Atwood s machine with a massive string

Similar documents
Version 001 HW#6 - Circular & Rotational Motion arts (00223) 1

Dynamics: Newton s Laws of Motion

INTRODUCTION. The three general approaches to the solution of kinetics problems are:

Forces from Strings Under Tension A string under tension medites force: the mgnitude of the force from section of string is the tension T nd the direc

Your Thoughts. Mechanics Lecture 16, Slide 1

Correct answer: 0 m/s 2. Explanation: 8 N

Study Guide Final Exam. Part A: Kinetic Theory, First Law of Thermodynamics, Heat Engines

The momentum of a body of constant mass m moving with velocity u is, by definition, equal to the product of mass and velocity, that is

16 Newton s Laws #3: Components, Friction, Ramps, Pulleys, and Strings

The Wave Equation I. MA 436 Kurt Bryan

Chapter 2. Constraints, Lagrange s equations

Purpose of the experiment

13.4 Work done by Constant Forces

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

Section 4.8. D v(t j 1 ) t. (4.8.1) j=1

Classical Mechanics. From Molecular to Con/nuum Physics I WS 11/12 Emiliano Ippoli/ October, 2011

10 Vector Integral Calculus

PHYSICS 211 MIDTERM I 21 April 2004

Mathematics of Motion II Projectiles

4 The dynamical FRW universe

ME 141. Lecture 10: Kinetics of particles: Newton s 2 nd Law

Model Solutions to Assignment 4

Math 8 Winter 2015 Applications of Integration

1.2. Linear Variable Coefficient Equations. y + b "! = a y + b " Remark: The case b = 0 and a non-constant can be solved with the same idea as above.

- 5 - TEST 2. This test is on the final sections of this session's syllabus and. should be attempted by all students.

A wire. 100 kg. Fig. 1.1

f(x) dx, If one of these two conditions is not met, we call the integral improper. Our usual definition for the value for the definite integral

THE EXISTENCE-UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Physics Honors. Final Exam Review Free Response Problems

Improper Integrals, and Differential Equations

When a force f(t) is applied to a mass in a system, we recall that Newton s law says that. f(t) = ma = m d dt v,

E S dition event Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics h Due, next Wednesday, 07/19/2006! 1-30

The Atwood Machine OBJECTIVE INTRODUCTION APPARATUS THEORY

Fig. 1. Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Systems with Plant Variations

PHYS Summer Professor Caillault Homework Solutions. Chapter 2

Math 120 Answers for Homework 13

Improper Integrals. Type I Improper Integrals How do we evaluate an integral such as

1.1. Linear Constant Coefficient Equations. Remark: A differential equation is an equation

A REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H. Thomas Shores Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Spring 2007

HW Solutions # MIT - Prof. Kowalski. Friction, circular dynamics, and Work-Kinetic Energy.

HIGHER SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS 4 UNIT (ADDITIONAL) Time allowed Three hours (Plus 5 minutes reading time)

The Active Universe. 1 Active Motion

Physics 201 Lab 3: Measurement of Earth s local gravitational field I Data Acquisition and Preliminary Analysis Dr. Timothy C. Black Summer I, 2018

(4.1) D r v(t) ω(t, v(t))

Physics Graduate Prelim exam

Unit 1 Exponentials and Logarithms

APPLICATIONS OF THE DEFINITE INTEGRAL

Line Integrals. Partitioning the Curve. Estimating the Mass

Section 6.1 INTRO to LAPLACE TRANSFORMS

KINEMATICS OF RIGID BODIES

Chapter 0. What is the Lebesgue integral about?

= 40 N. Q = 60 O m s,k

Answers to the Conceptual Questions

UNIT 1 FUNCTIONS AND THEIR INVERSES Lesson 1.4: Logarithmic Functions as Inverses Instruction

1 The Riemann Integral

SOLUTIONS TO CONCEPTS CHAPTER

JURONG JUNIOR COLLEGE

ARITHMETIC OPERATIONS. The real numbers have the following properties: a b c ab ac

NUMERICAL INTEGRATION. The inverse process to differentiation in calculus is integration. Mathematically, integration is represented by.

