Short-Ranged Central and Tensor Correlations. Nuclear Many-Body Systems. Reaction Theory for Nuclei far from INT Seattle

Similar documents
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE AB INITIO

New Frontiers in Nuclear Structure Theory

Microscopic calculation of the. in the FMD approach. 3 He(α,γ) 7 Be capture reaction

Structure of light hypernuclei in the framework of Fermionic Molecular Dynamics

Matrix Elements and Few-Body Calculations within the Unitary Correlation Operator Method

Nucleon-nucleon interaction

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 1 Nov 2018

Hartree-Fock and Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov with Modern Effective Interactions

Effective interactions in the delta-shell model

Pairing in Nuclear and Neutron Matter Screening effects

Nuclear physics: a laboratory for many-particle quantum mechanics or From model to theory in nuclear structure physics

RG & EFT for nuclear forces

Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory

Spin Cut-off Parameter of Nuclear Level Density and Effective Moment of Inertia

Few Body Methods in Nuclear Physics - Lecture I

Renormalization Group Methods for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 3 Apr 2014

Coupled-cluster theory for nuclei

Simplifying the Nuclear Many-Body Problem with Low-Momentum Interactions

Unitary Correlation Operator Method and Similarity Renormalization Group: Connections and Differences

RFSS: Lecture 8 Nuclear Force, Structure and Models Part 1 Readings: Nuclear Force Nuclear and Radiochemistry:

Towards chiral three-nucleon forces in heavy nuclei

Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions

Nuclear electric dipole moment in the Gaussian expansion method

AFDMC Method for Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Astrophysics

Coupled-cluster theory for medium-mass nuclei

Tritium β decay in pionless EFT

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540

Nuclear structure Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University

Mean-field concept. (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1

Nuclear Structure for the Crust of Neutron Stars

Shell evolution in neutron rich nuclei

Unitary-model-operator approach to nuclear many-body problems

Time dependent coupled-cluster method

The nature of superfluidity in the cold atomic unitary Fermi gas

Tensor-optimized antisymmetrized molecular dynamics (TOAMD) with bare forces for light nuclei

Comparison of Nuclear Configuration Interaction Calculations and Coupled Cluster Calculations

Effective Field Theory for light nuclear systems

Neutron Halo in Deformed Nuclei

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 6 Models of the Nucleus Liquid Drop, Fermi Gas, Shell

c E If photon Mass particle 8-1

The semi-empirical mass formula, based on the liquid drop model, compared to the data

Light Nuclei from chiral EFT interactions

TRIUMF. Three-body forces in nucleonic matter. Weakly-Bound Systems in Atomic and Nuclear Physics. Kai Hebeler (TRIUMF) INT, Seattle, March 11, 2010

New Trends in the Nuclear Shell Structure O. Sorlin GANIL Caen

Correlations derived from modern nucleon-nucleon potentials

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540

Nuclei as Bound States

Similarity Renormalization Groups (SRG) for nuclear forces Nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics

Hybridization of tensor-optimized and high-momentum antisymmetrized molecular dynamics for light nuclei with bare interaction

Central density. Consider nuclear charge density. Frois & Papanicolas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 133 (1987) QMPT 540

Toward a unified description of equilibrium and dynamics of neutron star matter

Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of medium mass nuclei

Nuclear structure I: Introduction and nuclear interactions

Nuclear structure from chiral-perturbation-theory two- plus three-nucleon interactions

RG & EFT for nuclear forces

Direct reactions methodologies for use at fragmentation beam energies

Three-Body Bound State Calculations by Using Three-Dimensional Low Momentum Interaction V low k

PHL424: Nuclear Shell Model. Indian Institute of Technology Ropar

BINDING ENERGY AND SINGLE-PARTICLE ENERGIES IN THE 16 O REGION

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Structure Decay Data: Theory and Evaluation August Introduction to Nuclear Physics - 1

Toward consistent relativistic description of pairing in infinite matter and finite nuclei

The No-Core Shell Model

Variatonal description of continuum states

Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 2

AMD. Skyrme ( ) 2009/03/ / 22

Coexistence phenomena in neutron-rich A~100 nuclei within beyond-mean-field approach

RPA and QRPA calculations with Gaussian expansion method

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

Lisheng Geng. Ground state properties of finite nuclei in the relativistic mean field model

Quantitative understanding nuclear structure and scattering processes, based on underlying NN interactions.

