Cross-covariance Functions for Tangent Vector Fields on the Sphere

Similar documents
Multivariate Gaussian Random Fields with SPDEs

Paper Review: NONSTATIONARY COVARIANCE MODELS FOR GLOBAL DATA

A Framework for Daily Spatio-Temporal Stochastic Weather Simulation

Non-stationary Cross-Covariance Models for Multivariate Processes on a Globe

Nonstationary cross-covariance models for multivariate processes on a globe

A TEST FOR STATIONARITY OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL RANDOM FIELDS ON PLANAR AND SPHERICAL DOMAINS

Positive Definite Functions on Spheres

What s for today. Introduction to Space-time models. c Mikyoung Jun (Texas A&M) Stat647 Lecture 14 October 16, / 19

Hierarchical Modeling for Univariate Spatial Data

Comparing Non-informative Priors for Estimation and Prediction in Spatial Models

Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets.

Introduction to Spatial Data and Models

Hierarchical Modelling for Univariate Spatial Data

Non-gaussian spatiotemporal modeling

Simple example of analysis on spatial-temporal data set

Karhunen-Loeve Expansion and Optimal Low-Rank Model for Spatial Processes

Models for spatial data (cont d) Types of spatial data. Types of spatial data (cont d) Hierarchical models for spatial data

Introduction to Geostatistics

Symmetry and Separability In Spatial-Temporal Processes

What s for today. Continue to discuss about nonstationary models Moving windows Convolution model Weighted stationary model

Lecture 2: Reconstruction and decomposition of vector fields on the sphere with applications

Introduction to Spatial Data and Models

Improvements to the Wind Driven Component of the OSCAR Surface Current Product

Hierarchical Modelling for Univariate Spatial Data

Handbook of Spatial Statistics Chapter 2: Continuous Parameter Stochastic Process Theory by Gneiting and Guttorp

Asymptotic standard errors of MLE

Multivariate spatial modeling

arxiv: v2 [stat.me] 9 Feb 2016

A Gaussian state-space model for wind fields in the North-East Atlantic

Statistics for analyzing and modeling precipitation isotope ratios in IsoMAP

C

Chapter 4 - Fundamentals of spatial processes Lecture notes

Geostatistical Modeling for Large Data Sets: Low-rank methods

Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geo-statistical Datasets

3D Brewer Dobson circulation derived from satellite measurements

DATA ASSIMILATION FOR FLOOD FORECASTING

Control Volume. Dynamics and Kinematics. Basic Conservation Laws. Lecture 1: Introduction and Review 1/24/2017

Lecture 1: Introduction and Review

Flexible Spatio-temporal smoothing with array methods

Chapter 4 - Fundamentals of spatial processes Lecture notes

Model Selection for Geostatistical Models

Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Processes for Large Spatial Data

Asymptotic Multivariate Kriging Using Estimated Parameters with Bayesian Prediction Methods for Non-linear Predictands

RandomFields V 3.0. Martin Schlather. Institute for Mathematics Universität Mannheim

1 Isotropic Covariance Functions

Spatial smoothing using Gaussian processes

Representation of inhomogeneous, non-separable covariances by sparse wavelet-transformed matrices

Nonstationary spatial process modeling Part II Paul D. Sampson --- Catherine Calder Univ of Washington --- Ohio State University

Generating gridded fields of extreme precipitation for large domains with a Bayesian hierarchical model

Gaussian Processes 1. Schedule

Semi-parametric estimation of non-stationary Pickands functions

Wrapped Gaussian processes: a short review and some new results

Spatial Statistics with Image Analysis. Lecture L02. Computer exercise 0 Daily Temperature. Lecture 2. Johan Lindström.

GEOMETRICAL TOOLS FOR PDES ON A SURFACE WITH ROTATING SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS ON A SPHERE

Estimation of non-stationary spatial covariance structure

Extending clustered point process-based rainfall models to a non-stationary climate

Information geometry for bivariate distribution control

Standardized Anomaly Model Output Statistics Over Complex Terrain.

Likelihood-Based Methods

1/3/2011. This course discusses the physical laws that govern atmosphere/ocean motions.

spbayes: An R Package for Univariate and Multivariate Hierarchical Point-referenced Spatial Models

Joint work with Nottingham colleagues Simon Preston and Michail Tsagris.

