Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

Similar documents
Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Optimizing Standard Preparation

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: Cascade Thornapple River Assoc. Project: Water Analysis Lab Order:

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013.

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc.

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

Reduced VOC Sample Analysis Times Using a New Dual Purge-and-Trap System

Target Compound Results Summary

AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds

Measuring Environmental Volatile Organic Compounds by U.S. EPA Method 8260B with Headspace Trap GC/MS

Electronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical Model of Analyte Uptake by Permeation Passive Samplers

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 1 of 5

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

Associates. Project No.: October 25, 2017

Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air

Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File

McCAMPBELL ANALYTICAL INC Willow Pass Road Pittsburg CA

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California

Thermal Desorption Technical Support

R.E.A.C.T. Roxbury Environmental Action CoaliTion P.O. Box 244 Ledgewood, N.J Website:

METHOD 5021 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN SOILS AND OTHER SOLID MATRICES USING EQUILIBRIUM HEADSPACE ANALYSIS

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

Volatile Organic Compounds in Water PBM

Date Issued: April 01, 2013 Expiration Date: June 30, 2013

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: SDG Number: Job Description: Joint Base Cape Cod

Optimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS

Laboratory Report Number(s) Lone Tree Road (Deep) 10/5/15, 10/19/15, 6/13/16. Address Sample Date(s) Analyses Requested

Enhanced Preconcentrator for the Analysis of Vapor Phase Volatile Organic Compounds

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Method 1624 Revision C Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GCMS

Table 1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Summary Table

In-Tube Extraction Sample Preparation for Gas Chromatography

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

317 Elm Street Milford, NH (603) Fax (603)

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Purgeable Organic Compounds (VOC s) in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

January 19, Dear Mr. Nightingale:

Chlorinated Compounds in Hydrocarbon Streams Using a Halogen Specific Detector (XSD)

Application Note 116 Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ

Appendix 2 Data Distributions for Contaminants in Water and Sediment Samples in Response to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, 2010

Certificate of Accreditation

Non-Potable Water A2LA Certificate

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

METHOD 5030C PURGE-AND-TRAP FOR AQUEOUS SAMPLES

Techniques for Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge-and-Trap/GC/MS Application

Detection of Environmental Contaminants Caused by the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico by GC and Hplc

/J~ GOLDER. Golder Associates Inc. golder.com. Project No April 25, 2018

Readiness thru Health

Certificate of Accreditation

Date: March 6, 2008 RWDI Reference #: W B Pages (Including Cover):

ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN WATER BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY USING NITROGEN PURGE GAS

Transcription:

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap is considered a mature technique, advances in methodology and refinement of instrumentation are still being developed. This application note presents suggested operating conditions for the 4760 purge and trap and the 4100 autosampler. Methodology A multi-point calibration from 2 to 200 ppb was run using the conditions listed below. Purge-and-Trap Eclipse 4760 P&T Sample Concentrator Trap Purge Gas Purge Time #10 trap; Tenax / Silica gel / CMS Zero grade Helium at 40 ml/min 11 min Sparge Mount Temperature 45 C Sample Temperature (purge) 45 C Sample Temperature (bake) 45 C Desorb Time Bake Time OI #10 Trap Temperature Water Management 0.5 min 4 min Transfer Line Temperature 140 C Six-port Valve Temperature 140 C Autosampler System Gas Purge Gas LV20 Pressure Loop-based Time Settings Ambient during purge 180 C during desorb pre-heat 190 C during desorb 210 C during bake 120 C during purge Ambient during desorb 240 C during bake 4100 Water/Soil Sample Processor Zero grade nitrogen Zero grade helium 8.0 psi Default Rinse Water 80 C Soil Sample Transfer 150 C Soil Oven 150 C Soil Lift Station 45 C Sample Type 4100 Sample Processor Methods Waters Soils Blanks Vial Cap Color Blue Yellow Green Needle Rinses 1 1 0 SAM A (µl) 5 5 5 SAM B (µl) 0 0 0 SAM C (µl) 0 0 0 SAM D (µl) 0 0 0 Purge Time (min) 11.0 11.0 11.0 Desorb Time (min) 0.5 0.5 0.5 P&T Rinses 2 1 0 Rinse Water Hot Hot Hot Water Stir Time (min) 0.0 Water Settle Time (sec) 0 Soil Add Water to Vial (#loops) Soil Pre-Heat Stir * 1 x 5 ml Yes Soil Pre-Heat/Purge Temp ( C) 45.0 Soil Stir During Purge Yes * Suggested initial volume in vial should be 5 ml and final volume 10 ml. 1

Gas Chromatograph Column Carrier Gas Inlet Temperature 250 C Inlet Liner Column Flow Rate Agilent 7890A Restek Rxi 624 Sil MS 30 meter, 0.25 mm ID, 1.4 µm df Zero grade helium Agilent Ultra Inert, 1 mm straight taper 0.8 ml/min Split Ratio 150:1 Oven Program Mass Spectrometer Mode Scans/Second 5.19 Solvent Delay Transfer Line Temperature Hold at 40 C for 1.5 min 16 C/minute to 180 C 40 C/minute to 220 C Hold at 220 C for 1.75 min Total GC Run is 13 min Agilent 5975C Scan 35-300 amu 1.05 min 250 C Source Temperature 300 C Quadrupole Temperature Draw Out Plate 200 C 6 mm Results Results are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Calibration Data 1 pentafluorobenzene (IS) 2 dichlorodifluoromethane 0.401 3.75 0.392 9.58 3 chloromethane 0.352 4.58 0.323 6.51 4 vinyl chloride 0.386 4.11 0.354 6.94 5 bromomethane 0.313 9.54 0.290 8.33 6 chloroethane 0.168 6.97 0.155 7.79 7 trichlorofluoromethane 0.537 5.51 0.601 7.61 8 ethyl ether 0.158 5.15 0.142 5.03 9 1,1-dichloroethene 0.338 2.44 0.342 7.06 10 carbon disulfide 0.740 6.22 0.867 6.30 11 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 0.356 2.94 0.353 10.12 12 methyl iodide 0.640 4.73 0.714 8.20 13 allyl chloride 0.170 4.80 0.161 7.11 14 methylene chloride 0.336 2.64 0.370 8.25 15 acetone 0.042 14.66 0.023 6.35 16 trans-1,2-dichloroethene 0.403 1.58 0.389 7.48 17 methyl tert-butyl ether 0.907 4.80 0.799 6.85 2

