Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Similar documents
PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

Long Baseline Neutrinos

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

K2K and T2K experiments

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Search for sterile neutrino mixing in the muon neutrino to tau neutrino appearance channel with the OPERA detector

Leïla Haegel University of Geneva

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

Physics of Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. in the near future

Neutrino Interaction Physics for Oscillation Analyses

Neutrino Cross Section Measurements for Long-Baseline Acceleratorbased Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 1 Oct 2015

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)068. The PINGU detector

Charged current single pion to quasi-elastic cross section ratio in MiniBooNE. Steven Linden PAVI09 25 June 2009

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2017

Neutrino Event Tagging Based On Nucleon Energy Spectra

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 May 2015

Final results from K2K and status of T2K

Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

T2K neutrino oscillation results

Atmospheric neutrinos with Super-Kamiokande S.Mine (University of California, Irvine) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Sinergie fra ricerche con neutrini da acceleratore e atmosferici

Mass hierarchy and CP violation with upgraded NOνA and T2K in light of large θ 13

Possible Interpretations of IceCube High Energy Neutrinos

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2009 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 11 : Neutrino Oscillations. Neutrino Experiments

Status and prospects of neutrino oscillations

Why understanding neutrino interactions is important for oscillation physics

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

Solar Neutrino Oscillations

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

Figure 1 Overview of the T2K experiment

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part I

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

1. Neutrino Oscillations

Solar and atmospheric ν s

A study on different configurations of Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment

PoS(NEUTEL2015)009. Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande. Masayuki Nakahata for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Future Experiments with Super Neutrino Beams

PHYS 5326 Lecture #6. 1. Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2. Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

Neutrino Oscillation Measurements, Past and Present. Art McDonald Queen s University And SNOLAB

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

JHFnu at J-PARC neutrino oscillation experiment

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

Eric Baussan IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Super-K Gd. M.Ikeda(ICRR) for Super-K collaboration Workshop for Neutrino Programs with facilities in Japan

Current status of T2K experiment

Model independent extraction of the axial mass parameter in CCQE anti neutrino-nucleon scattering

Particle Physics WS 2012/13 ( )

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

Overview of Reactor Neutrino

Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino cross sections for future oscillation experiments

SHiP: a new facility with a dedicated detector for neutrino physics

Neutrino interaction at K2K

PoS(CKM2016)117. Recent inclusive tt cross section measurements. Aruna Kumar Nayak

Neutrinos Induced Pion Production in MINERvA

Overview of the COMET Phase-I experiment

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

Transcription:

Recent Results from TK and Future Prospects Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration University of Rochester E-mail: kiwamoto@pas.rochester.edu The TK long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment has been running in anti-neutrino mode since and recently released anti-neutrino oscillation results. These results have been updated with further data and now include the full three-flavor anti-neutrino oscillation analysis. We will present these new results and compare them with the neutrino oscillation results, giving the most sensitive comparison to date. The three-flavor neutrino and anti-neutrino results are used to obtain world-leading measurements of δ CP, θ and m. The TK long-baseline neutrino experiment is in the process of proposing a follow-up experiment, TK-II, with higher beam intensity, upgraded detectors and improved sensitivity to neutrino properties. The anticipated sensitivity and reach of TK-II will be discussed in this talk, as well as possible detector upgrades. In particular, the sensitivity should allow for a σ discovery of CP violation in the case of maximum CP violation, after years of data-taking. PoS(ICHEP6)7 8th International Conference on High Energy Physics - August 6 Chicago, USA Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. International License (CC BY-NC-ND.). http://pos.sissa.it/

