Combinatorial Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem

Similar documents
Projective measure without projective Baire

II - REAL ANALYSIS. This property gives us a way to extend the notion of content to finite unions of rectangles: we define

Cantor Groups, Haar Measure and Lebesgue Measure on [0, 1]

The descriptive set theory of the Lebesgue density theorem. joint with A. Andretta

Infinite Combinatorics, Definability, and Forcing

Borel complexity and automorphisms of C*-algebras

SMALL SUBSETS OF THE REALS AND TREE FORCING NOTIONS

Measures. Chapter Some prerequisites. 1.2 Introduction

A Crash Course in Topological Groups

Maharam Algebras. Equipe de Logique, Université de Paris 7, 2 Place Jussieu, Paris, France

Three hours THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. 24th January

18.175: Lecture 2 Extension theorems, random variables, distributions

Reminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces

Compact subsets of the Baire space

Regularity and Definability

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller

7 About Egorov s and Lusin s theorems

Luzin and Sierpiński sets meet trees

g 2 (x) (1/3)M 1 = (1/3)(2/3)M.

The small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results)

NOTES ON UNIVERSALLY NULL SETS

(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define

4. CLASSICAL FORCING NOTIONS.

SEPARABLE MODELS OF RANDOMIZATIONS

A topological semigroup structure on the space of actions modulo weak equivalence.

Tree-adjoined spaces and the Hawaiian earring

9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning

Measurability Problems for Boolean Algebras

Complexity of Ramsey null sets

(U) =, if 0 U, 1 U, (U) = X, if 0 U, and 1 U. (U) = E, if 0 U, but 1 U. (U) = X \ E if 0 U, but 1 U. n=1 A n, then A M.

Annalee Gomm Math 714: Assignment #2

x 0 + f(x), exist as extended real numbers. Show that f is upper semicontinuous This shows ( ɛ, ɛ) B α. Thus

Lecture 3: Probability Measures - 2

Eventually Different Functions and Inaccessible Cardinals

Real Analysis Chapter 1 Solutions Jonathan Conder

VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE FOR THE ENTROPY

Hypergraphs and proper forcing

Problem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 2015.

Notes for Functional Analysis

2 Probability, random elements, random sets

Measurability of Intersections of Measurable Multifunctions

Rectifiability of sets and measures

Introduction to Hausdorff Measure and Dimension

MAT1000 ASSIGNMENT 1. a k 3 k. x =

Continuous and Borel Dynamics of Countable Borel Equivalence Relations

RANDOMNESS VIA INFINITE COMPUTATION AND EFFECTIVE DESCRIPTIVE SET THEORY

MTH 404: Measure and Integration

1.A Topological spaces The initial topology is called topology generated by (f i ) i I.

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515

Measures and Measure Spaces

WHY Y-C.C. DAVID CHODOUNSKÝ AND JINDŘICH ZAPLETAL

Cones of measures. Tatiana Toro. University of Washington. Quantitative and Computational Aspects of Metric Geometry

Measure Theory on Topological Spaces. Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

MH 7500 THEOREMS. (iii) A = A; (iv) A B = A B. Theorem 5. If {A α : α Λ} is any collection of subsets of a space X, then

Chapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries

Lebesgue Measure. Dung Le 1

The Lebesgue Integral

van Rooij, Schikhof: A Second Course on Real Functions

Lebesgue Measure on R n

Classes of Polish spaces under effective Borel isomorphism

Uncountable trees and Cohen κ-reals

Lecture Notes on Descriptive Set Theory

Wojciech Stadnicki. On Laver extension. Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Praca semestralna nr 2 (semestr letni 2010/11) Opiekun pracy: Janusz Pawlikowski

From Haar to Lebesgue via Domain Theory

Uniquely Universal Sets

Lebesgue Measure on R n

Computational Logic and Applications KRAKÓW On density of truth of infinite logic. Zofia Kostrzycka University of Technology, Opole, Poland

Chapter 4. Measurable Functions. 4.1 Measurable Functions

Von Neumann s Problem

Playing with forcing

Math 5051 Measure Theory and Functional Analysis I Homework Assignment 2

Contents Ordered Fields... 2 Ordered sets and fields... 2 Construction of the Reals 1: Dedekind Cuts... 2 Metric Spaces... 3

Measure Theory. John K. Hunter. Department of Mathematics, University of California at Davis

CCC Forcing and Splitting Reals

Measure and Integration: Concepts, Examples and Exercises. INDER K. RANA Indian Institute of Technology Bombay India

A NOTE ON CORRELATION AND LOCAL DIMENSIONS

ORTHOGONAL MEASURES AND ERGODICITY. By Clinton T. Conley Cornell University and. By Benjamin D. Miller Universität Münster

ON LEFT-INVARIANT BOREL MEASURES ON THE

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory

Measure and Category. Marianna Csörnyei. ucahmcs

Chain Conditions of Horn and Tarski

Overview of normed linear spaces

INDEPENDENCE, RELATIVE RANDOMNESS, AND PA DEGREES

Silver trees and Cohen reals

A Note on the Convergence of Random Riemann and Riemann-Stieltjes Sums to the Integral

Lebesgue Integration: A non-rigorous introduction. What is wrong with Riemann integration?

