Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report

Similar documents
Load combinations will be created according to the below option.

Project Name Wind Analysis Report Presented to: Client Logo Revision Generated by Date Reviewed by Date Comment

EUROCODES. User's Guide to Excel spreadsheet file Verification tests EN : Eurocode 1. SPREADSHEETS Structural Design TRYOUT - November 2015

Section 20 Eurocode 1 EN Section 7 (Page 61 to 65)


Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES. Static calculations of 12 m tent. Prepared for: Kibæk pressening. Revision 0, March 23, 2016

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Structural Calculations For:

Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

From Table 1 4. DL = [12 lb/ft 2 # in.(6 in.)] (15 ft)(10 ft) = 10,800 lb. LL = (250 lb/ft 2 )(15 ft)(10 ft) = 37,500 lb.

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

Operation mode: Auger Drilling Completed by: R. Savi 22/08/2015 Checked by: Main Components :

Regional Wind Vulnerability. Extratropical Cyclones Differ from Tropical Cyclones in Ways That Matter

NATIONAL ANNEX TO STANDARD. SFS-EN EUROCODE 1: ACTIONS ON STRUCTURES Part 1 3: General Actions. Snow loads

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

4 Initial Sizing of members

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4

Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Tsing Yi) Higher Diploma in Civil Engineering Structural Mechanics. Chapter 1 PRINCIPLES OF STATICS

ValkPitched - Trapezoidal

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD

Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Centralized Forecasting Registration and Communication Requirements for Distribution Connected Variable Generators. IESO Training

Photometric Report. 42 Partners Limited 21 Woden Road Wolverhampton WV10 0AU UK

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK

Operation mode: W.R. 2,025 m Completed by: 3/11/2010 Checked by: Main Components :

a 1 ft2 144 in 2 b 26 in.

ValkPitched - Trapezoidal Rivet

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

World Shelters. U-Dome 200. Dome Shelter. Engineering Report: Dome Structure ER October South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA USA

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design

ValkField - Single Row

Basic information about developed Calculator for solar / wind hybrid power supply

Entrance exam Master Course

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

Test Report. RI Acoustic Lab. Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for RockDelta NoiStop Noise Barrier. 20 Feb. 07

ValkPitched - Trapezoidal

ValkField - Single Row

Special edition paper

Traceable Mass Determination and Uncertainty Calculation

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1

Quasi-static simulation approaches on rollover impact of a bus structure

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1

Northern Alberta Institute of Technology

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

TINTAGEL CASTLE FOOTBRIDGE OPTIONS APPRAISAL. Feasibility Report July 2014

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Eurocode 1: Actions on structures

2D - STRIP ANCHOR LIFTING SYSTEM

Steps to Reduce the Risk of Tornado Damage in Commercial Structures

Wind Resistant Design AIJ Recommendations for Wind Loads on Buildings

Weathertightness testing of Solar Slate Plate to MCS012. Prepared for: Michael Share. Solar Slate Plate. 24 th June Test report number

TECHNICAL DESIGN CALCULATION REPORT

Thermodynamics I Spring 1432/1433H (2011/2012H) Saturday, Wednesday 8:00am - 10:00am & Monday 8:00am - 9:00am MEP 261 Class ZA

Guidelines for protecting berthing structures from scour caused by ships

SPECIAL CONDITION. Water Load Conditions. SPECIAL CONDITION Water Load Conditions

Metal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. Example 10 - Sign

Code No: R Set No. 1

pifreeze A Freeze / Thaw Plug-in for FEFLOW User Guide

Engineering Mechanics. Equivalent force systems: problems

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Hygrothermal Performance of Ventilated Cold Roofs an Experimental Study

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification

PORTMORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY

Design and Stability Analysis of Solar Panel Supporting Structure Subjected to Wind Force

APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS, NOTATIONS, AND SI CONVERSION FACTORS

Module 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Test Reports UL Classified Products

COMPOSITION OF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY BATTERY CHARGING STATION

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, 2014

LICENCE. for. Click on the red box above to activate the Licence Agreement scroll bar. WEB LINKS

Tekla Structural Designer 2016i

Drying out capacity and snow melting risk for ventilated wooden roofs - a parameter study

WRITE ALL YOUR CALCULATIONS IN THE BLUEBOOK PUT YOUR NAME AND THE TEST IN THE BLUEBOOK AND HAND IN

Tsunami Load Determination for On-Shore Structures. Harry Yeh Oregon State University

Standard Assessment Procedure

Geology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.

3D numerical simulations and full scale measurements of snow depositions on a curved roof

Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TALL BUILDING UNDER PULSATION WIND EXCITATION

COMPARISONS OF A TALL BUILDING WIND RESPONSE WITH AND WITHOUT A TMD

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

Forces and Newton s Laws Reading Notes. Give an example of a force you have experienced continuously all your life.

