Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and common Pulsatilla species

Similar documents
1 Towards Ecological Relevance Progress and Pitfalls in the Path Towards an Understanding of Mycorrhizal Functions in Nature... 3 D.J.

Mycorrhizal dependence and growth habit of warm-season and cool-season tallgrass prairie plants

When do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi protect plant roots from pathogens?

Plant coexistence mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Plant root symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: patterns of diversity from global to local scales

The diversity of plant communities mediates mycorrhizal fungal diversity

Restriction Analyses of PCR Amplified Partial SSU Ribosomal DNA to Distinguish Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi from Other Fungi Colonizing Plant Roots

Effect of host plant, cultivation media and inoculants sources on propagation of mycorrhizal fungus Glomus Mossae

As negative mycorrhizal growth responses (MGR) have received more experimental attention

LETTER Genetic variability in a population of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi causes variation in plant growth

AGR1006. Assessment of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculants for Pulse Crop Production Systems

COMPONENTS OF VA MYCORRHIZAL INOCULUM AND THEIR EFFECTS ON GROWTH OF ONION

Supporting Information Table S1 and Methods S1

EFFECTS OF DROUGHT STRESS ON GROWTH RESPONSE IN CORN, SUDAN GRASS, AND BIG BLUESTEM TO GLOMUS ETUNICA TUM*

EFFECTS OF NUTRIENT LEVELS ON THE COLONIZATION OF POA SECUNDA BY ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AND DARK SEPTATE ENDOPHYTES

Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in spruce forest ecosystem and their effect on performance of forest understorey plant species

Performance of two Centaurea species in response to different root-associated microbial communities and to alterations in nutrient availability

Using Soil Microbes to Enhance Restoration of Native FL Scrub. Ben Sikes University of Texas at Austin

EFFECT OF INOCULATION WITH VAM-FUNGI AND BRADYRHIZOBIUM ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN IN SINDH

Impact of cropping system on mycorrhiza

Influence of Soils and Fertility on Activity and Survival of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal. Fungi

Working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture

Plant communities affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal. diversity and community composition in grassland microcosms

Growth responses of Acacia angustissima to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal. inoculation. Abstract

Comparison of two main mycorrhizal types

QUANTIFYING VESICULAR-ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAE: A PROPOSED METHOD TOWARDS STANDARDIZATION*

White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:

Community-level consequences of mycorrhizae depend on phosphorus availability

STUDY ON THE USE OF ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA FUNGI FOR IMPROVING CROP PRODUCTIVITY IN AGROFORESTRY SYSTEM IN GUNUNG WALAT EDUCATIONAL FOREST

Bi-directional transfer of phosphorus between red clover and perennial ryegrass via arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphal links

MYCORRHIZAE IMPACT ON BIODIVERSITY AND C-BALANCE OF GRASSLAND ECOSYSTEMS UNDER CHANGING CLIMATE MYCARBIO

Nature and Science, 2009;7(6), ISSN ,

Wantira Ranabuht Department of Botany, Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University

Continue 59 Invasive. Yes. Place on invasive plant list, no further investigation needed. STOP. No. Continue on to question 2.

Do soil communities differ between native and invasive dune grasses on Great Lakes sand dunes?

How Mycorrhizae Can Improve Plant Quality

for GREENHOUSES GREENHOUSE Why are Mycorrhizae Important? Benefit to Plants

MYCORRHIZAL COLONIZATION AS IMPACTED BY CORN HYBRID

N, P and O 3 -responses of subalpine plants and their

ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION

Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal associations of sesamum

Home-field advantage? evidence of local adaptation among plants, soil, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi through meta-analysis

The role of mycorrhizas in plant community structure and dynamics: lessons from grasslands

Microbial Activity in the Rhizosphere

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on plant competition and community structure

Analogous effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the

Quantum Dots: A New Technique to Assess Mycorrhizal Contributions to Plant Nitrogen Across a Fire-Altered Landscape

Interactions Between Microorganisms and Higher Plants from Competition to Symbiosis p. 184

Evolutionary Ecology. Evolutionary Ecology. Perspective on evolution. Individuals and their environment 8/31/15

Why Should You Consider Using Mycorrhizae? Northeast Greenhouse Conference 2018 Mycorrhizal Applications LLC 1

AP Environmental Science I. Unit 1-2: Biodiversity & Evolution

Peter Gault Kennedy CURRICULUM VITAE. 321 Koshland Hall phone: University of California, Berkeley fax: Berkeley, CA 94720

Mycorrhizas And Tropical Soil Fertility [An Article From: Agriculture, Ecosystems And Environment] [HTML] [Digital] By I.M. Cardoso;T.W.

Effect Of Inoculation Of Vam Fungi On Enhancement Of Biomass And Yield In Okra. Maruti S. Darade

Influence of Ectomycorrhiza on Nutrient Absorption of Pinus massoniana Seedlings Under Water Stress

Phenanthrene and pyrene uptake by arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi ( ) Buy online at

International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN: Research Article

spatial dispersion, interspecific competition and mycorrhizal colonization

Georgia Performance Standards for Urban Watch Restoration Field Trips

Soil ecology. KEN KILLHAM Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Aberdeen CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. with electron micrographs by

Home-Field Advantage? Evidence of Local Adaptation Among Plants, Soil, and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi through Meta-Analysis.

Digital ESF. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Max Hermanson. Silus Weckel. Alex Kozisky.

