Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack

Similar documents
CATALOG OF EARTHQUAKES IN DELAWARE

THE LAMONT COOPERATIVE SEISMIC NETWORK AND THE NATIONAL SEISMIC SYSTEM: EARTHQUAKE HAZARD STUDIES IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES.

THE LAMONT COOPERATIVE SEISMIC NETWORK AND THE ADVANCED NATIONAL SEISMIC SYSTEM: EARTHQUAKE HAZARD STUDIES IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES.

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

High-precision location of North Korea s 2009 nuclear test

Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

Seismic Recording Station AZ_PFO Summary Report

Seismicity in Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Seismic Network (PASEIS)

Seismicity in Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Seismic Network (PASEIS)

ATTENUATION OF LG WAVES IN THE EASTERN TIBETAN PLATEAU. Jiakang Xie. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Seismic Recording Station TA_109C Summary Report

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA

THE LAMONT COOPERATIVE SEISMIC NETWORK AND THE NATIONAL SEISMIC SYSTEM: EARTHQUAKE HAZARD STUDIES IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES.

Underlying Reasons for the Wide Range of Yield Estimates for the Underground Nuclear Explosion of September 3, 2017, in North Korea

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

Location of the M 2.0 Earthquake on 08/22/2010 that Occurred 25 km North of West Valley, New York.

revised October 30, 2001 Carlos Mendoza

Absolute strain determination from a calibrated seismic field experiment

EVALUATION**OF**A**SEISMIC* EVENT,*12*MAY*2010,*IN* NORTH&KOREA. Paul%G.%Richards,%Lamont5Doherty%Earth%Observatory,%Columbia%University

EXCITATION AND PROPAGATION OF SHORT-PERIOD SURFACE WAVES IN YOUNG SEAFLOOR. Donald W. Forsyth. Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University

Performance of the GSN station KONO-IU,

LAB 6 SUPPLEMENT. G141 Earthquakes & Volcanoes

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF NORTHEAST ASIA

STUDY OF BROADBAND Lg/P AND ITS APPLICATION TO SOURCE DISCRIMINATION

CRUSTAL STRUCTURE AND SURFACE-WAVE DISPERSION. PART II SOLOMON ISLANDS EARTHQUAKE OF JULY 29, 1950* By MAURICE EWING and FRANK PRESS

DR

EVALUATION OF CROSS-CORRELATION METHODS ON A MASSIVE SCALE FOR ACCURATE RELOCATION OF SEISMIC EVENTS

P Wave Reflection and Refraction and SH Wave Refraction Data Processing in the Mooring, TN Area

TWO SLOW SURFACE WAVES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA* By FRANK PRESS and MAURICE EWING

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Measurements of Seismometer Orientation at USArray Transportable Array and Backbone Stations

Regional Wave Propagation in New England and New York

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

FOCAL MECHANISM DETERMINATION OF LOCAL EARTHQUAKES IN MALAY PENINSULA

Speed of Aircraft. Eduardo Kausel Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Abstract

APPLICATION OF RECEIVER FUNCTION TECHNIQUE TO WESTERN TURKEY

A BROADBAND SEISMIC EXPERIMENT IN YUNNAN, SOUTHWEST CHINA. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Contract No.

) of the earth's core for body waves from the Marshall Islands region

Magnitude determinations

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

DETECTION OF NATURALLY OCCURRING EVENTS FROM SMALL APERTURE INFRASOUND ARRAYS

Probing Mid-Mantle Heterogeneity Using PKP Coda Waves

by Pentti Varpasuo* Fortum Nuclear Services Ltd Rajatorpantie 8, Vantaa, Fortum

Page 1. Name:

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Seismicity in Pennsylvania from February 2013 to June 2015

2009 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Review of April 2016 Lawrence County Seismic Events

Scattering and intrinsic attenuation structure in Central Anatolia, Turkey using BRTR (PS-43) array

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

the IRIS Consortium Collaborative, Multi-user Facilities for Research and Education Briefing NSF Business Systems Review September 9, 2008

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

PHASE TIME INVERSION: A SIMPLE METHOD FOR REGIONAL WAVEFORM INVERSION. Charles A. Langston. University of Memphis

Seismological Study of Earthquake Swarms in South-Eastern Puerto Rico

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Magnitude determinations

Earthquake Lab Introduction: Purpose: Method: Equipment needed: Fundamental Concepts and Key Terms:

Earthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network , preliminary results

Contract No. F

SOURCE AND PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPLOSIVE AND OTHER SEISMIC SOURCES

Magnitude 8.3 SEA OF OKHOTSK

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Long-period ground motion characterization by cross wavelet transform

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Finding out what earthquakes have happened recently Subscribe to an alert system

SOURCE PROCESS OF THE 2003 PUERTO PLATA EARTHQUAKE USING TELESEISMIC DATA AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

RISKY HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS RESONATING WITH THE LONG-PERIOD STRONG GROUND MOTIONS IN THE OSAKA BASIN, JAPAN

Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of a Portion of East End Cemetery, Cadiz, Kentucky

Finite difference elastic modeling of the topography and the weathering layer

S e i s m i c W a v e s

Seismic and Tsunami Observations of Indonesia

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies SEISMICITY OF CENTRAL ASIA AS OBSERVED ON THREE IMS STATIONS

The 2003, M W 7.2 Fiordland Earthquake, and its nearsource aftershock strong motion data

Analysis Of Earthquake Records of Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response System Stations Related to the Determination of Site Fundamental Frequency

South Carolina Seismic Network Bulletin

EXCITATION AND ATTENUATION OF REGIONAL WAVES, AND MAGNITUDE DEPENDENCE OF PN/LG RATIOS IN EASTERN EURASIA

Northern Tanzanian Earthquakes: Fault orientations, and depth distribution

Estimation of Regional Seismic Hazard in the Korean Peninsula Using Historical Earthquake Data between A.D. 2 and 1995

in Seismic Monitoring

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

By D.H. Lang 1 and J. Schwarz 1. This paper is an extract from

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies MODELING P WAVE MULTIPATHING IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

The EarthScope Geophysical Observatories. Slides courtesy Bob Woodward, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS)

Microearthquake Focal Mechanisms

Detecting and Identifying Seismic Events Using the Egyptian National Seismic Network

5. What is an earthquake 6. Indicate the approximate radius of the earth, inner core, and outer core.

C) 10:20:40 A) the difference between the arrival times of the P -wave and the S -wave

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies IMPROVED DEPTH-PHASE DETECTION AT REGIONAL DISTANCES

Contemporary Tectonics and Seismicity of the Teton and Southern Yellowstone Fault Systems- Phase I

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C

Regional Seismic Travel Time (RSTT) Modeling Technique. Science & Technology Conference, June Presented By Stephen C. Myers

5. EARTHQUAKES AND EARTH S INTERIOR

Tomographic imaging of P wave velocity structure beneath the region around Beijing

URBAN SEISMIC GROUND MOTION: A COUPLED EFFECT OF SITE AND URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Transcription:

Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack Won-Young Kim Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, N. Y. 10964, USA and Gerald R. Baum Environmental Geology and Mineral Resources Program, Maryland Geological Survey 2300 St. Paul Street Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Summary Since the time of plane impact at the Pentagon had often been reported with large scatter, the United States Army contacted us to inquire whether we could obtain an accurate time of the Pentagon attack on September 11, 2001 based upon our seismic network. We analyzed seismic records from five stations in the northeastern United States, ranging from 63 to 350 km from the Pentagon. Despite detailed analysis of the data, we could not find a clear seismic signal. Even the closest station ( = 62.8 km) at Soldier s Delight, Baltimore County, Maryland (SDMD) did not record the impact. We concluded that the plane impact to the Pentagon generated relatively weak seismic signals. However, we positively identified seismic signals associated with United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed near Shanksville, Somerset County, Pennsylvania. The time of the plane crash was 10:06:05±5 (EDT). Introduction Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center (WTC) towers, scientists at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University were able to determine accurate times of the plane impacts and building collapses using the seismic signals recorded at numerous seismographic stations in the Northeastern United States. The collapse of the WTC towers generated large seismic waves observed in five states and up to 428 km away. The North Tower collapse was the larger seismic source and had a magnitude M L 2.3 (Kim et al., 2001). The time of plane impact at the Pentagon was reported with large scatter. For instance, Cable News Network (CNN) reported 09:43 (EDT), the Washington Post reported 09:40 (EDT), and the New York Times reported 09:38 (EDT). If the plane impact to the Pentagon generated strong enough ground motion that could be propagated through the Earth s crust as elastic waves (seismic waves) and recorded at sensitive seismographic stations around the source, we could determine absolute time of the impact by using the arrival times of P, S or surface seismic waves. The accuracy of the measured time would depend upon the clarity and strength of the seismic wave arrivals and our knowledge of crustal structure between the source and seismographic stations. This method can provide accurate and absolute time of a seismic event, since most of the modern seismographic stations are equipped with GPS 1

