PoS(Kruger 2010)048. B X s/d γ and B X s/d l + l. Martino Margoni SLAC-PUB Universita di Padova and INFN

Similar documents
Discovery searches for light new physics with BaBar

New Physics search in penguin B-decays

Inclusive radiative electroweak penguin decays:

RESULTS FROM B-FACTORIES

LHCb Semileptonic Asymmetry

Searches for Leptonic Decays of the B-meson at BaBar

SUSY-related Lepton and Hadron Flavor Results from Belle Yutaro Sato

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Rare B decays at CMS

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 7 Jul 2016

Identification of the Higgs boson produced in association with top quark pairs in proton-proton

V cb. Determination of. and related results from BABAR. Masahiro Morii, Harvard University on behalf of the BABAR Collaboration

Recent Results on Rare B Decays from BaBar and Belle

Measurement of Properties of Electroweak Bosons with the DØ Detector

VBF SM Higgs boson searches with ATLAS

Results on top physics by CMS

Semileptonic B decays at BABAR

Measurement of t-channel single top quark production in pp collisions

Recent BaBar results on CP Violation in B decays

Highlights of top quark measurements in hadronic final states at ATLAS

Recent Results from BaBar

Recent results from rare decays

Two Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)662. Charm physics prospects at Belle II

Search for H ± and H ±± to other states than τ had ν in ATLAS

W, Z and top production measurements at LHCb

Radiative and Electroweak Penguin Decays of B Mesons

Results from B-Physics (LHCb, BELLE)

PoS(FPCP2009)013. Fabrizio Scuri I.N.F.N. - Sezione di Pisa - Italy

PoS(CHARM2016)074. Searches for CPV in D + decays at LHCb

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Overview of the Higgs boson property studies at the LHC

D semi-leptonic and leptonic decays at BESIII

Top, electroweak and recent results from CDF and combinations from the Tevatron

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 15 May 2017

Studies of D ( ) Production in B Decays and e + e c c Events

Rare Hadronic B Decays

PoS(FPCP 2010)017. Baryonic B Decays. Jing-Ge Shiu SLAC-PUB National Taiwan University, Taiwan

Higgs Searches at CMS

Study of e + e annihilation to hadrons at low energies at BABAR

Rare decays at LHCb Siim Tolk (NIKHEF, Amsterdam) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

PoS(KAON)049. Testing the µ e universality with K ± l ± ν decays

Rencontres de Moriond - EW Interactions and Unified Theories La Thuile, March 14-21, 2015

Beyond the Standard Model searches with top quarks at D0

Recent Results on Radiative and Electroweak Penguin B Decays at Belle. Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)

Experimental Status and Expectations Regarding Radiative Penguin Decays

Production cross sections of strange and charmed baryons at Belle

Radiative penguins at hadron machines. Kevin Stenson! University of Colorado!

arxiv: v3 [hep-ex] 11 Feb 2013

Measurement of the CKM Sides at the B-Factories

Stephen R. Armstrong CERN EP Division CH-1211 Geneva 23, SWITZERLAND

Studies of b b gluon and c c vertices Λ. Abstract

PoS(ICHEP2012)238. Search for B 0 s µ + µ and other exclusive B decays with the ATLAS detector. Paolo Iengo

Results on Searches for New Physics at B Factories

A. J. Schwartz Physics Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio USA

Top results from CMS

PoS(CKM2016)087. Measurements of m d,s and Γ d at LHCb. Stefania Vecchi INFN, Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

B Mixing and Lifetime Measurements with the BABAR Detector.

Search for top squark pair production and decay in four bodies, with two leptons in the final state, at the ATLAS Experiment with LHC Run2 data

Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Dilepton Forward-Backward Asymmetry and electroweak mixing angle at ATLAS and CMS

Boosted top quarks in the ttbar dilepton channel: optimization of the lepton selection

arxiv: v2 [hep-ex] 8 Aug 2013

Top quark pair properties in the production and decays of t t events at ATLAS

b hadron properties and decays (ATLAS)

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

PoS(CKM2016)117. Recent inclusive tt cross section measurements. Aruna Kumar Nayak

Measurement of the Z ττ cross-section in the semileptonic channel in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Rare decays of beauty mesons

