Crystal Structure and Electron Diffraction

Similar documents
Diffraction of Electrons

Electron Diffraction

Electron Diffraction

The University of Hong Kong Department of Physics

Chapter 10: Wave Properties of Particles

Atomic and Nuclear Physics

λ = h = h p mv λ = h mv FXA 2008 Candidates should be able to :

Experiment 12 ELECTRON DIFFRACTION. Diffraction by Graphite 1. Diffraction by Aluminum 3. The Electron Diffraction Apparatus 5

(Re-write, January 2011, from notes of S. C. Fain Jr., L. Sorensen, O. E. Vilches, J. Stoltenberg and D. B. Pengra, Version 1, preliminary)

V 11: Electron Diffraction

Instytut Fizyki Doświadczalnej Wydział Matematyki, Fizyki i Informatyki UNIWERSYTET GDAŃSKI

M2 TP. Low-Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED)

Part 3: HANDS-ON ACTIVITIES

E. K. A. ADVANCED PHYSICS LABORATORY PHYSICS 3081, 4051

ELECTRON DIFFRACTION

Particles and Waves Particles Waves

Episode 506: Particles as waves

de Broglie Waves h p de Broglie argued Light exhibits both wave and particle properties

Electron Diffraction. 1 Introduction. 2 Electron diffraction apparatus

ELECTRON CURRENT IMAGE DIFFRACTION FROM CRYSTAL SURFACES AT LOW ENERGIES

SOLID STATE 18. Reciprocal Space

Name the region of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the laser. ...

3.012 Structure An Introduction to X-ray Diffraction

Quantum Interference and Duality

Investigations of Wave-Particle Duality by Kent Ames North Gwinnett High School

Experiment 2 Deflection of Electrons

Quantum Mechanics Tutorial

Chapter (5) Matter Waves

Chapter 37 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom

Structure of Surfaces

The structure of liquids and glasses. The lattice and unit cell in 1D. The structure of crystalline materials. Describing condensed phase structures

Wave nature of particles

RED. BLUE Light. Light-Matter

Revision Guide. Chapter 7 Quantum Behaviour

Röntgenpraktikum. M. Oehzelt. (based on the diploma thesis of T. Haber [1])

8.04 Spring 2013 February 13, 2013 Problem 1. (15 points) Radiative collapse of a classical atom

TEP Examination of the structure of NaCl monocrystals with different orientations

Mid Term Exam 1. Feb 13, 2009

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com 1

Photoelectric Effect Experiment

Announcements. Lecture 8 Chapter. 3 Wave & Particles I. EM- Waves behaving like Particles. The Compton effect (Arthur Compton 1927) Hypothesis:

Lecture 35 (de Broglie & Matter Waves) Physics Fall 2018 Douglas Fields

Chapter 4: The Wave Nature of Matter

Resolution: maximum limit of diffraction (asymmetric)

High-Resolution. Transmission. Electron Microscopy

Semiconductor Physics and Devices

THE CHARGE-TO-MASS RATIO OF THE ELECTRON (e/m)

CHAPTER 5 Wave Properties of Matter and Quantum Mechanics I

Laboratory Manual 1.0.6

Homework 2: Forces on Charged Particles

Brown University PHYS 0060 Physics Department LAB B -190

tip conducting surface


Charge to Mass Ratio of the Electron

X-ray, Neutron and e-beam scattering

The Wave Nature of Matter *

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

AP5301/ Name the major parts of an optical microscope and state their functions.

This experiment is included in the XRP 4.0 X-ray solid state, XRS 4.0 X-ray structural analysis, and XRC 4.0 X-ray characteristics upgrade sets.

Measurement of Charge-to-Mass (e/m) Ratio for the Electron

Basic Crystallography Part 1. Theory and Practice of X-ray Crystal Structure Determination

1 Review of semiconductor materials and physics

Which of the following can be used to calculate the resistive force acting on the brick? D (Total for Question = 1 mark)

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B. Tech (New)/SEM-1/PH-101/ PHYSICS-I

CHARGE TO MASS RATIO FOR THE ELECTRON

Title / paragraph example Topic: Quantum Computers. Course Essay. Photoelectric effect summary. From Last Time. Compton scattering

[2] (b) An electron is accelerated from rest through a potential difference of 300 V.

PHY202 Quantum Mechanics. Topic 1. Introduction to Quantum Physics

Lecture 2: Quantum Mechanics and Relativity

Finding e/m. Purpose. The purpose of this lab is to determine the charge to mass ratio of the electron. Equipment

Chapter 27. Quantum Physics

Wave Nature of Matter

Title / paragraph example Topic: Quantum Computers. Course essay. Photoelectric effect summary. From Last Time. Photon interference?

Chapter Six: X-Rays. 6.1 Discovery of X-rays

Physics 280 Week 04 In-Class Problems Summer 2016

Experiment 5 Deflection of Electrons

Show that the threshold frequency for the surface is approximately Hz.

