ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

Similar documents
PAPER 51 ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

For QFFF MSc Students Monday, 9th January 2017: 14:00 to 16:00. Marks shown on this paper are indicative of those the Examiners anticipate assigning.

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

QFT PS7: Interacting Quantum Field Theory: λφ 4 (30/11/17) The full propagator in λφ 4 theory. Consider a theory of a real scalar field φ

2P + E = 3V 3 + 4V 4 (S.2) D = 4 E

Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)

Path Integrals in Quantum Field Theory C6, HT 2014

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

PAPER 44 ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

Imperial College London BSc/MSci EXAMINATION May 2008 THERMODYNAMICS & STATISTICAL PHYSICS

Coherent-state path integrals. The coherent states are complete (indeed supercomplete) and provide for the identity operator the expression

Physics 582, Problem Set 4 Solutions

PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 2017/2018

Finite Temperature Field Theory

Imperial College London BSc/MSci EXAMINATION May 2014

DR.RUPNATHJI( DR.RUPAK NATH )

Finite-temperature Field Theory

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Quantum Field Theory II

4 4 and perturbation theory

PHY 396 L. Solutions for homework set #20.

1 Path Integral Quantization of Gauge Theory

MATHS & STATISTICS OF MEASUREMENT

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

The boundary state from open string fields. Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba. March 9, 2009 at Nagoya

BLACK HOLES (ADVANCED GENERAL RELATIV- ITY)

Lecture-05 Perturbation Theory and Feynman Diagrams

Path Integral for Spin

10 Thermal field theory

Concistency of Massive Gravity LAVINIA HEISENBERG

Warming Up to Finite-Temperature Field Theory

L = 1 2 µφ µ φ m2 2 φ2 λ 0

Renormalization of the Yukawa Theory Physics 230A (Spring 2007), Hitoshi Murayama

Schwinger-Dyson Equation(s)

Solution to sunset diagram problem

Euclidean path integral formalism: from quantum mechanics to quantum field theory

Self-consistent Conserving Approximations and Renormalization in Quantum Field Theory at Finite Temperature

QFT Perturbation Theory

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

The Quantum Theory of Finite-Temperature Fields: An Introduction. Florian Divotgey. Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

BRST renormalization

Higgs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Regularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Heisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians

The Path Integral: Basics and Tricks (largely from Zee)

STOCHASTIC QUANTIZATION AND HOLOGRAPHY

QCD on the lattice - an introduction

1 Running and matching of the QED coupling constant

QFT at finite Temperature

Write your CANDIDATE NUMBER clearly on each of the THREE answer books provided. Hand in THREE answer books even if they have not all been used.

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

QED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014

QFT Perturbation Theory

Functional Quantization

Physics 444: Quantum Field Theory 2. Homework 2.

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Analytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations

STRUCTURE OF MATTER, VIBRATIONS AND WAVES, AND QUANTUM PHYSICS

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

Unitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules

We would like to give a Lagrangian formulation of electrodynamics.

Vector Fields. It is standard to define F µν = µ ϕ ν ν ϕ µ, so that the action may be written compactly as

Dilaton: Saving Conformal Symmetry

2.3 Calculus of variations

Solutions to Problems in Peskin and Schroeder, An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory. Chapter 9

Finite temperature QFT: A dual path integral representation

Beta functions in quantum electrodynamics

String Theory I GEORGE SIOPSIS AND STUDENTS

Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory C6, MT 2017

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Interface Profiles in Field Theory

Lagrangian. µ = 0 0 E x E y E z 1 E x 0 B z B y 2 E y B z 0 B x 3 E z B y B x 0. field tensor. ν =

Advanced Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 1

Loop Corrections: Radiative Corrections, Renormalization and All

Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51

11 Symmetries and symmetry breaking

CALCULATING TRANSITION AMPLITUDES FROM FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS

STRUCTURE OF MATTER, VIBRATIONS & WAVES and QUANTUM PHYSICS

What is a particle? Keith Fratus. July 17, 2012 UCSB

Quantization of Scalar Field

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

Spacetime foam and modified dispersion relations

Green Functions in Many Body Quantum Mechanics

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II

Solution set #7 Physics 571 Tuesday 3/17/2014. p 1. p 2. Figure 1: Muon production (e + e µ + µ ) γ ν /p 2

