Integration of non linear conservation laws?

Similar documents
Manifolds obtained by soldering together points, lines, etc.

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

Let F be a foliation of dimension p and codimension q on a smooth manifold of dimension n.

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

A PSEUDO-GROUP ISOMORPHISM BETWEEN CONTROL SYSTEMS AND CERTAIN GENERALIZED FINSLER STRUCTURES. Robert B. Gardner*, George R.

Manifolds in Fluid Dynamics

Properties of the boundary rg flow

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

Gravitation: Tensor Calculus

THE VORTEX EQUATION ON AFFINE MANIFOLDS. 1. Introduction

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

Divergence Theorems in Path Space. Denis Bell University of North Florida

H-projective structures and their applications

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

7 Curvature of a connection

Initial-Value Problems in General Relativity

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

THE GAUSS-BONNET THEOREM FOR VECTOR BUNDLES

Notes on torsion. Arkadiusz Jadczyk. October 11, 2010

Orientation transport

CONNECTIONS ON PRINCIPAL BUNDLES AND CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

Scalar Electrodynamics. The principle of local gauge invariance. Lower-degree conservation

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH

Poisson Equation on Closed Manifolds

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

Lecture 5. vector bundles, gauge theory

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

First structure equation

Parallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds. 1 Introduction. Andrei Moroianu 1

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

Compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

Tangent bundles, vector fields

Geometry of almost-product (pseudo-)riemannian manifold. manifolds and the dynamics of the observer. Aneta Wojnar

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURE 12-13,

Theorem 2. Let n 0 3 be a given integer. is rigid in the sense of Guillemin, so are all the spaces ḠR n,n, with n n 0.

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES

TWISTOR AND KILLING FORMS IN RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

CS 468. Differential Geometry for Computer Science. Lecture 17 Surface Deformation

Brownian Motion on Manifold

Minimal timelike surfaces in a certain homogeneous Lorentzian 3-manifold II

RESEARCH STATEMENT YUHAO HU

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

5 Constructions of connections

1 First and second variational formulas for area

Conification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergr

1 Introduction: connections and fiber bundles

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

WICK ROTATIONS AND HOLOMORPHIC RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Rank Three Tensors in Unified Gravitation and Electrodynamics

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

TRANSVERSE LS-CATEGORY FOR RIEMANNIAN FOLIATIONS

Affine Connections: Part 2

Formality of Kähler manifolds

INTRO TO SUBRIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

THE INITIAL VALUE FORMULATION OF GENERAL RELATIVITY

TENSORS AND DIFFERENTIAL FORMS

Extensions of Lorentzian spacetime geometry

Compact Riemannian manifolds with exceptional holonomy

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

4.7 The Levi-Civita connection and parallel transport

Geometry of Horizontal Bundles and Connections

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39)

Extensions of Lorentzian spacetime geometry

RIGIDITY OF STATIONARY BLACK HOLES WITH SMALL ANGULAR MOMENTUM ON THE HORIZON

Mathematical Relativity, Spring 2017/18 Instituto Superior Técnico

Representation theory and the X-ray transform

THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009

Conservation Theorem of Einstein Cartan Evans Field Theory

Vortex Equations on Riemannian Surfaces

Submanifolds of. Total Mean Curvature and. Finite Type. Bang-Yen Chen. Series in Pure Mathematics Volume. Second Edition.

A local characterization for constant curvature metrics in 2-dimensional Lorentz manifolds

Brane Gravity from Bulk Vector Field

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

Observer dependent background geometries arxiv:

Differential Geometry II Lecture 1: Introduction and Motivation

Physics 236a assignment, Week 2:

Self-dual conformal gravity

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 12 Oct 2012

Singular foliations, examples and constructions

New conformal gauging and the electromagnetic theory of Weyl

Solvable Lie groups and the shear construction

A Joint Adventure in Sasakian and Kähler Geometry

Geometry 9: Serre-Swan theorem

Transcription:

Integration of non linear conservation laws? Frédéric Hélein, Institut Mathématique de Jussieu, Paris 7 Advances in Surface Theory, Leicester, June 13, 2013

Harmonic maps Let (M, g) be an oriented Riemannian manifold of dimension m. Let (N, h) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension n. A map u : M N is harmonic if g u i + Γ i jk [h](u) αu j β u k g αβ = 0. Alternatively: d u ( du) = 0, where is the Hodge operator: T M Λ m 1 T M;

Harmonic maps Let (M, g) be an oriented Riemannian manifold of dimension m. Let (N, h) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension n. A map u : M N is harmonic if g u i + Γ i jk [h](u) αu j β u k g αβ = 0. Alternatively: d u ( du) = 0, where is the Hodge operator: T M Λ m 1 T M; du is an (m 1)-form with values in u T N, where u T N := the vector bundle over M whose fiber at x is T u(x) N.

