Faddeev-Yakubovsky Technique for Weakly Bound Systems

Similar documents
Three-Body Bound State Calculations by Using Three-Dimensional Low Momentum Interaction V low k

EXOTIC CARBON SYSTEMS IN TWO-NEUTRON HALO THREE-BODY MODELS

Universality in Four-Boson Systems

Universality in Four-Boson Systems

Scaling limit of virtual states of triatomic systems

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 5 Mar 2001

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 2013

Marcelo Takeshi Yamashita Instituto de Física Teórica IFT / UNESP

One-Proton Radioactivity from Spherical Nuclei

Few- Systems. Selected Topics in Correlated Hyperspherical Harmonics. Body. A. Kievsky

PoS(Confinement8)147. Universality in QCD and Halo Nuclei

The Higgs boson mass in minimal technicolor models

2 Quantum Mechanics on a Noncommutative Plane

Calculation of relativistic nucleon-nucleon potentials in three dimensions

Poincaré Invariant Calculation of the Three-Body Bound State Energy and Wave Function

Muon Capture With Improved Chiral Forces

Relaxation algorithm to hyperbolic states in Gross Pitaevskii equation

NNLO antenna subtraction with two hadronic initial states

BFT quantization of chiral-boson theories

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 13 Feb 1992

Alpha particles in effective field theory

Symmetry transform in Faddeev-Jackiw quantization of dual models

Isospin structure of one- and two-phonon giant dipole resonance excitations

The Elliptic Solutions to the Friedmann equation and the Verlinde s Maps.

LORENTZ BOOSTED NUCLEON-NUCLEON T-MATRIX AND THE TRITON BINDING ENERGY

RELAXATION AND TRANSIENTS IN A TIME-DEPENDENT LOGISTIC MAP

A new ab initio method of calculating Z eff and positron annihilation rates using coupled-channel T-matrix amplitudes

F. S.Navarra Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, C.P , São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Three- and four-particle scattering

Vacuum Polarization in the Presence of Magnetic Flux at Finite Temperature in the Cosmic String Background

Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions

Static and covariant meson-exchange interactions in nuclear matter

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 22 Jun 2012

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 7 Mar 2014

arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 31 Jan 2011

Four-nucleon scattering

Generalization of the matrix product ansatz for integrable chains

386 Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 30, no. 2, June, 2000 Atomic Transitions for the Doubly Ionized Argon Spectrum, Ar III 1 F. R. T. Luna, 2 F. Br

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 16 Mar 2004 GLUEBALL-GLUEBALL INTERACTION IN THE CONTEXT OF AN EFFECTIVE THEORY

renormalization, the AB potential becomes related to the delta function, contact, interaction. These issues have been discussed from the quantum mecha

Modern Physics Letters A Vol. 24, Nos (2009) c World Scientific Publishing Company

Faddeev equations: a view of baryon properties

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 25 Mar 1998

Coulomb and nuclear potentials between deformed nuclei

Lecture notes for QFT I (662)

Three-body final state interactions in D` Ñ K π`π`

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 23 Mar 2004

Charmed mesons at finite temperature and chemical potential

Dirac-Brueckner mean fields and an effective* density-dependent DiracHartree-Fock interaction in nuclear. matter

Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials

On a Conjecture Concerning Helly Circle Graphs

The Euler-Kockel-Heisenberg Lagrangian at Finite Temperature. Abstract

PoS(ISFTG)023. Systemic Gauge Theory. Ana Paula Lima CBPF, Brazil José Chauca CBPF, Brazil

Coupled-cluster theory for nuclei

On the calculation of inner products of Schur functions

Quantum Field Theory II

Feynman diagrams in nuclear physics at low and intermediate energies

INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FRICKE GEL (FXG) DOSIMETER DEVELOPED AT IPEN IRRADIATED WITH 60 Co GAMMA RAYS

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Jul 2003

Scattering of positronium by H, He, Ne, and Ar

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 2 May 2017

arxiv: v1 [physics.atom-ph] 9 Mar 2019

Forbush decreases detected by the MUONCA muon telescopes on 13 September and 22 December 2014

