ORTHOPHOTO PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Similar documents
Lecture 9: Reference Maps & Aerial Photography

To: Ross Martin, Lisa Stapleton From: Brad Lind Subject: Joint Funding Agreement with USGS for 2012 Imagery Date: March 14, 2012.

Metadata for 2005 Orthophotography Products

Indiana GIS Resources

Large Scale Mapping Policy for the Province of Nova Scotia

Statewide Topographic Mapping Program

Technical Drafting, Geographic Information Systems and Computer- Based Cartography


McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

State Geographic Information Consolidation Implementation Plan

Exploring GIS Potential for Northwestern Ontario Land Information Ontario

Information. Information Technology. Geographic. Services (GIS) 119 W Indiana Ave Deland, FL 32720

Spatial Data Availability Energizes Florida s Citizens

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

Creation of an Internet Based Indiana Water Quality Atlas (IWQA)

Jo Daviess County Geographic Information System

GIS for the Beginner on a Budget

Report from the Geographic Information Coordinating Council

GIS Monroe Geographic Information System March 14, 2018

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

Nomination Form. Clearinghouse. New York State Office for Technology. Address: State Capitol-ESP, PO Box

Emergency Planning. for the. Democratic National. Convention. imaging notes // Spring 2009 //

GIS-T 2010 Building a Successful Geospatial Data Sharing Framework: A Ohio DOT Success Story

MAPPS 2012 Geospatial Products and Services Excellence Awards Awards Entry Form

3D Elevation Program, Lidar in Missouri. West Central Regional Advanced LiDAR Workshop Ray Fox

STEREO ANALYST FOR ERDAS IMAGINE Stereo Feature Collection for the GIS Professional

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Aerial Photography and Imagery Resources Guide

Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Darrin Smith Ben Shelton. Morganton, NC January 29, 2015

INDIANAMAP VIEWING APPLICATION

1. Which agency in your state is PRIMARILY responsible for archiving geospatial data and managing archived geo records? (choose one) nmlkj.

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Tim Johnson Darrin Smith Ben Shelton. Greensboro, NC January 22, 2015

I. Collection purpose and description of the users. II. Selection, Evaluation and Prioritization

GIS DATA AND APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS San Diego Association of Governments

Flood Hazard Zone Modeling for Regulation Development

GIS Geographical Information Systems. GIS Management

SDI Development in Georgia. Mari Khardziani Head of International Relations Unit National Agency of Public Registry

Aerial Photography and Imagery Resources Guide

Section 2. Indiana Geographic Information Council: Strategic Plan

CHAPTER 22 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

The Indiana Data Sharing Initiative and the IndianaMap. Cross-Boundary Collaboration and Partnerships. State of Indiana

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

GIS Resources for Local Governments

An Internet-Based Integrated Resource Management System (IRMS)

Geographic Information System Services. Strategic Plan FY

State GIS Officer/GIS Data

GIS Workshop Data Collection Techniques

Internal Audit Report

Providing Public Access to King County GIS Data. Presented by: Michael Jenkins King County GIS Center Seattle, WA

Base Maps: Creating, Using & Participating

WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. FINAL OPERATING BUDGET... 3

U.S. Geological Survey Agency Briefing for MAPPS Mark L. DeMulder Director, National Geospatial Program. March 12, 2013

IMPERIAL COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Wetlands and Riparian Mapping Framework Technical Meeting

Florida Department of Transportation s

The 3D Elevation Program: Overview. Jason Stoker USGS National Geospatial Program ESRI 2015 UC

1) make sure folks know what s available in terms of geospatial data and resources that could contribute to their decision support toolkits;

Write a report (6-7 pages, double space) on some examples of Internet Applications. You can choose only ONE of the following application areas:

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Session 8

2013 Indiana GIS Conference. Mini-Workshop. (9:00 am 10:30 am)

Chesapeake Bay Remote Sensing Pilot Executive Briefing

GIS Data Conversion: Strategies, Techniques, and Management

2007 / 2008 GeoNOVA Secretariat Annual Report

7 GEOMATICS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS - ANNUAL REPORT 2006

OC Enterprise GIS. Kevin Hills, PLS Cameron Smith, GISP. OC Survey

Strategic Plan

Manitoba s Elevation (LiDAR) & Imagery Datasets. Acquisition Plans & Opportunities for Collaboration

Who has the data? Results of Maryland s 3-Week Statewide GIS Inventory Challenge. This is your state. This is your inventory.

