CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL, AND MINERALOGICAL PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN SOIL PROFILES IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI DELTA B. N. DRISKELL ABSTRACT

Similar documents
MINERAL CONTENT AND DISTRIBUTION AS INDEXES OF WEATHERING IN THE OMEGA AND AHMEEK SOILS OF NORTHERN WISCONSIN

Adsorption of ions Ion exchange CEC& AEC Factors influencing ion

CLASS EXERCISE 5.1 List processes occurring in soils that cause changes in the levels of ions.

Copyright SOIL STRUCTURE and CLAY MINERALS

Soil Fertility. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management June 1, Patricia Steinhilber

Be sure to show all calculations so that you can receive partial credit for your work!

Asian Journal of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Cation Exchange Capacity, CEC

THE USE OF PIPERIDINE AS AN AID TO CLAY-MINERAL IDENTIFICATION

Soil Mechanics Prof. B.V.S. Viswanadham Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 3

BUFFERING MECHANISM AND SENSITIVITY TO ACID DEPOSITION OF SOILS OF AKWA IBOM STATE, NIGERIA

Lecture 6: Soil Profiles: Diagnostic Horizons

Chemical Weathering and Soils

HETEROGENEITY IN MONTMORILLONITE. JAMES L. MCATEE, JR. Baroid Division, National Lead Co., Houston, Texas

SOIL and WATER CHEMISTRY

Lecture 14: Cation Exchange and Surface Charging

Soil Sequences in the Hawaiian Islands 1

Lecture 4 What Controls the Composition of Seawater

T6 soil base cation weathering rates

Circle the correct (best) terms inside the brackets:

Lecture 15: Adsorption; Soil Acidity

Weathering, Soil, and Mass Movements

Lecture 6. Physical Properties. Solid Phase. Particle Composition


Engineering Geology ECIV 3302

Analysis of Clays and Soils by XRD

Tikrit University. College of Engineering Civil engineering Department SOIL PROPERTES. Soil Mechanics. 3 rd Class Lecture notes Up Copyrights 2016

Soil Colloidal Chemistry. Compiled and Edited by Dr. Syed Ismail, Marthwada Agril. University Parbhani,MS, India

Groundwater Resources of Missouri. Cynthia Brookshire, R. G.

Agricultural Fertilizer Applicator Soil Test Results What the heck do they mean?

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Lecture 13 More Surface Reactions on Mineral Surfaces. & Intro to Soil Formation and Chemistry

CERAMIC MATERIALS I. Asst. Prof. Dr. Ayşe KALEMTAŞ

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

Ch. 4 - Clay Minerals, Rock Classification Page 1. Learning Objectives. Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Possible chemical controls of illite/smectite composition during diagenesis

Arsenic and Other Trace Elements in Groundwater in the Southern San Joaquin Valley of California

Atoms, Molecules and Minerals

Regents Earth Science. Lab &: Elements / Minerals

Igneous Rock Classification, Processes and Identification Physical Geology GEOL 100

Soil horizons differ in color, texture, structure, consistence, porosity and soil reaction.

The Production of Sediment. Contents. Weathering. Chapters 1, 3

Gain a better understanding of soil ph and how it is measured. Understand how lime requirement is determined.

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Weathering and mineral equilibria. Seminar at NGU 23 May 2016 Håkon Rueslåtten

Soils. Source: Schroeder and Blum, 1992

The Dynamics of Potassium in some. Australian soils

CLAY MINERALS AT A PENNSYLVANIAN DISCONFORMITY 1

Slake Durability of a Deep Red Stratum Sandstone under Different Environments

The Earth s Layers. Convection and Hot Spots. The Earth s Layers. The Earth s resources were determined when the planet formed.

Geology 252, Historical Geology, California State University, Los Angeles - professor: Dr. Alessandro Grippo

Volume Composition of a Desirable Surface Soil

The Martian Sedimentary Mass: Constraints on its Composition, Age and Size. Scott McLennan Department of Geosciences, SUNY Stony Brook

MINERALOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF CANADA CLAYS AND THE RESOURCE GEOLOGIST

Chapter 2. Wearing Down Landforms: Rivers and Ice. Physical Weathering

Sedimentary Geology. Strat and Sed, Ch. 1 1

SOIL. The Exciting World Beneath Our Feet. J. Kenneth Torrance Professor Emeritus Geography and Environmental Studies Carleton University

1982/20. Supplementary report on sandstones from Linden sandstone quarry, New Norfolk.

Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 DEFINITIONS

Soil Formation. Lesson Plan: NRES B2-4

INORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C; FERTILISERS PRODUCING CARBON DIOXIDE

Geos 306, Mineralogy Final Exam, Dec 12, pts

PLATE TECTONICS, VOLCANISM AND IGNEOUS ROCKS

ANOMALIES IN TILE ETHYLENE GLYCOL SOLVA- TION TECHNIQUE USED IN X-RAY DIFFRACTION * ABSTRACT

Running head: TITLE 1. Lab Report. Name. Academic Institution. Author Note. Class. Professor

MINERALOGY OF SOILS FROM DIFFERENT AGROECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF BANGLADESH: REGION 3 \TISTA MEANDER FLOODPLAIN

CLAY MINERAL DISTRIBUTION IN THE HIAWATHA SANDY SOILS OF NORTHERN WISCONSIN 1

CATION EXCHANGE BETWEEN MIXTURES OF CLAY MINERALS AND BETWEEN A ZEOLITE AND A CLAY MINERAL*

BASELINE STUDIES OF THE CLAY MINERALS SOCIETY SOURCE CLAYS: CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF MAJOR ELEMENTS

Chapter 4 Implications of paleoceanography and paleoclimate

Weathering Cycle Teacher Notes

REFERENCE: The Blue Planet An Introduction to Earth System Science. Brian J. Skinner and Barbara W. Murck (2011) Third Edition. John Wiley and Sons

Field Trips. Field Trips

Earth Science, 10e. Edward J. Tarbuck & Frederick K. Lutgens

Where is all the water?

JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY FEBRUARY-MARCH, 1913 THE RELATIVE SOLUBILITIES OF THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF ROCKS

Only healthy soil can grow a nutrient dense food. You are what you eat!

Chapter 3 Sedimentation of clay minerals

The Rock Cycle: Part Two

Chapter 8 Earth Systems and Resources

Igneous Rocks. Sedimentary Rocks. Metamorphic Rocks

Log Interpretation Parameters Determined by Analysis of Green River Oil Shale Samples: Initial Steps

Overview. Rock weathering Functions of soil Soil forming factors Soil properties

CHLORITIZED WEATHERING PRODUCTS OF A NEW ENGLAND GLACIAL TILL

NOTE THE TEXTURE OF PALYGORSKITE FROM THE RIFT VALLEY, SOUTHERN ISRAEL

Processes affecting continental shelves

Sedimentology & Stratigraphy. Thanks to Rob Viens for slides

9/4/2015. Feldspars White, pink, variable Clays White perfect Quartz Colourless, white, red, None

Sedimentary Environments Chapter 8

Lecture 29: Soil Formation

GEOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND MATERIALS SGM210

CESIUM SORPTION REACTIONS AS INDICATOR CLAY MINERAL STRUCTURES

Soil physical and chemical properties the analogy lecture. Beth Guertal Auburn University, AL

Which particle of quartz shows evidence of being transported the farthest distance by the stream? A) B) C) D)

WEATHERING. Weathering breakdown of rock materials Erosion transport of broken-down materials

Clay Science 9, (1996)

Grain size distribution of surface sediment. Mineralogy of different sediment fractions. Geochemistry of surface sediment fine fraction

Soil - the battery of your business

2.7: Chemical Symbols and Formulas

Transcription:

CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL, AND MINERALOGICAL PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN SOIL PROFILES IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI DELTA B. N. DRISKELL Louisiana State University ABSTRACT The soils of the lower Mississippi Delta are derived from the Mississippi or Red River depositions or some combination of these two. Profiles of the Iberia, Baldwin, Buxin, Sharkey, and Mhoon were selected for the study. The comparative results indicate that the Sharkey was highest in cation exchange capacity and exchangeable calcium and magnesium. Base saturation was highest in the Iberia and lowest in the Baldwin. The variation in cation exchange capacity was possibly due, in general, to the differences in texture, except for the Iberia. The clay fraction of the Iberia contained slightly larger quantities of high cation exchange capacity minerals than the other soil series of the study. Silica was highest in the Baldwin while the oxides of aluminum, iron, magnesium, and potassium were highest in the Buxin. liberia was highest in calcium oxide. Silicasesquioxide and silica-ferric oxide ratios were highest in the Sharkey and lowest in the Buxin. The silica-alumina ratio was highest in the Baldwin and lowest in the Buxin. The comparison of the Buxin with soils of the Mississippi River deposition indicates that the Red River depositions were generally lower in silica-sesquioxide ratios and total calcium oxide and higher in total magnesia and potash. The X-ray patterns indicate that montmorillonite and illite were the dominant clay minerals present. The greatest quantities of montmorillonite were generally found in the Iberia profiles, although this was not always true. Also, in general, the content of montmorillonite increased and illite decreased with profile depth. Secondary minerals were halloysite, kaolinite, vermiculite, and chlorite. The cation exchange capacity of the clay fraction also indicated the higher content of montmorillonite or associated minerals in the Iberia than in the Buxin, Baldwin, Sharkey or Mhoon soils. INTRODUCTION The alluvial soils comprising the study are located in the southern part of the Mississippi Delta, bordered on the East by the Mississippi River and on the South by the Gulf of Mexico. The Iberia, Baldwin, and Buxin soils occur at higher elevation and are more highly leached than the Sharkey and Mhoon soils developed from the more recent alluvium of the Mississippi River. Iberia, Baldwin and Buxin soils are generally located nearer the Atchafalaya River, while the Sharkey and Mhoon are located nearer the Mississippi River. The Red River generally flows into the Atchafalaya ; but at certain periods, when the Mississippi River is at low stage, the flow is into the Mississippi River. In certain instances the Mississippi and Red River depositions from which certain of these soils are derived were either mixed or settled out in mixed layers. 384