Few-nucleon contributions to π-nucleus scattering

Nuclear Landscape not fully known

Translationally Invariant Treatment of Light Nuclei

Few- Systems. Selected Topics in Correlated Hyperspherical Harmonics. Body. A. Kievsky

Single-particle spectral function of the Λ-hyperon in finite nuclei

Electromagentic Reactions and Structure of Light Nuclei

Open quantum systems

Title. Author(s)Itagaki, N.; Oertzen, W. von; Okabe, S. CitationPhysical Review C, 74: Issue Date Doc URL. Rights.

Physics 2203, 2011: Equation sheet for second midterm. General properties of Schrödinger s Equation: Quantum Mechanics. Ψ + UΨ = i t.

Part III: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem

Recent Developments and Applications of Integral Transforms in Few- and Many-Body Physics

Spin-Orbit Interactions in Nuclei and Hypernuclei

Lesson 5 The Shell Model

Lecture Models for heavy-ion collisions (Part III): transport models. SS2016: Dynamical models for relativistic heavy-ion collisions

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 24 May 2011

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 8 (10/4/06) Neutron-Proton Scattering

Mixing Quantum and Classical Mechanics: A Partially Miscible Solution

The Nuclear Many-Body Problem

Nuclear Forces / DFT for Nuclei III

Lattice Simulations with Chiral Nuclear Forces

Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems

Von Schalen, Clustern und Halos

Nuclear Forces - Lecture 1 - R. Machleidt University of Idaho

Study of the tensor correlation using a mean-field-type model. Satoru Sugimoto Kyoto University

Three-nucleon forces and shell structure of neutron-rich Ca isotopes

1 r 2 sin 2 θ. This must be the case as we can see by the following argument + L2

NN-Correlations in the spin symmetry energy of neutron matter

Fermionic Molecular Dynamics

Transcription:

Short-Ranged Central and Tensor Correlations in Nuclear Many-Body Systems Reaction Theory for Nuclei far from Stability @ INT Seattle September 6-, Hans Feldmeier, Thomas Neff, Robert Roth

Contents Motivation Unitary Correlation Operator Central Correlations Tensor Correlations Determination of Correlator Many-Body Calculations Interaction in Momentum-Space Momentum Distributions No-Core Shell Model Calculations Fermionic Molecular Dynamics Summary and Outlook

Motivation Aim describe basic properties of nuclear system in terms of a realistic nucleon-nucleon interaction Many-Body State Φ realistic interaction H meson-exchange (Bonn), phenomenological (Argonne), χ-pt reproduce scattering data and deuteron properties feature short-ranged repulsion and strong tensor force mean-field calculations (with effective interactions) Φ H eff Φ (Slater determinant Φ ) describe bulk properties (energies, radii) well realistic interactions induce short-ranged central and tensor correlations, Slater determinants cannot describe these use realistic interactions Ansatz and include correlations with unitary correlation operator C in simple many-body states (shell-model, FMD) Φ C H C Φ

Unitary Transformation Unitary Transformation transform eigenvalue problem H ˆΨ n = En ˆΨ n with the unitary operator C ˆΨ n = C Ψ n, C = C pre-diagonalization include typical effects common to all states into the equivalent eigenvalue problem Ĥ Ψ n = (C H C ) Ψ n = En Ψ n Nuclear System unitary correlator admixes components from outside the model space Ψ n does not project on model space the nuclear system has different scales: long range (low momenta) can be described by mean-field (Slater determinant) short-range (high momenta) cannot be described by mean-field include short-range correlations by unitary transformation

