GEOMETRICAL AND OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINTS OF AN ACKERMANN STEERING LINKAGE

Similar documents
ON THE OPTIMIZATION OF AN ACKERMANN STEERING LINKAGE

Kinematic Synthesis of a Trailing Six-member Mechanism for Automotive Steering

IYGB. Special Paper U. Time: 3 hours 30 minutes. Created by T. Madas. Created by T. Madas

PLANAR RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION &

TAM 212 Worksheet 5: Car steering

PLANAR RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION

RIGID BODY MOTION (Section 16.1)

MTH 121 Fall 2007 Essex County College Division of Mathematics and Physics Worksheet #1 1

WEEK 1 Dynamics of Machinery

2001 Higher Maths Non-Calculator PAPER 1 ( Non-Calc. )

PURE MATHEMATICS AM 27

UNIT 2 KINEMATICS OF LINKAGE MECHANISMS

Practice Test - Chapter 4

Rearrange m ore complicated formulae where the subject may appear twice or as a power (A*) Rearrange a formula where the subject appears twice (A)

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3 Remark is a new function derived from called derivative. 2.2 The derivative as a Function

11.4 Dot Product Contemporary Calculus 1

Core A-level mathematics reproduced from the QCA s Subject criteria for Mathematics document

acting on a body has two effects:

Mathematics Extension 2

*P46958A0244* IAL PAPER JANUARY 2016 DO NOT WRITE IN THIS AREA DO NOT WRITE IN THIS AREA DO NOT WRITE IN THIS AREA. 1. f(x) = (3 2x) 4, x 3 2

Kinematic Analysis of a Pentapod Robot

Objectives List. Important Students should expect test questions that require a synthesis of these objectives.

SANDERSON HIGH SCHOOL AP CALCULUS AB/BC SUMMER REVIEW PACKET

GEOMETRY AND COMPLEX NUMBERS (January 23, 2004) 5

Math 121: Calculus 1 - Fall 2012/2013 Review of Precalculus Concepts

RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: VELOCITY (Section 16.5)

Candidates are expected to have available a calculator. Only division by (x + a) or (x a) will be required.

Pre-Calculus MATH 119 Fall Section 1.1. Section objectives. Section 1.3. Section objectives. Section A.10. Section objectives

CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE TRIGONOMETRY / PRE-CALCULUS

AN ORIGINAL METHOD OF PROVING THE FORMULA OF A TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTION OF A SUM OF ANGLES

DIFFERENTIATION RULES

Practice Test - Chapter 4

OPTIMAL DESIGN AND MULTIBODY ANALYSIS OF RZEPPA PILOT-LEVER JOINT

Robotics I. Figure 1: Initial placement of a rigid thin rod of length L in an absolute reference frame.

Transportation Engineering - II Dr. Rajat Rastogi Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Roorkee

2.2 The derivative as a Function

Math 121: Calculus 1 - Winter 2012/2013 Review of Precalculus Concepts

CLASS X FORMULAE MATHS

4 The Trigonometric Functions

Given an arc of length s on a circle of radius r, the radian measure of the central angle subtended by the arc is given by θ = s r :

Given an arc of length s on a circle of radius r, the radian measure of the central angle subtended by the arc is given by θ = s r :

1. Use the properties of exponents to simplify the following expression, writing your answer with only positive exponents.

A marks are for accuracy and are not given unless the relevant M mark has been given (M0 A1 is impossible!).

Hello Future Calculus Level One Student,

KINEMATIC STUDY OF FOLDING BRIDGE

Paper Reference. Core Mathematics C2 Advanced Subsidiary. Thursday 22 May 2014 Morning Time: 1 hour 30 minutes

crashmaths Schemes of Work New A Level Maths (2017)

Grade Math (HL) Curriculum

Math 121: Calculus 1 - Fall 2013/2014 Review of Precalculus Concepts

Determining a Triangle

Units. Year 1. Unit 1: Course Overview

What you will learn today

Calculus first semester exam information and practice problems

The degree of a function is the highest exponent in the expression

FUNCTIONS AND MODELS

DIFFERENTIATION RULES

Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced Subsidiary GCE in Mathematics (8MA0) Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Mathematics (9MA0)

IYGB. Special Paper C. Time: 3 hours 30 minutes. Created by T. Madas. Created by T. Madas

2. Force Systems. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Force

PURE MATHEMATICS AM 27

MATH 100 and MATH 180 Learning Objectives Session 2010W Term 1 (Sep Dec 2010)