B. N. DRISKELL 385 The purpose of this study has been to determine the similarities or differences of the different soil series by physical, chemical and mineralogical methods. Several profiles of each series have been studied and the surface layer of a representative soil from each series is presented in the data. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to thank Drs. C. D. Jeffries of Pennsylvania State University and S. B. McCaleb of North Carolina State University for their cooperation in preparing the X-ray diffraction patterns. MORPHOLOGY The Iberia soils occur as the flat land bordering the Baldwin areas. They were developed under ponded conditions with very little leaching. They are high in organic matter and soil reaction and have a high water table. There are no physical indications of Red River influences. The profiles in the Baldwin occur on the outer and lower flanks of the natural levee ridge. They are more highly leached, slightly more acid, and show more profile development than the Iberia. Red River influence seems evident in certain of these profiles, although there is no definite evidence. Buxin soils occur on the inner flanks of the natural levees of Bayou Teche and are derived from mixtures of Mississippi River and old Red River alluvium in varying amounts. Predominantly these depositions are from the older Red River sediments. Sharkey soils occur as a back-water deposition of the Mississippi River. They are young, unleached and may resemble the Iberia in general surface appearance. Sharkey soils are of heavy texture and do not exhibit horizontal differences in the profile. The Mhoon soils are lighter in texture than the Sharkey and are called the mixed lands of the natural levee of the Mississippi River. They are also young, unleached and undeveloped. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity of the soils were determined by the ammonium acetate method described by Peech, et al. ( 1947, pp. 7-12), with certain modifications for adaptation to the Perkins-Elmer Flame Photometer as described by Driskell (1954, p. 11). The cation exchange capacity of the clay fraction was determined by saturating the clay with potassium at ph 7.0, displacing the exchangeable potassium, and determining the exchangeable potassium with the flame photometer. The ultimate analysis of the clay fraction (less than two micron diameter) was determined on all major constituents as described by Hillebrand and Lundell (1951, pp. 645-818) for the oxides of silica, aluminum, iron, titanium, calcium and magnesium. Potassium was determined by the method described by Shapiro and Brannock (1952, p. 12).

386 CERTAIN SOIL PROFILES IN THE LOWER MlSSlSSlPI'I DELTA The X-ray diffraction patterns were made on the clay fraction according to the procedures of Jeffries and Jackson (1949, pp. 57-73). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The data given in Table I indicate that cation exchange capacity, and exchangeable calcium and magnesium were highest in the Sharkey. This TABLE I.- TEXTURAL CLASSIFICATION, PH, AND CATION EXCI{ANGI~ PROPFAITIES OF CERTAIN SURFACE SOILS OF THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI DELTA Series Texture ph Milliequivalents per 100 gin. of soil r 2. Cation Base exchange satura- Ca Mg K Na capacity tion Iberia SiCILo 6.3 18.7 4.0 0.5 0.2 22 91 Baldwin SiC1Lo 5.7 12.4 3.6.5,3 21 79 Buxin SiC1 5.9 14.6 6.3.7.3 26 83 Sharkey SiCI-CI 6.2 28.8 10.5.7,1 34 88 Mhoon SiC1 6.4 18.6 7.6.4.1 23 83 is possibly due to the unweathered characteristics of the Sharkey profiles, the source of deposition, and textural composition. Total cation exchange capacity varied somewhat with the texture of the soil. Exchangeable potassium was highest in the Sharkey and Buxin, while exchangeable sodium was highest in the Baldwin and Buxin. Soil ph was approximately equal for the Iberia, Mhoon and Sharkey and was higher than the Baldwin and Buxin. Base saturation was lowest in the Baldwin and highest in the Iberia. CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE CLAY FRACTION Table II indicates that Baldwin contained slightly the highest while Iberia contained the lowest silica content. Other series varied between these values. Aluminum oxide was equally highest in the Sharkey and Buxin and lowest in the Baldwin. Ferric oxide was highest in the Buxin and lowest in the Sharkey. This indicates that soils with Red River influence were TABLE II.- SILICATE ANALYSIS OF THE CLAY FRACTION (LEss THAN 2 ~ DIAMETER) OF CEItTAIN SURFACE SOILS OF THE LO~h'ER ~V[ISSISSIPPI DELTA Series SiO, AhO3 Fe,O3 CaO MgO K~O SiO, SiO2 SiO, R~O3 AhO3 Fe20~ Iberia 49.61 22.46 6.48 1.75 2.14 0.89 3.16 3.75 20.34 Baldwin 52.99 22.05 6.93.92 2.02 1.49 3.40 4.08 20.33 Buxin 51.48 23.65 8.47.76 3.37 2.33 3.01 3.69 16.16 Sharkey 52.62 23.61 5.il 1.25 2.15 2.10 3.45 3.92 28.42 Mhoon 52.49 23.14 6.29 1.26 2.17 2.22 3.28 3.85 22.19

