A density theorem for parameterized differential Galois theory

Similar documents
Generic Picard-Vessiot extensions for connected by finite groups Kolchin Seminar in Differential Algebra October 22nd, 2005

Tutorial on Differential Galois Theory III

On the structure of Picard-Vessiot extensions - Joint work with Arne Ledet - Kolchin Seminar in Differential Algebra May 06, 2006

Linear Algebraic Groups as Parameterized Picard-Vessiot Galois Groups

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

Symmetries of meromorphic connections over Riemann Surfaces

Profinite Groups. Hendrik Lenstra. 1. Introduction

Differential Groups and Differential Relations. Michael F. Singer Department of Mathematics North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC USA

Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

Liouvillian solutions of third order differential equations

Inverse Galois Problem for C(t)

ON THE CONSTRUCTIVE INVERSE PROBLEM IN DIFFERENTIAL GALOIS THEORY #

Picard-Vessiot theory, algebraic groups and group schemes

Hyperelliptic Jacobians in differential Galois theory (preliminary report)

Trace fields of knots

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

ON GENERALIZED HYPERGEOMETRIC EQUATIONS AND MIRROR MAPS

z, w = z 1 w 1 + z 2 w 2 z, w 2 z 2 w 2. d([z], [w]) = 2 φ : P(C 2 ) \ [1 : 0] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 1 z 2 ψ : P(C 2 ) \ [0 : 1] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 2 z 1

Galois Correspondence Theorem for Picard-Vessiot Extensions

Mathematical Research Letters 3, (1996) EQUIVARIANT AFFINE LINE BUNDLES AND LINEARIZATION. Hanspeter Kraft and Frank Kutzschebauch

Curtis Heberle MTH 189 Final Paper 12/14/2010. Algebraic Groups

Correction to On Satake parameters for representations with parahoric fixed vectors

REMARKS ON THE INTRINSIC INVERSE PROBLEM. Daniel BERTRAND Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Metabelian Galois Representations

Demushkin s Theorem in Codimension One

Variations on a Theme: Fields of Definition, Fields of Moduli, Automorphisms, and Twists

TOPOLOGICAL GALOIS THEORY. A. Khovanskii

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

Topological approach to 13th Hilbert problem

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

THE QUANTUM CONNECTION

Math 210C. A non-closed commutator subgroup

Problem 4 (Wed Jan 29) Let G be a finite abelian group. Prove that the following are equivalent

On the renormalization problem of multiple zeta values

On the Definitions of Difference Galois Groups

What is the Langlands program all about?

Linear-fractionally-induced Composition. Operators

Part II. Riemann Surfaces. Year

Structure of Compact Quantum Groups A u (Q) and B u (Q) and their Isomorphism Classification

Di erentially Closed Fields

Differential Central Simple Algebras and Picard Vessiot Representations

l-adic Representations

An algorithm for solving second order linear homogeneous differential equations

Residual modular Galois representations: images and applications

HIGHER HOLONOMY OF FORMAL HOMOLOGY CONNECTIONS AND BRAID COBORDISMS

Classification of Algebraic Subgroups of Lower Order Unipotent Algebraic Groups

Commutative nilpotent rings and Hopf Galois structures

8 8 THE RIEMANN MAPPING THEOREM. 8.1 Simply Connected Surfaces

Limits in differential fields of holomorphic germs

San Francisco State University

On values of Modular Forms at Algebraic Points

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

THE GALOIS CORRESPONDENCE FOR LINEAR HOMOGENEOUS DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

Existence of a Picard-Vessiot extension

Spring 2018 CIS 610. Advanced Geometric Methods in Computer Science Jean Gallier Homework 3

Riemann-Hilbert problems from Donaldson-Thomas theory

ENDOMORPHISMS AND BIJECTIONS OF THE CHARACTER

Universal Covers and Category Theory in Polynomial and Differential Galois Theory

On combinatorial zeta functions

µ INVARIANT OF NANOPHRASES YUKA KOTORII TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 1. Introduction A word will be a sequ

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

COMPLEX ANALYSIS-II HOMEWORK

ENTRY GROUP THEORY. [ENTRY GROUP THEORY] Authors: started Mark Lezama: October 2003 Literature: Algebra by Michael Artin, Mathworld.