A thesis. submitted in partial fulfillment. of the requirements for the degree of. Master of Science in Mathematics. Boise State University

Indeed, if we want m to be compatible with taking limits, it should be countably additive, meaning that ( )

MATS113 ADVANCED MEASURE THEORY SPRING 2016

Examples of non-shy sets

Cardinal invariants of closed graphs

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS

Measures. 1 Introduction. These preliminary lecture notes are partly based on textbooks by Athreya and Lahiri, Capinski and Kopp, and Folland.

Filters and sets of Vitali type

18.175: Lecture 3 Integration

López-Escobar s theorem and metric structures

Lecture 10. Theorem 1.1 [Ergodicity and extremality] A probability measure µ on (Ω, F) is ergodic for T if and only if it is an extremal point in M.

REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS

CHAPTER 6. Differentiation

Transcription:

Combinatorial Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem Philipp Schlicht joint with David Schrittesser, Sandra Uhlenbrock and Thilo Weinert September 6, 2017 Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 1/19

Lebesgue s Density Theorem Suppose that (X, d, µ) is a Polish metric space with a Borel measure µ. An element x of X is a µ-density point of a subset A of X if Theorem lim inf ɛ>0 µ(b ɛ (x) A)) µ(b ɛ (x)) = 1. (1) (Lebesgue) Suppose that A is a Lebesgue measurable subset of R n with the Lebesgue measure and D L (A) is the set of Lebesgue density points of A. Then µ(a D L (A)) = 0. (2) (Miller) Suppose that (X, d, µ) is an ultrametric Polish space with a finite Borel measure µ and A X is µ-measurable. Let D L,µ (A) be the set of µ-density points of A. Then µ(a D L,µ (A)) = 0. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 2/19

Lebesgue s Density Theorem Theorem (Vitali s Covering Theorem) Given a collection of open balls centered at the points of a set A R n that contains arbitrary small balls at each point in A, there is a disjoint subcollection that covers A except for a null set. Proof of Lebesgue s Density Theorem. We claim that A ɛ = {x R n µ(b lim sup r(x)\a) r 0 µ(b r(x)) for all ɛ > 0. > ɛ} is a null set For any δ > 0, let U δ be an open set with A ɛ U δ and µ(u δ \ A ɛ) < δ. We obtain a collection C from Vitali s Covering Theorem for the collection of all open balls B U δ with µ(b\a) > ɛ at elements of A µ(b) ɛ. Then ɛµ(a ɛ) ɛ B C µ(b) < B C µ(b \ A) µ(u δ \ A) < δ. Since this holds for all δ > 0, we have µ(a ɛ) = 0. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 3/19

Counterexamples If (X, d) is a metric space, d is called doubling if for some n N, any open ball B 2r (x) can be covered by n balls of radius r. Theorem (Käenmäki-Rajala-Suomala) There is a finite Borel measure ν and a complete doubling metric δ on the Cantor space, compatible with the standard topology, such that some closed set C of positive measure has no ν-density points. Theorem (Andretta-Costantini-Camerlo) For any Polish measure space (X, d, µ) there is a compatible metric δ such that (X, δ, µ) does not satisfy Lebesgue s density theorem. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 4/19

Question Can the Lebesgue density theorem be generalized to other ideals instead of the ideal of null sets, in particular the σ-ideals defined by tree forcings? Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 5/19

Tree forcings and their ideals = 2 or = ω. We say P is a tree forcing iff the conditions in P are perfect subtrees of <ω ordered by inclusion such that for all T P and all s T we have that {t T s t or t s} P. (Ikegami) Suppose that P is a tree forcing and A is a subset of ω. (i) A N P if for every T P, there is some S P with S T and [S] A =. A set A in N P is also called P-null. (ii) I P is the σ-ideal generated by N P. (iii) A IP if for every T P, there is some S P with S T and [S] A I P. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 6/19

Example: Random forcing Let µ denote the uniform measure on ω 2. Random forcing B is the tree forcing consisting of perfect trees T 2 <ω such that µ([t ]) > 0 and for all s T, µ([{t T s t or t s}]) > 0. A subset A of ω 2 is B-measurable iff for every T B there is some S B with S T such that either [S] A I B or [S] A c I B. What is a B-density point? Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 7/19

Density points for Random forcing (i) Suppose that A is a B-measurable subset of ω 2. Suppose that x ω 2. Then x is a B-translation density point of A if for every T B and s = stem T, there is some n 0 such that for all n n 0, f x n f 1 s [T ] A / I B. (ii) Let D B tr(a) denote the set of translation density points of A. (iii) We say that B has the translation density property if for every B-measurable subset A of ω 2, A D B tr(a) I B. Here f s (x) = s x and f 1 s [T ] = [T/s] = {t s t [T ]}. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 8/19