Symbiotic Fungal Endophytes that Confer Tolerance for Plant Growth in Saline and Dry Soils Zakia Boubakir, Elizabeth Cronin, Susan Kaminskyj

Lecture 24 Plant Ecology

Impact of Ozone on Plant Competition and Structural Diversity of Rhizosphere Microbial Communities in Grassland Mesocosms

Screening of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for symbiotic efficiency with sweet potato

Development of the VAM fungus, Glomus mosseae in groundnut in static solution culture

Elucidating the Mystery of the Tripartite Symbiosis Plant Mycorrhizal fungi Dark Septate Endophytes

Chapter 8. Biogeographic Processes. Upon completion of this chapter the student will be able to:

CHAPTER 3. Partner selection in the mycorrhizal mutualism. Gijsbert D.A. Werner and E. Toby Kiers

Co-invasion of invasive trees and their associated belowground mutualists

Root-Knot Nematode on Tomato Plants: Effects of Nemacur, Phosphorus and. Infection Time

EFFECT OF GLOMUS MOSSEAE ON GROWTH AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF CAJANUS CAJAN (VAR. ICPL-87)

Title: Mycorrhizal fungi associated with high soil N:P ratios are more likely to be lost upon conversion from grasslands to arable agriculture

Gnzman-Plazola. R.A.. R. Ferrera-Cerrato and JJX Etchevers. Centro de Edafologia, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico.

Chapter 7. General discussion

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function

Community Interactions. Community An assemblage of all the populations interacting in an area

The specificity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in perennial ryegrass white clover pasture

Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plaat Sci.), Vol. 95, No. 1, August 1985, pp Printed in India. K PARVATHI, K VENKATESWARLU and A S RAO

Absorption of Mineral Salts by Higher Plant

EFFECT OF ENDOGONE MYCORRHIZA ON PLANT GROWTH

Influence of Endomycorrhizae on Growth of Sweetgum Seedlings From Eight Mother Trees

Biodiversity and sustainability of grasslands

The Use of Mycorrhizae in Mined Land Reclamation

What determines: 1) Species distributions? 2) Species diversity? Patterns and processes

Earth s Major Terrerstrial Biomes. *Wetlands (found all over Earth)

Final Exam Plant Ecology 10 December Name:


Lesson Overview. Niches and Community Interactions. Lesson Overview. 4.2 Niches and Community Interactions

Feedback between nutrient availability, NPP and N release

Effect of the rhizosphere bacterium Pseudomonas putida, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and substrate composition

Microbiota: Its Evolution and Essence. Hsin-Jung Joyce Wu "Microbiota and man: the story about us

INTERACTION BETWEEN A VESICULAR-ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA AND RHIZOBIUM AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SOYBEAN IN THE FIELD

Factors Affecting the Infection of Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Transformed Root Culture

Influence of Mycorrhizal Source and Seeding Methods on Native Grass Species Grown in Soils from a Disturbed Site

Lack of mutualisms as barrier for Pinaceae invasion* Biological invasions are a problem

Underground resource allocation between individual

The dynamics of root colonisation by communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in jarrah forest soil

Ectomycorrhizal fungi above and below ground in a small, isolated aspen stand: A simple system reveals fungal fruiting strategies an an edge effect

Transcription:

Functional Ecology 2004 Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and common Pulsatilla species M. MOORA,* M. ÖPIK,* R. SEN and M. ZOBEL* *Institute of Botany and Ecology, Tartu University, 40 Lai Street, 51005 Tartu, Estonia, and Department of Biosciences, Division of General Microbiology, Viikki Biocentre, PO Box 56, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland Summary 1. An experiment was carried out to determine whether the community composition of root-colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) influences the growth and nutrient status of two congeneric Pulsatilla species, one rare and one common in Estonia. We hypothesized that: (i) establishment and growth of plants is influenced by the composition of native AMF communities; (ii) growth of congeneric plant species with different abundances differs due to their response to specific AMF communities; and (iii) distribution of a plant species may depend on the composition of local root symbiotic AMF communities. 2. Rare Pulsatilla patens and common Pulsatilla pratensis were grown in pots, under homogeneous soil nutrient and microbial community conditions, containing either one from two (grassland and forest sites) of natural AMF soil inocula, or no AMF. 3. Lower establishment was observed in the non-mycorrhizal soil compared to AMF inoculated soils. Plant biomass, phosphorus concentration and root AMF colonization of both species were higher, and nitrogen concentration lower, in grassland as opposed to forest inoculum. 4. The common species displayed more vigorous growth than the rare counterpart in the presence of grassland inoculum. Conversely, slightly better growth of a rare species was recorded in the forest inoculum, in which plant biomass was an order of magnitude lower compared to the grassland inoculum. 5. As Pulsatilla spp. roots hosted site-characteristic AMF small-subunit rdna sequence groupings, we suggest that the presence of AM fungi that are more beneficial for the common species may be one factor behind the observed differential distribution and performance of the two plant species. Key-words: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, boreal forest, gaps, mycorrhizal response, seedling establishment Functional Ecology (2004) Ecological Society Introduction Interactions between plants and microbes have a significant impact on plant performance (Bever 2003). The important role(s) played by root symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in influencing plant population dynamics through their control of soil nutrient uptake, root pathogens and intra- and interplant species linkages are now being appreciated (Zobel, Moora & Haukioja 1997; Smith, Hartnett & Wilson 1999; Callaway et al. 2003; Castelli & Casper 2003). Studies using traditional spore identification and recent molecular identification methodologies show that AMF communities in soil as spores (Merryweather & Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mari.moora@ut.ee Fitter 1998; Eom, Hartnett & Wilson 2000) and in roots (Helgason et al. 1998, 2002; Daniell et al. 2001; Husband et al. 2002; Vandenkoornhuyse et al. 2002; Öpik et al. 2003) are patchily distributed both among and within sites. Moreover, plants can vary widely in their response to individual AMF taxa (Klironomos 2003). Consequently, the occurrence and abundance of a vascular plant species in a particular community may be dependent on the presence of a specific AMF species or combinations of species (van der Heijden et al. 1998). Thus explanations of how natural variation of AMF communities influences the performance of plant species is of primary interest when explaining the patterns of natural plant biodiversity. There are a number of studies where plant growth response to natural soil inoculum has been compared to that on sterile soil. However, we lack experimental 554