Harmonic maps Let (M, g) be an oriented Riemannian manifold of dimension m. Let (N, h) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension n. A map u : M N is harmonic if g u i + Γ i jk [h](u) αu j β u k g αβ = 0. Alternatively: d u ( du) = 0, where is the Hodge operator: T M Λ m 1 T M; du is an (m 1)-form with values in u T N, where u T N := the vector bundle over M whose fiber at x is T u(x) N. u is the pull-back image by u of the Levi-Civita connection on T N ;

Harmonic maps Let (M, g) be an oriented Riemannian manifold of dimension m. Let (N, h) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension n. A map u : M N is harmonic if g u i + Γ i jk [h](u) αu j β u k g αβ = 0. Alternatively: d u ( du) = 0, where is the Hodge operator: T M Λ m 1 T M; du is an (m 1)-form with values in u T N, where u T N := the vector bundle over M whose fiber at x is T u(x) N. u is the pull-back image by u of the Levi-Civita connection on T N ; d u is the covariant differential with respect to u.

Integration of the harmonic maps equation Question: can we integrate equation d u ( du) = 0,? Example (use of Noether theorem): assume N = S n, the round sphere in R n+1. Then the harmonic map equation reads: g u + u 2 u = 0. But it can also be written (denoting u du = (u i du j u j du i ) ij ): d( u du) = 0 = u du = db, where b : M is a (m 2)-form with values in so(n + 1). What can we do in the general case?

Energy-momentum tensor Let (M, g) be a m-dimensional (pseudo-)riemannian manifold and T = T µ ν µ dx ν be a tensor. Assume that: Can we integrate this equation? Difficult question. µ T µ ν = 0, This problem is of the same type as the preceding one (harmonic maps). Consider τ := T µ ν ( µ vol g ) dx ν, an (m 1)-form with values in T M (i.e. a section of (Λ m 1 T M) T M). Then condition µ T µ ν = 0 is equivalent to: d τ = 0.

A general framework Let M be an m-dimensional manifold; This gives us a data (M, V, g,, ϕ). We say that (M, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable if Problem: integrate ϕ, i.e. find d ϕ = 0.

A general framework Let M be an m-dimensional manifold; let V be a rank n vector bundle over M; This gives us a data (M, V, g,, ϕ). We say that (M, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable if Problem: integrate ϕ, i.e. find d ϕ = 0.

A general framework Let M be an m-dimensional manifold; let V be a rank n vector bundle over M; let g be a metric on V ; This gives us a data (M, V, g,, ϕ). We say that (M, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable if Problem: integrate ϕ, i.e. find d ϕ = 0.

A general framework Let M be an m-dimensional manifold; let V be a rank n vector bundle over M; let g be a metric on V ; let be a connection on V which respects the metric g; This gives us a data (M, V, g,, ϕ). We say that (M, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable if Problem: integrate ϕ, i.e. find d ϕ = 0.

A general framework Let M be an m-dimensional manifold; let V be a rank n vector bundle over M; let g be a metric on V ; let be a connection on V which respects the metric g; let ϕ be a p-form on M with values in V. This gives us a data (M, V, g,, ϕ). We say that (M, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable if Problem: integrate ϕ, i.e. find d ϕ = 0.

A general framework Let M be an m-dimensional manifold; let V be a rank n vector bundle over M; let g be a metric on V ; let be a connection on V which respects the metric g; let ϕ be a p-form on M with values in V. This gives us a data (M, V, g,, ϕ). We say that (M, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable if Problem: integrate ϕ, i.e. find d ϕ = 0. a geometric framework where this make sense;

A general framework Let M be an m-dimensional manifold; let V be a rank n vector bundle over M; let g be a metric on V ; let be a connection on V which respects the metric g; let ϕ be a p-form on M with values in V. This gives us a data (M, V, g,, ϕ). We say that (M, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable if Problem: integrate ϕ, i.e. find d ϕ = 0. a geometric framework where this make sense; a way to integrate in this setting.

