Sustainable Disaster Prevention Measures around the Kirishima Volcano

Similar documents
GENERAL. CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE GUIDELINES Background of the Guidelines Purpose of the Guidelines...

Volcano Disaster Prevention Work of the Cabinet Office

GUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER DEVELOPMENT OF WARNING AND EVACUATION SYSTEM AGAINST SEDIMENT DISASTERS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (July, 2012)

Risk Management Strategy

Practical Example of the Use of a Volcano Hazard Map in 2000 Eruption of the Usu Volcano

SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN ARMENIA

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (April 2015)

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (March 2013)

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (February 2016)

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (August 2015)

In Issue of International Sabo News Letter

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 5-1. Risk Assessment and Hazard Mapping. CLUSTER 5: Hazard and Risk Information and Decision Making. Public Disclosure Authorized

Geography Education Challenges Regarding Disaster Mitigation in Japan

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (November 2015)

68. Izu-Torishima. Summary. Latitude: 30 29'02" N, Longitude: '11" E, Elevation: 394 m (Ioyama) (Elevation Point) (68.

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (March, 2011)

Rebuilding Flood-Conscious Society

Final Presentation on Disaster Risk Management in Japan. Through ADRC V. R Programme. Main Findings and Action Plan:

Outline of Guideline for Development and Utilization of Tsunami Disaster Management Map

Progress Report. Flood Hazard Mapping in Thailand

What Are Disasters? The Rescue Kids Trio!

4-3-1 Earthquake and Tsunami Countermeasures of Tokyo s

ACTIVITIES OF THE HEADQUARTERS FOR EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH PROMOTION

19. Esan Continuously Monitored by JMA

8 Current Issues and Research on Sediment Movement in the River Catchments of Japan

ANALYSIS OF EVACUATION BEHAVIORS IN DIFFERENT AREAS BEFORE AND AFTER THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE

Flood Management in Japan

Hazard Resilience Index (HRI) Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Volcanoes

NGIAs' roles in successful disaster response

Natural Processes. Were you prepared for the fast approaching storm? Were you able to take shelter? What about pets, livestock or plants?

Born in Unzen The World s First Unmanned Construction of Multilayer Sediment Control Dam Using Sediment Forms Unzen Restoration Project Office

Volcano Monitoring JPTM2018. Nov. 1 st, 2018

Outline of Sediment Disaster Early Warning in Japan

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGE OF GROUND AND LIQUEFACTION OCCURRENCE IN THE 2011 GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE

Continuously Monitored by JMA. Overview of Kuchinoerabujima taken from the East on July 23, 1996 by the Japan Meteorological Agency

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (February, 2011)

Monthly Volcanic Activity Report (April 2013)

89. Wakamiko. Summary. Latitude: ' N, Longitude: ' E, Depth: -77 m (Central cone) (89. Wakamiko)

Seismic Activity and Crustal Deformation after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

HISTORY OF HEAVY RAINFALL DISASTER INFORMATION IN JAPAN

-Sharing concepts and techniques among Switzerland, Japan, Taiwan, and other SBT-leading countries-

Interpretive Map Series 24

NATIONWIDE SITE AMPLIFICATION ZONATION STUDY USING JAPAN ENGINEERING GEOMORPHOLOGIC CLASSIFICATION MAP

Impacts of Climate Change and Water-Related Disaster Reduction Management in the Asia-Pacific Region

RVO s Mission Statement and some of the Key Result Areas stated below captures some of these alternative best practices.

Sediment Disasters and Mass Movement (SD&M 2 ) NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Disclaimer. This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC member countries.

Assessing Hazards and Risk

Aira/Sakura-jima. Kyushu, Japan N, E; summit elev m. All times are local (= UTC + 9 hours)

Jeopardy. Final Jeopardy $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $300 $300 $300 $300 $400 $400 $400 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500

Evacuation Alarm Using the Improved Magnitude Method to Damage Caused by Typhoon 9918

Safety Procedures for Volcanic Activity in the United States and Japan

TWO LARGE-SCALE LANDSLIDE DAMS AND OUTBURST DISASTER IN THE SHINANO RIVER, CENTRAL JAPAN

Damage Estimation of the Road Bridge Structure Using the Seismic Hazard map for BCM in Hokkaido, Japan

The Japanese Coordinating Committee for Prediction of Volcanic Eruptions and its Contribution to Volcanic Disaster Mitigation