Local Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture

Real representations

A COMPUTATION OF MINIMAL POLYNOMIALS OF SPECIAL VALUES OF SIEGEL MODULAR FUNCTIONS

Lecture 4.1: Homomorphisms and isomorphisms

p-divisible Groups and the Chromatic Filtration

Lecture III. Five Lie Algebras

Reductive group actions and some problems concerning their quotients

Differential Algebra and Related Topics

Arboreal Cantor Actions

THE TATE MODULE. Seminar: Elliptic curves and the Weil conjecture. Yassin Mousa. Z p

Weil-étale Cohomology

Langlands parameters of quivers in the Sato Grassmannian

IIT Mumbai 2015 MA 419, Basic Algebra Tutorial Sheet-1

STRUCTURE THEORY OF UNIMODULAR LATTICES

ON THE MATRIX EQUATION XA AX = τ(x)

Res + X F F + is defined below in (1.3). According to [Je-Ki2, Definition 3.3 and Proposition 3.4], the value of Res + X

The Hilbert-Mumford Criterion

The Yang-Mills equations over Klein surfaces

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups

Real and p-adic Picard-Vessiot fields

Noetherian property of infinite EI categories

Galois fields in quantum mechanics A. Vourdas University of Bradford

The 3-local cohomology of the Mathieu group M 24

Projective Quantum Spaces

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

Descent for differential Galois theory of difference equations Confluence and q-dependency

CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK Motivation

Computing modular polynomials in dimension 2 ECC 2015, Bordeaux

On orderability of fibred knot groups

Fields and Galois Theory

Sylow subgroups of GL(3,q)

Riemann surfaces with extra automorphisms and endomorphism rings of their Jacobians

Representations and Linear Actions

Transcription:

A density theorem for parameterized differential Galois theory Thomas Dreyfus University Paris 7 The Kolchin Seminar in Differential Algebra, 31/01/2014, New York.

In this talk, we are interested in the differential equations on the form: z Y (z, t) = A(z, t)y (z, t), (1) where t = t 1,..., t n is a parameter, A M m (O U ({z})) and O U ({z}) is a ring we will define later. We want to define a parameterized differential Galois group for (1) and, analogously to the density theorem of Ramis, give a set of topological generators.

In this talk, we are interested in the differential equations on the form: z Y (z, t) = A(z, t)y (z, t), (1) where t = t 1,..., t n is a parameter, A M m (O U ({z})) and O U ({z}) is a ring we will define later. We want to define a parameterized differential Galois group for (1) and, analogously to the density theorem of Ramis, give a set of topological generators.

1 Parameterized Hukuhara-Turrittin theorem 2 3 4 5

Let U be a polydisc of C n. Let M U be the field fo meromorphic function on U. ˆK U := M U ((z)). O U ({z}) := { f i (t)z i ˆK U t U, z fi (t)z i is a germ of meromorphic function}. K U := Frac(O U ({z})).

Proposition There exist U U and ν N, such that we have an invertible matrix solution of (1) of the form: where Remark F (z, t) := Ĥ(z, t)el(t) log(z) e Q(z,t), Ĥ(z, t) GL m ( ˆK U [z 1/ν ]). L(t) M m (M U ). Q(z, t) := Diag(q i (z, t)), with q i (z, t) z 1/ν M U [z 1/ν ]. If we restrict U, we may assume that U = U.

Proposition There exist U U and ν N, such that we have an invertible matrix solution of (1) of the form: where Remark F (z, t) := Ĥ(z, t)el(t) log(z) e Q(z,t), Ĥ(z, t) GL m ( ˆK U [z 1/ν ]). L(t) M m (M U ). Q(z, t) := Diag(q i (z, t)), with q i (z, t) z 1/ν M U [z 1/ν ]. If we restrict U, we may assume that U = U.

