Solution to the twin paradox. Magnus Axelsson

Similar documents
AST1100 Lecture Notes

8 Part 8: Making experiments with special relativity

Special Theory of Relativity. The Newtonian Electron. Newton vs. Einstein. So if Newtonian Physics is wrong. It is all Relative.

Correct Resolution of the Twin Paradox

2.4 The Lorentz Transformation

Announcements. Muon Lifetime. Lecture 4 Chapter. 2 Special Relativity. SUMMARY Einstein s Postulates of Relativity: EXPERIMENT

PHY100S. PHY100S (K. Strong) - Lecture 15 - Slide 1.

Observations versus Measurements

Modern Physics. Light and Relativity

Announcement. Einstein s Postulates of Relativity: PHYS-3301 Lecture 3. Chapter 2. Sep. 5, Special Relativity

2.3 The Lorentz Transformation Eq.

Tech Notes 4 and 5. Let s prove that invariance of the spacetime interval the hard way. Suppose we begin with the equation

Relativity. Overview & Postulates Events Relativity of Simultaneity. Relativity of Time. Relativity of Length Relativistic momentum and energy

Chapter 26 Special Theory of Relativity

Special Relativity 1

Advantages of Three-Dimensional Space-Time Frames

Special relativity, 3. How big is gamma? The Lorentz transformations depend on the factor γ =

The result is; distances are contracted in the direction of motion.

Special Relativity Lecture

Physics H7C Midterm 2 Solutions

Consequences of special relativity.

Consequences of special relativity.

AST2000 Lecture Notes

RELATIVITY. Special Relativity

The Foundations of Special Relativity

Relativity. An explanation of Brownian motion in terms of atoms. An explanation of the photoelectric effect ==> Quantum Theory

Newtonian or Galilean Relativity

Chapter 26. Relativity

More Relativity: The Train and The Twins

Inconsistencies in Special Relativity? Sagnac Effect and Twin Paradox

Talking about general relativity Important concepts of Einstein s general theory of relativity. Øyvind Grøn Berlin July 21, 2016

Therefore F = ma = ma = F So both observers will not only agree on Newton s Laws, but will agree on the value of F.

Notes - Special Relativity

Two postulates Relativity of simultaneity Time dilation; length contraction Lorentz transformations Doppler effect Relativistic kinematics

EPGY Special and General Relativity. Lecture 4B

04. Kinematical Effects 1. Time Dilation

Changing coordinates - the Lorentz transformation

4/13/2015. Outlines CHAPTER 12 ELECTRODYNAMICS & RELATIVITY. 1. The special theory of relativity. 2. Relativistic Mechanics

Lecture Notes on Relativity. Last updated 10/1/02 Pages 1 65 Lectures 1 10

Transformations. 1 The Lorentz Transformation. 2 Velocity Transformation

College Physics B - PHY2054C. Special & General Relativity 11/12/2014. My Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00 AM - Noon 206 Keen Building.

CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1

Test 3 results B A. Grades posted in Learn

Pay close attention... because

On the Arbitrary Choice Regarding Which Inertial Reference Frame is "Stationary" and Which is "Moving" in the Special Theory of Relativity

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

Paradoxes in Special Relativity Paradoxes in Special Relativity. Dr. Naylor

Lorentz Transformations

The relativistic length contraction rebutted

Prelims 1997 Question 6

OPTION G SPECIAL AND GENERAL RELATIVITY. 0.5 c

Michael Fowler, UVa Physics, 12/1/07. Momentum has Direction

RELATIVITY. Special Relativity

Einstein s theory of special relativity

PHYSICS - CLUTCH CH 34: SPECIAL RELATIVITY.

dt = p m, (2.1.1) dt = p

Lecture 13 Notes: 07 / 20. Invariance of the speed of light

Chapter 3 Time dilation from the classical wave equation. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

Special Theory of Relativity (I) Newtonian (Classical) Relativity. Newtonian Principle of Relativity. Inertial Reference Frame.

Lecture 4 - Lorentz contraction and the Lorentz transformations

Kinematics of special relativity

Einstein in a Nutshell

College Physics B - PHY2054C. Special Relativity 11/10/2014. My Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00 AM - Noon 206 Keen Building.

