EFECTS OF COLD WATER RECHARGE ON DOWNHOLE TEMPERATURE WELLS OF CERRO PRIETO UNO AREA IN CERRO PRIETO FIELD MEXICO

Similar documents
Reservoir Processes Inferred by Geochemical, Stable Isotopes and Gas Equilibrium Data in Cerro Prieto, B.C., México

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

The Initial-State Geochemistry as a Baseline for Geochemical Monitoring at Ulubelu Geothermal Field, Indonesia

-344- LIQUID-DOMINATED GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIRS. Lewis Semprini and Paul Kruger Civil Engineering Department Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305

Response to Exploitation of the Los Azufres (Mexico) Geothermal Reservoir

RESPONSE OF WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR TO 40 YEARS OF PRODUCTION

Numerical Simulation of Devolution and Evolution of Steam-Water Two-Phase Zone in a Fractured Geothermal Reservoir at Ogiri, Japan

Structural Controls on the Chemistry and Output of the Wells in the Olkaria Geothermal Field, Kenya

Geochemical Modelling of Low-Temperature Geothermal Fields from Bihor County, Romania

Decision Analysis Applied to Las Tres Vírgenes Geothermal Field Mexico

A Genetic Algorithm in Subsidence Modeling in the Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field, Baja California, Mexico

Presented at the Geothermal Conference of the Committee on Challenges of Modern Society, NATO, Paris, France, July 15, 1980 CQMF-

Using Repeat Microgravity Measurements to Track Reinjection in Liquid-Dominated Fields

Geochemical monitoring of the response ofgeothermal reservoirs to production load examples from Krafla, Iceland

Determination of Calcite Scaling Potential in OW-903 and OW-914 of the Olkaria Domes field, Kenya

GeothermEx, Inc. GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION HOLE PROGRAM, KILAUEA EAST RIFT ZONE, HAWAII TASK 1 REPORT

SEISMICITY AT THE MIRAVALLES GEOTHERMAL FIELD, COSTA RICA ( ): A TOOL TO CONFIRM THE REAL EXTENSION OF THE RESERVOIR*

SUBSIDENCE IN CERRO PRIETO GEOTHERMAL FIELD, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO.

RESERVOIR CHANGES DURING EIGHTEEN YEARS OF EXPLOITATION IN THE MIRAVALLES GEOTHERMAL FIELD, COSTA RICA

HYDROTHERMAL MODEL OF THE MOMOTOMBO GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM, NICARAGUA

Numerical Simulation Study of the Mori Geothermal Field, Japan

MAIN ASPECTS OF GEOTHERMICS IN MEXICO

HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION IN ACTIVE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS A CASE STUDY OF OLKARIA DOMES

Franco D'Amore,Claudio Calore and Romano Celati. Istituto Internazionale per le Ricerche Geotermiche (CNR) Via del Buongusto 1, Pisa, Italy

NUMERICAL MODELING STUDY OF SIBAYAK GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR, NORTH SUMATRA, INDONESIA

MODELING AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TWO-PHASE GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR AT OGIRI, KYUSHU, JAPAN

-97- PROCEEDINGS. Twelfth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, January 32-22, 1987 SCP-TR- 109

K.P. Goyal** and D.R. Kassoy University of Colorado Boulder, Coloratdo Geological, geophysical, geochemical, and borehole

-258- I. Ershaghi, S. Ghaemian Department of Petroleum Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90007

HEAT TRANSFER IN A LOW ENTHALPY GEOTHERMAL WELL

OVERVIEW OF THE WAIRAKEI-TAUHARA SUBSIDENCE INVESTIGATION PROGRAM

A New Method of Evaluation of Chemical Geothermometers for Calculating Reservoir Temperatures from Thermal Springs in Nevada

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEPENED WELLS 420DA AND 517DA IN THE LEYTE GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION FIELD, PHILIPPINES

Trevor M. Hunta and Warwick M. %slingb

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

- the gaslateam ratio and 6l80 have decreased

INTERPRETATION OF INTERFERENCE EFFECTS IN THREE PRODUCTION WELLS IN THE KAWERAU GEOTHERMAL FIELD, NEW ZEALAND. Lynell Stevens and Kevin J Koorey

