Double Chooz and non Asian efforts towards θ 13 Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Similar documents
arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 15 Aug 2006

Observation of Reactor Antineutrinos at RENO. Soo-Bong Kim for the RENO Collaboration KNRC, Seoul National University March 29, 2012

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Jelena Maricic Drexel University. For Double Chooz Collaboration. Spain. France. Germany U.S.A. Japan Russia. Brazil U.K. Courtesy of T.

Neutrino Physics. Neutron Detector in the Aberdeen Tunnel Underground Laboratory. The Daya Bay Experiment. Significance of θ 13

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

An Underground Laboratory for a Multi-Detector Experiment. Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Correlated Background measurement in Double Chooz experiment

章飞虹 ZHANG FeiHong INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SUBNUCLEAR PHYSICS Ph.D. student from Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing

The Double Chooz Project

Daya Bay and joint reactor neutrino analysis

New results from RENO and prospects with RENO-50

KamLAND. Studying Neutrinos from Reactor

The Double Chooz reactor neutrino experiment

PoS(NEUTEL2017)007. Results from RENO. Soo-Bong Kim. for the RENO collaboration Seoul National University, Republic of Korea

Neutrinos. Why measure them? Why are they difficult to observe?

The Daya Bay Anti-neutrino Experiment

Status of 13 measurement in reactor experiments

The Search for θ13 : First Results from Double Chooz. Jaime Dawson, APC

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

New Results from RENO

Neutrino Experiment. Wei Wang NEPPSR09, Aug 14, 2009

Precise sin 2 2θ 13 measurement by the Daya Bay reactor neutrino experiment.

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENTS AT NUCLEAR REACTORS

Wei Wang University of Wisconsin-Madison. NNN09, Estes Park, Colorado, Oct 8, 2009

Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part I

Double Chooz Sensitivity Analysis: Impact of the Reactor Model Uncertainty on Measurement of Sin 2 (2θ 13 )

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

PoS(ICHEP2016)474. SoLid: Search for Oscillations with a Lithium-6 Detector at the SCK CEN BR2 reactor

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment NUFACT05. Jun Cao. Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 May 2015

LOW ENERGY SOLAR NEUTRINOS WITH BOREXINO. Lea Di Noto on behalf of the Borexino collaboration

Status of The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Search for Sterile Neutrinos with the Borexino Detector

Precise measurement of reactor antineutrino oscillations at Daya Bay

Status of the Daya Bay Experiment

Recent oscillation analysis results from Daya Bay

KamLAND. Introduction Data Analysis First Results Implications Future

Neutron flux measurement using fast-neutron activation of 12 B and 12 N isotopes in hydrocarbonate scintillators

Observation of Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance at RENO

A Trial of Neutrino Detection from Joyo Fast Research Reactor

Y2 Neutrino Physics (spring term 2017)

Steve Biller, Oxford

The Nucifer Experiment: Non-Proliferation with Reactor Antineutrinos

Initial Results from the CHOOZ Long Baseline Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 27 Jun 2017

Neutrinos & Weak Interactions

Reactor On/Off Monitoring with a Prototype of Plastic Anti-neutrino Detector Array (PANDA)

The JUNO veto detector system. Haoqi Lu Institute of High Energy physics (On Behalf of the JUNO Collaboration) TIPP2017, May22-26,Beijing

Rivelazione di neutrini solari - Borexino Lino Miramonti 6 Giugno 2006 Gran Sasso

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

A Large Liquid Scintillator Detector for Neutrino Mass Hierarchy : RENO-50

Neutrino Masses and Mixing

Reactor-based Neutrino Experiment

Latest Results of Double Chooz. Stefan Schoppmann for the Double Chooz Collaboration

Background Characterization and Rejection in the LZ Detector. David Malling Brown University IDM 2012 July 25, 2012

- Future Prospects in Oscillation Physics -

ECT Lecture 2. - Reactor Antineutrino Detection - The Discovery of Neutrinos. Thierry Lasserre (Saclay)