The Unitary Correlation Operator Two-Body Correlations two-body generator C = e ig, G = i< j Cluster Expansion g i j correlated operators  = C A C are no longer operators with definite particle number decompose correlated operator into irreducible k-body operators  =  [] +  [] + Two-Body Approximation ˆT C = ˆT [] + ˆT [], ˆV C [] = ˆV correlation range should be smaller than mean distance of nucleons Correlator C should conserve translational, rotational and Galilei invariance cluster decomposition principle should be fulfilled Spin-Isospin Dependence nuclear interaction strongly depends on spin and isospin v = v S T Π S T S,T different correlations in the respective channels g = g S T Π S T S,T correlated interaction in two-body space ˆv = ( igs T e v S T e ig ) S T Π S T S,T

p r Central and Tensor Correlations r p C = C Ω C r p r = { r r ( r r p) + ( p r r p = p r + p Ω ) } r r, pω = r { l r r r r l} p Ω Central Correlations g r = { } pr s(r) + s(r)p r probability density shifted out of the repulsive core Tensor Correlations g Ω = ϑ(r) { 3 (σ p Ω )(σ r) + 3 (σ r)(σ p Ω ) } tensor force admixes other angular momenta S =, T = AV8 S =, T = AV8 replacements [fm 3 ].35.3.5..5..5 ρ () (r) ˆρ () (r) V [MeV] - AV8 v c (r) -..5..5..5 3. r [fm] [fm 3 ].35.3.5..5..5 ρ () (r) ˆρ () (r) V [MeV] ˆρ () L= () (r)ˆρ L= (r) - AV8 v c (r) v t (r) -..5..5..5 3. r [fm]..5..5..5 3. r [fm]..5..5..5 3. r [fm]

Central Correlations g replacements realistic interactions have short-range repulsion probability density of nucleons in the repulsive core strongly suppressed [fm 3 ].35.3.5..5..5 ρ () (r) ˆρ () (r) V [MeV] AV8..5..5..5 3. r [fm] - v c (r) AV8 -..5..5..5 3. r [fm] Radial Shift correlator shifts nucleons out of core radial shift generated by radial momentum p r r g r { } pr s(r) + s(r)p r, pr = ( i r + ) r Correlation Function use correlation function R ± (r) instead of shift function s(r) ± = R± (r) r dξ s(ξ), R ±(r) r ± s(r) Correlated Wave function X, r c r Φ = R (r) r R (r) X, R (r)ˆr Φ

Centrally Correlated Interaction Kinetic Energy [] ˆt = t ˆt [] = c r (t + t)c r (t + t) r + [ p r ˆµ Ω (r) + µ ˆµ r (r) + l r ˆµ r (r) p r ( 7R + (r) 4R +(r) R 4 ] + (r) ) R +(r) 3 [MeV ] 4 4 ˆµ Ω (r) ˆµ r (r)..5..5..5 3. r [fm] ˆµ r (r) = µ ( R +(r) ), [MeV] 5 5 5 5 75 û(r) 5..5..5..5 3. r [fm] ˆµ Ω (r) = µ ( r R + (r) ) Potential c ˆv b ˆv t ˆv r v c (R + (r)) r v b (R + (r)) l s r v t (R + (r)) s (ˆr, ˆr) V [MeV] 5 5 5 ˆv c (r) v c (r) 5..5..5..5 3. r [fm]

Tensor Correlations replacements tensor force admixes higher angular momenta [fm 3 ] S =, T =.35.3.5..5..5 ρ () (r) ˆρ () (r) V [MeV] ˆρ () L= () (r)ˆρ L= (r) AV8..5..5..5 3. r [fm] - ( + ) v c (r) v t (r) AV8 -..5..5..5 3. r [fm] Perpendicular Shift correlator aligns density with spin perpendicular shift generated by s (r, p Ω ) g Ω r ϑ(r)s (r, p Ω ), p = p r + p Ω s (r, p Ω ) = 3 (σ p Ω )(σ r) + 3 (σ r)(σ p Ω ) s (r, p Ω ) (J, )J (J)J (J +, )J (J, )J 3i J(J + ) (J, )J (J +, )J 3i J(J + ) Correlated Wave function r c Ω ϕ; (J, )J = ϕ(r) (J, )J r c Ω ϕ; (J, )J = cos ( θ (J) (r) ) ϕ(r) (J, )J ± sin ( θ (J) (r) ) ϕ(r) (J±, )J θ (J) (r) = 3 J(J + )ϑ(r)