Curriculum Area: Mathematics A Level - 2 year course (AQA) Year: 12. Aspire Learn Achieve

7.4 Off on a Tangent. A Develop and Solidify Understanding Task. tan(%) = Recall that the right triangle definition of the tangent ratio is:

Chapter P: Preliminaries

Core Mathematics C12

Study guide for Exam 1. by William H. Meeks III October 26, 2012

YEAR 13 - Mathematics Pure (C3) Term 1 plan

MATHEMATICS AP Calculus (BC) Standard: Number, Number Sense and Operations

West Windsor-Plainsboro Regional School District Algebra and Trigonometry Grades 11-12

SKILL BUILDER TEN. Graphs of Linear Equations with Two Variables. If x = 2 then y = = = 7 and (2, 7) is a solution.

Secondary School Certificate Examination Syllabus MATHEMATICS. Class X examination in 2011 and onwards. SSC Part-II (Class X)

CALCULUS BASIC SUMMER REVIEW

THE INVERSE TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTIONS

1 Sets of real numbers

Chapter 3 Differentiation Rules

YEAR 12 - Mathematics Pure (C1) Term 1 plan

MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT - I

Curriculum Map for Mathematics HL (DP1)

Mechanism Design. Transmission angle of mechanism

Unit #17: Spring Trig Unit. A. First Quadrant Notice how the x-values decrease by while the y-values increase by that same amount.

Algebra and functions; coordinate geometry in the (x, y) plane; sequences and series; differentiation; integration; vectors.

Possible C4 questions from past papers P1 P3

Name: Index Number: Class: CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL Preliminary Examination 3 Secondary 4

ME 6505 DYNAMICS OF MACHINES Fifth Semester Mechanical Engineering (Regulations 2013)

PROBLEM rad/s r. v = ft/s

Section 6.1 Sinusoidal Graphs

Angles and Applications

Core Mathematics C1 (AS) Unit C1

Summer Review Packet for Students Entering AP Calculus BC. Complex Fractions

Precalculus. Precalculus Higher Mathematics Courses 85

IB Mathematics HL Year 1 Unit 4: Trigonometry (Core Topic 3) Homework for Unit 4. (A) Using the diagram to the right show that

The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality

The singularities, forces transmission index and mechanism selfblocking

2012 Assessment Report. Mathematics with Calculus Level 3 Statistics and Modelling Level 3

Topics Covered in Calculus BC

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

PRECALCULUS BISHOP KELLY HIGH SCHOOL BOISE, IDAHO. Prepared by Kristina L. Gazdik. March 2005

Vector Algebra II: Scalar and Vector Products

AP CALCULUS AB Study Guide for Midterm Exam 2017

Higher Mathematics Skills Checklist

Transcription:

U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series D, Vol. 74, Iss., 0 ISSN 454-58 GEOMETRICAL AND OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINTS OF AN ACKERMANN STEERING LINKAGE Aurel P.STOICESCU In lucrare se analizează restricţiile geometrice şi funcţionale ale trapezului de direcţie al automobilelor, folosindu-se sistematic lungimile raportate ale elementelor acestuia. Se analizează în ce măsură funcţia de transmitere necesară a mecanismului poate fi realizată folosind la sinteza mecanismului metoda dezvoltării în serie Taylor a acestei funcţii. In the paper the geometrical and the operational constraints of an Ackermann steering linkage are analyzed by systematic using of the normalized lengths of the elements of the mechanism. One analyzes to what extent the necessary transmission function of the mechanism can be carried out when the synthesis of the mechanism is performed by method of the Taylor s series expansion. Keywords: automobile, Ackermann steering linkage, constraints, steering, steering angle, vehicle. Introduction The steering system of an automobile with the rigid steering axle (beam and steering knuckles hinge-connected to the beam with king pins) comprises the steering mechanism which is represented by the steering trapezium otherwise known as Ackermann steering linkage. For the kinematical synthesis of an Ackermann steering linkage analytical and graphical methods are used. In the beginning of the automobile development graphical methods have been employed. For the facility of design, on the basis of these methods, tables and diagrams have been achieved as those by Lutz []. The analysis and synthesis of the Ackermann linkage have been tackled in numerous papers. A comprehensive list of these works together with the essential ideas and their concise conclusions written before 977 are presented in monograph []. In [] the conditions in which the graphs of the transmission function of the Ackermann steering linkage and the theoretical transmission function corresponding to the correct steering condition have the same curvature at origin has been investigated in connection with the synthesis of this Prof., Motor Vehicle Dept., University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, ROMANIA, e-mail: a.p.stoicescu@gmail.com

