SONGS SSC. Tom Freeman GeoPentech PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Similar documents
John Shaw CRUSTAL DEFORMATION MODEL: OBLIQUE CONVERGENCE IN THE INNER CALIFORNIA BORDERLANDS ACCOMMODATED BY ACTIVE STRIKE-SLIP AND REVERSE FAULTS

Overview of the Seismic Source Characterization for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

Mark Legg COASTAL DEFORMATION AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION OFFSHORE SAN ONOFRE

EVALUATION OF TSUNAMI RISK FOR COASTAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIES. Appendix A - Figures

Overview of Seismic Source Characterization for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant

SONGS Seismic Research Projects

SCEC Community Fault and Velocity Models and how they might contribute to the DCPP seismic hazard assessment. Andreas Plesch Harvard University

Appendix O: Gridded Seismicity Sources

EARTHQUAKE BAY THURSDAY FEBRUARY 16, 2017

Kinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements

involved in multiple state-wide re-evaluations of seismic risk by the State of California.

Modelling Subduction Zone Seismogenic Hazards in Southeast Asia for Seismic Hazard Assessments

8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

CHAPTER 1 BASIC SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE TERMINOLGY. Earth Formation Plate Tectonics Sources of Earthquakes...

Manila subduction zone

Geo736: Seismicity and California s Active Faults Introduction

DCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Fault Models SSC TI Team Evaluation Hans AbramsonWard

San Andreas and Other Fault Sources; Background Source

Karl Mueller QUATERNARY RIFT FLANK UPLIFT OF THE PENINSULAR RANGES IN BAJA AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY REMOVAL OF MANTLE LITHOSPHERE

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C January 11, 2016

The Seismogenic Thickness of the Southern California Crust

Annual Report 2000 Comparing Mechanical and Geodetic Models of Los Angeles Basin Faults. Amherst, MA Los Angeles, CA 90089

Diablo Canyon SSHAC Level 3 Study

Overview of Seismic PHSA Approaches with Emphasis on the Management of Uncertainties

John Baldwin and Brian Gray Lettis Consultants International, Inc. Alexis Lavine AMEC Josh Goodman and Janet Sowers Fugro Consultants, Inc.

Splay Fault Considerations

Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March

2016 SCEC ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT - SCEC

7 Ground Motion Models

Jocelyn Karen Campbell

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

Seismic Source Characterization in Siting New Nuclear Power Plants in the Central and Eastern United States

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Study Study Plan Section 16.6

GEM's community tools for probabilistic seismic hazard modelling and calculation

RECORD OF REVISIONS. Page 2 of 17 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.06, Rev. 0

Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

Model Uncertainties of the 2002 Update of California Seismic Hazard Maps

Lab 1: Plate Tectonics April 2, 2009

Precarious Rocks Methodology and Preliminary Results

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Jack Loveless Department of Geosciences Smith College

National Seismological Centre: An Overview, Prospects and Challenges

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

BEM Model of slip on the Channel Islands Thrust, CA

Anomalous Seismicity in the San Diego Coastal Region Thomas H. Heaton U.S. Geological Survey 525 S. Wilson Ave. Pasadena, CA Abstract This

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2)

The Length to Which an Earthquake will go to Rupture. University of Nevada, Reno 89557

Lack of continuity of the San Andreas Fault in southern California: Three-dimensional fault models and earthquake scenarios

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

Seismic Risk in California Is Changing

WESTERN STATES SEISMIC POLICY COUNCIL POLICY RECOMMENDATION Definitions of Recency of Surface Faulting for the Basin and Range Province

Integration of Seismic and Seismological Data Interpretation for Subsurface Structure Identification

Magnitude 7.1 PERU. There are early reports of homes and roads collapsed leaving one dead and several dozen injured.

APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis E. Geology and Soils

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY

Earthquake Locations in the Inner Continental Borderland, Offshore Southern California

Deterministic Generation of Broadband Ground Motions! with Simulations of Dynamic Ruptures on Rough Faults! for Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Analysis

STRIKE SLIP SPLAY USING DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODELS

Seismic Issues for California's Nuclear Power Plants. Norman Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley

Active Tectonics. Earthquakes, Uplift, and Landscape. Edward A. Keller University of California, Santa Barbara

Hosgri-San Simeon Fault Zone Geologic Slip Rate

50 or 500? Current Issues in Estimating Fault Rupture Length. David P. Schwartz USGS Menlo Park

Earth Science, (Tarbuck/Lutgens) Chapter 10: Mountain Building

SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES GROUND MOTION CHARACTERIZATION SSHAC LEVEL 3. Workshop #1 Proceedings. Version 1.1

External Grant Award Number 04HQGR0058 IMPROVED THREE-DIMENSIONAL VELOCITY MODELS AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS FOR CALIFORNIA

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

San Gorgonio Pass Special Fault Study Area

Fault Specific, Dynamic Rupture Scenarios for Strong Ground Motion Prediction

Convergent plate boundary.