Tensor Correlated Interaction Kinetic Energy (J, )J c r c Ω t r c Ω c r t r (J, )J c r cω t Ω cω r c tω ( cos ( θ (J) (R + (r)) )(J )(J +) µ R + (r) (J, )J r [ p r (J, )J r ˆµ r (r) + ] ˆµ r (r) p r + ( θ (J) (R + (r)) ) + û(r) µ + sin ( θ (J) (R + (r)) )(J±)(J±+) ) R + (r) µ ( (J )(J +) ) r (J, )J c r c Ω v c c Ω c r (J, )J r v c (R + (r)) Potential (J, )J c r c Ω v b c Ω c r (J, )J c r c Ω v t c Ω c r (J, )J r v b (R + (r)) ( cos ( θ (J) (R + (r)) ) (J, )J l s (J, )J (J, )J r + sin ( θ (J) (R + (r)) ) (J±, )J l s (J±, )J ) v t (R + (r)) ( cos ( θ (J) (R + (r)) ) (J, )J s (ˆr, ˆr) (J, )J ± cos ( θ (J) (R + (r)) ) sin ( θ (J) (R + (r)) ) (J, )J s (ˆr, ˆr) (J±, )J + sin ( θ (J) (R + (r)) ) (J±, )J s (ˆr, ˆr) (J±, )J )

Tensor Correlated Interaction Tensor Correlated Operators Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff cω ac Ω = eig Ω ae ig Ω = e L Ω a, L Ω = [ g Ω, ] s (l, l) = 3(σ l)(σ l) (σ σ )l. s (p Ω, p Ω ) = r s (p Ω, p Ω ) + s (l, l) s (ˆr, ˆr) [ gω, p r] = i ( p r ϑ (r) + ϑ ) (r)p r s (r, p Ω ) [ gω, [ [ g Ω, p ] ] r = ϑ (r) (8 + 6 l )Π + 45 l s + 3 ] s (l, l) [ gω, [ g Ω, [ g Ω, p ] ] ] r = [ gω, Π ] = [ gω, s (ˆr, ˆr) ] = iϑ(r)[ 4 Π 8 l s + 3 s (ˆr, ˆr) ] [ gω, l s ] = iϑ(r)[ s (p Ω, p Ω ) ] [ gω, l ] = iϑ(r)[ s (p Ω, p Ω ) ] [ gω, s (l, l) ] = iϑ(r)[ 7 s (p Ω, p Ω ) ] [ gω, s (p Ω, p Ω ) ] = iϑ(r)[ (96 l + 8)Π + (36 l + 53) l s + 5 s (l, l) ] evaluate e L Ω in truncated operator space use in HF or FMD calculations

Determination of Correlator determination of R + (r) und ϑ(r) by variational principle φ S T trial C r C Ω HC Ω C r φ S T trial min R + (r),ϑ(r) Central Correlations Tensor Correlations.5 AV8.8 AV8. replacements R+(r) r [fm].5..5 const 4 He R + (r) r.6.4. α β γ ϑ d (r) ϑ(r) S...5..5..5 r [fm] 3 4 5 r [fm] correlator depends only weakly on the trial state limit the range of the correlator

Many-Body Calculations Many-Body Trial States Slater determinant of harmonic oscillator states 4 He = (s) 4 6 O = (s) 4 (p) 4 Ca = (s) 4 (p) (s) 4 (d) Talmi Transformation harmonic oscillator allows separation of relative and cm motion n l m χ ξ ; n l m χ ξ [] ĥ n l m χ ξ ; n l m χ ξ = n l m NLM n l m NLM n l m nlm l n l m C( n l m l ξ ξ nn jmll s tm t m l m l m s m s NLM C( χ χ s m s ) C( χ χ s m s ) ( l s C m l m s j m t m t ) ( l s C m l m s ) C( ξ ξ t m t ) j n(ls) j, t ĥ [] m n (l s) j, t )