Week 1, solution to exercise 2

Introduction to Renormalization Group

Continuous Symmetries and Conservation Laws. Noether s Theorem

ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Exercises. Adel Bilal

A Brief Introduction to Linear Response Theory with Examples in Electromagnetic Response

Transcription:

Imperial College London MSc EXAMINATION May 2016 This paper is also taken for the relevant Examination for the Associateship ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY For Students in Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces Friday, 6th May 2016: 14:00 to 17:00 Answer THREE out of the following FOUR questions. Marks shown on this paper are indicative of those the Examiners anticipate assigning. General Instructions Complete the front cover of each of the THREE answer books provided. If an electronic calculator is used, write its serial number at the top of the front cover of each answer book. USE ONE ANSWER BOOK FOR EACH QUESTION. Enter the number of each question attempted in the box on the front cover of its corresponding answer book. Hand in THREE answer books even if they have not all been used. You are reminded that Examiners attach great importance to legibility, accuracy and clarity of expression. c Imperial College London 2016 1 Go to the next page for questions

You may use the following results without proof: Chain rule for functional differentiation: δf (x) δb(y) = d 4 z δf (x) δa(z) δa(z) δb(y). Minkowski-space loop integral in d = 4 ɛ dimensions: I n (m 2 ) := µ ɛ d d p 1 (2π) d (p 2 m 2 + iɛ ) n = ( 1) n iµɛ m d 2n Γ(n 1 2 d), (4π) d/2 Γ(n) where Γ(z + 1) = zγ(z), such that Γ(m) = (m 1)! if m is a positive integer and Γ(δ) = δ 1 γ + O(δ), Γ( 1 + δ) = (δ 1 + 1 γ) + O(δ), for small δ where γ = 0.577216... is the Euler Mascheroni constant. Gaussian path integrals: real: Grassmannian: Dφ e 1 2 d d x d d y φ(x)m(x,y)φ(y) = const. det M, Dθ Dθ e d d x d d y θ (x)m(x,y)θ(y) = det M 2 Go to the next page for questions

1. Consider a particle with action tb S[q; t a, t b ] = dt [ 1 2 m q2 V (q) ] t a Let q, t be the eigenstate of the position operator ˆq(t) q; t = q q; t at time t. The amplitude for the particle to evolve from position q a at time t a to position q b at time t b is given by the path integral U(q a, q b ; t b t a ) := q b ; t b q a ; t a = q(tb )=q b q(t a)=q a Dq e is[q:ta,t b]/. (i) Discuss briefly the physical interpretation of this path integral. In the limit 0, which paths q(t) in the integral give the largest contribution to the amplitude? Why? By inserting factors of 1 = dq q, t q, t, show that q b ; t b ˆq(t) q a ; t a = dq U(q, q b ; t b t) qu(q a, q; t t a ) = q(tb )=q b q(t a)=q a Dq q(t)e is[q;ta,t b]/. Hence argue that in general one gets the time-ordered expression q(tb )=q b q(t a)=q a Dq q(t 1 ) q(t n ) e is[q;ta,t b]/ = q b ; t b T ˆq(t 1 ) ˆq(t n ) q a ; t a. lim T (1 iɛ) [7 marks] (ii) Setting = 1 and given q; t = e iĥt q where Ĥ is the Hamiltonian, show that lim T (1 iɛ) q; T Ω where Ω is the ground state. Hence show that Dq q(t1 ) q(t n ) e is[q; T,T ] Ω T ˆq(t 1 ) ˆq(t n ) Ω =. Dq e is[q; T,T ] (iii) The generating functional is given by Z[J] = lim T (1 iɛ) Dq e is[q]+i dt q(t)j(t). [6 marks] By considering a change of integration variables in Z[J] from q(t) to q (t) = q(t) + α(t) for arbitrary, small α(t), show that ( ) δs[q] dt α(t) lim Dq T (1 iɛ) δq(t) + J(t) e is[q]+i dt q(t)j(t) = 0. (You may assume Dq = Dq.) (iv) Hence show that m d2 dt Ω T dv (t) 2 ˆq(t)ˆq(t ) Ω + Ω T dq ˆq(t ) Ω = iδ(t t ). [3 marks] [Total 20 marks] 3 Please go to the next page