Embedding of a covariant conservation law Consider the following problem: Let (M, V, g,, ϕ) be integrable. In particular d ϕ = 0. Find N N and a fiber bundle embedding s.t. T : V M R N (x, v) (x, T x (v)) x M, T x is an isometric embedding of (V x, g x ) in (R N,, ); Here T ϕ is the p-form on M with values in R N s.t. x M, (T ϕ) x is obtained by the composition (T x M) p V x R N (v 1,, v p ) ϕ x (v 1,, v p ) T x [ϕ x (v 1,, v p )]

Embedding of a covariant conservation law Consider the following problem: Let (M, V, g,, ϕ) be integrable. In particular d ϕ = 0. Find N N and a fiber bundle embedding s.t. T : V M R N (x, v) (x, T x (v)) x M, T x is an isometric embedding of (V x, g x ) in (R N,, ); T ϕ is closed. Here T ϕ is the p-form on M with values in R N s.t. x M, (T ϕ) x is obtained by the composition (T x M) p V x R N (v 1,, v p ) ϕ x (v 1,, v p ) T x [ϕ x (v 1,, v p )]

Formulation using moving frame Let e 1,, e n be (local) sections of V s.t. x M, (e 1 (x),, e n (x)) is an orthonormal basis of V x (a moving frame). Then is encoded in the connection 1-forms ω a b s.t. e a = e b ω a b ;

Formulation using moving frame Let e 1,, e n be (local) sections of V s.t. x M, (e 1 (x),, e n (x)) is an orthonormal basis of V x (a moving frame). Then is encoded in the connection 1-forms ω a b s.t. e a = e b ω a b ; ϕ is encoded by p-forms ϕ a s.t. ϕ = e a ϕ a ;

Formulation using moving frame Let e 1,, e n be (local) sections of V s.t. x M, (e 1 (x),, e n (x)) is an orthonormal basis of V x (a moving frame). Then is encoded in the connection 1-forms ω a b s.t. e a = e b ω a b ; ϕ is encoded by p-forms ϕ a s.t. ϕ = e a ϕ a ; equation d ϕ = 0 reads: dϕ a + ω a b ϕb = 0, 1 a, b n.

Formulation using moving frame Let e 1,, e n be (local) sections of V s.t. x M, (e 1 (x),, e n (x)) is an orthonormal basis of V x (a moving frame). Then is encoded in the connection 1-forms ω a b s.t. e a = e b ω a b ; ϕ is encoded by p-forms ϕ a s.t. ϕ = e a ϕ a ; equation d ϕ = 0 reads: dϕ a + ω a b ϕb = 0, 1 a, b n. If T : V M R N and E a := T x (e a ), T ϕ = T (e a ϕ a ) = E a ϕ a ;

Formulation using moving frame Let e 1,, e n be (local) sections of V s.t. x M, (e 1 (x),, e n (x)) is an orthonormal basis of V x (a moving frame). Then is encoded in the connection 1-forms ω a b s.t. e a = e b ω a b ; ϕ is encoded by p-forms ϕ a s.t. ϕ = e a ϕ a ; equation d ϕ = 0 reads: dϕ a + ω a b ϕb = 0, 1 a, b n. If T : V M R N and E a := T x (e a ), T ϕ = T (e a ϕ a ) = E a ϕ a ; and d(t ϕ) = 0 reads: dϕ a + ω a b ϕb = 0 and ω i b ϕb = 0, i > n (here (E 1,, E n, E n+1,, E N ) is an orthonormal basis of R N and ω α β := de β, E α.

Example: harmonic maps into the sphere revisited Consider again u : M S n and du: an (m 1)-form with values in u TS n M R n+1. Then setting T : u TS n M so(n + 1) (x, v) (x, u(x) v) we have: u harmonic d(tu) = 0.

Source of inspiration: the isometric embedding problem Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. Find N N and an isometric embedding of (M, g) in the Euclidean vector space (R N,, ), i.e. a map u : M R N s.t. g µν = µ u, ν u. Observation: let ϕ be the 1-form on M with values on T M defined by: x M, ϕ x := identity map: T x M T x M. ϕ is the soldering form. Then d ϕ = 0 because the Levi-Civita connection is torsion free.

The isometric embedding problem (alternative formulation) Hence (M, T M, g, ϕ) is integrable! Let u : M R N be an isometric embedding (Cartan Kähler, Nash,...), then du x = du x ϕ x, so if we let then: T := (Id M, du) : T M M R N, du = T ϕ (= d(t ϕ) = 0) and T is a solution of our problem.

