Implementation of Bridge Pilings in the ADCIRC Hydrodynamic Model: Upgrade and Documentation for ADCIRC Version 34.19

Similar documents
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF BACKWATER RISE DUE TO BRIDGE PIERS AS FLOW OBSTRUCTIONS

An implicit time-marching algorithm for 2-D GWC shallow water models

BACKWATERRISE DUE TO FLOW CONSTRICTION BY BRIDGE PIERS

PREDICTING TROPICAL CYCLONE FORERUNNER SURGE. Abstract

Richard A. Luettich, Jr. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institute of Marine Sciences 3431 Arendell St. Morehead City, NC 28557

MODELING OF LOCAL SCOUR AROUND AL-KUFA BRIDGE PIERS Saleh I. Khassaf, Saja Sadeq Shakir

Coupled, Unstructured Grid, Wave and Circulation Models: Validation and Resolution Requirements

Truncation Error Analysis of Shallow Water Models Based on the Generalized Wave Continuity Equation

Lateral Inflow into High-Velocity Channels

Guo, James C.Y. (1999). "Critical Flow Section in a Collector Channel," ASCE J. of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol 125, No. 4, April.

Simulation of storm surge and overland flows using geographical information system applications

FINAL OUTREACH REPORT. NAME OF UNIVERSITY RESEARCHER PREPARING REPORT: Scott C. Hagen

THC-T-2013 Conference & Exhibition

1.060 Engineering Mechanics II Spring Problem Set 8

A STUDY OF LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS OF EL-MINIA

Automatic Eddy Viscosity Assignment for 2-D Hydrodynamic Model of Szczecin Bay

THE EFFECTS OF OBSTACLES ON SURFACE LEVELS AND BOUNDARY RESISTANCE IN OPEN CHANNELS

Barotropic Flow in the Vicinity of an Idealized Inlet Simulations with the ADCIRC Model

APPENDIX N. Technical Memorandum on Potential for Seiche

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

Phase II Storm Surge Analysis

Mooring Model for Barge Tows in Lock Chamber

Semi-diurnal seiching in a shallow, micro-tidal lagoonal estuary

Parallel Platform for Multi-Scale CFD Storm Flood Forecast Using Geographical Information System Applications

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW BETWEEN BRIDGE PIERS

Influence of Marsh Restoration and Degradation on Storm Surge and Waves

OPEN CHANNEL FLOW. One-dimensional - neglect vertical and lateral variations in velocity. In other words, Q v = (1) A. Figure 1. One-dimensional Flow

Reservoir Oscillations with Through Flow

Flow estimations through spillways under submerged tidal conditions

Evaluation of Scour Depth around Bridge Piers with Various Geometrical Shapes

Implications of Ice Cover on Storm Surge Dynamics in the Beaufort Sea

Hydraulics Part: Open Channel Flow

Preparation of a Hydrodynamic model of. Detroit River- St. Clair River waterways. with Telemac-2D

THE HYDRAULIC PERFORMANCE OF ORIENTED SPUR DIKE IMPLEMENTATION IN OPEN CHANNEL

4.6 Establishing a Community-Based Extratropical Storm Surge and Tide Model for NOAA s Operational Forecasts for the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts

STORM TIDE HINDCASTS FOR HURRICANE HUGO: INTO AN ESTUARINE AND RIVERINE SYSTEM

VARIED FLOW IN OPEN CHANNELS

St. Clair River Conveyance Change 2007 to 2012

INTRODUCTION TO FLUID MECHANICS June 27, 2013

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BED MORPHOLOGY IN THE REACH BETWEEN CABRUTA AND CAICARA IN ORINOCO RIVER.