2. The generating functionals Z[J], E[J] and Γ[φ cl ] for a scalar theory are related by i ln Z[J] = E[J] = Γ[φ cl ] d 4 xφ cl (x)j(x), where φ cl (x) = δe[j]/δj(x), and the corresponding correlation functions are given by G n (x 1,..., x n ) = ( i)n δ n Z[J] Z[0] δj(x 1 ) δj(x n ), J=0 G n (x 1,..., x n ) = ( i) n+1 δ n E[J] δj(x 1 ) δj(x n ), J=0 δ n Γ[φ cl ] Γ n (x 1,..., x n ) = i. δφ cl (x 1 ) δφ cl (x n ) φcl =0 (i) In a perturbation expansion, what kind of Feynman diagrams contribute to G n? What about G n and Γ n? Consider λφ 4 theory. Argue that G 2 (x 1, x 2 ) = G 2 (x 1, x 2 ) and draw the tree-level and one-loop Feynman diagrams that contribute to the functions G 4, G 4 and Γ 4. [6 marks] (ii) If A is a constant, the effective potential V eff (A) is defined by Γ[φ cl ] φcl =A = d 4 x V eff (A). Ignoring terms independent of A, show that 1 V eff (A) = i n! An Γn (0,..., 0), n=1 where the Fourier transform of Γ n (x 1,..., x n ) is (2π) 4 δ (4) ( i p i) Γ n (p 1,..., p n ). (iii) Draw the Feynman diagrams that give the one-loop contribution to V eff (A) in λφ 4 theory. Using the standard Feynman rules show that ( ) V 1-loop i d 4 n p λ 0 eff (A) = 2 n+1 n (2π) 4 p 2 m 2 n=1 0 + A 2n, iɛ ( = 1 2 i d 4 p p 2 (2π) log m0 2 1 2 λ 0A 2 + iɛ ) 4 p 2 m0 2 + iɛ (You do not have justify the symmetry factors.) Which terms in the power series expression are divergent? (iv) Show that, using dimensional regularisation, V 1-loop eff = λ [ ( ) 0 ( m 2 A 2 64π 2 0 + 1 2 λ 0A 2) 2 ɛ + log 4πµ 2 m0 2 + 1 2 λ 0A 2 ] γ + 1. [Total 20 marks] 4 Please go to the next page

3. The action for electromagnetism is S[A µ ] = 1 4 d 4 x F µν F µν where F µν = µ A ν ν A µ. It is invariant under gauge transformations A µ A (α) µ = A µ + 1 e µα. (i) Show that in momentum space S[à µ ] = 1 2 i d 4 p d 4 q (2π) 4 (2π) 4 à µ(p) M µν (p, q)ã ν (q), where M µν (p, q) = i(2π) 4 δ (4) (p q) (p 2 η µν p µ p ν ) and à µ (p) = à µ( p) is the Fourier transform of A µ (x). Show that M µν (p, q) is not invertible and hence argue that the standard procedure for defining the propagator 0 T A µ (x)a ν (y) 0 fails. (ii) Let G[A µ ](x) = w(x) be some (local) gauge-fixing condition. By inserting ( ) δg[a µ (α) ] 1 = Dα det δ(g[a µ (α) ] w) δα show that the partition function of A µ (x) can be written as ( ) Z[J µ δg[a µ (α) ] ] = DA µ det e is ξ[a µ]+i d 4 xj µ (x)a µ(x), δα where S ξ [A µ ] = S[A µ ] 1 2ξ d 4 x G[A µ ] 2 for some constant ξ. Do you expect correlation functions of A µ to depend on G[A µ ] and ξ? What about correlation functions of F µν? (iii) Locality implies that δg[a µ (α) ](x)/δα(y) = δ (4) (x y) (x) for some operator (x). Show that Z[J µ ] can be rewritten as Z[J µ ] = DA µ Dc Dc e is[aµ,c,c ]+i d 4 xj µ (x)a µ(x) where S[A µ, c, c ] = S ξ [A µ ] d 4 x c c. What are the properties of the new fields c(x) and c (x)? What type of particle do they describe? [3 marks] (iv) Show that Z[J µ ] DA µ Dc Dc DB e is[aµ,c,c,b]+i d 4 xj µ (x)a µ(x) where S[A µ, c, c, B] = d 4 x ( 1 4 F µνf µν c c + 1 2 ξb2 + BG[A µ ] ). What are the properties of the new field B(x)? [3 marks] 5 [This question continues on the next page... ]

