Neutrosophic Bi-LA-Semigroup and Neutrosophic N-LA- Semigroup

Similar documents
Soft Neutrosophic Bi-LA-semigroup and Soft Neutrosophic N-LA-seigroup

Smooth Neutrosophic Topological Spaces

SUPER PRINCIPAL FIBER BUNDLE WITH SUPER ACTION

INTERVAL SEMIGROUPS. W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy Florentin Smarandache

Subset Topological Spaces and Kakutani s Theorem

Neutrosophic Left Almost Semigroup

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

Smarandache-Zero Divisors in Group Rings

A CHARACTERIZATION OF ADDITIVE DERIVATIONS ON VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS

Binomial transforms of the modified k-fibonacci-like sequence

SMARANDACHE-GALOIS FIELDS

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

P.P. PROPERTIES OF GROUP RINGS. Libo Zan and Jianlong Chen

n-strongly Ding Projective, Injective and Flat Modules

THE RING AND ALGEBRA OF INTUITIONISTIC SETS

Discrete Mathematics. Laplacian spectral characterization of some graphs obtained by product operation

Errors in Nobel Prize for Physics (7) Improper Schrodinger Equation and Dirac Equation

Matrix-Norm Aggregation Operators

Complement of Type-2 Fuzzy Shortest Path Using Possibility Measure

The lower and upper bounds on Perron root of nonnegative irreducible matrices

CHAPTER-5 INFORMATION MEASURE OF FUZZY MATRIX AND FUZZY BINARY RELATION

A New Approach to Multi-spaces Through the Application

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

The binomial transforms of the generalized (s, t )-Jacobsthal matrix sequence

The Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal-Lucas Numbers via Square Roots of Matrices

A CLASS OF RECURSIVE SETS. Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico 200 College Road Gallup, NM 87301, USA

Group Theory Worksheet

On the correction of the h-index for career length

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

General viscosity iterative method for a sequence of quasi-nonexpansive mappings

Comparative Studies of Law of Conservation of Energy. and Law Clusters of Conservation of Generalized Energy

Modulo Magic Labeling in Digraphs

Genericity of Critical Types

Power law and dimension of the maximum value for belief distribution with the max Deng entropy

Redesigning Decision Matrix Method with an indeterminacy-based inference process

The Pseudoblocks of Endomorphism Algebras

Volume 18 Figure 1. Notation 1. Notation 2. Observation 1. Remark 1. Remark 2. Remark 3. Remark 4. Remark 5. Remark 6. Theorem A [2]. Theorem B [2].

12 MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I, PART C: MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA. 4. Tensor product

More metrics on cartesian products

20. Mon, Oct. 13 What we have done so far corresponds roughly to Chapters 2 & 3 of Lee. Now we turn to Chapter 4. The first idea is connectedness.

The L(2, 1)-Labeling on -Product of Graphs

COMPARISON OF SOME RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN REDUNDANT SYSTEMS REQUIRING SUPPORTING UNITS FOR THEIR OPERATIONS

LEVEL SET OF INTUITIONTISTIC FUZZY SUBHEMIRINGS OF A HEMIRING

Neutrosophic Ideals of Γ-Semirings

Some Concepts on Constant Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Graphs

Spectrum of (, q)-fuzzy Prime h-ideals of a Hemiring

Semilattices of Rectangular Bands and Groups of Order Two.

A combinatorial proof of multiple angle formulas involving Fibonacci and Lucas numbers

On Tiling for Some Types of Manifolds. and their Folding

Ali Omer Alattass Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Hadramout University of science and Technology, P. O. Box 50663, Mukalla, Yemen

On the set of natural numbers

Affine transformations and convexity

GRA Method of Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Single Valued Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Set Information

Research Article Relative Smooth Topological Spaces

On the smoothness and the totally strong properties for nearness frames

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-3(3), 2012, Page: Available online through ISSN

The Degrees of Nilpotency of Nilpotent Derivations on the Ring of Matrices

On C 0 multi-contractions having a regular dilation

Amusing Properties of Odd Numbers Derived From Valuated Binary Tree

Erdős-Burgess constant of the multiplicative semigroup of the quotient ring off q [x]

