TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.

Similar documents
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

Background and Assumptions

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Background & Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions

UNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch

UNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area

PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets

Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.

UNIT CWT TON LBS. ACRE APPL APPL APPL ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. ACRE HOUR CWT*

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone

'f^ CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY

COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS

COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009

Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms

EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County

TRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide

F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e

EXTENDING A PLANT PRODUCTION MODEL WITH A VIEW TO PLANNING MONTHLY CASH-FLOW BALANCE, HIRED MACHINERY AND LABOUR COSTS

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County

/*^^_>r ORANGES. PURCHASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT

Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms

PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.

Partial budgets for cover crops in Midwest row crop farming

HARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS

2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst

Projections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.

Agricultural land-use from space. David Pairman and Heather North

T I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS

TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau

U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Corn Basis Information By Tennessee Crop Reporting District

. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO

The Talking Farm Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016

Transcription:

r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment of local produc ers, county Extension agents-agriculture, financial institution representatives, farm machinery dealers and others knowledgeable of the area. Variation in yields, production inputs and production prac tices should be expected for particular farms. Budgets for all major crops produced in the area are included for two levels of management, when applicable. Crop yields are directly related to levels of management. These differences are due largely to timing of operational practices which may not be evident in the budgets. The machinery inventory is applicable to both typical and high level management. In some bud gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. Budgets for establishing permanent type pasture grasses were prepared and used for prorating estab lishment costs in the respective pasture and hay budgets. Forage crops include expenses only be cause it is expected that the income will be derived from livestock enterprises. Land charges were based on the customary land lord's crop share less his proportionate share of certain production and harvesting inputs and a per centage of fixed cost on the irrigation system when applicable. A per land charge was made when crop share was not used. r

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I REGION Assumed Prices Paid and Received by Farmers _]_/ tern Unit Price Prices paid (1976) Seed Grain Sorghum Soybean Wheat (cleaned and treated) Alfalfa C o r n ( f o r g r a i n ) Corn (for si I age) Forage Sorghum Sugar Beets Custom rates Combining soybeans Combining wheat (dryland) Combining wheat (irrigated) Combining grain sorghum ( dryland) Combining grain sorghum (irrigated) Sugar beets ( harvest and haul) Hay harvest, Swath, bale, haul Corn (harvest and haul) Drying corn Hauling Grain sorghum Soybeans Wheat Chemical spraying (aerial) Fuel and lubricants Gasoli ne L.P. gas Diesel fuel M o t o r o i l ( h e a v y d u t y, d e t e r g e n t F e r t i I i z e r ( b u l k ) Nitrogen (anhydrous) Nitrogen (granular) Phosphorous L a b o r ( e x c e p t h o e i n g ) ^ Labor ( hoeing) bu. ton bale bu. bu. bu. bu. gal gal gal gal lb. lb. lb. hour hour 40.00 10.00 7.00 175.00 95.00 75.00 32.00 60.00 12.00 7.50 12.00 7.50.30 3.00.60.50.10.20.20.15 2.50.40.35.40 2.40. 16.30.30 2.75 2.25

-2- I tern Unit Price Chemicals Pre-emergence herbicide Methyl parathion Ma lath Ion Land Lease (cash rent) HaiI insurance Wheat Corn Grain Sorghum Interest Capital Operating 5 gal gal. gal. 100 100 100 140.00 5.25 I I.00 50.00 8.00 8.00 8.00.08.10 Prices received (1976) Wheat Grain Sorghum Alfalfa hay (standing In field) Forage sorghum hay (baled) Ensilage ( corn) standing in field Pasture grazing Corn (grain) Soybeans Sugar beets (14 sugar) bu. 3.75 4.50 ton 40.00 ton 45.00 ton 15.00 lb. galn.20 bu. 2.70 bu. 5.00 ton 35.00 _/ These price assumptions are not to be interpreted as predicitons or prospective prices. ^