Expedited Filing Draft August 22, 2017

Unit 1: Engineering Principles

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

SHORELINE PROVISIONS RESIDENTIAL LOT

Transcription:

Company Name Or Logo Here Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report In accordance with Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems 2012 2 nd Edition Reference number 001 Company Name Solar Company Date 26/11/2014 Address of property Post Code Software Tedds 2014 Page 1 of 12

Table of Contents 1. APPLIED LOADINGS 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PANELS FOR GRAVITY LOADS 3. JUSTIFICATION OF PANELS FOR UPLIFT LOADS 4. CONCLUSIONS Disclaimer: The Desk Top Appraisal Report has been produced from information supplied by the client. Solar Roof Surveys cannot be held responsible for any damage caused from the supply of limited information or damage caused due to inaccuracies within the information supplied or non-compliance with Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems 2012 2 nd Edition Page 2 of 12

1. APPLIED LOADINGS. In considering the applied loading we have designed as noted below: Dead loads are based on the actual specified make up for the existing roof. Imposed loads are based on the loadings within (BS EN 1991-1-1). Wind loadings are calculated on a site specific basis. Applied loads are as follows: EXISTING ROOF MAKE UP: DEAD LOADS Existing Tiles = 0.55kN/m2 Existing Felt = 0.02kN/m2 Existing Trusses = 0.15kN/m2 Total DL = 0.72kN/m BS EN 1991-1-1 states: 3.3.2 On roofs which are not accessible except for normal maintenance and repair, imposed loads need not be applied in combination with either snow loads and /or wind action. EXISTING ROOF WIND LOADINGS: Calculated using TEDDS design software for both positive and negative internal pressure and for wind acting both perpendicular and parallel to the front elevation of the building. EXISTING ROOF SNOW LOADINGS: Calculated using TEDDS design software for both basic and where appropriate complex snow loadings. Page 3 of 12

WIND LOADING (EN1991-1-4) TEDDS calculation version 3.0.13 11600 Plan 7600 Elevation Building data Type of roof; Length of building; Width of building; Height to eaves; Pitch of roof; Total height; Duopitch L = 11600 mm W = 7600 mm H = 4900 mm α 0 = 32.0 deg h = 7275 mm Basic values Location; Bournemouth Wind speed velocity (FigureNA.1); v b,map = 21.9 m/s Distance to shore; L shore = 11.20 km Altitude above sea level; A alt = 22.0m Altitude factor; c alt = A alt 0.001m -1 + 1 = 1.022 Fundamental basic wind velocity; v b,0 = v b,map c alt = 22.4 m/s Direction factor; c dir = 1.00 Season factor; c season = 1.00 Shape parameter K; K = 0.2 Exponent n; n = 0.5 Probability factor; c prob = [(1 - K ln(-ln(1-p)))/(1 - K ln(-ln(0.98)))] n = 1.00 Basic wind velocity (Exp. 4.1); v b = c dir c season v b,0 c prob = 22.4 m/s Reference mean velocity pressure; q b = 0.5 ρ v 2 b = 0.307 kn/m 2 Orography Orography factor not significant; c o = 1.0 Terrain category; Sea Displacement height (sheltering effect excluded); h dis = 0mm The velocity pressure for the windward face of the building with a 0 degree wind is to be considered as 1 part as the height h is less than b (cl.7.2.2) The velocity pressure for the windward face of the building with a 90 degree wind is to be considered as 1 part as the height h is less than b (cl.7.2.2) Peak velocity pressure - windward wall - Wind 0 deg and roof Reference height (at which q is sought); z = 4900mm Displacement height (sheltering effects excluded); h dis = 0 mm Exposure factor (Figure NA.7); c e = 2.02 Peak velocity pressure; q p = c e q b = 0.62 kn/m 2 Page 4 of 12