Geochemical Characteristics of Reservoir Fluid from NW-Sabalan Geothermal Field, Iran

Fluid Geochemistry at the Nir Geothermal Field, Nw-Iran

TEMPERATURE LOGGING IN PERFORATED WELLS

Determination of Geothermal Gradient in the Eastern Niger Delta Sedimentary Basin from Bottom Hole Temperatures

Heat (& Mass) Transfer. conceptual models of heat transfer. large scale controls on fluid movement. distribution of vapor-saturated conditions

TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION AND CONCEPTUAL RESERVOIR MODEL FOR GEOTHERMAL FIELDS IN AND AROUND THE CITY OF REYKJAVÍK, ICELAND

Reinjection Management in Balcova Geothermal Field

EVOLUTION OF HELIUM AND ARGON AT A VOLCANIC GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

Geothermometer, Geoindicator and Isotope Monitoring in Lahendong Wells during

THE CERRO PRIETO AND SALTON SEA GEOTHERMAL FIELDS ARE THEY REALLY ALIKE? Marcelo Lippmann (1), Alfred Truesdell (2) and George Frye (3)

Conceptual model for non-volcanic geothermal resources - examples from Tohoku Japan

Thermal Modeling of the Mountain Home Geothermal Area

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Serica Energy (UK) Limited. P.1840 Relinquishment Report. Blocks 210/19a & 210/20a. UK Northern North Sea

Bog Hot Valley. (updated 2012)

Bulletin of Earth Sciences of Thailand. Evaluation of the Petroleum Systems in the Lanta-Similan Area, Northern Pattani Basin, Gulf of Thailand

Geologic influence on variations in oil and gas production from the Cardium Formation, Ferrier Oilfield, west-central Alberta, Canada

DETECTION OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION USING RESISTIVITY IMAGING AT SERI PETALING LANDFILL, MALAYSIA

THREE DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELING OF MINDANAO GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION FIELD, PHILIPPINES

Groundwater. (x 1000 km 3 /y) Reservoirs. Oceans Cover >70% of Surface. Groundwater and the. Hydrologic Cycle

UK data for geothermal resource assessments

A New Combinational Terminology for Geothermal Systems

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

2. California Energy Company, Inc. 3. Thermochem, Inc.


Assessing the Effect of Realistic Reservoir Features on the Performance of Sedimentary Geothermal Systems

Update on the Stable Isotope Geochemistry of the Leyte Geothermal Production Field

Fundamentals of Ground Source GTHP Pump Technology

Yellowstone National Park: Regional Groundwater Dynamics in High-Temperature Geothermal Areas

Enhancement of Silica-Enthalpy Mixing Model to Predict Enthalpy of Geothermal Reservoir

Geothermal Energy in the UK

APLICATION OF INSAR TO THE STUDY OF GROUND DEFORMATION IN THE MEXICALI VALLEY, B. C., MEXICO.

Geothermal power generation in the Upper Rhine Valley The Project Offenbach/Pfalz

ANN ROBERTSON TAIT PRESENT POSITION. Business Development Manager / Senior Geologist EXPERTISE

Recommendations for Injection and Storage Monitoring

Structural Controls on the Geochemistry and Output of the Wells in the Olkaria Geothermal Field of the Kenyan Rift Valley

Performance Productivity Curves in Geothermal Systems: A Case of Los Humeros, México

CASE HISTORY OF LOS AZUFRES CONCEPTUAL MODELLING IN A MEXICAN GEOTHERMAL FIELD

GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS IN SEDIMENT-FILLED RIFT VALLEYS: HYDRODYNAMIC AND GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS. Wolfgang Polster and Hubert L.

REDUCING COST AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF GEOTHERMAL POWER THROUGH MODELING OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES IN THE RESERVOIR

What is a water table? What is an aquifer? What is the difference between a spring and a well?