In-Class Problems 2 and 3: Projectile Motion Solutions. In-Class Problem 2: Throwing a Stone Down a Hill

Math 124A October 04, 2011

Centre of Mass, Moments, Torque

Page 1. Motion in a Circle... Dynamics of Circular Motion. Motion in a Circle... Motion in a Circle... Discussion Problem 21: Motion in a Circle

DIRECT CURRENT CIRCUITS

Conducting Ellipsoid and Circular Disk

Dynamics of an Inertially Driven Robot

Plates on elastic foundation

Travelling Profile Solutions For Nonlinear Degenerate Parabolic Equation And Contour Enhancement In Image Processing

State space systems analysis (continued) Stability. A. Definitions A system is said to be Asymptotically Stable (AS) when it satisfies

2. VECTORS AND MATRICES IN 3 DIMENSIONS

Math Lecture 23

Equations of Motion. Figure 1.1.1: a differential element under the action of surface and body forces

A ROTATING DISC IN CONSTANT PURE SHEAR BY S. KUMAR AND C. V. JOGA RAO

ESCI 343 Atmospheric Dynamics II Lesson 14 Inertial/slantwise Instability

Note 12. Introduction to Digital Control Systems

Math 113 Fall Final Exam Review. 2. Applications of Integration Chapter 6 including sections and section 6.8

SUMMER KNOWHOW STUDY AND LEARNING CENTRE

FULL MECHANICS SOLUTION

Review of Calculus, cont d

MatFys. Week 2, Nov , 2005, revised Nov. 23

First, we will find the components of the force of gravity: Perpendicular Forces (using away from the ramp as positive) ma F

Week 10: Line Integrals

The Basic Functional 2 1

This final is a three hour open book, open notes exam. Do all four problems.

Consequently, the temperature must be the same at each point in the cross section at x. Let:

Entropy ISSN

Electric Potential. Concepts and Principles. An Alternative Approach. A Gravitational Analogy

99/105 Comparison of OrcaFlex with standard theoretical results

Physics 116C Solution of inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations using Green s functions

Solution to HW 4, Ma 1c Prac 2016

We partition C into n small arcs by forming a partition of [a, b] by picking s i as follows: a = s 0 < s 1 < < s n = b.

MORE FUNCTION GRAPHING; OPTIMIZATION. (Last edited October 28, 2013 at 11:09pm.)

+ x 2 dω 2 = c 2 dt 2 +a(t) [ 2 dr 2 + S 1 κx 2 /R0

pivot F 2 F 3 F 1 AP Physics 1 Practice Exam #3 (2/11/16)

Some Methods in the Calculus of Variations

(6.5) Length and area in polar coordinates

PDE Notes. Paul Carnig. January ODE s vs PDE s 1

Math 113 Exam 1-Review

Department of Mechanical Engineering MECE 551 Final examination Winter 2008 April 16, 9:00 11:30. Question Value Mark

2/2/ :36 AM. Chapter 11. Kinematics of Particles. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba,Ph.D., P.E.

Transcription:

Atwood s mchine with mssive string rxiv:1710.01263v1 [physics.gen-ph] 1 Oct 2017 Nivldo A. Lemos Instituto de Físic - Universidde Federl Fluminense Av. Litorâne, S/N, Bo Vigem, Niterói, 24210-340, Rio de Jneiro - Brzil nivldo@if.uff.br October 4, 2017 Abstrct The dynmics of Atwood s mchine with string of significnt mss re described by the Lgrngin formlism, providing n eloquent exmple of how the Lgrngin pproch is gret del simpler nd so much more expedient thn the Newtonin tretment. Either with mssless or mssive pulley, Atwood s mchine [1] is stndrd exmple for the ppliction of the lws of Newtonin mechnics. In its most idelized mnifesttion, the pulley nd the string re supposed to be mssless nd the pulley is ssumed to be mounted on frictionless xle. The mss of the pulley is esily tken into ccount by the dynmics of the pulley s rottionl motion bout its fixed xis [2]. In these two cses treted in the textbooks the string is tken to be mssless. Both the idelized nd the relistic cse, in which ccount is tken of the msses of the string nd the pulley s well s of the friction in the pulley s berings, illustrte the principles involved in the ppliction of Newton s lws [3, 4]. Atwood s mchine is multipurpose mechnicl system, which llows one to investigte from Stokes s lw [5] to vrible-mss rocket motion [6]. Here we wish to determine the effect of the mss of the string on the motion of Atwood s mchine by mens of the Lgrngin formlism. Consider the Atwood s mchine depicted in Fig. 1, in which the string hs uniform liner mss density λ. The mss m s of the string is not supposed to be negligible in comprison with m 1 nd m 2. We ssume tht the string is inextensible nd does not slide on the pulley, which requires enough sttic friction between the string nd the pulley. On the other hnd, we ssume tht the pulley is mounted on frictionless xle. The tretment of this problem by Newtonin mechnics is cumbersome, since it requires the considertion of free-body digrms for the mssesm 1 ndm 2, the pulley together with the segment of the string in contct with it, nd the hnging prts of the string t ech side of the pulley. In order to find the ccelertion of m 1, for instnce, Newton s second lw for ech seprte body must be written down nd the four tensions t the ends of the hnging pieces of the string hve to be eliminted by lgebric mnipultion of the equtions [7]. We tckle the problem by mens of Lgrngin dynmics insted. We hve the constrint x+y = l (1) where l is the length of the hnging prt of the string, tht is, the totl length of the string minus the length of its segment tht touches the pulley. Since the string is inextensible nd does not 1

M R x y m 2 m 1 Figure 1: Two msses ttched to mssive string tht goes round pulley. slide on the pulley, the msses m 1, m 2 nd ll points of the string move t the sme speed v = ẋ, while the ngulr speed of the pulley is ω = v/r. Thus, the kinetic energy of the system is T = m 1 2 v2 + m 2 2 v2 + m s 2 v2 + I 2 ω2 = 1 2 (m 1 +m 2 +m s +I/R 2 )ẋ 2, (2) where m s is the mss of the string nd I is the pulley s moment of inerti with respect to the rottion xis. For instnce, if the pulley is homogeneous disk then I = MR 2 /2 Tking the horizontl plne tht contins the pulley s xle s the plne of zero grvittionl potentil energy, the potentil energy of the system is the sum of the grvittionl potentil energies of m 1, m 2, nd of the hnging pieces of the string t ech side of the pulley. Thus V = m 1 gx m 2 gy λxg x 2 λygy 2, (3) where we hve used the fct tht the grvittionl potentil energy of n extended body is determined by the position of its centre of mss. An immteril constnt hs been dropped, nmely the grvittionl potentil energy of the non-hnging prt of the string. With the use of the constrint (1) the potentil energy becomes V = (m 1 m 2 )gx λg 2 x2 λg 2 (l x)2, (4) where the irrelevnt dditive constnt m 2 gl hs been discrded. Thus, the Lgrngin is L = T V = 1 2 (m 1 +m 2 +m s +I/R 2 )ẋ 2 +(m 1 m 2 )gx+ λg 2 x2 + λg 2 (l x)2. (5) Lgrnge s eqution ( ) d L L dt ẋ x = 0 (6) 2

yields t once (m 1 +m 2 +m s +I/R 2 )ẍ = (m 1 m 2 )g +2λgx λgl. (7) This eqution predicts tht ẍ > 0 if m 1 +λx > m 2 +λ(l x), tht is, if the totl mss on the left of the pulley is lrger thn the totl mss on the right, which is the correct physicl condition for the mss m 1 to ccelerte downwrd. Furthermore, in the limit of mssless string (λ = 0) we recover the constnt ccelertion ẍ = m 1 m 2 m 1 +m 2 +I/R 2 g (8) tht is found in the textbooks. One cn hrdly fil to pprecite tht the Lgrngin pproch to this problem is substntilly simpler nd much more expedient thn the trditionl Newtonin tretment [7]. When the string is mssive the ccelertion is not constnt. The eqution of motion (7) tkes the form ẍ b 2 x =, (9) where = [ ] 1/2 (m 1 m 2 λl)g m 1 +m 2 +m s +I/R, b = 2λg. (10) 2 m 1 +m 2 +m s +I/R 2 The generl solution to the inhomogeneous liner differentil eqution (9) is the sum of prticulr solution with the generl solution to the homogeneous eqution, nmely where A nd B re rbitrry constnts, with x(t) = +Acoshbt+Bsinhbt (11) b2 The nturl initil conditions x(0) = x 0, ẋ(0) = 0 led to b = m 1 m 2 λl. (12) 2 2λ A = x 0 +, B = 0, (13) b2 whence x(t) = b 2 + ( x 0 + b 2 )coshbt. (14) A prticulrly simple cse ism 1 = m 2 = 0. Then the string moves owing only to the unblnced weights of its hnging prts t ech side of the pulley. In this cse [ ] 1/2 b = l 2 2, b = 2λg, (15) m s +I/R 2 nd it follows tht x(t) = l ( 2 + x 0 l ) cosh bt. (16) 2 3