General Physics (PHY 2140)

Chap. 3. Elementary Quantum Physics

Surface Sensitivity & Surface Specificity

Lecture PowerPoints. Chapter 27 Physics: Principles with Applications, 7th edition Giancoli

Lab 1: Determination of e/m for the electron

Transmission Electron Microscope. Experimental Instruction

1 Photoelectric effect - Classical treatment. 2 Photoelectric effect - Quantum treatment

LECTURE # 17 Modern Optics Matter Waves

B = 8 0 NI/[r (5) 3/2 ],

WAVE PARTICLE DUALITY

STSF2223 Quantum Mechanics I

X-ray practical: Crystallography

LC-4: Photoelectric Effect

disordered, ordered and coherent with the substrate, and ordered but incoherent with the substrate.

Handout 7 Reciprocal Space

Laboratory 14: Ratio of Charge to Mass for the Electron

LAB 01 X-RAY EMISSION & ABSORPTION

Chapter 2. X-ray X. Diffraction and Reciprocal Lattice. Scattering from Lattices

( ) # velocity. Wavelengths of massive objects. From Last Time. Wavelength of electron. Wavelength of 1 ev electron. A little complicated ( ) " = h mv

Crystal planes. Neutrons: magnetic moment - interacts with magnetic materials or nuclei of non-magnetic materials. (in Å)

Quantum Mechanics (made fun and easy)

Lecture 21 Matter acts like waves!

Modern Physics. Ans: 1. According to de broglie hypothesis, any moving particle is associated with a wave.

Transcription:

Crystal Structure and Electron Diffraction References: Kittel C.: Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8 th ed. Wiley 005 University of Michigan, PHY441-44 (Advanced Physics Laboratory Experiments, Electron Diffraction). PHYWE Laboratory Experiments, Electron diffraction TEP 5.1.13 1 weight Introduction The Electron Diffraction (discovered by Davisson and Germer in 197) is one of the most famous experiments in the history of Physics. It demonstrated the wave-particle duality, showing that fast electrons hitting a smooth nickel sample yielded a strong diffraction peak. The hypothesis that particles should behave like waves was predicted by De Broglie in 196. The De Broglie relation related momentum p and wavelength λ: λ = h p 34 15 Where: h = 6.66 10 J s = 4.136 10 ev is Planck s constant. In order to observe a wave-like behaviour of electrons, a grating was needed, with slits separation of the same order as the wavelength. In a typical lab setting (a couple of kv of accelerating potential) the De Broglie wavelength of an electron is about 1 Å (10-8 cm), corresponding to the inter-atomic spacing in common crystals. Crystals contain periodic structural elements serving as a diffraction grating that scatters the electrons in a predictable way. The diffraction pattern of an electron beam passing through a layer of a crystalline material contains information about the crystal structure. Some theory In a cathode ray tube, electrons are accelerated through a high voltage U A, acquiring a kinetic 1 p energy: mv = = e U A () m The wavelength associated with electrons is obtained from (1) and (): h 19 31 λ = where e = 1.60 10 A s (the electron charge) and m = 9.109 10 kg m e U A is the rest mass of the electron. Note: at the voltages used (less than 10kV), the relativistic mass can be substituted by the rest mass with an error of only 0.5%. Diffraction of electrons on a crystal assumes that the regular arrays of atoms are reflective planes, acting as simple plane mirrors. Reflection occurs in accordance with the Bragg condition: d sinθ = n λ (3) where d is the spacing between the planes of the crystal structure and θ is the Bragg angle (between the beam and the lattice planes). n is an integer (n = 1,, 3...). Bragg formulated (3) by analyzing X-ray diffraction on crystals. (1) 1

Figure 1: Bragg s model of crystal diffraction as multiple reflections on lattice planes. θ is the Bragg angle θ Bragg. Davison and Germer s electron diffraction data were completely accidental. They observed a strong peak in electron scattering from nickel. Using Bragg s condition for wavelength and the known lattice constant of nickel, they verified the De Broglie hypothesis. The experiment will be done with a graphite (carbon) crystal that has a hexagonal structure. Figure Graphite unit cell In polycrystalline graphite, the bond between the individual layers is broken, so their orientation is random. A poly-crystal (powder) is a conglomerate of a large number of small crystal domains. An electron beam is spread out in form of a cone and produces interference rings on a fluorescent screen. In Figure 3, the crystalline planes (100) and (110) which give rise to the inner and outer rings in the electron diffraction tube are presented. These spacings have been defined in terms of the unit vectors a and b where a = b in the hexagonal structure. The indices (100), (110), etc. are known as Miller indices: Figure 3 Two dimensional lattice spacings for graphite The ratio of the d-spacings in a hexagonal 3 structure is d 100 / d110 =. 1

