Abstract. 1. Introduction

Similar documents
The Search for >35 MeV Neutrons from the June 3, 2012 Impulsive Flare

Angular Distribution of Solar Gamma Rays and Solar Neutrons Simulated by GEANT4 Program

Observation of solar high energy gamma and X-ray emission and solar energetic particles

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY: IMAGING ATMOSPHERIC CHERENKOV TECHNIQUE FABIO ZANDANEL - SESIONES CCD

Study of Performance Improvement for Air Shower Array with Surface Water Cherenkov Detectors

Measurement by FIB on the ISS: two emissions of Solar Neutrons detected?

The Sun and the Solar System in Gamma Rays

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

GRAINE Project: a balloon-borne emulsion gamma-ray telescope

Very High-Energy Gamma- Ray Astrophysics

COSMIC RAYS DAY INTRODUCTION TO COSMIC RAYS WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE - SEPTEMBER 26, 2015 VERONICA BINDI - UNIVERSITY OH HAWAII

On the possibility to forecast severe radiation storms by data from surface and space-born facilities

Recent Results from CANGAROO

PoS(ICRC2015)430. Shower reconstruction performance of the new Tibet hybrid experiment consisting of YAC-II, Tibet-III and MD arrays

Parameters Sensitive to the Mass Composition of Cosmic Rays and Their Application at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Study of Solar Gamma Rays basing on Geant4 code

PoS(ICRC2015)432. Simulation Study On High Energy Electron and Gamma-ray Detection With the Newly Upgraded Tibet ASgamma Experiment

Primary cosmic ray mass composition above 1 PeV as measured by the PRISMA-YBJ array

Space Application of Geant4 for the Japanese X-ray X Gamma-ray Mission

Large Solar Flares. Albert Y. Shih NASA/GSFC 2014 Oct 21

Dark Matter Particle Explorer: The First Chinese Cosmic Ray and Hard γ-ray Detector in Space

H. Koshiishi, H. Matsumoto, A. Chishiki, T. Goka, and T. Omodaka. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Solar Neutron and Gamma-ray Monitor for a Small Satellite

RECENT RESULTS FROM CANGAROO

High energy particles from the Sun. Arto Sandroos Sun-Earth connections

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 2 Jul 2009

John Ellison University of California, Riverside. Quarknet 2008 at UCR

PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH SCINTILLATION COUNTER

Search for GeV neutrinos associated with solar flares with IceCube

Science of Compact X-Ray and Gamma-ray Objects: MAXI and GLAST

1. GAMMA-RAY BURSTS & 2. FAST RADIO BURSTS

Forbush event detected by CARPET on 2012 March

Longitudinal profile of Nµ/Ne in extensive air showers: Implications for cosmic rays mass composition study

Time-domain astronomy with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor

Observation of sub-tev gamma-rays from RX J with the CANGAROO-II telescope

Water Cherenkov Detector installation by the Vertical Muon Equivalent technique

Observing TeV Gamma Rays from the Jet Interaction Regions of SS 433 with HAWC

PoS(ICRC2015)641. Cloud Monitoring using Nitrogen Laser for LHAASO Experiment. Z.D. Sun 1,Y. Zhang 2,F.R. Zhu 1 for the LHAASO Collaboration

Downward Terrestrial Gamma Flashes Observed at the Telescope Array Surface Detector

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2011

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

PoS(ICRC2015)424. YAC sensitivity for measuring the light-component spectrum of primary cosmic rays at the knee energies

The overview and current status of the ALPACA experiment

Solar Gamma-Ray Line Spectroscopy Physics of a Flaring Star

Multi-wavelength VLA and Spacecraft Observations of Evolving Coronal Structures Outside Flares

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 30 Jul 2008

Thin Calorimetry for Cosmic-Ray Studies Outside the Earth s Atmosphere. 1 Introduction

November 2013 analysis of high energy electrons on the Japan Experimental Module (JEM: Kibo)

Measurements of solar diurnal anisotropy with GRAPES-3 experiment

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

Gamma-ray Astrophysics

High energy resolution GeV gamma ray detector Satoko Osone Funabashi, Chiba, , JAPAN

Status and Perspectives of the LAGO Project

Latest news from the High Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory

Simulation of the charging process of the LISA test masses due to solar particles.