Danny van Dyk. B Workshop Neckarzimmern February 19th, Danny van Dyk (TU Dortmund) News on B K µ + µ 1 / 35

Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories

Rare beauty and charm decays at LHCb

PoS(ICHEP2012)300. Electroweak boson production at LHCb

Measurements of Leptonic B Decays from BaBar

IFAE 2003 Lecce. Alessio Sarti University and INFN Ferrara. BaBar CLEO. Motivation. Inclusive V ub Exclusive V ub Summary, Outlook and Conclusions

Measurements of charm and beauty proton structure functions F2 c c and F2 b b at HERA

Rare B decay searches with BABAR using hadronic tag reconstruction

PoS(CORFU2016)060. First Results on Higgs to WW at s=13 TeV with CMS detector

IFAE 2003 Lecce. Alessio Sarti University and INFN Ferrara. BaBar CLEO. Motivation. Inclusive V ub Exclusive V ub Summary, Outlook and Conclusions

CP Violation in B Decays and the CKM Matrix. Emmanuel Olaiya Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton,Didcot,Oxon,OX11 0QX,UK

Nicolas Berger SLAC, Menlo Park, California, U.S.A.

Search for non-standard and rare decays of the Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector

PoS(EPS-HEP 2009)057. Bottomonium Studies at BaBar. Veronique Ziegler. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

How well do we know the Unitarity Triangle? An experimental review

Review of Higgs results at LHC (ATLAS and CMS results)

Production of multiple electroweak bosons at CMS

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 28 Aug 2017

Lepton Violation Studies and Rare Radiative Decays in BaBar. John M. LoSecco, Notre Dame. for the BaBar Collaboration. Miami 06, December 2006

The Future of V ub. Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1

KEKB collider and Belle detector

PoS(Kruger 2010)034. CMS searches for new physics. Mara Senghi Soares On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.

V ub measurements with the BaBar detector

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 Sep 2015

PoS(ICHEP2012)194. Measurements of the t t forward-backward asymmetry at CDF. Christopher Hays

Higgs and Z τ + τ in CMS

Single top quark production at CDF

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)215. WW, WZ, and ZZ production at CMS. Jordi DUARTE CAMPDERROS (on behalf of CMS collaboration)

PoS(KAON13)012. R K Measurement with NA62 at CERN SPS. Giuseppe Ruggiero. CERN

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 23 Jul 2013

Transcription:

SLAC-PUB-15491 B X s/d γ and B X s/d l + l Universita di Padova and INFN E-mail: martino.margoni@pd.infn.it Flavour Changing Neutral Current transitions B X s/d γ and B X s/d l + l provide an excellent laboratory for the search for physics beyond the Standard Model and for the study of the dynamics of b-quark inside B mesons. B X s/d γ and B X s/d l + l decays are selected from the samples of events collected by the BaBar, Belle and CDF detectors by means of several strategies. Standard Model tests are performed through measurements of inclusive BR(B X s/d γ), BR(B X s/d l + l ), CP and isospin asymmetries, and the study of the relevant angular distributions in B X s/d l + l decays. A V td /V ts measurement with reduced theoretical uncertainties is obtained from the branching fraction ratio BR(b dγ)/br(b sγ). The most precise V cb determination is extracted by global fits to the moments of inclusive distributions in B X c lν and B X s γ using the kinetic mass scheme. Uncertainties on shape functions in the measurement of V ub using inclusive semileptonic decays B X u lν are limited by comparing the partial rates for B X u lν and B X s γ in restricted phase space regions. Kruger 2010: Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC December 5-10, 2010 Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa Speaker. On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Work supported in part by US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025

