PART 5-1: Compartment fire

Similar documents
A fire resistance assessment case history G.C. and M.E. Giuliani

PART 5a : Worked examples Example to EN 1991 Part 1-2: Compartment fire

DIF SEK. PART 5a WORKED EXAMPLES. DIFSEK Part 5a: Worked examples 0 / 62

PART 1: Thermal & Mechanical Actions

NATURAL FIRES IN LARGE SCALE COMPARTMENTS

Structural Fire Design according to Eurocodes

Example: Parametric fire curve for a fire compartment

Probabilistic Study of the Resistance of a Simply-Supported Reinforced Concrete Slab According to Eurocode Parametric Fire

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

BUS5 Building structures 5: Fire safety

9-3. Structural response

Safety concept for structural fire design application and validation in steel and composite construction

WP7 GUIDELINE FOR GLOBAL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS USING NEW BEAM-COLUMN FINITE ELEMENT

Assessing the Level of Safety for Performance Based and Prescriptive Structural Fire Design of Steel Structures

SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFORMATIONS OF RC FRAMES DURING FIRE EXPOSURE

PART 2 THERMAL RESPONSE. DIF SEK Part 2: Thermal Response 0/ 44

TREES Training for Renovated Energy Efficient Social housing

A NEW CURVE FOR TEMPERATURE-TIME RELATIONSHIP IN COMPARTMENT FIRE. Milan Đ. BLAGOJEVIĆ *, Dušica J. PEŠIĆ

TheEuropeanUnion EDICTOFGOVERNMENT±

POSTER PAPER PROCEEDINGS

Computer Evaluation of Results by Room Thermal Stability Testing

Peak pressure in flats due to gas explosions

RELIABLITY OF CURVED TIMBER BEAM EXPOSED TO FIRE

Fire Dynamics Simulator vs. Parametric fire curves

CFD ANALYSES USED TO EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF COMPARTMENT GEOMETRY ON THE POSSIBILITY OF DEVELOPMENT OF A TRAVELLING FIRE

FUNDAMENTALS OF HVAC

AXIAL BUCKLING RESISTANCE OF PARTIALLY ENCASED COLUMNS

Fire Dynamics. José L. Torero A. James Clark School of Engineering, The University of Maryland, USA

INFLUENCE OF ZINC COATING TO A TEMPERATURE OF STEEL MEMBERS IN FIRE

OPTIMUM RELIABILITY OF A STEEL TAPERED PORTAL FRAME STRUCTURE EXPOSED TO FIRE

RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING STRUCTURES

Validation of a one zone room fire model with well defined experiments

Experimental study and advanced CFD simulation of fire safety performance of building external wall insulation system

Design issues of thermal induced effects and temperature dependent material properties in Abaqus

Chapter 5 Test. Directions: Write the correct letter on the blank before each question.

MODELING THE EFFECTIVE ELASTIC MODULUS OF RC BEAMS EXPOSED TO FIRE

Acknowledgements. iii

BUILDING FIRE SAFETY: NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EVACUATION PLANNING. Vatsal Sanjay, Arup Kumar Das

Politecnico di Milano

CFD Modelling of Compartment Fires

Modelling of a Structure under Permanent and Fire Design Situation

Explosive Dust in Pellet Manufacturing Plants

DESIGN OF END PLATE JOINTS SUBJECT TO MOMENT AND NORMAL FORCE

Flammable/Combustible Liquid Storage

Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

Autumn 2005 THERMODYNAMICS. Time: 3 Hours

Fire Engineering Principles Workbook

L 305/8 Official Journal of the European Union (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION

The thermal performance of lightweight timber frame structures during the summer period

5. AN INTRODUCTION TO BUILDING PHYSICS

STUDY REPORT SR 314 (2014) The Relationship Between Fire Severity and Time-Equivalence. CA Wade, JT Gerlich and A Abu

