WIND TUNNEL TESTING GEOTECHNICAL STUDY

Similar documents
Drilled Shaft Foundations in Limestone. Dan Brown, P.E., Ph.D. Dan Brown and Associates

In-class Exercise. Problem: Select load factors for the Strength I and Service I Limit States for the. Loading Diagram for Student Exercise

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

Analysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Static and Seismic Design of Piles for Downdrag. Thursday, October 4, :00-3:30 PM ET

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

UPDATED 04 JUN 12. Memorandum

Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using wframe to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability.

PECivilExam.com. Copyright 2015 Pecivilexam.com all rights reserved- E-Book Geotechnical Depth Exam: 80 problems

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON)

SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION, WAVE PASSAGE EFFECTS AND ASSYMETRY IN NONLINEAR SOIL RESPONSE

EXAMPLE OF PILED FOUNDATIONS

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Geotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No


CHAPTER 8 ANALYSES OF THE LATERAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE


INCREASE IN PILE CAPACITY WITH TIME IN MISSOURI RIVER ALLUVIUM

The Preliminary Study of the Impact of Liquefaction on Water Pipes

ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH

Hyperbolic Soil Bearing Capacity

The Preliminary Study of the Impact of Liquefaction on Water Pipes

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

PILE-SUPPORTED RAFT FOUNDATION SYSTEM

Foundations of High Rise Buildings

Nonlinear pushover analysis for pile foundations

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

Lecture 8: Flexibility Method. Example

Geotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado

City, University of London Institutional Repository

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Transmission Line Design Structures & Foundations TADP 549

IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

Clayey sand (SC)

CPT Guide 5 th Edition. CPT Applications - Deep Foundations. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Dr. Peter K. Robertson Webinar # /2/2013

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

DRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS

S Wang Beca Consultants, Wellington, NZ (formerly University of Auckland, NZ)

Seabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis

Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

UNIT V. The active earth pressure occurs when the wall moves away from the earth and reduces pressure.

Lateral Resistance of Short Rock Sockets in Weak Rock: a Case History. Text word count: 4140 Number of figures and tables: 13

Seismic Design of a Light Rail Transit Bridge with Fault Rupture Crossing

Guidelines on Foundation Loading and Deformation Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading

ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED STRIP FOUNDATION ON SAND REINFORCED WITH GEOGRIDS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOR OF PILE GROUPS IN LIQUEFIED SOILS

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

Module 9 : Foundation on rocks. Content

Geotechnical Modeling Issues

*** ***! " " ) * % )!( & ' % # $. 0 1 %./ +, - 7 : %8% 9 ) 7 / ( * 7 : %8% 9 < ;14. " > /' ;-,=. / ١

Sample Chapter HELICAL ANCHORS IN SAND 6.1 INTRODUCTION

ADVANCED SOIL MECHANICS FINAL EXAM (TAKE HOME):DUE THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 6PM.

NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

Axially Loaded Piles

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

Theory of Shear Strength

Module 4 Lecture 20 Pore water pressure and shear strength - 4 Topics

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

(Refer Slide Time: 02:18)

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

Lateral responses of piles due to excavation-induced soil movements

Foundation Engineering Prof. Mahendra Singh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

EVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY

Copyright. magazine. bearing capacity and modulus of subgrade reaction? Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (Ks)

Soil Mechanics Prof. B.V.S. Viswanathan Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 51 Earth Pressure Theories II

Theory of Shear Strength

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

ANALYSES OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION BASED ON VERTICAL LOAD TESTS OF DISPLACEMENT PILES

Numerical simulation of inclined piles in liquefiable soils

Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method

Single Piles in Lateral Spreads: Field Bending Moment Evaluation

Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

Chapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations

Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation

ESTIMATION OF NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION IN DEEP PILE FOUNDATION USING THE PRACTICAL AND THEORETICALLY APPROACHES

Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12

Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading

Calibration of Resistance Factors for Drilled Shafts for the 2010 FHWA Design Method

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

INDOT/Purdue Pile Driving Method for Estimation of Axial Capacity

Research work in this thesis deals with the effects of lateral loads in the longitudinal

Numerical Analysis of Pile Behavior under Lateral Loads in. Layered Elastic Plastic Soils

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica.

