Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10): 463-47, 011 ISSN 1991-8178 eservoir Evaluation of Abu oa Fortion by Using Well Log Data at East of Beni-Zouf Area, Egypt 1 El Kady, H., Ghorab, M., adan, M.A., 1 Throut, A.H and Hamm, M. 1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Department of exploration, Egyptian Petroleum esearch Institute, Cairo, Egypt. Abstract: The new concept for oil exploration in Egypt in the last few years is to go to the Upper Egypt, where it is considered as a promising area.the area of study is located to the east of Benisouf,Egypt where six wells are located(ebs-7x,ebs-8x, EBS-6X, EBS-4X, EBS-3X,and EBS-X). Abu oa Fortion is considered as target for oil exploration and production, especially the Abu oa (G) Member at Western Desert of Egypt. The available open-hole well log data used in the analysis of Abu oa Fortion are in the form of resistivity logs (deep and allow), porosity tools (sonic, density and neutron) and the gam-ray log to determine the petrophysical parameters. The petrophysical parameters (total porosity, effective porosity, ale volume, and hydrocarbon and movable hydrocarbon saturations) are represented in the form of iso-parametric ps. This analysis of the considered studied rock unit in the area of study illustrates that, the reservoir quality increases toward the western part of Abu oa (G) Member for the study area. Key words: eservoir, Abu oa fortion, well log data, Egypt. INTODUCTION Abu oa Fortion is considered as a target for oil exploration in Western Desert and is subdivided into seven members termed inforlly A, B, C, D, E, F and G Members A, B, D and F are inly composed of calcareous rock, with argillaceous intercalation. Members C,E and G are de-up of calcareous rock with arenaceous interbeds, Fig. (). Many of the steps are followed to calculate the petrophysical parameters, such as V,porosity,Sw and hydrocarbon saturation for the fortion,and to Abu oa (G) member where it is considered as a pay zone and a target for oil exploration. Fig. 1: Location p of the study area. Corresponding Author: Mohmoud Ghorab, Department of exploration, Egyptian Petroleum esearch Institute, Cairo, Egypt. E-il: ghorab9@hotil.com 463
Fig. : Well location p of the study area. MATEIALS AND METHODS Shale Determination: A-Gam-ay Method: Gam-ray log is one of the best tools used for identifying and determining the ale volume. This is principally due to its sensitive response for the radioactive terials, which norlly concentrated in the aly rocks. The following equation is used to determine the Gam-ray index (Dresser Atlas, 1983): G = G G log x G G min min (1) G is the Gam-ray index. G log is the Gam-ray reading for each zone. G min and G x are the minimum Gam-ray value for (clean sand or carbonate) and the ximum Gamray value (ale), respectively. Then, the ale volume for each zone can be calculated from the Gam-ray index, by either of the following formulae (Dresser Atlas, 1979): A-Older ocks (Paleozoic and Mesozoic) Consolidated: V = 0.33 [ (G) 1.0] = () B - Younger ocks (Tertiary), Unconsolidated: V = 0.083 [ (3.7G) 1.0] = (3) Accordingly, the first formula was applied for Abu oa Fortion in the present work. 464
B - Neutron Method: It can be used for determining the ale volume in case of high clay content and low effective porosities, from the formula: ( N ) log V = (4) ( N ) ( N ) log is the neutron log reading for each studied zone, and ( N ) is the neutron log reading in front of a ale zone. C esistivity Method: It can be utilized to calculate the ale volume in case of high clay content and low ( t ) values, from the relation: V tlog (5) If this ratio is more than (0.5) (i.e., 0.5 V 1) then: V ( / t ) = (6) If this ratio is less than (0.5) (i.e., V 0.5) then: V tlog 1/B cl tlog = (7) cl is the resistivity log reading of a ale zone. cl is the resistivity log reading of a clay zone. t log is the resistivity log reading for each zone and B is a constant, ranging in value between 1 and. Correction of Shale Volume: The values of () obtained previously must be corrected by valid formulae to obtain the optimum ale values usable in the log interpretation. The first formula is : V = 1.7 ( 0.7) (Clavier et al., 1971) (8) 3.38 The second formula is: 0.5 V = 1.5 (Steiber, 1973) (9) The usual approach for deciding which of the resulted ale volumes to use is to find the minimum values of the results. The mini have to be chosen, because most of the errors for any method tend to increase the apparent ale volume. Then, the different zones were classified into clean, aly and ale zones, depending on the following bases: - If V < 10 % This means clean zone. - If V is from 10 to 35 % This means aly zone. - If V > 35 % This means ale zone. 465