Sessom Creek Sand Bar Removal HCP Task 5.4.6

Calibration of Manning s Friction Factor for Rivers in Iraq Using Hydraulic Model (Al-Kufa River as Case study)

The influence of domain size on the response characteristics of a

FLUID MECHANICS. Chapter 9 Flow over Immersed Bodies

A note on critical flow section in collector channels

SEDIMENTATION AND ITS COUNTERMEASURE AT THE OFF-TAKE AREA OF NEW DHALESWARI RIVER

Experimental storm surge forecasting in the Bay of Bengal

Forecast Predictions of Winds, Waves and Storm Surge during Hurricane Arthur (2014)

4. BACKWATER EFFECTS OF PIERS IN SUBCRITICAL FLOW 5. Report Date October Performing Organization Code

ME332 FLUID MECHANICS LABORATORY (PART I)

Chapter 4: Non uniform flow in open channels

North Carolina Coastal Flood Analysis System Model Grid Generation

A NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION MODEL FOR ESTIMATING MANNING S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT

Dynamics of the Ems Estuary

We will assume straight channels with simple geometries (prismatic channels) and steady state flow (in time).

Particle Tracking Model (PTM): II. Overview of Features and Capabilities

Abstract. 1 Introduction

VARIATION OF MANNING S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT WITH SEEPAGE IN SAND-BED CHANNEL *Satish Patel 1 and Bimlesh Kumar 2

Comparison of Average Energy Slope Estimation Formulas for One-dimensional Steady Gradually Varied Flow

Advances in Coastal Inundation Simulation Using Unstructured-Grid Coastal Ocean Models

Chapter 8 - pg. 1 CHAPTER 8 ESTUARIES. To paraphrase Pritchard, a pioneer in studies of estuarine circulation,

STORM SURGE ANALYSIS USING NUMERICAL AND STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES AND COMPARISON WITH NWS MODEL SLOSH. A Thesis MANISH AGGARWAL MASTER OF SCIENCE

Introduction to BASEMENT Basic Simulation Environment for Computation of Environmental Flow and Natural Hazard Simulation

The Shallow Water Equations

Investigation in the Brownlie (1981) Sediment Transport Equation in Open Channels

CEE 3310 Open Channel Flow, Nov. 26,

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Urban Drainage: Hydraulics. Solutions to problem sheet 2: Flows in open channels

IMPLICIT NUMERICAL SCHEME FOR REGULATING UNSTEADY FLOW IN OPEN CHANNEL Mohamed. T. Shamaa 1, and Hmida M. Karkuri 2

ROBERTS BANK CONTAINER EXPANSION COASTAL GEOMORPHOLOGY STUDY. Appendix B

Robert Weaver, Donald Slinn 1

WQMAP (Water Quality Mapping and Analysis Program) is a proprietary. modeling system developed by Applied Science Associates, Inc.

57:020 Mechanics of Fluids and Transfer Processes CONSERVATION OF MASS, LINEAR MOMENTUM, AND ENERGY IN A SLUICE GATE FLOW. dt dt. d ( momentum.

Flood Routing by the Non-Linear Muskingum Model: Conservation of Mass and Momentum

PAPER 333 FLUID DYNAMICS OF CLIMATE

Appendix G.18 Hatch Report Pacific NorthWest LNG Lelu Island LNG Potential Impacts of the Marine Structures on the Hydrodynamics and Sedimentation

SIO 210 Introduction to Physical Oceanography Mid-term examination Wednesday, November 2, :00 2:50 PM

Hydromechanics: Course Summary

Hydrodynamic model of St. Clair River with Telemac-2D Phase 2 report

Investigation of Flow Profile in Open Channels using CFD

PROBABILISTIC HURRICANE TRACK GENERATION FOR STORM SURGE PREDICTION. Jessica L. Smith. Chapel Hill 2017

H4: Steady Flow through a Channel Network

Lecture 9: Tidal Rectification, Stratification and Mixing

The Potential of Tidal Power from the Bay of Fundy

Minimum Specific Energy and Critical Flow Conditions in Open Channels

Representing Bridges in or near TUFLOW

Numerical Experiment on the Fortnight Variation of the Residual Current in the Ariake Sea

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

INTERNAL GRAVITY WAVES

Chapter 3.8: Energy Dissipators. By Dr. Nuray Denli Tokyay

Calculation of Stream Discharge Required to Move Bed Material

R09. d water surface. Prove that the depth of pressure is equal to p +.