HEIGHT-LATITUDE STRUCTURE OF PLANETARY WAVES IN THE STRATOSPHERE AND TROPOSPHERE. V. Guryanov, A. Fahrutdinova, S. Yurtaeva

Refractivity Data Fusion

Multivariate modelling and efficient estimation of Gaussian random fields with application to roller data

A Complete Spatial Downscaler

Spatial mapping of ground-based observations of total ozone

What s for today. Random Fields Autocovariance Stationarity, Isotropy. c Mikyoung Jun (Texas A&M) stat647 Lecture 2 August 30, / 13

On Gaussian Process Models for High-Dimensional Geostatistical Datasets

Hierarchical Modeling for Spatial Data

*Department Statistics and Operations Research (UPC) ** Department of Economics and Economic History (UAB)

1.1. Fields Partial derivatives

Spatio-Temporal Covariance and Cross-Covariance Functions of the Great Circle Distance on a Sphere

Chapter 2. Vector Calculus. 2.1 Directional Derivatives and Gradients. [Bourne, pp ] & [Anton, pp ]

A test for stationarity of spatio-temporal random fields on planar and spherical domains

1 Introduction to Governing Equations 2 1a Methodology... 2

Chapter 5. The Differential Forms of the Fundamental Laws

Principal Component Analysis of Sea Surface Temperature via Singular Value Decomposition

Statistical Methods for Handling Incomplete Data Chapter 2: Likelihood-based approach

1/27/2010. With this method, all filed variables are separated into. from the basic state: Assumptions 1: : the basic state variables must

Seminar on Vector Field Analysis on Surfaces

Spatial statistics, addition to Part I. Parameter estimation and kriging for Gaussian random fields

MATH 423/ Note that the algebraic operations on the right hand side are vector subtraction and scalar multiplication.

Spatial Extremes in Atmospheric Problems

Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamics Fall 2008

arxiv: v4 [stat.me] 14 Sep 2015

Hierarchical Modelling for Multivariate Spatial Data

Hierarchical Modelling for Univariate and Multivariate Spatial Data

Student-t Process as Alternative to Gaussian Processes Discussion

Forecasting Wind Ramps

NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE. On the Seasonality of the Hadley Cell

Max-stable processes and annual maximum snow depth

Genesis Parameters, Genesis Thresholds, and Mid-Level Humidity

Threshold estimation in marginal modelling of spatially-dependent non-stationary extremes

MATH 332: Vector Analysis Summer 2005 Homework

Spectral transforms. Contents. ARPEGE-Climat Version 5.1. September Introduction 2

Models for models. Douglas Nychka Geophysical Statistics Project National Center for Atmospheric Research

A Study on Numerical Solution to the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equation

Computer model calibration with large non-stationary spatial outputs: application to the calibration of a climate model

Basics of Point-Referenced Data Models

Transcription:

Cross-covariance Functions for Tangent Vector Fields on the Sphere Minjie Fan 1 Tomoko Matsuo 2 1 Department of Statistics University of California, Davis 2 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado, Boulder ICSA/Graybill, 2015

Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model Divergence-free and Curl-free Cross-covariance Models A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields 3 Application

Motivation Tangent Vector Fields on the Sphere Suppose Y(s) R 3, s S 2 is a random tangent vector field defined on the sphere. Let Y(s) = µ(s) + e(s), µ(s) : non-random mean; e(s) : zero-mean random process. Cross-covariance function: C(s, t) = Cov(e(s), e(t)), s, t S 2.

Motivation The Helmholtz-Hodge Decomposition Any tangent vector field can be uniquely decomposed into the sum of a divergence-free component and a curl-free component. Suppose the fields are velocity fields of fluids. Divergence-free: incompressible flow. Curl-free: irrotational flow.

Motivation An Example

Motivation The Surface Gradient and the Surface Curl Suppose f is a scalar function defined on the sphere. The surface gradient of f at location s, s f =: P s s f, where P s = I 3 ss T, and s is the usual gradient on R 3. The surface curl of f at location s, where L s f =: Q s s f, 0 s 3 s 2 Q s = s 3 0 s 1. s 2 s 1 0 s f is curl-free and L s f is divergence-free.

Model Divergence-free and Curl-free Cross-covariance Models Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model Divergence-free and Curl-free Cross-covariance Models A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields 3 Application

Model Divergence-free and Curl-free Cross-covariance Models Main Idea Suppose Z(s) is a sufficiently smooth univariate random field defined on the sphere. Besides, Z(s) is stationary with mean zero and covariance function where h = s t. C(h) = Cov(Z(s), Z(t)), Apply the surface gradient (or the surface curl) operator to the sample paths of Z(s). The resulting random tangent vector field is curl-free (or divergence-free) in terms of its sample paths.

Model Divergence-free and Curl-free Cross-covariance Models Main Idea (cont.) The cross-covariance functions of the tangent vector fields are C curl,z (s, t) = P s h T hc(h) P T t, h=s t and C div,z (s, t) = Q s h T hc(h) Q T t. h=s t

Model A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields Outline 1 Motivation 2 Model Divergence-free and Curl-free Cross-covariance Models A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields 3 Application

Model A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields Tangent Mixed Matérn Suppose Z(s) = (Z 1 (s), Z 2 (s)) T is an isotropic bivariate Gaussian random field defined on the sphere with mean zero and cross-covariance function C( h ) = [C ij ( h )] 1 i,j 2, where h = s t. The cross-covariance function satisfies a parsimonious bivaraite Matérn model [Gneiting et al., 2010]. C ii ( h ) = σ 2 i M( h ; ν i, a), i = 1, 2, C 12 ( h ) = C 21 ( h ) = ρ 12 σ 1 σ 2 M( h ; (ν 1 + ν 2 )/2, a). ρ 12, ν 1 and ν 2 satisfy a sufficient and necessary condition for non-negative definiteness.