Measurements in the Creeping Section of the Central San Andreas Fault

Article from: Risk Management. March 2009 Issue 15

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 4: GPS strain analysis examples Student exercise

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

State of Stress in Seismic Gaps Along the SanJacinto Fault

Azimuth with RH rule. Quadrant. S 180 Quadrant Azimuth. Azimuth with RH rule N 45 W. Quadrant Azimuth

Lecture # 6. Geological Structures

RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT SAN ANDREAS FAULT SYSTEM: - TECTONICS, GEOLOGY, FAULT DYNAMICS, AND HAZARDS -

THE REVISED 2002 CALIFORNIA PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS JUNE 2003

Updated Graizer-Kalkan GMPEs (GK13) Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization SSHAC Level 3 Workshop 2 Berkeley, CA October 23, 2013

Description of faults

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

crustal structure experiment beneath Wairarapa - Wellington area: results from SAHKE

Study on the feature of surface rupture zone of the west of Kunlunshan pass earthquake ( M S 811) with high spatial resolution satellite images

Surface Faulting and Deformation Assessment & Mitigation

Plate Tectonics. Structure of the Earth

NAME HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #4 MATERIAL COVERS CHAPTERS 19, 20, 21, & 2

Global Tectonics. Kearey, Philip. Table of Contents ISBN-13: Historical perspective. 2. The interior of the Earth.

Dynamic Crust Practice

The Offshore Palos Verdes Fault Zone near San Pedro, Southern California

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

Once you have opened the website with the link provided choose a force: Earthquakes

1. Name at least one place that the mid-atlantic Ridge is exposed above sea level.

Case Study 1: 2014 Chiang Rai Sequence

Transcription:

SONGS SSC Tom Freeman GeoPentech PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do you have splay faults or overlapping segments? Do you have complex multi-segment ruptures with different rakes/dips along strike? What is the largest magnitude in your sources (due to linked faults)? What is the range of dip angles (min & max) and faulting styles?

Tectonic Setting - Broad zone of deformation related to transition from transtensional to transpressional plate boundary - Deformation is distribution across many faults - Strike-slip and reverse/thrust faulting - How deformation is distributed is SSC SSHAC topic

SONGS PSHAs Past PSHAs: 1995, 2001, 2010 Efforts focused on key sources Current PSHA: Sources within 200 miles to be considered Per 10 CFR 100 Appendix A, 203 sources

PAST SONGS PSHAs Key Sources: Newport Inglewood/ Rose Canyon (NI/RC) Oceanside Blind Thrust (OBT) Palos Verdes/Coronado Bank Elsinore San Diego Trough San Jacinto San Andreas San Clemente

2010 PSHA & UCERF2 San Gorgonio Knot Malibu Coast Fault Legend SONGS Type A Faults Type B Faults Type C Zones from UCERF 2 Oceanside Thrust Non-Designated (ND) Faults(2) Oceanside Thrust from Sorlien et al. (2009b) NOTES: (1) Map is modified from Plesch et al. (2007), WGCEP (2008), Sorlien et al. (2009b), USGS (2008, 2009), and Conrad et al. (2010). (2) Parameters for faults being considered for development in future UCERF models. Fault traces from USGS (2009), Sorlien et al. (2009b) and Conrad et al. (2010). (3) Faults used in UCERF 2, USGS (2008), and SONGS 2010 PSHA are identified with black and bold letters. PRELIMINARY RESULTS March 2013

2010 SONGS Fault Models FM 1 Newport-Inglewood [Offshore] OBT is subsidiary Newport-Inglewood [Onshore] Rose Canyon San Joaquin Hills Carlsbad Palos Verdes Coronado Bank San Diego Trough Elsinore San Jacinto San Andreas Others Background FM 2 Oceanside Blind Thrust (OBT) N-I [Offshore] is subsidiary Newport-Inglewood [Onshore] Rose Canyon San Joaquin Hills Carlsbad Palos Verdes Coronado Bank San Diego Trough Elsinore San Jacinto San Andreas Others Background

