Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA Mark II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear Data Library JEFF-3.1.2

Similar documents
IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-issn: Volume 8, Issue 5 Ver. I (Sep - Oct. 2016), PP

Chem 481 Lecture Material 4/22/09

MONTE CALRLO MODELLING OF VOID COEFFICIENT OF REACTIVITY EXPERIMENT

Neutronic Calculations of Ghana Research Reactor-1 LEU Core

MEASUREMENT AND COMPARISON OF CONTROL ROD WORTH OF BTRR USING INHOUR EQUATION AND PERIOD REACTIVITY CONVERSION TABLE

Effect of WIMSD4 libraries on Bushehr VVER-1000 Core Fuel Burn-up

Fuel Element Burnup Determination in HEU - LEU Mixed TRIGA Research Reactor Core

Estimation of Control Rods Worth for WWR-S Research Reactor Using WIMS-D4 and CITATION Codes

Hybrid Low-Power Research Reactor with Separable Core Concept

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 4. Title: Control Rods and Sub-critical Systems

The Effect of 99 Mo Production on the Neutronic Safety Parameters of Research Reactors

CONTROL ROD WORTH EVALUATION OF TRIGA MARK II REACTOR

Neutronic Issues and Ways to Resolve Them. P.A. Fomichenko National Research Center Kurchatov Institute Yu.P. Sukharev JSC Afrikantov OKBM,

USA HTR NEUTRONIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SAFARI-1 MATERIAL TESTING REACTOR

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 5. Title: Reactor Kinetics and Reactor Operation

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 22 Nov 2017

Introduction to Reactivity and Reactor Control

Invariability of neutron flux in internal and external irradiation sites in MNSRs for both HEU and LEU cores

Shutdown Margin. Xenon-Free Xenon removes neutrons from the life-cycle. So, xenonfree is the most reactive condition.

A Dummy Core for V&V and Education & Training Purposes at TechnicAtome: In and Ex-Core Calculations

Neutronic Analysis of Moroccan TRIGA MARK-II Research Reactor using the DRAGON.v5 and TRIVAC.v5 codes

CANDU Safety #3 - Nuclear Safety Characteristics Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing

Neutronic analysis of SFR lattices: Serpent vs. HELIOS-2

The Effect of Burnup on Reactivity for VVER-1000 with MOXGD and UGD Fuel Assemblies Using MCNPX Code

Study of boron dilution phenomenon in the core and fuel assemblies of Bushehr VVER-1000 reactor in normal operating conditions

A TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT ENDF/B-VI.8 ACE LIBRARY FOR UO2, THO2, ZIRC4, SS AISI-348, H2O, B4C AND AG-IN-CD

Analysis of the TRIGA Reactor Benchmarks with TRIPOLI 4.4

Reactivity Power and Temperature Coefficients Determination of the TRR

Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics

Validation of the MCNP computational model for neutron flux distribution with the neutron activation analysis measurement

Designing a 2D RZ Venture Model for Neutronic Analysis of the Nigeria Research Reactor-1 (NIRR-1)

Physics-based Uncertainty Quantification for ZrH x Thermal Scattering Law

The Lead-Based VENUS-F Facility: Status of the FREYA Project

Introduction to Nuclear Data

Lesson 14: Reactivity Variations and Control

M.Cagnazzo Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology Stadionallee 2, 1020 Wien, Austria

Comparison of PWR burnup calculations with SCALE 5.0/TRITON other burnup codes and experimental results. Abstract

YALINA-Booster Conversion Project

Reactor Kinetics and Operation

NEUTRONIC CALCULATION SYSTEM FOR CANDU CORE BASED ON TRANSPORT METHODS

MOx Benchmark Calculations by Deterministic and Monte Carlo Codes

Study on SiC Components to Improve the Neutron Economy in HTGR

JOYO MK-III Performance Test at Low Power and Its Analysis

NucE 497A RAMP Class #1

VALIDATION OF BATAN'S STANDARD 3-D DIFFUSION CODE, BAT AN-3DIFF, ON THE FIRST CORE OF RSG GAS. Liem Peng Hong"

Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Methodologies for Fast Reactor Physics and Design at JAEA