The LHCf experiment at LHC

The KASCADE-Grande Experiment

X-ray observations of Solar Flares. Marina Battaglia Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz (FHNW)

The Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon

1. Motivation & Detector concept 2. Performance 3. Confirmation experiments 4. Summary

Indirect Dark Matter Detection

Experiment of the 30 cm-cube ETCC under the Intense Radiations with Proton Beam

Microwave and hard X-ray imaging observations of energetic electrons in solar flares: event of 2003 June 17

Zero degree neutron energy spectra measured by LHCf at s = 13 TeV proton-proton collision

HAWC and the cosmic ray quest

Gammaray burst spectral evolution in the internal shock model: comparison with the observations

Effect of Solar Flare X-Rays on digisonde fmin values. S. C. Tripathi H. Haralambous

Relationship between plasma temperature and HXR intensity from INTEGRAL

Neutrino induced muons

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

A New View of the High-Energy γ-ray Sky with the Fermi Telescope

TRACE DOWNFLOWS AND ENERGY RELEASE

Downflow as a Reconnection Outflow

GRAINE balloon-borne experiment in 2015 : Observations with a high angular resolution gamma-ray telescope

Measurement of the CR e+/e- ratio with ground-based instruments

Development of faster front end electronics for the SciCRT detector at Sierra Negra, Mexico

Publications of Francesco Arneodo: journal articles

Neutron pulse height analysis (R405n)

Astroparticle Physics with IceCube

From the Knee to the toes: The challenge of cosmic-ray composition

Gamma Ray Physics in the Fermi era. F.Longo University of Trieste and INFN

The H.E.S.S. Standard Analysis Technique

TeV Gamma Rays from Synchrotron X-ray X

Development of a Hard X-Ray Polarimeter for Solar Flares and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Milagro A TeV Observatory for Gamma Ray Bursts

RHESSI and AIA observations of the FERMI behind-the-limb flare on 2014 September 1

Timing calibration of the LHAASO-KM2A electromagnetic particle detectors

Status and Perspectives of the LAGO Project

The LHCf experiment at LHC

Studies of Hadron Calorimeter

Cosmic Rays. This showed that the energy of cosmic rays was many times that of any other natural or artificial radiation known at that time.

EBL Studies with the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

High Energy Emission. Brenda Dingus, LANL HAWC

The Silicon-Tungsten Tracker of the DAMPE Mission

1. Motivation & Detector concept 2. Performance 3. Applications 4. Summary

PoS(ICRC2017)775. The performance of DAMPE for γ-ray detection

Calibration of large water-cherenkov Detector at the Sierra Negra site of LAGO

A generalized approach to model the spectra and radiation dose rate of solar particle events on the surface of Mars

Transcription:

Analysis of solar gamma rays and solar neutrons detected on March 7 th and September 25 th of 2011 by Ground Level Neutron Telescopes, SEDA-FIB and FERMI-LAT Y. Muraki 1), J. F. Valdés-Galicia 2), L. X. González 2), K. Kamiya 3), Y. Katayose 4), K. Koga 3), H. Matsumoto 3), S. Masuda 1), Y. Matsubara 1), Y. Nagai 1), M. Ohnishi 5), S. Ozawa 6), T. Sako 1), S. Shibata 7), M. Takita 5), Y. Tanaka 8), H. Tsuchiya 9), K. Watanabe 10), and J. L. Zhang 11) 1) ISEE, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan 2) Instituto de Geofisica, UNAM, 04510, Mexico D.F., Mexico 3) Tsukuba Space center, JAXA, Tsukuba 305-8505, Japan 4) Physics department, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan 5) Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8582, Japan 6) Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan 7) Engineering Science Laboratory, Chubu University, Kasugai 487-0027, Japan 8) Department of Physics, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan 9) Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan 10) National Defense Academy, Yokosuka 239-8686, Japan 11) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 100049, China Abstract At the 33 rd ICRC, we reported the possible detection of solar gamma rays by a ground level detector and later re-examined this event. On March 7, 2011, the solar neutron telescope (SNT) located at Mt. Sierra Negra, Mexico (4,600 m) observed enhancements of the counting rate from19:49 to 20:02 UT and from 20:50 to 21:01 UT. The statistical significance was 9.7σ and 8.5σ, respectively. This paper discusses the possibility of using this mountain detector to detect solar gamma rays. In association with this event, the solar neutron detector SEDA-FIB onboard the International Space Station has also detected solar neutrons with a statistical significance of 7.5σ. The FERMI-LAT detector also observed high-energy gamma rays from this flare with a statistical significance of 6.7σ. We thus attempted to make a unified model to explain this data. In this paper, we report on another candidate for solar gamma rays detected on September 25 th, 2011 by the SNT located in Tibet (4,300 m) from 04:37 to 04:47 UT with a statistical significance of 8.0σ (by the Li-Ma method). 1. Introduction The solar flare observed at 19:48 UT on March 7, 2011 may be one of the most important flares observed in Solar Cycle 24. Although the intensity of the flare measured by the GOES satellite was moderate, M3.7, the event has already provided us with much important information. From this information, we were able to point out an emission of long-lasting, high-energy gamma rays detected by the FERMI-LAT satellite. This emission continued for almost 14 hours and high-energy gamma rays with an energy of 1

~4GeV were recorded. [1] Another relevant fact is that this marked the first detection of solar neutrons in Solar Cycle 24 using the solar neutron telescope (SEDA-FIB) onboard the International Space Station (ISS). [2] Complementary to these observations, a solar neutron telescope (SNT) located at Mt. Sierra Negra in Mexico registered two enhancements of the counting rate during the flare. [3] The Mt. Sierra Negra observatory is located at an altitude of 4,600m a.s.l. In this paper, we will discuss whether these observation results may be explained by a unified model. This paper is organized as follows: The next section introduces the data observed by the referred instruments. Sections 3 and 4 describe our interpretations that could explain the data consistently. In section 5, we summarize the results. 2. Observation Data Here we present the space environment data obtained from around 19:30 to 21:00 UT on March 7, 2011. Data were obtained using five different satellites and one groundbased detector: GOES, RHESSI, FERMI-GBM, [4] FERMI-LAT, [5] and SEDA-FIB, as well as the SDO and SNT at Mt. Sierra Negra, Mexico. Figure 1 presents the time lines of the different data. 1. GOES data The soft X-ray sensors on the GOES satellite detected a flare that started at 19:43 UT and reached its maximum at 20:12 UT with magnitude M3.7. The flare position was identified at about N23W50 on the solar surface in Active Region 11164. 2. RHESSI satellite The RESSHI satellite also observed this flare from 19:27 to 20:08 UT. The emission of hard X-rays with 25-300 kev started at ~19:47 UT and peaked at 20:00 UT. Two-dimensional plots are made for the times of maxima at 19:57 UT and 20:01 UT using the hard X-ray data of the RHESSI satellite. The peak positions of hard X-rays and soft gamma rays are estimated using the RHESSI data at the solar coordinates of (625, 560 ) for 19:57 UT and (610, 560 ) for 20:01 UT, respectively. Figure 2 presents the plots. 3. FERMI-GBM results The FERMI satellite involves two main detectors (GBM and LAT). The GBM monitors gamma-ray bursts in the range of X-rays between 6 and 300 kev. [6] The FERMI-GBM detector observed the Sun from 20:02 to 20:40 UT on March 7, 2011. The intensity of 2