2010 PSHA Seismic Sources Fault Name Oceanside Blind Thrust (OBT) Newport Inglewood/Rose Canyon (NI/RC) Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude (Mw) Fault Mechanism Basis 6 7.1 to 7.6 Reverse 2010 PSHA 8 6.8 to 7.5 Strike-slip USGS, 2009 Palos Verdes/Coronado Bank 32 7.6 to 8.0 Strike-slip UCERF2 Elsinore 38 7.0 to 8.2 Strike-slip UCERF2 San Diego Trough 46 7.0 Strike-slip USGS, 2009 San Jacinto 70 6.7 to 8.3 Strike-slip UCERF2 San Andreas 92 6.9 to 8.5 Strike-slip UCERF2 San Clemente 94 7.2 Strike-slip USGS, 2009 Remaining Sources > 100 6.4 to 7.4 Strike-slip & Reverse UCERF2

2010 PSHA Source Contribution for PGA NI/RC OBT source contributes over 99% of total hazard contribution at AFE = 10-4 NI/RC OBT source contributes 100% of total hazard contribution at AFE = 10-6

Driving SSC Issue

Vintage Seismic Data NI/RC? PRELIMINARY RESULTS March 2013

NI/RC is Primary west OBT is Subsidiary SONGS east 8 km NI/RC NI/RC?

west OBT is Primary NI/RC is Subsidiary SONGS east NI/RC??

Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do you have splay faults or overlapping segments? Do you have complex multi-segment ruptures with different rakes/dips along strike? What is the largest magnitude in your sources (due to linked faults)? What is the range of dip angles (min & max) and faulting styles?

Nazareth & Hauksson (2004) Seismogenic Depths

Shallow crustal nucleations Adjacent offshore areas 6-10 km depths Adjacent coastal areas 7-16 km depths

Seismogenic Depths Past analyses considered up to 17 km Deep 30 km nucleations? will re-assess in current SSC SSHAC

Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do you have splay faults or overlapping segments? Do you have complex multi-segment ruptures with different rakes/dips along strike? What is the largest magnitude in your sources (due to linked faults)? What is the range of dip angles (min & max) and faulting styles?

Overlapping Fault Models OBT & NI/RC Simplified geometries Either may have splays OBT Northern Segment SONGS OBT Southern Segment

Splay Faults

Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do you have splay faults or overlapping segments? Do you have complex multi-segment ruptures with different rakes/dips along strike? What is the largest magnitude in your sources (due to linked faults)? What is the range of dip angles (min & max) and faulting styles?

Complex Linkages: OBT + NI/RC Two segments of OBT OBT Northern Segment OBT Southern Segment Both segments possibly linked to high-angle splays OBT Northern Segment OBT Southern Segment SONGS

Complex Linkages: OBT + NI/RC Three segments of NI/RC NI-Onshore NI-Offshore RC Segments possibly linked to lowangle splays OBT Northern Segment OBT Southern Segment SONGS

Complex Linkages: OBT + NI/RC OBT+NI/RC linkage Minor changes in fault strike Significant changes in fault rake OBT Northern Segment OBT Southern Segment SONGS

Complex Ruptures & Splay Faults UCERF3 more complex and super linkages Potential significant changes in fault strike Potential significant changes in fault rake UCERF3 Grand Inversion inhibits infeasible linkages Carlsbad Trend SJH SONGS OBT Northern Segment OBT Southern Segment

Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do you have splay faults or overlapping segments? Do you have complex multi-segment ruptures with different rakes/dips along strike? What is the largest magnitude in your sources (due to linked faults)? What is the range of dip angles (min & max) and faulting styles?

2010 PSHA Seismic Sources Fault Name Oceanside Blind Thrust (OBT) Newport Inglewood/Rose Canyon (NI/RC) Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude (Mw) Fault Mechanism Basis 6 7.1 to 7.6 Reverse 2010 PSHA 8 6.8 to 7.5 Strike-slip USGS, 2009 Palos Verdes/Coronado Bank 32 7.6 to 8.0 Strike-slip UCERF2 Elsinore 38 7.0 to 8.2 Strike-slip UCERF2 San Diego Trough 46 7.0 Strike-slip USGS, 2009 San Jacinto 70 6.7 to 8.3 Strike-slip UCERF2 San Andreas 92 6.9 to 8.5 Strike-slip UCERF2 San Clemente 94 7.2 Strike-slip USGS, 2009 Remaining Sources > 100 6.4 to 7.4 Strike-slip & Reverse UCERF2