Antipodal Interval-Valued Fuzzy Graphs

Self-complementing permutations of k-uniform hypergraphs

Taylor Series Approximation to Solve Neutrosophic Multi-objective Programming Problem

2 More examples with details

A P PL I CA TIONS OF FRACTIONAL EXTERIOR DI F F ER EN TIAL IN THR EE- DI M ENSIONAL S PAC E Ξ

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 17 Feb 2017

INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY CLOSED IDEALS OF BG-ALGEBRA AND THEIR PRODUCTS

On quasiperfect numbers

Continuous Time Markov Chain

Ideal Amenability of Second Duals of Banach Algebras

Appendix B. Criterion of Riemann-Stieltjes Integrability

EXPANSIVE MAPPINGS. by W. R. Utz

NOTES FOR QUANTUM GROUPS, CRYSTAL BASES AND REALIZATION OF ŝl(n)-modules

THE SUMMATION NOTATION Ʃ

Christian Aebi Collège Calvin, Geneva, Switzerland

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Randić Energy and Randić Estrada Index of a Graph

On Similarity Measures of Fuzzy Soft Sets

Root Structure of a Special Generalized Kac- Moody Algebra

A Simple Research of Divisor Graphs

International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 2014, no. 5, HIKARI Ltd,

Fuzzy Boundaries of Sample Selection Model

A New Algorithm for Finding a Fuzzy Optimal. Solution for Fuzzy Transportation Problems

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

THE CHVÁTAL-ERDŐS CONDITION AND 2-FACTORS WITH A SPECIFIED NUMBER OF COMPONENTS

Double Layered Fuzzy Planar Graph

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Polynomials. 1 More properties of polynomials

ON SEPARATING SETS OF WORDS IV

Using T.O.M to Estimate Parameter of distributions that have not Single Exponential Family

Problem Do any of the following determine homomorphisms from GL n (C) to GL n (C)?

CHAPTER 4. Vector Spaces

The Quadratic Trigonometric Bézier Curve with Single Shape Parameter

A Note on Bound for Jensen-Shannon Divergence by Jeffreys

INVARIANT STABLY COMPLEX STRUCTURES ON TOPOLOGICAL TORIC MANIFOLDS

The Parity of the Number of Irreducible Factors for Some Pentanomials

The Minimum Universal Cost Flow in an Infeasible Flow Network

Google PageRank with Stochastic Matrix

Transcription:

Neutrosophc Sets Systems, Vol. 4, 04 9 Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Neutrosophc N-LA- Semgroup Mumtaz Al *, Florentn Smarache, Muhammad Shabr 3 Munazza Naz 4,3 Department of Mathematcs, Quad--Azam Unversty, Islamabad, 44000,Pakstan. E-mal: mumtazal770@yahoo.com, mshabrbhatt@yahoo.co.uk Unversty of New Mexco, 705 Gurley Ave., Gallup, New Mexco 8730, USA E-mal: fsmarache@gmal.com 4 Department of Mathematcal Scences, Fatma Jnnah Women Unversty, The Mall, Rawalpnd, 46000, Pakstan. E-mal: munazzanaz@yahoo.com Abstract. In ths paper we defne neutrosophc b-lasemgroup neutrosophc N-LA-semgroup. Infact ths paper s an extenson of our prevous paper neutrosophc left almost semgroup shortly neutrosophc LAsemgroup. We also extend the neutrosophc deal to neutrosophc bdeal neutrosophc N-deal. We also fnd some new type of neutrosophc deal whch s related to the strong or pure part of neutrosophy. We have gven suffcent amount of examples to llustrate the theory of neutrosophc b-la-semgroup, neutrosophc N-LAsemgroup dsplay many propertes of them ths paper. Keywords: Neutrosophc LA-semgroup, neutrosophc deal, neutrosophc b-la-semgroup, neutrosophc bdeal, neutrosophc N-LA-semgroup, neutrosophc N-deal. Introducton Neutrosophy s a new branch of phlosophy whch studes the orgn features of neutraltes n the nature. Florentn Smarache n 980 frstly ntroduced the concept of neutrosophc logc where each proposton n neutrosophc logc s approxmated to have the percentage of truth n a subset T, the percentage of ndetermnacy n a subset I, the percentage of falsty n a subset F so that ths neutrosophc logc s called an extenson of fuzzy logc. In fact neutrosophc set s the generalzaton of classcal sets, con- n- ventonal fuzzy set, ntutonstc fuzzy set terval valued fuzzy set 3. Ths mathematcal tool s used to hle problems lke mprecse, ndetermnacy nconsstent data etc. By utlzng neutrosophc theory, Vasantha Kasamy Florentn Smarache dg out neutrosophc algebrac structures n. Some of them Kazm M. Naseeruddn 3 n 97. Ths structure s bascally a mdway structure between a groupod a commutatve semgroup. Ths structure s also termed as Able-Grassmann s groupod abbrevated as AG -groupod 6. Ths s a non assocatve non commutatve algebrac structure whch closely resemble to commutatve semgroup. The generalzaton of semgroup theory s an LA-semgroup ths structure has wde applcatons n collaboraton wth semgroup. We have tred to develop the deal theory of LAsemgroups n a logcal manner. Frstly, prelmnares basc concepts are gven for neutrosophc LA-semgroup. Then we presented the newly defned notons results n neutrosophc b-la-semgroups neutrosophc N- LA-semgroups. Varous types of neutrosophc bdeals neutrosophc N-deal are defned elaborated wth the help of examples. are neutrosophc felds, neutrosophc vector spaces, neutrosophc groups, neutrosophc bgroups, neutrosophc N- Prelmnares groups, neutrosophc semgroups, neutrosophc bsemgroups, neutrosophc N-semgroup, neutrosophc loops, S I a bi : a, b S. The neutrosophc LA- Defnton. Let S, be an LA-semgroup let neutrosophc bloops, neutrosophc N-loop, neutrosophc semgroup s generated by S I under denoted as groupods, neutrosophc bgroupods so on. N S S I,, where I s called the A left almost semgroup abbrevated as LA-semgroup s neutrosophc element wth property I I. For an an algebrac structure whch was ntroduced by M.A. nteger n, n I ni are neutrosophc elements Mumtaz Al, Florentn Smarache, Muhammad Shabr Munazza Naz, Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Neutrosophc N-LA-Semgroup

0 Neutrosophc Sets Systems, Vol. 4, 04 I 0. I 0., the nverse of I s not defned hence does not exst. Smlarly we can defne neutrosophc RA-semgroup on the same lnes. Defnton. Let NH be a proper subset of NS N H operaton of NS. N S be a neutrosophc LA-semgroup. Then s called a neutrosophc sub LA-semgroup f N H tself s a neutrosophc LA-semgroup under the Defnton 3. A neutrosophc sub LA-semgroup NH s called strong neutrosophc sub LA-semgroup or pure neutrosophc sub LA-semgroup f all the elements of N H are neutrosophc elements. Defnton 4. Let NK be a subset of NS. Then called Left (rght) neutrosophc deal of N S N K N K { N, K N S N K }. If N S be a neutrosophc LA-semgroup N K s N S f N K s both left rght neutrosophc deal, then N K s called a two sded neutrosophc deal or smply a neutrosophc deal. Defnton 5. A neutrosophc deal NK s called strong neutrosophc deal or pure neutrosophc deal f all of ts elements are neutrosophc elements. 3 Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Defnton 6. Let ( BN( S),, ) be a non-empty set wth two bnary operatons. ( BN( S),, ) s sad to BN( S) P P be a neutrosophc b-la-semgroup f where atleast one of ( P, ) or ( P, ) s a neutrosophc LA-semgroup other s just an LA- semgroup. P P are proper subsets of BN( S ). Smlarly we can defne neutrosophc b-ra-semgroup on the same lnes. Theorem. All neutrosophc b-la-semgroups contans the correspondng b-la-semgroups. Example. Let BN( S) { SI S I } be a neutrosophc b-la-semgroup where S I,,3,4, I, I,3 I,4I s a neutrosophc LA-semgroup wth the followng table. * 3 4 I I 3I 4I 4 3 I 4I I 3I 3 4 3I I 4I I 3 4 3 4I I 3I I 4 3 4 I 3I I 4I I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I S I,,3, I, I,3I be another neutrosophc b-la-semgroup wth the followng table. * 3 I I 3I 3 3 3 3I 3I 3I 3 3 3 3I 3I 3I 3 3 3 I 3I 3I I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I I 3I 3I I 3I 3I Defnton 7. Let ( BN( S) P P;:, ) be a neutrosophc b-la-semgroup. A proper subset ( T,, ) s sad to be a neutrosophc sub b-la-semgroup of BN( S ) f. T T T where T P T T PT (, ) ( T, ) s a neutrosoph-. At least one of T or c LA-semgroup. Example : BN( S ) be a neutrosophc b-lasemgroup n Example. Then P {, I} {3,3 I} Q {, I} {, I} are neutrosophc sub b-la-semgroups of BN( S ). Mumtaz Al, Florentn Smarache, Muhammad Shabr Munazza Naz, Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Neutrosophc N-LA-Semgroup