Development of a Forecast Capability for Coastal Embayments of the Mississippi Sound

Modeling Nearshore Waves for Hurricane Katrina

39.1 Gradually Varied Unsteady Flow

Appendix 15 Computational Methodology

EFFECT OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISCRETIZATIONS ON THE SIMULATIONS USING CONSTANT-PARAMETER AND VARIABLE-PARAMETER MUSKINGUM METHODS

The Influence of Piers on the Risk of Flooding Upstream from a Bridge

Beaver Creek Corridor Design and Analysis. By: Alex Previte

Two-Dimensional Simulation of Truckee River Hydrodynamics

1.060 Engineering Mechanics II Spring Problem Set 4

Transcription:

Implementation of Bridge Pilings in the ADCIRC Hydrodynamic Model: Upgrade and Documentation for ADCIRC Version 34.19 Richard A. Luettich, Jr. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institute of Marine Sciences 3431 Arendell St. Morehead City, NC 8557 Joannes J. Westerink Dept. of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556 November 19, 1999 Contractors Report Prepared for the DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Coastal Engineering Research Center Waterways Experiment Station US Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg, MS 39180

CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION THEORY USING THE BRIDGE PILING OPTION IN ADCIRC VERSION 34.19 4 FORMAT OF THE SPATIALLY VARYING FRICTION COEFFICIENT/ BRIDGE PILING COEFFICIENT FILE 5 TEST CASE 6 REFERENCES 8 1

INTRODUCTION Given the typical resolution of coastal circulation models, (e.g., in nearshore applications resolved scales are usually 10s to 100s of meters and larger), it is rarely practical to solve explicitly for the small scale flow around obstructions such as bridge pilings (diameters of meters). However, in some situations it may be desirable to include the effects of these subgrid scale obstructions on the resolved scale flow. To accomplish this, a subgrid scale obstruction parameterization has been developed and implemented in ADCIRC. Since the cross-sectional area of these obstructions is usually quite small compared to the cross-sectional area of the flow field (and thus the effect on flow continuity is quite small), their primary effect is to impart additional drag on the resolved scale flow. This report describes the theory behind the obstruction parameterization implemented in ADCIRC, the procedure for utilizing it in a model run and the performance on a simple test case. THEORY The two-dimensional, vertically integrated momentum equations used in ADCIRC (e.g., Eqs. 5 and 6 in Luettich et al. 199) contain bottom friction (drag) terms,, below: τ bx τ by as shown U U U p s 1 τ sx τ bx + U + V fv = + g( ζ αη) + M x+ Dx+ Bx+ t x x x ρo H ρo ρo V V V p s 1 τ sy τ by + U + V + fu = + g( ζ αη) + M y+ Dy+ By+ t x x y ρo H ρo ρo To represent the extra drag caused by subgrid scale obstructions such as bridge pilings, a second contribution has been added to, τ bx τ by, i.e., τ = bottom friction x + obstruction drag x and bx ρ o τ = bottom friction y + obstruction drag y by ρ o Options in ADCIRC exist to express the bottom friction terms as linear, quadratic or hybrid quadratic/manning s n functions of flow velocity (Luettich and Westerink, 1999). The obstruction drag is assumed to be due primarily to form drag and therefore is represented as quadratic in velocity: obstruction drag x = C pu U + V and obstruction drag y = C pv U + V where C p is an obstruction (piling) drag coefficient.

To determine C p for a series of bridge pilings, we have utilized the extensive body of research conducted in the early to mid 1900s on flow around pilings. Yarnell (1934a,b), as summarized by Henderson (1966), fit the change in water level ζ for steady, unidirectional flow past a piling to the following relation: ζ = + + H KFr 4 ( K 5Fr 0.6)( α 15α ) where, H is the total water depth, K is a pier shape factor (Table 1), Fr = U s gh is the square of the Froud number, α is the fraction of the cross section obstructed by the piling, U s is the velocity in the along stream (s) direction and g is the acceleration of gravity. This equation is considered to be valid so long as α < 0.5. Table 1. recommended pier shape factors Pier Shape K_ Semicircular nose and tail 0.9 Lens-shaped nose and tail 0.9 Twin-cylinder piers with connecting diaphragm 0.95 Twin-cylinder piers without diaphragm 1.05 90 deg triangular nose and tail 1.05 Square nose and tail 1.5 For this same case of steady, unidirectional flow in the vicinity of pilings, the corresponding ADCIRC momentum equations simplify to: ζ = s C pfr where ζ s is the free surface gradient in the along stream direction. Approximating this gradient as ζ s, Yarnell s equation and the simplified momentum equation can be combined to obtain an expression for C p : C p = HK K 4 ( + 5Fr 0.6)( α + 15α ) s This equation is used at each time step in ADCIRC, to compute C p at all nodes associated with bridge pilings. This allows the obstruction drag to be computed and added to the bottom friction terms as discussed above. 3