The spacetime of special relativity

Extra notes on rela,vity. Wade Naylor

Inflation, vacua and the end of the Universe

Friday, November 29, The challenge of interstellar travel

Chapter 1. Relativity 1

Lorentz Transformations and the Twin Paradox By James Carter

PHSC 1053: Astronomy Relativity

The Lorentz Transformations

Topics: Relativity: What s It All About? Galilean Relativity Einstein s s Principle of Relativity Events and Measurements

If the Speed of Light is Not an Universal Constant According to the Theory of Reference Frames: on the Physical Nature of Neutrino

New problem of twin paradox

Unit 10: Relativity Hewitt Chapters Brent Royuk Phys-109 Concordia University

The Twin Paradox Resolved

The Problem of Slowing Clocks in Relativity Theory

CH 2, Sample Problem 2

Experimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time

2.1 Einstein s postulates of Special Relativity. (i) There is no ether (there is no absolute system of reference).

Special Relativity 05/09/2008. Lecture 14 1

12:40-2:40 3:00-4:00 PM

0 : Einstein s postulates of Special Relativity

On Einstein s Time Dilation and Length Contraction

Name the object labelled B and explain its purpose.

Lesson 12 Relativity

Elements of Physics II

SPECIAL RELATIVITY. Chapter 28

Avoiding the Block Universe: A Reply to Petkov Peter Bokulich Boston University Draft: 3 Feb. 2006

Relativistic Transformations

More with Special Relativity

= m(v) X B = m(0) 0 + m(v) x B m(0) + m(v) u = dx B dt B. m + m(v) v. 2u 1 + v A u/c 2 = v = 1 + v2. c 2 = 0

The Lorentz Transformation

The Theory of Relativity

Lecture 3 and 4. Relativity of simultaneity. Lorentz-Einstein transformations

Engineering Physics 1 Dr. Rajdeep Chatterjee Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology-Roorkee

Appendices. Chapter Appendix A: Qualitative relativity questions

Simultaneity And Time Dilation

Absolute motion versus relative motion in Special Relativity is not dealt with properly

on Tests Using a Cryogenic Optical Resonator

Transcription:

Solution to the twin paradox Magnus Axelsson 20th November 2008

Problem 1.1 In the Earth frame (which we will refer to as the Laboratory system) the spaceship travels from Earth to Rigel a distance of 800 light years which takes t = 800/0.99995 = 800.04 years. Due to time dilation the same trip takes a factor of γ less in the spaceship frame. Thus I measure that the time on my wristwatch is t = t γ = t 1 v 2 = 800.04yrs 1 (0.99995) 2 = 8yrs (1) (where v is the speed of the spaceship measured in the Laboratory frame). Problem 1.2 Since we are ignoring the time it takes to perform measurements (this might take a day or so, which is completely negligent compared to the time it took to travel to Rigel). Due to symmetry considerations we therefore conclude that the return trip to Earth from Rigel takes the same time as the trip to Rigel from Earth. This conclusion is valid in both the Laboratory and the spaceship frame. Problem 1.3 Summary: The trip takes a total of 1600.08 years in the Earth frame. In the spaceship my wristwatch measures that the same trip took 16 years. Problem 1.4 We now switch coordinate systems and consider the spaceship frame as the Laboratory system with coordinates (x,t), and the Earth frame as the moving system with coordinates (x,t ). In the spaceship the trip took t = 8 years. By virtue of the Lorentz transformations we now find that an observer in the Earth frame measures the trip to take t = t γ = 8yrs = 0.08yrs (2) 100 An observer in the Earth frame finds that Rigel arrives at the spaceship s position after 0.08 years! Problem 1.5 As in section 2 we appeal to symmetry. Therefore the trip takes 16 years in the spaceship frame, and 0.16 years in the Earth frame. Problem 1.6 It appears to be a paradox, but we will shortly find that really isn t! Do you know why this isn t really a paradox? What have we forgotten? 1

Problem 1.7 The previous calculations are not all valid and this is because we have violated one of the first principles of special relativity! The principle of relativity states that The laws of physics are equal in all inertial reference frames. For the spaceship to attain a speed comparable to the speed of light it must accelerate, thus introducing fictional forces. Therefore the spaceship frame is no longer inertial. Since we are constantly changing frame of reference the Lorentz transformations (which are deduced for constant speed) are no longer valid thus making our previous calculations invalid. Problem 1.8 To rectify the situation we introduce three different frames of reference (see figure in the problem text). The Earth frame (Laboratory system), with coordinates (x,t), The outgoing elevator (spaceship) frame, coordinates (x,t ), The returning elevator frame, coordinates (x,t ). We define event A to be the departure of the spaceship from Earth. We then have: (x A,t A ) = (0,0) and (x A,t A ) = (0,0) (3) Event B is me in the spaceship arriving at Rigel a distance L 0 from Earth: (x B,t B ) = (L 0,L 0 /v) and (x B,t B) = (0,t B) (4) From these calculations we see that t B = L 0 /v. Problem 1.9 We use the Lorentz transformation to obtain t B = t B γ = L 0 1 v v 2 = 8yrs (5) In the spaceship we still find that the trip to Rigel takes 8 years. Problem 1.10 Event B is defined as the event when an observer in another box in the same elevator looks out of his window and checks what time the clocks on Earth show. It is assumed that this observer has a clock which is synchronized with mine and hence t B = t B (where t B is the time my clock measures when I arrive at Rigel. For event B we thus have (x B,t B ) = (0,t B ) (6) (x B,t B ) = (x B,t B ) (7) 2