Surface-mounting Thermostats ATH Type Series

USE OF CFD TOOL ANSYS FLUENT FOR FIRE SAFETY IMPROVEMENT OF AN INDOOR SPORTS ARENA

Flashover Fires in Small Residential Units with an Open Kitchen

Fire resistance assessment of Composite structures

EARLY AGE THERMAL CRACK CONTROL IN MASS CONCRETE

New correlations for the standard EN 1264

Hybrid Simulation Method for a Structure Subjected to Fire. and its Application to a Steel Frame

FIRE IMPOSED HEAT FLUXES FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

THERMAL AND STRESS ANALYSIS OF GLAZING SYSTEMS UNDER FIRE CONDITIONS

Large scale diesel oil burns

ESTIMATION OF AUTOMOBILE COOLING LOADS FOR AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM DESIGN

FIERAdetection Model (DTRM) Theory Report

Introduction to Fire Design Theory Titular disciplina: Conf. dr. ing. Raul ZAHARIA

THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Simplified Analytical Determination of the Temperature Distribution and the Load Bearing Resistance of Slim-Floor Beams

UNIT FOUR SOLAR COLLECTORS

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

The temperature development of hot dip galvanized steel members in fire

MCS 7 Chia Laguna, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy, September 11-15, 2011

tel.: , fax: , mobile:

PsD Testing Quality Control

Response function method

IR F ( C) ENGLISH INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Thermometer

Study of the influence of heat transfer of a CLT beam through FEM

Lesson 7: Thermal and Mechanical Element Math Models in Control Systems. 1 lesson7et438a.pptx. After this presentation you will be able to:

Aalborg Universitet. Publication date: Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

The influence of solar radiation on the distribution of temperatures in historic masonry

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

CFD ANALYSIS OF A POOL FIRE IN AN OFFSHORE PLATFORM

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

Risk. Management. Bulletin. Created by. Insurance Fully Managed Claims Service Financial Advice paveygroup.co.uk

The Effect of Cross-sectional Area and Air Velocity on the Conditions in a Tunnel during a Fire

LINEAR SOURCES WITH NON-LINEAR DISTRIBUTION OF SOUND ENERGY. Miroslav Kučera, Richard Nový, Jiří Bašta

Multiple-Vehicle Fire Loads for Precast Concrete Parking Structures

WM 07 Conference, February 25 March 01, 2007, Tucson, AZ

Integrated Circuits Thermal Test Method Environment Conditions - Natural Convection (Still Air)

Winter Thermal Comfort in 19 th Century Traditional Buildings of the Town of Florina, in North-Western Greece

Energy flows and modelling approaches

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Determination of thermal steady state in the wall with semi Dirichlet boundary conditions

Risk Analysis in Building Fire Safety Engineering

Measurement of Acoustic Properties of light weight concrete SL-Deck

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4

Probabilistic assessment of geotechnical objects by means of MONTE CARLO METHOD. Egidijus R. Vaidogas

Influence of Modelling Issues on Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis of a Regular 3D Steel Structure. A. Belejo; R. Bento - Maio de

Basis of Design, a case study building

A. Belejo, R. Bento & C. Bhatt Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal 1.INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

PART 5-1: Compartment fire P. Schaumann T. Trautmann University of Hannover Germany J. Žižka Czech Technical University in Prague Czech Republic 1 TASK The gas temperature of a fully engulfed fire in an office has to be determined. The room of the Simulated Office test of the Cardington building is chosen for this analysis. The measured temperatures during the fully engulfed fire are shown in Figure 3 so the calculation can be compared with these results. A natural fire model is chosen for the calculation of the gas temperature. For fires with a flash-over the method of the compartment fires can be used. A simple calculation method for a parametric temperature-time curve is given in Annex A of EN 1991-1-2. Figure 1. Cardington building (left) and the office of the Simulated Office test (right) Floor area: A f = 135 m² Total area of enclosures A t = 474 m² Total area of vertical openings: A v = 27 m² Vertical opening factor: α v = 0.2 Horizontal opening factor: α h = 0.0 Height: H = 4.0 m Average window height: Lightweight concrete: Fire growth rate h eq = 1.8 m (assumption) ρ = 1900 kg/m² c = 840 J/kgK λ = 1.0 W/mK medium