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 30 Oct 2005

Light hypernuclei based on chiral and phenomenological interactions

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 24 Dec 1998

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 7 Apr 2015

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

Universal behaviour of four-boson systems from a functional renormalisation group

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 20 May 1999

in-medium pair wave functions the Cooper pair wave function the superconducting order parameter anomalous averages of the field operators

Tight-binding treatment of the Hubbard model in infinite dimensions

Beta functions in quantum electrodynamics

D-Branes at Finite Temperature in TFD

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 14 Aug 2008

Poincaré Invariant Three-Body Scattering

1.1 A Scattering Experiment

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 22 Apr 2018

E2, E4, and E6 statistical decay spectra in "Tb

Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 29, no. 4, December, Caixa Postal 676, 13564{200, S~ao Carlos, SP, Brazil

Solitons in atomic condensates, with optical lattices and field-induced dipole moments

Electronic Supplementary Information.

Classification of Tripartite Entanglement with one Qubit. Marcio F. Cornelio and A. F. R. de Toledo Piza

Modeling Electromagnetic Form Factors of Light and Heavy Pseudoscalar Mesons

NNLO antenna subtraction with one hadronic initial state

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

Ward-Takahashi Relations: Longitudinal and Transverse

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 26 Sep 2001

Universality check of the overlap fermions in the Schrödinger functional

I. CSFs Are Used to Express the Full N-Electron Wavefunction

The Color Flavor Locked Phase in the Chromodielectric Model and Quark Stars

NN scattering: Chiral predictions for asymptotic observables

2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections

Coupled channel description for X(3872) and other XYZ mesons

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 22 Sep 2000

R function for residual analysis in linear mixed models: lmmresid

Transcription:

Faddeev-Yakubovsky Technique for Weakly Bound Systems Instituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 4-7, São Paulo, SP, Brazil E-mail: hadizade@ift.unesp.br M. T. Yamashita Instituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 4-7, São Paulo, SP, Brazil E-mail: yamashita@ift.unesp.br Lauro Tomio Instituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 4-7, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, 4-46, Niterói, RJ, Brazil E-mail: tomio@ift.unesp.br A. Delfino Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, 4-46, Niterói, RJ, Brazil E-mail: delfino@if.uff.br T. Frederico Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, DCTA, 8-9, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil E-mail: tobias@ita.br The Faddeev-Yakubovsky formalism for the study of three- and four-boson bound states have been derived in a partial wave representation for separable potentials and by considering only the s-wave channel contribution. In order to be able to study the weakly three- and four-boson bound states the obtained formalism is simplified for a zero range interaction and the integral equations are regularized by a subtraction technique. PoSXXXIV BWNP4 XXXIV edition of the Brazilian Workshop on Nuclear Physics, 5- June Foz do Iguaçu, Parana state, Brasil Speaker. c Copyright owned by the authors under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

. Introduction Nature shows the existence of weakly bound systems in different sectors, ranging from atomic to nuclear physics. Few-body systems with large scattering length exhibit universal features, which are independent of the details of the interaction, and thus are common to nuclear and atomic systems. Very different methods are used to study the properties of few-body systems, from Faddeev- Yakubovsky method []-[] to diagonalization methods that rely on an expansion of the wave functions in a complete basis set, like e.g. hyperspherical harmonics and no core shell model. In this paper we present the Faddeev-Yakubovsky formalism to study the three- and four-boson bound states in momentum space. To show the efficiency and accuracy of the method, we have recently investigated the three- and four-boson weakly bound states in the unitary limit for zero two-body binding and we have obtained a pretty complete picture of universal tetramers.. Faddeev-Yakubovsky Equations for Four-Boson Bound State In this section, we describe the Faddeev-Yakubovsky FY formalism for the bound state of four identical bosons. As shown in Eq.., in a 4B system with particles called i, j, k and l there are 8 different coordinate systems, each associated with a specific two-body partition. These chains have basically two different structures, + structure i.e., a chain in which the four-body system is subdivided into a three-body subsystem and a single particle and + i.e., subdivision of a four-body system into two two-body subsystems. Clearly, as we know from the Faddeev formalism, each three-body subsystem can also be devided into three + chains. i j + k + l i jk + l jk + i + l ki + j + l i j + l + k i jl + k jl + i + k li + j + k + ik + l + j ikl + j li + k + j kl + i + j i jkl jk + l + i jkl + i l j + k + i kl + j + i { i j + k + l i j + kl kl + i + j { ik + j + l + ik + jl jl + i + k { il + j + k il + jk jk + i + l K l K l jk,i = P i jp jk K l K l ki, j = P ikp jk K l K k i j,l = P kl K l K k jl,i = P klp i j P jk K l K k li, j = P klp ik P jk K l K j ik,l = P ikp jk P kl K l K j li,k = P ikp jk P kl P i j P jk K l K j kl,i = P ikp jk P kl P ik P jk K l K i jk,l = P i jp jk P kl K l K i l j,k = P i jp jk P kl P ik P jk K l K i kl, j = P i jp jk P kl P i j P jk K l H l H kl,i j = P ik P jl H l H ik, jl = P ik P jk H l H jl,ik = P ik P jk P ik P jl H l H il, jk = P i j P jk P ik P jl H l H jk,il = P i j P jk H l. PoSXXXIV BWNP4