1. Introduction In the Standard Model, Flavour Changing Neutral Current transitions B X s/d γ occur via oneloop radiative penguin diagrams. Recent NNLL order computations give BR(b sγ) = (3.15 ± 0.23) 10 4 [1] for photons with Eγ>1.6 GeV in the B meson rest frame. Contributions from non Standard Model heavy particles in the loop can cause a sizeable deviation from the predicted rate. New physics can also significantly enhance the direct CP asymmetry for b sγ and b dγ decays which is 10 6 in the Standard Model [2]. The ratio V td /V ts can be obtained both from the B d and B s mixing frequencies and from the study of the B X s/d γ transitions. A measurement of the branching fractions of inclusive b dγ relative to b sγ provides V td /V ts with reduced theoretical uncertainties compared to that from the exclusive modes B (ρ,ω)γ and B K γ. It is important to confirm the consistency of the mixing and radiative decays measurements, since new physics effects would enter in different ways in the two processes. Due to the universality of the b-quark motion inside B mesons, the moments of the photon spectrum in B X s γ decays are used to determine the Heavy Quark Expansion parameters related to the mass and momentum of the b-quark within the B meson. These parameters are useful to reduce the error in the determination of the CKM matrix elements V cb and V ub from the inclusive B X c,u lν decays [3], [4]. The lowest order Standard Model processes contributing to B X s/d l + l are W + W box and radiative photon or Z penguin diagrams. Their amplitudes are expressed using Operator Product Expansion in terms of hadronic form factors [5], and effective Wilson coefficients [6]. New particles in the loop could modify the Standard Model Wilson coefficients or introduce additional ones. The lepton forward-backward asymmetry, CP and isospin asymmetry, and the differential branching fraction in the decays B X s/d l + l as functions of the dilepton invariant mass differ from the Standard Model expectations in various extended models [7]. 2. B X s/d γ Measurements 2.1 Inclusive B X s γ Belle Analysis From 605 fb 1 of data collected at the ϒ(4S) resonance, events with a high energy isolated photon are selected [8]. Photons from π 0 and η decays are rejected exploiting informations about the electromagnetic shower profile, the two photons invariant mass and the photon angular distribution. The residual π 0 /η B B background is estimated using data-corrected Monte Carlo samples and subtracted. The dominant background from continuum events is suppressed by means of two analysis streams, based respectively on a lepton tag and on energy flow and event shape variables. The residual amount of continuum background is subtracted using off-resonance data corrected for energy effects. The B meson is not reconstructed, therefore the B X d γ contribution is finally subtracted assuming BR(B X d γ)/br(b X s γ) = 4.5%. In the photon energy range from 1.7 to 2.8 GeV, as measured in the B meson rest frame, the partial branching fraction BR(B X s γ) = (3.45 ± 0.15(stat) ± 0.40(syst)) 10 4 is measured, where the systematic errors are dominated by the continuum and B B background subtraction. 2

2.2 Preliminary BaBar B X s+d γ Lepton Tag Analysis From 347 fb 1 of data, events with an energetic photon are selected. Continuum background is suppressed using a lepton tag and a neural network exploiting topological event variables. B B background from π 0 /η,ω, electrons, anti-neutrons and final state radiation is estimated using simulation and data control samples and then subtracted. In the photon energy range from 2.1 and 2.8 GeV the CP asymmetry A CP (B X s+d γ) = Γ( B X s+d γ) Γ(B X s+d γ) = 0.056 ± 0.060(stat) ± 0.018(syst) Γ( B X s+d γ)+γ(b X s+d γ) is determined, where the B meson flavour is inferred from the lepton charge, taking into account the dilution due to mixing, cascade decays and fake leptons. This is the most precise measurement up-to-date, consistent with the Standard Model expectations. The statistical and systematic errors are dominated respectively by the continuum subtraction and the lepton tag asymmetry measured in data control samples. 2.3 Summary of BR(b sγ) Measurements The Heavy Flavour Averaging Group average of the inclusive BR(b sγ) measurements for the summer 2010 conferences is BR(b sγ) = (3.55 ± 0.24(stat) ± 0.09(syst)) 10 4 [9], in marginal agreement with the NNLL order theoretical prediction BR(b sγ) = (3.15 ± 0.23) 10 4 [1]. Recent calculations in the 2Higgs-Doublet-Model framework provide constraints on the coupling of the second and third generation fermions to the charged Higgs boson obtained from BR(b sγ) together with other flavour physics experimental results. From these calculations, the current tanβ independent best limit on the charged Higgs mass M H +>300 GeV/c 2 at 95% CL is obtained [10]. 2.4 BaBar V td /V ts Measurement From 423 fb 1 of data, b X d γ and b X s γ inclusive rates are extrapolated from the sum of seven exclusive fully reconstructed modes with a high energy isolated photon [11]. The same kinematical cuts are applied to X s and X d states in order to reduce the systematics in the ratio of branching ratios. The dominant background from continuum is suppressed by means of a neural network using event shape variables. The contribution due to the missing states is estimated using Jetset Monte Carlo fragmentation models [12] corrected taking into account several measured exclusive decay modes [13]. In the hadronic mass region 0.5 GeV/c 2 <M(X s/d )<2.0 GeV/c 2 the branching ratios measurements BR(b sγ) = (230 ± 8(stat) ± 30(syst)) 10 6 and BR(b dγ) = (9.2 ± 2.0(stat) ± 2.3(syst)) 10 6 are obtained. The unmeasured region M(X s/d )>2.0 GeV/c 2 is extrapolated using the spectral shape from the Kagan-Neubert model [14]. Conversion of the ratio of inclusive branching fractions to the ratio V td /V ts is done according to [15] giving V td /V ts = 0.199±0.022(stat)± 0.024(syst) ± 0.002(th) where the systematic errors are dominated by the extrapolation to the inclusive rates. The theoretical error is strongly reduced compared to that from exclusive modes. 2.5 B sγ Spectral Moments The determination of V cb from the inclusive semileptonic decay B X c lν using Heavy Quark Effective Theory and Operator Product Expansion requires the non-perturbative parameters m b and µ 2 π, representing the mass and the kinetic expectation value of the b-quark inside the B meson. 3

