The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG)

Similar documents
El proyecto Sistema de Observación Geodésico Global [Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS)] de la Asociación Internacional de Geodesia (IAG)

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy, IAG

REGIONAL REFERENCE FRAMES: THE IAG PERSPECTIVE

Global & National Geodesy, GNSS Surveying & CORS Infrastructure

GGOS Bureau for Standards and Conventions

SIRGAS: Basis for Geosciences, Geodata, and Navigation in Latin America

GGOS, ECGN and NGOS: Global and regional geodetic observing systems. Markku Poutanen Finish Geodetic Institute

Fundamental Station Wettzell - geodetic observatory -

Geodetic Observing Systems: tools in observing the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment. Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute

A Unique Reference Frame: Basis of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for Geodynamics and Global Change

Dependences in the pillar Earth s gravity field of

GGOS The Global Geodetic Observing System of the International Association of Geodesy

GGOS. Global Geodetic Observing System. Carey Noll NASA GSFC (on behalf of GGOS) WDS Forum September 11, 2016

Establishment of a Global Absolute Gravity Network

Strategy for the Realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)

GG S Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS): Status and Future. Markus Rothacher, Ruth Neilan, Hans-Peter Plag

GGOS INFORMATION MODELS: ANALYSIS OF INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN OBSERVATION TECHNIQUES AND THE EARTH GRAVITY FIELD

GG S. Internal Vision of GGOS. Markus Rothacher. GFZ Potsdam

Report for 15th PCGIAP Meeting at 18th UNRCC-AP Working Group 1 Regional Geodesy

GGOS The Global Geodetic Observing System of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG)

Global Geodetic Reference Frame GGRF & Implications for GNSS

Reference Systems Realization for the Territory of Bulgaria - Status and Perspectives

The Interactions between IGS and GGOS

Status. EUREF TWG Meeting November 8 9, 2004, Praha

Lecture 2 Measurement Systems. GEOS 655 Tectonic Geodesy

Reference frames and positioning

Consideration of a Global Vertical Reference System (GVRS) in the IERS Conventions

Working Group 1. Geodetic Reference Frame. Activity Report. for. The UN-GGIM-AP Plenary Meeting

Torsten Mayer-Gürr Institute of Geodesy, NAWI Graz Technische Universität Graz

From Global to National Geodetic Reference Frames: how are they connected and why are they needed?

Summary of the 2012 Global Geophysical Fluid Center Workshop

INTERNATIONAL SLR SERVICE

Background Document: Report of the Regional Committee of United Nations Global Geospatial Information Management for Asia and the Pacific

Specification of the Baltic Sea Chart Datum 2000 (BSCD2000)

UN Resolution on GGRF ( and its implementation in Europe)

International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics. Resolutions

New satellite mission for improving the Terrestrial Reference Frame: means and impacts

Preface. About this book. Background

What are the social, technical, environmental and economic benefits and opportunities of accessing and sharing geodetic data?

Global vertical datum unification based on the combination of the fixed gravimetric and the scalar free geodetic boundary value problems

UN-GGIM: Europe GRF-Europe. Markku Poutanen

Update on the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) : ITRF2014. Zuheir Altamimi

The Kinematic Reference Frame for ITRF

Global reference systems and Earth rotation

Incorporation of the Caribbean to the Geocentric Reference System for the Americas SIRGAS

International Gravity Field Service (IGFS)

Roadmap Towards Future Satellite Gravity Missions in Support of Monitoring of Mass Redistribution, Global Change, and Natural Hazards

Linking the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) (IGOS-P) through the Theme Earth System Dynamics. with the Integrated Global Observing Strategy

NGS is Scheduled to Replace NAVD 88 and NAD 83 In 2022

GEO-VIII November Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Progress Report. Document 9

A Strategic Plan for Geodesy in Sweden. Mikael Lilje Lars E. Engberg Geodesy Department Lantmäteriet Sweden

Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) and GGOS. Andrea Donnellan NASA/JPL February 21, 2007

Towards a Rigorous Combination of Space Geodetic Techniques

Economic and Social Council 2 July 2015

FIG Asia Pacific Capacity Development Network

A Glimpse at Geodetic Activities in Latin America

Positioning in the Pacific Islands

MSGIC Spring Mtg Denton April 23, 2014

Detailed Geoid Model for Africa Final Report

RELATIVISTIC ASPECTS IN ASTRONOMICAL STANDARDS AND THE IERS CONVENTIONS

Modernization of National Geodetic Datum in China *

Cooperation is the key, FIG can facilitate

COUNTRY REPORT THE SEVENTEENTH PERMANENT COMMITTEE ON GIS INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (PCGIAP) MEETING JULY 21 22, 2011,

What does EUREF considers as a realisation of EVRS?

Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

The European Surveying Plot A surveying map of land property: A proposal and it s perspectives

Physical Dynamics of the Coastal Zone in the Mediterranean on Annual to Decadal Scales

Understanding Earth Rotation Part 2: Physical Foundations and Interpretation

Economic and Social Council

Faatasi Malologa (PGSC Chair) Director Department of Lands & Survey, Tuvalu

1 General Definitions and Numerical Standards

Call for space geodetic solutions corrected for non-tidal atmospheric loading (NT-ATML) at the observation level

Frequent epoch reference frames instead of instant station positions and constant velocities

Inventory of United Nations Resolutions on Cartography Coordination, Geographic Information and SDI 1

BUILDING AN ACCURATE GIS

Economic and Social Council

Assessment of the orbit-related sea level error budget for the TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry mission

3.6 ITRS Combination Centres

UN GGIM and National SDI Strategy

The National Spatial Reference System of the Future

Application of ECGS to host the direction of the

C o p e r n i c u s a n d W I G O S

Bengt Kjellson Chair of the Executive Committee UN-GGIM: Europe. 2 nd Joint UN-GGIM: Europe ESS Meeting 11 th March 2016, Luxembourg

Vertical Reference Frame Pacific

Meteorological instruments and observations methods: a key component of the Global Earth Observing System of Systems (GEOSS)

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Report of the Regional Committee of UN-GGIM for Asia and the Pacific (UN-GGIM-AP)

IGS Services & Other Initiatives. Chris Rizos UNSW, Australia President IAG

Country Report on SDI Activities in Singapore *

Towards an improved ILRS TRF contribution

CGMS Baseline In response to CGMS action/recommendation A45.01 HLPP reference: 1.1.8

A new best estimate for the conventional value W 0

Contribution of non-tidal oceanic mass variations to Earth rotation determined from space geodesy and ocean data

Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America

EUREF 2014 Resolutions. Z. Altamimi, C. Bruyninx, R. Dach, M. Lidberg, M. Poutanen, W. Sohne, J. Torres, M. Greaves

Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 91 (2012), REALIZATION OF ETRF2000 AS A NEW TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE FRAME IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Chris Rizos (IAG), Chair William Cartwright (ICA), immediate past Chair

FINDINGS OF THE ARCTIC METEOROLOGY SUMMIT

The Rotational and Gravitational Signature of Recent Great Earthquakes

Relationships between mass redistribution, station position, geocenter, and Earth rotation: Results from IGS GNAAC analysis

Transcription:

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Hermann Drewes Representative of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) to the Cartographic Office of the United Nations (UN) Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut, München, Germany ABSTRACT The International Association of Geodesy (IAG) installed the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) in July 2003 during the XXIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) in Sapporo, Japan, as the first and only Association Project. According to the IAG bylaws, Association Projects are of broad scope and of highest interest for the entire field of geodesy. They serve as the Association s flagship for long periods (decade or longer). The mission of GGOS is to coordinate the different geodetic observing techniques and modelling approaches, and to integrate them in a consistent ge neration of products in the three fundamental fields of geodesy: Geometry and kinematics of the Earth s surface, orientation and rotation of the Earth in space, and the gravity field of the Earth and its variability. The geodetic products shall be made visible in science, practice and society, and they shall be provided to policy makers and economists as a basis for their decisions related to, e.g., global change, natural hazard and disaster prevention. INTRODUCTION A completely new structure was established by the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) during the XXIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geo desy and Geophysics (IUGG) in Sapporo, Japan, July 2003. The basic motivation for this step was to meet the needs of the 21st century taking into account the recent changes in geodetic science. Geodetic observations have been revolutionized during the last decades by modern space techniques (in particular radio astrometry and satellite methods). The consequent globalisation of data generation, handling and processing lead to the establishment of international scientific services which evolved from the excellent cooperation of geodetic researchers around the world. These services are in general based on individual observation techniques or the generated products. They coordinate inte rnational observation programmes, guarantee the open access of data, integrate the data processing by analysis centres, and provide the results to science and society. The great success of the services in the past affected basically the geodetic science and formed a considerable part of the IAG activities. The Committee for the Realization of the New IAG Structure analysed these facts during the years 2002 to 2003 and proposed a new structure which includes scientific commissions and services at the same level. As the scientists involved in the services (table 1) separate mainly into two groups, corresponding to the fields of geometric and gravimetric methods, there had occurred some divergence of the work during the last decades. The consequences were the adoption of different conventions, use of different constants and models, and representing the results by different parameters. In this way, the geodetic (geometric and gravimetric) products were not always sufficiently consistent and could not easily be 1