hard X-rays in the range of 100-300 kev was 2,000 counts per second at 20:02 UT, the data profile shows that the maximum was shortly before observation started; in the second peak at 20:38 UT, a counting rate of ~800 counts per seconds was recorded. Unfortunately, the detectors failed to observe the rising phase of the first impulsive flare. When comparing the time profile of the GBM with that of GOES, however, a clear difference can be recognized. The observation using soft X-rays only showed only peak bump, in contrast, the observation using hard X-rays clearly showed a second peak at ~20:38 UT. [6] 4. FERMI-LAT results The high-energy gamma-ray detector FERMI-LAT observed the flare from 20:15 to 20:40 UT. High-energy gamma rays with a peak intensity at 200 MeV were detected. The highest gamma rays reached Eγ~4 GeV. The emission of gamma rays continued for 14 hours, the details of which have been published. [1] The FERMI-LAT detector failed to detect the impulsive phase of the flare. 5. SEDA-FIB results on the ISS The SEDA-AP is a neutron sensor onboard the ISS. The sensor can measure the energy and arrival direction of neutrons. Details may be found in the references. [7-10] The production time may be estimated using information on the energy of neutroninduced protons in the sensor. Figure 3 shows the energy spectra of solar neutrons. The spectra are reduced assuming an instantaneous production of those neutrons. The most probable production time of neutrons is estimated to be around 19:58 UT for the first peak and 20:37 UT for the second peak. The SEDA-FIB also failed to detect the impulsive phase of the first peak. This is because the ISS passed over the night area of the Earth until 20:02 UT. 6. SDO satellite The Solar Dynamics Observatory observes the Sun by means of ultra-violet telescopes over different wavelengths. The SDO satellite successfully observed the emission of a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) associated with this flare from the start time of emissions. Thus, the satellite not only observed the start of the CME but also its development from the start time of an impulsive flare at ~19:47 UT. [11] Figure 4 shows several images taken at 19:48 UT, 20:02UT, 20:37 UT, and 20:50 UT by the 30.4-nm SDO/AIA telescope. The 30.4nm line emission is produced by the helium ions. The intensive emission area of hard X-rays determined by the RHESSI 3

observation is circled in the image. 19:47 UT corresponds to the start time of the magnetic loop forming the CME, while 20:50 UT corresponds to the peak time of the counting rate detected by the SNT at Mt. Sierra Negra. Thus, 19:58 UT and 20:37 UT are the estimated solar neutron production times. Figure 5 shows the SDO/AIA images at 19:47 UT, 19:58 UT, and 20:38 UT at other wavelengths. 7. Solar Neutron Telescope at Mt. Sierra Negra Figure 6 shows the time profile of the L1 channel between 19:00 and 21:30 UT as observed by the SNT at Sierra Negra (SN-SNT). The SNT consists of plastic scintillators surrounded by proportional counters (PC) in anticoincidence, to separate the flux of neutral particles from charged particles. The L1 channel measures the flux of neutral particles (n or gamma) crossing the scintillator and triggering the PC underneath [12]. Two clear enhancements from 19:49 to 20:02UT and from 20:50 to 21:01UT may be recognized. Figure 7 shows the time profile of the neutron channel, N1, that is the flux of neutral particles measured at the scintillator. The N1/L1 was 0.16~0.40, depending on the counting rate of the N1 channel. The ratio sharply contrasts from the solar neutron event observed on September 7, 2005 using the same detector [13]. The ratio was ~7 for the event of September 7, 2005. 8. Solar Neutron Telescope at Tibet We found a similar event in the data obtained by the SNT [14] located in Tibet (4,300 m a.s.l.) on September 25th, 2011, following the M7.4 flare at 04:33 UT. Figure 8 shows the time profile of L3 channel between 04:00 and 07:00UT. In comparison with the neutron channel, N1, En >40MeV (Figure 9), a clear enhancement is recognized. The statistical significance is 8.0σ by the Li-Ma method. Figure 10 presents the time profile of the neutron monitor located in Tibet at the same time. Under the scintillator of the SNT in Tibet, between the Layer 1 and 3, a 10cm thick wood plate is installed for the selection of high energy neutrons. The wood plate absorbs low energy protons induced by low energy neutrons. The density of the wood plate is about 1.0 gr/cm 3. This facility was not added to the SNT at Mt. Sierra Negra. According to the Monte Carlo calculation based on the GEANT 3 program [15], the detection efficiencies of solar neutrons and solar gamma rays of N1, L1 and L3 channels are 0.2, 0.07, 0.0001 for neutrons, and 0.3, 0.1, 0.01 for gamma rays respectively. These numbers are given for incident neutral particles with an energy of 150MeV. Thus the L1 and L3 channels have an excellent ability to discriminate between neutrons and 4