1 ) ^ TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I REGION Estimated Machinery and Equipment Cost Per Hour of Use Machinery Item and Size Purchase Price Estimated Years of Use Estimated Hours of Use Fixed Costs Per Hour Variable Co-: Per Hour Tractor - 100 HP Tractor - 85 HP Tractor - 45 HP Pickup - 1/2 ton Rolling cultivator - 20 feet Chisel - 13 feet Float - 7 feet Lister-planter - 20 feet Tandem disc - 13 feet Offset disc - 13 feet Grain drill - 16 feet Shredder - 13 feet Rod weeder - 20 feet Harrow - 16 feet Herb sprayer - 30 feet Tool bar - 24 feet Lister 6R - 20 feet 12,350 5 5000 2.43 4.28 9,410 8 6400 1.91 3.11 4,120 12 7200.95 1.93 5,100 3 2100 2.02 3.37 2,000 8 1600 1.72.94 940 8 1600.81.26 1,760 10 1000 2.73.71 2,120 8 1000 2.91 1.19 1,650 8 1600 1.42.45 2,350 8 1600 2.02.67 1,880 10 1200 2.42.68 1,650 8 1000 2.28.80 380 5 1200.35.14 350 12 1596.37.10 590 10 2000.45.13 235 12 2004.20.05 1,000 8 1600.86.27

CORN FOR GRAIN, SPRINKLER IRRIGATED, TEXAS HIGH PLAINS 1 RFG ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRF TYPICAL MANAGEMENT -4- UNIT PRICF OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUF OR COST GROSS RFCFIPTS CORN TOTAL FRCM PRODUCTION 2.70 125.00-111*20 337.5^ VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SEED FFRT{ 150-40-0) HERBICIDE INSFCTICIDF INSFCT. APPLI. IRRIGATION LA80R(TRACTOR ) LABOR(IRRIGATION) INTEREST CN OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST LBS. HCUR HOUR DOL. 0.95 37.20 6.75 5.50 2.50 3.36 4.23 39.20 2.75 2.75 0.10 25.00 2.38 3.00 38.32 23.75 3 7.20 6.75 5.50 2.50 3.36 4.23 39.20 6.54 3.25 2*22 S 1 4 1. 11 HARVEST COSTS CUSTOM COMBINE CUSTOM HAUL CUSTOM DRYING SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLF CCST 3. INCOME ABOVF VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS IRRIGATION LAND ( NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS 6. NET RETURNS 0.20 0.12 0.10 3.37 2.43 52.40 33.80 125.00 125.00 125.00 LAND CHARGE BASED ON 60 LESS 50 % OF IRRIGATION FIXED COSTS, 25.00 15.00 5 2. 5 0 1 9 3. 6 1 * 1 4 3. 8 9 3.37 2.43 52.40 22:22 * ^ 2. 0 1 * 285.62 5 1. 8 8 M A r H T V n M D E N T ^ To L S F i Z ~ Q R F G I C J N fi i I R I G - L E V E L 5 L A N D C L A S S 2 M G M T. C O D F _ M A C H. C O M P. I R I G. S Y S T E M J P R I C E V E C T. Q E Q U I P. C O M P. Q ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 9 * ~~ THE TFXl INPUT CAPOS STORED WITH THIS BUDGET AR F AS FOLLOWS: R F I X 0 0 3 3. 8 0 0 1. 0 0 0 END* 0 0 0.0 0.0 D AT E P R I N T E D : 1 2 / 0 3 / 7 5

