AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Aerodynamics. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017

Similar documents
AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Aerodynamics. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2015

The polar for uncambered and cambered airfoils. The angel of attack α

Drag (2) Induced Drag Friction Drag Form Drag Wave Drag

To highlight the change in drag with lift: Drag = Zero-Lift Drag + Lift-Dependent Drag + Compressibility Drag

Definitions. Temperature: Property of the atmosphere (τ). Function of altitude. Pressure: Property of the atmosphere (p). Function of altitude.

Chapter 5 Wing design - selection of wing parameters 2 Lecture 20 Topics

APPENDIX C DRAG POLAR, STABILITY DERIVATIVES AND CHARACTERISTIC ROOTS OF A JET AIRPLANE (Lectures 37 to 40)

MDTS 5705 : Aerodynamics & Propulsion Lecture 2 : Missile lift and drag. G. Leng, MDTS, NUS

Semi-Empirical Prediction of Aircraft Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics. Erik D. Olson. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681

and K becoming functions of Mach number i.e.: (3.49)

Air Loads. Airfoil Geometry. Upper surface. Lower surface

The Importance of drag

Airfoils and Wings. Eugene M. Cliff

Experimental Aerodynamics. Experimental Aerodynamics

Supersonic Aerodynamics. Methods and Applications

Drag Computation (1)

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

ν δ - 1 -

Mechanics of Flight. Warren F. Phillips. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY

Flight Vehicle Terminology

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A PISTON ENGINED AIRPLANE - PIPER CHEROKEE PA E.G.TULAPURKARA S.ANANTH TEJAS M. KULKARNI REPORT NO: AE TR

Induced Drag and High-Speed Aerodynamics Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics, MAE 331, 2018

Given the water behaves as shown above, which direction will the cylinder rotate?

AIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION

Brenda M. Kulfan, John E. Bussoletti, and Craig L. Hilmes Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, Washington, 98124

Based on the Aircraft Design Lecture Notes and Master Thesis of Roberto Segovia García. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences.

SPC Aerodynamics Course Assignment Due Date Monday 28 May 2018 at 11:30

Drag Analysis of a Supermarine. Spitfire Mk V at Cruise Conditions

Nonlinear Aerodynamic Predictions Of Aircraft and Missiles Employing Trailing-Edge Flaps

Flight Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege

A Novel Airfoil Circulation Augment Flow Control Method Using Co-Flow Jet

Masters in Mechanical Engineering Aerodynamics 1 st Semester 2015/16

F-35: A case study. Eugene Heim Leifur Thor Leifsson Evan Neblett. AOE 4124 Configuration Aerodynamics Virginia Tech April 2003

Nose Cone & Fin Optimization

Application of larger wings to create more lift force in aeroplane Lokendra Bhati 1,Rajat Malviya 2 1 B.E.in mechanical engineering, I.I.ST.

Development of a Wave Drag Prediction Tool for the Conceptual Design Phase

Stability and Control Some Characteristics of Lifting Surfaces, and Pitch-Moments

In-Flight Lift-Drag Characteristics for a Forward-Swept Wing Aircraft (and Comparisions With Contemporary Aircraft)

An Investigation of the Attainable Efficiency of Flight at Mach One or Just Beyond

Degree Project in Aeronautics

ADVERSE REYNOLDS NUMBER EFFECT ON MAXIMUM LIFT OF TWO DIMENSIONAL AIRFOILS

Reynolds Number Effects on the Performance of Lateral Control Devices

RECENT near-sonic and low-sonic boom transport aircraft

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

Compressible Potential Flow: The Full Potential Equation. Copyright 2009 Narayanan Komerath

Lecture 7 Boundary Layer

Basic Low Speed Aerodynamics

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Second Year - Second Term ( ) Fluid Mechanics & Gas Dynamics

Improved Method for Prediction of Attainable Wing Leading-Edge Thrust

Aircraft Design Studies Based on the ATR 72

Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

Continuity Equation for Compressible Flow

Configuration Aerodynamics

Part 3. Stability and Transition

9.4 Miscellaneous topics flight limitations, operating envelop and V-n diagram Flight limitations Operating envelop 9.4.

Chapter 5 Lecture 19. Performance analysis I Steady level flight 3. Topics. Chapter-5

