Rock mechanics as a significant supplement for cross-section balancing (an example from the Pavlov Hills, Outer Western Carpathians, Czech Republic)

Similar documents
Answers: Internal Processes and Structures (Isostasy)

Study the architecture and processes responsible for deformation of Earth s crust. Folding and Faulting

The Frictional Regime

Strike-Slip Faults. ! Fault motion is parallel to the strike of the fault.

KEY CHAPTER 12 TAKE-HOME QUIZ INTERNAL STRUCTURES AND PROCESSES Score Part B = / 55 PART B

Brittle Deformation. Earth Structure (2 nd Edition), 2004 W.W. Norton & Co, New York Slide show by Ben van der Pluijm

Tectonics. Lecture 12 Earthquake Faulting GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD

GEOLOGIC MAPS PART II

Lecture 6 Folds, Faults and Deformation Dr. Shwan Omar

PROBLEM SET #X. 2) Draw a cross section from A-A using the topographic profile provided on page 3.

Provided by Tasa Graphic Arts, Inc. for An Introduction to Structural Methods DVD-ROM

Stress and Strain. Stress is a force per unit area. Strain is a change in size or shape in response to stress

Geologic Structures. Changes in the shape and/or orientation of rocks in response to applied stress

Part I. PRELAB SECTION To be completed before labs starts:

GLY 155 Introduction to Physical Geology, W. Altermann. Press & Siever, compressive forces. Compressive forces cause folding and faulting.

Chapter 15 Structures

Deformation of Rocks. Orientation of Deformed Rocks

Name. GEOL.5220 Structural Geology Faults, Folds, Outcrop Patterns and Geologic Maps. I. Properties of Earth Materials

Deepwater Niger Delta fold-and-thrust belt modeled as a critical-taper wedge: The influence of a weak detachment on styles of fault-related folds

UNIT 10 MOUNTAIN BUILDING AND EVOLUTION OF CONTINENTS

Lab 6: Plate tectonics, structural geology and geologic maps

GEOL372: Week 5 Thrust fault systems. Contractional regimes

Theme 7. Metamorphic rocks. Distinguishing rock types

Effect Of The In-Situ Stress Field On Casing Failure *

Lecture Outline Friday March 2 thru Wednesday March 7, 2018

Structure of the western Brooks Range fold and thrust belt, Arctic Alaska

Lecture 9 faults, folds and mountain building

Faults, folds and mountain building

GEOL5690: Fold and Thrust Belts and Orogenic Wedges ! = S 0

Structural Geology of the Mountains

GEOL 321 Structural Geology and Tectonics

Geology for Engineers Rock Mechanics and Deformation of Earth Materials

The effect of discontinuities on stability of rock blocks in tunnel

Course Title: Discipline: Geology Level: Basic-Intermediate Duration: 5 Days Instructor: Prof. Charles Kluth. About the course: Audience: Agenda:

What Causes Rock to Deform?

Crustal Deformation Earth - Chapter Pearson Education, Inc.

Earth Science, (Tarbuck/Lutgens) Chapter 10: Mountain Building

Chapter 6 Bearing Capacity

Mountains and Mountain Building: Chapter 11

Crustal Deformation. Earth Systems 3209

Material is perfectly elastic until it undergoes brittle fracture when applied stress reaches σ f

Structural Geology and Geology Maps Lab

NAME HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #3 MATERIAL COVERS CHAPTERS 8, 9, 10, 11

Plate Tectonics. entirely rock both and rock

GEOLOGY OF PRAGUE ITS INTERACTION WITH THE PRAGUE METRO

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

The Mesozoic. Wednesday, November 30, 11

Earthquakes. Forces Within Eartth. Faults form when the forces acting on rock exceed the rock s strength.

Mountains are then built by deforming crust: Deformation & Mountain Building. Mountains form where stresses are high!

Lab 7: STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY FOLDS AND FAULTS

Critical Borehole Orientations Rock Mechanics Aspects

Outline. Advances in STAR-CCM+ DEM models for simulating deformation, breakage, and flow of solids

How to Build a Mountain and other Geologic Structures. But first a short review

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 10 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

Lecture 15. Fold-Thrust Belts, and the NJ Ridge and Valley Thrust System

Ministry of Oil and Minerals Petroleum Exploration & Production Authority BLOCK 80 (WADI SARR)

Learning Objectives (LO) What we ll learn today:!

Copyright McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education

6. Crater Rim Uplift and Crater Wall Collapse

5. Crater Rim Uplift and Crater Wall Collapse

ANNOUNCEMENTS. Neighbor MEET & GREET. Turn to Neighbor: What is the difference between accretionary wedges and terranes?

Supplementary Material

Essentials of Geology, 11e

CRUSTAL DEFORMATION. Chapter 10

Name Student ID Exam 2c GEOL 1113 Fall 2009

Convergent plate boundary.