A local result Theorem [Nabil KAHOUADJI, arxiv:0804.2608] Assume p = m 1, let (M, V, g,, ϕ) be integrable and real analytic. Assume that ϕ has a constant rank. Then for each x M, there exists a neighbourhood O of x and a real analytic map of vector bundles T : V O O R n+(m 1)(n 1) s.t. T is isometric and d(t ϕ) = 0. The proof uses the Cartan Kähler theory. Example: if m = n = 4 and p = 3 and ϕ = τ = energy-momentum tensor, T τ is a closed 3-form with values in R 13. Hence T τ = du, where U is a 2-form. The case 1 < p < m 1 is open.

Some remarks This does not answer the question of integrating ϕ in a concrete way: if ϕ = τ = energy-momentum, then the numerical values of U (s.t. du = T τ) has no physical meaning;

Some remarks This does not answer the question of integrating ϕ in a concrete way: if ϕ = τ = energy-momentum, then the numerical values of U (s.t. du = T τ) has no physical meaning; (However this may be useful in the context of harmonic maps;)

Some remarks This does not answer the question of integrating ϕ in a concrete way: if ϕ = τ = energy-momentum, then the numerical values of U (s.t. du = T τ) has no physical meaning; (However this may be useful in the context of harmonic maps;) Main lesson: we should consider the problem the other way around, i.e. contemplate the geometry behind the data (M, V, g,, ϕ).

Postulates (or credo) There is a geometry associated to each integrable data (M, V, g,, ϕ);

Postulates (or credo) There is a geometry associated to each integrable data (M, V, g,, ϕ); For an arbitrary p, in this geometry, the elementary objects are (p 1)-dimensional.

Postulates (or credo) There is a geometry associated to each integrable data (M, V, g,, ϕ); For an arbitrary p, in this geometry, the elementary objects are (p 1)-dimensional. We call an integrable data (M, V, g,, ϕ) a (p 1)-puzzle;

Postulates (or credo) There is a geometry associated to each integrable data (M, V, g,, ϕ); For an arbitrary p, in this geometry, the elementary objects are (p 1)-dimensional. We call an integrable data (M, V, g,, ϕ) a (p 1)-puzzle; The condition d ϕ = 0 is an analogue of a torsion free condition;.

Functorial remarks If (N, V, g,, ϕ) is a (p 1)-puzzle and if u : M N is a smooth map, we define the pull-back image of (N, V, g,, ϕ) by u to be the (p 1)-puzzle: u (N, V, g,, ϕ) := (M, u V, u g, u, ϕ du). Then if (N, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable, u (N, V, g,, ϕ) is integrable.

The case p = 1 We assume that the rank of ϕ is constant, equal to k. if m = k = n, then ϕ x is a vector space isomorphim, which induces an isomorphism T M V. Through this isomorphism g gives a Riemannian metric on M and the Levi-Civita connection;

The case p = 1 We assume that the rank of ϕ is constant, equal to k. if m = k = n, then ϕ x is a vector space isomorphim, which induces an isomorphism T M V. Through this isomorphism g gives a Riemannian metric on M and the Levi-Civita connection; if m = k < n, then ϕ x is injective, its image H x := ϕ x (T x M) is a subpsace of V x, which induces a vector subbundle H of V. Then we can identify (M, V, g,, ϕ) with a Riemannian manifold together with a (formal) second fundamental form in an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (modelled on the total space of the normal bundle H in V );

The case p = 1 We assume that the rank of ϕ is constant, equal to k. if m = k = n, then ϕ x is a vector space isomorphim, which induces an isomorphism T M V. Through this isomorphism g gives a Riemannian metric on M and the Levi-Civita connection; if m = k < n, then ϕ x is injective, its image H x := ϕ x (T x M) is a subpsace of V x, which induces a vector subbundle H of V. Then we can identify (M, V, g,, ϕ) with a Riemannian manifold together with a (formal) second fundamental form in an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (modelled on the total space of the normal bundle H in V ); if m > k = n, then ϕ x is onto but has a nontrivial kernel the most interesting case...

The case p = 1 and m > k = n Consider K x := Kerϕ x, it gives a rank m n distribution.

The case p = 1 and m > k = n Consider K x := Kerϕ x, it gives a rank m n distribution. This distribution is integrable because of: dϕ a = ω a b ϕb and by Frobenius Theorem. Hence there exists (locally) a foliation of M by (m n)-dimensional submanifolds Σ on which ϕ vanishes.

The case p = 1 and m > k = n Consider K x := Kerϕ x, it gives a rank m n distribution. This distribution is integrable because of: dϕ a = ω a b ϕb and by Frobenius Theorem. Hence there exists (locally) a foliation of M by (m n)-dimensional submanifolds Σ on which ϕ vanishes. The restriction of the connection on each leaves Σ of the foliation is flat!