Geotechnical issues in seismic assessments: When do I need a geotechnical specialist?

Attachment D-7: Rebound and Uplift of the Stilling Basin, Deep Soil Mixing Design

FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT McDonald Creek Bridge Replacement Project Clallam County, Washington

AP Calculus AB Chapter 2 Test Review #1

14 Geotechnical Hazards

Transcription:

WIND TUNNEL TESTING Wind tunnel testing was conducted by the Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory (BLWTL) at the University of Western Ontario (UWO) to develop wind load time histories for the chimney. BLWTL tested a physical model of the chimney at a scale of about 1:300 in a wind tunnel with a boundary layer that was correctly scaled for a typical open country environment as seen in Figure 4. This approach is consistent with ACI-307-98 which only considers an open country location. A rigid model of one chimney was designed, constructed and instrumented for pressure measurements at 8 rings of 10 taps each. It was tested in turbulent boundary-layer flow conditions in two general load cases: isolated chimney and interference due to an identical chimney upstream. The pressure data was integrated to provide sectional drag and lift coefficients at each ring for implementation in a nonlinear structural analysis. BLWTL provided drag and lift coefficients time histories for the chimney at 8 elevations along the chimney s height. The length of record corresponds to over 10 hours at full-scale. Figure 4: Wind tunnel model GEOTECHNICAL STUDY A geotechnical engineering consultant (Praad Geotechnical Inc. of Los Angeles, California) was retained to review previous geotechnical investigation reports of the site and conduct analysis to develop the lateral and vertical load versus displacement curves for the individual piles. Based on the information from previous reports, it was determined that the upper 15 to 17 feet of the soil consists of granular fill. An approximately 5 foot layer of soft silty material containing voids and organics exists below the fill material. Below the soft silty material is a relatively thick layer of medium dense to dense sands up to a depth of approximately 65 feet. Below the sand layer is dense, fragmented limestone. Figure 5 shows the adopted soil profile for the site. The computer program, LPILE Plus [4], was used to analyze the existing 10-inch diameter piles under lateral loading. In LPILE, the pile-soil interaction is modeled using non-linear springs characterized by pressure-displacement relations known as p-y curves. Different p-y curves can be incorporated into the program as a function of depth and for various types of soil. For the analyses, the piles were assumed to be embedded into the limestone material (approximately between 55 to 65 feet below ground surface). Figures 6 and 7 show load displacement curve developed by Praad Geotechnical Inc to represent the nonlinear behavior of piles underneath the chimney s foundation. Figure 6 indicates that a compressive force of 180 kips is the threshold above which permanent pile settlement is expected to occur. In addition, according to Figure 7 the ultimate vertical load capacity of piles is

Figure 20: Piles with forces larger than 255 kips (pile capacity) when subjected to maximum wind load (V=225 mph) Pile #19 Figure 21: Plot of maximum force-displacement response (pile number 19) during the time history analysis with wind loading when V=225 mph, Horizontal axis shows pile compressive force (kips) and vertical axis shows pile tip displacement (in)

Max. Pile cap permanent displacement for wind speed=157 mph Max. Pile displacement for wind speed=157 mph Max. Pile cap permanent displacement for wind speed=225 mph Max. Pile displacement for wind speed=225 mph Figure 22: Permanent downward displacement of piles for wind time history loading Max. Pile displacement for wind speed=225 mph Figure 23: Permanent downward displacement of piles for wind time history loading CONCLUSIONS The major conclusions that were determined from this study are: 1. Our analysis showed that for a 157 mph wind speed pile axial forces remain below the threshold where permanent pile settlement is expected. Therefore, no settlement is