In the following we derive the FY equations. The bound state of four identical particles which interact via pairwise forces V i j i j i j, ik, il, jk, jl and kl is given by the Schrödinger equation which reads in integral form [4, 5]: Ψ = G V i j Ψ. i< j Here the free four-body propagator is given by G = E H, and H stands for the free Hamiltonian. Introducing Yakubovsky components Ψ = ψ i j, with ψ i j = G V i j Ψ leads to the six coupled integral equations: ψ i j = G t i j ψ kl. kl i j The operator t i j describes the two-body t matrix in the two-body subsystem i j. We can rewrite Eq.. as: ψ i j = G t i j ψ ik + ψ il + ψ jk + ψ jl + ψ kl.4 Among various possibilities to decompose ψ i j into three FY components we choose the following one: K l = G t i j ψ ik + ψ jk Ki j,l k = G t i j ψ il + ψ jl H l = G t i j ψ kl.5 The FY component K l H l belongs to a + + partition. They fulfill the following relation: ψ i j = K l + K i j,l k + H l.6 It is easily seen that every ψ i j component contains two + type chains and one + type chain, therefore the total wave function Ψ contains twelve different + type chains and six + type chains. So altogether one has eighteen FY components. If we consider identical particles here bosons, since we are omitting spin, the four-body wave function Ψ has to be totally symmetric. As a consequence all twelve components of + type are identical in their functional form and only the particles are permuted. The same is true for the six components of + type. Thus it is sufficient to consider only two independent FY components corresponding to the + and + partitions, PoSXXXIV BWNP4 K = K l H = H l.7 After the straightforward derivation the 8 coupled FY components shrink to two coupled FY equations: ] K l = G t i j P[ + P kl K l + H l ] H l = G t i j P[ + P kl K l + H l.8

where P i j is the permutation operator between the i th and j th particle, and P = P i j P jk + P ik P jk P = P ik P jl.9 The total four-body wave function is then given as: [ ] Ψ = + P + P kl P + P + P kl K l + H l = + + PP kl + P K l + + P + P H l. The symmetry property of K under exchange of particles i and j, and H under separate exchanges of particles i, j and k,l guarantee that Ψ is totally symmetric.. Representation of Faddeev-Yakubovsky Equations in Momentum Space In this section for simplification of notation, we use the labels,, and 4 for particles. So, we can rewrite Eq..8 as: ] K = G t P[ + P 4 K + H ] H = G t P[ + P 4 K + H. In order to solve the coupled Eqs.. in momentum space one should project them into standard sets of Jacobi momenta, corresponding to both + u u u and + v v v chains. The standard Jacobi momenta for 4B system are defined as: u = k k u = k k + k u = 4 k 4. k + k + k PoSXXXIV BWNP4 v = k k v = k + k k + k 4 v = k k 4. Since we are going to study the weakly 4B bound state and we just consider the s-wave channel contribution, we introduce the projection operators corresponding to each Jacobi momenta set in partial wave representation as: u = u u u v = v v v.4 4