Many-Body Calculations two-body densities z [fm] C r C Ω x [fm] x [fm] x [fm] ρ () S,T (r r ) S =, M S =, T = central correlator shifts density out of the repulsive core tensor correlator aligns density with spin orientation both central and tensor correlations are essential for binding energies [A MeV] 6 4 4 4 He 6 O 4 Ca C r C Ω T V H 6

Many-Body Calculations Benchmark AV8 Binding Energy Contributions to the Binding Energy -5 4 He 4 He placements α β γ Eb [MeV] - -5 - -5-3 α β ref γ....3.4.5.6.7 r rms [fm] [MeV] - T T cm V b V t Vc....3.4.5.6.7 r rms [fm] extremely simple trial state, only one Slater determinant big cancelations between kinetic and potential energy, therefore binding energy very sensitive ref: PRC64 () 44

Many-Body Calculations Argonne V8 and Bonn-A Argonne V8 Eb [MeV] 4 6 8 β γ α VMC...4.6.8 r charge [fm] CC Exp 6 O 4 Ca Eb [MeV] 5 5 5 3 35 α β γ.4.6.8 3. 3. 3.4 3.6 r charge [fm] Exp VMC: PRC46 (99) 46 CC: PRC59 (999) 44 BHF: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys 45 () 43 Bonn-A Eb [MeV] 4 6 8 BHF...4.6.8 r charge [fm] Exp 6 O 4 Ca Eb [MeV] 5 5 5 3 35.4.6.8 3. 3. 3.4 3.6 r charge [fm] Exp simulation of threebody contributions by a three-body delta force δ(r i r k )δ(r k r j )

Interaction in Momentum Space klm Ĥ [] k l m = i l l M S channel d 3 x Y lm (ˆx) j l(kx) x Ĥ [] x j l (k x)y l m (ˆx) 3 S channel k Ĥ [] k, k V k [fm] replacements uncorrelated correlated, T =, ; L= - uncorrelated α - β Bonn A γ AV8 uncorrelated -3 fully correlated..5..5. k [fm ] correlated unique effective potential identical to V lowk Kuo, Schwenk, nucl-th/84 k Ĥ [] k, k V k [fm] S, T =, ; L= - -..5 Bonn A AV8-3...5..5. k [fm ] V lowk Cutoff Λ =.. fm

Bonn A Interaction in Momentum Space S : k V k replacements 5 4 3 k [fm ] k [fm ] 3 S : k V k PSfrag 4 replacements 5 3 5 4 3 k [fm ] 3 k [fm ] 4 5 bare potential S : k Ĥ [] k replacements 5 4 3 k [fm ] k [fm ] 3 S : k Ĥ [] k PSfrag 4 replacements 5 3 5 4 3 k [fm ] 3 k [fm ] 4 5 correlated interaction

Nucleon Momentum Distributions placements 4 He Bonn A AV8 α β γ radial VMC LDA ˆn(k)/A [fm 3 ]...... Bonn A 6 O 3 4 k [fm ] central+ tensor central 4 He Bonn A AV8 α β γ radial ˆn(k)/A [fm 3 ]...... Argonne V8 VMC LDA 6 O 3 4 k [fm ] correlations induce high-momentum components contributions of tensor correlations very big different correlator ranges relevant especially at the fermi surface

No-Core Shell Model MTV and ATS3M preliminary MTV - 4 He ATS3M - 4 He MTV ATS3M -5-5 Eb [MeV] - -5 - -5-3 ref 4 6 Eb [MeV] - -5 - -5-3 ref 4 He 3 a [fm ] 4 He 3 a [fm ] oscillator parameter Ω = Ma ref: PRC5 (995) 885 use OXBASH shell model code calculations from to 6 Ω possible

No-Core Shell Model AV8 preliminary Argonne V8-4 He α β γ -5-5 -5 ag replacements Eb [MeV] - -5 - -5-3 ref 4 6 Eb [MeV] - -5 - -5-3 Eb [MeV] - -5 - -5-3 4 He 3 a [fm ] 4 He 3 a [fm ] 4 He 3 a [fm ] oscillator parameter Ω = Ma use OXBASH shell-model code calculations from to 6 Ω possible energy benefits more from enlarged model-space for short-ranged correlator binding energy depends less on oscillator parameter for larger model spaces radii increase with enlarged model-spaces convergence should be tested with larger model-spaces