B. N. DRISKELL 387 high in ferric oxide, while the Mississippi River depositions contained smaller amounts ; therefore, if the Baldwin contained appreciable quantities of Red River depositions, the content of ferric oxide would have been high. It is slightly higher than the Mhoon, considerably higher than the Sharkey, yet eonsiderably lower than the Buxin ; therefore, no definite indication was shown that the Baldwin was related to the Red River depositions. The silica-sesquioxide ratio was lowest in the Buxin and highest in the Sharkey and Baldwin. The silica-alumina ratio is relatively high in all profiles, but it was slightly highest in the Baldwin and lowest in the Buxin, which may be indicative that these two are not closely related in parent material. Considerable variation is observed in the silica-ferric oxide ratios. Sharkey contains a much higher ratio than other soils of this study. The Buxin soil was high in ferric iron and gave the lowest ratio. Of the five soils reported, Iberia was highest in total calcium oxide and lowest in total potash. Certain other profiles of Iberia have shown larger quantities of total potash to be present; in fact, the Iberia frequently resembles the Baldwin in this respect. Total magnesia was much higher in the Buxin than in the other soils. The Iberia, Baldwin, Sharkey and Mhoon soils were very similar in magnesia content. Total potash was highest in the Buxin, which was only slightly higher than the Sharkey and Mhoon. X-RAY PROPERTIES AND CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY OF CLAY FRACTION An interpretation of the X-ray diffraction patterns given in Table III indicates that montmorillonite and illite are the predominant clay minerals present. In certain instances, these may occur as interstratified montmorillonoids. The Iberia profiles generally contained slightly higher montmorillonite peaks than Baldwin. Certain profiles of Buxin resembled the Baldwin, while others resembled the Iberia. The Sharkey and Mhoon were quite similar to the Iberia in clay minerals content with the exception of TABLE III.- CLAY MINERALS CONTENT AND CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY OF THE CLAY FRACTION (LEss TI-IAN 2 /s DIAMETER) OF CERTAIN SURFACE SOILS OF THE LOWFm MIssissIPPI DELTA Series Dominant 1 Secondary 1 Cation exchange capacity in m.e./100 gin. Iberia MI* HK 74 Baldwin IM= HK 56 Buxin MI 2 HK 52 Sharkey MI HK 5.7 Mhoon IM KVC 58 1 M-montmorillonite, I-illite, H-halloysite, K-kaolinite, V-vermiculite, C-chlorite. Interstratified montmorillonoid.

388 CERTAIN SOIL PROFILES IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI DELTA slightly less montmorillonite. There was an indication that, generally, montmorillonite increased and illite decreased with depth in all profiles except certain of the Buxin, in which the unweathered surface layers contained as much montmorillonite as the lower layers. The secondary minerals were not easily identified on the X-ray patterns and further work should be done before definite conclusions are made. Apparently, the secondary minerals were mostly kaolinite, halloysite and possibly traces of vermiculite and chlorite. The cation exchange capacity of the clay fractions compared favorably with the identification of clay minerals, further indicating that the Iberia contained larger quantities of montmorillonite than the other series, as evi~lenced by the cation exchange capacity of the clay fraction. REFERENCES Driskell, B. N. (1954) Methods and procedures for soil and plant analyses (mimeographed) : Crops and Soils Department, Louisiana State University, p. 11. Hillebrand, W. F., and Lundell, G. E. F. (1"948) Applied inorganic analysis: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 645-818. Jefferies, C. D., and Jackson, M. L. (1949) Mineraloqical analysis o] soils: Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, vol. 68, pp. 57-73. Peech, Michael, Dean, L. A., and Reed, J. Fielding (1947) Methods of soil analysis for soil-fertility investigations: U.S.D.A. Circ. No. 757, pp. 7-12. Shapiro, Leonard, and Brannock, W. W (1952) Rapid analysis of silicate rocks: Geological Survey, Circular No. 165, p. 12.