555 Seedling performance and AMF communities evidence highlighting differential plant species-related growth patterns in natural soils that are likely to support dissimilar AMF communities, as the bulk of experimental studies have involved inoculations with a limited number of easily cultured AM fungi which are often poorly represented in the natural root-colonizing AMF communities (Read 2002). The only exceptions known to us are pot experiments showing differential plant growth in the presence of natural soil or root inocula of different origin (Johnson 1993; Kiers et al. 2000; Corkidi et al. 2002; Frank et al. 2003). However, the relative contribution of native AMF communities to the observed plant growth responses cannot be assessed in these studies because the AM fungi colonizing plant roots were not identified. In order to overcome the questionable ecological relevance of experiments using a few easily cultured AMF (Read 2002), experiments coupling naturally co-occurring plant species and AMF communities are needed. At the same time, to understand the effects of native AMF communities, it is still not enough to use soil inocula either completely blind or containing known spore communities, as long as we lack information on the actual composition of AMF communities that colonize and symbiotically interact with plant roots after exposure to soil inocula. To our knowledge, the experiment reported here is one of the first to couple these two aspects: a contrasted natural soil inoculation experiment to determine species-specific plant performance that also includes high-resolution identification of root-colonizing AMF communities of the plants investigated. Our goal was to determine whether seedling establishment and growth of native plant species differs on natural soil inoculum originating from different sites. If a differential response was identified, a valid assumption worth investigation is that distribution of a plant species may depend, in addition to other factors, on the composition of local root symbiotic AMF communities. As a relevant model, we chose a pair of plant species with similar morphology, ecology and phylogeny: Pulsatilla patens and Pulsatilla pratensis [both (L.) Mill. Ranunculaceae]. The former is now rare with a limited distribution, while the latter is common in Estonia (Pilt & Kukk 2002). One of the major reasons for differences in local and regional abundance of plants might be related to their differential responses to the presence of (particular) soil microbes (Klironomos 2002, 2003). Seedlings of both Pulsatilla species investigated here are seldom encountered in established vegetation, as establishment takes place almost exclusively in disturbed gaps or areas of moderate disturbance (Uotila 1996; Pilt & Kukk 2002). Therefore it is probable that AMF spores are the main infection source for Pulsatilla spp. seedlings, while root colonization via functioning hyphal networks is less significant due to the lack of established vegetation in disturbed sites. Such an infection by spores may be relatively more beneficial for seedlings than inoculation via intact mycelial network, as in the latter case competitive interactions may overwhelm benefits (Kytöviita, Vestberg & Tuomi 2003). We aimed to investigate whether different soil AM fungal communities contribute to differential establishment and growth of two Pulsatilla species in conditions simulating gapped environments. In a seedling-establishment experiment of factorial design, we used soil inoculum from two sites with distinct vegetation characteristics: a boreal forest stand, and dry grassland. Both rare and common species coexist at the forest site, but only the common P. pratensis is found in the grassland site. Unlike many earlier studies, we possess background data on AMF present in roots of the experimental Pulsatilla plants from the phylogenetic analysis of amplified and cloned smallsubunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU rdna) sequences (Öpik et al. 2003). Materials and methods Soil inoculum was collected from two divergent sites in Estonia: grassland and forest. The first is a 0 5 ha remnant patch of dry perennial grassland at Pangodi in central Estonia (58 10 N, 26 34 E), used as pasture until agricultural activity ceased 15 years ago. There are some single, mature Scots Pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the area. The plant community consists of 35 species of perennial grasses and forbs, 33 of which are potentially arbuscular mycorrhizal. Helictotrichon pratense (L.) Besser, Galium verum L. and Festuca rubra L. represent the predominant species. The second site is a sparse, mature, boreal Scots Pine-dominated forest at Soomaa National Park, south-western Estonia (58 24 N, 25 19 E). The ectomycorrhizal Scots Pine covers 40 50% of the area; in the understorey ericoid mycorrhizal Calluna vulgaris L. predominates in the shrub layer and Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) B., S. and G. and Pleurozium schreberi (Brid.) Mitt. in the moss layer. There are five AM herbaceous plant species in the community, with a cover of less than 5%. Among these, Festuca ovina L. is the most abundant. The distance between the sites is 90 km. Soils in both sites are dry arenosols with weakly differentiated horizons and rather similar properties (Table 1). Topsoil samples (3 10 cm) were collected from 10 randomly chosen sites in both target ecosystems in the second half of August 1999 and stored in the dark at 10 C. Samples from each location were sieved to remove roots and then pooled for the experiment. Soil ph, P, N and C contents were determined according to Moore & Chapman (1986). Pulsatilla patens and P. pratensis are perennial forbs that grow in dry grasslands and boreal forests. Pulsatilla patens is now restricted to 27 isolated populations in Estonia (Pilt & Kukk 2002). In contrast, P. pratensis is relatively abundant. Mature seeds of both species were collected in summer 1999 from three local populations. Seeds were pooled, visually examined and

