SOME INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES OF GRÜSS TYPE

Similar documents
AN INEQUALITY OF OSTROWSKI TYPE AND ITS APPLICATIONS FOR SIMPSON S RULE AND SPECIAL MEANS. I. Fedotov and S. S. Dragomir

RGMIA Research Report Collection, Vol. 1, No. 1, SOME OSTROWSKI TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR N-TIME DIFFERENTIA

WENJUN LIU AND QUÔ C ANH NGÔ

0 N. S. BARNETT AND S. S. DRAGOMIR Using Gruss' integrl inequlity, the following pertured trpezoid inequlity in terms of the upper nd lower ounds of t

S. S. Dragomir. 2, we have the inequality. b a

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

TRAPEZOIDAL TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR n TIME DIFFERENTIABLE FUNCTIONS

LOGARITHMIC INEQUALITIES FOR TWO POSITIVE NUMBERS VIA TAYLOR S EXPANSION WITH INTEGRAL REMAINDER

ON PERTURBED TRAPEZOIDAL AND MIDPOINT RULES. f (t) dt

S. S. Dragomir. 1. Introduction. In [1], Guessab and Schmeisser have proved among others, the following companion of Ostrowski s inequality:

INEQUALITIES FOR TWO SPECIFIC CLASSES OF FUNCTIONS USING CHEBYSHEV FUNCTIONAL. Mohammad Masjed-Jamei

NEW INEQUALITIES OF SIMPSON S TYPE FOR s CONVEX FUNCTIONS WITH APPLICATIONS. := f (4) (x) <. The following inequality. 2 b a

A Companion of Ostrowski Type Integral Inequality Using a 5-Step Kernel with Some Applications

SOME INEQUALITIES FOR THE DISPERSION OF A RANDOM VARIABLE WHOSE PDF IS DEFINED ON A FINITE INTERVAL

New Integral Inequalities for n-time Differentiable Functions with Applications for pdfs

AN INEQUALITY OF GRÜSS TYPE FOR RIEMANN-STIELTJES INTEGRAL AND APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL MEANS

ON THE WEIGHTED OSTROWSKI INEQUALITY

Improvement of Grüss and Ostrowski Type Inequalities

Keywords : Generalized Ostrowski s inequality, generalized midpoint inequality, Taylor s formula.

A Generalized Inequality of Ostrowski Type for Twice Differentiable Bounded Mappings and Applications

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Improvements of some Integral Inequalities of H. Gauchman involving Taylor s Remainder

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 28 Jan 2013

QUADRATURE is an old-fashioned word that refers to

Some Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for functions whose exponentials are convex

GENERALIZATIONS OF WEIGHTED TRAPEZOIDAL INEQUALITY FOR MONOTONIC MAPPINGS AND ITS APPLICATIONS. (b a)3 [f(a) + f(b)] f x (a,b)

Some estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions

ON AN INTEGRATION-BY-PARTS FORMULA FOR MEASURES

INNER PRODUCT INEQUALITIES FOR TWO EQUIVALENT NORMS AND APPLICATIONS

f (a) + f (b) f (λx + (1 λ)y) max {f (x),f (y)}, x, y [a, b]. (1.1)

ON COMPANION OF OSTROWSKI INEQUALITY FOR MAPPINGS WHOSE FIRST DERIVATIVES ABSOLUTE VALUE ARE CONVEX WITH APPLICATIONS

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

OPIAL S INEQUALITY AND OSCILLATION OF 2ND ORDER EQUATIONS. 1. Introduction We consider the second-order linear differential equation.

Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas Volumen 41 (2007), páginas 1 13

Research Article On New Inequalities via Riemann-Liouville Fractional Integration

ON THE INEQUALITY OF THE DIFFERENCE OF TWO INTEGRAL MEANS AND APPLICATIONS FOR PDFs

INEQUALITIES FOR BETA AND GAMMA FUNCTIONS VIA SOME CLASSICAL AND NEW INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES

Communications inmathematicalanalysis Volume 6, Number 2, pp (2009) ISSN

APPROXIMATING THE RIEMANN-STIELTJES INTEGRAL BY A TRAPEZOIDAL QUADRATURE RULE WITH APPLICATIONS

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

Research Article On The Hadamard s Inequality for Log-Convex Functions on the Coordinates

Problem Set 4: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

INEQUALITIES OF HERMITE-HADAMARD S TYPE FOR FUNCTIONS WHOSE DERIVATIVES ABSOLUTE VALUES ARE QUASI-CONVEX

Ostrowski Grüss Čebyšev type inequalities for functions whose modulus of second derivatives are convex 1

Generalized Hermite-Hadamard-Fejer type inequalities for GA-convex functions via Fractional integral

A unified generalization of perturbed mid-point and trapezoid inequalities and asymptotic expressions for its error term

Calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and fractional integrals

p-adic Egyptian Fractions

Improvement of Ostrowski Integral Type Inequalities with Application

DEFINITE INTEGRALS. f(x)dx exists. Note that, together with the definition of definite integrals, definitions (2) and (3) define b

Integral inequalities

Parametrized inequality of Hermite Hadamard type for functions whose third derivative absolute values are quasi convex

AN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN NUMERICAL INTEGRATION

Bulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society

The Hadamard s inequality for quasi-convex functions via fractional integrals

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

Farey Fractions. Rickard Fernström. U.U.D.M. Project Report 2017:24. Department of Mathematics Uppsala University

An optimal 3-point quadrature formula of closed type and error bounds

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

GENERALIZED ABSTRACTED MEAN VALUES

Polynomial Approximations for the Natural Logarithm and Arctangent Functions. Math 230

EÜFBED - Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Cilt-Sayı: 3-1 Yıl:

Notes on length and conformal metrics

ODE: Existence and Uniqueness of a Solution

2.4 Linear Inequalities and Interval Notation

INEQUALITIES FOR GENERALIZED WEIGHTED MEAN VALUES OF CONVEX FUNCTION

I1 = I2 I1 = I2 + I3 I1 + I2 = I3 + I4 I 3

On the Generalized Weighted Quasi-Arithmetic Integral Mean 1

LYAPUNOV-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS INVOLVING THE (p 1, p 2,..., p n )-LAPLACIAN

Bounds for the Riemann Stieltjes integral via s-convex integrand or integrator

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 11 Jul 2011

ON CLOSED CONVEX HULLS AND THEIR EXTREME POINTS. S. K. Lee and S. M. Khairnar

Section 4: Integration ECO4112F 2011

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

Math 360: A primitive integral and elementary functions

The practical version

Lecture 3: Curves in Calculus. Table of contents

Phil Wertheimer UMD Math Qualifying Exam Solutions Analysis - January, 2015

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

u(t)dt + i a f(t)dt f(t) dt b f(t) dt (2) With this preliminary step in place, we are ready to define integration on a general curve in C.

10 Vector Integral Calculus

Chapter 6 Notes, Larson/Hostetler 3e

SOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL (1 + µ(f n )) f(x) =. But we don t need the exact bound.) Set

FRACTIONAL DYNAMIC INEQUALITIES HARMONIZED ON TIME SCALES

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2013 Anant Sahai Lecture 17

Lecture 3. In this lecture, we will discuss algorithms for solving systems of linear equations.

A basic logarithmic inequality, and the logarithmic mean

New Expansion and Infinite Series

Mathematics. Area under Curve.

Review of Calculus, cont d

Abstract inner product spaces

Math 259 Winter Solutions to Homework #9

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Multiple Positive Solutions for the System of Higher Order Two-Point Boundary Value Problems on Time Scales

Euler, Ioachimescu and the trapezium rule. G.J.O. Jameson (Math. Gazette 96 (2012), )

NON-NEWTONIAN IMPROPER INTEGRALS

OSTROWSKI AND TRAPEZOID TYPE INEQUALITIES RELATED TO POMPEIU S MEAN VALUE THEOREM WITH COMPLEX EXPONENTIAL WEIGHT

Transcription:

RGMIA Reserch Report Collection, Vol., No., 998 http://sci.vut.edu.u/ rgmi SOME INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES OF GRÜSS TYPE S.S. DRAGOMIR Astrct. Some clssicl nd new integrl inequlities of Grüss type re presented. Grüss Integrl Inequlity In 935, G. Grüss, proved the following integrl inequlity which gives n estimtion for the integrl of product in terms of the product of integrls (see for emple [, p. 96]) f () g () d f () d g () d (Φ ϕ) (Γ γ) ; 4 provided tht f nd g re two integrle functions on [, ] nd stisfying the condition (.) ϕ f () Φ, γ g () Γ for ll [, ]. The constnt 4 is the est possile nd is chieved for f () g () sgn ( ) +. We give here weighted version of Grüss inequlity Theorem.. Let f nd g e two functions defined nd integrle on [, ]. If (.) holds for ech [, ], where ϕ, Φ, γ, Γ re given rel constnts, nd h : [, ] [0, ) is integrle nd h()d > 0, then (.) h()d f () g () h()d f () h()d g () h()d (Φ ϕ) (Γ γ) 4 h()d nd the constnt 4 is the est possile. For the ske of completeness we give here simple proof of this fct which is similr with the clssicl one for unweighted cse (compre with [, p. 96]). Dte. Decemer, 998 99 Mthemtics Suject Clssifiction. Primry 6D5. Key words nd phrses. Grüss Inequlity, Cey sev Inequlity, Hölder Inequlity

96 Drgomir Let us note tht the following equlity is vlid: (.3) h()d f () g () h()d (.4) ( f () h()d h()d h()d ) h()d g () h()d (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) h()h(y)ddy. Applying Cuchy-Bunikowski-Schwrz s integrl inequlity for doule integrls we hve ( h()d ) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) h()h(y)ddy ( h()d ) (f () f (y)) h()h(y)ddy ( h()d ) f () h()d h()d g () h()d h()d (g () g (y)) h()h(y)ddy h()d h()d f () h()d The following equlity lso holds f () h()d h()d h()d g () h()d. f () h()d

Grüss Integrl Inequlities 97 Φ h()d f () h()d h()d h()d (Φ f ()) (f () ϕ) h()d. As, (Φ f ()) (f () ϕ) 0 for ech [, ], then (.5) Φ h()d f () h()d h()d f () h()d Similrly, we hve (.6) Γ h()d g () h()d h()d g () h()d h()d f () h()d ϕ f () h()d h()d h()d f () h()d ϕ. g () h()d h()d Now, y (.3), (.4), (.5) nd (.6) we get (.7) f () g () h()d h()d Φ h()d f () h()d h()d f () h()d h()d g () h()d γ. g () h()d h()d f () h()d ϕ

98 Drgomir Γ h()d g () h()d h()d g () h()d γ. Using the elementry inequlity for rel numers: 4pq (p + q), p, q R we cn stte 4 Φ (.8) h()d f () h()d h()d f () h()d ϕ (Φ ϕ) nd (.9) 4 Γ h()d g () h()d h()d g () h()d γ (Γ γ). Now, comining (.7) with (.8) nd (.9) we deduce the desired inequlity (.). To prove the shrpness of (.), let choose h(), f () g () sgn ( ) + for ll [, ]. Then f () d, f () d g () d 0, Φ ϕ Γ γ nd the equlity in (.) is relized. For other inequlities of Grüss type see the ook [], where mny other references re given. We omit the detils.

Grüss Integrl Inequlities 99 The Cse When Both Mppings Are Lipschitzin The following inequlity of Grüss type for lipschitzin mppings holds : Theorem.. Let f, g : [, ] R e two lipschitzin mppings with the constnts L > 0 nd L > 0, i.e., (.) f () f (y) L y, g () g (y) L y for ll, y [, ]. If p : [, ] [0, ) is integrle, then (.) p () d p () f () g () d p () f () d p () g () d L L nd the inequlity is shrp. Proof. By (.) we hve tht p () d p () d p () d (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) L L ( y) for ll, y [, ]. Multiplying y p () p (y) 0 nd integrting on [, ], we get p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy nd L L As it is esy to see tht p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy p () p (y) ( y) ddy. (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) p () p (y) ddy p () d p () f () g () d p () p (y) ( y) ddy p () d p () f () d p () d p () g () d p () d the inequlity (.) is thus otined. Now, if we chose f () L, g () L, then f is L lipschitzin, g is L lipschitzin nd the equlity in (.) is relized for ny p s ove.