Structural Features and Fracture Orientation similarities between outcrops of the Ridgeley Sandstone

How mountains are made. We will talk about valleys (erosion and weathering later)

December 21, Chapter 11 mountain building E.notebook. Feb 19 8:19 AM. Feb 19 9:28 AM

Structural Style in the Peel Region, NWT and Yukon

Failure and Failure Theories for Anisotropic Rocks

Surface changes caused by erosion and sedimentation were treated by solving: (2)

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Prof. Deepankar Choudhury Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

PROCEEDINGS, INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION Thirty-Ninth Annual Convention and Exhibition, May 2015

Crustal Deformation. (Building Earth s Surface, Part 1) Science 330 Summer Mapping geologic structures

11.1 Rock Deformation

The Buried Fold-and-Thrust Belt in Sicily: Perspectives for Future Exploration*

The tectonic evolution history of Borneo is complicated and had been hotly debated

APPENDIX C GEOLOGICAL CHANCE OF SUCCESS RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

How to Build a Mountain and other Geologic Structures. But first, questions

Isan deformation, magmatism and extensional kinematics in the Western Fold Belt of the Mount Isa Inlier

BALOCHISTAN FOLDBELT BASIN

Lecture # 6. Geological Structures

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. Geophysics

Role of lithological layering on spatial variation of natural and induced fractures in hydraulic fracture stimulation

Structural Geology Lab. The Objectives are to gain experience

Unit 4 Lesson 7 Mountain Building

Stability Analysis of A Railway Trench By Using Stereographical Projection

Topics Laramide Orogeny: Late Cretaceous to Early Eocene Reading: GSA DNAG volume 3, Ch. 6

Depositional History and Petroleum Potential of Ombilin Basin, West Sumatra - Indonesia, Based on Surface Geological Data*

Exam Deformatie en Metamorfose van de Korst Educatorium zaal ALFA

Modeling Ithaca s Natural Hydraulic Fractures

A. Refer to Appendix F in back of lab manual for list of commonly used geologic map symbols

Chapter 16. Mountain Building. Mountain Building. Mountains and Plate Tectonics. what s the connection?

EAS FINAL EXAM

Staple this part to part one of lab 6 and turn in. Lab 6, part two: Structural geology (analysis)

Vail et al., 1977b. AAPG 1977 reprinted with permission of the AAPG whose permission is required for further use.

Deformation: Modification of Rocks by Folding and Fracturing

Module 5: Failure Criteria of Rock and Rock masses. Contents Hydrostatic compression Deviatoric compression

Block 43B - Onshore Oman

Transcription:

Trabajos de Geología, Universidad de Oviedo, 30 : 140-144 (2010) Rock mechanics as a significant supplement for cross-section balancing (an example from the Pavlov Hills, Outer Western Carpathians, Czech Republic) I. POUL 1, 2* AND R. MELICHAR 3 1Czech Geological Survey (branch office Brno), Leitnerova 22, 658 69 Brno, Czech Republic. 2Institute of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Veveri 331/95, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic. 3Institute of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic. *e-mail: istvan@igeo.cz Abstract: Methods of rock mechanics and mechanical testing are a suitable supplement to tectonic analysis and structural reconstruction in areas where structures are not clearly visible. Rock mechanics enhances tectonic research of young non-deep eroded orogenic belts, where past lithostatic stress acquired quite similar values to present-day ones. This paper focusses on cross-section balancing in frontal parts of nappes of the Outer Western Carpathians. Keywords: rock mechanics, cross-section balancing, limestones, angle of internal friction, Mohr- Coulomb criterion, thrusts, Western Carpathians. The Jurassic limestones under study are situated at the western margin of the Zdanice Nappe of the Outer Western Carpathians in the easternmost part of the Czech Republic. The limestone plate consists of three stratigraphic units: Klentnice Fm (Oxfodian- Tithonian), nodular limestones (Tithonian) and Erstbrunn limestones (Tithonian). Dark-gray deepmarine carbonatic claystones (Klentnice Fm) continuously grade to tectofacies of thin nodular limestones and consequently to light shallow-marine massive limestones (Ernstbrunn Lst). The Upper Cretaceous, mostly siliciclastic sediments overlie the Jurassic limestones. The Jurassic and Cretaceous preflysh sediments are surrounded by the Paleogene hemipelagic and flysh claystones and sandstones. As the Ernstbrunn limestones are not easily eroded, these rocks form significant morphological elevations (Pavlov Hills). The structure of the Pavlov Hills was formed during folding and thrusting within the Outer Carpathian accretionary wedge in the younger phase of the Alpine orogeny (Lower Miocene). The pre-flysh Mesozoic sediments form basal parts of the Zdanice Nappe, but their uppermost part was cut off by the second thrust. The mechanical features of the stratigraphic units under consideration depend on lithology. The claystones of Klentnice Fm as well as pelagic Paleogene sediments are soft with reduced shear strength in contrast to competent Ernstbrunn limestones. Mechanical rock tests and their results The mechanical properties of various rocks could be described through different physical and mechanical analyses. The most important features in the structural studies are stiffness and angle of internal friction. The rela-