Neutrosophc Sets Systems, Vol. 4, 04 Theorem. Let BN S be a neutrosophc b-lasemgroup NH be a proper subset of BN S. Then NH s a neutrosophc sub b-la-semgroup of BN S f N H. N H N H. Defnton 8. Let ( BN( S) P P,, ) be any neutrosophc b-la-semgroup. Let J be a proper subset of BN( S ) such that J J P J J P are deals of P P respectvely. Then J s called the neutrosophc bdeal of BN( S ). Example 3. Let BN( S) { SI S I } be a neutrosophc b-la-semgroup, where S I,,3, I, I,3I be another neutrosophc b-la-semgroup wth the followng table. * 3 I I 3I 3 3 3 3I 3I 3I 3 3 3 3I 3I 3I 3 3 3 I 3I 3I I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I I 3I 3I I 3I 3I And S I I I I,,3,,,3 be another neutrosophc LA-semgroup wth the followng table.. 3 I I 3I 3 3 3I 3I I I I I 3 I I I I 3I 3I I 3I 3I I I I I I I I I 3I I I I I I I Then Q I I P,I,3,3 I {, I},,3,,3 {,3, I,3I} are neutrosophc bdeals of BN( S ). Proposton. Every neutrosophc bdeal of a neutrosophc b-la-semgroup s trvally a Neutrosophc sub b-la-semgroup but the conver s not true n general. One can easly see the converse by the help of example. 3 Neutrosophc Strong B-LA-Semgroup Defnton 9: If both ( P, ) ( P, ) n the Defnton 6. are neutrosophc strong LAsemgroups then we call ( BN( S),, ) s a neutrosophc strong b-la-semgroup. Defnton 0. Let ( BN( S) P P,, ) be a neutrosophc b-la-semgroup. A proper subset ( T,, ) s sad to be a neutrosophc strong sub b-la-semgroup of BN( S ) f. T T T where T P T T PT. ( T, ) ( T, ) are neutrosophc strong LA-semgroups. Example 4. Let BN( S ) be a neutrosophc b- LA-semgroup n Example 3. Then P I,3 I { I}, Q I,3 I{I,3I} are neutrosophc strong sub b- LA-semgroup of BN( S ). Theorem 4: Every neutrosophc strong sub b- LA-semgroup s a neutrosophc sub b-lasemgroup. Defnton. Let ( BN( S),, ) be a strong neutrosophc b-la-semgroup where BN( S) P P wth ( P, ) ( P, ) be any two neutrosophc LAsemgroups. Let J be a proper subset of BN( S ) where I I I wth I I P I I P are neutrosophc deals of the neutrosophc LA-semgroups P P respectvely. Then I s called or defned as the Mumtaz Al, Florentn Smarache, Muhammad Shabr Munazza Naz, Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Neutrosophc N-LA-Semgroup