Let t := { t1,..., tn }. We still consider (1) with the fundamental solution F (z, t) given by the parameterized Hukuhara-Turrittin theorem. Let K U be the ( z, t )-differential field generated by K U and the entries of F (z, t). Proposition K U K U is a parameterized Picard-Vessiot extension of (1), i.e, the field of the z -constants of K U is M U.

( ) Let Aut t KU z K U be the group of field automorphism of K U that commutes with all the derivations and that let K U invariant. Let us consider the representation: ρ F : ( ) Aut t KU z K U GL m (M U ) ϕ F 1 ϕ(f ). Theorem The image of ρ F is a differential subgroup of GL m (M U ), i.e, there exist P 1,..., P k, t -differential polynomials in coefficients in M U, such that: (A i,j ) ρ F (Aut t z ) P 1 (A i,j ) = = P k (A i,j ) = 0.

We define the Kolchin topology as the topology of GL m (M U ) in which closed sets are zero sets of differential algebraic polynomials in coefficients in M U. Proposition Let G be a subgroup of Aut t z ( KU K U ). If K U G = KU, then G is dense for Kolchin topology in Aut t z ( KU K U ).

We still consider (1) with parameterized Picard-Vessiot extension K U K U and with Galois group Aut t z ( KU K U ). Definition We define ˆm Aut t z ( KU K U ) by: ˆm ˆKU = Id. ˆm(z α ) = e 2iπα z α. ˆm(log(z)) = log(z) + 2iπ. q z 1/ν M U [z 1/ν ], ˆm(e q ) = e ˆm(q).

Definition We define ( the) exponential torus as the subgroup of Aut t KU z K U of elements τ that satisfies: τ ˆKU = Id. τ(z α ) = z α. τ(log(z)) = log(z). There exists α τ, a character of z 1/ν M U [z 1/ν ], such that q z 1/ν M U [z 1/ν ], τ(e q ) = α τ (q)e q.

Example Let us consider z 2 z Y (z) + Y (z) = z. (2)

Example Let us consider z 2 z Y (z) + Y (z) = z. (2) The formal power series h(z) = n 0( 1) n n!z n+1 is solution of (2).

Example Let us consider z 2 z Y (z) + Y (z) = z. (2) Let d (2Z + 1)π. The following function is solution of (2) where f (ζ) = 1 1+ζ S d (h) = e id 0 ( f (ζ)e ζ ) dζ, z

Example Let us consider z 2 z Y (z) + Y (z) = z. (2) S d (h) is 1-Gevrey asymptotic to h: N Sd (h) ( 1) n n!z n+1 AN+1 (N + 1)! z N+1, n 0 where A > 0 is a constant.

Let d R and let k Q >0. ˆB k ( a n z n ) = L d 1 (f ) (z) = e id L d k := ρ k L d 1 ρ 1/k. 0 a n Γ(n/k) ζn. f (ζ) ( )dζ. ze ζ z

Let us consider h(z) C[[z]] solution of a linear differential equation in coefficients germs of meromorphic functions. There exist Σ R (set of singular directions), (κ 1,..., κ r ) ( Q >0) r, such that if d / Σ, S d (h) = L d κ r L d κ 1 ˆB κ1 ˆB κr (h), is a germ of analytic solution on the sector arg(z) ]d π/2κ r, d + π/2κ r [. Σ is finite modulo 2πZ. The map h S d (h) induces a morphism of differential field.

Let us consider h(z) C[[z]] solution of a linear differential equation in coefficients germs of meromorphic functions. There exist Σ R (set of singular directions), (κ 1,..., κ r ) ( Q >0) r, such that if d / Σ, S d (h) = L d κ r L d κ 1 ˆB κ1 ˆB κr (h), is a germ of analytic solution on the sector arg(z) ]d π/2κ r, d + π/2κ r [. Σ is finite modulo 2πZ. The map h S d (h) induces a morphism of differential field.