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration Neutrino oscillation is a quantum mechanical phenomenon that causes neutrino flavor to change periodically as it travels through space. It is caused by the mixing between the flavor states and mass eigenstates which is expressed in a form of Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix []. Neutrino oscillation probability is governed by the oscillation parameters, and the accelerator neutrino experiments utilize muon neutrino disappearance and electron neutrino appearance samples to measure the parameters. The disappearance probability can be expressed as functions of the mixing angle θ and mass difference term m, and as expressed in [], the appearance probability depends on θ and CP violation phase δ CP in addition to the previous parameters. While the oscillation probability of the muon neutrino disappearance is identical between the neutrino and anti-neutrino sectors in vacuum, they are different for the electron neutrino appearance due to the dependence on the CP odd phase sinδ CP. This fundamental property of the neutrino oscillation makes the comparison between the neutrino and anti-neutrino results important to measure the δ CP with high sensitivity. In addition, the oscillation probability has the dependence on the ratio between the distance and energy of the traveling neutrino. This dependence allows one to design the experiment with careful considerations of the neutrino energy, E, spectrum and the baseline distance, L, to maximize the occurrence of the oscillation. The configurations of the neutrino kinematics allow the experiments whether the matter effect [] on the neutrino oscillations to be negligible or not. The TK experiment has collected data to perform the three-flavor oscillation analyses considering both neutrino and anti-neutrino oscillation measurements with L = 9 km and average E =.6 GeV configurations. The recent TK oscillation analysis result rejects the CP conservation by 9% confidence level. Furthermore, the TK collaboration has a future prospect to perform upgrades in beam intensity, detector, and the analyses to collect sufficient data on the time scale of 6 to discover the CP violation with σ sensitivity.. Detector Design and Analysis Method TK (Tokai to Kamioka) [] is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment conducted in Japan that utilizes the concept of near and far detectors to measure the neutrino interactions before and after the oscillations, respectively. The muon neutrino beam is prepared at the J-PARC accelerator and beam line in Tokai by GeV proton beam generated by the primary beam line main ring (MR) directed to the graphite target. The secondary pions generated by this collision are collected and focused by the set of magnetic horns located in the secondary beam line. The alteration of the polarity of the magnetic horns allows to select positively or negatively charged pions which decay into neutrinos or anti-neutrinos, respectively, to run the beam in either neutrino or anti-neutrino modes. The beam is then profiled and studied prior to the oscillations by the near detector complex ND8, and the neutrino interactions after the oscillations are studied by monitoring the Cherenkov radiations originated from them at the Super-Kamiokande (SK) far detector [] in Kamioka, located 9 km away from Tokai. The collaboration was established to achieve two major physics goals by studying the neutrino beam with the near and the far detectors: ) to measure the oscillation parameters θ and δ CP by observing the neutrino oscillation from muon to electron neutrino (ν µ ν e ) and ) to make the precision measurements of θ and m from the ν µ disappearance from the beam. In order PoS(ICHEP6)7

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration to maximize the probability of the muon neutrino oscillation at SK far detector, TK uses the off-axis method to create a narrow-band neutrino beam which the energy peaks around.6 GeV. The ND8 measurements combined with the external experimental data provide the neutrino flux predictions and interaction cross section models to perform the sophisticated prediction of the event composition at the SK detector with constrained systematic uncertainties. The SK detector efficiency is evaluated using the control samples such as SK atmospheric neutrino data and π control samples. The TK oscillation analyses use measurements in both neutrino and anti-neutrino modes simultaneously to perform the full joint data fit. The maximal likelihood method is used to calculate the sets of best fit oscillation parameters with consideration of normal or inverted hierarchy. The likelihood calculations consider number of observed neutrino or anti-neutrino candidate events, shape of the kinematic distributions, and the systematic uncertainties that correspond to the samples interested (ν µ /ν µ disappearance or ν e /ν e appearance events) [6].. Statistical Update and Latest Analysis Results As of May 7, 6, the TK experiment has collected 7.8 and 7.7 protons on target (POT) in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes, respectively. Figure shows the summary of the POT accumulated by TK in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes and the corresponding beam power. Using the data set available, we performed three major studies. The full joint data fit is performed to calculate the best fit oscillation parameters δ CP, θ and m. The ν µ disappearance results in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes are compared to investigate the evidence of CPT violation or non-standard neutrino interactions; this study was performed with 7. and 7.7 POT in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes, respectively. In addition, we introduce the selection of additional ν e charged current (CC) resonance π + appearance sample in 7.8 POT in neutrino mode by modifying the current ν e appearance selection criteria.. Full Joint Fit Oscillation Analysis The full data set with neutrino and anti-neutrino samples are used to perform the oscillation parameter fits to measure δ CP, θ and m. Among the accumulated data set, we have obtained ν µ disappearance and ν e appearance candidate events in neutrino mode and 66 ν µ disappearance and ν e appearance candidate events in anti-neutrino mode samples. Figure shows the spectra of the reconstructed kinematic variables for each sample category. The comparisons between the best fit and the unoscillated predictions show the expected decreases in the event rates at the reconstructed energy peak at.6 MeV in both ν µ and ν µ disappearance samples. Data fit results of the disappearance parameters, θ and m, are shown on Figure. The TK fit result obtain sin θ =. +.6.68 (.+..66 ) and m =.+.8.8 (.+.8.8 ) ev with normal (inverted) mass hierarchy hypothesis. The TK best fit point and the confidence level contours for the disappearance parameters are compared with the external experimental results: IceCube, NOνa, MINOS+, and Super-K. The TK fit result prefers maximal θ mixing; however, despite the fact that they are in agreement within 68% and 9% confidence levels, it is worthwhile to emphasize that the shapes of the confidence level contours are significantly different between the TK and NOνA results. PoS(ICHEP6)7

