Analysis of Terpenes in Cannabis Using the Agilent 7697A/789B/977B Headspace GC-MSD System Faster Analysis Time = Greater Productivity Application Note Cannabis, Food Authors Ronald Honnold, Robert Kubas, and Anthony Macherone Agilent Technologies, Inc. 8 Centerville Rd Wilmington, DE 988 Abstract Terpenes and terpenoids are naturally occurring volatile isoprenes constructed from a (C H 8 ) n building block where n is the number of isoprene units linked to form linear or ring molecules. In marijuana (Cannabis sativa), terpenes are biosynthesized in the flower along with other compounds such as psychoactive 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other nonpsychoactive cannabinoids []. Each strain of marijuana is characterized by its unique terpene profile, that creates the distinctive aroma and flavor []. This application note describes the analysis of terpenes common to marijuana in under 6 minutes using the Agilent 7697A/789B/977B headspace-gas chromatography-mass selective detection (HSS-GC-MSD) system with concomitant flame ionization detector (FID) detection using integrated Capillary Flow Technology to split the column effluent in a controllable and precise manner to the two detectors.
Introduction The concentration of individual terpenes in the C. sativa plant varies by strain, harvest time, and drying and storage conditions. Depending on these conditions, the relative terpene concentrations decrease over time for example, after three months of storage, levels can decrease by more than half [,]. Analysis of terpenes in C. sativa strains is typically performed using HSS-GC/MSD, using the Agilent Residual Solvent Analyzer hardware configuration to provide an optimum linear range of detection and mass spectral speciation. Experimental Hardware and consumables Agilent 7697A Headspace Sampler, Agilent 789B GC with FID, and Agilent 977B MSD (Residual Solvent Analyzer) Split/Splitless Inlet Purged Two-Way Splitter: split : FID:MSD Agilent Headspace liner, Ultra Inert, splitless, straight mm (p/n 9-7) Agilent ml Headspace vials (p/n 9-8) Agilent Headspace vial caps (p/n 8-6) Agilent VF- column, m. mm,. µm (p/n CP8877) MSD Restrictor - Deactivated Fused Silica.7 m µm µm FID Restrictor - Deactivated Fused Silica.7 m µm µm Certified terpene reference standards 9-DGEQ and 96 DGEQ were obtained from Restek (Bellefonte, PA). Agilent 7697 Headspace parameters Parameter Instrument settings Vial pressurization gas Loop size Keyboard lock Transfer line type Transfer line diameter System configuration Carrier control Value Helium ml OFF DB-ProSteel. mm Oven temperature C Loop temperature C Transfer line temperature C Vial equilibration Injection duration GC cycle time Vial size GC Instrument. minutes. minutes minutes ml Vial shaking Level Fill mode Fill pressure Loop fill mode Loop ramp rate Loop final pressure Loop equilibration time Carrier control mode Extraction mode Vent after extraction Post injection purge Acceptable leak check Agilent 789B GC conditions Default psi Custom psi/min psi. minutes GC controls carrier Single extraction ON GC oven temperature 6 C Hold time Oven program Equilibration time ml/min for minutes Default,. ml/min. minutes C/min to C, hold minutes then C/min to C, hold. minutes minute Max temperature 6 C Column flow Front S/SL inlet He mode. ml/min Split Heater C Pressure Total flow Septum purge flow Gas saver 9. psi ml/min Off Split ratio : MSD Transfer line 6 C ml/min at minutes
Agilent 977B MSD conditions Acquisition mode Solvent delay Tune file Scan ( m/z m/z)).8 minutes etune.u EM Setting mode Gain = Scan speed Scan parameters Threshold Normal MSD Source temperature C MSD Quadrupole temperature C FID Conditions Detector temperature C H Flow Air flow Makeup flow Flame and electrometer ml/min ml/min ml/min On Aux EPC supplies Column with. ml/min constant flow to Restrictor going to the MSD, FID/MSD split ratio approximately :. Aux EPC FID F.7 psi Standards, sample preparation, and quantitation Standard calibrator preparation For quantitation, a seven-point calibration curve from ppm to, ppm was created from the terpene reference standards by adding µl of each pre-prepared calibration level to a ml headspace vial, and capping the vial. The calibrator levels were:,,,,,, and, ppm. Sample preparation For cannabis plant material, it is recommended that samples be frozen prior to grinding, or that grinding occur under liquid nitrogen. This keeps the samples cold during the grinding process, reducing loss of the more volatile terpenes. The headspace method uses full evaporation technique (FET) standard preparation. Since cannabis product matrices are extremely varied, and plant material will not dissolve in solvent, sampling involves the use of a very small sample amount ( mg) of plant or wax material weighed into the headspace vial, which is then capped and analyzed. For this study, a challenge sample of lemon grass tea was prepared to demonstrate the power of mass spectrometry to differentiate targeted terpenes from interfering chemical compounds often found in real samples. From headspace sampler S/S Inlet m. mm, µm Purged splitter. ml/min F Constant flow mode Column =. ml/min MSD flow =. ml/min FID/MSD split ratio = : MSD psi Quantitation The terpene concentrations in the unknown samples were determined in Agilent MassHunter quantitative software through linear regression analysis of the linear calibration curve constructed from the known calibrator levels. Figure. Capillary flow diagram of the Agilent 789B configured with a two-way splitter for simultaneous collection of FID and MSD data.