Neutrosophc Sets Systems, Vol. 4, 04 neutrosophc strong bdeal of BN( S ). Theorem 5: Every neutrosophc strong bdeal s trvally a neutrosophc sub b-la-semgroup. Theorem 6: Every neutrosophc strong bdeal s a neutrosophc strong sub b-la-semgroup. Theorem 7: Every neutrosophc strong bdeal s a neutrosophc bdeal. Example 5. Let BN( S ) be a neutrosophc b-la semgroup n Example (*).Then P I,3 I { I}, Q I,3 I{I,3I} are neutrosophc strong bdeal of BN( S ). 4 Neutrosophc N-LA-Semgroup Defnton. Let { SN ( ),,..., } be a non-empty set wth N -bnary operatons defned on t. We call SN ( ) a neutrosophc N -LA-semgroup ( N a postve nteger) f the followng condtons are satsfed. ) S( N) S... SN where each S s a proper subset of SN ( ).e. S Sj or Sj S f j. ) ( S, ) s ether a neutrosophc LA-semgroup or an LA-semgroup for,,3,..., N. Example 6. Let S(N) {S SS 3,,, 3} be a neutrosophc 3-LA-semgroup where S,,3,4, I, I,3 I,4I s a neutrosophc LAsemgroup wth the followng table. * 3 4 I I 3I 4I 4 3 I 4I I 3I 3 4 3I I 4I I 3 4 3 4I I 3I I 4 3 4 I 3I I 4I I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I I 3I I 4I S,,3, I, I,3I be another neutrosophc b-lasemgroup wth the followng table. * 3 I I 3I 3 3 3 3I 3I 3I 3 3 3 3I 3I 3I 3 3 3 I 3I 3I I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I 3I I 3I 3I I 3I 3I And S I I I 3,,3,,,3 s another neutrosophc LAsemgroup wth the followng table.. 3 I I 3I 3 3 3I 3I I I I I 3 I I I I 3I 3I I 3I 3I I I I I I I I I 3I I I I I I I Theorem 8 All neutrosophc N-LA-semgroups contans the correspondng N-LA-semgroups. Defnton 3. Let S( N) { S S... S N,,,..., N } be a neutrosophc N -LA-semgroup. A proper subset P {P P...P,,,..., } of SN ( ) s sad N to be a neutrosophc sub N -LA-semgroup f P P S,,,..., N are sub LA-semgroups of S n whch atleast some of the sub LA-semgroups are neutrosophc sub LA-semgroups. Example 7: Let S(N) {S SS 3,,, 3} be a neutrosophc 3-LA-semgroup n above Example 6. Then clearly P {, I} {,3,3 I} {, I}, Q {, I} {,3, I,3 I} {,3, I,3I}, N Mumtaz Al, Florentn Smarache, Muhammad Shabr Munazza Naz, Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Neutrosophc N-LA-Semgroup