Utilization of Egyptian Research Reactor and modes of collaboration

DESIGN OF B 4 C BURNABLE PARTICLES MIXED IN LEU FUEL FOR HTRS

DEVELOPMENT OF REAL-TIME FUEL MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY AT THE TEXAS A&M NUCLEAR SCIENCE CENTER

EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NEUTRONIC PARAMETERS IN THE IPR-R1 TRIGA REACTOR CORE

Determination of research reactor fuel burnup

Study of Control rod worth in the TMSR

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WWER-440 REACTOR CORE WITH PARCS/HELIOS AND PARCS/SERPENT CODES

Development of 3D Space Time Kinetics Model for Coupled Neutron Kinetics and Thermal hydraulics

The moderator temperature coefficient MTC is defined as the change in reactivity per degree change in moderator temperature.

SUB-CHAPTER D.1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

CRITICAL AND SUBCRITICAL EXPERIMENTS USING THE TRAINING NUCLEAR REACTOR OF THE BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS

ACTIVATION ANALYSIS OF DECOMISSIONING OPERATIONS FOR RESEARCH REACTORS

Research Article Calculations for a BWR Lattice with Adjacent Gadolinium Pins Using the Monte Carlo Cell Code Serpent v.1.1.7

Study of the End Flux Peaking for the CANDU Fuel Bundle Types by Transport Methods

"Control Rod Calibration"

Nonlinear Iterative Solution of the Neutron Transport Equation

CALCULATION OF TEMPERATURE REACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS IN KRITZ-2 CRITICAL EXPERIMENTS USING WIMS ABSTRACT

NUCLEI. Atomic mass unit

1. INTRODUCTION 2. EAEA EXISTING CAPABILITIES AND FACILITIES

Lecture 27 Reactor Kinetics-III

Nuclear Data Uncertainty Analysis in Criticality Safety. Oliver Buss, Axel Hoefer, Jens-Christian Neuber AREVA NP GmbH, PEPA-G (Offenbach, Germany)

ENHANCEMENT OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR CANDU REACTOR PHYSICS SIMULATIONS

Neutronic analysis of nanofluids as a coolant in the Bushehr VVER-1000 reactor

DOPPLER COEFFICIENT OF REACTIVITY BENCHMARK CALCULATIONS FOR DIFFERENT ENRICHMENTS OF UO 2

VERIFICATION OF MONTE CARLO CALCULATIONS OF THE NEUTRON FLUX IN THE CAROUSEL CHANNELS OF THE TRIGA MARK II REACTOR, LJUBLJANA

Nuclear Research Reactors

NEUTRON PHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF SIX ENERGETIC FAST REACTORS

Chapter 2 Nuclear Reactor Calculations

Application of Bayesian Monte Carlo Analysis to Criticality Safety Assessment

Advanced Heavy Water Reactor. Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA

2017 Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting September 10 (Sun) ~ 14 (Thu), 2017 Ramada Plaza Jeju Jeju Island, Korea

Considerations for Measurements in Support of Thermal Scattering Data Evaluations. Ayman I. Hawari

THORIUM SELF-SUFFICIENT FUEL CYCLE OF CANDU POWER REACTOR

Invited. ENDF/B-VII data testing with ICSBEP benchmarks. 1 Introduction. 2 Discussion

Institute of Atomic Energy POLATOM OTWOCK-SWIERK POLAND. Irradiations of HEU targets in MARIA RR for Mo-99 production. G.

A Hybrid Deterministic / Stochastic Calculation Model for Transient Analysis

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF THE GREEK RESEARCH REACTOR NEUTRON IRRADIATION POSITIONS USING MCNP

Chemical Engineering 412

Malcolm Bean AT THE MAY All Rights Reserved. Signature of Author: Malcolm Bean Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering

Challenges in Prismatic HTR Reactor Physics

DESCRIPTION OF WIMS LIBRARY UPDATE PROJECT (WLUP)

Use of Monte Carlo and Deterministic Codes for Calculation of Plutonium Radial Distribution in a Fuel Cell

A Monte Carlo Simulation for Estimating of the Flux in a Novel Neutron Activation System using 252 Cf Source

RECH-1 RESEARCH REACTOR: PRESENT AND FUTURE APPLICATIONS

Improved PWR Simulations by Monte-Carlo Uncertainty Analysis and Bayesian Inference