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2009 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 11 : Neutrino Oscillations. Neutrino Experiments

Results on geoneutrinos at Borexino experiment. Heavy Quarks and Leptons Yamagata Davide Basilico

Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics

Prospects for Measuring the Reactor Neutrino Flux and Spectrum

Solar Neutrinos in Large Liquid Scintillator Detectors

School of Mathematics and Physics, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou , China

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 28 Nov 2002 V. Martemyanov 1, L. Mikaelyan 2, V. Sinev 3, V. Kopeikin 4, Yu. Kozlov 5

저작권법에따른이용자의권리는위의내용에의하여영향을받지않습니다.

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiments: Status and Prospects

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

Measurement of q 13. Kwong Lau University of Houston Flavor Physics & CP Violation 2013 (FPCP 2013) Búzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil May 22, 2013

The ultimate measurement?

Neutron background and possibility for shallow experiments

Sterile Neutrino Experiments at Accelerator

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

Reactor Short Baseline Neutrino Experiment in Korea

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

The DarkSide-50 Outer Detectors

RENO & RENO-50. RENO Reactor Neutrino Experiment. RENO = Reactor Experiment for Neutrino Oscillation. (On behalf of RENO Collaboration)

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 7 Sep 2009

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

The GERmanium Detector Array

LUX: A Large Underground Xenon detector. WIMP Search. Mani Tripathi, INPAC Meeting. Berkeley, May 5, 2007

MiniBooNE, LSND, and Future Very-Short Baseline Experiments

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

θ13 Measurements with Reactor Antineutrinos

50 years of Friendship Mikhail Danilov, LPI(Moscow)

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance & Future Prospect

Antineutrino Detectors for a High-Precision Measurement of θ13 at Daya Bay

Monte Carlo Simulations for Future Geoneutrino Detectors

arxiv: v6 [hep-ex] 10 Jan 2018

Recent Results from RENO & Future Project RENO-50

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 4 Mar 2014

Transcription:

Double Chooz and non Asian efforts towards θ 13 Journal of Physics: Conference Series Thierry Lasserre 1 CEA/Saclay and Laboratoire Astroparticle & Cosmologie Institut de Recherche des Lois Fondamentales de l Univers Service de Physique des Particules 91191 Gif-s-Yvette, France E-mail: thierry.lasserre@cea.fr Abstract. Neutrino oscillation physics is entering a precision measurement area. The smallness of the θ 13 neutrino mixing angle is still enigmatic and should be resolved. Double Chooz will use two identical detectors near the Chooz nuclear power station to search for a non vanishing θ 13, and hopefully open the way to experiments aspiring to discover CP violation in the leptonic sector. The Angra project aims to prevail over the Double Chooz experiment if the third neutrino oscillation channel is not discovered in the forthcoming years. 1. Searching θ 13 with a new multi-detector reactor neutrino experiment Nuclear reactors are prolific sources of having an energy range extending to ten MeV. Reactor neutrino experiments 1 measure the survival probability at a distance L (km) from the source. According to the current set of parameters the survival probability can be expressed by:, if L is less than a few kilometers. It is worth noting that, thanks to the combination of the low energies and the short baselines considered, the modification of the oscillation probability induced by the coherent forward scattering from matter electrons can be neglected. In addition, the disappearance probability does not depend on the CP complex phase. Thus, a middle-baseline reactor neutrino experiment provides a clean determination of sin 2 (2θ 13 ). It is worth noting that the CHOOZ experiment still holds the world best mark on θ 13, sin 2 (2θ 13 )<0.2 2. The concept of the new generation of reactor experiments is to perform a relative measurement of the neutrino flux and spectrum within the percent precision using state of the art technologies. At least two identical detectors are required in order to significantly improve the CHOOZ sensitivity. The first, located at a few hundred meters from the nuclear cores, monitors the neutrino flux and spectrum before the neutrino oscillation. The others located between 1 and 2 km away from the cores search for a departure from the overall 1/L 2 behaviour of the neutrino energy spectrum, the signature of oscillation. This new set-up provides a great improvement in the search for a small mixing angle since the reactor neutrino source was the largest source of uncertainties in previous experiments. In addition the exposure (power running time) is being increased by a factor of 15 to reduce the statistical error. 1 To whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Figure 1. Viewgraph of the Double Chooz detector in the Chooz underground laboratory located 1.050 km from the nuclear cores. 2. Double Chooz The Double Chooz initiative started early 2003 3. The Chooz nuclear power station, operated by the company Electricité de France, was selected because of the availability of the underground neutrino laboratory constructed for the first experiment carried out at Chooz (Figure 1). It is located at 1.05 km from the nuclear cores. Two nuclear cores produce a thermal power of 4.27 GW each. Neutrinos are produced by the β-decays of the unstable nuclei produced by the fissions of 235,238 U and 239,241 Pu. The absolute normalization and the spectral shape of this neutrino source are known to a precision of 2%. The Double Chooz experiment will employ two almost identical detectors of 10.3 cubic meter fiducial volume. In order eliminate the neutrino spectrum uncertainty as well as to reduce the detector systematic errors, a second detector will be installed 400 m away from the nuclear cores, in a new underground neutrino laboratory, 40 meter deep, located at the end of a 150 m tunnel to be excavated. Reactor neutrinos will be detected through the inverse β-decay: (1.8 MeV threshold) in organic liquid scintillator doped with 1g/l of a gadolinium complex enhancing the neutron capture. The energy of the incident antineutrino is directly correlated to the kinetic energy of the detected positron. The coincidence of the prompt positron followed by the neutron capture, with a 30 µs time constant, allows a strong rejection of accidental background. In a non oscillation scenario, we expect to detect 55 (550) neutrinos per day inside the far (near) detector, accounting for the detector inefficiencies. The basic principle of the multi-detector concept is the cancellation of the reactor-induced systematic error. Technically, the two detectors should have a set of very similar parameters to guarantee their identity for the neutrino oscillation search: identical target geometry, a single liquid scintillator batch In order to correct for the unavoidable differences between the two detector responses, a comprehensive set of calibration systems is being installed, consisting of radioactive sources deployed

in the three inner detector regions, laser light flashers in the inner detector, and LED pulses in the inner detector and in the Veto. In addition, a new detector design has been thought in order to simplify the analysis and to reduce the systematic errors while keeping high statistics and high detection efficiency. Naturally occurring radioactivity mostly creates random background, defined as an accidental coincidence of a prompt energy deposition in the energy range of the expected prompt positron, followed by a delayed neutron-like event within 100 µs. Selection of high purity materials for detector construction and passive shielding around the active region provide an efficient protection against this type of background. This leads to constraints ranging from 10-9 g/g of U/Th for the outermost regions to 10-12 g/g of U/Th inside the fiducial volume. Constraints for natural potassium range from 10-8 g/g to 10-10 g/g correspondingly. It is worth to mention that accidental backgrounds can be correctly measured in situ by varying the time window separation between two consecutive events. Cosmic ray muons will dominate the trigger rate at both detector sites (6.10-5 cm -2 s -1 & 5.10-4 cm -2 s -1 ). Furthermore they are inducing the most critical backgrounds. Muon- induced production of the radioactive isotopes 8 He, 9 Li and 11 Li cannot be correlated to the primary muon interaction since their lifetimes are much longer than the characteristic time between two subsequent muon interactions. These neutron-rich radioisotopes β-decay are mimicking the prompt signal and later evaporate a neutron. This cascade fakes the neutrino signal, and the few events produced each day in the target volume have to be correctly subtracted to deduce the true neutrino event rate. A further source of background comes from neutrons that are produced in the surrounding rocks by cosmic ray muon induced hadronic cascades, not tagged by the inner veto system and being thus invisible. Fast neutrons may then enter the detector, create recoil protons mimicking the prompt signal and be captured by gadolinium nuclei after thermalisation. Such a sequence can be misidentified as a neutrino event. Fortunately this background could be fairly well estimated to one to two counts per day at the far site, from the measurements of the CHOOZ experiment during reactor off periods. Estimation for the near detector site is done by scaling the muon flux by a factor 8, and the mean muon energy by 0.6 (30 GeV/ 60 GeV to the power 0.72). Figure 2. Viewgraph of the Double Chooz detector design. The Target vessels contains 10.3 m 3 of organic liquid scintillator doped with Gd. The full detector is composed of about 250 m 3 of oil and scintillator, and 300 tons of mechanical structure and shielding.