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration 6 Figure : Summary of the POT accumulated by TK in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes and the corresponding beam power. The blue line shows the total accumulated POT for physics. Red and purple dots show the beam power in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes, respectively. CP violating phase δ CP is studied with the full joint fit analysis. Table shows the expected event rates of the ν e and ν e appearance samples for different δ CP values. Our simulations predict the enhancement and suppression of the appearance event rates in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes due to the CP odd phase sinδ CP. Figure shows the data fit results in δ CP sin θ space. The confidence level contours and the best fit points are calculated with and without the constraint on the sinθ region by the reactor experiment results (sin θ =.8 ±.). The TK-only result shows the consistent result with the reactor experiment measurements, with the preference on the maximally CP violated region at δ CP π. Sample δ CP = π δ CP = δ CP = + π δ CP = π Observed Normal Hierarchy Normal Hierarchy Normal Hierarchy Normal Hierarchy ν e 8.7. 9.6. ν e 6. 6.9 7.7 6.8 PoS(ICHEP6)7 Table : Comparison of the expected total number of events in each sample at different δ CP values and the observed candidates. The TK measurement of the δ CP confidence level is studied with the reactor constraint and compared with the simulations on Figure. The comparison of the expected sensitivities between the 7. (red) and 7.8 (black) POT in neutrino mode are shown to provide the effect of the improvement in the data fit with the extra statistics. The χ distributions have different π shapes with higher values at the peak at δ CP between the expected sensitivity and the measurement which arise from the fact that more (less) events are observed in data for ν e (ν e ) appearance sample. Since there is a physical boundary at δ CP = ± π, in order to properly evaluate the confidence interval of the δ CP, the critical χ values are calculated using Feldman-Cousins method [7]. The studies have shown that the δ CP = [.;.9] and [.9;.7] with 9% confidence level