Results and Discussion The analytical method developed in this study is ultra fast, robust, and reliable. It leverages the large dynamic range of FID detection and mass spectral confirmation to identify and quantitate targeted terpenes found in cannabis and cannabis wax samples. Figure illustrates the chromatography for both the FID and the MSD at,, and, ppm. All terpenes elute in less than 6 minutes, and the total cycle-time (injection to injection) is minutes. Figure shows typical calibration curves for select terpenes, where the average linear regression coefficient (R ) was.997 for the FID data, and.998 for the MSD. Figure shows the extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) for alpha pinene with the FID and MSD calibration curves over the, ppm range. Table outlines the average retention time (RT), average concentration, the standard deviation, and the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) for the target concentration, the limit of quantitation (LOQ), the limit of detection (LOD), the average response factor, and the %RSD the average response factor of eight replicate injections of a ppm standard..... 6.. 6 7... 6.. ppm scan ppm FID ppm scan ppm FID, ppm scan, ppm FID.....6.7.8.9.......6.7.8.9.......6.7.8.9.... Acquisition time (min) Figure. FID and MSD chromatograms at ppm, ppm, and, ppm of the -compound terpene mix.
Camphene FID 6 7 8 9,,,, Concentration (ng/ml) beta-myrcene FID 6 7 8 9,,,, Concentration (ng/ml) 6...8.6.. Camphene MS 6 7 8 9,,,, Concentration (ppm) 9 beta-myrcene MS 8 7 6 6 7 8 9,,,, Concentration (ppm) beta-pinene FID 6 8,, Concentration (ng/ml).8.6....8.6.. beta-pinene MS 6 8,, Concentration (ppm) Figure. Typical MSD and FID terpene calibration curves over the ppm to, ppm calibration levels. Counts...9.8.7.6.......9.8.7.6..... A. minutes B MSD Calibration y = 7.798*x + 9.9 R =.999 C FID Calibration y = 7.7*x 7.8997 R =.99767..... Acquisition time (min) Figure. Ten-ppm extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) for alpha-pinene. Calibration levels range from ppm to, ppm.
Table. Analysis of Eight Replicates of ppm Standard Name RT Avg. conc. Std. dev. Conc. %RSD LOQ LOD Avg. resp. Resp. %RSD alpha-pinene FID. 9..6.9.6.9 77 alpha-pinene..7.8.8.8. 87.7 Camphene FID.7 8.88...7.6 79. Camphene....6..9.6 beta-myrcene FID.7 9...9..9.9 beta-myrcene.8 9..8.7 8.6 8. 67.9 beta-pinene FID.6 9.7..9.8.7 6699 beta-pinene.76..8..8 6.8 797. delta--carene FID.9 9.7.8.87.6 878 delta--carene.69.76.9.8 9.6.77 77.8 alpha-terpinene FID.98 9.6.6.7.68. 88.8 alpha-terpinene.6 9..6. 6.7.8 6. D-Limonene FID.6 9.9..9..6 7.9 D-Limonene.68.9.6. 6..8 9. beta-ocimene FID.687 9.....7 9. beta-ocimene.699 9..87.8 8.7.6 8 p-cymene FID.7 8.99....66 868. p-cymene.7..69. 6.98.9 79. Eucalyptol FID.7.98.6. 6..8. Eucalyptol.7 9....6 66 gamma-terpinene FID.787.7. 7...7 869 6.7 gamma-terpinene.797.8... 78 Terpinolene FID.9 9..7.79. 67 Terpinolene.9.8.77. 7.7. 668. Linalool FID.96 9...9..9 6.9 Linalool.97 8..7..7. 98.7 Isopulegol FID.8 8.99..9..7 7.9 Isopulegol..8... 6.69 79 6. Geraniol FID.9 9.68..7.9..7 Geraniol.6 7.9....6 699.6 beta-caryophyllene FID.6.6..6..9 6.6 beta-caryophyllene.7 6.9.... 9. alpha-humulene FID...9.6.9.88 6.6 alpha-humulene. 7.8.... 686. Nerolidol FID.8..7 7. 8.7 9 Nerolidol.9.9.9.8.99.79 9. Nerolidol FID.9.6.9.9.9.7 878.9 Nerolidol.67 9.69..9.7.67 66. Guaiol FID.8.6.79. 7.9.8 7. Guaiol.86..66.7 6.67. 9. Caryophyllene oxide FID.96 7.9.99.7 9.9.97 7.7 Caryophyllene oxide.99.7.8..8.8 9868.6 alpha-bisabolol FID.9.7.7. 7.9. 9. alpha-bisabolol. 9.8.8. 8..9.7 6