18 acetonitrile 0.023 14.19 0.020 11.03 19 chloroprene 0.621 5.28 0.603 7.74 20 1,1-dichloroethane 0.687 2.92 0.671 7.23 21 acrylonitrile 0.185 12.25 0.111 10.79 22 cis-1,2-dichloroethene 0.465 2.10 0.454 7.71 23 2,2-dichloropropane 0.228 3.85 0.264 6.57 24 bromochloromethane 0.243 3.87 0.233 7.67 25 chloroform 0.792 2.36 0.774 7.35 26 methyl acrylate 0.471 5.23 0.267 6.79 27 carbon tetrachloride 0.559 2.11 0.562 6.66 28 dibromofluoromethane (SS) 0.512 1.71 0.536 1.40 29 1,1,1-trichloroethane 0.555 3.05 0.562 5.45 30 2-butanone 0.054 7.83 0.026 6.82 31 1,1-dichloropropene 0.528 1.38 0.502 7.47 32 1,4-difluorobenzene (IS) 33 benzene 0.994 1.24 0.937 13.41 34 methacrylonitrile 0.186 6.84 0.107 9.40 35 1,2-dichloroethane-d4 (SS) 0.049 2.03 0.045 4.82 36 1,2-dichloroethane 0.424 4.20 0.375 14.86 37 trichloroethene 0.316 2.27 0.288 8.24 38 dibromomethane 0.228 1.75 0.184 7.79 39 bromodichloromethane 0.378 4.71 0.353 5.92 40 1,2-dichloropropane 0.257 3.17 0.239 7.06 41 methyl methacrylate 0.192 3.45 0.109 6.81 42 2-chloroethyl-vinyl-ether 0.197 5.82 0.117 6.70 43 cis-1,3-dichloropropene 0.365 8.68 0.322 7.36 44 chlorobenzene-d5 (IS) 45 toluene-d8(ss) 1.311 1.50 1.362 1.33 46 toluene 0.794 1.50 0.779 8.01 47 2-nitropropane 0.122 13.55 0.061 9.80 48 4-methyl-2-pentanone 0.042 4.64 0.022 5.03 49 tetrachloroethene 0.357 5.18 0.330 5.83 50 trans-1,3-dichloropropene 0.392 12.20 0.337 10.61 51 ethyl methacrylate 0.352 7.57 0.245 7.63 52 1,1,2-trichloroethane 0.286 2.54 0.237 6.97 53 chlorodibromomethane 0.394 7.02 0.350 6.90 54 1,3-dichloropropane 0.414 1.35 0.339 5.98 55 1,2-dibromoethane 0.420 2.33 0.306 5.49 56 2-hexanone 0.358 2.99 0.157 4.80 57 chlorobenzene 1.001 1.00 0.928 7.64 58 ethylbenzene 1.546 1.70 1.435 6.83 59 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane 0.288 3.61 0.286 5.96 60 m,p-xylenes 0.616 2.18 0.577 6.30 3

61 o-xylene 0.590 3.60 0.560 6.36 62 styrene 1.004 4.24 0.929 4.49 63 bromoform 0.283 11.99 0.210 7.89 64 isopropylbenzene 1.452 4.26 1.374 5.03 65 cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.160 6.81 0.089 5.45 66 1,4-dichlorobenzene-d4 (IS) 67 4-bromofluorobenzene (SS) 1.066 2.22 1.087 3.23 68 bromobenzene 0.936 2.79 0.893 9.38 69 n-propylbenzene 3.831 2.58 3.739 7.87 70 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 1.048 2.43 0.700 6.51 71 2-chlorotoluene 2.213 2.34 2.146 7.98 72 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 2.695 3.00 2.657 5.87 73 1,2,3-trichloropropane 1.150 6.62 0.660 7.72 74 trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.323 4.85 0.187 5.19 75 4-chlorotoluene 2.606 3.19 2.545 8.58 76 tert-butylbenzene 2.552 2.65 2.531 7.63 77 pentachloroethane 0.382 7.85 0.415 7.73 78 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 2.728 3.31 2.658 5.89 79 sec-butylbenzene 3.321 2.77 3.250 5.77 80 p-isopropytoluene 2.686 4.08 2.620 5.32 81 1,3-dichlorobenzene 1.521 2.37 1.468 8.27 82 1,4-dichlorobenzene 1.530 1.06 1.468 8.67 83 n-butylbenzene 2.521 6.02 2.461 5.66 84 1,2-dichlorobenzene 1.429 1.98 1.343 6.52 85 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.204 12.57 0.096 9.28 86 hexachlorobutadiene 0.526 5.22 0.573 5.60 87 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 0.983 6.87 0.941 6.18 88 naphthalene 2.866 13.02 1.872 8.90 89 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene 0.940 7.24 0.872 6.66 4

Figure 1. Liquid Standard (50 ppb) Figure 2. Solid Standard (50 ppb) Conclusions Calibrations were generated using USEPA Method 8260. All method criteria were met. Publication 42910416 5