Minimum Standards for Wetland Delineations

Lecture 7: GIS Data Capture and Metadata

Remote Sensing and Incident Support. Department of Homeland Security February 22, 2013

NEEA Refresh aka 3D Nation Requirements and Benefits Study. Allyson Jason, Carol Ostergren, Xan Fredericks and Lou Driber November 9, 2017

State of Israel Ministry of Housing and Construction Survey of Israel. The Hydrological project case

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 3

Author(s): Charles K. Cover, P.E. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

GIS-Based Sediment Quality Database for the St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC): Overview Presentations and Demonstration

Electronic Submission Format Guide Anthracite Preparation Plant Permit Application

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

USGS Hydrography Overview. May 9, 2018

UTAH S STATEWIDE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

Regional GIS Initiatives Geospatial Technology Center

Harvey Thorleifson, Director, Minnesota Geological Survey. Status of geological mapping needed for groundwater protection in Minnesota

KING GEORGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Frequently Asked Questions about MnDOT s Railroad Map Conversion Project

Oregon Department of Transportation. Geographic Information Systems Strategic Plan

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

Geospatial Technologies for the Agricultural Sciences

why is a national or regional context important?

Preparation of Database for Urban Development

An online data and consulting resource of THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO THE JACK FORD URBAN AFFAIRS CENTER

STATE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

MODULE 12: MAPPING. Key Concepts: Maps for Master Plans

Creating A-16 Compliant National Data Theme for Cultural Resources

RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CORKSCREW FARMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

2013 NASCIO Award Submission Category: Cross-Boundary Collaboration and Partnerships. Project Title: Public Safety and Enterprise GIS in Tennessee

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

Internet GIS Sites. 2 OakMapper webgis Application

Transcription:

ORTHOPHOTO PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS June 4, 2014 Document Purpose The Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) regularly receives questions regarding its orthophoto program. This document answers frequently asked questions and, as much as possible, is non-technical in nature. To obtain detailed technical information on DOR s orthophoto program, contact Charles Russell, Mapping and GIS Program Property Tax Oversight 2450 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0126 850-617-8867 Russellc@DOR.state.fl.us What is an orthophoto? An orthophotograph, commonly referred to as an orthophoto, consists of A photographic copy, prepared from a perspective photograph, in which the displacements of images due to tilt and relief have been removed. (Source: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping and the American Society of Civil Engineers. Definitions of Surveying and Associated Terms. Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 72-76807. Washington 1972, 1978.) Photogrammetrists typically create modern orthophotos using digital aerial cameras resulting in a fully digital product. Orthophotos are then tiled together to form an orthophotomosaic, which is a seamless assembly of orthophotographs forming a uniform-scale photographic map, directly compatible with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. Because the orthophotomosaic has uniform scale, users can perform accurate measurements of the ground features. These orthophotomosaics often serve as basemaps for creating other GIS layers. Examples include property ownership, census tracts, state lands, land use, wetlands, land cover, transportation networks, and hydrography (lakes and streams). What are DOR s orthophoto specifications? DOR has a well-defined orthophoto specification that has become the de facto standard in Florida. The basic specifications include: 1. Has 1-foot resolution (upgradeable to 6 inches where appropriate). 2. Cannot exceed a horizontal accuracy of about 5 feet for 1-foot orthophotos and 3 ½ feet for 6-inch orthophotos. Statistical tests have shown that accuracies typically exceed the minimum requirements. 3. Collects color infrared and natural color imagery. 4. Uses the industry standard GeoTIFF format that is compatible with most GIS software packages. 5. Incorporates an image tiling scheme that simplifies creating contiguous mosaics of large areas. The tiling scheme is also compatible with the Florida statewide LiDAR tiling scheme, which simplifies integrating topographic LiDAR data with orthophotos. 6. Has well-defined survey requirements that ensure that the data meet positional accuracy requirements. 7. Has well-defined metadata templates that ensure that users of the orthophotos have a clear understanding of when the imagery was flown and how accurate it is. Page 1 of 6