Combined fits in the kinetic mass scheme to the moments of the lepton momentum spectrum in B X c lν decays and of the photon energy spectrum in B sγ decays provide the currently most precise V cb measurement V cb = (41.85 ± 0.73) 10 3 [16]. The determination of V ub from the semileptonic branching ratio BR(B X u lν) requires shape functions to extrapolate the inclusive rate from the partial decay rates measured in restricted phase space regions with low background from B X c lν. Due to the universality of b-quark motion inside B mesons, uncertainties on shape function are limited by comparing the partial rates for B X u lν and B X s γ. 3. B X s/d l + l Measurements 3.1 Belle B K ( ) l + l Analysis From 605 fb 1 of data, B K ( ) l + l (with l=e or µ) events are fully reconstructed in ten different final states [17]. The dominant background from continuum is suppressed exploiting event shape variables. Semileptonic B Xlν decays are rejected by means of event shape, missing mass and lepton requirements. From the event yields in six q 2 = m 2 l + l bins, the differential branching fraction dbr(b K( ) l + l ) is computed and compared to Standard Model predictions obtained using dq 2 different assumpions on the decay form factors [18]. Figure 1 (left) shows the differential branching ratio separately for K l + l and Kl + l final states. Figure 1: Differential branching ratios for the (a) K l + l and (b) Kl + l modes as a function of q 2. The two shaded regions are veto windows to reject JΨ(Ψ )X events. The solid curves show the Standard Model theoretical predictions using different assumptions for the decay form factors. (c) and (d) show the fit results for F L and A FB in K l + l together with the solid (dotted) curve representing the Standard Model (C 7 = C7 SM ) prediction. The measured inclusive branching ratios BR(B K l + l ) = (10.7± 1.1 1.0 ±0.9) 10 7, BR(B Kl + l ) = (4.8 ± 0.5 0.4 ±0.3) 10 7, CP asymmetry A CP = N(B K( ) l + l ) N( B K ( ) l + l ) and isospin N(B K ( ) l + l )+N( B K ( ) l + l ) asymmetry A I = (τ B +/τ B 0 )BR(K ( )0 l + l ) BR(K ( )± l + l ) agree with the Standard Model expectations. (τ B +/τ B 0)BR(K ( )0 l + l )+BR(K ( )± l + l ) Systematic errors are dominated by tracking, particle identification and Monte Carlo decay models. 4