gamma rays. We also plot the time profile of the counting rate of one minute value of the L1 channel of Tibet SNT at the same time in Figure 11. Figure 12 plots the L3/N1 ratio. Except around 4.63UT (or 04:38UT), L3 and N1 data variated similarly. Figure 13 shows the energy spectrum of solar neutrons assuming instantaneous production at 04:45:00 UT. It seems that has two components, forming the low energy bump and the high energy tail. The assumption that these neutrons were produced at the same time maybe does not correctly reflect the case of this flare. In Figure 14, we present images of the solar surface around the maximum time of the flare taken by the SDO/AIA UV telescope. The image indicates two bright spots. Therefore, the gross feature of the flare observed by the X-rays may be explained by the superposition of the two independent flares that developed with slight different time lag. The long lasting flare beyond 20 minutes may reflect this circumstance and the energy spectrum of Figure 12 may be described by this assumption. 3. Comparison of Observed Intensities between SEDA and SNT At the time of the flare on March 7, 2011, the SNT at Mt. Sierra Negra (SN-SNT) and the SEDA-FIB recorded two enhancements. [15] This raises the question of whether both enhancements were produced in association with the M3.7 flare. The enhancements recorded by the SNT were observed by the L1 channel that consists of proportional counters located just under the scintillators. Except for a minor, non-significant, enhancement of the anti-counter, a positive signal of neutrons was not recorded. A similar trend can be recognized in the data observed at Tibet for the 25 September 2011 event. Therefore, these enhancements recorded by the SNTs must have been produced by gamma rays. In such case, we have estimated the intensity of gamma rays that entered the top of the atmosphere. The counting rate of the L1 channel at Mt. Sierra Negra was estimated as 152 counts/m 2 /min. and 145 counts/m 2 /min. for the first and second peaks, respectively. Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were used to estimate the incident flux at the top of the atmosphere. According to the MC calculation, the attenuation is estimated as 0.1 for photons with energy of E = 1 GeV, 0.01 for photons of 200MeV, 0.003 for 100MeV, and 0.001 for photons with energy of 30 MeV. Here we take the attenuation factor as 0.001. Then the flux at the top of the atmosphere is estimated to be 150,000 counts/m 2 /min. The flux of solar neutrons with En > 30 MeV is conversely estimated as follows: From Fig. 3 (left), the number of neutrons after decay correction is estimated as 149 5