Relaminerization of a Highly Accelerated Flow on a Convex Curvature

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOWS HINCHEY

ROAD MAP... D-1: Aerodynamics of 3-D Wings D-2: Boundary Layer and Viscous Effects D-3: XFLR (Aerodynamics Analysis Tool)

MACH NUMBERS BETWEEN 0.8 AND 2.2 AS DETERMINED FROM THE

= 390 ( R). Then, for a given edge Mach number, M e., and ratio of wall temperature to adiabatic wall temperature T W = T W. T AW = T e 2 M e 2

( ) (where v = pr ) v V

LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND TRIM OF AN ARIANE 5 FLY-BACK BOOSTER

Given a stream function for a cylinder in a uniform flow with circulation: a) Sketch the flow pattern in terms of streamlines.

AOE 3104 Problem Sheet 10 (ans)

AAE 251 Formulas. Standard Atmosphere. Compiled Fall 2016 by Nicholas D. Turo-Shields, student at Purdue University. Gradient Layer.

PEMP ACD2501. M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru

Wings and Bodies in Compressible Flows

Fundamentals of Aerodynamits

An Investigation of the Attainable Efficiency of Flight at Mach One or Just Beyond

Consider a wing of finite span with an elliptic circulation distribution:

The Wright Stuff. Engineering Analysis. Aaron Lostutter Adam Nelessen Brandon Perez Zev Vallance Jacob Vincent. November 2012

RESEARCH MEMORANDUM FUGHT CHARACTERSSTICS OF A WINGIZSS ROCKET-POWERED MODEL WITH FOUR EXTERNALLY MOUNTED AIR-TO-APR MISSILES,$ Langley.Field, Va.

Aerodynamic Classification of Swept-Wing Ice Accretion

AIAA Investigation of Reynolds Number Effects on a Generic Fighter Configuration in the National Transonic Facility (Invited)

Transonic Aerodynamics Wind Tunnel Testing Considerations. W.H. Mason Configuration Aerodynamics Class

University of California at Berkeley Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 163 ENGINEERING AERODYNAMICS FINAL EXAM, 13TH DECEMBER 2005

Royal Aeronautical Society 2016 Applied Aerodynamics Conference Tuesday 19 th Thursday 21 st July Science Centre, Bristol, UK

AFWAL-TM & AIRFRAME BRANCH JULY UNLIMITED

Flight Testing of Laminar Flow Control in High-Speed Boundary Layers

PEMP ACD2505. Finite Wing Theory. M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru

ACTIVE SEPARATION CONTROL ON A SLATLESS 2D HIGH-LIFT WING SECTION

Applied Fluid Mechanics

What is the crack propagation rate for 7075-T6 aluminium alloy.

Aerodynamics of Wedge-Shaped Deflectors for Jet Noise Reduction

Project 2 Conceptual Design

COLD WEATHER PROTECTION GENERAL

Mach number, relative thickness, sweep and lift coefficient of the wing - An empirical investigation of parameters and equations

Test-to-Test Repeatability of Results From a Subsonic Wing-Body Configuration in the National Transonic Facility

Reynolds number influence on high agility aircraft vortical flows

Design of a Droopnose Configuration for a Coanda Active Flap Application. Marco Burnazzi and Rolf Radespiel

TUTORIAL SHEET 1. magnitude of P and the values of ø and θ. Ans: ø =74 0 and θ= 53 0

General Remarks and Instructions

Introduction to Atmospheric Flight. Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)

Aerodynamics. High-Lift Devices

Investigation potential flow about swept back wing using panel method

Introduction to Flight

Figure 3.71 example of spanwise loading due to aileron deflection.

DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, IIT MADRAS M.Tech. Curriculum

Chapter 3 Lecture 8. Drag polar 3. Topics. Chapter-3

Transcription:

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Aerodynamics Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017

Lift curve 2

Lift curve slope 3

Subsonic lift curve slope C Lα = 2 + 4 + AR2 β 2 η 2 2πAR 1 + tan2 Λ max,t β 2 S exposed S F Valid until M dd, fairly accurate until M=1. β 2 = 1 M 2 η: airfoil efficiency, = 0.95 for most airfoils. F = 1.07 1 + d/b 2, fuselage lift factor. AR eff = AR(1 + 1.9 h b); effective AR with endplates, h: height of the endplate. AR eff 1.2AR; effective AR with winglets. 4