Shale Distribution Map of Abu oa Fortion: Fig. (4) ows the ale distribution p for Abu oa Fortion, where it reveals gradual increase toward the northern eastern direction, while the minimum values are observed at the southwestern direction. Fig. 3: lithostratigraphic column of the study area. Fig. 4: Shale Distribution of Abu oa Fortion for the study area. Shale Distribution Map of Abu oa (G) Member: The ale distribution p of Abu oa (G) Member Fig. (10) exhibits a general low at the central part of the area, that changes northeastwardly and northwestwardly to give higher values at ABS-X and EBS-6x wells. Determination of Types Of Porosities: Total Porosity ( t ): A - Sonic log: The porosity can be diversified according to its presence in clean or aly zones. The determination of either of these porosities can be explained as follows: In Clean Zones: The determination of the sonic porosity in the ale free fortions depends on Wyllie et al., (1958) formula as follows: S = T log T T f T (10) 466
If the compaction factor is considered incase of ale occurrence, then: Tlog T S = Tf T T C CP = 100 1 CP and (11) (1) T log is the reading of the evaluated zone on the sonic log in sec / ft. T is the sonic transit time of the trix terial. T f is the sonic transit time of the fluid; it is about 188 sec/ft. for saline water. CP is an empirical correction (compaction) factor. T is the sonic transit time of the ale and C is a constant norlly equals 1.0 (Hilchie, 1978). In Shaly Zones: The sonic porosity is determined in the aly fortion (Dresser Atlas, 1979) from the formula: Tlog T S = Tf T 1 V CP T T Tf T (13) B - Density Log: It is one of the best tools for determining the fortion porosity, due to the minor influence of argillaceous tter, if present, in its response. In clean and aly zones, the porosity derived from density log can be determined as follows: In Clean Zones: The porosities obtained from the density log ( D ) are calculated (Wyllie, 1963) from the relation: b D = f (14) b is the fortion bulk density, f is the fluid density (equals 1.1 for saline mud) and is the trix density, as calculated from the formula : silic carb = (15) silic is the density of sandstone zone and carb is the density of carbonate zone. In Shaly Zones: The following formula (Dresser Atlas, 1979) is used for determining the total porosity in the aly fortions: D = b f V (16) f 467
is the ale zone density. Neutron Log: In Clean Zones: Neutron logs directly give the porosity values ( CNL ) in the clean zones. In Shaly Zones: In the aly zones, neutron porosity can be corrected for the effect of the implied ales. The corrected porosity, as derived from the neutron log, can be thus nipulated according to Allen s equation (1965) as follows: NC = N log V N (17) NC is the neutron porosity corrected for aliness effect, N is the neutron porosity of a ale zone and N log is the reading of neutron porosity from the log. For clean and aly zones, the values of porosity obtained from sonic, density and neutron logs are termed S, D and N, respectively. It must be noticed that, the values of N and D represent the total porosities (priry + secondary), while the values of S represent the priry porosities, in case of aly and carbonate rocks. Effective Porosities ( e ): This type of porosities depends largely on the degree of connection between the rock pores with each other forming channels, to facilitate the path of fluids through the lithologic contents. There are two ways to calculate the effective porosities: The former is the general equation: e1 = t (1 V ) (18) The latter is the empirical formula: NC 7DC e = 9 (19) NC is the neutron porosity corrected for aliness effect and DC is the density porosity corrected for aliness effect. The corrected neutron and density porosities are calculated (Schlumberger, 197) from the equations: NC = N DC = D N 0.30 V 0.45 D 0.13 V 0.45 (0) (1) N is the neutron porosity of a ale zone and D is the density porosity of a ale zone. 468
Effective Porosity Distribution Map of Abu oa Fortion: Generally, the effective porosity distribution of Abu oa Fortion decreases gradually from from the north toward the north eastern ward (Fig. 5), in which the minimum porosity value (8%) is represented at EBS- 4X well, till reaches its ximum value (19%) toward the southwest direction. Effective Porosity Distribution Map of Abu oa (G) Member: Generally, the effective porosity distribution of Abu oa (G) Member increases gradually toward the southeast and southwest (Fig. 11), in which the minimum porosity value (%) is represented at EBS-4X well, while reaches its ximum value (%) toward southwest direction at EBS-7X WELL. Determination of Water Saturations: Total Water Saturation: Extensive studies by Sindoux (1963) on artificial media composed of sand and ale have suggested that, the resistivity can be expressed by the relation: 1 t n Sw VSw () a w (1 V ) In using this equation, is taken equal to the resistivity of the adjacent ale beds and V is the ale fraction. In recent years, there are equations that have gained the widest acceptance in the evaluation of water saturation in aly sands. These equations have the general form: S w = V V a a (1 V w w 4 (1 V ) t ) (3) This is the water saturation equation, in case of total ale model. Flued Zone of Water Saturation (S xo ): The estition of S xo is essential for the definition of the residual hydrocarbon saturation (S hr ) in clean and aly zones. The flued zone water saturation is determined for both as follows: Clean Zones: It is calculated using Archie's equation (194) as follows: S xo a m mf xo 1/ n (4) Shaly Zones: It is determined in the aly zones, utilizing the Saraband's equation as follows: 1 xo V ( 1 V / ) m/ a mf S n/ xo (5) Water Saturation Distribution Map of Abu oa Fortion: (Fig. 6) ows that, the water proportion attains its ximum value of 37% at EBS-7X well and the minimum value of % at EBS-X well localities. 469