7 A 6 Counts Counts 7 B 6.....6.7.8.9.......6.7.8.9.......6.7.8.9... Acquisition time (min) Figure. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) comparison of a ppm terpene reference standard (B) versus a mg challenge sample of lemon grass tea (A) known to contain similar terpenes and other compound that may interfere with proper identification when only using FID detection. Counts Counts. A.......... B....... -......6.7.8.9.......6.7.8.9.......6.7.8.9... Acquisition time (min) Figure 6. FID chromatogram comparing a ppm terpene reference standard (B) with a mg sample of lemon grass tea (A). When using FID detection only, the peak at. minutes may be misidentified as alpha-pinene. 7
Figure 7. The nearly coeluting peak in the challenge sample (lemon grass tea) shown in the top chromatogram and spectrum is clearly different from the alpha-pinene spectrum of the terpene reference standard. This illustrates the advantage of MSD selectivity to rule out interfering species that may otherwise be misidentified as a target analyte when using FID detection alone. The use of both FID and MSD allows for more comprehensive data analysis, as terpenes are often in high percent values, which would saturate the MS, whereas the FID will not saturate. Optimized conditions were obtained using the 7697A method development tools and a parameter increment function built into the software. These tools sequentially optimize the headspace oven temperature, vial equilibration time, and vial shaking level by a set amount over a series of analytical runs. By using the Agilent 7697A tools, the final method can rapidly be optimized versus using manual optimization of other headspace systems. For this analysis, a constant incubation temperature and extraction time was used to ensure volatilization of all terpenes and terpenoids in the sample for reproducible, quantitative results. The Prep Ahead feature of the 7697A headspace system allows an optimum workflow for the short sample analysis time. 8
Conclusion Using the Agilent Residual Solvent Analyzer with an Agilent VF GC column and appropriate restrictors enables full chromatographic separation of targeted terpenes that naturally occur in C. sativa plant material and wax samples and give the plant its distinctive aroma and character. The analysis completed in less than 6 minutes, and uses both FID detection for quantification and extended linear range, and mass selective detection (MSD) for terpene speciation. This ultra-fast methodology almost quadruples laboratory productivity compared to traditional terpene analysis, which takes approximately minutes per sample. References. M. W. Giese, et al. Development and Validation of a Reliable and Robust Method for the Analysis of Cannabinoids and Terpenes in Cannabis Napro Research, California ().. J. M. Parland, E. B. Russo. Cannabis and Cannabis Extracts: Greater than the Sum of Their Parts? The Haworth Press, Pennsylvania ().. E. Russo. Taming THC: Potential Cannabis Synergy and Phytocannabinoid-Terpenoid Entourage Effects British Journal of Pharmacology 6, ().. Chemistry and Analysis of Phytocannabinoids and Other Cannabis Constituents. Humana Press, New Jersey. For More Information These data represent typical results. For more information on our products and services, visit our Web site at www.agilent.com/chem. 9
www.agilent.com/chem Agilent products and solutions are intended to be used for cannabis quality control and safety testing in laboratories where such use is permitted under state/country law. Agilent shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. Information, descriptions, and specifications in this publication are subject to change without notice. Agilent Technologies, Inc., 7 Printed in the USA September 6, 7 99-899EN