(v) Take G[A µ ] = µ A µ and show that S[A µ, c, c, B] is invariant under the infinitesimal BRST transformations, parameterised by a constant Grassmannian variable ɛ, δ ɛ A µ = 1 e ɛ µc, δ ɛ c = 0, δ ɛ c = ɛb, δ ɛ B = 0. Defining an operator Q such that acting on fields ɛq A µ = δ ɛ A µ, and ɛq c = δ ɛ c etc., show that Q 2 = 0. Outline how the physical states of the theory are defined using Q. [Total 20 marks] 6 Please go to the next page

4. The Lagrangian density for λφ 4 theory is given by L = 1 2 µφ µ φ 1 2 m2 0φ 2 1 4! λ 0φ 4. (i) In renormalised perturbation theory one defines φ = Z 1/2 φ R, Zm 2 0 = m 2 R + δm 2, Z 2 λ 0 = λ R + δλ, where Z = 1+δZ. Rewrite the Lagrangian density in terms of the renormalised field, renormalised couplings, and counter terms. [2 marks] (ii) Let G2 R (x, y) = Ω T φ R (x)φ R (y) Ω be the renormalised two-point function. Using the standard Feynman rules, show that the Fourier transform can be written as ( ) k G 2 R (p, q) = (2π) 4 δ (4) i i Γ 2 (p) (p + q) p 2 mr 2 + iɛ p 2 mr 2 + iɛ k=0 = (2π) 4 δ (4) i (p + q) p 2 mr 2 i Γ 2 (p) + iɛ where Γ 2 (p) is the one-particle irreducible (1PI) two-point function. (iii) By considering one-loop and counter-term diagrams, show that Γ 2 (p) = 1 2 λ RI 1 (m 2 R) + i ( p 2 δz δm 2) + O(λ 2 R). (where I 1 (m 2 ) is defined on page 2). Hence show that in the MS scheme δz = 0 + O(λ 2 R) δm 2 = λ ( ) RmR 2 2 4πµ2 + log γ + O(λ 2 32π 2 ɛ M R). 2 (iv) Now consider the renormalised four-point vertex function Γ R 4 (p 1, p 2, p 3, p 4 ). By considering one-loop and counter-term diagrams, show that Γ R 4 (0, 0, 0, 0) = iλ R + 3 2 λ2 RI 2 (m 2 R) iδλ + O(λ 3 R). (where I 2 (m 2 ) is defined on page 2). Hence show that in the MS scheme ( ) δλ = 3λ2 R 2 4πµ2 + log γ + O(λ 3 32π 2 ɛ M R). 2 (v) Using the relation between bare and renormalised quantities given in part (i), show that γ 2 = (M/m 2 R )( m2 R / M) and β = M( λ R/ M) are given by γ 2 = M m 2 R δm 2 R M = λ R 16π 2 + O(λ2 R), β = M δλ M = 3λ2 R 16π 2 + O(λ3 R), 7 [This question continues on the next page... ]

where the derivatives are defined holding the bare quantities fixed. Hence argue that λ R is a marginally irrelevant coupling. These equations also imply that the mass mr 2 is a marginal coupling. Is this correct? Would we have found the same result if we had used a simple cut-off to regulate the theory? [Total 20 marks] 8 End of examination paper