Table 556 1. Characteristics of natural soils (data from Pilt & Kukk 2002 for 30 cm topsoil layer), M. Moora and of et soil al. mixtures used in the current experiment: forest inoculum forest soil mixed with sterilized grassland soil; grassland inoculum grassland soil mixed with sterilized forest soil; sterile soil both soils sterilized and mixed Soil ph (H 2 O) Total N (%) Mobile P (mg per 100 g soil) Total C (%) Natural soils Pangodi grassland 7 7 0 059 10 1 ND Soomaa forest 8 6 0 109 9 8 ND 1 : 1 Soil mixture used in the current experiment (n = 5, mean ± SE) Forest inoculum 6 9 (± 0 01) 0 08 (± 0 001) 9 0 (± 0 07) 2 3 (± 0 12) Grassland inoculum 6 8 (± 0 01) 0 07 (± 0 001) 8 9 (± 0 08) 2 21 (± 0 08) Sterile soil 6 8 (± 0 01) 0 07 (± 0 000) 9 1 (± 0 04) 2 17 (± 0 07) ND, not determined. selected to avoid those damaged by herbivores or pathogenic fungi. Plant seeds were sown on 8 February 2000 onto a 1 : 1 mixture of the two natural soils, with one of the soils being autoclaved (40 min at 121 C). We did not detect any significant differences in soil characteristics between soil mixtures where either the soil from grassland, soil from forest, or both soils were autoclaved (Table 1). A mixture of both autoclaved soils served as a non-mycorrhizal control treatment. Hereafter, the soil inoculum treatments are referred to as grassland inoculum (mixed with sterilized forest soil); forest inoculum (mixed with sterilized grassland soil); and sterile soil (both soils sterilized). All pots received 2 ml filtered washing of respective mixed soil inoculum to correct for possible differences in soil bacterial and fungal communities (Koide & Li 1989). The experiment was conducted in the greenhouse of the Viikki Biocentre at Helsinki University. Seeds were sown at a uniform density (1 2 seeds cm 2 ) into pots (9 12 cm, depth diameter). Pots were carefully watered with tap water as required. Each treatment was replicated 10 times. Plants were grown in full daylight (daylength 16 h) for 14 weeks. At both harvests the plants were still in at the juvenile stage, and there were no major differences in plant phenology between the two harvests. Plant establishment rate was recorded daily until no new germlings were detected, then plants were thinned to three individuals per pot (at maximum equidistant positions to avoid competition). Two seedlings from each pot were harvested carefully 5 weeks later (10 for biomass analysis; five for root staining; five for molecular analysis) and the third was allowed to grow on further for 9 weeks. The 14-week-old plants were harvested to prevent plants from becoming root-bound in pots. Shoots and roots were separated, dried at 85 C for 24 h, and weighed. A correction in root biomass values at second harvest was made using differences between fresh and dry weight of root sample (for AMF determination) per treatment. Phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations in 14-week-old plants were determined following Kjeldahl digestions of dried plant tissues. Due to the limited plant material available, the P concentration of plants in sterile soil treatment could not be determined. The percentage AMF colonization (root length colonized, %) was estimated on the basis of the full root system of five seedlings (first harvest), or 1 2 g (FW) randomly selected root segments (second harvest). Root samples were stained (Koske & Gemma 1989) and the percentage of colonization was determined (Rajapakse & Miller 1992). The AMF community composition in the roots of four to five seedlings from each treatment was determined from randomly selected root samples (total length 5 cm), or the entire root system if under this length, as described for a related study by Öpik et al. (2003). Briefly, a 550 bp fragment located in the middle section of the SSU gene was amplified with the AMF-specific primer pair NS31/AM1 (Simon, Lalonde & Bruns 1992; Helgason et al. 1998). The PCR products were separated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and individual bands excised, cloned and sequenced. The fungal sequence groups identified in the seedlings roots of this study comprise part of a larger AMF community survey of native plants and trap seedlings of P. patens and P. pratensis in various Estonian locations (Öpik et al. 2003). For analysis of the plant establishment rate, a repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted, with plant species and soil inoculum as fixed factors and time as the repeated-measures factor. Biomass, root AMF colonization rate, and plant P and N concentrations (presented as percentage of plant dry biomass) data were subjected to ANOVA. Biomass and percentage AMF colonization data were, respectively, log- and arcsinetransformed prior to statistical analysis. All analyses were conducted with the Windows version of STATISTICA (StatSoft, Inc., 2000, Tulsa, OK, USA). Similarities of AM fungal communities, calculated on the basis of the fungal sequence groups presence/absence in a root system, were analysed by multivariate cluster analysis (Ward s linkage method and Euclidean distance measure) implemented in PC-ORD ver. 4 01 (McCune & Mefford 1999). Results PLANT ESTABLISHMENT Seed germination commenced 17 days after sowing and continued for 12 days. The establishment rate of P. patens was higher than that of P. pratensis (F = 10 58, P = 0 002), with the final rates on AMF inoculum-containing soils being 51 and 30%, respectively. Soil inoculum had a significant effect on establishment (F = 14 19, P < 0 001) establishment on sterile soil (28% P. patens, 21% P. pratensis) was significantly lower than that on AMF inoculum-containing soil. The significant interaction between plant species and time (F = 18 03, P < 0 001) stressed the early