Let us consider h(z) C[[z]] solution of a linear differential equation in coefficients germs of meromorphic functions. There exist Σ R (set of singular directions), (κ 1,..., κ r ) ( Q >0) r, such that if d / Σ, S d (h) = L d κ r L d κ 1 ˆB κ1 ˆB κr (h), is a germ of analytic solution on the sector arg(z) ]d π/2κ r, d + π/2κ r [. Σ is finite modulo 2πZ. The map h S d (h) induces a morphism of differential field.

Let us consider h(z) C[[z]] solution of a linear differential equation in coefficients germs of meromorphic functions. There exist Σ R (set of singular directions), (κ 1,..., κ r ) ( Q >0) r, such that if d / Σ, S d (h) = L d κ r L d κ 1 ˆB κ1 ˆB κr (h), is a germ of analytic solution on the sector arg(z) ]d π/2κ r, d + π/2κ r [. Σ is finite modulo 2πZ. The map h S d (h) induces a morphism of differential field.

Let us consider system z Y (z) = A(z)Y (z) with coefficients that are germs of meromorphic functions. Let Ĥ(z)eL log(z) e Q(z) be the Hukuhara-Turrittin solution of z Y (z) = A(z)Y (z). There exist Σ R finite modulo 2π, ε > 0, such that if d / Σ, S d (Ĥ(z) ) e L log(z) e Q(z) is solution of z Y (z) = A(z)Y (z) with entries that are germs of meromorphic functions on the sector arg(z) ]d π/2ε, d + π/2ε[.

Let us consider system z Y (z) = A(z)Y (z) with coefficients that are germs of meromorphic functions. Let Ĥ(z)eL log(z) e Q(z) be the Hukuhara-Turrittin solution of z Y (z) = A(z)Y (z). There exist Σ R finite modulo 2π, ε > 0, such that if d / Σ, S d (Ĥ(z) ) e L log(z) e Q(z) is solution of z Y (z) = A(z)Y (z) with entries that are germs of meromorphic functions on the sector arg(z) ]d π/2ε, d + π/2ε[.

For d R, let St d GL m (C) such that: ( ) ( ) S d Ĥ(z) e L log(z) e Q(z) = S d + Ĥ(z) e L log(z) e Q(z) St d, where d π/2ε < d < d < d + < d + π/2ε and [d, d[ ]d, d + ] Σ =.

Let us consider (1). Let Ĥ(z, t)el(t) log(z) e Q(z,t) be parameterized Hukuhara-Turrittin solution. If we restrict U, we may assume that: There exist (d i (t)) continuous in t and finite modulo 2πZ, that satisfies d i (t) < d i+1 (t). (κ 1,i,j,..., κ r,i,j ) ( Q >0) r, such that for all d(t) continuous in t that does not interect Σ t := d i (t), we have an analytic solution of (1): ) S (Ĥ(z, d(t) t) e L(t) log(z) e Q(z,t) := ) L d(t) κ r,i,j L d(t) κ 1,i,j ˆB κ1,i,j ˆB κr,i,j (Ĥi,j (z, t) e L(t) log(z) e Q(z,t),.

Let us consider (1). Let Ĥ(z, t)el(t) log(z) e Q(z,t) be parameterized Hukuhara-Turrittin solution. If we restrict U, we may assume that: There exist (d i (t)) continuous in t and finite modulo 2πZ, that satisfies d i (t) < d i+1 (t). (κ 1,i,j,..., κ r,i,j ) ( Q >0) r, such that for all d(t) continuous in t that does not interect Σ t := d i (t), we have an analytic solution of (1): ) S (Ĥ(z, d(t) t) e L(t) log(z) e Q(z,t) := ) L d(t) κ r,i,j L d(t) κ 1,i,j ˆB κ1,i,j ˆB κr,i,j (Ĥi,j (z, t) e L(t) log(z) e Q(z,t),.