We note that Yarnell s equation is based on H and U s values measured at a point downstream of the pilings. ADCIRC uses H and U s at the effective piling location to minimize complications due to changing flow direction, e.g., due to reversal of the tide. Typical elevation and velocity changes that result are small enough that the overall results are not compromised by this approximation. USING THE BRIDGE PILING OPTION IN ADCIRC VERSION 34.19 Special considerations must be used when designing a grid for an ADCIRC application that includes the effects of bridge pilings. Specifically, it is necessary to build the grid to provide at least three rows of nodes that parallel the bridge span. One row of nodes (centerline nodes) should lie along the approximate centerline of the bridge while the second and third rows of nodes (adjacent nodes) should lie on either side of the centerline nodes in the along steam direction. An initial implementation of obstruction drag in ADCIRC placed this drag entirely at the row of centerline nodes. However, tests showed that this arrangement led to significant oscillations in the numerical solution. The oscillations abated when the obstruction drag was distributed in the along stream direction so that 5 percent was located at each row of adjacent nodes and 50 percent was located at the row of centerline nodes. Node numbers and coefficient values at all nodes on the centerline and two adjacent rows must be entered in the fort.1 file (as described below). It is not necessary for centerline nodes to correspond to actual piling positions, (i.e., in the cross stream direction), since the overall effect of the pilings on the large scale circulation is all that is being represented. It is important, however, to construct a grid that is as uniform as possible in the vicinity of the bridge. The presence of bridge pilings is signaled to ADCIRC via the parameter NWP located in the master input parameter file (fort.15). Depending on the value specified for NWP, ADCIRC may read in spatially varying frictional information from a fort.1 file. The parameter NWP may have the following values: NWP = 0 NWP = 1 NWP = Spatially constant linear or nonlinear bottom friction. Friction parameters are read from the fort.15 file. Spatially varying linear or quadratic bottom friction. Requires reading in spatially varying friction coefficients for the entire grid from the fort.1 file. This option does not work for NOLIBF=. Localized areas of enhanced friction due to bridge pilings. Requires reading node numbers and appropriate coefficients from the fort.1 file. 4

FORMAT OF THE SPATIALLY VARYING FRICTION COEFFICIENT/BRIDGE PILING COEFFICIENT FILE The format for the fort.1 file depends on the value specified for NWP as follows: NWP = 0 the fort.1 file is not read NWP = 1 the fort.1 file has the following format: AFRIC I, FRIC(I) (this line is repeated for I=1,NP) where, AFRIC = alphanumeric file identifier (only the 1 st 4 characters are read) I = node number in the ADCIRC grid FRIC(I) = linear or quadratic friction coefficient for node I NP = number of nodes in the ADCIRC grid NWP = the fort.1 file has the following format: AFRIC NBPNODES NBNNUM(I),BK(I),BALPHA(I),BDELX(I),POAN(I) (this line is repeated for I=1,NBPNODES) where, AFRIC = alphanumeric file identifier (only the 1 st 4 characters are read) NBPNODES = total number of nodes (centerline and adjacent) in ADCIRC grid used to represent the effects of bridge pilings NBNNUM(I) = node number in ADCIRC grid of node I used to represent the effects of bridge pilings BK(I) = pier shape factor (K - see Table 1) BALPHA(I) = fraction of the cross section occupied by all of the pilings in the bridge = sum of piling widths/width of cross section (corresponds to α in theory section above) BDELX(I) = approximate nodal spacing in the upstream/downstream direction in meters or feet depending on the grid coordinate system (for lon,lat coordinates, use meters for BDELX). (Note that s *BDELX if the piling effects are distributed across 3 nodes in the alongstream direction) POAN(I) = parameter that weights drag between adjacent and centerline nodes. = if node represents a centerline node = 1 if node represents an adjacent node 5