FMD Calculations Fermionic single Slater determinant Q = A ( q q A ) antisymmetrized A-body state Gaussian Wavepackets Molecular x q = c i exp { (x b i) } χ i ξ i a i i Dynamics Variational Principle ˆQ i d dt δ dt H ˆQ ˆQ ˆQ = Interaction Ĥ eff = Ĥ C + Ĥ correction Ĥ C = [ C r C Ω HC Ω C ] C r Ĥ C correlated interaction in two-body approximation Ĥ correction adjusted on doubly magic nuclei (compensates for missing three-body contributions of the correlated interaction and genuine three-body forces) Variation minimize Q Ĥ eff Q by variation of the parameters of the single-particle states

FMD Matrix Elements One-Body Matrix Elements Two-Body Matrix Elements o = ( q ) i q j ˆQ O [] ˆQ ˆQ [] O ˆQ ˆQ ˆQ = ˆQ ˆQ =: qk [] O q l olk k,l Gaussian Integrals k,l,m,n a qk, q l O [] q m, q n ao mk o nl G(x x ) = exp { (x x ) } κ ak b k, a l b l G ( κ ) 3/ ρ a m b m, a n b n = Rkm R ln exp{ } klmn α klmn + κ (α klmn + κ) α klmn = a k a m a k + a m + a l a n a, ρ l + a klmn = a mb k + a k b m n a k + a m a nb l + a l b n a l + a n, R km = a k b k a m b m

FMD Nuclear Chart Ti4 Sc4 Ca39 Ca4 Ca4 Ca4 Ca43 Ca44 Ca46 Ca48 -.5.5.5 (E E exp )/A [MeV] 8 Gaussian per single-particle state K38 K39 K4 K4 Ar36 Ar37 Ar38 Ar39 Ar4 Cl35 Cl36 Cl37 6 S3 S33 S34 S35 S36 4 Si4 P7 P3 Si6 Si7 Si8 Si9 Si3 Al4 Al5 Al6 Al7 Al8 Al9 Mg Mg3 Mg4 Mg5 Mg6 Mg7 Mg8 Na Na Na Na3 Na4 Na5 Na6 Na7 Ne8 Ne9 Ne Ne Ne Ne3 Ne4 Ne5 8 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 O O O O3 O4 F6 F7 F8 F9 F F F F3 N N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 N8 N9 N N N 8 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 O O O O3 O4 6 C9 C C C C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C 6 N N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 N8 N9 N N N C9 C C C C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C 4 B8 B9 B B B B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 Be7 Be8 Be9 Be Be Be Be3 Be4 4 B8 B9 B B B B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 Be7 Be8 Be9 Be Be Be Be3 Be4 Li5 Li6 Li7 Li8 Li9 Li Li He3 He4 He5 He6 He7 He8 H H3 He3 He4 He5 He6 He7 He8 H Li5 Li6 Li7 Li8 Li9 Li Li H3 Gaussians. per single-particle state 4 6 8 4 6 4 6 8 4 6 8 4 6 8

Selected Nuclei 4 He C 6 O ρ () (r) [ρ] Ne 8 Si 4 Ca spherical nuclei intrinsically deformed nuclei

Summary and Outlook Summary unitary correlation operator can describe short-range central and tensor correlations unitary correlator provides common low-momentum interaction correlated interaction can be used in many-body methods (HF, shell model, FMD) other observables can be correlated as well long range of tensor correlations has to be addressed M S = M S = Feldmeier, Neff, Roth, Schnack, NP A63 (998) 6 Neff, Feldmeier, NP A (accepted for publication), nucl-th/73 Outlook use correlated interaction with short-ranged tensor correlator in shell model calculations with configuration mixing use correlated interaction with long-ranged tensor correlator and three-body contributions (approximations) in simple manybody states (HF, FMD) genuine three-body forces are needed in addition for a successful description of nuclei