DEVELOPMENT OF THE OPTIMUM NUMERICAL RESERVOIR MODEL OF THE TAKIGAMI GEOTHERMAL FIELD, OITA, JAPAN

FLUID STRATIGRAPHY OF THE COSO GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

DOUBLE-DIFFUSIVE CONVECTION AS A MECHANISM FOR TRANSFERRING HEAT AND MASS WITHIN THE SALTON SEA GEOTHERMAL BRINE. Robert 0.

Acid Fracturing Results for Well AZ-47D, Los Azufres Geothermal Field in Mexico

Early Identification and Management of Calcite Deposition in the Ngatamariki Geothermal Field, New Zealand

Land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal in Hanoi, Vietnam

GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF ST. KITTS AND NEVIS ISLANDS

Comparison of measured and simulated pressure and temperature profiles in geothermal wells

Although steam alone is produced from wells and natural vents in vapor-dominated systems, it is generally accepted that

TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM *.BY. Roger F. Harrison Salt Lake City, Utah. C; K. Blair

SUB-SURFACE GEOLOGY AND HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION OF WELLS LA-9D AND LA-10D OF ALUTO LANGANO GEOTHERMAL FIELD, ETHIOPIA

JosC Tenorio Mejia', Franco D'Amore' and Jane Y. Gerardo3

Deformation Around the Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field Recorded by the Geotechnical Instruments Network REDECVAM during

Characterization of Subsurface Permeability of the Olkaria East Geothermal Field

Origin and Evolution of Formation Waters in the West-Central Part of the Alberta Basin

Status of geothermal energy exploration at Buranga geothermal prospect, Western Uganda

Sophie C. P. Pearson, GNS Science, Wairakei Research Centre, Taupo, New Zealand

New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Tokyo, Japan. Average power through the year Authorized rated output

GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE CONCEPTUAL MODELS USING SURFACE EXPLORATION DATA

EVALUATING HEAT FLOW AS A TOOL FOR ASSESSING GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF THE KAMOJANG GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM, INDONESIA

CERD GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATIONS AND RESULTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI. Short Course Naivasha, Kenya, November 2006

Transcription:

EFECTS OF COLD WATER RECHARGE ON DOWNHOLE TEMPERATURE WELLS OF CERRO PRIETO UNO AREA IN CERRO PRIETO FIELD MEXICO Juan De Dios Ocampo Diaz 1 ; Jesús De León Vivar 2 1 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Facultad de Ingeniería, Carrera de Ingeniero Mecánico, Blv. Benito Juárez, s/n, Mexicali, B. C., México, E-mail: juandios@uabc.mx 2 Comisión Federal de Electricidad, Residencia de Estudios, Departamento de Ingeniería de Yacimientos, Campo geotérmico de Cerro Prieto, E-mail; jdelon@cfe.gob.mx ABSTRACT The first area under exploitation in Cerro Prieto geothermal field in México was Cerro Prieto I, this area of 12 km 2 is located in the west part of the geothermal field; it started the commercial production in 1973. Two reservoirs have been identified in CPI area, the shallow alpha and the deeper beta reservoir, which extends over the entire field. Through 30 years under exploitation the old field of Cerro Prieto I have been produced around 800 millions of tons of watersteam mixture; this geothermal area has been showing several reservoir changes in their chemical and thermodynamics properties. This part of the Cerro Prieto geothermal systems is strongly influenced by nearby groundwater aquifers; cooler water readily recharges the reservoir. In response to exploitation, the natural influx of cold water into the shallower alpha reservoir is mainly from the west and possibly from down fault named L, whiles the recharge to the deeper beta reservoir in this part of the field, and seems to be only lateral, from the west and possible south. As consequence of the cooler recharge some production wells in this area show a temperatures higher than 50 C, and other show reversal temperatures in the downhole. This paper analysed and discusses the downhole temperatures evolution in this old area of the Cerro Prieto geothermal system with more than 30 years of commercial exploitation. INTRODUCTION The Cerro Prieto geothermal field, located in the northern Baja California, Mexico, about 35 km south of the US-Mexico border, is developed in the deltaic sands and shales. Extensive drilling by the Comisión Federal de Electricidad, has provided fairly detailed information concerning lithology and temperatures from about 800 to 3500 m depth approximately. Geothermal exploration in Cerro Prieto geothermal field started in the lathe 1950s and lead to drilling the first deep exploration wells in 1960-1961 (Lippman et al., 1999). The Comisión Federal de Electricidad of Mexico, which operates and manages Cerro Prieto began power commercial production in 1973 with 75 MWe; 1979, capacity was 150 MWe and by 1981, 180 MWe. At the end of 1986, by extending the production area to E and completing two 220-MWe s, the total installed capacity reached 620 MWe, finally during 2000 was added two 100 MWe units more. Thus present day the total capacity at Cerro Prieto is 720 MWe. Since started the reservoir develop, more than 250 wells have been drilled in Cerro Prieto, some of them are exploration wells, other injection wells, reservoir monitoring wells, and the highest percentage correspond to production wells. Approximating 150 wells are supplying steam to four power s. Cerro Prieto is a largest liquid-dominated geothermal system under exploitation, these wells producing about 12,000 tons per hour of mixture of steam-water. The geothermal field has been divided in four areas CI, CPII, CPIII and CP IV (Fig 1). 1 km CP3 M-27 CP1 M-132 M-111 M-172 CP2 CUPOLA HFZ E-25 E-41 E-43 Figure 1.- Cerro Prieto Production areas CERRO PRIETO RESERVOIR CP4 The Cerro Prieto geothermal field is limited mainly by two important structures, the Cerro Prieto Fault at W and Imperial fault at NE. The top of the production zone have been defined by the silica-epidote zone. The Cerro Prieto wells produce from three major aquifer, the α (alpa) it