557 Seedling performance and AMF communities Table 2. ANOVAs for plant total biomass characters, percentage arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization of roots, and N and P tissue concentrations of P. patens and P. pratensis (species, sp.) grown on three soil inocula at two harvest times (time) Shoot biomass Root biomass Total biomass Shoot : root ratio Mycorrhizal colonization Source of variation d.f. F P F P F P F P d.f. F P Species 1 4 6 0 034 0 09 0 770 0 74 0 392 2 45 0 121 1 0 63 0 435 Inoculum 2 646 1 0 000 290 86 0 000 559 87 0 000 1 97 0 144 1 48 29 0 000 Time 1 802 8 0 000 355 57 0 000 712 11 0 000 82 80 0 000 1 57 77 0 000 Species inoculum 2 10 3 0 000 0 63 0 535 3 24 0 043 1 22 0 301 1 1 17 0 289 Species time 1 4 4 0 038 0 08 0 776 0 68 0 410 0 96 0 329 1 0 27 0 610 Inoculum time 2 635 0 0 000 287 48 0 000 550 50 0 000 11 35 0 000 1 0 31 0 581 Sp. inoc. time 2 10 2 0 000 1 33 0 269 4 40 0 015 1 19 0 308 1 2 21 0 148 Phosphorus concentration* Nitrogen concentration Source of variation d.f. Shoot Root Total Shoot Root Total F P F P F P d.f. F P F P F P Species 1 1 22 0 277 0 24 0 625 0 20 0 654 1 0 37 0 543 2 17 0 147 2 17 0 147 Inoculum 1 0 23 0 633 37 71 0 000 10 58 0 003 2 5 2 0 009 14 77 0 000 13 5 0 000 Species inoculum 1 3 82 0 059 1 35 0 254 3 62 0 066 2 1 23 0 303 0 85 0 432 1 3 0 275 *Not determined in plants grown on control soil due to small plant biomass. common establishment rates of the two species, later followed by a higher establishment of P. patens over P. pratensis. The interaction between soil inoculum and time was also significant (F = 7 99, P < 0 001). From the fifth day of germination, establishment on the sterile soil remained significantly lower than on the other two test soils. PLANT BIOMASS Total plant biomass did not differ between the two Pulsatilla species (Table 2). Grassland inoculum supported higher plant biomass production than the forest and sterile soils (Fig. 1a,b). Hierarchical patterns of interactions between factors were resolved (Table 2). The soil-inoculum treatment had no effect on biomass at the first harvest, but differences appeared at the second harvest (Fig. 1a,b). Compared with sterile soil, the rare P. patens grew to a higher biomass in the forest inoculum while the common P. pratensis did not, although no significant difference was detected in the final biomass of P. patens and P. pratensis plants. On grassland inoculum, plants grew larger than on the two other soils; the absolute biomass values differed by an order of magnitude. Overall, the P. pratensis seedlings produced the largest total biomass on grassland inoculum compared with the P. patens. Shoot biomass variation was the main cause of total biomass variation between the two plant species, shown by the same significant main effects and interactions in the analyses of shoot and total biomass (Table 2). Root biomass did not differ between the species, but the soil inoculum effect was significant (Table 2). The greatest root production was observed on grassland inoculum, followed by plants grown on forest and sterile soil. Unlike in the case of total plant biomass, there were no significant interactions between plant species and other factors. Shoot-to-root ratio decreased with time on grassland inoculum and sterile soil, but not on forest inoculum (Table 2). Rapid shoot growth was favoured during the first 5 weeks, with a later switch to more intensive development of roots. AM FUNGAL COLONIZATION OF ROOTS No host species-related differences were detected in percentage mycorrhizal colonization of roots (Table 2). Plant roots were not colonized by AMF on sterile soil. The colonization rate remained moderate on forest inoculum, while on grassland inoculum plant roots were highly colonized by AMF (Fig. 1c). AMF root colonization increased with time and was positively correlated with plant total biomass (r = 0 630, P = 0 007, Pearson s correlation). PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN CONCENTRATION OF PLANT TISSUES The P and N concentrations in plant tissues differed between plants grown in different soil inocula (Fig. 1d,e) but not between the two Pulsatilla species (Table 2). Higher root tissue P and total plant P concentrations were observed in plants on grassland inoculum than on forest inoculum. Whereas lower root and total plant N concentrations occurred in plants on grassland inoculum than on forest and sterile soil treatments, shoot N concentration was lower on grassland than on forest inoculum. Plant total biomass and