-5- C fl R N F O P G R A I N, S P R I N K L E R I R R I G AT E D, T ^ X A S H I G H P I A I N S I R F G H l f ESTIMATED COSTS AND RFTURNS PER ACRI TYPICAL MANAGEMENT OPFRATION FUFLfOILi FIXED I T F M T I M E S L A B O R M A C H I N E L O B., R E P. C O S T S N O. D AT E O V E R H O U R S H O U R S P p R A C R F P ^ R A C R r SHREDDER OFFSET DISC ROLL IMG CULT. ROD WEFDFR LISTFP-PLANTER HFRB SPRAYER FrRT.APPLI,RENTD PTCKUP 1,53 JAN L.OO 0.245 0.163 0. 97 10 JAN 0. 1 J 0. 1 2 5 0. 1 0 0 0. 34 1,49 MAR 2.00 0.4 7! 0.319 1.85 10 MAR 0.10 0.125 0.100 0. 3 4 3,31 APR 0.181 0.121 J. 56 10 APR 3,55 MAY 1,45 MAY 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.146 0.0 93 0.231 0.154 0. 3 4 0.38 0.9 7 61 MAY 0.0 0.121 0.02 5,86 MAY 10 MAY 0.097 0.064 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.15 0.34 1 0 J U N E 0. 1 0 0. 1 2 5 0. 1 0 0 0.34 10 JULY 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 10 AUG 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 10 SFPT 0.10 _ 0.85 0.2 ) 1.57 0.2H 0.4 0.20 0.26 0.90 0.06 0.07 0. lo 0. 20 0. 20 0.20-2:22 TOTAI S 2.378 1.839 7.59 5.3! LAND CHARGE BASED ON 60 LFSS 50 % GF IRRIGATION FIXED COSTS BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 2 00 150 2 170 0 ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 9

( _ * r _ T Y r ^ F N T F R P K I S E Z 2 - A «E G I O N _ 1 I R I G. L E V E L 2 L A N D C L A S S 0 M G M T. C O D E 1-6- OOKN Fnp GRAIN. SPI I R R I G A T E D, T E X A S H I G H P L A I N S 1 R F G I O I E S T I M AT F D C O S T S A M D R ' F T U P N S P E R A C» E HIGH LEVL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R UNI T COST/UNIT QUANT ITY VALUE OR COST G R O S S R E C E I P T S F R O M C OR N TOTAl VAR I ATIE COSTS PRODUCTION PRFHARVFST SEEO F E R T ( 1 8 0-4 0-0 ) HE«8IC IDE INSFCTIC IDE INSECT. APPL I. IRRIGATION LABOR(TRACTOR MACHINFRY) LABOR! I PR IGATI 0M> INTEREST CN CP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST 2.70 I 4 0. 0 ^ LBS. ACRF HOUR HOUR DOL. 0. 5 43.60 6.75 5.50 2.50 3.35 3.8 7 47.04 2.7 5 2.75 O.IO 2 5.00 1.0 0 l.oo 1.0 0 l.oo 2.23 3.60 41.96 4 3 7 8. 0 0 23. 75 43.60 6. 75 5. 50 2.50 3.35 3.37 4 7.04 6.14 9. on _x2_ % 1 5 6. 5 9 HARVEST COSTS CUSTOM COMBINE CUSTOM HANI C U S TO M D RY I N G SUBTOTAL, TOTAL VARI ABIE COST HARVEST 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS IRP IGATIQN LAND (NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS 6. MET RFTURNS 0.20 0. I 2 0.10 3.34 2.21 6 2. 8 8 28.56 I 4 0.00 140.00 140.0 0 l.oo L A N D C H A R G E B A S F D O N * 6 0 L E S S 5 J * O F I R R I G A T I O N F I X F D C n S T S, " M A C H. C O M P. _ 1 I R I G. S Y S T E M 2 P R I C E V E C T. Q E Q U I P. C O M P. n -2 28.00 L6.80 5 8. 8 0 * 2 1 5. 3 9 1 6 2. 6 1 3.34 2.21 62.38 22*22 * 9 6. 9 P 3 1 2. 3 7 * 6 5. 6 3 T H E T F X I I N P U T C A P O S S T O R E D W I T H T H I S 3 U D G F T A R F A S F O L I O W S ' H F I X 0 0 2 8. 5 6 0 I. 0 0 0 END* 0 0 0.0 0.0 OATF PRINTED: 12/03/75