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration Events/MeV Ratio Events/MeV Ratio 9 8 7 6 TK Run 7c preliminary Unoscillated Prediction Best Fit Data. 6 7 8.. 6 7 8 Reconstructed Energy [GeV] 8 6 Unoscillated Prediction Best Fit Data 6 8 TK Run 7c preliminary 6 8 Reconstructed Momentum [MeV/c] Events/MeV Ratio Events/MeV Ratio TK Run 7c preliminary Unoscillated Prediction Best Fit Data. 6 7 8.. 6 7 8 Reconstructed Energy [GeV].... TK Run 7c preliminary Unoscillated Prediction Best Fit Data 8 6 8 6 6 8 Reconstructed Momentum [MeV/c] Figure : Spectra of the reconstructed kinematic variables predicted with the unoscillated prediction (blue) and the best-fit oscillation parameters (red) and the event candidates from the data (black). Reconstructed neutrino energy spectrum is used for ν µ (top left) and ν µ (top right) disappearance samples and reconstructed lepton momentum spectrum is used for ν e (bottom left) and ν e (bottom right) appearance samples. The distributions under the spectra are the ratio between the best fit and unoscillated spectra. in normal and inverted hiearchy hypotheses, respectively. The TK measurement rejects the CP conservation in neutrino oscillation for both mass hierarchy hypotheses with 9% confidence level.. ν µ and ν µ Disappearance Comparison Since the ν µ and ν µ disappearance probabilities are identical at leading order (neglecting matter effects small for TK baseline) sin θ, inconsistent measurements in the oscillation parameters between the ν µ and ν µ disappearance analyses could be an evidence of the CPT violation or non-standard neutrino interactions. The CPT test is performed and shown on Figure 6 by comparing the sensitivities in m - sin θ space. The POT accumulation of 7. and 7.7 in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes, respectively, is used to perform the studies. and 66 candidates are observed in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes, respectively. With both hierarchy cases, the confidence level contours show good agreement between the ν µ and ν µ measurements. Therefore, no hint of CPT violation or non-standard neutrino interactions is observed. PoS(ICHEP6)7. Selection of Additional ν e CCπ + Appearance Sample The study is performed to investigate non-charge-current-quasielastic scattering (CCQE) signal events to increase the statistics available for the ν e appearance analysis. In particular, we introduce the selection of additional ν e CCπ + appearance sample by modifying the current ν e appearance selection criteria. As explained in [6], the current TK ν e appearance selection criteria

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration ) /c ev - ( m.6...8.6...8 68%CL 9%CL TK best-fit Normal Hierarchy IceCube NOvA (6) MINOS+ TK Run-7c preliminary Super-K.......6.6.7 sin θ Figure : Best fit point (black dot) and the confidence level contours (black lines) for m - sin θ space. External results from IceCube (yellow), NOνA (green), MINOS+ (red), and Super-K (blue) are shown for the comparison. (radians) δ CP - - TK Run-7c preliminary 68.7%CL 9%CL Best-fit PDG Normal Hierarchy Inverted Hierarchy Fixed Mass Hierarchy -...6.8. sin θ (radians) δ CP - - TK Run-7c preliminary 68.7%CL 9%CL Best-fit Normal Hierarchy Inverted Hierarchy Fixed Mass Hierarchy -..... sin θ Figure : Best fit point (dots) and the confidence level contours (lines) for δ CP - sin θ space. The best fit with the normal (black) and inverted (red) hierarchy hypotheses are shown separately. Left contours are calculated using only the TK data; the yellow shaded sin θ region shows the results obtained by the reactor experiment (sin θ =.8 ±.). Right contours are calculated with the TK data constrained by the reactor experiment results. PoS(ICHEP6)7 extract the event candidates with single-ring, electron-like Cherenkov pattern without the delayed detection of the decay electron according to the SK event reconstruction algorithm. They are designed to select ν e CCQE events as the main signal interaction mode. In order to investigate for the additional statistics, single-ring, electron-like events with one decay electron are selected and studied as the ν e CC resonance π + signal candidates. This way, we select π + interactions below the Cherenkov threshold with the pion that decays into muons which decays into the electrons. In the current ν e appearance analysis, the reconstructed neutrino energy is calculated consid-