(Global Positioning System) satellite receivers that can provide absolute time usually within one thousandth of a second accuracy. In case of the WTC attack, the impacts of the two planes could be determined with an accuracy of about ±2 seconds. Although the impact times are inferred from oscillatory surface wave arrivals, the nearest station, PAL (Palisades, NY), was only about 34 km away from the WTC. Analysis of Seismic Records for Pentagon Attack It was reported by the New York Times (B9, 10/06/2001) that at 09:36 (EDT) the crew of a military C-130 plane identified a Boeing 767 moving low and very fast, and that the plane crashed into the southwest side of the Pentagon at 09:38 (EDT). We collected seismic records from all available seismographic stations in the Northeastern United States around the Pentagon (Table 1; Figure 1) in the hope of verifying or accurately pinpointing the time of impact. The nearest station to the Pentagon is SDMD (Soldier s Delight) in Baltimore County, Maryland ( = 62.8 km) that has been operational since the late summer of 2001. The station was installed and is operated by the Maryland Geological Survey. It is part of the Lamont-Doherty Cooperative Seismographic Network (LCSN) that monitors earthquakes in the Northeast. The second closest station to the Pentagon is CBN (Corbin, Virginia, = 78.9 km). However, this station did not produce useful waveform data for the time window, because this seismographic station records data only when seismic signals are detected. Figure 2 shows seismic records at the three nearest stations around the Pentagon with distance ranges from 63 to 208 km. Three minutes of vertical-component seismic records from 09:36:30 (EDT) to 09:39:30 (EDT) are plotted. There appears to be strong seismic signals around 09:38:52 at station MVL (Millersville, Pa; = 139 km), but the signals are too high frequency (5-10 Hz) and too high amplitude (328 nm/s at 139 km). Hence, it appears be noise perhaps due to electrical disturbances. Otherwise, there are no clear and consistent seismic wave arrivals in this time window. Figure 3 shows seismic record section for records shown in Figure 2. These displays facilitate analysis of seismic signals by displaying a suite of records in order by distance. Hence, the seismic phase Pg (P waves propagating through Earth s crust) would propagate with nearly constant speed of about 6 km/s over the record section, where as the phase Pn (critically refracted P waves propagating through top of the uppermost mantle) propagates with an apparent speed of about 8 km/s. Hence, the consistency of seismic phases across a seismograph network is the key to discern if there are any seismic signals generated during the plane impact into the Pentagon. These waveform data indicate that we could not identify seismic signals associated with the plane impact into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. In case of the plane impacts to the WTC towers, the observed peak amplitudes on the verticalcomponent record at PAL (Palisades, NY; = 34 km) are 230 and 260 nanometers/sec for the first (North Tower) and the second (South Tower) impacts, respectively. A nanometer is 10 9 meters. Figure 4 shows seismic record section of vertical seismic records from the WTC South Tower 2