The Double Chooz detector design is an evolution of the CHOOZ detector. The detector core consists of a proton-rich liquid scintillator mixture loaded with gadolinium at a concentration of 1 g/l 3. The solvent is a phenyl-xylylethane/dodecane mixture at a volume ratio of 20:80, so as to improve the chemical compatibility with the acrylic and to increase the number of free protons in the target. Primary PPO (3-6 g/l) and secondary Bis-MSB (20 mg/l) fluors are also used to shift the photon wavelengths to the suitable range of the photocathodes, and to improve the scintillator transparency. Metal loading of liquid scintillator has been comprehensively studied within the collaboration since 2003, and a new gadolinium encapsulation technique has been carefully tuned for Double Chooz, based on β-diketonate chemistry. Starting from the centre the detector elements are as follows (Figure 2). The fiducial volume consists of a cylindrical region of 1.15 m radius and 2.8 m height (10.3 m3) filled with a gadolinium-doped liquid scintillator. The target vessels are built with acrylic plastic material, transparent to visible photons. A second acrylic vessel, the gamma-catcher, encloses the target, providing a 55 cm thick buffer of nonloaded liquid scintillator all around. This scintillating buffer is necessary to fully contain the energy deposition of gamma rays from the neutron capture on gadolinium, as well as the positron annihilation gamma rays in the central region. It also improves the rejection of the fast neutron background. The gamma-catcher vessel is surrounded by a 105 cm thick region of non-scintillating oil so as to reduce the level of accidental background, coming mainly from the radioactivity of the photomultiplier tubes (40K, 238U, 232Th). The oil is contained in an opaque vessel made of thin stainless steel sheets and stiffeners, supports 390 inward facing 10-inch photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), providing 13% photocathode coverage. The inner detector is encapsulated within a muon veto shield, 50 cm thick, and filled with scintillating organic liquid and viewed by 78 8-inch PMTs. It allows the detection of particles entering or leaving the inner detector. Because of space constraint, the 70 cm sand shielding of CHOOZ is replaced by a 15 cm iron layer so as to increase the target volume. Above the detector pit, a highly segmented muon tracker system will identify and locate the muons missed by the inner system, with the purpose of improving the background rejection. The near and far detectors will be identical inside the PMTs supporting structure, allowing a relative normalization error of 0.6 %, or less. Figure 3. View of the 7m x 7m pit at the Chooz neutrino laboratory after the installation of the 15 cm steel shielding (August 2008).