1. Outline of the Workshop

DEBRIS FLOW DISASTER MITIGATION THROUGH COMMUNITY-BASED INTEGRATED SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT (BEST PRACTICE IN MT. MERAPI AREA, INDONESIA)

Emergency Sabo Works for Volcanic Disaster Reduction in Japan - Mt. Asamayama: A Case Study -

INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS VOLCANO WATCH OPERATIONS GROUP (IAVWOPSG)

Mechanism of tsunami generation,propagation and runup -sharing experiences with Japanese

Figure 8-21 Distribution of Lava Flow for the Model

Latitude: 43 25'03" N, Longitude: '52" E, Elevation: 1,692 m (Maruyama) (Triangulation Point)

4.Mashu. Summary. Latitude: 43 34'20" N, Longitude: '39" E, Elevation: 857 m (Kamuinupuri) (Elevation Point) (4. Mashu)

Latitude: 42 49'36" N, Longitude: '41" E, Elevation: 1,898 m (Ezo-Fuji) (Elevation Point)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The title of this dissertation is Quantitative Study on Natural Disasters Risk

held on 4 June 2013 Prof. Yoshimori Honkura, Program Officer of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Jakarta, Indonesia Pan Pacific Hotel)

Problems Associated with Activity Assessment, Dissemination of Information, and Disaster Response During the 2000 Eruption of Miyakejima

History of International Training in Seismology and Earthquake Engineering at IISEE

Slope Management Planning for the Mitigation of Landslide Disaster in Urban Areas

Latitude: 39 57'28" N, Longitude: '15" E, Elevation: 1,613 m (Hachimantai) (Triangulation Point)

Kadovar Eruption: Multi-Hazard Monitoring and Response

Estimation of Damage Ratios of Wooden Houses and Water Distribution Pipelines in an Earthquake Scenario for the Tokyo Metropolitan Region

RISK ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY PROFILE NATURAL HAZARDS COMMUNITY RISK PROFILES. Page 13 of 524

Roles of NGII in successful disaster management

CHALLENGES ON SEDIMENT- RELATED DISASTER MITIGATION

IG-WRDRR, UNESCAP, UNESCO-IOC, WMO. Yukio Tamura Chairman, International. Group. Tuesday 10 May, , Room 13. for Disaster. Risk.

Lesson 8. Natural Disasters

Debris flow: categories, characteristics, hazard assessment, mitigation measures. Hariklia D. SKILODIMOU, George D. BATHRELLOS

Continuously Monitored by JMA. Overview of Niigata-Yakeyama taken from the north side on September 29, 2003 by the Japan Meteorological Agency

Disaster RISK Management : Bhutanese Scenario

Continuously Monitored by JMA

Commission on Statistics in Volcanology (COSIV)

Volcanoes. volcanic hazards. Image courtesy of USGS.

A Survey of Refuge and Evacuation Path on Seoul Flood Disaster Information Map

Preparing for Eruptions What will happen in future eruptions and how can we be prepared?

Special edition paper

Kīlauea Volcano: Be a Volcanologist. Image Credit: Julien Millet / Unsplash. Final Project

Homework III. Volcanological Exercises

Heavy Rainfall Disaster in Eastern Japan Caused by Typhoon 0206 from July 9 to 12, 2002

Prevention and Mitigation of Debris Flow Hazards by Using Steel Open-Type Sabo Dams

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION UTILIZATION PROMOTION BILL

Outline and Future Strategies of SABO Works in Japan. Koji Nishiyama

Also, when Cascade volcanoes do erupt, high-speed avalanches of pyroclastic flows

Lessons learnt from 2014 Mt Ontake and 2000 Mt Usu eruptions: findings from a post-eruption ballistic impact assessment trip to Japan

2014 Summer training course for slope land disaster reduction Taipei, Taiwan, Aug

Wildfire WG Monitoring of Heat Related Disaster using Volcano and Wildfire monitoring system

SCIENCE. Natural Disasters ARTHUR P. SCHALICK HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM PITTSGROVE TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT PITTSGROVE, NJ

Predicting Tsunami Inundated Area and Evacuation Road Based On Local Condition Using GIS

Transcription:

Disaster Mitigation of Debris Flows, Slope Failures and Landslides 687 Sustainable Disaster Prevention Measures around the Kirishima Volcano Takeshi Honda, Kazuo Yamanaka, Hirokazu Iita, Munehiro Matsui, 1) Kaname Fujiwara and Akihiro Maeda 2) 1) General Disaster Prevention Department SABO TECHNICAL CENTER, 4-8-21 Kudan-minami Chiyoda-ku,Tokyo,102-0074, JAPAN (t-honda@stc.or.jp, k-yamanaka@stc.or.jp, h-iita@stc.or.jp, matsui@stc.or.jp) 2) Miyazaki Office of River and National Highway, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2-39 Daiku Miyazaki-city, Miyazaki, 880-8523, JAPAN Abstract The Kirishima volcano group famous for active volcano in Japan is located around the border between Miyazaki and Kagoshima Prefecture. The relatively young volcano of about 20 erupted on the old volcano basement which exists near southern part of Kakuto caldera. According to the record, among the Kirishima volcano group, Ohachi and Shinmoedake erupted intermittently in the past. Even in recent, the volcanic activity with volcanic tremor and a volcanic earthquake continued at the Ohachi in December 2003 and at Shinmoedake in February 2006. Studying of the emergency counter measures experienced in case of the eruption of Usuzan and Miyakejima in 2000, it is recognized to establish the mutual cooperation system throughout the agency concerned across the border of prefectural government around the Kirishima volcano group. Aiming to establish such system, the investigation committee in which the agencies concerned gathered was organized, and the actual action of crisis management in case of other volcanoes was studied over two years. The fundamental directivity and the integrated volcanic disaster prevention measure on the Kirishima volcano group is going to become clear from the teachings of other volcanoes studied by this committee. In this paper, such contents and scope of further steps are to introduce. Keywords: volcano, emergency countermeasures, sustainable disaster prevention Introduction The Kirishima volcano group consists of more than 20 big and small volcanoes that lay on the border of Miyazaki and Kagoshima Prefecture (Fig. 1). Active volcanic activity of this group has been confirmed in historical times. On the other hand, the importance of establishing a hazard map and sharing disaster information as well as development of volcano monitoring/observation systems for implementing volcanic disaster prevention measures was reacknowledged as a result of the successive eruption of Usuzan (Hokkaido) and Miyakejima (Tokyo) in 2000. In view of this need, the country, prefectures, cities and towns related to the Kirishima volcano group have decided to mutually cooperate and work on the enhancement of a wide-area disaster prevention system. Volcanic activities of Kirishima volcano group Kirishima volcano group has been active for more than 100,000 years and has formed more than 20 volcanoes up to this day. However, the volcanic activities ascertained in historical times are only with three volcanoes; Shinmoedake, Ohachi and Ioyama. Shinmoedake, particularly, had a relatively major eruption in 1716 to 1717, which claimed 5 lives and caused considerable damage in surrounding areas with ash fall and debris flow. As far as recent volcanic activities are concerned, Ohachi frequently erupted through Meiji era (1868 1912) and Taisho era (1912 1926) which took 8 lives mainly because of volcanic bombs (Table 1). Furthermore, Shinmoedake erupted in 1959 causing damage to forests and farm crops as well as contributed to traffic congestion due to ash fall. In more recent years, although no human casualty was reported, volcanic activities have been active continuously, such as: Shinmoedake erupted in 1991, abnormal fume was observed at Ohachi on December 2003 and an increase in volcanic earthquakes/tremors were reported at Shinmoedake on February 2006. For this reason, Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) designated the Kirishima volcano group to rank B, pp. 687 694 c 2006 by Universal Academy Press, Inc. / Tokyo, Japan

688 Fig. 1. Location of Kirishima volcano group and its major volcanoes Table 1. Human casualties due to volcanic activities of the Kirishima volcano group the middle rank of the volcanic activity degree. JMA also classified the Kirishima volcano group as a Constant Observation Volcano and has began continuous observation of volcanic activities. JMA is now providing a criterion called Volcanic Activity Level since February 2005, which numerically shows the volcanic activity degree and necessity of disaster prevention measures. Actual condition of disaster prevention measures of Kirishima volcano group and its surrondings Through 1990 to 1997, the country and prefectures took a pivotal role in preparing a volcanic disaster forecast map and focused on two measures, namely; basic plans of erosion control facility and monitoring/observation measures of sediment movement phenomena. Also in 1992, in response to the eruption of Shinmoedake in 1991, the town of Takaharu located on the north-east of the Kirishima volcano group solely prepared the Poster of Kirishima volcanic disaster prevention aid (Fig. 2). Furthermore, on March 1996, 8 cities and towns neighboring the Kirishima volcano group jointly prepared the Kirishima volcanic disaster prevention map (Fig. 3).