combined with each other. Therefore, a centr al IAG project, the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS), was proposed in the new structure to integrate and coordinate all the activities, guarantee the consistency of products and provide them to the broad users community. The proposal was accepted by the IAG, and the IUGG strongly supported the GGOS by its Resolution No. 3 adopted during the XXIII General Assembly in Sapporo 2003. Table 1: Services of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Geometry Gravimetry Sea Level International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) International GNSS Service (IGS) International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS) International VLBI Service (IVS) International DORIS Service (IDS) International Gravity Field Service (IGFS) International Gravimetric Bureau (BGI) International Geoid Service (IGeS) International Centre f. Earth Tides (ICET) Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) Time Bureau International de Poids et Mesure Time Section (BIPM) Bibliography IAG Bibliographic Service (IBS) Directly after the Sapporo 2003 meeting an initial phase of GGOS was set up by nominating a Project Board. The first meeting of this Board took place before the EGU General Assembly, Nice, April 24, 2004. During this meeting the objectives we re revised and the first structure was installed nominating initial chairpersons. The first GGOS Workshop held in Potsdam, Germany, March 1-2, 2005, reviewed the work of the first period, adopted a modified structure and set up the action items for the next future. THE VISION OF GGOS The vision of GGOS as IAG s flagship may be highlighted as follows: GGOS integrates different geodetic techniques, different models, different approaches in order to achieve better consistency and long-term reliability of geodetic products for the understanding of geodynamic and global change processes. GGOS provides the science and infrastructure basis for all the global change research in Earth sciences. In the frame of GGOS the Earth system is viewed as a whole including the solid Earth as well as the fluid components, the static and the timevarying geometry and gravity field. GGOS is geodesy s contribution to Earth sciences by its fundamental products and discoveries. It is the bridge to the other disciplines and asserts the position of geodesy in geosciences. GGOS integrates the work of IAG and emphasizes the complementary character of the broad spectrum of geodetic research and application fields. 2

Integration of Geometric and Gravimetric Observation Techniques: VLBI GNSS SLR Satellite Altimetry Satellite Gravimetry Airborne Gravimetry Terrestrial Gravimetry Orientation and Rotation of Earth in Space Consistent and Reliable Parameter Estimation: Solid Surface Geometry and Kinematics Sea Surface and Sea Level Changes Earth Gravity Field and its Variability Geodyna mics Global Change Unique Products as a Basis for Science and Practice: Political Borders Land Management Enginee ri ng Astronaut ics Navigatio n Figure 1: The vision of GGOS as an integrating body for observations and products THE MISSION OF GGOS Following these basic ideas, the mission of GGOS may be seen twofold, the coordination within geodesy and the representation of geodesy in other sciences and in public. The internal matters are summarized by the tasks to collect, archive and ensure accessibility of geodetic observations and models; to ensure the robustness of the three fields of geodesy: geometry and kinematics, orientation and rotation, and gravity field of the Earth; to identify geodetic products and to establish the requirements concerning its accuracy, time resolution, and consistency; To stimulate close cooperation between IAG services, to identify service gaps and develop strategies to close them. If we look at the present situation in geodesy we may find some significant deficiencies with respect to the listed tasks. The robustness of the three fields of geodesy is not sufficiently exhausted due to some inconsistencies in the used models and provided products in the different areas. The requirements concerning accuracy and time resolution should be similar for all parameters. However, while we get 10-9 accuracy for the geometric parameters (surface coordinates) we are far off this level in gravimetric parameters (geoid, gravity anomalies). In geodetic services we are missing, e.g., a unified global height reference system (global vertical datum), vertical deformation models (tectonic, isostatic, loading,... ), time dependent sea level models from (satellite altimetry), free availability of terrestrial gravity data. The representation of geodesy in other sciences and in public means in particular to promote and improve the visibility of geodetic research; to achieve maximum benefit for the scientific community and for society in general. It is obvious that geodesy is not well-known in society although geodetic products (surface coordinates, Earth orientation parameters, gravity potential) are used in surveying, cadastre, engineering, global spatia l data infrastructure, rural and urban development, space-travel, navigation etc. People have to know that it s geodesy that provides the basis for these applications. Publications have to include popular literature, too, not only scientific journals. 3