558 M. Moora et al. Fig. 1. Total dry weight of (a) 5-week-old and (b) 14-week-old plants; (c) arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization; and total tissue (d) phosphorus and (e) nitrogen concentrations (14-week-old plants) of Pulsatilla patens (shaded bars) and Pulsatilla pratensis (open bars) seedlings grown in the presence of forest or grassland soil inoculum, or on non-amf-containing (sterile) soil. Different lower case letters above bars indicate a significant difference (P 0 05) between AM fungal inoculations according to Tukey s HSD test. Note the different scales in (a) and (b). Values presented are means ± 1 SE. percentage of AMF root colonization were positively correlated with plant total P concentration (r = 0 384, P = 0 019; r = 0 669, P = 0 003, Pearson s correlation) and negatively correlated with plant total N concentration (r = 0 587, P < 0 001; r = 0 750, P = 0 050, Pearson s correlation). The same correlation pattern was observed when shoot and root biomasses were analysed separately. AM FUNGAL COMMUNITIES IN ROOTS Root-colonizing AM fungal sequence groups were determined following PCR amplification, DGGE, cloning and sequencing (Öpik et al. 2003). Cluster analysis of AM fungal communities in each root system, based on presence/absence data for the sequence groups identified, distinguished two main clusters predominantly based on the origin of soil inoculum (forest or grassland) and not on host-plant species that appeared intermixed on the dendrogram (Fig. 2). The prevalence of root-colonizing sequence groups G1, G2 and G5 characterized the forest soil communities, while G3, G13 and G14 were more abundant in grassland communities. Seven fungal sequence groups were specifically detected in the roots of plants grown on grassland inoculum, including the most common

559 Seedling performance and AMF communities Fig. 2. Hierarchical clustering analysis of AM fungal communities in Pulsatilla seedling roots by Ward s linkage method with Euclidean distance measure. Seedlings of Pulsatilla pratensis (triangles) and P. patens (circles) were grown in the presence of forest (filled symbols) and grassland (open symbols) soil inoculum; roots of 5-week-old (1) and 14-week-old plants (2) were analysed. AM fungi were identified as SSU rdna sequence groups by Öpik et al. (2003). Sequence group designations: A, Acaulospora; G, Glomus; Gi, Gigaspora; S, Scutellospora. No, sample number; H, harvest. Each sample represents the root system of one seedling where the fungal community is described by fungal sequence types present/absent. sequence group in the grassland AMF community, G3. Four rare sequence groups were detected only in roots of plants grown in the forest inoculum. Group G5 was the most frequent, but this group also occurred in grassland inoculum plants. In total 12 and eight AMF sequence groups were detected in grassland and forest inoculum plants, respectively. Discussion EFFECT OF SOIL INOCULUM SOURCE ON PLANT ESTABLISHMENT AND GROWTH Clear response patterns of the rare and common Pulsatilla species seedlings to soil inocula from two different sites were identified in this study. The presence of natural soil containing AM fungi significantly improved seedling establishment compared with the sterile soil control treatment. These data provide strong support for a beneficial role of soil microbiota (including AMF) during establishment. With no differences between the two natural soils, the establishment rate of the rare species P. patens was higher than that of a common species, P. pratensis. Establishment aside, the natural soils imparted an obvious differential impact on subsequent plant growth. The grassland inoculum supported seedling growth an order of magnitude greater than that of the forest inoculum. Earlier studies (van der Heijden et al. 1998; Bray, Kitajima & Sylvia 2003) identified plant species-specific growth responses to different combinations of cultured AM fungi, and hypothesized that there is also a differential effect of native AMF communities. Our results show for the first time, to our knowledge, the differential growth response of native plants in the presence of divergent root-colonizing natural AMF communities, identified by high-resolution SSU-based molecular analysis. We conclude that the performance of particular plant species in natural habitats may depend on the composition of local AMF communities. ROOT AMF COLONIZATION AND TISSUE P AND N CONTENT The positive growth response of plants to AMF inoculation can be related to either improved P nutrition or avoidance of root infection by root pathogens (Newsham, Fitter & Watkinson 1995). In our experiment, improved P nutrition was the most probable explanation behind the growth response, as the increased growth coincided with increased AMF root colonization and higher P content in plant tissues. The rate and extent to which AM fungi colonized plant roots appeared to be strongly dependent on the origin of inoculum. The high colonization levels of seedlings exposed to grassland inoculum at 5 weeks,