689 Fig. 2. Poster of Kirishima volcanic disaster prevention aid Fig. 3. Kirishima volcanic disaster prevention map

690 Characteristics of the volcanic disaster and issues posed to disaster prevention measures of Kirishima volcano group Generally, the volcanic disaster is difficult to countermeasure when compared to other kinds of disasters because of these 5 characteristics: 1) Low frequency in occurrence compared to other kinds of disasters, 2) Has possibility to be severe and affects a wide range of area, 3) Causes various kinds of phenomenon, 4) Long-term, not transient like earthquake and typhoon, and 5) The volcanic activity changes momentarily and is difficult to predict movement. Interprefectural cooperation needs to be considered for disaster prevention measures of the Kirishima volcano group as well, since, the volcano group is located across the border of Miyazaki Prefecture and Kagoshima Prefecture. When considering disaster prevention responses at the time of eruption, problems such as delay in issuing climbing restrictions, disregard of the restrictions of governmental officers and news reporters approaching the crater area arose at the time of eruption in 1959. Similar problems were observed in 1991 when Shinmoedake erupted. The emergency warning was announced several times at the time eruption, but mountain climbers were still found around the crater. Also when abnormal fume was observed at Ohachi on December 2003, prefectures and adjacent cities and towns had trouble reaching an agreement on the commencing time of the climbing restriction. Furthermore, issues arose with the disaster prevention map presented in 1996, such as: 1) Insufficient consideration to the residents or no follow-up after the preparation of the map due to lack of continuous educational activity, 2) Unclear description e.g. lava flow and pyroclastic flow were printed with same color, 3) Emergency evacuation centers were located inside the potential hazard area, and 4) Insufficient description with the sequence of the volcanic activity movement. In this manner, various issues have arose with the volcanic disaster prevention measures of the Kirishima volcano group, which necessitates a reevaluation of present volcanic disaster prevention measures. Efforts in dealing with the issues of Kirishima volcano group As it was mentioned in the previous chapter, it was confirmed that the volcanic disaster countermeasure of the Kirishima volcano group has various issues to be solved. The successive eruption of Usuzan (Hokkaido) and Miyakejima (Tokyo) in 2000 has also lead us to realize that the establishing a hazard map, thorough notification and sharing of disaster information, development of a volcano monitoring/observation system and the establishment of a mutual communication/cooperation system among governmental bodies are critical for volcanic disaster prevention. Taking this situation into account, the following efforts have been implemented in Kirishima volcano group. (1) Implementation of the Study Meeting Concerning The Volcanic Disaster Prevention of Kirishima Volcano and the Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Liaison Meeting Through the fiscal year 2003 and 2004, institutions of the country, prefectures, cities and towns held the Study Meeting Concerning The Volcanic Disaster Prevention of Kirishima Volcano 7 times to examine necessary items and measures to prepare from now in order to countermeasure the possible eruption of Kirishima volcano. The disaster prevention measures conducted during the eruption of Usuzan and Miyakejima in 2000 has provided precious lessons that contributed to these study meetings. 10 academic experts were invited to the study meetings to give lectures based on topics such as the activity condition of Kirishima volcano group and volcanic prevention examples of other volcanoes. With total of 16 lectures delivered and accumulated studies on the method of volcanic prevention for Kirishima volcano group (Table 2), the following factors were considered important: 1) Live with volcanoes by learning about the eruption phenomenon and the bounty of volcanoes,

691 Table 2. Number of lectures by topics delivered at the Study Meeting Concerning The Volcanic Disaster Prevention of Kirishima Volcano Fig. 4. The pillar and three goals of volcanic disaster prevention 2) Take disaster reduction measures which focus on reducing the disaster as much as possible rather than trying to completely prevent disasters, since disasters are long-termed and diversified, and 3) The public administration, researchers, news agencies and the residents should cooperation in preventing volcanic disasters. Moreover, the Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Liaison Meeting will be held continuously from the fiscal year 2006 to share information regarding the activity condition of Kirishima volcano and the volcanic disaster prevention measures of the public administration and others. Fire departments and the Self Defense Force will newly attend the liaison meeting with the participants of the Study Meeting Concerning The Volcanic Disaster Prevention of Kirishima Volcano. (2) Implementation of the Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Study Committee The Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Study Committee formed with academic experts and people in charge of various disaster prevention related institutions was organized starting from the fiscal year 2005. The committee studies the direction of volcanic disaster prevention with the Kirishima volcano group and the comprehensive measures for the volcanic disaster. The committee has set three goals, namely; Live with volcanoes, Disaster reduction and Building close relationship (Cooperation), and have established a specialty division (sectional committee) to study the following three items to realize the aforementioned three goals (Fig. 4 and 5): 1) Prepare a volcanic disaster forecast map which is fundamental for volcanic disaster prevention, 2) Development of specific volcanic disaster prevention measures including matters such as the clarification of the positioning of volcanic sabo plans, the development and operation of volcano monitoring/observation systems and reflection of measures to regional disaster prevention plans, and