2 DETERMINATION OF FIRE LOAD DENSITY EN 1991-1-2 For the determination of the fire load density the Annex E of EN 1991-1-2 offers a calculation model. The design value of the load density may either be given from a national fire load classification of occupancies and/or specific for an individual project by performing a fire load evaluation. At this example the second method is chosen. q = q m δ δ δ Annex E.1 f d f k q1 q2 n m the combustion factor δ q1 the factor considering the danger of fire activation by size of the compartment δ q2 the factor considering the fire activation risk due to the type of occupancy δ n the factor considering the different active fire fighting measures The fire load consisted of 20 % plastics 11 % paper and 69 % wood so it consisted mainly of cellulosic material. Therefore the combustion factor is: m = 0.8 The factor δ q1 considers the danger of fire activation by size of the compartment as given in Table 1. Table 1. Fire activation risk due to the size of the compartment (see EN 1991-1-2 Table E.1) Compartment floor area A f [m²] 25 250 2500 5000 10000 Danger of fire activation δ q1 1.10 1.50 1.90 2.00 2.13 δ q1 = 1.5 A factor δ q2 considers the fire activation risk due to the type of occupancy as given in Table 2. Table 2. Fire activation risk due to the type of occupancy (see EN 1991-1-2 Table E.1) Danger of fire activation δ q2 Examples of occupancies 0.78 artgallery museum swimming pool 1.00 offices residence hotel paper industry 1.22 manufactory for machinery & engines 1.44 chemical laboratory painting workshop 1.66 manufactory for fireworks or paints δ q2 = 1.0 The factor taking the different active fire fighting measures into account is calculated to: δ 10 n = i= 1 The factors δ ni are given in Table 3. δ ni

Table 3. Factors δ ni (see EN 1991-1-2 Table E.2) δ ni function of active fire fighting measures Automatic fire Automatic water extinguishing suppression system Automatic fire detection Manual fire suppression Independent water supplies Automatic fire detection & alarm Automatic alarm transmission to fire brigade δ n1 0.61 δ n2 0 1.0 1 0.87 2 0.7 δ n3 By heat or 0.87 δ n4 by smoke 0.73 δ n5 0.87 Work Fire Brigade δ n6 0.61 Off Site Fire Brigade δ n7 0.78 Safe access routes δ n8 0.9 or 1.0 or 1.5 Fire fighting devices δ n9 1.0 or 1.5 Smoke exhaust system δ n10 1.0 or 1.5 δ n = 1.0 0.73 0.87 0.78 1.0 1.0 1.0 = 0.50 For calculating the characteristic fire load the characteristic fire load has to be determined. It is defined as: Qfi k = Mki Hui ψ i Annex E.2 M ki the amount of combustible material [kg] H ui the net calorific value [MJ/kg] see EN 1991-1-2 Table E.3 ψ i the optional factor for assessing protected fire loads The total fire loading was equivalent to 46 kg wood/m² so the characteristic fire load is: Q fi k = 135 46 17.5 1.0 = 108 675 MJ The characteristic fire load density is determined to: qf k= Qfi k Af= 108675 135 = 805 MJ/m² The design value of the fire load density is calculated to: q f d = 805 0.8 1.5 1.0 0.5 = 483.0 MJ/m² 3 CALCULATION OF THE PARAMETRIC TEMPERATURE-TIME Annex A CURVE It has to be determined if the fully engulfed fire is fuel or ventilation controlled. For this the opening factor and the design value of the fire load density related to the total surface are needed. 12 0.02 O= heq Av At = 1.8 27 474 = 0.076 m 0.2