For d(t) Σ t continuous in t, let t St d(t) GL m (M U ) such that for all t 0 U, St d(t 0) GL m (C), is the Stokes matrix in the direction t 0 of z Y (z, t 0 ) = A(z, t 0 )Y (z, t 0 ). Proposition St d(t) Aut t z ( KU K U ).

For d(t) Σ t continuous in t, let t St d(t) GL m (M U ) such that for all t 0 U, St d(t 0) GL m (C), is the Stokes matrix in the direction t 0 of z Y (z, t 0 ) = A(z, t 0 )Y (z, t 0 ). Proposition St d(t) Aut t z ( KU K U ).

Let us consider (1). Let K U K U be the ( parameterized ) Picard-Vessiot extension and Aut t KU z K U be the Galois group. Theorem (D) The group generated by the (parameterized) monodromy matrix, the exponential torus and the Stokes matrices is dense for Kolchin topology in Aut t z ( KU K U ).

Let us consider z Y (z, t) = A(z, t)y (z, t) with A M m (M U (z)). We can define, MU (z) M ( U (z), parameterized ) Picard-Vessiot extension and Aut t MU z (z) M U (z) the Galois group. Theorem (D) The group generated by the (parameterized) monodromy matrix, the exponential torus and the Stokes matrices of all the singularities is dense for Kolchin topology in Aut t z ( ) MU (z) M U (z).

Definition ) Let t0 := z. Let A 0 M m (M U (z). We say that the linear differential equation t0 Y = A 0 Y ) is completely integrable if there exist A 1,..., A n M m (M U (z) such that, for all 0 i, j n, ti A j tj A i = A i A j A j A i.

Theorem (Cassidy/Singer 1 2, D 1 3) We have the equivalence: 1 t0 Y = A 0 Y is completely integrable. 2 The parameterized differential Galois group of t0 Y = A 0 Y is conjugated to an algebraic subgroup of GL m (C). 3 The topological generator of the parameterized differential Galois group of t0 Y = A 0 Y are conjugated to constant matrices.

Theorem (Cassidy/Singer 1 2, D 1 3) We have the equivalence: 1 t0 Y = A 0 Y is completely integrable. 2 The parameterized differential Galois group of t0 Y = A 0 Y is conjugated to an algebraic subgroup of GL m (C). 3 The topological generator of the parameterized differential Galois group of t0 Y = A 0 Y are conjugated to constant matrices.

Theorem (Cassidy/Singer 1 2, D 1 3) We have the equivalence: 1 t0 Y = A 0 Y is completely integrable. 2 The parameterized differential Galois group of t0 Y = A 0 Y is conjugated to an algebraic subgroup of GL m (C). 3 The topological generator of the parameterized differential Galois group of t0 Y = A 0 Y are conjugated to constant matrices.

Definition We say that k is a so-called universal t -field, if it has characteristic 0 and for any t -field k 0 k, t -finitely generated over Q, and any t -finitely generated extension k 1 of k 0, there is a t -differential k 0 -isomorphism of k 1 into k.

Theorem ( D, Mitschi/Singer) Let G be a differential subgroup of GL m (k). Then, G is the global parameterized differential Galois group of some equation having coefficients in k(z) if and only if G contains a finitely generated subgroup that is Kolchin-dense in G.

Cassidy, Phyllis J.; Singer, Michael F., Galois theory of parameterized differential equations and linear differential algebraic groups. Differential equations and quantum groups, 113-155, IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys., 9, Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2007. Dreyfus, Thomas, A density theorem for parameterized differential Galois theory. To appear in Pacific Journal of Mathematics. Mitschi, Claude; Singer, Michael F., Monodromy groups of parameterized linear differential equations with regular singularities. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 44 (2012), no. 5, 913-930.