counts/100 cm 2 or 14,900/m 2. Given the SEDA-FIB sensor s efficiency in detecting neutrons (estimated at 2%), the net value at the top of the atmosphere after decay correction turns out to be 7.5 10 5 counts/m 2. If these neutrons were emitted during seven minutes, the intensive gamma ray emission time, we could compare both values. Then we would find that both are of the same order at a ratio of about 0.71 (= neutrons/gamma rays). We have checked these values obtained by the recent MC calculation based on GEANT 4 [16]. Using the MC calculation to estimate the flux in the direction toward the Earth, we assumed an opening angle of 57 degrees between the vertical direction and the direction toward the Earth. The MC calculation predicts the ratio to be 0.7 at En or γ> 30 MeV in case the accelerated protons have the power index of -4.0. Although the SEDA did not observe the impulsive phase, it could measure neutrons produced during the impulsive phase, as the arrival time of neutrons near the Earth is expected to be 7-20 minutes later than that of the photons. By comparing the energy spectrum of the first peak at 19:58 UT (Fig. 3, left) with the spectrum of the second peak at 20:37UT (Figure 3, right), the latter seems to have a harder spectrum. Figure 1. The event time profile of each detector as a function of universal time during 19:30 21:30 UT on March 7, 2011. The full star mark denotes the peak times of hard X-rays. The open star ( ) represents the peak that respective detector failed to see. 6

Figure 2. Density maps of X-rays observed by the RHESSI satellite at (a) 19:57-19:58 UT and (b) 20:01 20:02 UT. The red contours represent the intensity of hard X- rays with 20 50 kev; the green contours correspond to X-rays with energy of 50 100 kev. 100 Number of Events 10 19:58 UT obs prod 1 10 100 1000 10000 Enegy [MeV] 100 Number of Events 10 20:37 UT obs prod 1 10 100 1000 10000 Enegy [MeV] Figure 3. Energy spectra of solar neutrons for the 1 st bump and 2 nd bump on SEDA=NEM detector. Here we assume that neutrons were produced instantaneously at 19:58 UT and 20:37 UT when soft gamma rays of 100-300 kev showed maximum intensity. The blue diamond shows the raw data, while the red square represents the corrected data of the decay effect in flight between the Sun and the Earth. 7

Figure 4. Images of the solar surface around AR1164 taken by the SDO/AIA telescopes at a wavelength of 30.4 nm (clockwise) at 19:48 UT, 20:02 UT, 20:37 UT, and 20:50 UT. The circle indicates the region where the most intensive hard X- rays were observed by the RHESSI satellite. 8

Figure 5. Images of the solar surface taken by the SDO/AIA telescopes with a wavelength of 13.1 nm at 19:43 UT (top-left), 9.4 nm at 19:47:26 UT (top-right), 17.1 nm at 19:58:24 UT (bottomleft), and 13.1 nm at 20:50 UT (bottom-right). At 19:58:24 UT, a flash can be recognized at 625 and 555 (the right arrow). Those hot particles may be transferred into the foot point of the CME at 595 and 560 (indicated by the left arrow), and then become seed particles for high-energy accelerated protons possibly located inside the shock of the CME (not in the figure). Chen et al. estimated the start time of the CME at 19:43 UT [11]. 9

4. Comparison of Observed Intensities between SNT and FERMI-LAT Let us compare the counting rate observed by the FERMI-LAT detector with the counting rate observed by the Sierra Negra SNT. The gamma-ray flux near the Earth measured by the FERMI-LAT around 20:15 UT is estimated as ~57 counts/m 2 /min. for Eγ > 100 MeV. [1] In contrast, the gamma-ray flux of Eγ > 30 MeV estimated from the counting rate measured using the SNT is 150,000 counts/m 2 /min. The flux of gamma rays estimated from SNT observation is about 2,500 times higher than that estimated from FERMI-LAT observation. One reason arises from the difference of the energy threshold (Eγ > 100 MeV and > 30MeV). Another reason for this difference may be due to the fact that the FERMI-LAT detector did not observe the impulsive peak. In the flare on June 11, 1991, Rank et al. [17] and Kanbach et al. [18] reported that the intensity of gamma rays at the impulsive phase was about ~1,000 times more intensive than that of the gradual phase. Therefore, the SNT located on a high mountain may have observed gamma rays emitted during the impulsive phase. However, the SNT could not observe an enhancement of gamma rays emitted during the gradual phase due to the high background. Summary and Conclusion We have reevaluated the time profiles of high energy photons and neutrons observed by several detectors in association with the M3.7 flare on March 11, 2011. The different intensities recorded by the SN-SNT and SEDA may be consistently explained as gamma rays by a new MC calculation. The excess observed on September 25th, 2011 by the Tibet SNT may be also explained by the detection of solar gamma rays. To the best of our knowledge, there was no report on the detection of solar gamma rays by a ground based detector. This report may be the first report on the detection of solar gamma rays. Many cosmic ray detectors are located at high mountains. Gamma rays are a useful tool to study particle acceleration processes at the Sun. 10