Complex Linkages: UCERF3 What about new UCERF3 super linkages? Will affect maximum magnitudes Under evaluation in SONGS SSC SSHAC Carlsbad Trend SJH SONGS OBT Northern Segment OBT Southern Segment

Future PSHA Seismic Sources? Fault Name Oceanside Blind Thrust (OBT) Newport Inglewood/Rose Canyon (NI/RC) Palos Verdes/Coronado Bank Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude (Mw) Fault Mechanism Basis 6 7.1 to 7.6 (8+?) Reverse 2010 PSHA 8 6.8 to 7.5 (8+?) Strike-slip USGS, 2009 32 7.6 to 8.0 (8+?) Strike-slip UCERF2 Elsinore 38 7.0 to 8.2 (8+?) Strike-slip UCERF2 San Diego Trough 46 7.0 (to 7.8?) Strike-slip USGS, 2009 San Jacinto 70 6.7 to 8.3 (8+?) Strike-slip UCERF2 San Andreas 92 6.9 to 8.5 (8+?) Strike-slip UCERF2 San Clemente 94 7.2 (8+?) Strike-slip USGS, 2009 Remaining Sources > 100 6.4 to 7.4 (8+?) Strike-slip & Reverse UCERF2

Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do you have splay faults or overlapping segments? Do you have complex multi-segment ruptures with different rakes/dips along strike? What is the largest magnitude in your sources (due to linked faults)? What is the range of dip angles (min & max) and faulting styles?

Style of Faulting & Range of Dips STYLE RAKE min DIP max DIP STRIKE-SLIP Newport-Inglewood / Rose Canyon Simplified: RIGHT LATERAL 180 Actual? with convergence across restraints ~150? ~80 90 LOW-ANGLE REVERSE (THRUST) Oceanside Blind Thrust Simplified: THRUST 90 Actual? OBLIQUE? reverse right-lat? ~120? styles of deformation under evaluation in SONGS SSC SSHAC ~15 ~30

Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do you have splay faults or overlapping segments? Do you have complex multi-segment ruptures with different rakes/dips along strike? What is the largest magnitude in your sources (due to linked faults)? What is the range of dip angles (min & max) and faulting styles?

QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION

References Bird, P., 2003, An updated digital model of plate boundaries: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 4, no. 3, p. 1027, doi:10.1029/2001gc000252. Conrad, J., 2013, personal communication to P. Umhoefer. Conrad, J.E., Ryan, H.F., and Sliter, R.W., 2010, Tracing active faulting in the Inner Continental Borderland, Southern California, using new highresolution seismic reflection and bathymetric data [abstract]: Seismological Society of America 2010 Annual Meeting, Seismological Research Letters, v.81, no. 2, p. 347. GeoPentech, Inc., 2010, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Seismic Hazard Assessment Program: 2010 Seismic Hazard Analysis Report, prepared by GeoPentech, Inc. for Southern California Edison Co., 74 pp. plus appendices. Kent, G., 2012, personal communication to S. Duke. Nazareth, J.J., and Hauksson, E., 2004, The seismogenic thickness of the southern California crust: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 94, no. 3, p. 940-960. Plesch, A., Shaw, J.H., Benson, C., et al., 2007, Community Fault Model (CFM) for southern California: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 97, no. 6, p. 1793-1802. SCE, 2001, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Seismic Hazard Study of Postulated Blind Thrust Faults, prepared by Geomatrix Consultants, GeoPentech, and Southern California Edison for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 26 December 2001, 165 pp. SCE, 1995, Seismic Hazard at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, prepared by Risk Engineering, Inc. for Southern California Edison Co., 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, California 91770, 25 August 1995, 340 pp. Sorlien, C.C., Campbell, B.A., and Seeber, L., 2009b, Geometry, kinematics, and activity of a young mainland-dipping fold and thrust belt: Newport Beach to San Clemente, California, USDI/USGS Award No. 08HQGR0103 Final Technical Report, 25 pp. USGS, 2009, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, accessed 25 October 2010, from USGS website, [http//earthquakes.usgs.gov/regional/qfaults/]. USGS, 2008, Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, prepared by Petersen, M. D., et al.: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2008-1128. U.S.NRC, 2012, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 100, Appendix A, available at [http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/], accessed October 2012. WGCEP, 2012, in review, The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3.1 (UCERF3.1), prepared by Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, accessed 5 February 2013 at [http://wgcep.org/ucerf3pt1]. WGCEP, 2008, The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF2), prepared by 2007 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2007-1437 and California Geological Survey Special Report 203.