Types of Hydrocarbon Saturations: Since water saturation is the natural result of the previous calculations, it is often reported by the log analyst as one of the answers. However, the amount of oil or gas, not water, is wanted. This infortion can be derived from the following equations: Total Hydrocarbon Saturation: S h = 1 S w (5) - esidual Hydrocarbon Saturation: S hr = 1 S xo (6) Movable Hydrocarbon Saturation: S hm = S h S hr (7) S hr is the residual hydrocarbon saturation in the invad zone and S hm is the movable hydrocarbon saturation. The water saturation (reducible and irreducible) and hydrocarbon saturation (movable and residual) are illustrated in the iso-parametric ps given later. Total Hydrocarbon Distribution Maps of Abu oa Fortion: The total hydrocarbon saturation p (Fig. 7) reveals its ximum value of 78% at EBS-X well and the minimum value of 63% at EBS-7X and EBS-3X wells, with a general trend of increase towards the northeastern direction in the opposite direction of the water saturation trend for the study area. The residual hydrocarbon is generally sller than the movable one that increases gradually towards the southern direction (Fig. 9). Figure (8) reflects that, the movable hydrocarbon increases toward the northern direction at EBS-8X well. Hydrocarbon Movable Distribution Maps of Abu oa (G) Member: The hydrocarbon movable saturation p (Fig. 1) reveals its ximum value of 65% at EBS-8X well and the minimum value of 63% at EBS-7X well, with a general trend of increase towards the northeastern direction. Fig. 5: Effective Porosity Distribution Map of Abu oa Fortion for the Stury Area. Fig. 6: Water Saturation p of Abu oa Fortion for the Study Area. 470
Fig. 7: Hydrocarbon saturation Map of Abu oa Fortion for the Study Area. Fig. 8: Movable Hydrocarbon Saturation Map of Abu oa Fortion for the Study Area. Fig. 9: esidual Hydrocarbon Saturation Map of Abu oa Fortion for the Study Area. Fig. 10: Shale Distribution of Abu oa Fortion g Member. Fig. 11: Effective Porosity Distribution Map of Abu oa Fortion G Member. 471
Fig. 1: Movable Hydrocarbon Saturaton Map of Abu oa Fortion G Member. ESULTLS AND CONCLUSIONS The available open-hole well log data used in the analysis of Abu oa Fortion are in the form of resistivity logs (deep and allow), porosity tools (sonic, density and neutron) and the gam-ray log. The petrophysical parameters (total porosity, effective porosity, ale volume, hydrocarbon and movable hydrocarbon saturations) are represented in the form of iso-parametric ps. This analysis of the studied rock unit in the area of study illustrates that, the reservoir quality increases toward the western direction of Abu oa (G) Member for the study area. From the accurate calculation of water saturation, it can obtain the accurate amount of hydrocarbons(movable and residual hydrocarbons) can be determined in the reservoir, where the movable hydrocarbon ows a gradual increase toward the west and northwest at EBS-8X well, while it exhibits a gradual decrease toward the south direction, where EBS-7X well is located. From the abovementioned, it can be deduced that, the eastern part of the study area is promising for oil exploration and production. EFEENCES Allen, L.S., W.. Mills,.I. Goldwell, 1965. The Effect of Fluid Invasion in Pulsed Neutron Logging. Geophysics, 30(3). Clavier, C. W.. Huyle, D. Meunier, 1971. Quantitative interpretation of T.D.T. logs; part I and II, Journal of petroleum technology, No., 6. Dresser Atlas, 1979. Log interpretation charts ; Houston, Dresser industries, Inc. Dresser Atlas, 1983. "Log Interpretation Charts." Dresser Industries Inc., Houston, Texas. Hilichie, D.W., 1978. Applied open hole interpretation ; Golden, Colorado, D.W. Hilchie, Inc. Schlumberger, 197. Log interpretation, volume I, principles ; paris, France. Schlumberger, 197. The essential of log interpretation practice ; France. Sindoux, P., 1963. "Measures dielectriques en milieu poreux,application a measure des saturation en eau,etude du comportement des ssifs argileux.evue de I institute francais du petrole", supplementary issue. Steiber,.G., 1973. Optimization of ale volumes in open hole logs ; Jour. pet. Tech. Wyllie, M..J., 1963. The fundamentals of well log interpretation ; New York, Academic Press. Wyllie, M..J., A.. Gregory, G.H.F. Gardner, 1958. An Experimental Investigation of Factors Affecting Elastic Wave Velocities in Porous Media; Geophysics, 3(3): 459-493. 47