Model A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields Tangent Mixed Matérn (cont.) Based on the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition, we construct a random tangent vector field on the sphere as s Z 1 (s) + }{{} Ls Z 2 (s) }{{}. curl-free divergence-free The cross-covariance function C mix,z (s, t) can be computed correspondingly. The smoothness parameters ν 1 and ν 2 are required to be larger than 1.

Model A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields Propositions In climatology, tangent vector fields are often represented in terms of zonal and meridional components (i.e., u and v components). and u(θ, φ) = 1 Z 1 sin θ φ + Z 2 θ v(θ, φ) = 1 Z 2 sin θ φ Z 1 θ P-a.e., P-a.e. Axial symmetry: Cov(X(θ s, φ s ), X(θ t, φ t )) = C(θ s, θ t, φ s φ t ). The u and v components are axially symmetric both marginally and jointly.

Model A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields Propositions (cont.) Allows for negative covariances for the u and v components. This characteristic is very common in meteorological variables, such as wind fields [Daley, 1991].

Model A Cross-covariance Model for General Tangent Vector Fields Fast Computation The evaluation of the likelihood function requires O(n 3 ) operations, where n is the number of sampling locations. If the observations are on a regular grid on the sphere, the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) can be used to speed up the computation [Jun, 2011]. When n lat n lon, the time complexity can be reduced to O(n 2 ), where n = n lat n lon. n lat = 25, n lon = 50. Without using the DFT: 34.430 seconds. Using the DFT: 3.025 seconds.

Application Data Example Ocean surface wind dataset called QuikSCAT. Level 3 dataset. Monthly mean ocean surface winds from January 2000 to December 2008. The large-scale non-stationary variation is modeled by the method of empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis. Tangent Mixed Matérn is applied to the residual wind fields in the region of the Indian Ocean with a number of leading EOFs subtracted.

Application Residual Wind Fields Jan. 2000 u residual [m/s] Jan. 2000 v residual [m/s] 1.5 20 10 1 20 10 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 Latitude 10 20 0 Latitude 10 20 0 30 0.5 30 0.5 40 1 40 1 50 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 East longitude 60 70 80 90 100 110 East longitude 1.5 Figure : The u and v residual wind fields of January, 2000 in the region of the Indian Ocean.

Application List of Cross-covariance Models PARS-BM: parsimonious bivariate Matérn model. TMM: tangent Mixed Matérn model.

Application Table : Maximum likelihood estimates of parameters Model PARS-BM TMM σ1 2 0.184 (2.85e-3) - σ 1-0.029 (4.25e-4) σ2 2 0.157 (2.24e-3) - σ 2-0.055 (8.05e-4) ρ 12-0.080 (6.58e-3) 0.281 (7.05e-3) ν 1 1.239 (0.033) 1.758 (0.022) ν 2 1.132 (0.032) 2.034 (0.020) 1/a 0.058 (1.24e-3) - a - 9.472 (0.16) τ 1 0.218 (1.3e-3) 0.210 (1.48e-3) τ 2 0.203 (1.5e-3) 0.196 (1.48e-3) Log-likelihood -46995-45126 # of parameters 8 8

Application Cokriging We randomly hold out the data at 170 locations for evaluation and estimate the parameters using the data at the remaining 900 locations. The cross-validation procedure is repeated 20 times. Scoring rules: the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) and the mean absolute error (MAE).

Application Table : Cokriging cross-validation results (20 times) in terms of the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) Model PARS-BM TMM Scoring Rule U Residual Field [m/s] V Residual Field [m/s] Median Max Min Median Max Min MSPE 0.0753 0.0803 0.0725 0.0680 0.0731 0.0651 MAE 0.2157 0.2228 0.2117 0.2064 0.2120 0.2020 MSPE 0.0748 0.0803 0.0718 0.0671 0.0721 0.0642 MAE 0.2150 0.2226 0.2107 0.2051 0.2106 0.2009

Application References Roger Daley. Atmospheric data analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Tilmann Gneiting, William Kleiber, and Martin Schlather. Matérn cross-covariance functions for multivariate random fields. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (491):1167 1177, 2010. Mikyoung Jun. Non-stationary cross-covariance models for multivariate processes on a globe. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 38(4):726 747, 2011.