Invariance of the line element between event A (where all coordinates are zero in both reference frames) and B gives s 2 AB = s 2 AB t2 B = t 2 B x 2 B (8) with the result t B = t 2 B x 2 B (9) In the previous section we found an expression for t B so it remains to find an expression for x B. This is not so hard. The observer in the outgoing elevator moving with speed v finds that the distance between Earth and Rigel is length contracted by a factor of γ. Thus x B = L 0 γ = L 0 1 v 2 (10) The minus sign arises since I have chosen the positive x-axis to point from Earth to Rigel, but this does not matter since we need the square of this quantity. If we insert these factors we find t B = (L 0 /v) 2 (1 v 2 ) L 2 0 (1 v2 ) = (L 0 /v) 2 (1 v 2 ) 2 which was to be shown. Problem 1.11 = (L 0 /v)(1 v 2 ) = L 0 v vl 0 (11) If we insert L 0 = 800lyrs and v = 0.99995 we find t B = 0.08 years. The observations are not simultaneous. Problem 1.12 Event D is defined as when person P in the returning elevator frame (coordinates (x,t )) starts his journey towards Rigel a distance 2L 0 away from Earth (seen from the Earth frame). Then (x D,t D ) = (0,0). We want to know what time person P s clocks show when he arrives at Rigel. Since he arrives at Rigel at the same time as I do in my outgoing elevator (event B) we examine the line elements between events B and D. We have s 2 BD = t2 BD x2 BD = (t B t D ) 2 (x B x D ) 2 = (L 0 /v 0) 2 (L 0 2L 0 ) 2 = (L 0 /v) 2 L 2 0 (12) where we have used the fact that event D is simultaneous with event A in the Earth frame. For the line element in the returning elevator frame we find s 2 BD = t 2 BD x 2 BD = (t B t D )2 (x B x D )2 = t 2 B (13) where we have used x B = 0 since we are measuring distances relative to the returning elevator frame (you should make sure you understand why this is so). Invariance then gives t 2 B = (L 0/v) 2 L 2 0 t B = (L 0/v) 1 v 2 = L 0 vγ (14) 3

Problem 1.13 An observer in the returning elevator frame at Earth s postion x = 0 looks out of his window and checks what time the Earth clocks show. This happens simultaneously with person P arriving at Rigel, in Person P s reference frame. Again we assume that person P and the observer have synchronized clocks. We label the observation of the Earth clocks event B. We will now look at the space and time intervals between events B and D. In the Earth system: In the returning elevator frame: t D = t A = 0, t B = t B t DB = t B x D = 2L 0, x B = 0 x DB = 2L 0 (15) t D = 0, t B = t B = L 0 /(vγ) t DB = L 0/(vγ) x D = 0, x B = L 0/γ (16) x DB = L 0/γ (17) Here x B is the observers position (he is at Earth) relative to person P at Rigel. In the Earth frame this distance is L 0 but since he is moving with speed v the distance gets contracted by a factor of γ. We could also have included a minus sign, but I haven chosen the axis to have positive direction towards Earth for this calculation (this will not have any influence on the calculations anyway...) Problem 1.14 We calculate the line element in both reference frames: s 2 DB = t2 DB x2 DB = t2 B (2L 0) 2 s 2 DB Setting them equal we find And finally = t 2 DB x 2 DB = (L 0/(vγ)) 2 (L 0 /γ) 2 t 2 B = (2L 0) 2 + (L 0 /(vγ)) 2 (L 0 /γ) 2 = 4L 2 0 + (L 0/v) 2 (1 v 2 ) L 2 0 (1 v2 ) = 4L 2 0 + L2 0 v 2 2L2 0 + L 2 0v 2 = (L 0 /v) 2 + 2L 2 0 + L 2 0v 2 (18) ( ) 2 L0 = v + L 0v (19) t B = L 0 v + L 0v (20) Inserting numbers we find t B = 1600 years. Surprised? 4