4 Aurel P. Stoicescu mechanism. The approximated synthesis of an Ackermann steering linkage using Taylor s expansion has been tackled in [] and again in [4]. In the present paper the geometrical and operational constraints of an Ackermann steering linkage are minutely investigated using systematically normalized lengths of its elements. In connection with this fact one analyzes to what extent the transmission function of the Ackermann steering linkage may be approximated by the method of Taylor s series expansion in view of the synthesis of this mechanism. In the paper we consider the planar Ackermann steering linkage and the classical condition of correct steering of a vehicle given by the Ackermann s relation [, 5]. In the most works, the mentioned relation is referred to as Ackermann s relation, but, curiously, in [] it does not have a denomination.. Elements of geometry and kinematics of the Ackermann linkage In the sketch of a four-bar mechanism shown in Fig. the points A and D are fixed on the motor vehicle. Fig. Geometrical elements of a four-bar mechanism They represent the intersections of the king pin axes with the mechanism plane, this being parallel to the ground (the king pin axes are perpendicular to the ground plane). The elements and are the steering knuckle arms, and element is the tie-rod. For the present condition it is adequately to define the positioning elements of the four-bar mechanism in the way shown in Fig.. The lengths of the elements, and are l, l and l, respectively. The distance between A and D is l 4 : it represents the king pin track denoted by E p also. From triangle ABD we can write the relations χ μ l l4 tg cot = g, χ + μ = π, () l + l4 from which it follows that π l l4 cot χ = + arctg. g 4 () l + l

Geometrical and operational constraints of an Ackermann steering linkage 5 Applying the cosine theorem in triangles BAD and DBC one can determine the angle τ. In asimilar way from triangles BAD and DBC one can calculate the angle σ. Further, one can determine the angles ϕ and ϕ using the relations = τ χ, = σ + χ. () Putting the normalized lengths λ = l / l4, λ = l / l4, λ = l / l4, (4) taking into account that in the case of the steering trapezium λ =λ, after performing above described operations we obtain λ cos ( ) arccos λ λ cot π = arctg g, λ cos λ (5) + λ λ + λ cos ( ) arccos λ λ λ cot π = + arctg g. + λ cos λ (6) + λ λ + By projecting of the contour ABCD on the direction of AD after that on a perpendicular direction on same direction one arrives the relationship: λ cos + λ cos + λ cos =, (7) λ sin + λ sin λ sin = 0. (8) If the relations (7) and (8) are differentiated with respect to ϕ, then one obtains a linear system of two equations with two unknowns (the transmission ratios) i = d / d, i = d / d. Solving this system and performing some trigonometrically transformations one arrives at the relations λ sin( + ) sin( ), i = i =. λ sin( + ) sin( + ) (9). Geometrical and operational constraints for the Ackermann linkage As is known, the Ackermann linkage may be situated either before or at back of the front axle. Corresponding to the two cases one uses the following denominations: leading Ackermann linkage and trailing Ackermann linkage... Trailing Ackermann steering linkage Schematically, the disposal of the trailing Ackermann steering linkage is indicated in Fig..

6 Aurel P. Stoicescu Fig.. Trailing Ackermann steering linkage-geometrical elements Supposing that the turning is negotiated to the left ( v -motor vehicle velocity), the outer wheel is turned by angle β e and the inner wheel is turned by angle β i. Inspecting the Fig. one can write the relations: βe = 0, βi = 0, (0) where ϕ 0 =ϕ 0 represent the values of ϕ and ϕ when the motor vehicle is in a straight motion. Elementary geometrical considerations yield cos0 = cos0 = ( λ ) /(λ ). () In the case of the trailing Ackermann linkage l l 4 =E p, so that λ. The existence condition of the Ackermann linkage is 0 λ λ, ( λ 0). () Applying the Grashof s theorem or the variant expounded in [4] one readily establishes that the trailing Ackermann linkage is double-rocker. For a large turning angle of the outer wheel the Ackermann linkage may arrive in critical position when the points B, C and D lie in a straight line. In this situation the angle ϕ has the value ϕ l. Applying law cosines for the triangle formed at mentioned position we obtain λ ( ) cos λ + λ l =. () λ Obviously, the following inequalities must be satisfied λ λ ( λ + λ ) λ,( λ > 0). (4) The right inequality of (4) becomes after transformations ( λ + )(λ + λ ) 0. Because λ +>0, it results that λ +λ - 0, which coincides with the right inequality of (). The left inequality of (4) can be written as ( λ )(λ + λ + ) 0. Because λ - 0, one deduces that λ +λ +>0, which is allways satisfied. Therefore, if the existence conditions () for the Ackermann linkage are satisfied then the inequalities (4) are satisfied.