To achieve more visibility and effect, data and information have to be exchanged with geosciences and other sciences in an easily understandable way. Policy makers and publicists have to be provided with the necessary information for their decisions and reports. This part of geodesy has widely been neglected in the past. THE OBJECTIVES OF GGOS The specified objectives of GGOS may be derived from the tasks mentioned in its mission: GGOS aims at maintaining the stability of time series of geometric and gravimetric reference frames; GGOS ensures the consistency between geodetic standards and conventions used in the geo-scientific community; GGOS aims at improving the geodetic models to the high level required by the modern precise observations; GGOS focuses on all aspects to ensure the consistency of geometric and gravimetric products; GGOS shall be established as an official partner in the United Nations Integrated Global Observing Strategy, IGOS, GGOS shall represent IAG in the inter-governmenta l ad hoc Group on Earth Observations, GEO. The necessity of looking seriously after the consistency of standards, models and reference frames in geodetic products may be seen from the examples given in table 2. We have several options to define and realize the parameters. As a matter of fact, there is no complete homogeneity in the use of these parameters. The origin, orientation and scale of reference frames is defined differently in geometric and gravimetric applications. Its consistency is not always proven. The models, e.g., for reducing the effects of Earth tides are not identical in geometric and gravimetric products. While the permanent effect of Sun and Moon is normally included in gravity data and models, it is reduced in geometric parameters (e.g., coordinates). This means, that the basic formula h = H + N (ellipsoidal height = orthometric height + geoid height) is not fulfilled if we take h, H from geometric and N from gravimetric results. Table 2: Examples for inconsistencies in geodetic conventions, models and reference frames Definition of origin... of orientation... of scale Models for tides... for deformation Product reference... update Geometric parameters centre of network: X 0, Y 0, Z 0 rotation axis: X P, Y P, DUT c tide free geometric only ITRF, GRS80 regularly Gravimetric parameters centre of mass: C 10, C 11, S 11 axis of inertia: C 12, S 12 GM zero tide dynamic variable episodic 4

THE SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE OF GGOS The Global Geodetic Observing System has the central theme Global deformation and mass exchange processes in the System Earth which includes all the activities of GGOS in the future: The study of all global patterns of tectonic deformation; Investigations on global patterns of all types of height changes; Deformation due to mass transfer between solid Earth, atmosphere, and hydrosphere including ice, of geodynamic as well as of anthropogenic origin; Quantification of angular momentum exchange and mass transfer. The list is not meant to be final and will be further developed. Geodesy is capable of providing information on the mass exchange between all elements (components) of the Earth s system by observing deformation of the solid Earth (geometry and kinematics) by precise positioning; water circulation in oceans, ice covers, atmosphere, solid Earth by satellite radar and laser altimetry, atmospheric sounding, terrestrial and satellite gravity measurements; mass exchange between the atmosphere, the hydrosphere and the biosphere via the angular momentum by observing variations of Earth rotation and the gravity field. ACTUAL ACTIVITIES OF GGOS The activities of GGOS within the geodetic community are done continuously by close interaction with the IAG Services. The twelve services (table 1) are cooperating more and more closely in order to overcome inconsistencies of conventions, models and parameters as well as to close gaps in service products. While the geometric services are working together intensively, there could be some improvement of cooperation within the gravimetric services and between both. For the representation of geodesy in international bodies, GGOS started some important activities during the last two years. It submitted a concept note for a Dynamic Theme within United Nations Integrated Global Observing Strategy (IGOS) and was encouraged to develop a proposal for a new theme following the IGOS-P regulations and coordinate the proposal preparation with the geo-hazard theme, the ocean theme and the wa ter cycle theme. IAG has become a participating organization in the intergovernmental ad-hoc Group on Earth Observations (GEO) and nominated the GGOS Chair as its representative to the GEO plenary. GGOS participated in the development of a 10-year implementation plan for a Global Earth Observing System of Systems (GEOSS) by working with ten members in the five corresponding subgroups. Some regional activities were also started to support GGOS: In the USA the Project Inter-Service Data Integration for Geodetic Operations (INDIGO) will enable improved performance, accuracy, and efficiency in support of NASA s Earth science and inter-national user community by developing and providing uniform access to heterogeneous space geodetic data systems; The EU project on Geodetic And Geohazard Observing Systems (GAGOS) of the European Partners in GGOS (EPIGGOS) has the main goal to identify necessary 5

adaptations of the existing infrastructure (including data management) and new deployments for the assessment of in-situ capabilities in Earth observation systems. The actual structure of GGOS was established during the first GGOS Workshop in Potsdam, Germany, 1-2 March 2005. It divides into seven Working Groups (see figure 2). Figure 2: GGOS Structure (March 2005) IAG Services, Commissions GGOS Project Board & Steering Committee Science Council WG on Strategy and Funding WG on Ground Nets and Communication WG on Missions WG on Conventions, Analysis & Modeling WG on Data and Information Systems WG on Publishing and Legal Matters WG on User Linkage and Outreach CONCLUSION There are two principal aspects in the mission of GGOS: 1. Internally to guarantee the reliability of geodetic products by ensuring the consistency of conventions, models, parameters, and reference systems used in the three fields of geodesy: Earth geometry, Earth orientation, and Earth gravity field. 2. Externally to promote and improve the visibility of geodetic research and results, to represent geodesy in international bodies, and to achieve maximum benefit for the scientific community and for society in general by providing data and products. 6