is the shallower reservoir located in the W of the field (CP I field), β(beta) it exist along of entire field underlying the alpa reservoir (CP I, II and III), and the deeper γ (gamma reservoir) to E of the field. According to Halfman et al., Cerro Prieto Model (1984, 1986), the hot fluids originates at great depths in the eastern portion of the field flowing through the deepest reservoir identified like γ (gamma reservoir) and then the fluids rises along fault H, flow westward through the sandstone into β(beta) reservoir, then ascending to sandy gap in shale and flowing westward through a sandy shale layer, corresponding to the α (alpa) reservoir, then rise up fault L, and flow westward trough the shallower sandstone. However, the rock matrix permeability and porosity conditions dominated the intergranular fluid distribution in the reservoir, (Mahendra et al., 999, Ocampo et al, 2000). The Cerro Prieto wells produce from three major aquifer, the α (alpa) it is the shallower reservoir located in the W of the field (CP I field), β(beta) it exist along of entire field underlying the alpa reservoir (CP I, II and III), and the deeper γ (gamma reservoir) to E of the field. Halfman et al. (1984, 1986) and Lippman et al. (1989) have described the natural state hydrology of Cerro Prieto. These descriptions are based on lithologic and temperatures logs and on modelling of heat and fluids flows. The general pattern of circulation in each of the Cerro Prieto reservoirs is similar It has been suggested from geochemical arguments, that the deep recharge to the Cerro Prieto systems is formed from hypersaline brines of marines origin that mix with Colorado Rivers water in several stages (Truesdell et al., 1981). This mixing was the major process for cooling the Cerro Prieto brines in the natural state. The hot brines (at 350 ºC where first encountered) flow up normal faults H and enter the deep g (gamma) y b (beta) reservoir and then flows through part of the b (beta) reservoirs to the shallow α (alpha) reservoir. Each of these reservoirs has complex connection through more or less permeable interbedded sandstones and shales to the hot brines and in most parts to cooler water. The g (gamma) reservoir has been found only SE of fault H at depths greater than 3300 m. Very few wells produce from this aquifer. The entry of hot water suggests connection and flow to cold aquifers to maintain temperatures. The b (beta) reservoir is the largest in the exploited field. It underlies the entire α (alpha) reservoir and extends to the NE. The depth to this reservoir is around 1500 m in the W to more than 2700 m in the E. It is divided by SE dipping fault H into upthrown and downthrown blocks. Fluids ascending along fault H flow NW and SE into these two parts of the b (beta) reservoir (Fig. 2). CPI area Evaporation Lagoon RR Fault L CP III area Fault H Figure 2.- Cerro Prieto Faults CERRO PRIETO I FEATURES CP IV area CP II area The Cerro Prieto I area is located in west part of the field, (Figs. 1 and 2). This was first exploited area in Cerro Prieto geothermal field. This area presents two geothermal production zones, the shallow (at 1000 to 1500 m depth) named alpha reservoir and the deeper (below 1500 m depth) named beta reservoir (Sánchez and de la Peña, 1981). Previous fluid flow models of the Cerro Prieto were mainly based on the analysis of lithologic and temperature logs (e.g., Halfman et al., 1982, 1986; Lippmann et al., 1991). Rodriguez et al., (2000), have been classified CP I reservoir into five zones as to shows de table 1: Table 1, Cerro Prieto I reservoirs subdivision No. Zone Name Depth average (m) 1 α N Alpha north 1500 2 β N Beta north 1600 3 α S Alpha south 1650 4 β S Beta south 1700 5 β SW Beta southwest 1800 Table 1, Cerro Prieto I reservoirs subdivision In about 1977, some four year after the first power came on line, the geochemistry of the fluids produced by many Cerro Prieto I wells began reflecting an encroachment of cold water into the shallower alpha reservoir (Truesdell et al., 1979, 1989). With time, additional data confirmed that more-dilute