Neutrosophc Sets Systems, Vol. 4, 04 3 R {4,4 I} { I,3 I} {I,3I} are neutrosophc sub 3-LA-semgroups of S(N). Theorem 9. Let N( S ) be a neutrosophc N-LAsemgroup NH be a proper subset of N( S ). Then NH s a neutrosophc sub N-LA-semgroup of N( S ) f N H. N H N H. Defnton 4. Let S( N) { S S... S N,,,..., N } be a neutrosophc N -LA-semgroup. A proper subset P {P P... P N,,,..., N } of SN ( ) s sad to be a neutrosophc N -deal, f the followng condtons are true,. P s a neutrosophc sub N -LA-semgroup of SN ( ).. Each P S P,,,..., N s an deal of S. Example 8. Consder Example 6. Then I {, I} {3,3 I} {, I}, I {, I} { I,3 I} {,3,3I} are neutrosophc 3- deals of SN ( ). Theorem 0: Every neutrosophc N-deal s trvally a neutrosophc sub N-LA-semgroup but the converse s not true n general. One can easly see the converse by the help of example. 5 Neutrosophc Strong N-LA-Semgroup Defnton 5: If all the N -LA-semgroups ( S, ) n Defnton ( ) are neutrosophc strong LA-semgroups (.e. for,,3,..., N ) then we call SN ( ) to be a neutrosophc strong N -LA-semgroup. Defnton 6. Let S( N) { S S... S N,,,..., N } be a neutrosophc strong N -LA-semgroup. A proper subset T {T T... T,,,..., } of SN ( ) s N sad to be a neutrosophc strong sub N -LA-semgroup f each ( T, ) s a neutrosophc strong sub LA-semgroup of ( S, ) for,,..., N where T S T. Theorem : Every neutrosophc strong sub N-LAsemgroup s a neutrosophc sub N-LA-semgroup. N Defnton 7. Let S( N) { S S... S N,,,..., N } be a neutrosophc strong N -LA-semgroup. A proper subset J {J J...J,,,..., } where N Jt J St for t,,..., N s sad to be a neutrosophc strong N -deal of SN ( ) f the followng condtons are satsfed. ) Each t s a neutrosophc sub LA-semgroup of St, t,,..., N.e. It s a neutrosophc strong N- sub LA-semgroup of SN ( ). ) Each t s a two sded deal of S t for t,,..., N. Smlarly one can defne neutrosophc strong N -left deal or neutrosophc strong rght deal of SN ( ). A neutrosophc strong N -deal s one whch s both a neutrosophc strong N -left deal N -rght deal of SN ( ). Theorem : Every neutrosophc strong Ndeal s trvally a neutrosophc sub N-LA-semgroup. Theorem 3: Every neutrosophc strong N-deal s a neutrosophc strong sub N-LA-semgroup. Theorem 4: Every neutrosophc strong N-deal s a N- deal. Concluson In ths paper we extend neutrosophc LA-semgroup to neutrosophc b-la-semgroup neutrosophc N-LAsemgroup. The neutrosophc deal theory of neutrosophc LA-semgroup s extend to neutrosophc bdeal neutrosophc N-deal. Some new type of neutrosophc deals are dscovered whch s strongly neutrosophc or purely neutrosophc. Related examples are gven to llustrate neutrosophc b-la-semgroup, neutrosophc N-LAsemgroup many theorems propertes are dscussed. References [] M. Al, M.Shabr, M. Naz F. Smarache, Neutrosophc Left Almost Semgroup, Neutrosophc Sets Systems, 3 (04), 8-8. [] Florentn Smarache, A Unfyng Feld n Logcs. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophc Probablty, Set Logc. Rehoboth: Amercan Research Press, (999). [3] W. B. Vasantha Kasamy & Florentn Smarache, Some Neutrosophc Algebrac Structures Neutrosophc N-Algebrac Struc- N Mumtaz Al, Florentn Smarache, Muhammad Shabr Munazza Naz, Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Neutrosophc N-LA-Semgroup

4 Neutrosophc Sets Systems, Vol. 4, 04 tures, 9 p., Hexs, 006. [4] W. B. Vasantha Kasamy & Florentn Smarache, N-Algebrac Structures S-N- Algebrac Structures, 09 pp., Hexs, Phoenx, 006. [5] W. B. Vasantha Kasamy & Florentn Smarache, Basc Neutrosophc Algebrac Structures ther Applcatons to Fuzzy Neutrosophc Models, Hexs, 49 pp., 004. [6] P. Holgate: Groupods satsfyng a smple nvertve law, The Math. Student 6 (99). [7] M. Kazm M. Naseeruddn: On almost semgroups, Alg. Bull. Math. (97). [8] Q. Mushtaq M. S. Kamran: On left almost groups, Proc. Pak. Acad. Sc. 33 (996), 53-55. [9] M. Shabr, S. Naz, Pure spectrum of an aggroupod wth left dentty zero, World Appled Scences Journal 7 (0) 759-768. [0] Protc, P.V N. Stevanovc, AG-test some general propertes of Abel-grassmann s groupods,pu. M. A, 4,6 (995), 37 383. [] Madad Khan N. Ahmad, Characterzatons of left almost semgroups by ther deals, Journal of Advanced Research n Pure mathematcs, (00), 6 73. [] Q. Mushtaq M. Khan, Ideals n left almost semgroups, Proceedngs of 4 th Internatonal Pure mathematcs Conference, 003, 65 77. Receved: June 8, 04. Accepted: June 30, 04. Mumtaz Al, Florentn Smarache, Muhammad Shabr Munazza Naz, Neutrosophc B-LA-Semgroup Neutrosophc N-LA-Semgroup