692 Fig. 5. Constitution of Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Study Committee 3) Implement informing and educational activity to the residents. (3) Implementation of educational activity for disaster prevention In Japan, residents have growing interest in disaster prevention recently because of increasing cases of bank rip and sediment related disasters caused by localized torrential downpour and the disaster caused by earthquakes. Educational activities for disaster prevention were implemented to residents and children living in the Kirishima volcano group area since volcanic microtremor/abnormal fume were observed at Shinmoedake and Ohachi in addition to cases of heavy rain disaster within the region of the volcano group (Fig. 6). 1) Holding the Considering the volcanic disaster prevention of Southern Kyusyu symposium (2004) 2) Schoolchildren s Summer Course of Seismology and Volcanology (2005) 3) Kirishima volcano Sabo Expedition Team (2005 onward) Issues to be solved and future plans items: The Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Study Committee is planning to study on the following 1) Preparation of volcanic disaster prevention map created with residents, 2) Implementation of continuous educational activity for disaster prevention, 3) Cooperation with related institutions and information sharing, and 4) Promotion of sabo measures. The study term of the Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Study Committee is planned to continue until fiscal year 2007, and after the term, each institution will advance the measures on their own based on the suggestion given by the Committee. The implementation of the Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Liaison Meeting will be necessary in order to maintain cooperation and information sharing among the related institutions. Based on those measures, there is a necessity to further improve the disaster prevention capability in Kirishima volcano group area by means of implementing continuous educational activities for volcanic disaster prevention to the local residents. Summary We have studied in Study Meeting Concerning The Volcanic Disaster Prevention of Kirishima Volcano ; through this study meeting, the following factors were considered important: 1) Live with volcanoes by learning about the eruption phenomenon and the bounty of volcanoes, 2) Take disaster reduction measures which focus on reducing the disaster as much as possible rather than trying to completely prevent disasters, since disasters are long-termed and diversified, and 3) The public administration, researchers, news agencies and the residents should cooperation in preventing volcanic disasters.

693 Fig. 6. Examples of the educational activity for disaster prevention in Kirishima volcano group The Kirishima Volcanic Disaster Prevention Study Committee has set three goals, namely; Live with volcanoes, Disaster reduction and Building close relationship (Cooperation), and have started to study the following three items to realize the aforementioned three goals: 1) Prepare a volcanic disaster forecast map which is fundamental for volcanic disaster prevention, 2) Development of specific volcanic disaster prevention measures including matters such as the formulation of volcanic sabo plans, the development and operation of volcano monitoring/observation systems and reflection of measures to regional disaster prevention plans, and 3) Implement informing and educational activity to the residents. We are going to implement the following items; further improve the disaster prevention capability and the community planning, in Kirishima volcano group area. 1) Implementation of educational activities for volcanic disaster prevention to the local residents, and 2) Cooperation with related institutions and information sharing. References Ryusuke Imura and Tetsuo Kobayashi (1991): Eruptions of Shinmoedake Volcano, Kirishima Volcano Group, in the Last 300 years; Volcano Volume 36, No. 2, p. 135 to 148. Japan Meteorological Agency (2005), National Catalogue of the Active Volcanoes in Japan (third edition), p 525 to 536. Website of Miyazaki Office of River and National Highway (http://www.qsr.mlit.go.jp/miyazaki/). Takaharu town, Miyazaki Prefecture (1992), Poster of Kirishima volcanic disaster prevention aid.

694 Miyakonojo city / Kobayashi city / Ebino city / Takaharu town, Miyazaki Prefecture; Kurino town / Yoshimatsu town / Makizono town / Kirishima town, Kagoshima Prefecture, Kirishima volcanic disaster prevention map.