8. Yearly collects approximately 1/3 of the state, producing a county orthophoto update every three years. How does DOR procure orthophotos? In Florida, orthophotos are a type of survey as defined in Chapter 472, F.S., Professional Surveying and Mapping. Therefore, the procurement of professional services to create orthophotos must be in compliance with Chapter 287.055, F.S., Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act. Approximately every five years DOR issues a request for proposals and selects qualified consultants to provide a variety of mapping services that includes orthophoto creation. Pending approval of funding in the legislature s budget, DOR issues work orders each year to the qualified vendors to create orthophotos. Currently DOR has 14 vendors on contract. How does DOR coordinate its orthophoto projects with other agencies? DOR works to minimize duplicative orthophoto efforts as follows: State/Federal Coordination. Since 1988 DOR has participated in quarterly GIS meetings that include representatives from the following agencies: a. All five water management districts (WMD) b. U.S. Geological Survey (Homeland Security) c. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville d. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) e. Florida Department of Transportation (DOT) f. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) These are the primary state and federal agencies involved in orthophoto production, and each year they hold meetings specifically for coordination purposes. Local Government Coordination. Every year DOR contacts each county in the schedule to inform them of our orthophoto plans and to invite them to participate in the buy-up program. How long has DOR been flying orthophotos? Orthophotos are an extension of the much older aerial photography technologies and only became economical over large areas in the mid-1990s. The following table provides a chronology of the aerial photography and orthophotos available in the state. TABLE 1.1 Dates Imagery Resolution Source See Note 1940s - 1970s Aerial Photos NA U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, DOT 1 1970s - 1980s Aerial Photos NA USGS, DOT 2 1984-1985 Aerial Photos NA DOR, DOT 3 1989-1990 Aerial Photos NA DOR, DOT, SWFWMD 4 1994-1995 Orthophotos 3 feet USGS, DEP 5 1999 Orthophotos 3 feet USGS, DEP 5 2004 Orthophotos 3 feet USGS, DEP 6 Page 2 of 6

2005 through 2012 Orthophotos 1 foot USGS 7 2013 Orthophotos 1 foot DOR, DOT, SWFWMD 8 2014 Orthophotos 1 foot DOR, DOT 8 TABLE NOTES: 1. The U.S. Department of Agriculture historically flew black and white aerial photos county-by-county approximately once every ten years to monitor agriculture. 2. USGS, as part of the National High Altitude Aerial Photography Program, flew aerial photography over all of Florida. 3. DOR flew aerial photographs for all 67 counties to support property tax mapping and land use/cover mapping. The WMDs use it for land use/cover identification and the Save Our Rivers Land Acquisition Site Identification Model. 4. In 2005 DOR switched to a higher resolution (more detailed) orthophoto product. This change occurred in response to user requirements. 5. DOR begins offering local governments a buy-up option so they can tailor the imagery to their specific needs. DOR funds the base 1-foot orthophoto data, and the local government pays the upgrade costs. 6. Upgrades typically consist of 6-inch, instead of 1-foot imagery. 7. From 2005 through 2012, USGS has provided grant funding to DOR when Homeland Security requirements coincide with those of DOR. DOR uses these funds to offset expenditures. DOR also occasionally flies some counties in the WMDs, which eliminates the need for the WMDs to fund these overflights. 8. Currently USGS provides quality control (QC) services of the deliverable products. The grant funding is no longer available. Who can get copies of DOR orthophotos, and how much do they cost? DOR orthophotos are public records as defined in Chapter 119, F.S., Public Records. This means that the data are in the public domain and are available to the public at the cost of reproduction. The leading mapping trade group, Management Association for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors, endorses the concept that taxpayer-funded orthophotos should be in the public domain. The data are available in a number of ways: The Land Boundary Information System (LABINS) is a central repository of GIS data that DEP initially developed. The water management districts funded the enhancement of the LABINS website (www.labins.org) to improve public and private entities ability to obtain copies of orthophotos. This site is particularly useful for ordering large image datasets. DOT maintains a website that is particularly useful for downloading small image datasets and historical orthophotos (www.dot.state.fl.us/surveyingandmapping/aerial_main.shtm). DOR provides copies of the orthophotos to the U.S. Geological Survey for inclusion in the National Spatial Data Infrastructure. Users can order or download the orthophotos from http://nationalmap.gov/viewer.html. Why doesn t DOR use commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) aerial imagery such Google Earth or Bing Maps? 1. Consistent accuracy is necessary for proper use of the imagery by many state agencies. To date, COTS imagery offers no assurances of accuracy. While some of the COTS imagery services include imagery produced for DOR and other Florida agencies, there is no consistent documentation on the processes used to render it. Therefore it loses most of its original reliability and resulting value. 2. Florida has open records policies, so much of what you see of the state on COTS imagery sites and federal agencies like USGS comes from the DOR county mapping program. If you look carefully at the credits on Google Earth and Bing Maps you will see that they say something like Imagery Courtesy of USGS. In some cases this information is missing. One of the benefits of these other imagery sites hosting DOR imagery is that the public has easy Page 3 of 6