Research Article Analysis of NEA-NSC PWR Uncontrolled Control Rod Withdrawal at Zero Power Benchmark Cases with NODAL3 Code

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ALLEGRO MOX CORE. Bratislava, Iľkovičova 3, Bratislava, Slovakia

CRITICAL LOADING CONFIGURATIONS OF THE IPEN/MB-01 REACTOR WITH UO 2 GD 2 O 3 BURNABLE POISON RODS

SLOWPOKE-2 31 YEARS AND STILL GLOWING

Numerical simulation of non-steady state neutron kinetics of the TRIGA Mark II reactor Vienna

TRANSPORT MODEL BASED ON 3-D CROSS-SECTION GENERATION FOR TRIGA CORE ANALYSIS

PWR CONTROL ROD EJECTION ANALYSIS WITH THE MOC CODE DECART

Vladimir Sobes 2, Luiz Leal 3, Andrej Trkov 4 and Matt Falk 5

VALIDATION OF VISWAM SQUARE LATTICE MODULE WITH MOX PIN CELL BENCHMARK

Transcription:

IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-issn: 2278-486.Volume 9, Issue 4 Ver. IV (Jul. Aug. 207), PP 67-72 www.iosrjournals.org Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA Mar II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear Data Library JEFF-3..2 M.M. Islam, M.M. Haque 2, S.M.A. ISLAM 3, J.I. Khandaer 3 Department of Physics, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science & Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh 2 Materials Science Division, Atomic Energy Centre Dhaa, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaa, Bangladesh 3 Department of Physics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaa, Bangladesh Corresponding Author: M. M. Islam Abstract : The present wor consists of a theoretical study of control rod worth of TRIGA Mar II research reactor using the evaluated nuclear data library JEFF-3..2. The data files of the evaluated nuclear data library cannot be used directly as input to neutronic or other applied calculations. These data files are to be converted to preprocessed files and then to post processed into multi-group files, which are then directed into specially formatted woring libraries. These libraries are compatible with the neutronic codes. This subject involves computer software using nowledge of ENDF-6 formats, thermal ects, shelf-shielding factors in resolved and unresolved resonance regions, transfer matrices of various Legendre orders etc. The chain codes NJOY99.0, WIMSD-5B and CITATION are used to evaluate the control rod worth of six control rods of TRIGA Mar II research reactor. The obtained results of control rods worth are compared with experimental results of TRIGA at Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Savar, Dhaa, Bangladesh; and the reliability of the method was confirmed. Keywords: JEFF-3..2, NJOY99.0, WIMSD-5B, CITATION, TRIGA Mar II ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Date of Submission: 4-04-207 Date of acceptance: 26-08-207 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- I. Introduction The science of atomic radiation, atomic change and nuclear fission was developed from 895 to 945, much of it in the last six of those years. Over 939-45, most development was focused on the atomic bomb. From 945 attention was given to harnessing nuclear fission energy in a controlled fashion for naval propulsion and for maing electricity. The prime focus has been on the technological evolution of reliable nuclear power plants since 956 []. The device in which a nuclear reaction is maintained and controlled for the production of nuclear energy is delineated as nuclear reactor. Nuclear reactors serve three general purposes. Civilian reactors are used to generate energy for electricity and sometimes also steam for district heating. Military reactors create materials that can be used in nuclear weapons. Research reactors are used to develop weapons or energy production technology, for training purposes, for nuclear physics experimentation, for producing radio-isotopes for medicine and research. The chemical composition of the fuel, the type of coolant and other details important to reactor operation depend on reactor design. Most designs have some flexibility as to the type of fuel that can be used. Nuclear research reactors are neutrons factories, in which the main purposes are to generate and utilize neutron flux of sufficient intensity for research, testing and other applications [2]. There are six types of research reactor are available in the world. These are Aqueous homogeneous reactor, Argonaut class reactor, DIDO reactor, TRIGA reactor, Miniature neutron source reactor, SLOWPOKE reactor. TRIGA is the highly successful class reactor. TRIGA (Training, Research, Isotopes, General Atomics) reactor is the most widely used non-power nuclear reactor in the world provided by General Atomics (GA), USA. GA produces three types of TRIGA which are TRIGA Mar I, TRIGA Mar II and TRIGA Mar III. Almost 66 TRIGA reactors have been installed at universities, government and industrial laboratories and medical centers in 24 countries [3]. These reactors are used in many diverse applications, including production of radioisotopes for medicine and industry, treatment of tumors, nondestructive testing, basic research on the properties of matter, for education and training. The safety features of this fuel also permit flexibility in sating with minimal environmental ects. Control rod is one important component in a nuclear reactor. In nuclear reactor operations, the control rod function is to shut down the reactor. Control rod worth calculation is used to specify safety margin of reactor. Temperature reactivity coicients of fuel and coolant are one of the inherent factors that can control reactor power. This study has been done about control rod worth calculation by using the rod displacement method. The reactor core has been simulated by using NJOY99.0 [4], WIMSD-5B [5] and CITATION [6,7] codes to perform neutronic calculations. The more reliable nuclear data library JEFF-3..2 is used to calculate the control rod worth of the TRIGA Mar II research reactor. DOI: 0.9790/486-0904046772 www.iosrjournals.org 67 Page

Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA Mar II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear... II. Calculation Technique The three computer program; NJOY99.0, WIMSD-5B and CITATION, and the data files of evaluated data library JEFF-3..2 are used in this research. The updated version NJOY99.0 of NJOY has the capability to process data in ENDF-6 format [8], which is used in JEFF-3..2. The chain of NJOY99.0 modules [9] are used to generate the 69-group cross section library from the basic data files of JEFF-3..2 is shown schematically in Fig.. The new version code WIMS-D, formally to be identified as WIMSD-5B, developed on the basis of the old WIMSD version of Atomic Energy Authority (AEA) Technology; was implemented on operating system with Lahey F77l3 FORTRAN compiler. In this version, additional possibilities proposed by the code users have been included. The unique WIMSD structure is used with 69 energy group; i.e. 4 fast group, 3 resonance group and 42 thermal groups [0]. The CITATION code is designed to solve problems involving the finite-difference representation of diffusion theory treating up to three space dimensions with arbitrary group- to-group scattering. Depletion problems may be solved and fuel problem may be managed for multi-cycle analysis. The core of the 3 MW TRIGA Mar II research reactor consists of a total 00 fuel elements (including 5 fuel follower control rods), 6 control rods (with one transient rod), 8 graphite dummy elements, central thimble (CT) and pneumatic transfer system irradiation terminus. Fig.2 shows the core configuration of TRIGA Mar II research reactor. All these elements are placed and supported in between two grid plates and arranged in 7 hexagonal rings A, B, C, D, E, F and G of a hexagonal lattice. The geometry of the core-consists of concentric layers of hexagons with an equidistant pin rod array of hexagonal symmetry is shown in Fig.3. The function of six control rods placed in D-ring are listed in table-. The reactor fuel is composed of 20 wt% Uranium enriched to 9.7% Zirconium hydride (ZrH) (prime moderator) and burnable poison (Er-67). The reactor is controlled by 6 control rods, which contain boron carbide (B 4 C) as the neutron absorber material. Three dimensional X-Y-Z slab geometry (Cartesian coordinate system with orthogonal axes) were used in this wor where, X, Y and Z express width, height and depth, respectively. The reactor core was simulated taing width of 3.8cm, height of 36.2 cm and depth 90.30 cm. The present reactor core having the region width was divided by 49 meshes, region height by 53 meshes and region depth by 4 meshes. The three dimensional TRIGA core were simulated in the direction of X-Y-Z for seven collapsed energy group from 69 group. The position of six control rods is shown in Fig.4. The mesh points are chosen such that they give the best results considering the physical geometry of the cell. Thus, the generated TRIGA library that contains diffusion coicient, absorption cross section and production cross section were customized to interface with CITATION. A recent study provides the validation of the data files of JEFF-3..2 & JENDL-4.0u for the theoretical study of TRIGA Mar II research reactor [, 2]. These methods can be dynamic or static and the experimental measurements could be used as a set of benchmar cases in the verification of all the six control rods are positioned at different locations of D-ring of the reactor core. The control rod worth calculations were performed in this study, by rod insertion method using JEFF-3..2 nuclear data library. The simulation started with all control rods completely in withdrawn position. To calculate a new one of the control rods were inserted fully at the desired location in D-ring of the core. DOI: 0.9790/486-0904046772 www.iosrjournals.org 68 Page

Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA Mar II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear... The following definition of reactivity was used to calculate the values of reactivity associated with each of these values, (in dollar, $) Where, is the ective delayed neutron fraction for U ZrH type fuel with a value of 0.007 that is used to convert the unit from / to dollar. The control rod worth for a position in the D-ring was determined by comparing and 0 and reactivity. ρ ρ 0 ρ ff,0 β, 0 d For Shim-III rod d 6 d $ d d 6 Therefore worth () for Transient control rod is d 6 $ For Shim-I rod d 3 $ DOI: 0.9790/486-0904046772 www.iosrjournals.org 69 Page d 3 The worth of other three control rod was calculated in analogous way. Table: Activity of control rods of TRIGA Mar II Control Rod Id Name Activity D3 Shim I Used for coarse control to change reactivity in relatively large amounts. D4 Shim II Used for coarse control to change reactivity in relatively large amounts. D6 Shim III Used for coarse control to change reactivity in relatively large amounts. D0 Regulating Used for coarse control to change reactivity in relatively large amounts desired power or temperature. D7 Safety Furnished to fast shutdown in the event of an unsafe condition. D Transient For instant control in the pulse mode operation. III. Result And Discussion The determination of the reactivity worth of individual control elements and the ects of such elements on the power distribution in the core is important to the safe and icient operation of a reactor. Once d 3

Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA Mar II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear... a control rod is calibrated, it is possible to evaluate the magnitude of other reactivity changes by comparing the critical rod positions before and after the change [3]. The control system of a reactor must have the ability of shutting the reactor down safely at any time. Most reactors contain control rods made of neutron absorbing materials that are used to adjust the reactivity of the core control rods are used for improper control, fine control and fast shutdowns. Typically materials for control rods include Silver, Indium, Cadmium, Boron or Hafnium. Material used for the control rods varies depending on reactor design. The material selected should have good absorption cross section for neutrons and a long lifetime as an absorber. Table 2: Worth of different control rods of TRIGA Mar II Rods CITATION (JEFF-3..2) MCNP4C (in EXPT. (in (in dollars) dollars) dollars) SHIM I (D3) 2.95 2.80 3.06 SHIM II (D4) 2.68 2.74 2.82 SHIM III (D6) 2.84 2.87 3.2 REGULATING (D0) 2.73 2.67 2.78 TRANSIENT (D) 2.22 2.3 2.24 SAFETY (D7) 2.6 2.62 2.73 Total 6.03 6.0 6.75 Figure 5: Fission cross section of U-235 in WIMS output for JEFF-3.2. JEFF-3..2 is the more reliable data library for the safety analysis of TRIGA MARK II [4]. That s why JEFF-3..2 is chosen for the calculation of worth of control rod of TRIGA Mar II. The iciency of control rods depend largely upon the ratio of neutron flux at the location of the rod to the average neutron flux in the reactor. In TRIGA Mar II research reactor there are around 7 isotopes. U-235 and U-238 plays an important role in the fission chain reaction. Fission cross section of U-235 and U-238 in the WIMS output are calculated and plotted in Fig.5 and Fig.6 respectively. It is observed that the fission cross section of U-235 is significantly larger than U-238. Figure 6: Fission cross section of U-238 in WIMS output for JEFF-3.2. The control rod has highest ect if it is placed where the flux is at maximum. If a reactor has only one control rod, the rod should be placed in the center of the reactor core. If additional rods are added to this simple reactor, the most ective location is where, the flux is maximum. Numerous control rods are required for a DOI: 0.9790/486-0904046772 www.iosrjournals.org 70 Page

Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA Mar II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear... reactor that has a large amount of excess reactivity. The change in reactivity caused by control rod motion is referred to as control rod worth. There are several experimental techniques used to measure the reactivity The calculated control rod worth is shown in table 2 and the comparison with experimental and MCNP4C values [5,6] is graphically shown in Fig.7. WIMS-CITATION calculation were performed for the fresh core with no fuel burn up using the cross section library based JEFF-3..2. It is observed that the worth is maximum for Shim-I rod and minimum for transient control rod are 2.95$ and 2.22$ respectively. The calculated values show very good agreement with MCNP4C and experimental results. Figure 7: Control rod worth comparison for TRIGA Mar II IV. Conclusion The essential constraint of the control system of the reactor core is that it would be capable of providing compensation for all short-term reactivity changes in the sufficient margin to shut down the reactor under the jammed rod condition. The reactivity insertion of TRIGA core is extremely sensitive to power, so the control rod worth must be calculated to control the power as well as the temperature increment. In addition, in research reactors, reactivity and reactivity increments play an important role in safety and controlled operational. The calculated total control rod worth values obtained by JEFF-3..2 library is 6.03 $. This value is close to the experimental one (6.75 $) but very close to MCNP4C value (6.0 $). References [] C. Hardy and G. Haven, Atomic rise and fall, Australian Dictionary of Biography, 9, 999, 23-27. [2] International Atomic Energy Agency, Strategic planning for research reactors, IAEA-TECDOC-22, 200. [3] R. Henry, I. Tiselj and L. Snoj, Analysis of JSI TRIGA MARK II reactor physical parameters calculated with TRIPOLI and MCNP, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 97, 205, 40 48. [4] R.E. MacFarlane and D.W. Muir, NJOY99.0: Code system for producing pointwise and multigroup neutron and photon cross sections from ENDF/B, RSICC Code Pacage PSR-480. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, 999. [5] T. Kuliowsa, WIMSD-5B: A neutronic code for standard lattice physics analysis, Distributed by NEA Data Ban. Saclay, France, 996. DOI: 0.9790/486-0904046772 www.iosrjournals.org 7 Page

Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA Mar II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear... [6] T.B. Fowler and D.R. Vondy, CITATION: A computer program for solving diffusion theory treating up to three dimension, ORNL- TM-2496, 97. [7] D.R. Vondy and T.B. Fowler, Job stream of cases for the computer code CITATION, ORNL-TM-3793, 972. [8] P.F. Rose, C.L. Dunford, ENDF-02 Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF-6. BNL-44945, Broohaven National Laboratory, USA. 990. [9] M. Halder and S.M.T. Islam, Comparative study of generated wimsd-5b multigroup constants library based on JENDL-3.2 with JEFF-3.., CENDL-3.0 and original WIMS and validation of generated library through some benchmar experiments analysis, IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, 8(2), 206, 39-43. [0] F. Leszczynsi, Description of Wims Library Update Project (WLUP), 2002 International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, Bariloche, Argentina, November 3-8, 2002. [] M.M. Islam, M.M. Haque and S.M.A. Islam, Substantiation of data files of JEFF-3..2 for safety analysis of TRIGA Mar II reactor through the scrutiny of integral parameter of benchmar lattices TRX and BAPL, American Journal of Modern Physics, 5(5), 206, 35-4. [2] M.M. Islam, M.M. Haque and S.M.A. Islam, Validation of data files of JENDL-4.0u for neutronic calculation of TRIGA Mar II reactor through the investigation of integral parameter of benchmar lattices TRX and BAPL, IOSR Journal of Journal of Applied Physics, 8(5), 206, 8-24. [3] M.N. Uddin, M.M. Sarer, M.J.H. Khan, S.M.A. Islam, Computational analysis of neutronic parameters for TRIGA Mar II research reactor using evaluated nuclear data libraries, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 37(3), 200, 302 309. [4] M.M. Islam, M.M. Haque, S.M.A. Islam, Comparison of JEFF-3..2 and JENDL-4.0u for TRIGA Mar-II calculation through the benchmaring of integral parameter of TRX and BAPL lattice of thermal reactor, International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 6(2), 207, 6-2. [5] M.Q. Huda, S.I. Bhuiyan, T.K. Chatroborty, M.M. Sarer and M.A.W. Mondal, Thermal-Hydraulic analysis of 3 -MW TRIGA Mar-II research reactor under steady-state and transient conditions, Nuclear Technology, 35(), 200, 5-66. [6] M.M. Rahman, M.A.R. Aond, M. K. Basher and M. Q. Huda, Steady-state thermal-hydraulic analysis of TRIGA research reactor, World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 4, 204, 8-87. M. M. Islam. Calculation of Control Rod Worth of TRIGA MARK II Reactor Using Evaluated Nuclear Data Library JEFF-3..2. IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP), vol. 9, no. 4, 207, pp. 67 72. DOI: 0.9790/486-0904046772 www.iosrjournals.org 72 Page