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration -lnl 8 7 6 Run -7c - NH Run -7c - IH Run -7b - NH Run -7b - IH σ 9% CL TK Run-7c preliminary -lnl 8 6 TK Run-7c preliminary Normal Hierarchy Inverted Hierarchy (9% CL) -lnl crit (σ CL) -lnl crit - - - δ CP (radians) - - - δ CP (radians) Figure : D χ distributions as a function of δ cp obtained with the constraint on the sin θ with the reactor experiment results. The left distributions show the expected sensitivity improvement from the 7. (red) to 7.8 (black) POT in neutrino mode. The right distributions show the data fit result with critical χ values for 9% (blue) and σ (yellow) confidence levels obtained by the Feldman- Cousins method. ) (ev m or m.8.6...8.6.. TK Run-7 ν 9% CL TK Run-7 ν 9% CL TK Run-7 ν 68% CL TK Run-7 ν 68% CL NH.8.....6.7.8 sin θ or sin θ ) (ev or m m.8.6...8.6.. TK Run-7 ν 9% CL TK Run-7 ν 9% CL TK Run-7 ν 68% CL TK Run-7 ν 68% CL IH.8.....6.7.8 sin θ or sin θ Figure 6: Best fit points (dots) and the confidence level contours (lines) for m - sin θ space calculated with the ν µ (red) and ν µ (blue) disappearance fits performed separately. The left and right contours are obtained with the normal and inverted hierarchy hypotheses, respectively. This study was performed with 7. and 7.7 POT data in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes, respectively. PoS(ICHEP6)7 ering the elastic scattering from a nucleon in a potential well: E Rec ν e CCQE = (M n Vnuc) E e + M p (M n Vnuc) M e ((M n Vnuc) E e + p e cosθ e ) (.) where M p = proton mass, M n = neutron mass, M e = electron mass, V nuc = nuclear binding potential (7. MeV), E e = reconstructed electron energy, p e = reconstructed electron momentum, and θ e = angle between the beam and the electron. Since we consider the delta resonance decaying into pion, it is inaccurate to use the energy reconstruction stated above. While there are several methods to reconstruct the neutrino energy for ν e CCπ + interaction, we consider the energy reconstruction formula by identifying the outgoing baryon as a ++ resonance, instead of a proton, which is produced by the neutrino reaction on the 6

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration free protons in the SK water: E Rec ν e CC = M pe e + M ++ M p M e (M p E e + p e cosθ e ) (.) where M ++ = ++ resonance with fixed mass of. MeV/c. Table shows the expected number of events in the ν e CCπ + appearance sample with different δ CP values. Similarly with the ν e CCQE appearance sample, the enhancement and suppression of the event rates can be observed for different δ CP values. The prediction shows that the inclusion of ν e CCπ + sample introduces approximately % more events with an assumption of the maximal CP violation at δ cp = π. Figure 7 shows the expected and measured event candidates of the ν e CCπ + appearance selection. Number of ν e candidates observed in 7.8 POT in neutrino mode are binned as a function of number of decay electron to provide the comparison between the ν e CCQE and ν e CCπ + selections; ν e CCπ + candidates are observed. The reconstructed neutrino energy spectrum of the ν e CCπ + sample is studied as well; despite the fact that the statistics is low in this sample category, the distributions of the ν e CCπ + candidates agree with the predicted number of event candidates and the spectrum. The oscillation analysis with inclusion of the ν e CCπ + sample is in progress. Sample δ CP = π δ CP = δ CP = + π δ CP = π Observed Normal Hierarchy Normal Hierarchy Normal Hierarchy Normal Hierarchy ν e CCπ +..8..7 Table : Comparison of the expected total number of events in ν e CCπ + sample at different δ CP values and the observed candidates. Number of events RUN 7 data (7.8 POT) Osc. ν e CC Osc. ν e CC ν µ /ν µ CC Beam ν e /ν e CC NC TK Run 7c preliminary Number of events RUN 7 data (7.8 POT) Osc. ν e CC Osc. ν e CC ν µ /ν µ CC Beam ν e /ν e CC NC TK Run 7c preliminary PoS(ICHEP6)7 6 Number of decay e Reconstructed ν energy (MeV) Figure 7: Expected (histograms) and measured (black dots) event candidates of the ν e appearance selections. The left distribution shows the number of ν e CCπ and ν e CCπ + candidates as a function of number of decay electrons. The right distribution shows the reconstructed neutrino energy spectrum of the ν e CCπ + sample. 7