access to DOR s orthophotos in a user-friendly format. How does DOR use orthophotos? Orthophotos have become an important data component of almost every program at DOR. The following is a list (far from inclusive) of how DOR uses the data. 1. GIS Basemap. Accurate mapping of geographic features (property ownership, sale data, SUT data, buildings, water bodies, wetlands, permits, parcels, etc.) requires an accurate basemap. Orthophotos provide the most economical and accessible basemaps for mapping features of interest to county property appraisers. DOR staff are not the only users of orthophotos as basemaps; external private and public entities, such as property appraisers, power utilities, engineering firms, and county engineering departments, use them as well. These external agencies develop many products that return to DOR as parcel data or spatial application information or in economic studies supporting using mapping/gis computations. 2. Reduction in Time Spent on Field Investigations. DOR field investigations are a key component of appraisal activities, land acquisition and management, planning and monitoring of restoration projects, and field data collection. Field inspections are costly in terms of staff time and equipment. Current, accurate, and high-resolution photos provide the following support for field investigations: a. Replace the need for field investigations. DOR can eliminate many field investigations because staff can view the orthophoto imagery at their desks. b. Prioritize costly field investigations. Orthophotos provide a synoptic view that allows staff to identify the most important areas to visit in the field. c. Supplement field investigations. Staff can take orthophotos in the field in hardcopy formats or on portable devices (laptops, GPS receivers, mobile devices, etc.) and use those to facilitate navigation and document field conditions. The result is a more effective use of staff s field time. d. Identify activities not seen from field visits. Field visits are typically limited to areas that are accessible by vehicles (or short distances from vehicle access points). Orthophotos allow staff to have detailed views of large inaccessible areas. e. Reduce field inspection requirements. The high resolution and accuracy of orthophotos reduce the need for costly field visits. Staff can use orthophotos to map structures, data collection sites, burn units, aquatic plant application areas, impervious surfaces, etc. at a fraction of the costs of ground surveys. 3. Project Planning. The ability to accurately measure distances and areas (particularly in areas that are difficult to access) and the synoptic view from orthophotos allow staff to efficiently plan projects and ultimately reduce project implementation costs. Examples include: a. Conduct in-depth appraisal studies. b. Identify access points. c. Monitor trends in sales or land use. d. Identify changes in land use that may require map updates, spatial updates, and cost estimation for models and trends. How does DOR review its orthophoto program to ensure that it meets the business needs of internal and external customers? As with all its data collection programs, DOR regularly reviews its collection of orthophotos to ensure Page 4 of 6

that it: 1. Meets internal and external customers business needs. 2. Is cost efficient. 3. Is securely and efficiently managed within DOR s information systems. The following is an overview of the review process: 1. Meeting the customers needs a. Identify customers i. DOR staff ii. Partner agencies iii. General public b. Identify customer requirements i. Internal surveys of DOR staff ii. Coordination meetings with partners (federal, state, local governments) c. Turn customer requirements into projects specifications i. How often do we update imagery? ii. How accurate do they need to be? iii. What is the resolution? iv. How do we deliver the data to customers? 2. Cost-efficient collection a. Design specifications to meet customer needs. b. Follow technology trends (for example, shift from film to digital cameras) to reduce costs in close coordination with private sector mapping firms. c. Ensure competitive procurement processes are compliant with state law and DOR policies. d. Coordinate with other agencies to minimize duplicated effort. 3. Data management a. Monitor information technology image management, computing, and storage trends. How much does DOR s orthophotography program cost? Several factors determine the annual cost to DOR for collecting orthophotos. They include: 1. Technology. Changes in technology have significant potential to lower costs over time. A good example of this is that between 1994 and 2004, increased computing power, digital cameras, and the use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) reduced the cost of the collection of DOR s 1-meter resolution orthophotos. Since 2005 costs for DOR s 1-foot orthophotos have been fairly stable, primarily because the high cost of first generation digital cameras offset advances in software, GPS, and computing power. We are seeing evidence that this trend is changing and believe that we will see reduced costs for the same product in coming years. 2. Competition. Orthophotos were once a specialty product that only a few high-end mapping vendors could supply. With advances in technology, orthophotos seem to be moving toward becoming more of a commodity than a specialty product. This will increase competition and reduce costs. Page 5 of 6

3. Coordination with State Agencies. DOR actively coordinates with other agencies to reduce duplicative efforts. In some years the WMDs fly aerial photos; therefore we do not have to fly those areas. This works well because the WMDs have adopted DOR s orthophoto minimum specifications. 4. Coordination with Local Governments. DOR flies a base orthophoto product but has specifically defined both its contracting mechanisms and technical specifications to allow local governments to buy-up to an improved product that is tailored to meet their specifications. The cooperating partner pays buy-up costs in full. 5. USGS Grants. DOR actively seeks grants from the U.S. Geological Survey to offset orthophoto costs. These are most commonly from Homeland Security Agency funding sources. In most years DOR has benefitted from this funding source. Word Document (R.6-4-14) Page 6 of 6