28800 28600 28400 28200 28000 27800 27600 27400 27200 27000 26800 counts/min. 2011.3.7 Counting rate of L1 channel of SN-SNT 19 19.2 19.4 19.6 19.8 20 20.2 20.4 20.6 20.8 21 21.2 21.4 UT Figure 6. Three-minute running average of one-minute values of the L1 channel observed by the SN- SNT. The counting rate from 19:05 to 21:30 UT is shown. Two enhancements of the counting rate are recognized at 19h49m 20h02mUT (or 19.82-20.03UT) and 20h50m 21h01mUT. The statistical significance is very high at 9.7σ for the 1 st peak and 8.5σ for the 2 nd peak. As an average background rate, we use 27,500 counts per minute. counts/min. 88000 Counting rate of N1 channel in one-minute values 87500 87000 86500 86000 85500 85000 84500 84000 19 19.2 19.4 19.6 19.8 20 20.2 20.4 20.6 20.8 21 21.2 21.4 Figure 7. The counting rate of neutron channel N1 of SN-SNT. The vertical counting rate corresponds to the one-minute value for the 4-m 2 area scintillator. The N1 channel records neutral incident particles with energy higher than 30 MeV. The energy of the detector has been calibrated by using the energy deposited by passing muons. As seen in the above figure, no remarkable enhancements are recognized around 19.95 UT and 20.9 UT. UT 11

counts/min. グラフタイトル L3 channel of Tibet SNT 46500 46000 45500 45000 44500 44000 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 UT Figure 8. Similar enhancement observed by the SNT located in Tibet (4,300 m). The SNT has an area of 9 m 2 and the thickness of the plastic scintillator is 40-cm. The enhancement started at 04:37 UT (12:37 Beijing time (indicated by an arrow). During this time, no enhancement was observed by the neutron monitor located at the same site. Therefore, we think that the enhancement was produced by gamma rays. counts/min. N1 channel; >40MeV neutral incidents of Tibet SNT 146000 145000 144000 143000 142000 141000 140000 139000 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 UT Figure 9. Counting rate of the neutral channel with the threshold energy higher than 40 MeV. Those signals are mainly produced by the protons induced by incoming neutrons via charge exchange process. However when gamma-rays enter into the scintillator, they also produce electron-positron pairs. Electrons and positrons are the minimum ionizing particles, so they penetrate the scintillator and enter into the PR-counters located underneath. Therefore the enhancement of Figure 8 is induced by gamma rays. 12

counts/min. 2011.9.25 Tibet neutron detector 19500 19000 18500 18000 17500 17000 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 UT Figure 10. The neutron-muon monitor located at the same site in Tibet (4300 m) [19]. No remarkable enhancement can be seen around 04:37 UT (indicated by the arrow). The data are corrected for the pressure effect. count/min. 2011.9.25 L1 channel of Tibet SNT 65500 65000 64500 64000 63500 63000 62500 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 UT Figure 11. The one minute value of the L1 channel of Tibet SNT. An enhancement may be recognized at 04:37 UT (or 4.62 UT). The counting rate of the L1 channel represents the penetrating particles from the scintillator after neutral particles are converted into charged protons or electrons in the scintillator. Between the L1 channel and L3 channel, a 10cm thick wood plate is installed. The L1 channel has a sensitivity for lower energy protons or electrons in comparison with that of L3 channel. When we take the average counting rate of L1 channel as 63,300, the statistical significance of the enhancement during 04:37 and 04:43UT turns out as to be 8.9σ by the Li-Ma method. 13