Geometrical and operational constraints of an Ackermann steering linkage 7 Obviously, it is necessary that allways ϕ ϕ l. Taking into account (0), it follows that l 0 βe max, (5) where β emax represents the maximum required turning angle of the outer wheel (its value corresponds to the minimum turning radius). Taking into account () and (), the relation (5) becomes λ ( ) arccos λ + λ λ arccos β e max. (6) λ λ Obviously it is necessary that λ ( λ + λ ) λ <, λ λ which, after transformations, becomes λ (λ +λ -)>0 λ +λ ->0. The preceding inequality coincides with the inequality associated with the existence condition of the Ackermann linkage (without the equal sign because otherwise it would mean that β emax =0). For the bar mechanisms the motion transmitting can be readily achieved if the pressure angle does not exceed certain admissible value [4]. The transmission angle, which is complement of the pressure angle, can not be smaller than 0-0 in the case of an Ackermann linkage []. One can prove that the transmission angle between the element and the element is given as γ = +. (7) If γ a is the admissible value of the transmission angle and if we take into account (5), (6), the first relation in (0) and the relation (7) then the condition of the motion transmitting is written as λ λ cos( βemax + 0) λ λ λ cos( βemax + 0) arccos + arccos λ λ λ cos( βemax + 0) λ λ λ cos( βemax + 0) γa (8) The expression under root sign in (8) is allways positive. Indeed, from evident inequality λ >λ it follows that λ >λ cos(β emax +ϕ 0 ) since - <cos(β emax +ϕ 0 )<. The numerators of the fractions from (8) are allways positive. Indeed, from evident inequality cos(β emax +ϕ 0 )<cosϕ 0 =(-λ )/(λ ) it follows that : λ -λ cos(β emax +ϕ 0 )>λ +λ >0, λ -λ -λ cos(β emax +ϕ 0 )> λ +λ (-λ )>0, (λ ).

8 Aurel P. Stoicescu Fig.. The graphical representation of the conditions (), (6) and (8) for the trailing Ackermann steering linkage : β emax =5, γ a =5 For a given value of β emax, the condition (8) is satisfied when λ and λ are chosen so that the condition (6) without the equal sign is fulfilld. We can prove that in this conditions the arguments of the functions arccos from (6) are less than (we readily verify that if in (6) the case of equality is considered the mentioned arguments are equal to ). For given values of β emax and γ a, the conditions (), (6) and (8) are dependent on the normalized lengths λ and λ. On the plotting plane (λ,λ ) with λ >0, λ >0, the above mentioned conditions define the domains D t, D t and D t, respectively. Of course, the domain D t has boundary defined by a straight line. Using a proper program in Mathematica, the boundaries of the domains D t and D t have been constructed. They are shown in Fig.. The boundaries are depicted by B t, B t and B t, respectively. It is found that D t D t D t. One can prove that the boundary of the domain defined in the first quadrant of the coordinate system has a horizontal asymptote given by the equation λ = sin βe max. Therefore, the normalized lengths of the trailing Ackermann linkage should theoretically fulfil the conditions: λ [ λ ε, ), λ [sinβ emax, ], where λ ε is a positive number however small but finite. Also, one can prove that the boundary of the domain defined by (8) in the first quadrant of the coordinate system has a horizontal asymptote given by equation λ =sinβ emax /cosγ a, so that λ [λ ε, ), λ [sinβ emax /cosγ a, ]. Of course, the values of λ and λ should be chosen according to design constraints... Leading Ackermann steering linkage Inspecting the Fig. 4 one can write βe = 0, βi = 0. (9)