groundwater were recharging the geothermal systems and that heat was being swept by the colder water as they moved toward the producing wells (Grant et al., 1984). Initial fluids production began from the shallower alpha reservoir located only in the western part of the Cerro Prieto Field, this zones of the field is named CP I. As consequence of large-scale production from the deeper beta reservoir which extend over the entire field Lipmman et all., (1989), realized an analysis of five wells located in Cerro Prieto I, in alpha and beta reservoir, using geochemical data (geothermometer and chloride concentrations), the table 2 shows de temperature decreasing calculated from this data using the NaKCa and Silica temperatures. Well Reservoir Production T ( C ) M-42 Alpha 1976-1989 20 E-4 Beta 1981-1989 35 M-35 Alpha 1974-1989 70 M-31 Alpha 1971-1983 25 Table 2, Cerro Prieto I wells downhole temperatures Between 1973 and 1980 most of the fluid produced at Cerro Prieto came from alpha reservoir. Present exploitation of the alpha reservoir continues but on a smaller scale as a reduce production enthalpy (i.e. steam /water ratio). As consequence of production, the pressure in the alpha reservoir has dropped resulting in an increasing of influx of colder, less saline water (Grant et al, 1984, Truesdell et al., 1984). The beta reservoir has been discovered in 1974 in the eastern part of the field with the drilling of well M-53. Some CPI deeper wells like E-1 are located in this reservoir. Rodriguez, et al., (2002), realized an analysis of the dowhole temperatures in some Cerro Prieto I wells, using static temperature logs, the main comments obtained from it, are included in table 3: Rodriguez et al., (2000), realized the following observations: E-9 well, showed temperature decreased of 20 C in the αn reservoir upper 1450 m, and decreased of 50 ºC in the βn reservoir below of 1450 m; similar temperatures were. Wells E-63, showed similar behaviour of well E-9. Well 143, drilled in 1998, shows a temperature reversal below of 1800 m. The temperature decreased observed in β 1 S y en α S reservoirs were evaluated with static temperature logs in wells M-48, E-57, M-84 y M-84A, realized in different years; these point out a temperature decreasing of 80 C in α S reservoir and les than 80 ºC in β. S 1 CERRO PRIETO I RECHARGE As consequence of the continues exploitation through 30 years, Cerro Prieto I reservoirs have been producing more than 800 millions of tons of mixture water-steam, the pressure drawdown is causing the influx of cool water toward the reservoir, several authors (Grant et al., 1984, Truesdell et al., 1975, Mercado, 1975) have been indicated the influx of cool water from the west part of the CP I area (Fig. 3). Besides a considerable amount of cool water from aquifer located in southwest of the field is feeding the CP I reservoir ( Truesdell et al., 1990, Mercado, 1975). Mercado, 1975, pointed out a recharge observed in the earlier develop of this Cerro Prieto area, when only have a few production wells produced. The α reservoir is connected to cold water aquifers laterally in the W and S and the top through fault L. providing a leaky cap (Grant and O Sullivan, 1982). Well Time space T ( C ) Depth (m) E-9 1984-1989 50 C 1700 M-143 1989-1987 50 C 1800 E-63 1989-1997 50 1700 M-48 1978-1989 90** 1200 ** decreased compared with well E-57 Table 3, Temperature decreased observed in Cerro Prieto I wells