and q = q A A = 483.0 135 474 = 137.6MJ m td f d f t The determination if the fire is fuel or ventilation controlled is: 3 3 qtd O tlim 0.2 10 = 0.2 10 137.6 0.076 = 0.362 h > = 0.333 h The fire is ventilation controlled For calculation of the temperature-time curves for the heating and the cooling phase the b factor is needed. This factor considers the thermal absorptivity for the boundary of enclosure. The density the specific heat and the thermal conductivity of the boundary may be taken at ambient temperature. The floor the slab and the walls are made of lightweight concrete b ρ c λ J 1900 840 1.0 1263.3 ms = = = 2 1 2 The temperature-time curve in the heating phase is given by: θ g K 2 100 2200 0.2 t* 1.7 t* 19 t* = 20 + 1325 1 0.324 e 0.204 e 0.472 e Because the fire is ventilation controlled the time t* is calculated to: t* = t Γ ( Ob) ( 0.076 1263.3) 2 2 Γ= = = 3.04 2 2 0.04 1160 0.04 1160 Now the heating phase can be calculated: 0.2 ( 3.04 t) 1.7 ( 3.04 t) 19 ( 3.04 t) θ g = 20 + 1325 ( 1 0.324 e 0.204 e 0.472 e ) For calculation of the cooling phase the maximum temperature is needed. max max max ( 0.2 t * 1.7 t * 19 t e e e * ) θmax = 20 + 1325 1 0.324 0.204 0.427 t = t Γ * max max The time t max is determined as below where t lim is given in Table 4. t max 3 3 0.2 10 qtd O= 0.2 10 137.6 0.076 = 0.363 h = max tlim = 0.333 h Table 4. Time t lim for different fire growth rates Slow fire growth rate Medium fire growth rate Fast fire growth rate t lim [h] 0.417 0.333 0.250 So t* max is calculated to: t * = 0.363 3.04 = 1.10 h max

The maximum temperature is calculated to: ( 0.2 1.10 1.7 e e 1.10 e 19 1.10 ) θmax = 20 + 1325 1 0.324 0.204 0.427 = 958.8 C During the cooling phase t* and t* max are calculated to: [ ] t* = t Γ= t 3.04 h 3 ( td ) t* = 0.2 10 q O Γ= 1.10h max The temperature-time curve in the cooling phase for 0.5 t* max 2.0 is given by: θg = θmax 250 ( 3 t* max ) ( t* t* max x) = 958.8 250 3 1.10 t 3.04 1.10 1.0 t max > t lim x = 1.0 Combination of the heating and cooling curves leads to the parametric temperature-time curve shown in Figure 2. 1600 temperature [ C] 1400 1200 1000 800 600 parametric temperature-time curve Heating phase Cooling phase 400 200 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 time t [min] Figure 2. Gas temperature of the office calculated by using the parametric temperature-time curve of the office

4 COMPARISON BETWEEN CALCULATION AND FIRE TEST To compare the calculation with the measured temperatures in the test the factors δ 1 δ 2 and δ ni for calculation of the fire load density have to be set to 1.0 (see Figure 3). Figure 3. Comparison of measured and calculated temperature-time curves REFERENCES EN 1991 Eurocode 1:Actions on structures Part 1-2: General actions Actions on structures exposed to fire Brussels: CEN November 2002 The Behaviour of multi-storey steel framed buildings in fire Moorgate: British Steel plc Swinden Technology Centre 1998 Valorisation Project: Natural Fire Safety Concept Sponsored by ECSC June 2001 QUALITY RECORD WP5 DIF SEK Title Example to EN 1994 Part 1-2: Composite beam Eurocode reference(s) EN 1991-1-2:2005; EN 1993-1-2:2006; EN 1994-1-1:2004; EN 1994-1-2:2006 ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Name Company Date Created by P. Schaumann Univ.of Hannover 24/11/2005 T. Trautmann Univ.of Hannover 24/11/2005 Technical content checked by M. Haller ArcelorMittal 24/11/2005 TRANSLATED DOCUMENT Translation made and checked by: J. Chlouba CTU in Prague 10/01/2008 Translated resource approved by: Z. Sokol CTU in Prague 25/01/2008 National technical contact: F. Wald CTU in Prague