Density points for Random forcing Lemma Suppose that A is a B-measurable subset of ω 2. (a) If lim inf n µ n (x, A) = 1, then x is a B-translation density point of A. (b) If lim inf n µ n (x, A) = 0, then x is not a B-translation density point of A. (c) If lim inf n µ n (x, A) (0, 1), then x can be but does not have to be a B-translation density point of A. Corollary For every B-measurable set A, D L (A) = I B D B tr(a). In particular B has the translation density property. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 9/19

Density points for ideals Let I always denote a σ-ideal on the Borel subsets of ω. (a) A map g : A B between Borel sets A, B is I-invariant if for every Borel set X B, we have X I if and only if g 1 [X] I. (b) Let Bor(I) denote the set of all I-invariant Borel isomorphisms g : ω ω. (c) We say B is I-positive iff B / I. Let I + denote the I-positive sets. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 10/19

Density points for ideals Suppose that A is a subset of ω and Γ is a subgroup of Bor(I). (i) An element x of ω is an I-density point of A w.r.t. Γ if for every I-positive Borel set B, there is some s <ω and some n B such that for all n n B and all g Γ, (f x n g f 1 s )[B] A / I. Let D I,Γ (A) denote the set of I-density points of A w.r.t. Γ. (ii) An element x of ω is a strong I-density point of A if there is some n 0 such that for all n n 0, we have f 1 x n [Ac N x n ] I. Let D I,strong (A) denote the set of strong I-density points of A. Note that D I,strong (A) D I,Bor(I) (A) D I,Γ (A) D I,{id} (A). Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 11/19

Density points We say that I has the density property w.r.t. Γ if for all Borel subsets A of ω, A D I,Γ (A) I. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 12/19

Density points (i) P is homogeneous if for all S, T P, there is some U T and f : [S] [U] in Bor(I P ). (ii) P is nondegenerate if it is not equivalent to Cohen forcing and s S P s stem S. (iii) (Friedman-Khomskii-Kulikov) A tree forcing P is topological if for all S, T P with [S] [T ], there is U P with [U] [S] [T ]. For a topological tree forcing P, we let τ P be the topology on ω with basis {[T ] T P}. Lemma Assume that P is a homogeneous, nondegenerate, topological tree forcing and let I = IP. Then for all I-measurable A, D I,strong (A) = D I,Bor(I) (A). Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 13/19

Density property Suppose that P is a topological tree forcing and let A be a I P -measurable subset of ω which has the property of Baire in τ P. An x ω is a P-topological density point of A if x U = D P top(a), where U is the unique open subset in τ P such that A U I P. Theorem Suppose that P is a homogeneous, nondegenerate, topological tree forcing with the ccc w.r.t. I = IP. Suppose that for every T P there is an S T such that every x [S] is an I-density point of [T ] w.r.t. Bor(I). Then for every I-measurable A, D I,Bor(I) (A) = D I,strong (A) = I D P top(a). Therefore I has the density property w.r.t. Bor(I). Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 14/19

Stem-linked forcings Suppose that P is a tree forcing on <ω. Then P is stem-linked if for all S, T P, if stem S stem T and stem T S, then S and T are compatible. Stem-linked implies σ-linked, ccc w.r.t. IP, and topological. Lemma Let P be a stem-linked tree forcing on <ω. Then for every T P we have that every x [T ] is an I P -density point of [T ] w.r.t. Bor(I P ). Corollary Suppose P is a stem-linked, nondegenerate, homogeneous tree forcing on <ω. Then I P has the density property w.r.t. Bor(I P ). Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 15/19

Examples The I-density property w.r.t Bor(I) holds for the σ-ideals I defined by the following tree forcings, since they are stem-linked: Cohen forcing C, Hechler forcing H, F -Laver forcing L F for a filter F, and F -Mathias forcing R F for a filter F. However, random forcing B does not have a dense stem-linked subset. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 16/19

Counterexamples The translation density property fails for the following tree forcings. Sacks forcing S, Mathias forcing R, Laver forcing L, Miller forcing M, and Silver forcing V. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 17/19

From ideals to forcings Theorem (Ikegami) Suppose that P is a proper tree forcing. Then the map ι: P B/I P that sends T P to the I P -equivalence class represented by [T ] is a dense embedding, where B denotes the class of Borel subsets of ω and B/I P denotes the quotient Boolean algebra. A σ-ideal I on the Borel subsets of ω is homogeneous if there are I-invariant Borel isomorphisms between any two I-positive Borel sets. Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 18/19

Open questions Question Does the density property fail for some homogeneous ccc σ-ideal? Question Does the density property hold for some homogeneous non-ccc σ-ideal? Question Is it consistent that there is no definable selector for the equivalence relation equal modulo countable on the class of Borel sets? Philipp Schlicht Variants of Lebesgue s Density Theorem 19/19