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration. A Proposed Extension of the TK Experiment As of August 6, TK is approved to continue the run to accumulate 7.8 POT, which is expected around. The TK collaboration proposes further extension of the TK run to 6 called TK-II, which anticipates collect sufficient statistics to discover CP violation with sensitivity greater than σ if the δ CP is maximally violated. Figure 8 shows the expected J-PARC MR beam power and the POT accumulation up to 6 Japanese Fiscal Year (JFY). In order to accumulate the expected POT of by 6 JFY, the accelerator and MR beam power need to be upgraded to reach. MW from the current beam power of kw. Various aspects of the TK experiment need to be upgraded accordingly as well. Increase in an effective POT by % due to the upgrades such as the electromagnetic horn current upgrade from present ka to ka, the near detector upgrade, and the analysis improvement are stated [8]. MR Beam Power [kw] 8 6 J PARC MR Expected Performance MR Power Supply upgrade 6 7 8 9 6 7 JFY POT] Integrated Delivered Protons [........ POT] Delivered Protons / Period [ PoS(ICHEP6)7 Figure 8: Expected J-PARC MR beam power and the POT accumulation as a function of calendar year. Figure 9 shows examples of the sensitivity improvement anticipated by the full TK-II exposure of POT. Expected sensitivities to δ CP with known and unknown mass hierarchy and m sin θ space assuming θ at lower octant (sin θ =.) are studied with the TK systematic errors from 6. The sensitivities with the currently approved 7.8 POT exposure are prepared as the comparisons. The full TK-II exposure achieve greater than σ sensitivity to δ CP and precise measurement of θ with resolution of.7 o.. Conclusion The TK collaboration has obtained the measurements of δ CP, θ and m by based on the three-flavor neutrino and anti-neutrino oscillation results. The full data set of 7.8 8

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration to exclude sinδ CP = χ x POT w/ eff. stat. improvements (no sys. errors) x POT w/ eff. stat. improvements & 6 sys. errors 7.8x POT (no sys. errors) 7.8x POT w/ 6 sys. errors. to exclude sinδ CP = χ x POT w/ eff. stat. improvements (no sys. errors) x POT w/ eff. stat. improvements & 6 sys. errors 7.8x POT (no sys. errors) 7.8x POT w/ 6 sys. errors. True δ CP ( ) True δ CP ( ) m.8.6.. POT by, 9% C.L 7.8x x POT, 9% C.L POT w/improvement, 9% C.L...6 sin θ Stat. only Systematics Figure 9: Sensitivity studies performed with the expected POT exposure of TK-II with 6 TK systematic errors. Top distributions show the sensitivity to δ CP assuming the known (left) and unknown (right) mass hierarchies. The bottom contour shows the sensitivity to m - sin θ space assuming true sin θ =.. and 7.7 POT in neutrino and anti-neutrino modes, respectively, is collected by May 7, 6. The TK measurements are consistent with maximal θ mixing and maximal CP violating phase at δ CP π in normal hierarchy. The δ CP result rejects the CP conservation at 9% confidence level in both normal and inverted hierarchy hypotheses: δ CP = [.;.9] (normal) and [.9;.7] (inverted). The comparison between the neutrino and anti-neutrino results shows no hint of CPT violation or non-standard neutrino interactions. The non-ccqe signal events with a decay electron are investigated as a new sample set and studied to increase the statistics available for the ν e appearance analysis; the oscillation analysis with inclusion of such sample is in progress. The proposal of TK-II to extend the TK run to 6 is expected to achieve the full exposure of POT. Upgrades of the beam line, detectors, and analyses are required accomplish to reach this expectation with effective statistical increase by %. The TK-II sensitivity allows greater than σ sensitivity to discover CP violation in the case of maximum CP violation. PoS(ICHEP6)7 References [] Z. Maki., M. Nakagawa, S. Sakata. Remarks on the Unified Model of Elementary Particles. Progress of Theoretical Physics 8 (96) 87. [] M. Freund. Analytic Approximations for Three Neutrino Oscillation Parameters and Probabilities in Matter. Phys. Rev. D 6 (). [] L. Wolfenstein. Neutrino Oscillations in Matter. Phys. Rev. D 7 (978) 69. [] TK Collaboration. The TK Experiment. 8 Jun. arxiv:6.8v. 9

TK Summer 6 Results Konosuke Iwamoto, on behalf of the TK Collaboration [] S. Fukuda, et. al. The Super-Kamiokande detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A (April ) 8-6. doi:.6/s68-9()-x. [6] TK Collaboration. Measurements of neutrino oscillation in appearance and disappearance channels by the TK experiment with 6.6E protons on target. Feb. arxiv:.v. [7] G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins. Unified Approach to the Classical Statistical Analysis of Small Signals. Phys. Rev. D 7, 87 (998). [8] K. Abe et al.proposal for an Extended Run of TK to POT. arxiv:69. [hep-ex]. PoS(ICHEP6)7