As physiclly expected, if x 0 = l/2 then x(t) l/2, tht is, the string remins t rest in unstble equilibrium. The time scle of the motion is set by the time constnt τ = 1/b. For t bigger thn few time constnts the common speed of the msses nd the string grows exponentilly. This exponentil behvior is due to the fct tht s the string flls to one side more mss is trnsferred to tht side, incresing its weight unblnce with respect to the other side. Suppose m 1 = 0.20 kg, m 2 = 0.10 kg nd consider rope with λ = 0.02 kg/m nd l = 4.0 m. For typicl lbortory pulley we hve I = 1.8 10 6 kg m 2 nd R = 2.5 cm, from which it follows tht m s = λ(l+πr) = 0.084 kg. From equtions (12) nd (10) we find Therefore, if x 0 = 2.0 m eqution (14) yields b 2 = 0.50 m, b = 1.0 s 1. (17) x(t) = 0.50+2.5 cosht, (18) with x in metres nd t in seconds. If the string s mss were neglected, the mss m 1 would fll with the constnt ccelertion ã = 3.2 m/s 2 given by eqution (8). With the sme initil conditions, the instntneous position of m 1 would be given by x(t) = 2.0+1.6t 2. (19) Figure 2 shows comprison grph of x(t) (upper line) nd x(t) (lower line) from t = 0 to t = 1.2 s, when x reches its lrgest physiclly llowed vlue, nmely x = 4.0 m. In the present cse the effect of the string s mss is tht of slowing down the motion. If the string s mss is disregrded then x = 4.0 m is reched t t = 1.1 s insted of the correct t = 1.2 s, n 8% error tht certinly requires creful experimentl set up to be detected. If x 0 is smller the discrepncy is lrger nd more esily detected: for x 0 = 0.50 m one hs t = 2.2 s wheres t = 1.5 s. Figure 2: Position, in metres, of m 1 s function of time, in seconds, for mssless string (upper line) nd for mssive string (lower line) for the vlues of the prmeters nd initil conditions given in the text. 4

References [1] For historicl ccount of this iconic system, see Greenslde Jr., T B 1985 Atwood s mchine Phys. Tech. 23 24-28. [2] See, for exmple, Serwy, R A nd Jewett, Jr., J W 2006 Principles of Physics 4th ed. (Belomon, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole) pp. 310-311. [3] Kofsky, I L 1951 Atwood s mchine nd the teching of Newton s second lw Am. J. Phys. 19, 354-356. [4] Mrtell, E C nd Mrtell, V B 2013 The effect of friction in pulleys on the tension in cbles nd strings Phys. Tech. 51, 98-100. [5] Greenwood, M S, Fzio, F, Russotto, M nd Wilkosz, A 1986 Using the Atwood mchine to study Stokes lw Am. J. Phys. 54, 904-906; Lindgren, E R 1988 Comments on Using the Atwood mchine to study Stokes lw [Am. J. Phys. 54, 904 (1986)] Am. J. Phys. 56, 940. [6] Greenwood, M S, Bernett, R, Benvides, M, Grnger, S, Plss, R nd Wlters, S 1989 Using Smrt-pulley Atwood mchine to study rocket motion Am. J. Phys. 57, 943-946. [7] Trnopolski, M 2015 On Atwood s Mchine with Nonzero Mss String Phys. Tech. 53, 494. 5