The Method The electron beam emitted by a hot filament hits a polycrystalline graphite sample located in a vacuumed tube. The beam is spread out and forms interference patterns. Maxima will be arranged in the form of circles on the fluorescent screen, corresponding to cones with apex on the graphite sample (see Figures 4 and 5). Fig. 4 Electron diffraction experimental result. Fig. 5 The electron diffraction angle. 1 r The diffraction cones have half-angles given by: θ Bragg tan (4) R where r is radius of the -dimensional diffraction pattern (circle) and D = R is diameter of the tube. Assuming small diffraction angles and negligible error due to the tube curvature, sinθ ~ tanθ and sinθ ~ sinθ Combining (3) and (4), we obtain: R R r = nλ = n d d h meu a Equation (5) shows clearly that the observed diffraction/interference radii r depend on the anode voltage U a. (5) 3

The experiment The equipment will be wired for you. Setup will consist of: - Electron diffraction tube, radius R = 65 mm - Power supply unit (6.3V AC, 0-0V DC, 0-300V DC, 0-380 V DC) - High voltage supply unit, 0 10 kv - Plastic vernier caliper. Adjust the bias voltage G1 at ~0V. Do not change voltages at grids G4 and G3 as they are pre-set at the right values. Turning on: turn on the voltmeter and the Leybold power supply unit. Wait for 30 seconds (this allows the electron gun to warm up), then turn on the high voltage and wait another 1 minute. Turning off: slowly turn down the high voltage to zero and then turn off the Leybold power supply unit and the voltmeter. Read the anode voltage at the display of the HV power supply. To determine the diameter of the diffraction rings, measure the inner and the outer edge of the rings with the plastic vernier caliper and take the average. You may also measure any further interference rings which you can recognise. Dimming the room lights would help. Note: the bright spot in the middle of the screen may damage the fluorescent layer of the tube. Reduce the light intensity after each reading as soon as possible. Measure the first two radii of the first order of diffraction (n = 1) at different anode high voltages between.5 kv and 6.0 kv and plot r as a function of λ (use Python to plot). Using (5), calculate the lattice constants d 100 and d 110 of graphite. Note: DO NOT exceed 6. kv! It may damage the tube! Estimate and discuss the possible errors of the measurement. Some errors are: using a non-relativistic formula for electron momentum; using approximate relations for small angles, neglecting the curvature of the tube face, etc. Questions Have you observed the wave nature of the electron? Give one example of the electron showing its particle-like nature in this experiment. Discuss your results. Graphite consists of layers of carbon atoms with an average separation between layers of 3.4 Å. Assume that each layer has the hexagonal structure shown in Figure 6: Figure 6. Hexagonal structure of graphite 4

Considering the unit cell being an equilateral triangle, calculate: a) The nearest neighbor distance x between atoms within each layer. b) The average spacing between carbon atoms. Compare the average spacing with the two measured lattice constants and also with the nearest neighbor distance. 3 Useful constants: Avogadro number: N A = 6.0 10 atoms / mol, Atomic weight of carbon: 3 W = 1g / mol ; Density of graphite: ρ = C.5g / cm This guide was written by Ruxandra M. Serbanescu in 013 Appendix: Miller indices Understanding the physical correspondence between an electron diffraction pattern and the crystal structure requires a formal knowledge of the crystal lattice. The orientation of a surface or a crystal plane may be defined by considering how the plane intersects the main crystallographic axes of the solid. Miller indices (hkl) are a set of numbers which quantify the intercepts of the crystal planes with the axes, and thus may be used to uniquely identify the plane or surface. They express lattice planes and directions. The following procedure to assign the Miller indices is simplified (it is a "recipe") and only applies to a cubic crystal system (one having a cubic unit cell with dimensions a x a x a). The rules are: - Identify the intercepts of the plane with the x, y and z axes - Specify the intercepts in fractional coordinates, dividing by the cell dimension in that direction - Take the reciprocal of the fractional intercepts. Consider the following plane surface in a cubic crystal of side a: The intercepts are: a,,. Fractional coordinate intercepts are: a/a, /a, /a or: 1,,. Reciprocal of fractional coordinates: 1, 0, 0 Miller indices for the surface: (100). 5

The (110) surface: Intercepts: a, a, Fractional intercepts: 1, 1, Miller indices: (110). The (111) surface: Intercepts: a, a, a. Fractional intercepts: 1, 1, 1 Miller indices: (111). For a cubic crystal of side a, the distance between a generic plane (khl) and a parallel plane that passes through the origin is given by: d = k a + h + l (hkl) denotes a crystallographic plane. {khl} denotes a family of crystallographic planes ((khl), (lkh), (hlk), etc.). In the cubic system, planes having the same indices regardless of order or sign are equivalent. Negative values are expressed with a bar over the number (Example: - is expressed as ). In the cubic system, a plane and a direction with the same indices are orthogonal. 6