The construction of the Double Chooz first constituents started in 2005. The integration of the first detector at 1 km started in May 2008 with the demagnetization of the 250 tons steel shielding and its installation in the pit during the summer 2008 (Figure 3). In parallel the neutrino laboratory has been completely refurbished (safety installations, ventilation, electricity) and characterized for backgrounds. Beside the neutrino laboratory a 200 m 2 building is being equipped for fluid operation and the first six tanks for the Buffer and Veto liquids have been installed. In the collaboration institutes the gadolinium and the target scintillator are ready for mixing in a single batch for both detectors. All mechanical vessels, the Veto made of steel, the Buffer made of stainless steel, and the acrylics vessels are being manufactured in the industry. The production of the PMTs, magnetic shielding and associated support structure is finished for both detectors, and all the phototubes should be tested before the end of the year. The Inner Veto system is going to be installed at the end of the year. The Outer Veto system is also in production phase. The Double Chooz experiment offers the world s particle physics community a valuable opportunity to measure the mixing angle θ 13 within an unrivalled time scale 4. The data taking will be divided in two phases: a first one with the far detector only, and a second phase with both near- and far-detectors running simultaneously. Double Chooz will be sensitive to sin 2 (2θ 13 )>0.06 after 1.5 year of data taking in phase I, and to sin 2 (2θ 13 )>0.03 or better after 3 years of operation with two detectors (Figures 4, 5). Figure 4. Sensitivity of the Double Chooz experiment 4 versus the data taking time. The experiment will start in 2009 with the far detector only, and will then continue 1.5 years later with both detectors running simultaneously. After 1.5 year an upper limit of sin 2 (2θ 13 )<0.06 is expected at 90% C.L., while the experimental goal with two detector is to reach a sensitivity of sin 2 (2θ 13 )>0.03. Even if sin 2 (2θ 13 ) lie above 0.06 a neutrino oscillation discovery at Double Chooz would be only strongly strengthen after the near detector start. Beside the reactor neutrino program, new accelerator neutrino beams coupled with off-axis detectors, will search for a ν e appearance signal leading to similar constraint on θ 13 5. The observation of a ν e excess in an almost pure ν µ neutrino beam would be major evidence for a non-vanishing θ 13. But in addition to the statistical and systematic uncertainties, correlations and degeneracies between mixing angles, the neutrino masses, and the CP phase degrade the accessible knowledge on θ 13 6.If θ 13 is large, the information gained by Double Chooz could break the parameter correlations and degeneracies and long-baseline off-axis neutrino experiments will be able to search for CP violation in the lepton sector. The reactor and accelerator programs will provide complementary results to better constrain the last

undetermined mixing parameters. Another non-asian reactor neutrino experiment is being proposed to search for θ 13, the Angra project still being at the conceptual stage 7. Figure 5. Double Chooz sensitivity as a function of main systematics guesses 4. Each systematic impact on sensitivity is separately computed and illustrated as ratio R = sin 2 (2θ 13 ) best or worst / sin 2 (2θ 13 ) baseline. The overall impact changing all three systematics together is also illustrated with the grey area. Best, baseline, and worst systematics guess are considered as : 1%, 2%, 3% for the reactor thermal power uncertainty (red), 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% for the relative detector uncertainty (green), 1%, 2%, 3% for the neutrino spectrum uncertainty (blue), and a scaling factor of 0, 1, 2 for the background uncertainty. This computation is done for Δm 2 =2.5 10-3 ev 2 and for 3 years of data taking with two detectors. 3. Conclusion Double Chooz is now in construction phase. The first far detector is currently being installed in the existing underground laboratory. The detector filling is expected for the summer 2009. We expect a sensitivity similar to the CHOOZ experiment at the end of 2009. The second, identical, close detector will be constructed from 2009 in a new neutrino laboratory, located down a 45 m well that will be excavated 400 m from the cores. The Double Chooz experiment promises to start the race towards θ 13 from 2009. The Angra project in Brazil might take over as a second generation experiment in the future. 4. References [1] Th. Lasserre & H. Sobel, Comptes Rendus Physique 6 (2005) 749-757, arxiv:nucl-ex/0601013. [2] M. Apollonio et al., Eur. Phys. J. C27 (2003) 331. [3] M. Goodman & Th. Lasserre et al., arxiv:hep-ex/0606025 (2006) ; F. Ardellier et al., arxiv:hep-ex/0405032 (2004). [4] G. Mention, Th. Lasserre, D. Motta, arxiv:0704.0498 (2007). [5] Y.Itow, arxiv:hep-ex/0106019 (2001). [6] P. Huber et al., Nucl. Phys. B665 (2003) 487. [7] J.C. Anjos. et al., Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 155 (2006)