where the projection operators follow the completeness relation: D A A A =.5 where A indicates each one of u and v vectors and D A A da A da A da. Clearly the projection operator u is adequate to expand FY component K and correspondingly the projection operator v is adequate for H. Let us now represent the coupled equations, Eq.., with respect to the projection operators which have been introduced in Eq..4: u K = u G tp + P 4 K + u G tp H v H = v G t P + P 4 K + v G t P H.6 It is convenient to insert again the completeness relations between permutation operators, it results: u K = D u u G tp u u K + D u D u u G tp u u P 4 u u K + D u D v u G tp u u v v H v H = D v D u v G t P v v u u K + D v D u D u v G t P v v u u P 4 u u K + D v v G t P v v H.7 For evaluating the coupled equations, Eq..7, we need to evaluate the following matrix elements: u G tp u.8 v G t P v.9 u P 4 u, u P 4 u. u v, v u. PoSXXXIV BWNP4 For evaluating the first term, Eq..8, we should insert again a completeness relation between the two-body t matrix operator and the permutation operator P as: u G tp u = G u,u,u D u u t u u P u. where the matrix elements of the two-body t matrix for a separable potential and permutation operator P are evaluated separately as: u t u = δ u u δ u u 4π χu χu τε u u ε = E u 4m u m. 5

u P u = Π u,u = Π u,u = δ u Π u,u dx u u + u = 4 u + u = 4 u u δ u Π u,u + u + u u x + u + u u u δ u u u x.4 For evaluation the matrix elements of permutation operator P we have used the relation between Jacobi momenta in different two-body subsystems, 4,, 4 and, 4. Inserting Eqs.. and.4 into Eq.. leads to: u G tp u = 4π G u,u,u χu τε δ dx χ Π u,u u Π u,u Representation of the second term, Eq..9, follows the similar steps: u δ u u u.5 v G t P v = G v,v,v D v v t v v P v.6 The matrix elements of the two-body t matrix and the permutation operator P are evaluated as: v t v = δ v v v ε = E v m v m v P v = δ v v v δ v v v δ v v v Inserting Eqs..7 and.8 into Eq..6 leads to: 4π χv χv τε δ v v v v G t P v = 4π G v,v,v χv χv τε δ v v v δ v v v.7.8.9 For the evaluation of the third term, Eq.., we should use the relation between Jacobi momenta in different chains,4 and 4,, which leads to: u P 4 u = δ u u δ u u dx Π u,u,x δ u Π u,u,x u u Π u,u,x = u + 8 9 u = 9 u + 64 8 u + 6 7 u u x Π u,u,x = u = u + 9 u u u x. u PoSXXXIV BWNP4 6

And finally for evaluation the fourth terms, Eq.., we should use the relation between Jacobi momenta in two naturally different chains,4 and,4, which leads to: u v = δ v u δ v v dx Π 4 u,u,x δ v Π 5 u,u,x v v Π 4 u,u,x = u + u = 4 u + 4 9 u + u u x Π u,u,x = u u = u + 4 9 u 4 u u x. v u = δ u v u Π 6 v,v,x = v + v = Π 7 v,v,x = v v = δ u Π 6 v,v dx u v + v + v v x,x δ u Π 7 v,v,x v + 4 v v v x. Finally inserting Eqs..5,.9,. and. in Eq..7 yields: K u,u,u = 4π G u,u,u χu τε [ du u dx χ Π u,u K Π u,u,u,u + + du u du u dx dx dx χ Π u,u K Π u,u,π u,u,x,π u,u,x dx χ Π u,u H Π u,u,π4 u,u,x,π 5 u,u,x ] u PoSXXXIV BWNP4 H v,v,v = 4π G v,v,v χv τε [ dv v dx χ v K v,π 6 v,v,x,π 7 v,v,x + dv v χ v H v,v,v ]. By considering the following definitions of Yakubovsky components: K u,u,u = G u,u,u χu K u,u H v,v,v = G v,v,v χv H v,v.4 7