560 M. Moora et al. which in forest inoculum seedlings was reached only after 14 weeks, was capitalized in better growth compared with forest inoculum seedlings at 14 weeks. In natural plant communities, successful establishment of seedlings may be strongly influenced by the availability and colonization ability of AMF diaspores (Hart & Reader 2002; Hart, Reader & Klironomos 2003). The presence of sufficient numbers of fungal diaspores that are potentially able to rapidly colonize and promote a good sustained growth response could explain early seedling colonization and subsequent promotion of plant growth with the grassland inoculum. Differences in root AMF colonization levels could partially explain the differential plant growth on the two natural soil inocula, given that higher colonization levels and tissue P concentration accompanied higher plant biomass on grassland inoculum. Positive relationships between root AMF colonization rate and plant biomass response have been reported for plant species with higher responsiveness to AMF (van der Heijden et al. 1998; Wilson & Hartnett 1998). Mycorrhizal colonization levels have been positively associated with plant tissue P concentrations in manipulated and native field studies (Merryweather & Fitter 1995, 1996). In support of the recent findings of Miller et al. (2002) on mycorrhiza-mediated control of plant nutrient status, the inverse relationship between plant tissue N concentration with P concentration and biomass was highlighted in the present study. As lower N concentration in leaves may indicate higher N-use efficiency (Berendse & Aerts 1987), it is conceivable that one of the mechanisms behind the differential positive effect of grassland inoculum on plant performance may be the improved P nutrition and associated increase in N-use efficiency, possibly mediated by specific AMF in that soil. AM FUNGAL COMMUNITIES AM fungi that are easily cultivable via trap plants and frequently used in experiments are, however, rarely or (more often) not found in roots of native plants in field surveys (Clapp et al. 2002; Helgason et al. 2002). Thus ecologically relevant studies need to be carried out to test differential plant performance in response to AMF. It should be noted that in earlier experimental studies using soil or root inocula, no information has been given on the AMF species actually colonizing plant roots. Here, SSU sequence-based analyses identified 12 and eight AM fungal sequence groups in grassland and forest soil inoculum treatments. Four of these are related to known species: G3 to Glomus intraradices; G10 to Glomus caledonium; G11 to Glomus mosseae; and S2 to Scutellospora nodosa; several have been detected in other studies (Öpik et al. 2003). The somewhat smaller number of AM fungi might be related to lower host-plant density in the forest site which can influence mycorrhizal colonization (Genney, Hartley & Alexander 2001) and possibly fungal propagule and species density in soil. Community analysis of root-colonizing fungi separated root samples almost exclusively based on soil inoculum origin, showing that plants grown on the two natural soil inocula hosted fungal communities differing in composition and in dominant sequence groups. A number of unique AMF sequence groups were identified from the grassland soil. These fungi may potentially contribute to the observed positive effect on plant growth because of their specific, yet unknown, functional characteristics. The most abundant grasslandspecific group, G3, is related to G. intraradices, some isolates of which show rapid root-colonization ability (Hart & Reader 2002) which might be decisive for seedling establishment success. Fungal sequence groups characteristic to forest soil, G2 and G5, show high similarity to an undescribed Glomus sp. (isolate UY 1225) known to confer some benefit to a relatively broad range of plant hosts, and to a sequence group Glomus sp. Glo2 of unknown properties (Helgason et al. 2002), respectively. Another aspect revealed by the AMF community analysis was the tendency for a reduction in AMF sequence groups in 5-week-old vs 14-week-old seedlings. This difference may indicate the successional replacement of AMF species during plant ontogenesis (Husband et al. 2002). PERFORMANCE OF TWO PLANT SPECIES The two Pulsatilla species differed in their growth response in the two test inocula, as the common P. pratensis performed better on grassland inoculum than the rare counterpart P. patens, while P. patens did slightly better on forest inoculum. However, the differences among species were relatively small when compared with differences induced by the two natural soil inocula. In general, soil inoculum had a pronounced effect on plant performance, and the common P. pratensis gained relatively more from the grassland inoculum. Fragmentation of P. patens populations in Estonia has evidently resulted in strong dispersal limitation (Pilt & Kukk 2002). As both Pulsatilla species rarely regenerate in established vegetation, and mostly do so following soil disturbance (Uotila 1996; Pilt & Kukk 2002), then even if plant diaspores are available, mycorrhizal growth promotion of seedlings and juvenile plants in conditions where most of the AMF infection is evidently spore-borne may be an important factor determining the fate of plant individuals. The composition of a local AMF community is, without doubt, an important determinant of the establishment success of both Pulsatilla species. Differential performance of Pulsatilla species on different soil inocula a common species grew significantly better on grassland inoculum, and a rare species slightly better on a forest inoculum refers to the possibility that growth response