The case p = 1 and m > k = n Consider K x := Kerϕ x, it gives a rank m n distribution. This distribution is integrable because of: dϕ a = ω a b ϕb and by Frobenius Theorem. Hence there exists (locally) a foliation of M by (m n)-dimensional submanifolds Σ on which ϕ vanishes. The restriction of the connection on each leaves Σ of the foliation is flat! Actually we can construct locally a metric g on M/Σ (the quotient by the foliation) s.t. (M, V, g,, ϕ) is the pull-back image by the projection M M/Σ of (M/Σ, T (M/Σ), g,, solder).

Idea of the proof Let X and Y be two vector fields on M s.t. ϕ(x ) = 0 and [X, Y ] = 0. Then dϕ a (X, Y ) = X ϕ a (Y ) Y ϕ a (X ) ϕ a ([X, Y ]) = X ϕ a (Y ) 0 0, and ω a b ϕb (X, Y ) = ω a b (X )ϕb (Y ) ω a b (Y )ϕb (X ) = ω a b (X )ϕb (Y ) 0. Thus 0 = (dϕ a + ω a b ϕb )(X, Y ) = X ϕ a (Y ) + ω a b (X )ϕb (Y ) = ( X ϕ(y )) a. Hence the restriction of ϕ(y ) to a leaf is paralell. Lastly we can construct a family (Y 1,, Y n ) of such vector fields, s.t. (ϕ(y 1 ),, ϕ(y n )) is a paralell frame on Σ.

Isometric embedding of 0-puzzles Using the preceding we can embedd isometrically locally any 0-puzzle (M, V, g,, ϕ) if ϕ has a constant k. We consider the foliation by leaves Σ which are tangent to the distribution kerϕ and construct a Riemannian manifold (N, h) of dimension n s.t. (M, V, g,, ϕ) is the pull-back of (N, T N, h, [h], solder) by the isometric maps: (M, g) onto (M/Σ, g) injective (N, h) Lastly one can embedd isometrically (N, h) (R N,, ). Then (M, V, g,, ϕ) is the pull-back of (R N, T R N,,, d, Id) by the composition of these maps. The differential of this map gives an isometric embedding of (M, V, g,, ϕ).

For p > 1? Largely open Try to understand known examples and results: the isometric embedding result of N. Kahouadji for p = m 1;

For p > 1? Largely open Try to understand known examples and results: the isometric embedding result of N. Kahouadji for p = m 1; the soldering 1-form on a Riemannian manifold is the differential of the identity map from the fluid M to the rigid (M, g);

For p > 1? Largely open Try to understand known examples and results: the isometric embedding result of N. Kahouadji for p = m 1; the soldering 1-form on a Riemannian manifold is the differential of the identity map from the fluid M to the rigid (M, g); the curvature 2-form Ω satisfies the Bianchi identity (dω + [ω Ω] = 0) and is exact as being dω + 1 2 [ω ω];

For p > 1? Largely open Try to understand known examples and results: the isometric embedding result of N. Kahouadji for p = m 1; the soldering 1-form on a Riemannian manifold is the differential of the identity map from the fluid M to the rigid (M, g); the curvature 2-form Ω satisfies the Bianchi identity (dω + [ω Ω] = 0) and is exact as being dω + 1 2 [ω ω]; on a 4-dimensional manifold, if τ is the stress-energy tensor, solving the Einstein equation R µν s 2 g µν = T µν amounts to find a soldering 1-form α s.t. 1 2 ɛ λµνσω λµ α ν = τ σ. The left hand side looks roughly like the exterior product of two exact forms.

Further questions integrate d ( F ) = 0 (Yang Mills);

Further questions integrate d ( F ) = 0 (Yang Mills); would it mayful useful for string theory, branes theory?

References F. Hélein, Applications harmoniques, lois de conservation et repères mobiles, Diderot eds., 1996; Harmonic maps, conservation laws and moving frames, Cambridge, 2001. N. Kahouadji, Construction of local conservation laws by generalized isometric embeddings of vector bundles, arxiv:0804.2608. F. Hélein, Manifolds obtained by soldering together points, lines, etc., in Geometry, topology, quantum field theory and cosmology, C. Barbachoux, J. Kouneiher, F. Hélein, eds, collection Travaux en Cours (Physique-Mathématiques), Hermann 2009, p. 23 43.