00 Drgomir Corollry.. Under the ove ssumptions, we hve f () g () d (.3) f () d g () d The constnt is the est possile. L L ( ). We note tht the ove corollry is nturl generliztion of well-known result y Cey sev (see for emple [, p. 97]) : Corollry.3. Let f, g : [, ] R e two differentile mppings whose derivtives re ounded on (, ). Denote f f (t) <. Then we hve the inequlity: (.4) sup t (,) f () g () d f () d g () d The constnt is the est possile. f g ( ). 3 The Cse When f Is Lipschitzin We re le now to prove nother inequlity of Grüss type ssuming tht only one mpping is lipschitzin s follows: Theorem 3.. Let f : [, ] R e M lipschitzin mpping on [, ]. Then we hve the inequlity: f () g () d (3.) f () d g () d M g provided tht g L [, ] [ M (p + ) (p + ) ] p ( ) p g q provided tht g L q [, ] p > nd p + q ; Proof. We hve tht ( )3 M g 3 provided tht g L [, ]. f () g (y) f (y) g (y) M y g (y) for ll, y [, ], from where, y integrtion on [, ], we get tht (f () g (y) f (y) g (y)) ddy M y g (y) ddy.

Grüss Integrl Inequlities 0 But (f () g (y) f (y) g (y)) ddy Now, if g L [, ], then f () d g () d ( ) y g (y) ddy ( ) m y g (y) dy ( ) g. (,y) [,] f () g () d. Now, ssume tht p > nd p + q, g L q [, ]. Then y Hölder s integrl inequlity we hve: where nd then we get p y p ddy K : y g (y) ddy y p ddy g (y) q ddy y p dy + q y p dy d y p dy d [ ] ( ) p+ + ( ) p+ d p + [ y g (y) ddy (p + ) (p + ) Finlly, ssuming tht g L [, ], we hve tht The theorem is thus proved. y g (y) ddy g The following corollry is importnt in pplictions. y ddy K p ( ) q g q ( )p+ (p + ) (p + ) ] p ( ) + p g q. ( )3 3 g. Corollry 3.. Let f : [, ] R e differentile mpping whose derivtive is ounded on (, ). Then we hve the inequlity: f () g () d (3.) f () d g () d

0 Drgomir f g provided tht g L [, ] [ ] p ( ) p f (p + ) (p + ) g q provided tht g L q [, ] p >, p + q ; ( ) 3 f g provided tht g L [, ]. 4 The Cse When f Is M g-lipschitzin Another generliztion of Grüss integrl inequlity is emodied in the following theorem: Theorem 4.. Let f, g : [, ] R e two integrle mppings on [, ] such tht (4.) f () f (y) M g () g (y) for ll, y [, ]. Then we hve the inequlity: (4.) p () d M p () f () g () d p () d p () g () d p () f () d p () g () d p () g () d where p : [, ] [0, ) is n ritrry integrle function on [, ]. The inequlity (4.) is shrp. Proof. By condition (4.) we hve (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) M (g () g (y)) for ll, y [, ]. Multiplying y p () p (y) 0 nd integrting on [, ] we get p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy M p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy p () p (y) (g () g (y)) ddy which is clerly equivlent to (4.). Now, if we choose f () M, g (), then the equlity in the ove inequlity is relized for ny p s ove. The following corollry is importnt for pplictions.

Grüss Integrl Inequlities 03 Corollry 4.. Let f, g : [, ] R e two differentile mppings with g () 0 on (, ) nd there eists constnt M > 0 so tht: f (4.3) () g () M for ll (, ). Then we hve the inequlity (4.).The inequlity is shrp. Proof. Use the Cuchy s men vlue theorem, i.e., for every, y [, ] with y, there eists c etween nd y so tht Consequently, for ech, y [, ] we hve f () f (y) g () g (y) f (c) g (c). f () f (y) M g () g (y) i.e., (4.) holds. Applying Theorem 4., we get (4.3). Remrk 4.. Under the ssumption of Corollry 4. we cn choose M ssuming tht the norm is finite. sup (,) f () g () f g, Remrk 4.. If f, g re s in the ove theorem, then we hve the inequlity (4.4) M f () g () d f () d g () d g () d nd the inequlity is shrp.. If f, g re s in Corollry 4., then we hve the inequlity f g nd the inequlity is shrp. f () g () d g () d f () d g () d g () d g () d 5 The Cse When Both Mppings Are of Hölder Type In this section we point out Grüss type inequlity for mppings stisfying the condition of Hölder s follows :