TEST CASE The implementation of the bridge piling algorithm has been tested in ADCIRC V34.19 using a simple rectangular channel of length 1 km, width km and depth 10 m. The channel was discretized using a uniform node placement with x= y =50 m yielding a grid with 49 nodes along the length and 9 nodes across the width. Flow along the length of the channel was driven by a steady inflow at one end and steady outflow at the other end with a discharge per unit width of 10 m s. The nominal velocity in the channel (discharge/depth) equals 1 m/s. An approximate solution to the water level change along the length of the channel in the absence of any bridge pilings (and neglecting the Coriolis force) can be obtained by a simple balance between the water level slope and the bottom friction: ( 0.005)( 1 ) ( 9.81)( 10) ζ d 5 CU = = =.548x10 x gh This yields a linear water surface slope along the length of the channel with a total water level drop over 1 km of 0.3058 m. Figure 1 presents the steady state water level profile along the channel centerline computed by ADCIRC. The total water level drop over 1 km is 0.3091 m. A second test case was then performed in which a bridge was assumed to cross the channel 6.5 km from the upstream end. Nine nodes were specified as centerline nodes and 18 nodes were specified as adjacent nodes. At each of these 7 nodes, BK=1.0, BALPHA=0.1 and Figure 1. Along channel water level profile computed by ADCIRC with and without bridge pilings. Results have been plotted at every grid point along the length of the channel. 6

Figure. Blow up of the along channel water level profile computed by ADCIRC with and without bridge pilings. Results have been plotted at every grid point in the vicinity of the bridge. BDELX=50, corresponding to a bridge with a piling shape factor of 1, the total area of pilings equal to 10 percent of the channel cross sectional width and a grid spacing of 50 m. Using Yarnell s equation ( Fr = 1 (9.81)(10) = 0.1019, K=1,α =0.1 ) gives a water level drop across the pilings of ζ =0.00467 m. Figures 1 and present the steady state water level profile along the channel centerline computed by ADCIRC. It is clear that the water level drop is increased due to the presence of the bridge pilings. The total water level drop along the channel in this run is 0.3133 m indicating that the pilings caused a water level drop in the ADCIRC run of 0.3133 0.3091 = 0.004 m. This value is approximately 10 percent below the Yarnell value. Near perfect agreement can be obtained by calibrating the numerical method by reducing BDELX to 90 percent of the nodal spacing (5 m). It is not know, however, whether this can be generalized to all applications. 7

REFERENCES Henderson, F.M., 1966, Open Channel Flow, MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, pp 65-67. Luettich, R.A. Jr., J.J. Westerink and N.W. Scheffner, 199, ADCIRC: An Advanced Three- Dimensional Circulation Model for Shelves, Coasts and Estuaries, Report 1: Theory and Methodology of ADCIRC-DDI and ADCIRC-3DL, DRP Technical Report DRP-9-6, Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS., November 199, 137p. Luettich, R.A., Jr. and J.J. Westerink, 1999, Elemental Wetting and Drying in the ADCIRC Hydrodynamic Model: Upgrades and Documentation for ADCIRC Version 34.XX, Contractors Report, department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, March 11, 1999, 8 p. Westerink, J.J., R.A. Luettich, Jr. and N.W. Scheffner, 1994, ADCIRC: An Advanced Three- Dimensional Circulation Model for Shelves, Coasts and Estuaries, Report : Users Manual for ADCIRC-DDI, DRP Technical Report DRP-9-6, Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS., January 1994, 156p. Yarnell, D.L., 1934a, Pile trestles as channel obstructions, U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Tech. Bull. 49. Yarnell, D.L., 1934b, Bridge piers as channel obstructions, U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Tech. Bull. 44. 8