collapse at 11:59:39 (EDT) (13:59:04 UTC). It generated strong seismic waves equivalent to an earthquake of local magnitude M L =2.1 (Richter scale; see Kim, 1998). The seismic signals, Lg and Rg waves, are discernible up to about 500 km from the WTC site. Stations MVL, SDMD and SSPA that we examined for the Pentagon case, also recorded useful signals and indicate that these stations were working normally on September 11, 2001. Analysis of Seismic Records for United Airlines Flight 93 Crash near Shanksville, Pa Figure 5 shows seismic record section of vertical-component records from four stations around the United Airlines Flight 93 crash site near Shanksville, Somerset County, Pennsylvania. The location of the site is taken from the web site for the Flight 93 Memorial, URL http://www.shanksvillememorial.com. The four closest stations range in distance from 92 to 218 km (Table 1). Two minutes of vertical-component seismic records starting from estimated origin time of 14:06:05 (10:06:05 EDT) are plotted. The seismic signals are relatively weak compared with the background noise level. For instance, at stations MCWV and SDMD, the signal (portion of signals just after Sg) to noise (portion of records just before Pg arrivals) ratios are about 1:1, whereas, at station SSPA the ratio is about 2.5:1 and at MVL it is about 2:1 (Figure 5). Although, seismic signals across the network are not as strong and clear as the WTC case (see Kim et al., 2001), three component records at station SSPA ( = 107.6 km) shown in Figure 6 are quite clear. The three-component records at SSPA are dominated by strong Lg arrivals, whereas the Pg waves are difficult to discern and have amplitudes comparable to the noise level. This is typical for seismic waves generated by airplane impacts and crashes. The seismic signals marked as Sg in Figure 5 propagated from the Shanksville crash site to the stations with approximately 3.5 km/s. Hence, we infer that the Flight 93 crashed around 14:06:05±5 (UTC) (10:06:05 EDT). The uncertainty is only due to seismic velocity at the uppermost crust near the surface in which the Lg waves propagated. Acknowledgments We thank the many individuals and institutions that collaborated with us in operating the seismographic stations in the Northeastern United States. In particular, Richard Ortt and Robert Conkwright at the Environmental Geology and Mineral Resources, Maryland Geological Survey installed and operate the station SDMD (Soldier s Delight, Maryland) and provided the digital waveform data for the analysis. Professor Charles Scharnberger at the Millersville University, Pennsylvania operates the station MVL (Millersville, Pennsylvania) and provided the data. These modern broadband, digital seismographic stations form the backbone of the Lamont-Doherty Cooperative Seismographic Network (LCSN). We appreciate LCSN staff Jeremiah Armitage, John Armbruster and John Contino at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory for their efforts. Dr. Martin Chapman at Virginia Tech provided the waveform data from BLA (Blacksburg, Virginia). The analysis carried out for this report is sponsored by the Department of Natural Resources, State of Maryland under contract number SMGS/AG1-01-075. 3

References Kim, Won-Young, The M L scale in eastern North America, Bulletine of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 935-951, 1998. Kim, Won-Young, L. R. Sykes, J. H. Armitage, J. K. Xie, K. H. Jacob, P. G. Richards, M. West, F. Waldhauser, J. Armbruster, L. Seeber, W. X. Du and A. Lerner-Lam, Seismic waves generated by aircraft impacts and building collapses at World Trade Center, New York City, Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 82, No. 47, pages 565, 570-571, November 20, 2001. 4

Table 1: Seismographic Stations in the Northeastern United States Seismographic stations Pentagon (1) Shanksville, Pa (2) Station Station Lat. Long. Distance Az Distance Az code name ( N) ( W) (km) ( ) (km) ( ) SDMD Solder s Delight, Md 39.410 76.840 62.8 17.4 190.6 111.4 CBN Corbin, Va 38.205 77.373 78.9 200.5 244.3 146.8 MVL Millersville, Pa 39.999 76.351 139.3 25.7 217.8 90.8 SSPA Standing Stone, Pa 40.636 77.888 208.5 340.3 107.6 52.8 MCWV Mont Chateau, WVa 39.658 79.846 255.9 290.8 92.1 241.7 BLA Blacksburg, Va 37.211 80.421 347.9 239.1 342.3 203.2 (1) Epicentral distance and azimuth between the Pentagon (approximately at 38.871 N, 77.058 W), and stations; (2) Epicentral distance and azimuth between the UA Flight 93 crash site (40.055 N, 78.901 W) and the stations. 5

Seismic Observations on September 11, 2001 43 N GENY CONY BINY 42 N LSCT 41 N Pittsburgh SSPA LUPA BRNJ WTC PAL New York 40 N MCWV Shanksville SDMD MVL Philadelphia Baltimore 39 N Pentagon miles 0 50 100 38 N CBN LCSN Broadband LCSN Short-period USNSN Stations BLA VTSO Short-period 37 N 81 W 80 W 79 W 78 W 77 W 76 W 75 W 74 W 73 W 72 W Figure 1: Seismographic stations and topography for Northeastern United States. Impacts and crashes of aircrafts during the terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2001 are indicated by solid stars. Solid triangles and squares indicate stations that recorded seismic signals from WTC, Pentagon and Shanksville, Pa, whereas the open triangles and squares indicate stations either closed or recorded no data. Waveform data used for the analysis are indicated by source-receiver path. 6