Geometrical and operational constraints of an Ackermann steering linkage 9 Fig. 4. Leading Ackermann steering linkage : geometrical elements In this case λ > and the existence condition of the trapezium is λ λ,( λ 0, λ ) (0) In time, the Ackermann linkage is a double crank mechanism. In critical position the points B, C and D are collinear (the point C lies on the right side of the point D). Alike as in the preceding case the expression of the limit angle is obtained as: λ ( ) cos λ λ l =. () λ Taking into account the first relation (9) we obtain λ ( ) arccos + λ arccos λ λ β e max. () λ λ One can prove that the transmission angle is given by relation γ = π ( + ). () In view of the preceding relation the condition of motion transmitting is written as λ λ cos( 0 βemax) λ λ λ cos( 0 βemax) arccos + arccos λ λ λ cos( 0 βemax) λ λ λ cos( 0 βemax) π γa (4) As in the case of the trailing Ackermann linkage the imposed requirements on the parameters λ and λ relating to the relations () and () are associated with the existence condition of the trapezium (the proofs is similar). In the same way one can verify that the expression under sign roots in (4) is positive. To be fulfilled the inequality (4), λ and λ should satisfy the strict inequality (). One can prove that the moduli of the arguments of the functions arcos in (4) are less. If one considers the equal sign in () then the mentioned arguments are and - (the order may be inverse). Following the same considerations as in the case of the trailing Ackermann linkage, the graphs shown in Fig.5 are obtained. At the same time, there are the domains D l, D l and D l. Also, the boundaries of these domains are

0 Aurel P. Stoicescu depicted by B l, B l and B l, respectively. We can prove that the boundary of the domain defined by () considering that the region marked by λ has an oblique asymptote given by the equation λ = λ + cos βe max. Also, the boundary defined by (4) has an oblique asymptote of which slope m satisfies the equation arccos(0.5m) + arccos( 0.5m ) = π γ a. It is found that λ should be less than a certain specified value for a given λ. This condition is opposite to that of the trailing Ackermann linkage. Fig. 5. The graphical representation of the conditions (0), () and (4) for the trailing Ackermann steering linkage : β emax =5, γ a =5 4. Analysis of the capability of an Ackermann steering linkage to carry out the condition of correct steering The condition of correct steering is written as [, 5]: cot gβe cot gβi = E p / L, (5) where L is the wheel base of the automobile. If it is supposed that β e is the input quantity and β I is output quantity then the relation (5) leads to the relation tgβe β i = arctg. (6) ( E p / L) tgβe Taylor s series expansion around the origin of the second part of the relation (6) yields (obviously, β e =0 β i =0)

Geometrical and operational constraints of an Ackermann steering linkage 4 βi = βe + ( E p / L). βe + ( E p / L). βe + [ ( E p / L) / + ( E p / L) ]. βe + [ ( E p / L) 4 5 5 6 7 + ( E p / L) ]. βe + [( E p / L)( / 45) ( E p / L) + ( E p / L) ]. βe + O[ βe ]. (7) If β it is the value of β I determined by (6) and β in is the value of the same angle determined by relation (7) when n terms are retained (n=,, 4, 5, 6), then the error committed by the relation (7) is defined so βin βit e t = 00 [%]. (8) βit Fig. 6. The influence of the term number of Taylor s series on the error From the inspection of the numerical results highlighted by Fig.6 it is found that the approximation with two terms is better than that with and 4 terms for range angles greater than 0-5 ( obviously, this angle is dependent on the ratio E p /L). The retaining of 6 terms provides a high accuracy for the large values of the angle. The series expansion of the function ϕ (ϕ ) is (obviously, ϕ 0 =ϕ 0 ): d d d ( ) = 0 + ( 0 ) + ( 0 ) + ( 0 ) +! d!! 0 d0 d0 4 O[( 0 ) ]. (9) The first derivative of the function ϕ is given by relation (9). Taking into account that ϕ 0 ϕ 0 =0, from (9) it results d d sin 0, λ = =. (0) d0 d0 λ sin 0 Using the expression of the first derivative we get

Aurel P. Stoicescu d d sin( ) [ d = ] = [cos( )( ) sin( + ) sin( ) d d + sin ( + ) d d cos( )sin( )( d + + )] () d d In considerations on (0), after a succession of transformations, we arrive at the relation d cos0 λ = ( cos0 + ). () d sin 0 0 λ In view of () the preceding relation becomes d λ =. () d 0 λ 4λ + λ λ In a similar way one proceeds for the third order derivative and the result is written as d 4 λ 4 cos λ 0 λ cos cos = + + 0 + 0 +, (4) λ d λ λ λ λ λ sin 0 Finally, in consideration on () we get d 4( λ )( λ + λ ) =. (5) d0 λ [ 4λ + ( λ ) ] Substituting ϕ (ϕ ) given by (9) into the second relation (0) and taking into account the first relation (0), and (0), (), (), we arrive at the expression λ ( + λ )( λ + λ 4 β itt = βe + βe. β [ ], 4 e + O βe (6) λ λ[ 4λ ( λ) ] λ + λ + λ + + where β itt is the angle achieved by the trailing Ackermann linkage for the inner wheel. Comparing the relations (7) and (6) it is found that the linear terms are the same. Therefore, the Ackermann linkage provides the condition of correct steering to the squared terms (exclusively) of the turning angle β e regardless the design characteristics. There is the ideal case when the expansions (7) and (6) would be identical, which is impossible because only two independent parameters are available (λ and λ ). Therefore we may set the condition that the terms of β e and β e be identical, namely :