1.015 (L3/N1 )*3.14 of Tibet SNT 1.01 1.005 1 0.995 0.99 0.985 0.98 4 5 UT 6 7 Figure 12. The counting ratio between L3 channel and N1 (En>40MeV) channel. To the counting rate of L3, a factor 3.14 is multiplied. Except around 4.63UT (or 04:38UT), the L3 and N1 channels varied with the statistical fluctuation. 1000 2011.9.25 SEDA-FIB neutrons number of events 100 10 04:45 UT start 1 10 100 1000 10000 Energy [MeV] Figure 13. The energy spectrum of solar neutrons by the SEDA-FIB detector. The spectrum is obtained assuming an instantaneous production at 04:45UT. The blue diamond shows the raw data, while the red square represents the corrected data of the decay effect in flight between the Sun and the Earth. It seems that the spectrum may be composed by the two components, the low energy part and high energy part. This means that the assumption of one instantaneous production time may be imperfect. The peaks of the neutron monitor around 5.1 UT may reflect the arrival of solar neutrons (See Figure 10). 14

Figure 14. The SDO/AIA images on September 25, 2011 event. The dotted white circles present the locations of the maximum intensity of the UV light. Left: 04:32:09UT, right 04:42-00UT. The coordinates are (-670, 130 ) and (-705, 140 ) respectively. References [1] Ackermann, A. et al. (2014) ApJ 785, 15, doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/1/15. [2] Koga, K. et al. (2017) Solar Physics (to be published). [3] Muraki, Y. et al. (2013) submitted to Proceedings of the 33 rd ICRC in Rio, arxiv:1307.5125v1 [astro-ph] (19 Jul 2013). [4] Meegan, C. et al. (2009) ApJ 702, 791, GBM, doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/1/791. [5] Atwood et al. (2009) ApJ, 697, 1071, DOI:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071. [6] http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/browser/?show=grth+qlpcr [7] Imaida, I. et al. (1999) Nucl. Inst. Meth., A421, 99, doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(98)01163-2. [8] Koga, K. et al. (2011) Astrophy. Space Sci. Trans., 7, 411, DOI: 10.5194/astra-7-411-2011. [9] Muraki, Y. et al. (2012) Advances in Astronomy. Article ID 37904, DOI: 10.1155/2012/379304. [10] Muraki, Y. et al. (2016) Solar Physics. 291, 1241, DOI: 10.1007/s11207-016-0887-0. [11] Chen, X. et al. (2013) ApJ, 763, 43, doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/43. [12] Valdes-Galicia, J.F. et al. (2004) Nucl. Inst. Meth. A535, 656, DOI:1 0.1016/j.nima.2004.06-148. [13] Sako, T. et al., ApJ, 651 (2006) L69. [14] Muraki, Y. (2007) Astroparticle Physics. 28, 119-131, DOI: 10.1016/j.astrophysics.2007.04.012. [15] Watanabe, K., Proceeding of the Cosmic-Ray Research Section of Nagoya University, Vol. 46 (2005) 1-247. ISSN 0910-0717 (PhD thesis in English). [16] Kamiya, K. et al, Proceeding of 35 th ICRC (Pusan). [17] Rank, G. et al. (2001) Astronomy and Astrophysics. 378, 1046, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011060. [18] Kanbach, G. et al. (1993) Astronomy & Astrophysics, Suppl. 97, 349. [19] Zhang, J.L. et al., Proceeding of 29 th ICRC (Pune), 1(2005), 9-12. On-line version is available: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/seri/icrc./0029//a000009.000.html Or: https: //cds.cern.ch/record/957287/files/11009-chn-zhang-j-abs2-sh11-oral.pdf 15