Vertical-Component Seismic Records Covering Time Window of Plane Impact at Pentagon on September 11, 2001, 09:36:30 to 09:39:30 (EDT), 0.6-5 Hz 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 SDMD BHZ 200 nm/s 2001/09/11 13:36:30.00 62.7 km az= 17.4 baz=197.5 09:37 09:38 09:39 EDT MVL BHZ 328 nm/s 2001/09/11 13:36:29.98 139.3 km az= 25.7 baz=206.2 SSPA BHZ 43 nm/s 2001/09/11 13:36:30.00 208.5 km az=340.3 baz=159.8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 time (sec) Figure 2: Vertical-component seismic records at three stations around Pentagon. Three minutes of continuous data shown starting at 09:36:30 EDT (13:36:30 UTC). Data were sampled at 40 times/s and passband filtered from 0.6 to 5 Hz. The maximum amplitudes of traces ranges from 200 nanometer/seconds (nm/s) at SDMD ( =63 km) to 43 nm/s at SSPA ( =208 km) The largest signal at MVL at around 09:38:50 is probablly generated by electrical disturbance. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) is UTC minus 4 hours. 7

Vertical Seismic Records for Possible Pentagon Plane Impact on Sept. 11, 2001 09/11/2001, 13:38:09 (UTC), 38.871 N, 77.058 W, Depth= 0 km T i m e (sec) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 50 SDMD 17 144 nm/s Pg Sg D i s t a n c e (km) 100 150 noise signal MVL 26 328 nm/s 200 SSPA 340 43 nm/s 250 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Figure 3: Vertical-component records from three stations in Fig. 2. Possible seismic signals from the airplane crash into the Pentagon may be very weak, but examination of seismic data recorded across network of three stations would help identify the signals. Predeicted P- and S-wave arrivals across the network are indicated by dotted lines for a presumed origin time of 13:38:09 EDT. There is no clear seismic signals which can be associated with the airplane crash into the Pentagon. 8

Vertical Records from WTC South Tower Collapse on September 11, 2001 09/11/2001, 13:59:04 (UTC), 40.711 N, 74.013 W, ML=2.1, (0.6-5 Hz) T i m e (sec) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 50 PAL 15 2002 nm/s BRNJ 266 TBR 340 4147 nm/s MANY 12 ARNY 353 100 Pg Sg local explosion YLE 54 LSCT 31 681 nm/s 150 Rg 200 D i s t a n c e (km) 250 300 MVL 249 368 nm/s BINY 316 241 nm/s SDMD 240 190 nm/s 350 SSPA 270 146 nm/s NCB 357 113 nm/s 400 450 LBNH 23 69 nm/s 500 MCWV 259 241 nm/s 550 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Figure 4: Vertical component record section from WTC South Tower collapse. S wave arrivals with 3.5 km/s are indicated by solid line, which is usually the beginning of Lg waves. 9

Vertical Seismic Records for United Flight 93 Crash near Shanksville, Pa. Event time: 09/11/2001, 14:06:05 (UTC), 40.055 N, 78.901 W, (0.6-5 Hz) T i m e (sec) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 80 Pg Sg 100 MCWV 242 222 nm/s SSPA 53 69 nm/s 120 140 D i s t a n c e (km) 160 180 SDMD 114 157 nm/s 200 220 MVL 91 162 nm/s 240 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Figure 5: Seismic record section of vertical records from the United Airlines Flight 93 crash near Shanksville, Pa on Sept. 11, 2001. Relatively consistent seismic signals arrivals are discernible at stations, SSPA and MVL. Maximum zero-to-peak amplitude at SSPA is about 140 nm/s. 10

Three-component Records at SSPA for United Flight 93 Crash near Shanksville, Pa Event time: 09/11/2001, 14:06:05 (UTC), 40.055 N, 78.901 W, (0.6-5 Hz) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Pg Sg SSPA BHZ 69 nm/s 14:06:05.00 107.6 km az= 52.8 baz=233.5 Sg Lg SSPA BHN 97 nm/s 14:06:05.00 Sg SSPA BHE 69 nm/s 14:06:05.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 time (sec) Figure 6: Three-component seismic records, vertical, North-South, and East-West components, at station SSPA from the United Airlines Flight 93 crash near Shanksville, Pa on Sept. 11, 2001. Short-period surface waves, Rg and Lg waves, are quite clear. Maximum zero-to-peak amplitudes on three-component ranges from 160 to 180 nm/s on NS-component. 11