Supersonic lift curve slope Theory: C Lα = 4 β Practice: use the charts valid for trapezoidal wings. Correct the values read with S exposed S F 5

Supersonic lift curve slope 6

Maximum lift (clean) For moderate to high aspect ratio wings with moderate sweep and high leading edge radius: C L,max = 0.9c l,max cosλ c/4 If a wing has low AR or high sweep and a sharp leading edge, maximum lift will increase due to leading edge vortices. This is a function of the shape of the upper surface of the leading edge: y = y 0.06c y 0.015c 7

Maximum lift (clean) 8

Maximum lift (clean) 9

Maximum lift (clean) For high aspect ratio wings: C L,max = c l,max C L,max c l,max + C L,max, Correct for F, S exposed. S α CL,max = C L,max C L,α + α 0L + α CL,max 10

Maximum lift (clean) 11

Maximum lift (clean) 12

Maximum lift (clean) 13

Maximum lift (clean) A wing has low AR if: AR 3 C 1 +1 cos Λ LE. C L,max = C L,max,base + C L,max. α CL,max = α CL,max,base + α CL,max 14

Maximum lift (clean) 15

Maximum lift (clean) 16

Maximum lift (clean) 17

Maximum lift (clean) 18

Maximum lift (clean) At transonic speeds, maximum lift is limited by structural buffeting and controllability considerations rather than aerodynamics. 19

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) 20

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) 21

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) 22

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) Trailing edge devices decrease the stall angle of attack by increasing the pressure drop over the top of the airfoil promoting flow separation. In order to increase α stall a leading edge device must be used. C L,max = 0.9 c l,max S flapped S cosλ HL α 0L = α 0L,airfoil S flapped S cosλ HL HL: hinge line of the high lift device 23

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) For takeoff, the increments of about 60-80% of the increment calculated above should be used. Maximum lift occurs at a flap setting of about 40 o -45 o. α0l,airfoil 15 o (landing setting), α0l,airfoil 10 o (takeoff setting), 24

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) 25

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) 26

Maximum lift (with high lift devices) Leading edge devices increase lift by: Increasing camber, Increasing wing area, Delaying separation. Leading edge devices are particularly useful at high α. During takeoff and landing, they are useful when in combination with trailing edge devices as they prevent stall. 27

Estimation of C Do, equivalent skin friction method C Do = S wet S C fe C fe : equivalent skin friction coefficient is a function of the Reynolds number, Re. 28

Equivalent skin friction coefficients 29

Wetted area ratio 30

Estimation of C Do, component build-up method Total parasite drag coefficient: ) C Do subsonic = C fcff c Q c S wet,c S + C D,misc + C D,L&P C fc : flat plate skin friction coefficient, C fc = C fc Re, M, k ; k: skin roughness. FF c : form factor, estimates pressure drag due to separation, Q: interference factor. C D,misc : drag of flaps, landing gears, upswept aft fuselage, base area. C D,L&P : drag of leakages and protuberances. 31

Flat plate skin friction coefficient Laminar flow: C f = 1.328 Re, Re = ρ V l, μ l: characteristic length. Turbulent flow: C f = 0.455 log Re 2.58 1 + 0.144M 2 0.65 32

Flat plate skin friction coefficient 33

Flat plate skin friction coefficient If the surface is rough, the skin friction coefficient will be higher. The smaller of the cut-off Reynolds number and the actual Reynolds number shall be used. Subsonic flow: Re cutoff = 38.21 l k 1.053, Transonic or Supersonic flow: Re cutoff = 44.62 l k 1.053 M 1.16 34

Flat plate skin friction coefficient 35

Component form factors Wing, tail, strut and pylon: FF = 1 + 0.6 x/c m t c + 100 t c 4 1.34M 0.18 cos Λ m 0.28 x c m : chordwise location of the maximum thickness point, Λ m : sweep angle at the same location 36

Component form factors Fuselage and smooth canopy: f = l d = FF = 1 + 60 f 3 + l 4 π A max : fineness ratio. Nacelle and external stores: FF = 1 + 0.35 f f 400 37

Component form factors For a tail surface with a hinged control surface: +10% A square sided fuselage: +40% For a two piece canopy: +40% For an external boundary-layer diverter for a fuselage mounted inlet: Double wedge: FF = 1 + d l, Single wedge: FF = 1 + 2d l. 38