Geometrical and operational constraints of an Ackermann steering linkage λ λ = 4λ + λ + λ E p ( λ )( λ + λ E p, =. (7) L λ [ 4λ + ( λ ) ] L From system (7), λ and λ might be determined, but, generally, this system has no real positive solutions. To illustrate this, in Fig. the curves corresponding to the two equations (7) are also shown. It is found that the curves do not intersect into the domain which is of practical interest. Moreover, the curve for degree term which is located within the domain does not yield β e 5. The condition for the two degree term can be fulfilled but it does not assure the condition of the motion transmitting. In the case of the leading Ackermann linkage the relations (7)-(5) remain valid. In consideration of (9) we get finally the expression λ ( + λ)( + λ + λ 4 β itl = βe βe. β [ ], (8) 4 e + O βe λ λ[ 4λ ( λ ) ] λ + λ + λ + + where β ilt is the angle achieved by the leading Ackermann steering linkage for the inner wheel. So we arrive at a system similar to () and the representation of the associated curves is shown in Fig. 5. And in this case the system does not have real positive solutions. The curve for two degree term is enough near to the limit curve for the motion transmitting. The curve corresponding to the degree term is located into the admissible domain. From the above results it follows that the graph of the transmission function of the Ackermann steering linkage has at origin the same tangent as the graph of the theoretical transmission function corresponding to the correct steering condition. In [] the conditions in which the two mentioned graphs have the same curvature at origin has been investigated. The determination of the second derivative of the transmission function has been carried out by the acceleration method, which is more intricate than that presented here. The obtained result has a form which differs from that given in this paper, but one can prove that the proper result is not different (one can directly prove starting from ()). The above mentioned method cannot be applied for determination of the third derivative, what explain probably the reason for which the question has not been tackled. The applied method for the approximate synthesis in [, 4] is different than that used in the present paper. In the implicit expression of the transmission function the angle β e is substituted for the terms to third degree term of β I from the Taylor s series expansion, after that a succession of approximations are made. Further, l and λ being chosen one determines ϕ 0. For example [4], for

4 Aurel P. Stoicescu E p /L=0.40 and λ =0.0 the result is λ =0.80. This result leads to β emax =, which is enough small. Considering different values of E p /L we can conclude that, generally, the approximate synthesis of the Ackermann linkage by the series expansion method cannot carried out only to at the most the square outer turning angle. 5. Conclusions The relations established in the paper allow defining the admissible domains of the normalized lengths of the Ackermann steering linkage elements corresponding to the critical position of the mechanism and the admissible transmission angle. These domains are not dependent on the automobile characteristics. The mentioned relations render evident the fact that the constraints of the Ackermann steering linkage are hard enough. Also, these relations can be straightway used to optimize the Ackermann steering linkage, which we shall do in a next paper. The synthesis of the Ackermann linkage using Taylor s series expansion has an important limitation because only the linear terms of the transmission function expansion can be exactly reproduced by the mechanism. R E F E R E N C E S [].A. Heller, Motorwagen und Fahrzeugmaschinen für flüssigen Brennstoff, Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin 9, Reprint Steiger Verlag, Moers, 985 [] P. Alexandru, Fl. Dudiţă, A. Jula, V. Benche (Coordonator Fl. Dudiţă), Mecanismele direcţiei autovehiculelor (Steering gears of power driven crafts), Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 977 [] D. Forkel, Ein Beitrag zur Auslegung von Fahrzeuglenkungen, Deutsche Kraftfahrtforschung und Strassenverkehrstechnik, Heft 45, 96 [4] Fl. Dudiţă, D. Diaconescu, Gr. Gogu, Mecanisme articulate-inventica şi cinematica în abordare filogenetică (Linkages. Inventics and Kinematics), Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 989 [5] A. P. Stoicescu Dinamica autovehiculelor (Dynamics of Road Vehicles), vol. III, Institutul Politehnic Bucureşti, 986