Structural factor Structural damping; δ s = 0.100 Height of element; h part = 4900 mm Size factor (Table NA.3); c s = 0.92 Dynamic factor (Figure NA.9); c d = 1.02 Structural factor; c scd = c s c d = 0.939 Peak velocity pressure - windward wall - Wind 90 deg and roof Reference height (at which q is sought); z = 7275mm Displacement height (sheltering effects excluded); h dis = 0 mm Exposure factor (Figure NA.7); c e = 2.27 Peak velocity pressure; q p = c e q b = 0.70 kn/m 2 Structural factor Structural damping; δ s = 0.100 Height of element; h part = 7275 mm Size factor (Table NA.3); c s = 0.93 Dynamic factor (Figure NA.9); c d = 1.03 Structural factor; c scd = c s c d = 0.959 Structural factor - roof 0 deg Structural damping; δ s = 0.100 Height of element; h part = 7275 mm Size factor (Table NA.3); c s = 0.92 Dynamic factor (Figure NA.9); c d = 1.02 Structural factor; c scd = c s c d = 0.935 Peak velocity pressure for internal pressure Peak velocity pressure internal (as roof press.); q p,i = 0.70 kn/m 2 Pressures and forces Net pressure; Net force; p = c scd q p c pe - q p,i c pi; F w = p w A ref; Roof load case 1 - Wind 0, c pi -0.3, +c pe Zone Ext pressure coefficient c pe Peak velocity pressure q p, (kn/m 2 ) Net pressure p (kn/m 2 ) Area A ref (m 2 ) Net force F w (kn) F (+ve) 0.80 0.70 0.73 7.93 5.79 G (+ve) 0.51 0.70 0.54 7.93 4.31 H (+ve) 0.44 0.70 0.50 36.11 17.90 I (+ve) -0.50 0.70-0.12 36.11-4.22 J (+ve) -0.89 0.70-0.37 15.87-5.85 Total vertical net force; F w,v = 15.22 kn Total horizontal net force; F w,h = 20.17 kn Walls load case 1 - Wind 0, c pi -0.3, +c pe Zone Ext pressure coefficient c pe Peak velocity pressure q p, (kn/m 2 ) Net pressure p (kn/m 2 ) Area A ref (m 2 ) Net force F w (kn) A -1.20 0.70-0.58 13.05-7.52 B -0.80 0.70-0.31 33.21-10.44 D 0.79 0.62 0.67 56.84 38.16 Page 5 of 12

E -0.49 0.62-0.08 56.84-4.28 Overall loading Equiv leeward net force for overall section; F l = F w,we = -4.3 kn Net windward force for overall section; F w = F w,wd = 38.2 kn Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) Note); f corr = 0.85; as h/w is 0.957 Overall loading overall section; F w,d = f corr (F w - F l + F w,h) = 53.2 kn Roof load case 2 - Wind 90, c pi 0.20, -c pe Zone Ext pressure coefficient c pe Peak velocity pressure q p, (kn/m 2 ) Net pressure p (kn/m 2 ) Area A ref (m 2 ) Net force F w (kn) F (-ve) -1.20 0.70-0.94 3.41-3.21 G (-ve) -1.11 0.70-0.88 3.41-3.01 H (-ve) -0.60 0.70-0.54 27.24-14.73 I (-ve) -0.49 0.70-0.46 69.90-32.49 Total vertical net force; F w,v = -45.32 kn Total horizontal net force; F w,h = 0.00 kn Walls load case 2 - Wind 90, c pi 0.20, -c pe Zone Ext pressure coefficient c pe Peak velocity pressure q p, (kn/m 2 ) Net pressure p (kn/m 2 ) Area A ref (m 2 ) Net force F w (kn) A -1.20 0.62-0.85 7.45-6.35 B -0.80 0.62-0.62 29.79-18.32 C -0.50 0.62-0.44 19.60-8.56 D 0.75 0.70 0.36 46.26 16.76 E -0.40 0.70-0.41 46.26-18.84 Overall loading Equiv leeward net force for overall section; F l = F w,we = -18.8 kn Net windward force for overall section; F w = F w,wd = 16.8 kn Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) Note); f corr = 0.85; as h/l is 0.627 Overall loading overall section; F w,d = f corr (F w - F l + F w,h) = 30.3 kn Roof load case 3 - Wind 90, c pi -0.3, +c pe Zone Ext pressure coefficient c pe Peak velocity pressure q p, (kn/m 2 ) Net pressure p (kn/m 2 ) Area A ref (m 2 ) Net force F w (kn) F (+ve) 0.51 0.70 0.55 3.41 1.88 G (+ve) 0.41 0.70 0.49 3.41 1.65 H (+ve) 0.31 0.70 0.42 27.24 11.40 I (+ve) 0.21 0.70 0.35 69.90 24.59 Total vertical net force; F w,v = 33.52 kn Total horizontal net force; F w,h = 0.00 kn Page 6 of 12

Walls load case 3 - Wind 90, c pi -0.3, +c pe Zone Ext pressure coefficient c pe Peak velocity pressure q p, (kn/m 2 ) Net pressure p (kn/m 2 ) Area A ref (m 2 ) Net force F w (kn) A -1.20 0.62-0.50 7.45-3.76 B -0.80 0.62-0.27 29.79-7.94 C -0.50 0.62-0.09 19.60-1.73 D 0.75 0.70 0.71 46.26 32.88 E -0.40 0.70-0.06 46.26-2.72 Overall loading Equiv leeward net force for overall section; F l = F w,we = -2.7 kn Net windward force for overall section; F w = F w,wd = 32.9 kn Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) Note); f corr = 0.85; as h/l is 0.627 Overall loading overall section; F w,d = f corr (F w - F l + F w,h) = 30.3 kn Page 7 of 12