561 Seedling performance and AMF communities to particular AMF community may be one factor behind the observed differential distribution pattern. Returning to our initial working hypotheses, we conclude that establishment and growth of native Pulsatilla spp. is influenced by the composition of native AM fungal communities, and the growth of congeneric plant species differs due to their response to specific AMF communities. Further targeted ecophysiological experimentation is needed to determine the functional roles of the observed divergent AM root colonization (Öpik et al. 2003; this study) on seedling establishment and subsequent plant performance, individually and in mixed-species communities. Acknowledgements The Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation, Finland and the Estonian Science Foundation (grants 4579 and 4468) financed the study. M.Ö. received scholarships from CIMO, Finland. Official permission to investigate rare plants was obtained from Estonian Ministry of Environment (21-5/1998/T6/1456). We are grateful to J. Liira for statistical advice. References Berendse, F. & Aerts, R. (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? Functional Ecology 1, 293 296. Bever, J.D. (2003) Soil community feedbacks and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytologist 157, 465 473. Bray, S.R., Kitajima, K. & Sylvia, D.M. (2003) Mycorrhizae differentially alter growth, physiology, and competitive ability of an invasive shrub. Ecological Applications 13, 565 574. Callaway, R.M., Mahall, B.E., Wicks, C., Pankey, J. & Zabinski, C. (2003) Soil fungi and the effects of an invasive forb on grasses: neighbor identity matters. Ecology 84, 129 135. Castelli, J.P. & Casper, B.B. (2003) Intraspecific AM fungal variation contributes to plant fungal feedback in a serpentine grassland. Ecology 84, 323 336. Clapp, J.P., Helgason, T., Daniell, T.J. & Young, J.P.W. (2002) Genetic studies of the structure and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Mycorrhizal Ecology (eds M.G.A. van der Heijden & I.R. Sanders), pp. 201 224. Springer, Berlin. Corkidi, L., Rowland, D.L., Johnson, N.C. & Allen, E.B. (2002) Nitrogen fertilization alters the functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizas at two semiarid grasslands. Plant and Soil 240, 299 310. Daniell, T.J., Husband, R., Fitter, A.H. & Young, J.P.W. (2001) Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising arable crops. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 36, 203 209. Eom, A.H., Hartnett, D.C. & Wilson, G.W.T. (2000) Host plant species effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 122, 435 444. Frank, D.A., Gehring, C.A., Machut, L. & Phillips, M. (2003) Soil community composition and the regulation of grazed temperate grassland. Oecologia 137, 603 609. Genney, D.R., Hartley, S.H. & Alexander, I.J. (2001) Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization increases with host density in a heathland community. New Phytologist 152, 355 363. Hart, M.M. & Reader, R.J. (2002) Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 153, 335 344. Hart, M.M., Reader, R.J. & Klironomos, J.N. (2003) Plant coexistence mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 418 423. van der Heijden, M.G.A., Boller, T., Wiemken, A. & Sanders, I.R. (1998) Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species are potential determinants of plant community structure. Ecology 79, 2082 2091. Helgason, T., Daniell, T.J., Husband, R., Fitter, A.H. & Young, J.P.W. (1998) Ploughing up the wood-wide web? Nature 394, 431. Helgason, T., Merryweather, J.W., Denison, J., Wilson, P., Young, J.P.W. & Fitter, A.H. (2002) Selectivity and functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas of co-occurring fungi and plants from a temperate deciduous woodland. Journal of Ecology 90, 371 384. Husband, R., Herre, E.A., Turner, S.L., Gallery, R. & Young, J.P.W. (2002) Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and patterns of host association over time and space in a tropical forest. Molecular Ecology 11, 2669 2678. Johnson, N.C. (1993) Can fertilization of soil select less mutualistic mycorrhizae? Ecological Applications 3, 749 757. Kiers, E.T., Lovelock, C.E., Krueger, E.L. & Herre, E.A. (2000) Differential effects of tropical arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inocula on root colonization and tree seedling growth: implications for tropical forest diversity. Ecology Letters 3, 106 113. Klironomos, J.N. (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417, 67 70. Klironomos, J.N. (2003) Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84, 2292 2301. Koide, R.T. & Li, M. (1989) Appropriate controls for vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza research. New Phytologist 111, 35 44. Koske, R.E. & Gemma, J.N. (1989) A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycological Research 92, 486 505. Kytöviita, M.-M., Vestberg, M. & Tuomi, J. (2003) A test of mutual aid in common mycorrhizal networks: established vegetation negates benefit in seedlings. Ecology 84, 898 906. McCune, B. & Mefford, M.J. (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA. Merryweather, J. & Fitter, A. (1995) Phosphorus and carbon budgets: mycorrhizal contribution in Hyacinthoides nonscripta (L.) Chouard ex Rothm. under natural conditions. New Phytologist 129, 619 627. Merryweather, J. & Fitter, A. (1996) Phosphorus nutrition of an obligately mycorrhizal plant treated with the fungicide benomyl in the field. New Phytologist 132, 307 311. Merryweather, J. & Fitter, A. (1998) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of Hyacinthoides non-scripta. I. Diversity of fungal taxa. New Phytologist 138, 117 129. Miller, R.M., Miller, S.P., Jastrow, J.D. & Rivetta, C.B. (2002) Mycorrhizal mediated feedbacks influence net carbon gain and nutrient uptake in Andropogon gerardii. New Phytologist 155, 149 162. Moore, P.D. & Chapman, S.B. (1986) Methods in Plant Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. Newsham, K.K., Fitter, A.H. & Watkinson, A.R. (1995) Arbuscular mycorrhiza protect an annual grass from root pathogenic fungi in the field. Journal of Ecology 83, 991 1000. Öpik, M., Moora, M., Liira, J., Kõljalg, U., Zobel, M. & Sen, R. (2003) Divergent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities

562 M. Moora et al. colonize roots of Pulsatilla spp. in boreal Scots pine forest and grassland soils. New Phytologist 160, 581 593. Pilt, I. & Kukk, Ü. (2002) Pulsatilla patens and Pulsatilla pratensis (Ranunculaceae) in Estonia: distribution and ecology. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Biology, Ecology 51, 242 256. Rajapakse, S. & Miller, J.C.J. (1992) Methods for studying vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization and related root physical properties. Techniques for the Study of Mycorrhiza (ed. J.R. Norris), pp. 301 316. Academic Press, London. Read, D.J. (2002) Towards ecological relevance progress and pitfalls in the path towards an understanding of mycorrhizal functions in nature. Mycorrhizal Ecology (eds M.G.A. van der Heijden & I.R. Sanders), pp. 3 29. Springer, Berlin. Simon, L., Lalonde, M. & Bruns, T.D. (1992) Specific amplification of 18S fungal ribosomal genes from VA endomycorrhizal fungi colonising roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 291 295. Smith, M.D., Hartnett, D.C. & Wilson, G.W.T. (1999) Interacting influence of mycorrhizal symbiosis and competition on plant diversity in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 121, 574 582. Uotila, P. (1996) Decline of Anemone patens (Ranunculaceae) in Finland. Acta Universitatia Upsaliensia. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalinsea 31, 205 210. Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Husband, R., Daniell, T.J., Watson, I.J., Duck, J.M., Fitter, A.H. & Young, J.P.W. (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition associated with two plant species in a grassland ecosystem. Molecular Ecology 11, 1555 1564. Wilson, G.W.T. & Hartnett, D.C. (1998) Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. American Journal of Botany 85, 1732 1738. Zobel, M., Moora, M. & Haukioja, E. (1997) Plant coexistence in the interactive environment: arbuscular mycorrhiza should not be out of mind. Oikos 78, 202 208. Received 26 September 2003; revised 22 December 2003; accepted 4 March 2004