The event angular distribution depends on three angles defined in figure 2. The K longitudinal polarizarion fraction F L and the forward-backward asymmetry A FB are extracted from fits to cosθ K and cosθ l distributions, dn d cosθ K 3 2 F L cos 2 θ K + 3 4 (1 F L)(1 cos 2 θ K ) and dn d cosθ l 3 4 F L(1 cos 2 θ l ) + 3 8 (1 F L)(1 + cos 2 θ l ) + A FB cosθ l, respectively. These quantites are sensitive to a sign-flip of the C 7 Wilson coefficient. Figure 1 (right) shows F L and A FB together with the Standard Model predictions for the two possible signs of C 7. Figure 2: Definition of the relevant angles for the F L and A FB determination. 3.2 Preliminary CDF B Kµ + µ Analysis From 4.4 fb 1 of data, B K ( ) µ + µ events are fully reconstructed [19]. A dimuon trigger is applied exploiting lepton transverse momentum and µ + µ vertex informations. Signal events are selected using a neural network by means of event shape variables, vertex quality and lepton separation. In order to reduce the systematic error due to the efficiency estimation, the B Kµ + µ branching ratio is computed relative to B J/ΨK ( ) which has identical final states. Results consistent with Standard Model expectations are obtained for inclusive and differential branching ratios, F L and A FB. The systematic errors are dominated by the combinatorial background description and BR(B J/ΨK ( ) ). 3.3 Preliminary BaBar B + K + τ + τ Analysis In some Standard Model extensions, such as NMSSM [20] the new physics couples proportionally to the mass squared of the decay products. In addition, the inclusive B X s τ + τ branching ratio is expected to be comparable to BR(B X s l + l ) (with l=e or µ) in the high q 2 region and the exclusive B + K + τ + τ transition is predicted to cover about 50% of the total inclusive rate. These arguments make the B + K + τ + τ decay mode an important topic to be studied. From 423 fb 1 of data, the BaBar Collaboration performs the first search for B + K + τ + τ on the recoil of fully reconstructed B D ( ) X decays. The dominant background from continuum events is suppressed exploiting the opening angle between the reconstructed B thrust and the rest-of-event thrust. Only one-prong τ e(µ)νν, πν decays are reconstructed and di-tau candidates are selected in the three charged tracks topology. Background events are rejected based on 5

missing energy and other kinematical quantities. From the 47 events surviving the cuts (with 65 expected from known backgrounds), the upper limit is obtained BR(B + K + τ + τ ) < 2.2 10 3 at 90% CL. The dominant systematic errors are due to the signal efficiency computation and the background description. 4. Conclusions The study of radiative penguin decays provides an excellent chance to search for new physics and to study the dynamic of b-quark inside B mesons. Almost all the results are in agreement with the expectations. In the future, the study of B X s/d γ and B X s/d l + l transitions will offer the opportunity to improve the experimental techniques by using new angular observables with reduced dependence on form factors (e.g. Transversity Amplitudes) [21], perform very stringent Standard Model tests and, hopefully, to discover or to understand new physics. References [1] Misiak et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 022002. [2] Hurt et al., hep-ph 0312260; hep-ph 0103331. [3] Gambino et al., Eur. Phys. C 34, 181-189; Benson et al., Nucl. Phys. B 710, 371-401. [4] Neubert et al., Phys. Rev. D 49, 4623-4633, Leibovich et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 053006; Lange et al., JHEP10, 084. [5] Bharucha et al., arxiv:1004.3249. [6] Ali et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 074024; Z. Phys. C 67, 417. [7] Kruger et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 114028; Phys. Rev. D 63, 019901(E); Aliev et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 265; Hou et al., Phys. Rev. D 77, 014016. [8] The Belle Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 241801. [9] The Heavy Flavour Averaging Group, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/rare/ichep10/radll/btosg.pdf. [10] Mahmoudi et al., Phys. Rev. D 81, 035016. [11] The BaBar Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 82, 051101. [12] T. Sjostrand, Comput. Phys. Commun. 82, 74. [13] The BaBar Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 72, 052005. [14] Kagan and Neubert, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094012. [15] Ali et al., Phys. Lett. B 429, 87. [16] The Heavy Flavour Averaging Group, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/semi/endofyear09/gbl_fits/kinetic/index.html. [17] The Belle Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 171801. [18] Ali et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 074024; Phys. Rev. D 66, 034002. [19] The CDF Collaboration, CDF Note 10047. [20] Hiller and Gudrun, Phys. Rev. D 70, 034018. [21] Bobeth et al., arxiv:1006.5013. 6