-7- C O R N F O R G R A I N, S P R I N K L E R I R R I G A T E D, T E X A S H I G H P L A I N S E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E P A C R F HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT I RFGinh FUEL, OIL, FIXED I TEM TIMFS LABOR MACHINE LUB., REP. COSTS OPERAT ION NO. DATE OVFR H OU R S HOURS PER ACRF PER AC.pf SHREDDFR 1,53 JAN L.OO 0.245 0. L63 r» 97 0. Rr> 10 JAN 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 0.20 OFFSET DISC 1,49 MAR 2.00 0.478 0.319 1.85 1.57 10 MAR 0.10 0. 125 0. LOO 0.34 0.20 ROLLING CULT. 3,31 APR J. 181 0. 121 J.56 0.48 10 APR 0.10 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0. 20 LI STER-PLANTFR 1,45 MAY 0.231 0. 154 0.97 O.00 HERB SPRAYFP 61 MAY 0. u 0. 121 0.02 0.06 FFRT.APPLI,RENTD 5,86 MAY 0.097 0.064 0. 15 0.07 10 MAY 0.10 0.12 5 0.100 0.34 0.20 PTCKUP 10 JUNF 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 0.20 10 JULY 0.10 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0.20 10 AUG 0.10 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0.20 10 SEPT 0.10 ia Z_ TOTALS 2.231 1. 741 7.21 5.^5 LAND CHARGE BASFD ON 60 LESS 50 % OF IRRIGATION FIXFD COSTS, BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER - 7 2 0 0 1 5 0 1 1 7 0 0 ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 9

CORN FOP GRAIN, FURROW IRRIGATE Dt TEXAS HIGH PLAINS L REGION FSTIMATFD COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRF TYPICAL MANAGEMENT -8- UNIT PRIC.F OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST L. GROSS RFC EI PTS CORN TOTAL FROM PRODUCTIGN VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SEFD FERTI 150-0-0) HFR3ICIDE INSECTICIDE INSECT. APPLI. IRRIGATION LABORITRACTOR MACHINFRY) LABOR!IRR IGATION) INTEREST CN OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRF-HARVEST harvest costs custom ccmrine custom haul custom drying subtotal, HARVEST TOTAL VAPIABLE COST 3. INCCME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FI XFD COSTS MACHINFRY IPRIGATION LAND (NET RENT) TOTAL FIXFD COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS 6. NET RETURNS LAND CHARGE BASED ON 60 LESS 50 LBS. - HOUR HCUR DOL. ACRF 2.70 110.0^ 2 9 7. 0 0 0.9 5 25.00 23.75 24.00 24.00 6.75 6. 75 5.50 5.50 2.50 2.50 5.35 5.35 9.64 9.64 21.34 21.34 2.75 4.9 2 13.54 2.75 4.40 12. 10 0.10 41.47 _*1_ 12 8.61 0.20 110.00 22.00 0.12 110.00 13.20 0.10 110.00 4 6. 2 0 7.6 3 5.79 3 5.20 42.40 35 OF IRRIGATION FIXED COSTS, * 1 7 4. 3 1 1 2 2. 1 9 7.68 5.79 35.20 9 1. 0 7 2 6 5. 8 3 3 1. 1 2 PROJFCTED, 1976 COUNTY _ 2 ENTERPRISE _ 2 REGION 01 MACH. COMP. IRIG. SYSTEM i_ PR ICE v IRIG. LEVEL _ LANC CLASS 0 MGMT. CODE 2 VECT. Q EQUIP. COMP. _2 ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 9 THE TEX1 INPUT CAPDS STORFD WITH THIS R F I X 0 0 4 2. 4 0 0 1. 0 0 0 END* 0 0 0.0 o. o D AT E P R T N T F D : 1 2 / 0 3 / 7 5 BUDGET ARE AS FOLLOWS