04 Drgomir Theorem 5.. Suppose tht f is of r Hölder type nd g is of s Hölder, i.e., (5.) f () f (y) H y r nd g () g (y) H y s for ll, y [, ], where H, H > 0 nd r, s (0, ] re fied. Then we hve the inequlity: f () g () d (5.) f () d g () d Proof. By the ssumption (5.) we hve for ll, y [, ]. Integrting on [, ] we get H H ( ) r+s (r + s + ) (r + s + ). (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) H H y r+s (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy Now, we oserve tht : nd s (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy H H y r+s ddy y r+s dy d ( y) r+s dy + y r+s ddy. (y ) r+s dy d [ ] ( ) r+s+ + ( ) r+s+ d r + s + ( ) r+s+ (r + s + ) (r + s + ) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy ( ) we get the desired inequlity (5.). f () g () d f () d g () d

Grüss Integrl Inequlities 05 6 The Cse When f nd g Belong to Some L p -Spces In this section we point out some inequlities of Grüss type for differentile mppings whose derivtives elong firstly to L (, ), then to L p (, ) (p > ) nd finlly to L (, ). Theorem 6.. Let f, g : [, ] R e two differentile mppings on (, ) nd p : [, ] [0, ) is integrle on [, ]. If f, g L (, ), then we hve the inequlity (6.) p () d p () f () g () d f g p () p (y) Moreover, the inequlity (6.)is shrp. p () d f (t) dt p () f () d p () d Proof. Let oserve tht for ny, y [, ] we hve tht (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) As f, g L (, ), then we hve f (t) dt g (z) dz ddy p () g () d p () d. f (t) g (z) dtdz. p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) g (z) dz p () p (y) f g ( y) p () p (y) for ll, y [, ]. By the properties of the modulus, we hve (6.) p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy p () p (y) f (t) dt g (z) dz ddy f g ( y) p () p (y) ddy, from where we get the desired inequlity (6.).

06 Drgomir To prove the shrpness of (6.), let consider the mppings f () α +, g () γ + δ (α, γ > 0,, δ R) on [, ]. A simple clcultion gives p () d p () f () g () d p () p (y) f g αγ f (t) dt p () d ( y) p () p (y) ddy p () f () d g (z) dz ddy p () d which proves tht we cn hve equlity in ll inequlities in (6.). p () g () d p () d The following corollry holds. Corollry 6.. With the ove ssumptions on the mppings f, g, we hve : f () g () d (6.3) f () d g () d f (t) dt The constnts nd, respectively, re the est possile. g (z) dz ddy f g ( ). Remrk 6.. We shll show tht some time the estimtion given y clssicl Grüss inequlity for the difference f () g () d f () d g () d is etter thn the estimtion (6.3) nd some other time the other wy round. Let f, g : [0, ] [0, ) given y f () p, g () q, p, q >. Then ϕ inf f () 0, Φ sup f () ; [0,] [0,] Also we hve γ inf g () 0, Γ sup g (). [0,] [0,] f () p p, g () q q, [0, ]

Grüss Integrl Inequlities 07 nd oviously f p, g q. Now, we oserve tht nd 4 (Φ ϕ) (Γ γ) 4 f g ( ) pq. Consequently, if pq > 3, then the ound provided y Grüss inequlity is etter thn the ound provided y (6.3). If pq < 3 (p, q > ) then (6.3) is etter thn (.). Remrk 6.. The inequlity (6.3) is lso refinement of Čey sev s inequlity emodied in Corollry.. The following theorem lso holds Theorem 6.3. Let f, g : [, ] R e two differentile mppings on (, ) nd p : [, ] [0, ) is integrle on [, ]. If f L α (, ), g L (, ) with α > nd α +, then we hve the inequlity (6.4) p () d p () f () g () d p () f () d p () g () d p () p (y) y p () p (y) y f α g Note tht, the first inequlity in (6.4) is shrp. f (t) α dt ddy g (t) α dt ddy y p () p (y) ddy. Proof. Using Hölder s inequlity for doule integrls, we hve f (t) g (z) dtdz y α y α f (t) α dtdz f (t) α dt α α f (t) α dt g (z) dtdz y g (t) dt α g (z) α dz.