ROCK MECHANICS AS A SIGNIFICANT SUPPLEMENT FOR CROSS-SECTION BALANCING IN THE CARPATHIANS 141 tionship between limit of shear stress τ crit and normal stress σ n is expressed by the terms of Mohr-Coulomb criteria: τ crit = tan φ σ n + τ 0 (1), where ϕ is angle of internal friction and τ 0 is shear cohesion (Goodman, 1989). This linear model predicts failure occurrence when the applied shear stress τ exceeds the frictional resistance τ crit. The test in unconfined compression and the Brazilian test (in splitting tension) allow us to determine the angle of internal friction, given by φ = 90-2α, where α is an angle between fracture surface and the σ 1 direction (Fig. 1), and the value of stiffness (in unconfined compression σ c and in splitting tension σ d ). We obtain some points of the Mohr envelope by combining φ and σ c, other points were obtained by σ d. Using the least square method for the best solution we obtain the Mohr-Coulomb criteria equation with averaged angle of internal friction in the interval from σ d to σ c. Although the angle of internal friction varies greatly under normal tensile stress conditions, it is more or less constant under low compression stress conditions, and the Mohr-Coulomb criterion can be accepted. The values of the angle of internal friction acquired in the unconfined compression test will be applied in the following text. Averaged experimental results are outlined in table 1. The final angle of internal friction φ aw = 50 used for cross-section balancing was counted as a thickness-weighted average of experimental data. Consequently, the angle between bedding planes and ramps may be estimated at Φ = 20. Figure 1. Ruptured rock samples after laboratory tests: (a) unconfined compression, (b) Brazilian, (c) Brazilian, cross-section. Table 1. Mechanical parameters of significant rocks from the Pavlov Hills.

142 I. POUL AND R. MELICHAR Figure 2. Simplified structural map of the Pavlov Hills.

ROCK MECHANICS AS A SIGNIFICANT SUPPLEMENT FOR CROSS-SECTION BALANCING IN THE CARPATHIANS 143 Figure3. Balanced cross-section 1-2 through Devin Hill. Tectonics of the Pavlov Hills and cross-section balancing The area under study was subjected to detailed geological mapping including the collection of compass data. Several anticlines associated with thrusts were recognized (Figs. 2 and 3). Anticlines are slightly plunging to the NE, i.e. in the same direction as the thrusts strike. We interpret this structure as faultbend folds. En echelon arrangement was explained as block displacement along NW-SE striking faults (Poul and Melichar, 2006). Thus, the principles of cross section were outlined, but not all information for balanced ones was available. We used hand-made balancing based on structural and lithological data supplemented by two seismic cross-sections, five boreholes and mechanical data. Conservation of bed length and area principles were assumed (Suppe, 1983), construction and testing were made with AutoCAD software. Thrusts and ramps exposed on Devin Hill are documented in stratigraphic repetitions of the Jurassic and Cretaceous beds in outcrops (Jüttner, 1922) as Figure 4. Balanced cross-section 3-4 through Stolova Hora Mountain with seismic section (290/87).

144 I. POUL AND R. MELICHAR well as in the borehole Palava-1. Beds are dipping about 30-50 to the SE. Some changes in bed dips were recognized in compass data and beds in the SE dip at almost double the angle of those in the NW. Differences between bedding dips correspond to the ramp forming angle as well as to the experimental φ-angle. Some inconsistency in the thickness of nodular limestones is regarded as the result of tectonic sliding. The Svaty Kopecek [Saint Hill] anticline is situated in the eastern vicinity of Mikulov. As the fold axis plunges to the NE, it was possible to recognize its NE prolongation in the seismic cross sections (figure 2, cross section 3-4; see figure 4). This anticlinal structure was drilled through at depth by Nove Mlyny-3 borehole, where anomalous thickness of Klentnice Fm was discovered. In our cross section this structure is constructed as an antiformal fault-bend fold stack of several slices cut by ramps under 20. The main detachment is set at the base of Klentnice Fm and the second one is in nodular limestones, whereas the ramps are situated in the rigid Ernstbrunn limestones. References GOODMAN, R. E. (1989): Introduction to rock mechanics, second edition. John Wiley & Sons, 576 pp. JÜTTNER, K. (1922): Enstehung und Bau der Pollauer Berge, Nikolsburg. Discussion and conclusions The original angle of ramp dip is one of the critical limits for balanced cross section constructions. Our experimental data predicted ramps under 20. This value was verified by field compass bed orientation as well as by seismic cross section. Differences in dips of beds from two upper slices on the Devin Hill (32 and 50 ) and from two lower ones in cross-section (Figs. 3 and 4, 12 and 32 ) can be explained assuming the same ramp forming angle. In this way the mechanical testing of rock may be used as an additional method for ramp-angle determination. It is very important to note that the experimental ramp angle makes it possible to construct a correct balanced cross section. Limitations to the application of the method are connected with conditions of deformation, which have to be reproducable in laboratory equipment, i.e. have to be comparable to Earth surface conditions. Such a situation exists in young orogenic belts, where denudation processes have not eroded the youngest rocks. POUL, I. and MELICHAR, R. (2006): A ramp-and-flat geometry of thrust faults in the Pavlovske vrchy Hills, Western Carpathians, Czech Republic. Geolines, 20: 113. SUPPE, J. (1983): Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding. Am. J. Sci., 283: 684-721.