FAULT L Hidalgo we considered this decreasing temperature value as representative of the CPI reservoir it corresponds to 1.67 ºC/year of production. VERTICAL CP III FAULT H The recharge of cool water toward the CP I reservoirs have been identified from west lateral and upper vertical. CP I CP II REFERENCES LATERAL EVAPORATION POUND Grant, M. A. and O Sullivan, M.J., 1995, The Old Field at Cerro Considered as a Leaky Aquifer, Symposium of Cerro Prieto geothermal field. Figure 3 Cerro Prieto I recharge inferred directions The β reservoir also has lateral connection to cooler aquifer to the SW and SE (Grant et al., 1984). Rodriguez, et al., (2000), realized the following observation related to present recharge direction: A cool water lateral recharge (low temperature) from west to Cerro Prieto I reservoirs, through α and upper zone of β 1. N A cool water recharge (low temperature) from upper aquifer maybe induced by the high vertical permeability in the zones of fault Cerro Prieto and fault L. CONCLUSION Cerro Prieto I area, is the oldest zone more exploited in Cerro Prieto geothermal field, it started the commercial production in 1973, to present more than 800 million of mixture of water-steam have been extracted from this zone, it have been causing reservoir pressure drawdown and consequent influx of cool water. The analysis of the geochemical and production data of Cerro Prieto I wells, showed during earlier exploitation stage a cool water recharge from west and southwest. After 30 years of production static temperature logs realized in some wells located in alpha and beta reservoir showed temperature decreased about 50 C approximately, it is a clear evidence of the influx of cool water to reservoir, this temperatures decreasing have been mentioned by several authors using geochemical data. If N Grant, M.Q., Truesdell, A. H., and Mañon, A., 1984, Production induced boiling and cold water entry in the Cerro Prieto Geothermal Reservoir indicated by chemical and physical measurements: Geothermics, v. 13, p. 117-140. Lippmann, M. and Truesdell Alfred, H., (1995), Reservoir Simulation and Geochemical Study of Cerro Prieto I Wells, Proc. 15 th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA. Truesdell, Alfred, H., Lippmann, Marcelo., Gutierrez, P. Héctor., (1997), Evolution of the Cerro Prieto Reservoir Under Exploitation., Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, Vol. 21. Rodriguez, M.H., Gutierrez, P.,H., De Leon, J. (2000), Update Fluid Flow Model for the CP1 Area of the Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field, Proceeding, 25 th Workshop on geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, p-24-26. Truesdell, A.H., Nehring, N.L., Thompson, J.M., Janik, C.J., (1984), A Review of Progress in Understating the Fluid Geochemistry of the Cerro Prieto Geothermal System, Geothermics, vol. 13, No. ½, p. 65-74. Mercado, Sergio, (1991), aspectos básicos de la recarga de agua al reservorio de Cerro Prieto, Artículos Técnicos, Boletín IIE, Julio-Agosto. Halfam, S.E., Lippman, M.J., Boadvarsson, (1986), Quantitative Modelo f the Cerro prieto field, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, LBL- 20523. Halfam, S.E., Mañon, A., Lippman, M.J., (1986), Update of the hydrogeology model of the Cerro Prieto field based on recent well data, Geothermal Resources Council, Transactions.

Mahendra,Verma., Quijano, Luis., Gutiérrez, Héctor., Iglesias, Eduardo., Truesdell, Alfredo., (1996), Isotopic Changes in the fluid of Cerro Prieto beta ( β ) Reservoir, Proceeding of the 21 st Workshop on the Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, pp 93-99. Ocampo, D.J., De Leon, J., (2000) Impact of the Structural System on the production area in Cerro Prieto geothermal field, Geothermal Resources Council, Transactions.