08 Drgomir Now, s in the proof of Theorem 6., we hve : p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy p () p (y) p () p (y) y f (t) g (z) dtdz ddy α f (t) α dt Using gin Hölder s inequlity for doule integrls, we hve (6.5) nd, s p () p (y) y α f (t) α dt p () p (y) y p () p (y) y g (z) dz g (z) dz f (t) α dt ddy g (z) dz ddy α ddy. ddy (6.6) p () p (y) (f () f (y)) (g () g (y)) ddy p () d p () f () g () d p () f () d the inequlity (6.5) nd (6.6) provide the first inequlity in (6.4). Now, let oserve tht f (t) α dt f α α, y g (z) dz g for ll, y [, ], nd then p () p (y) y f (t) α dt ddy p () g () d α

Grüss Integrl Inequlities 09 f α f α g p () p (y) y p () p (y) y ddy α p () p (y) y ddy g (z) dt ddy g p () p (y) y ddy nd the second inequlity in (6.4) is lso proved. For the shrpness of the first inequlity in (6.4), let consider the mppings f, g : [, ] R, f () m + n, g () s + z with m, t > 0. Then, oviously p () d p () f () g () d p () f () d p () g () d ms p () p (y) ( y) ddy nd then f (t) α dt mα y, p () p (y) y g (z) dz s y f (t) α dt ddy α ms ms p () p (y) y p () p (y) y ddy p () p (y) ( y) ddy α g (z) dz ddy nd the equlity is relized in the first inequlity in (6.4). The following corollry holds. p () p (y) y ddy

0 Drgomir Corollry 6.4. Let f, g e s ove. Then we hve the inequlity f () g () d (6.7) f () d g () d ( ) ( ) y y f (t) α dt ddy g (t) dt ddy α The first inequlity in (6.7) is shrp. 6 f α g ( ). In similr wy we cn prove the following theorem: Theorem 6.5. Let f, g : [, ] R e two differentile mppings on (, ). If f L (, ) nd g L (, ) then we hve the inequlities: (6.8) p () d p () f () g () d p () f () d p () g () d p () p (y) y sup f (t) t [,y] g (z) dz ddy f g The first inequlity in (6.8) is shrp. The following corollry lso holds. p () p (y) y ddy. Corollry 6.6. Under the ove ssumptions for the mppings f nd g, we hve f () g () d (6.9) f () d g () d ( ) p () p (y) y sup f (t) t [,y] g (z) dz ddy The first inequlity in (6.9) is shrp. 6 f g ( ).

Grüss Integrl Inequlities Remrk 6.3. We note tht some time the upper ound provided y (6.4) is etter thn the upper ound given y (6.8) nd other time, the other wy round. Indeed, choosing f, g : [0, ] R, f () p, g () q (p, q > ) we hve f () p p, g () q q, f p, g, f p α [α (p ) + ] α nd g q q [ (q ) + ] where α, > nd α +. Also, let A : 6 f g ( ) p 6 nd B : 6 f α g pq ( ). 6 [α (p ) + ] α [ (q ) + ] If we choose α, we get A B [(p + ) (q + )] q which cn e greter or less thn for different vlues of p, q >. [] References MITRINOVIĆ, D.S. ; PEČARIĆ, J.E. ; FINK, A.M. ; Clssicl nd New Inequlities in Anlysis, Kluwer Acdemic Pulishers, Dordrecht, 993. School of Communictions nd Informtics, Victori University of Technology, PO Bo 448, Melourne City MC, Victori 800, Austrli. E-mil ddress: sever@mtild.vut.edu.u