CORN FOP GRAIN,»=URRQW IRPIGATED, TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT FUFL,OIL, F I X F D I TEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB., REP. COSTS OPERAT ION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PFR ACRF PER SHREDDER It 53 NOV I. 0 0 0.245 0.163 0.9 7 0.35 TANDEM DISC 47 NOV 0.0 0. 159 0.07 0.2 3 TANDEM DISC 3,47 NOV 0.239 0.159 0.67 0.59 10 NOV 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 0.20 1, o DEC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HARROW 57 DEC 0.0 0. 139 0.01 0.05 10 DEC 0.10 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0.20 10 JAN 0.10 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0.20 OFFSET OISC 1,49 EFq 1.00 0.2 39 0.159 0.92 0.79 TANDEM DISC 3,47 FEB 0.2 39 0. 159 0.67 0.5 0 10 FEB 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 0.20 FLOAT 3,39 MAR 2.00 1.759 1.173 5.21 5.39 LTSTER 6-R 1,65 MAR 0.146 0.098 0.53 0.37 10 MAR 0.10 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0.20 ROD WFEDER 3,55 APR 0. 146 0.098 0.33 0.26 LISTER--PLANTFR 1,45 APR 0.231 0.1*4 0.97 0.90 HERB SPRAYER 61 APR 0.0 0.121 0.02 0.06 PTCKUP 10 APR o.io 0. 125 0. 100 0.34 0.2O ROLLING CUL T. 3,31 MAY 0.181 0.121 0.56 0.48 TOOL BAR 3,63 MAY I. 0 0 0.122 0.081 0.31 0.20 10 MAY O.LO 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0. 20 10 JUNE 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 O.20 10 JULY 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.34 0.20 10 AUG 0.10 0.125 0. 100 0.34 0.2O P ICKUP 10 SEPT 0.10 J1:LZ2 2_ TOTALS 4.923 3.334 14.99 13.47 LAND CHARGE RASED ON 6 0 L E S S 5 0 % C F I R R I G A T I O N F I X E D C O S T S, BUDGET IDENTIFICATICN NUMBER 72 001602 110 0 ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 9

-10- CORN FOR GRAIN, FURROW IRRIGATED, TEXAS HIGH PLAINS 1 ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT REGION UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OP COST I. GROSS RECEIPTS CORN TOTAL FRCM PRODUCTION 2.70 140.00 3 7 8. 0 0 VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SEED FFRT( 180-0-0) HERBICIDE INSECTICIDE INSFCT. APPLI. IRR IGATION LABORITRACTOR MACHINFRY) LABOR( IRRIGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUSTOM COMBINE CUSTOM HAUL CUSTOM DRYING SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLF COST 3. IMCOMF ABOVF VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS IRRIGATION LAND (NET RENT) TOTAL FT XFO COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS 6. NET RETURNS LBS. 0.95 25.00 23.75 36.45 36.45 6.7 5 6. 75 5.50 5.50 2.50 2.50 5.40 5.40 10.6 3 10.63 25.22 25.22 HOUR 2.75 5.21 14.34 HCUR 2.75 5.20 14.30 DOL. 0.10 48.97 Q 149.73 0.20 140.00 28.00 0.12 140.00 16.30 0.10 140.00 " 58.80 7.83 7.83 6.36 6.36 41.60 41.60 39.20." 94.99 LAND CHARGE BASFD ON 60 LESS 50 S OF IRRIGATION FIXED COSTS, M A r M T Y r n M D F N T ^ ^ I, S F * * - f l R E G I N * L I R I G ' L E V F L * L A N D C L A S 0 " G M T. C O D E 1 M A C H. C O M P. I R I G. S Y S T E M 1 P R I C F V E C T. 0. E Q U I P. C O M P. 0 ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 9 THE TFX1 INPUT CARDS STORED WITH THIS BUDGFT ARE AS FOLLOWS* R F I X 0 0 3 9. 2 0 0 1. 0 0 0 FND* 0 0 0.0 0.0 D AT E P R I N T F D : 1 2 / 0 3 / 7 5 203.53 169.47 303.53 74.47