the final form of coupled Yakubovsky integral equations can be obtained as: K u,u = 4π τε [ du u + du u dx χ Π u,u χ Π u,u G Π u,u,u,u K u,u dx dx χ Π u,u χ Π u,u Π u,u,x,π u,u,x G Π u,u,π u,u,x,π u,u,x K + du u dx dx χ Π u,u χ Π u,u G Π u,u,π4 u,u,x,π 5 u,u,x H Π 4 u,u,x,π 5 u,u,x ] H v,v = 4π τε [ dv v + dx χ v χ v G v,π 6 v,v,x,π 7 v,v,x K 4. Zero-range interaction Π 6 v,v,x,π 7 v,v,x dv v χ v χ v G v,v,v H v,v ].5 The momentum space representation of a zero-range interaction V r = π λ δr, characterized by the two-body coupling constant λ is as: p V p = λ p χ χ p ; p χ χp = d r e ip.r δr =. 4. PoSXXXIV BWNP4 The two-body t-matrix, tε = χ τε χ, can be obtained by analytical solution of the inhomogeneous Lippmann-Schwinger equation as: [ τε = λ ] d p ε p 4. The coupling constant λ is fixed by one physical input, for example, the pole position of the two-body scattering amplitude at B ; λ = d p B p 4. The above value of λ, when substituted in Eq. 4., provides the cancelation of linear divergence of momentum integral and leads to renormalized two-body t-matrix as: 8

τε = B π ε = π a ε. 4.4 5. Coupled Yakubovsky Integral Equations for Zero-range interaction The coupled integral equations.5 can be simplified for a zero range interaction χp =. If we ignore the fourth particle, the coupled Yakubovsky integral equations can be simplified to Faddeev integral equation. The subtraction technique can be used to be able to obtain the converged results for binding energy of trimer from solution of Faddeev integral equation by using a zero range interaction. To this aim one need a three-body parameter, µ, and the regularization of the momentum integration is done through the substitution of the free three-body Green s function by a subtracted form: G = E H µ H Now, by adding the fourth particle to the three-body system, one need also to regularize the new terms which appear in presence of fourth particle in coupled Yakubovsky integral equations. To this aim one can introduce a new parameter, i.e. four-body scale µ 4, to regularize these new terms and the free four-body Green s function can be substituted by a subtracted form: G 4 = E H µ 4 H So, for regularization of the first term of coupled integral equation.5, which describe the B subsystem i jk, one can use a three-body scale and for other terms, which appear in presence of fourth particle, a new four-body scale can be used. By these considerations, he subtracted form of the Yakubovsky integral equations are given by: K u,u = 4π τε du u dx [ Π u,u,u,u K u,u G + + 5. 5. dx G 4 Π u,u,π u,u,x,π u,u,x K Π u,u,x,π u,u,x dx G 4 Π u,u,π4 u,u,x,π 5 u,u,x H Π 4 u,u,x,π 5 u,u,x ] H v,v = 4π τε [ dxg 4 dv v v,π 6 v,v,x,π 7 v,v,x K Π 6 v,v,x,π 7 v,v,x +G 4 v,v,v H v,v ] 5. PoSXXXIV BWNP4 9

The coupled integral equations 5. have been successfully solved for four-boson system and similar to three-boson case a scaling plot has been obtained which describe the universal tetramers [6, 7, 8]. Acknowledgments We acknowledge partial financial support from the Brazilian agencies Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. References [] W. Glöckle, The quantum mechanical few-body problem Springer, Berlin, 98. [] A. Nogga, H. Kamada, and W. Glöckle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 944. [] A. Nogga, H. Kamada, W. Glöckle, and B. R. Barrett, Phys. Rev. C 65, 54. [4] and S. Bayegan, Few Body Syst. 4, 7 7. [5], L. Tomio, and S. Bayegan, Phys. Rev. C 8, 544. [6] T. Frederico, L. Tomio, A. Delfino, M.R. Hadizadeh, and M.T. Yamashita, Few Body Syst. 5, 87. [7], M. T. Yamashita, Lauro Tomio, A. Delfino, T. Frederico; Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 54. [8], M. T. Yamashita, Lauro Tomio, A. Delfino, T. Frederico; Phys. Rev. A 85, 6. PoSXXXIV BWNP4