Component form factors 39

Component interference factors Nacelle or external store mounted on wing or fuselage: Q=1.5. Nacelle or external store mounted on wing or fuselage: Q=1.3 (if mounted less than one diameter away). Nacelle or external store mounted on wing or fuselage: Q=1.1 (if mounted more than one diameter away). Wingtip mounted missiles: Q=1.25. High-wing, mid-wing or a well-filleted low-wing: Q=1.0. Unfilleted low-wing: Q=1.1-1.4. Fuselage: Q=1.0. Tail surfaces: Q=1.03 (V-tail), 1.08 (H-Tail), 1.04-1.05 (conventional tail). 40

Miscellaneous drag Upswept aft fuselage: D q = 3.83θ2.5 A max. 41

Miscellaneous drag Landing gear: summation of the drags of the wheels, struts, and other gear components. Q=1.2, *1.07 for retractable landing gears accounting for the hollow landing gear well. 42

Miscellaneous drag Flaps: C Do,flap = F flap c flap c S flapped S δ flap 10 o. F flap = 0.0144: plain flaps, F flap = 0.0074: slotted flaps. Speed brakes: Fuselage mounted: D q = 1.0A frontal Wing mounted: D q = 1.6A frontal 43

Miscellaneous drag Canopies (transport and light aircraft): D q = 0.50A frontal,wind shield Cannon port: D q = 0.2 ft2. 44

Leakage and protuberance drag Antennas, lights, door edges, fuel vents, control surface external hinges, actuator fairings, rivets, rough or misaligned panels Jet transports and bombers: 2-5% parasite drag, Propeller aircraft: 5-10%, Fighters: 10-15% (old), 5-10% (new). 45

Supersonic Wave Drag For supersonic skin friction drag Q = FF = 1. ) C D0 s.sonic = C fcs wet S + C D,misc + C D,L&P + C D,wave Leakage and protuberance drag percentages apply only to skin-friction drag. For preliminary wave drag analysis (M 1.2): 0.77 D = E q wd 1 0.386(M 1.2) 0.57 1 πλ LE,deg wave 100 D q Sears Haack 46

Sears-Haack body 47

Supersonic wave drag E wd : wave drag efficiency factor. =1.0 for a perfect Sears-Haack body, =1.2 for a smooth volume distribution, blended delta wing, =1.8-2.2 for a supersonic fighter, bomber. D q Sears Haack = 9π 2 A max l 2 ; subtract inlet capture area. l: aircraft length length with constant cross sectional area. 48

Transonic wave drag Boeing formulation: M DD = M DD,L=0 LF DD 0.05C L,design wing. 49

Transonic wave drag 50

Transonic wave drag 51

Transonic wave drag L n : length of fuselage from nose to the location where fuselage cross section becomes constant. d: equivalent diameter of the fuselage there. Choose the smaller of the M dd found for wing and fuselage for the drag divergence Mach number of the airplane. 52

Transonic wave drag For initial analysis: 53

Transonic wave drag M 1.2: use supersonic wave drag expression. C D,wave M = 1.05 = C D,wave M = 1.2. C D,wave M = 1.0 = C D,wave M=1.05 2 M cr = M DD 0.08.. C D M DD = C D M cr + 0.002. 54

Complete drag build-up Subsonic drag: skin friction drag (including form factor and interference) + miscellaneous drag + leakage & protuberance drag Supersonic drag: skin friction drag + miscellaneous drag + leakage and protuberance drag + wave drag. 55

Complete drag build-up 56

Complete drag build-up 57

Drag due to lift (induced drag) Induced drag coefficient: K = 1 πare Straight-winged airplane: e = 1.78 1 0.045AR 0.68 0.64 (Λ LE < 30 o ) Swept winged airplane: e = 4.61 1 0.045AR 0.68 cos Λ 0.15 LE 3.1 (Λ LE > 30 o ) At supersonic speeds: K = AR(M2 1) 4AR M 2 1 2 cos Λ LE 58

Drag due to lift (induced drag) Flap effect on induced drag: C Di = K f 2 ( C L,flap ) 2 cos Λ c 4, K f = 0.14: full span flaps, K f = 0.28: partial span flaps. 59