D 2320 5280 11600 Windward face A B E 7600 Side face 11600 Leeward face 11600 Wind - 90 o 760 3040 7800 Plan view - Duopitch roof Page 8 of 12

D 7600 Windward face 6080 4000 A B C E 11600 Side face 7600 Leeward face Page 9 of 12

2. JUSTIFICATION OF PANELS FOR GRAVITY LOADS From the calculated loads we see that each panel weighs 17.25kg and is 1639mm by 982mm. Therefore the weight per m2 = 10.72kg/m2. The support frame weighs 2kg/m2 Total dead load = 12.72 kg/m2 = 0.1272 kn/n2 Once the panel is in situ this area of roof will not be trafficked and so there is no need to consider the actual weight of the panel as being an additional imposed load on the roof. Should anyone stand on the panel it will destroyed, the owner of the property will therefore take strict steps to ensure that no one at any time stands on the panel. Therefore this area of roof can be considered as carrying less than the design imposed load indicated in EN1991-1-1. Therefore there is no requirement for strengthening as a result of combined imposed load and panel load. With regards snow loading we see that the snow load is 0.28kN/m2. This load will be cumulative to the weight of the panel. Ref to Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems 2012 2 nd Edition. Dead Load = 0.72 kn/m2 less Snow Load = 0.28kN/m2 = 0.44 kn/m2 0.44 + 0.1272 = 0.565 kn/m2 which is within the design load of 0.75kN/m2 Page 10 of 12

SNOW LOADING (EN1991-1-3) In accordance with EN1991-1-3:2003 incorporating corrigenda dated December 2004 and March 2009 and the UK national annex incorporating Corrigendum No.1 TEDDS calculation version 1.0.03 Characteristic ground snow load Location; Bournemouth Site altitude above sea level (user modified value); A = 22 m Zone number; Z = 2.0 Density of snow; γ = 2.00 kn/m 3 Characteristic ground snow load; s k = ((0.15 + (0.1 Z + 0.05)) + ((A - 100m) / 525m)) 1kN/m 2 = 0.25 kn/m 2 Exposure coefficient (Normal); C e = 1.0 Thermal coefficient; C t = 1.0 Building details Roof type; Width of roof (left on elevation); Width of roof (right on elevation); Slope of roof (left on elevation); Slope of roof (right on elevation); Duopitch b 1 = 4.48 m b 2 = 4.48 m α 1 = 32.00 deg α 2 = 32.00 deg Shape coefficients Shape coefficient roof (Table 5.2); µ 1_α1_T52 = 0.75 Shape coefficient roof (Table 5.2); µ 1_α2_T52 = 0.75 Shape coefficient roof (Table UK NA.1); µ 1_α1_NA1 = 1.12 Shape coefficient roof (Table UK NA.1); µ 1_α2_NA1 = 1.12 Loadcase 1 Table 5.2 Loading to roof 1 (LHS); s 1_1 = µ 1_α1_T52 C e C t s k = 0.19 kn/m 2 Loading to roof 2 (RHS); s 2_1 = µ 1_α2_T52 C e C t s k = 0.19 kn/m 2 Loadcase2 UK NA1 Loading to roof 1 (LHS); s 1_2 = 0 C e C t s k = 0.00 kn/m 2 Loading to roof 2 (RHS); s 2_2 = µ 1_α2_NA1 C e C t s k = 0.28 kn/m 2 Loadcase3 UK NA.1 Loading to roof 1 (LHS); s 1_3 = µ 1_α1_NA1 C e C t s k = 0.28 kn/m 2 Loading to roof 2 (RHS); s 2_3 = 0 C e C t s k = 0.00 kn/m 2 Page 11 of 12

3. JUSTIFICATION OF PANELS FOR UPLIFT LOADINGS From the TEDDS calcs we see that the panels should ideally be placed within Zone H Given that the panel fixings will transfer the load into the existing roof and the roof was originally designed for this wind load, no strengthening works will be required to the roof structure. To calculate the actual wind uplift on the solar array we refer to BRE Digest 489 revised & EN 1991-1 From our calculations above we know that q (Peak Velocity Pressure) = 0.70kN/m2 see page 5 and where a module is less than 0.3m from the roof surface the Wind Uplift Net Pressure Coefficients for the panels in the centre of the roof is -1.3 With a safety Factor of 1.35 0.70 x (-1.3) x 1.35 = -1.22 kn/m2 all roof fixings must be able to withstand this uplift 4. CONCLUSIONS From the TEDDS calcs and the fixing calculations we see that the proposed solar panels can safely be fixed to the existing roof structure with no strengthening works being required. The roof fixings should follow the manufacturer s guidelines. Page 12 of 12