current Source Active Load Modified Large / Small Signal Models Channel Length Modulation

The transistor is not in the cutoff region. the transistor is in the saturation region. To see this, recognize that in a long-channel transistor ifv

SIPMOS Small-Signal-Transistor

OptiMOS TM Power-MOSFET

IXTH80N65X2 V DSS. X2-Class Power MOSFET = 650V I D25. = 80A 38m. R DS(on) N-Channel Enhancement Mode Avalanche Rated TO-247 G D S

OptiMOS TM 3 Power-Transistor

Transcription:

Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-1 LECTURE 380 TWO-STAGE OPEN-LOOP COMPARATORS - II (READING: AH 445-461) Trip Point of an Inverter V DD In order to determine the propagation delay time, it is necessary to know when the second stage of the two-stage + M6 comparator begins to turn on. v in i - 6 v Second stage: out Trip point: Assume that M6 and are saturated. (We know that the steepest slope occurs for this condition.) Equate i 6 to i 7 and solve for v in which becomes the trip point. K N (W 7 /L 7 ) v in V TRP V DD - V TP - K P (W 6 /L 6 ) (V Bias- V SS -V TN ) Example: If W 7 /L 7 W 6 /L 6, V DD 2.5V, V SS -2.5V, and V Bias 0V the trip point for the circuit above is V TRP 2.5-0.7-110/50 (0 +2.5-0.7) -0.870V V Bias V SS i 7 Fig. 8.2-4 Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-2 Propagation Delay Time of a Slewing, Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator Previously we calculated the propagation delay time for a nonslewing comparator. If the comparator slews, then the propagation delay time is found from dv i i i C i dt i C v i i t i where C i is the capacitance to ground at the output of the i-th stage The propagation delay time of the i-th stage is, V i t i t i C i I i The propagation delay time is found by summing the delays of each stage. t p t 1 + t 2 + t 3 +

Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-3 Example 2-5 - Propagation Time Delay of a Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator For the two-stage comparator shown V DD 2.5V assume that C I 0.2pF and C II 5pF. M3 M4 M6 Also, assume that v G1 0V and that v G2 has the waveform shown. If the input v o1 voltage is large enough to cause slew to dominate, find the propagation time delay 30µA M1 M2 C I v G1 3µm 3µm 0.2pF of the rising and falling output of the comparator and give the propagation time delay of the comparator. v G2 234µA 2.5V 0V -2.5V v G2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 t(µs) Fig. 8.2-5 Solution 1.) Total delay sum of the first and second stage delays, t 1 and t 2 2.) First, consider the change of v G2 from -2.5V to 2.5V at 0.2µs. The last row of Table 8.2-1 gives v o1 +2.5V and v out -2.5V 3.) t f1, requires C I, V o1, and I 5. C I 0.2pF, I 5 30µA and V 1 can be calculated by finding the trip point of the output stage/ M8 M5 30µA V SS -2.5V 38µm v out 35µm C II 5pF Fig. 8.2-5A Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-4 Example 2-5 - Continued 4.) The trip point of the output stage by setting the current of M6 when saturated equal to 234µA. β 6 2 (V SG6 - V TP ) 2 234 2 234µA V SG6 0.7 + 110 38 1.035V Therefore, the trip point of the second stage is V TRP2 2.5-1.035 1.465V Therefore, V 1 2.5V - 1.465V V SG6 1.035V. Thus the falling propagation time delay of the first stage is 1.035V t fo1 0.2pF 30µA 6.9ns 5.) The rising propagation time delay of the second stage requires C II, V out, and I 6. C II is given as 5pF, V out 2.5V (assuming the trip point of the circuit connected to the output of the comparator is 0V), and I 6 can be found as follows: V G6 (guess) 0.5[V G6 (I 6 234µA) + V G6 (min)] 2 15 V G6 (min) V G1 - V GS1 (I SS /2) + V DS2 -V GS1 (I SS /2) -0.7-110 3-1.00V V G6 (guess) 0.5(1.465V-1.00V) 0.232V Therefore V SG6 2.27V and I 6 β 6 2 (V SG6 - V TP ) 2 38 50 2 (2.27-0.7)2 2,342µA

Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-5 Example 2-5 - Continued 6.) The rising propagation time delay for the output can expressed as 2.5V t rout 5pF 2,342µA-234µA 5.93ns Thus the total propagation time delay of the rising output of the comparator is approximately 12.8ns and most of this delay is attributable to the first stage. 7.) Next consider the change of v G2 from 2.5V to -2.5V which occurs at 0.4µs. We shall assume that v G2 has been at 2.5V long enough for the conditions of Table 8.2-1 to be valid. Therefore, v o1 V SS -2.5V and v out V DD. The propagation time delays for the first and second stages are calculated as 3V 1.465V-(-1.13V) v out t ro1 0.2pF 30µA 17.3ns 2V 2.5V t fout 5pF 234µA 53.42ns 8.) The total propagation time delay of the falling output is 70.72ns. Taking the average of the rising and falling propagation time delays gives a propagation time delay for this two-stage, open-loop comparator of about 41.76ns. 1V 0V -1V -2V V TRP6 1.465V v o1 Falling prop. delay time Rising prop. delay time -3V 200ns 300ns 400ns 500ns 600ns Time Fig. 8.2-6 Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-6 Design of a Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator Table 8.2-2 Design of the Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator of Fig. 8.2-3 for a Linear Response. Specifications: t p, C II,V in (min), V OH, V OL, V icm +, Vicm -, and overdrive Constraints: Technology, VDD and V SS Step Design Relationships Comments 1 p I p II 1 t p mk, and I 7 I 6 p II C II λ N +λ P Choose m 1 2 W 6 2 I 6 L 6 K P (V SD6 (sat)) 2 and W 7 L7 2 I 7 K N (V DS7 (sat)) 2 V SD6 (sat) V DD -V OH V DS7 (sat) V OL - V SS 3 2C I A result of choosing m 1. Guess C I as 0.1pF to 0.5pF I 5 I 7 C II Will check C I later 4 W 3 L W 4 I 5 V 3 L SG3 V DD -V + icm +VTN 4 K P (V SG3 - V TP ) 2 5 A v (0)(g ds2 +g ds4 )(g ds6 +g ds7 ) W 1 W 2 g m1 2 g m1 g m6 L 1 L g 2 K N I m6 5 6 Find C I and check assumption C I C gd2 +C gd4 +C gs6 +C bd2 +C bd4 7 W V DS5 (sat) V - 5 icm -VGS1 -V SS L 5 2K P W 6 I 6 L 6 A v (0) V OH +V OL V in (min) If C I is greater than the guess in step 3, then increase C I and repeat steps 4 through 6 2 I 5 If V DS5 (sat) is less than 100mV, increase W 1 /L 1. K N (V DS5 (sat)) 2

Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-7 Example 2-6 - Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator Design for a Linear Response. Assume the specifications of the V DD comparator shown are given below. t p 50ns V OH 2V V OL -2V i3 i 4 V DD 2.5V V SS -2.5V C II 5pF M3 M4 v o1 V in (min) 1mV V icm + 2V V icm - -1.25V Also assume that the overdrive will be a factor of 10. Use this architecture to achieve the above specifications and assume that all I SS + channel lengths are to be. VBias Solution - Following the procedure outlined in Table 8.2-2, we choose m 1 to get 10 p I p II 9 50 10 6.32x106 rads/sec This gives I 6 I 7 6.32x10 6 5x10-12 0.04+0.05 351µA I 6 I 7 400µA Therefore, W 6 L 6 2 400 (0.5) 2 50 64 andw 7 L 7 v G1 M1 M2 2 400 (0.5) 2 110 29 i 1 i 2 C I M5 V SS v G2 M6 C II v out Fig. 8.2-3 Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-8 Example 2-6 - Continued Next, we guess C I 0.2pF. This gives I 5 32µA and we will increase it to 40µA for a margin of safety. Step 4 gives V SG3 as 1.2V which results in W 3 W 4 40 50(1.2-0.7)2 3.2 W 3 W 4 4 The desired gain is found to be 4000 which gives an input transconductance of g m1 4000 0.09 20 44.44 162µS This gives the W/L ratios of M1 and M2 as W 1 L W 2 1 L (162) 2 2 110 40 5.96 W 1 L W 2 1 L 6 2 To check the guess for C I we need to calculate it which is done as C I C gd2 +C gd4 +C gs6 +C bd2 +C bd4 0.9fF+1.3fF+119.5fF+20.4fF+36.8fF 178.9fF which is less than what was guessed so we will make no changes.

Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-9 Example 2-6 - Continued Finally, the W/L value of M5 is found by finding V GS1 as 0.946V which gives V DS5 (sat) 0.304V. This gives W 5 2 40 L 5 (0.304) 2 110 7.87 8 Obviously, M5 and cannot be connected gate-gate and source-source. The value of I 5 and I 7 must be derived separately as illustrated below. The W values are summarized below assuming that all channel lengths are. W 1 W 2 6µm W 3 W 4 4µm W 5 8µm W 6 64µm W 7 29µm V DD 2/1 10µA M8 2/1 M9 M10 10µA M5 2/1 8/1 M11 40µA 40µA M12 8/1 3/1 400µA 29/1 V SS Fig. 8.2-7 Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-10 Design of a Two-Stage Comparator for a Slewing Response Table 8.2-3 Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator Design for a Slewing Response. Specifications: t p, C II,V in (min), V OH, V OL, V icm +, Vicm - Constraints: Technology, V DD and V SS Step Design Relationships Comments 1 II dv out I 7 I 6 C dt C II (V OH -V OL ) Assume the trip point of the output is (V OH - t p V OL )/2. 2 W 6 2 I 6 L 6 K P (V SD6 (sat)) 2 and W 7 L7 2 I 7 K N (V DS7 (sat)) 2 V SD6 (sat) V DD -V OH V DS7 (sat) V OL - V SS 3 2C I Typically 0.1pf<C I <0.5pF Guess C I as 0.1pF to 0.5pF I 5 I 7 C II 4 I dv o1 I 5 C dt C I (V OH -V OL ) Assume that v o1 swings between V OH and t p V OL. 5 W 3 L W 4 I 5 V 3 L SG3 V DD -V + icm +VTN 4 K P (V SG3 - V TP ) 2 6 g m1 A v (0)(g ds2 +g ds4 )(g ds6 +g ds7 ) W 1 g m6 L W 2 1 L g m1 2 g 2 K N I m6 5 7 Find C I and check assumption C I C gd2 +C gd4 +C gs6 +C bd2 +C bd4 8 2K P W 6 I 6 L 6 A v (0) V OH +V OL V in (min) If C I is greater than the guess in step 3, increase the value of C I and repeat steps 4 through 6 W V DS5 (sat) V - 5 2 I 5 If V DS5 (sat) is less than 100mV, increase W 1 /L 1. icm -VGS1 -V SS L 5 K N (V DS5 (sat)) 2

Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-11 Example 2-7 - Two-Stage, Open-Loop Comparator Design for a Slewing Response Assume the specifications of Fig. 8.2-3 are given below. t p 50ns V OH 2V V OL -2V V DD 2.5V V SS -2.5V C II 5pF V in (min) 1mV V icm + 2V V icm - -1.25V Design a two-stage, open-loop comparator using the circuit of Fig. 8.2-3 to the above specifications and assume all channel lengths are to be. Solution Following the procedure outlined in Table 8.2-3, we calculate I 6 and I 7 as I 6 I 7 5x10-12 4 50x10-9 400µA Therefore, W 6 2 400 L 6 (0.5) 2 50 64 andw 7 2 400 L 7 (0.5) 29 2 110 Next, we guess C I 0.2pF. This gives I 5 0.2pF(4V) 50ns 16µA I 5 20µA Step 5 gives V SG3 as 1.2V which results in W 3 W 4 20 50(1.2-0.7) 2 1.6 W 3 W 4 2 Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-12 Example 2-7 - Continued The desired gain is found to be 4000 which gives an input transconductance of g m1 4000 0.09 10 44.44 81µS This gives the W/L ratios of M1 and M2 as W 3 L W 4 3 L (81) 2 4 110 40 1.49 W 1 L W 2 1 L 2 2 To check the guess for C I we need to calculate it which done as C I C gd2 +C gd4 +C gs6 +C bd2 +C bd4 0.9fF+0.4fF+119.5fF+20.4fF+15.3fF 156.5fF which is less than what was guessed. Finally, the W/L value of M5 is found by finding V GS1 as 1.00V which gives V DS5 (sat) 0.25V. This gives W 5 2 20 L 5 (0.25)2 110 5.8 6 As in the previous example, M5 and cannot be connected gate-gate and sourcesource and a scheme like that of Example 8.2-6 must be used. The W values are summarized below assuming that all channel lengths are. W 1 W 2 2µm W 3 W 4 4µm W 5 6µm W 6 64µm W 7 29µm

Lecture 380 Two-Stage Open-Loop Comparators-II (4/5/02) Page 380-13 SUMMARY The two-stage, open-loop comparator has two poles which should as large as possible The transient response of a two-stage, open-loop comparator will be limited by either the bandwidth or the slew rate It is important to know the initial states of a two-stage, open-loop comparator when finding the propagation delay time If the comparator is gainbandwidth limited then the poles should be as large as possible for minimum propagation delay time If the comparator is slew rate limited, then the current sinking and sourcing ability should be as large as possible